In this edition of Canadian ChemTrends, Miles and special guest co-host Andrew Ti discuss the Vice Presidential debate, Trump's Hurricane Helene GoFundMe, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's comments about chemtrails, 73% of Amazon employees intending to quit after a return-to-office mandate, a couple being blocked from suing Uber over a car crash because of their terms and conditions and much more!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello everybody, and welcome to this afternoon edition of Canadian
keem Trends. That's a bit of an illusion to a
story we will be doing later about chemtrails in Canada,
because Kemp trails are we're still talking about mtrails like
it's two thousand and eight or something. What's the first
we'll get to that we'll get to. We'll get to
the Kemp trail discussion because obviously we are arbiters of
(00:24):
truth on this podcast. But the truth is in here,
the truth is in here, the truth is in your ears.
Welcome to the Dailyeitgeist Trending episode.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
I'm Miles. I'm joined by Andrew T. Jack's a little
bit under the weather, so I had to have had
to tagging this up. He's okay, he's okay.
Speaker 1 (00:42):
We had to spray a bunch of chemicals above his
house really just to really help you really up up
the immune system. But obviously, the first thing that everyone's
talking about is the vice presidential debate. We talk a
little bit more in depth on that in tomorrow morning's episode,
but I think a lot of people the gist of
it is for those who didn't watch, like Andrew T,
(01:06):
is that yeah, sure, Yeah, it's kind of like what
the takeaway is, Yeah, I don't know yet.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
I would my my.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
Usually the way I handle these things is just I
figure it'll be on Twitter, and and it.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Was pretty much what I thought, which is like it
was nothing.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Yeah, everyone's like, yeah, Tim news flash, Tim Wall's too
nice to get dirty on the debate stage and normal.
It's probably a missed opportunity to just curbstop a freak. Yeah,
so that was that's probably bad for the Democrats that that. Yeah,
I think it should have been bad for could have
(01:42):
could have put him, put him in the dirt. But hey,
it's but also Ja d Vance did a pretty good
job of that just with his weird answers. Look, and
then we talked about it Tomorrow Show. I guess style
points to Vance, but in the end his answers were
so bad and chock full of lies that I think
Tim Wallas just walks out of there unscathed.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
I think it's it's a.
Speaker 1 (02:01):
It's a vice presidential debate, you know, like considering that
the highlight of last election cycles vice presidential debate it
was that a fly was on Mike Pence's head. Gives
you gives you an indication of like how much these
things sort of matter in the grand scheme of things,
or what we retained from it. Well, there was a
chance that they could have bade Advance into saying some
(02:22):
like insane like Catholic or just talk about his beliefs
about women or anything, and that didn't happen enough. Yeah, yeah,
I mean he made some he had some really was
like I had a friend who got an abortion and
she doesn't's like, well, yeah, okay, But it's also like,
then if you're a walt that you got to turn
around and be like is she in hell?
Speaker 2 (02:42):
JD? Do you think she does? She a murderer?
Speaker 1 (02:45):
Why isn't she in jail according to your beliefs? Why
didn't you d her cat your life? Yeah, tell me
about that, JD. But yeah, just got to do it.
One thing that I think is relevant because you know,
right now we are still talking about recovery efforts, like
you know, just broadly that are in the aftermath of
Hurricane Helen and JD. Vance's answer on climate change definitely
(03:06):
caught the attention of most people because it was such
a terrible answer. But just to sort of set this
up right, like why just in the context of what's
happening in the country right to Asheville, North Carolina was
one of the hardest hit areas, and prior to that
was being touted by like real estate agents and even
people involved in climate research as like a potential place
that could sort of dodge the chaos of climate change,
(03:28):
as a climate sanctuary, if you will. It's because it's
a place that's far enough off the coast and had
consistent weather. It's it's like with these wonderful mountains, but
you know again those are like that was sort of
the environment in which people said, oh, you know, this
could be a good place to move, aside from the
people who already lived there, but that was like sort
of you know, the outsider's perspective on Nashville.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
The storm showed us that there is no.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
Escaping the effects of climate change, no matter what people
think is going to happen.
Speaker 2 (03:58):
Where the only solution and is truly like radical action.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
So when Vance gave this response on climate, it really
cements the idea that these fucks are just banking on
like dying before the flames and floodwaters consume them.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
That's all it is.
Speaker 1 (04:14):
It's like, I mean, yeah, that's gonna happen, Like, I'm
not going to be here. So this is you, this
is JD. Vance giving a really thoughtful answer on climate
change and how we should be looking at it.
Speaker 3 (04:25):
And or you asked about climate change. I think this
is a very important issue. Look, a lot of people
are justifiably worried about all these crazy weather patterns.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
I think it's important for us, first.
Speaker 3 (04:34):
Of all, to say, Donald Trump and I support clean air,
clean water. We want the environment to be cleaner and safer.
But one of the things that I've noticed some of
our Democratic friends talking a lot about is a concern
about carbon emissions. This idea that carbon emissions drives all
the climate change. Well, let's just say that's true, just
for the sake of argument. Arguing about weird science, let's
just say that's true.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
I'm sorry, weird science.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Let's yeah, let's just presume that the scientists whose expertise
lands in this area is saying it's okay, let's presume
that's true. Okay, go on, JD. Just completely knock this
one out of the park. We're assuming that's true. Go on,
So what's your solution.
Speaker 3 (05:11):
Well, if you believe that, what would you want to
do the answer is that you'd want to reshore as
much American manufacturing as possible, and you'd want to produce
as much energy as possible in the United States of
America because we're the cleanest economy in the entire world, which.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
Is odd because that is already kind of the Biden
Harris's like administration sort of goals is to bring more
of that manufacturing back to Like it's just weird, You're like, yeah, okay,
I mean, is this just another place where the fact
that the Democrats are so right wing plays into the
fucking Republican's hands. Would it just like, yeah, if you know,
(05:47):
Biden Harris had a sensible, actual like cimate change carbon
reduction policy, they wouldn't have to be like, oh, yeah,
we're also doing the right wing thing like are you
talking about bringing more er just bring bring well, you know,
because then you get to say, like, we're bringing the
manufacturing back, et cetera, et cetera. That's not the climate
(06:10):
scientists aren't saying, well, we need to bring the manufacturing back. Yeah,
they're saying fucking cut down the carbon emissions dressed yeah,
and yeah, and I get to like, obviously the Inflation
Reduction Act definitely had like those elements. And because the
bar is so low for American action on climate change,
it is in hit, like verifiably in history, the most
we've done, but there's still so much more to do.
(06:34):
And like the other thing that's also like on the
back of that too, just to raise another thing, like
Donald Trump set up a GoFundMe to help people affected
by the storm.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
And if your first question.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
Is is he's just gonna pocket the money, I would
say you would be of average intelligence because of course
this guy is scamming, Like as of this recording, it's
raised over four million dollars and it has all the
trappings of a Trump cruise, like for starters. He's not
even appearing as one of the top donors, Like he'sn't
even on there, like there's Dana White and Kid Rock
(07:05):
and shit are coming out of their pet's over. Of course, No,
he's a taker. He's he's the recipient of the donation. Second,
the five dollars and the tip jar just to like
get the get and if.
Speaker 2 (07:16):
He does, they'd be like did you see what he
put in? It was movie funny money. I was like
fake money.
Speaker 1 (07:21):
Just so there's an appearance of a bill shaped from object. Yeah,
and then there's like there's all this warm and fuzzy language,
but absolutely no talk, like there's no charity that's been
designated as the recipient for all this money, or even
a plan regarding how the money is spent.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
Hey, let's just help these people out, just get it.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
And I think the final nail in the coffin is
that this thing is being ran by Trump's National Finance Director.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
So this is we'll see.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
I mean, I'm sure he's just going to be like, well,
the thing that would help the people of North Carolina
and all Americans is if I was president. So that
is where this money will go to. Exactly in an
indirect way, I am the solution. I do want to
go back to a little thing, the idea of a
climate sanctuary, like just this fucking like thought that you
(08:08):
could like go to like fucking Minneapolis or New Zealand
or whatever and escape the exact limitation globe. Yeah, and
guess what the world where the idea that this zone
might still be temperate and like livable in some way
is a world where our globe, in our society and
our government has changed. So much like this isn't going
(08:30):
to protect you. We are all in this together. You
think if the other ninety whatever seven percent of the
land mass of the United States is uninhabitable, that your
quote climate sanctuary is going to be fine, that property
laws will exist and whatever. Like, you don't want society
to crumble to the point where a climate union or.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
Climate sanctuary exactly. You can't. You're not going to claim
finders keepers, you know.
Speaker 1 (08:54):
I'm like, actually, guys, we bought this house like ten
years ago, so I know, like this is existential for you,
but like, do you mind, Like I'm trying to have
my roses bloom this year and you guys are taking.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
Out the water that I have. It's just it's not
how that's going to go.
Speaker 1 (09:09):
The other there's this other quote in this article in
The Guardian about like this sort of idea of how
these like like there are these cycles where people move
into places that they think will be like better off
for the future. This is from Jesse Keenan, who's an
expert in climate adaptation at Tulane. So that this flood
will likely accelerate development because clearly there's been a lot
of damage because like in Ashville, right. For every one
(09:32):
person who moves away from Ashville, three people move to Ashville, which.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Is one of the highest ratios in the US.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
Goes on to say, quote, some people will not be
inclined or unable to rebuild, and their properties will be
bought up by wealthy people who can afford to build
private infrastructure and buildings that have the engineering resilience to
withstand floods.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
There is no truly safe place. This is a cycle
that like, okay.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
Acknowledge there will be a post disaster boom, but this
is a cycle that happened over and over again.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
In America on some level.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
So yeah, yeah, I think it's because we live in
a world now where class and your socioeconomic standing insulates
you to a certain degree from certain like ills of
society that society has rocked on us. But it's like
at that point, we're talking mad Max baby, you know what.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
I yeah, there was no like when people have to survive.
Speaker 1 (10:24):
It's a completely different, completely different world, and like to
your point, we don't. My favorite image of this is
just like Elon thinking he's still in charge of the
Mars colony if the rest of the globe is gone, Like, yes.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
I have the key to the food locker and only
I know the code. Well guess what next time you
open that ship, it's on bro. Yeah, and we'll wedge.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
Nerds think fighters keeper is gonna is like is their
defense against their greed?
Speaker 2 (10:54):
And I don't know, revolution or whatever.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
That's what the next case the Supreme Court is going
to your finders v. Keepers and we'll see, we'll see
where they land on that. Okay, chemtrails. Oh this feels
just to start. When did you when did you first
encounter someone talking that caem.
Speaker 2 (11:12):
Trail shit to you?
Speaker 1 (11:13):
Oh? Thank you for the tea up talking to my
face wash. Any someone, anyone who's followed the through line
of all my appearances on Daily Zeitgeist might have picked
up that I don't have a ton of I have
less respect for the medical profession than most people.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
Not because lab you wanted to start up. Yeah, exactly exact.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
I'm just saying, Uh, doctors are not scientists, and neither
are nurses. Like no one who has a medical education.
It's like it's like the way that thinking a mechanical
engineer as a physicist, they are sure yeah, yeah, yeah
you're not. You're not denying the knowledge that they have,
but it's not transposable in the way that they think
it is.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
Well, and it's not.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
It's like like you can have doctors who are creationists
who believe in you know, X or y thing, which
if they were you know, purely logic logical beings, would
be impossible.
Speaker 2 (12:12):
But whatever.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
So the first time I had someone pitch chempfells to
my face, I had had I had walking pneumonia, and
I was at the hospital getting essentially it was just
like a big inhaler. It was it was you know
what it was. It was like the gravity bond of inhalers.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
Okay, like an ebulizer kind of thing, I guess, so,
I don't remember what it was called.
Speaker 1 (12:33):
But it was like a big s glass tube full
of inhaler and they were just jamming it into my
law okay. And the nurse who was administrating this therapy, uh.
And I was a you know, fairly captive audience. Sure, yeah,
you're sick and need dire medical attention was just like,
you know, another reason you might be having these long difficulties.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
No, yo, stay in the lane.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
Crazy to have someone administering medical treatment to you talk
about kemp trails that's fucking dark, which, by the way, yeah,
so KEMP trails.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
I didn't.
Speaker 1 (13:14):
I kind of had a sense that it was just
like a kook thing, but yeah, it's it's just like
the idea that like jets can spray out various chemicals
into the atmosphere, Is that right?
Speaker 2 (13:27):
Like I think, I mean yes, I think, you know,
like mind control weather control type. I think.
Speaker 1 (13:33):
The thing that I really like about this and like
conspiracy theories of this ILK is that like they always
come up with like the most like patently transparently obvious
like way, like if you're the government and you have
a mind control chemical, right, why.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
Would you spray it invisible clouds? Right, has receipts And
they're like yeah, yeah, there it is.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Like it's the same shit, It's the same ship with
all this like you know, like various democratic election fraud things. Right,
if you thought these bozos could do this, why would
they do it in this way? And why wouldn't do
all the other alleged ship if they're if they're so powerful, Well,
because that requires me to find actual evidence when I
(14:24):
can just look for something very superficial and claim you
know what, like why is there like a whole department
devoted to then once the conspiracy is done, creating like
numerological puzzles that they seed out into the world, right, like.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
Hey, hey, we just want to know who the real
ones are? You know that? Get me? Like that's that's hard, right.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
Well, the reason this is coming up because I know
a lot of times as Americans really a Canada and like,
oh mash, they got it all figured out up there
is the premiere of Alberta, their conservative premier, Danielle Smith
just recently, like in front of a bunch of people,
was at a town hall talking about chemtries. Like seriously,
I'm just gonna play this clip where like you can
(15:07):
actually even hear like her constituents groaning, because like, is
this fool for real?
Speaker 2 (15:11):
Take it away, Danielle is.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
The best I have been able to do is talk
to the woman who is responsible for controlling the air
space and she says, no one is allowed to go
up and spray anything in the air.
Speaker 3 (15:24):
We have a house like.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
The US Department of.
Speaker 4 (15:29):
Defense, and you know what, I have some limitations in
my job.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
I don't know that I have power.
Speaker 4 (15:36):
That is the case of the US Department of Defense
is as frames.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
So I'll do what I can, you know, to figure out.
Speaker 1 (15:46):
Power to prevent a foreign government from using chemical weapons
on us. Like, right, she's accusing the United States of
a war crime. Yeah, it's wow because like the thing
was in response to a constituent's question, right, Like she
was prompted by a chemtrail loving constituent. But then her
(16:09):
answer is like, yeah, I don't know, man, like it
could be dealed, like.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
Just shut that ship down.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
But you know what am I supposed to do? You
know what I don't know if I have much power
fit is the Department of Defense. But anyway, whether it
was her or the constituent, the fact that it's like
out there still is just like really funny to me.
But the Pentagon even was like was forced to comment
on the issue that they're like, we're not spraying chemicals
on Alberta, Canada. But that also isn't that what they'd
(16:37):
say if they were spraying chemicals on Alberta chemical on
Alberta Chemical Alberta. But again, the chemtrails are just you know,
contrails there. It's it's vapor trails made up of water.
But too many people are like this is it? No,
they're there, it's all population control. Which is interesting because
back in the nineties, there was an Air Force research
(16:58):
paper called Weather as a four Multiplier, Owning the Weather
in twenty twenty five, and that paper was like the
beginning people like, oh yeah, because it was talking about
a future weather modification system potentially for like military objectives,
and a lot of people in the beginning. Again, like
most conspiracy theories intersect with something that actually happened, because
(17:19):
in the UK and the US, they really did spray
their populations with dangerous chemicals during the Cold War in
order to simulate a chemical warfare attack. So they used
zinc cadmium sulfide, which could be traced with UV light
and they're like, okay, good, we can track it. And
they thought it was non toxic at the time. Learned
out to be potentially carcinogenic.
Speaker 2 (17:39):
But that was like a thrill, right, That's like.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
That's all it takes, right, is like they did it
before and that was bad. I mean also, I mean,
look at that. There's plenty of history of the United
States spraying chemicals down on people Agent Orange. But I
think what's just so funny too, is like people can
never kind of agree on what the chemtrails are for.
And that's that's the hard bit about a conspiracy. Everybody's
kind of got to be united on what they actually
(18:05):
do because also it's like it's just like the worst
way to do something like a just a cloud, like
it's impossible to control. Oh, your big conspiracy got fucked
up by the breeze, Like right right, if you're if
you have the goal that these people are stating, this
is not the way to do it. I'm not saying
(18:26):
the government doesn't have these goals. I'm just saying this
mechanism is absurd. Yeah, it's like, yeah, it comes way
to do it. You want to get the most people
at once, hit the water supply just an idea, c
I A or FBI or and I said, whatever you
talking about it help you know what, They've been fucking
poisoning people for years and this is not a such
a good way to do it. All right, let's take
(18:48):
a quick break. We'll be right back to talk some
more stories right after this.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
And we're back. Amazon CEO Andy Jase.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
Now, he has been presiding over a very not controversial,
just very standard like hellscape employer sort of policy which
is like everyone now like that is working at Amazon Corporate,
they must be.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
They're required for a full time return.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
To the office, even though from what I've seen, I
think Amazon's been doing pretty well money wise with people
working from home.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
But this has been a thing.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
It's like, come next year, everybody is back in the office.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
I don't want to hear shit about it.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
Well, it looks like he's hearing a lot of shit
because there was a survey done just like asking the
employees what they think, and about almost seventy three percent said, oh, yeah,
I'm probably gonna I'll probably quit if this is for real,
to be fair, that feels like some real front mass shit.
(20:00):
It's a way like like a real front ye, Like yeah,
you know these people.
Speaker 2 (20:06):
I mean that's the heart.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
That's the hard part obviously about toiling is that, yeah,
it's like and go away and you're like.
Speaker 2 (20:12):
Oh, yeah, I mean you got me.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
But you've seen this has happened at plenty of other
companies before instituting like full time return, and then they're like, oh,
some people actually did quit because they realized they would
take less money to have more flexibility for family time
or just whatever else.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
I mean, people will quit, but also it will not
help anything. It will simply make things worse.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
Like just yeah, everyone is presentful for having a commute,
and like, yeah, this is like they have I guess
a broader strategy because they want to quote streamline operations
and reduce managerial layers. And that's how they'll do that
by having people come more come in five days a week.
Yeah yeah, I we shall see. But the thing, the
other thing that they're pissed off is like this isn't
(20:57):
like across every Amazon company or subsidiary. So people who
work at like one Medical, which is another subsidiary, they
only have to come in three times a week, and
they're like, yeah, that's it, that's it. Yeah, So it's
pretty fractured. I totally understand like the hesitance for people
to do that, and maybe who knows, maybe there will
be enough outrage that they go, all right, like fucking
(21:17):
twice a week.
Speaker 2 (21:18):
I don't know, please.
Speaker 1 (21:20):
I think the other thing we always talk about this
is like so much of it is for managers to
feel like they are managers and they are managing human beings.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
And then the other part is those commercial building leases.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Yeah, you're playing a lot of money for that thing.
To just look like a look Cinema Gundale if you
know what I mean, if you catch my drift, find
out more on that tomorrow. And then finally Uber shockingly,
they're pulling a bit of a Disney Plus and by
that I mean family friendly brand Uber. No, surely not,
(21:55):
surely not Uber. When you're here, you're not family into
MIDI one, John, I mean whoayy so here? A New
Jersey appeals court has found that a couple cannot sue
over a life altering car accident they were in in
like during an Uber ride because and I think because
(22:18):
I already said to Disney Plus the apps terms and
conditions basically preclude them from doing so. The couple says,
we didn't even agree to that. That was our daughter
using Uber eats, and they're like, well, that's kind of
It's sorry, it's a blanket fucking agreement. Man, Like you're
you go into arbitration. That's it is what it is.
This couple, John and Georgia McGuinty. They filed a lawsuit
(22:40):
in February twenty twenty three. This was a year after
they suffered quote serious physical, psychological, and financial damages when
the Uber they were riding crashed into another car. There
are physical scars, mental scars, and I don't think that
they will ever be able to go back to their
full capacity that they were at before, says their attorney.
So they tried to sue Ubers like noah, nah, look
(23:01):
at the terms and conditions, and a court was like, oh,
I guess not. And now they are like this couple
is fighting back because like, our kid is a minor
and still it's so, what the how the fuck does
any of this work? Now? I think the difference here
is the outrage around the Disney Plus thing was because
Disney the whole brand is about being familial and family friendly.
Speaker 2 (23:25):
And shit like that.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
So they're like, shit, all right, never mind, whereas this
is like all we've seen is like, oh, yeah, write
your companies, like we'll pay the alter of state labor
laws to They're a lion ass campaign during the last
referendum for to like like enshrine that basically California drivers
will never have any kind of rights. Yeah, yeah, seriously
(23:48):
fucking disgusting. It was most lion asked shit I've seen
in quite a long time.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
Yeah, clips only by all these anti don't even other proposition. Yeah,
that are sponsored Apartment Association to California. Now, this is
a little bit of California inside baseball, because you know,
not every state has like voter initiated ballots.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
California baseball has never been stronger. Bro, Yeah, ay, shout
out show Hey.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
But there's a proposition Prop thirty three that's about like
actually creating affordable housing. And the realtors and landlwered like groups,
they have so much money that they have an all
out pressure campaign now like this like single black mom,
she's like, I'm a single mom. Yeah, And I thought
when I heard about Prop thirty three it would be
a good thing. But then when I read the finer print,
(24:36):
I realized this is actually bad for affordable housing.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
And they have so many versions of this ad.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
They have like a former Broadly professor, Yeah, with his
like landlord ys in the ad you were say, they
very clearly it's like this bill would alter existing red
control laws and it's just like like they couldn't be
able to leave out like in favor of tenants, Like yeah, exactly.
It's basically it expands the municipality's ability to enact rent control.
(25:05):
That's what it's doing to expand the ability. It's going
to get rid of laws. Yeah, the backwards ones that
were exacerbating the problem.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
Not to be like.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
It is truly like comical. The list of evil people
at the end of this is.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Fine almost not going to see it.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
No, I just want to just read up because like
when you because every time you just have to look
at the like you know, the fine print on who
is actually paying for this and No. One thirty three
let's see, uh, businesses, landlords, realtors.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
It's like the National Realtors associations. There's no no clearer.
Like sometimes you're at the ballot box. Sometimes you're at
the thing and you're like, oh fuck, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (25:51):
Try to at least find out who's pushing for this,
because pops and landlords are always on the wrong side
of making your life better.
Speaker 2 (25:59):
If I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
If you see chamber of commerce, that's really the one
that's pretty much goes across like look at the endorsement. Yes,
if you see that, if if multiple chambers of commerce
are like, yeah, hey man, we got to get behind
this thing that's saying that's the rich people saying they're
going to come far back for you.
Speaker 2 (26:16):
Yeah. Yeah, the normal person.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
So anyway, a bit of what is happening here anyway,
that's going to do it for us today. We'll be
back tomorrow with a brand new episode. We hope you
like it. Until then, take care yourselves, take care of
each other, get the vaccine, get your flu shots. No
know nothing about white supremacy, Keep Palace time free and
we will talk to y'all later. Bye.
Hello everybody, and welcome to this afternoon edition of Canadian
keem Trends. That's a bit of an illusion to a
story we will be doing later about chemtrails in Canada,
because Kemp trails are we're still talking about mtrails like
it's two thousand and eight or something. What's the first
we'll get to that we'll get to. We'll get to
the Kemp trail discussion because obviously we are arbiters of
(00:24):
truth on this podcast. But the truth is in here,
the truth is in here, the truth is in your ears.
Welcome to the Dailyeitgeist Trending episode.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
I'm Miles. I'm joined by Andrew T. Jack's a little
bit under the weather, so I had to have had
to tagging this up. He's okay, he's okay.
Speaker 1 (00:42):
We had to spray a bunch of chemicals above his
house really just to really help you really up up
the immune system. But obviously, the first thing that everyone's
talking about is the vice presidential debate. We talk a
little bit more in depth on that in tomorrow morning's episode,
but I think a lot of people the gist of
it is for those who didn't watch, like Andrew T,
(01:06):
is that yeah, sure, Yeah, it's kind of like what
the takeaway is, Yeah, I don't know yet.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
I would my my.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
Usually the way I handle these things is just I
figure it'll be on Twitter, and and it.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Was pretty much what I thought, which is like it
was nothing.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Yeah, everyone's like, yeah, Tim news flash, Tim Wall's too
nice to get dirty on the debate stage and normal.
It's probably a missed opportunity to just curbstop a freak. Yeah,
so that was that's probably bad for the Democrats that that. Yeah,
I think it should have been bad for could have
(01:42):
could have put him, put him in the dirt. But hey,
it's but also Ja d Vance did a pretty good
job of that just with his weird answers. Look, and
then we talked about it Tomorrow Show. I guess style
points to Vance, but in the end his answers were
so bad and chock full of lies that I think
Tim Wallas just walks out of there unscathed.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
I think it's it's a.
Speaker 1 (02:01):
It's a vice presidential debate, you know, like considering that
the highlight of last election cycles vice presidential debate it
was that a fly was on Mike Pence's head. Gives
you gives you an indication of like how much these
things sort of matter in the grand scheme of things,
or what we retained from it. Well, there was a
chance that they could have bade Advance into saying some
(02:22):
like insane like Catholic or just talk about his beliefs
about women or anything, and that didn't happen enough. Yeah, yeah,
I mean he made some he had some really was
like I had a friend who got an abortion and
she doesn't's like, well, yeah, okay, But it's also like,
then if you're a walt that you got to turn
around and be like is she in hell?
Speaker 2 (02:42):
JD? Do you think she does? She a murderer?
Speaker 1 (02:45):
Why isn't she in jail according to your beliefs? Why
didn't you d her cat your life? Yeah, tell me
about that, JD. But yeah, just got to do it.
One thing that I think is relevant because you know,
right now we are still talking about recovery efforts, like
you know, just broadly that are in the aftermath of
Hurricane Helen and JD. Vance's answer on climate change definitely
(03:06):
caught the attention of most people because it was such
a terrible answer. But just to sort of set this
up right, like why just in the context of what's
happening in the country right to Asheville, North Carolina was
one of the hardest hit areas, and prior to that
was being touted by like real estate agents and even
people involved in climate research as like a potential place
that could sort of dodge the chaos of climate change,
(03:28):
as a climate sanctuary, if you will. It's because it's
a place that's far enough off the coast and had
consistent weather. It's it's like with these wonderful mountains, but
you know again those are like that was sort of
the environment in which people said, oh, you know, this
could be a good place to move, aside from the
people who already lived there, but that was like sort
of you know, the outsider's perspective on Nashville.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
The storm showed us that there is no.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
Escaping the effects of climate change, no matter what people
think is going to happen.
Speaker 2 (03:58):
Where the only solution and is truly like radical action.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
So when Vance gave this response on climate, it really
cements the idea that these fucks are just banking on
like dying before the flames and floodwaters consume them.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
That's all it is.
Speaker 1 (04:14):
It's like, I mean, yeah, that's gonna happen, Like, I'm
not going to be here. So this is you, this
is JD. Vance giving a really thoughtful answer on climate
change and how we should be looking at it.
Speaker 3 (04:25):
And or you asked about climate change. I think this
is a very important issue. Look, a lot of people
are justifiably worried about all these crazy weather patterns.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
I think it's important for us, first.
Speaker 3 (04:34):
Of all, to say, Donald Trump and I support clean air,
clean water. We want the environment to be cleaner and safer.
But one of the things that I've noticed some of
our Democratic friends talking a lot about is a concern
about carbon emissions. This idea that carbon emissions drives all
the climate change. Well, let's just say that's true, just
for the sake of argument. Arguing about weird science, let's
just say that's true.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
I'm sorry, weird science.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Let's yeah, let's just presume that the scientists whose expertise
lands in this area is saying it's okay, let's presume
that's true. Okay, go on, JD. Just completely knock this
one out of the park. We're assuming that's true. Go on,
So what's your solution.
Speaker 3 (05:11):
Well, if you believe that, what would you want to
do the answer is that you'd want to reshore as
much American manufacturing as possible, and you'd want to produce
as much energy as possible in the United States of
America because we're the cleanest economy in the entire world, which.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
Is odd because that is already kind of the Biden
Harris's like administration sort of goals is to bring more
of that manufacturing back to Like it's just weird, You're like, yeah, okay,
I mean, is this just another place where the fact
that the Democrats are so right wing plays into the
fucking Republican's hands. Would it just like, yeah, if you know,
(05:47):
Biden Harris had a sensible, actual like cimate change carbon
reduction policy, they wouldn't have to be like, oh, yeah,
we're also doing the right wing thing like are you
talking about bringing more er just bring bring well, you know,
because then you get to say, like, we're bringing the
manufacturing back, et cetera, et cetera. That's not the climate
(06:10):
scientists aren't saying, well, we need to bring the manufacturing back. Yeah,
they're saying fucking cut down the carbon emissions dressed yeah,
and yeah, and I get to like, obviously the Inflation
Reduction Act definitely had like those elements. And because the
bar is so low for American action on climate change,
it is in hit, like verifiably in history, the most
we've done, but there's still so much more to do.
(06:34):
And like the other thing that's also like on the
back of that too, just to raise another thing, like
Donald Trump set up a GoFundMe to help people affected
by the storm.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
And if your first question.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
Is is he's just gonna pocket the money, I would
say you would be of average intelligence because of course
this guy is scamming, Like as of this recording, it's
raised over four million dollars and it has all the
trappings of a Trump cruise, like for starters. He's not
even appearing as one of the top donors, Like he'sn't
even on there, like there's Dana White and Kid Rock
(07:05):
and shit are coming out of their pet's over. Of course, No,
he's a taker. He's he's the recipient of the donation. Second,
the five dollars and the tip jar just to like
get the get and if.
Speaker 2 (07:16):
He does, they'd be like did you see what he
put in? It was movie funny money. I was like
fake money.
Speaker 1 (07:21):
Just so there's an appearance of a bill shaped from object. Yeah,
and then there's like there's all this warm and fuzzy language,
but absolutely no talk, like there's no charity that's been
designated as the recipient for all this money, or even
a plan regarding how the money is spent.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
Hey, let's just help these people out, just get it.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
And I think the final nail in the coffin is
that this thing is being ran by Trump's National Finance Director.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
So this is we'll see.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
I mean, I'm sure he's just going to be like, well,
the thing that would help the people of North Carolina
and all Americans is if I was president. So that
is where this money will go to. Exactly in an
indirect way, I am the solution. I do want to
go back to a little thing, the idea of a
climate sanctuary, like just this fucking like thought that you
(08:08):
could like go to like fucking Minneapolis or New Zealand
or whatever and escape the exact limitation globe. Yeah, and
guess what the world where the idea that this zone
might still be temperate and like livable in some way
is a world where our globe, in our society and
our government has changed. So much like this isn't going
(08:30):
to protect you. We are all in this together. You
think if the other ninety whatever seven percent of the
land mass of the United States is uninhabitable, that your
quote climate sanctuary is going to be fine, that property
laws will exist and whatever. Like, you don't want society
to crumble to the point where a climate union or.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
Climate sanctuary exactly. You can't. You're not going to claim
finders keepers, you know.
Speaker 1 (08:54):
I'm like, actually, guys, we bought this house like ten
years ago, so I know, like this is existential for you,
but like, do you mind, Like I'm trying to have
my roses bloom this year and you guys are taking.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
Out the water that I have. It's just it's not
how that's going to go.
Speaker 1 (09:09):
The other there's this other quote in this article in
The Guardian about like this sort of idea of how
these like like there are these cycles where people move
into places that they think will be like better off
for the future. This is from Jesse Keenan, who's an
expert in climate adaptation at Tulane. So that this flood
will likely accelerate development because clearly there's been a lot
of damage because like in Ashville, right. For every one
(09:32):
person who moves away from Ashville, three people move to Ashville, which.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Is one of the highest ratios in the US.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
Goes on to say, quote, some people will not be
inclined or unable to rebuild, and their properties will be
bought up by wealthy people who can afford to build
private infrastructure and buildings that have the engineering resilience to
withstand floods.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
There is no truly safe place. This is a cycle
that like, okay.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
Acknowledge there will be a post disaster boom, but this
is a cycle that happened over and over again.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
In America on some level.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
So yeah, yeah, I think it's because we live in
a world now where class and your socioeconomic standing insulates
you to a certain degree from certain like ills of
society that society has rocked on us. But it's like
at that point, we're talking mad Max baby, you know what.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
I yeah, there was no like when people have to survive.
Speaker 1 (10:24):
It's a completely different, completely different world, and like to
your point, we don't. My favorite image of this is
just like Elon thinking he's still in charge of the
Mars colony if the rest of the globe is gone, Like, yes.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
I have the key to the food locker and only
I know the code. Well guess what next time you
open that ship, it's on bro. Yeah, and we'll wedge.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
Nerds think fighters keeper is gonna is like is their
defense against their greed?
Speaker 2 (10:54):
And I don't know, revolution or whatever.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
That's what the next case the Supreme Court is going
to your finders v. Keepers and we'll see, we'll see
where they land on that. Okay, chemtrails. Oh this feels
just to start. When did you when did you first
encounter someone talking that caem.
Speaker 2 (11:12):
Trail shit to you?
Speaker 1 (11:13):
Oh? Thank you for the tea up talking to my
face wash. Any someone, anyone who's followed the through line
of all my appearances on Daily Zeitgeist might have picked
up that I don't have a ton of I have
less respect for the medical profession than most people.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
Not because lab you wanted to start up. Yeah, exactly exact.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
I'm just saying, Uh, doctors are not scientists, and neither
are nurses. Like no one who has a medical education.
It's like it's like the way that thinking a mechanical
engineer as a physicist, they are sure yeah, yeah, yeah
you're not. You're not denying the knowledge that they have,
but it's not transposable in the way that they think
it is.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
Well, and it's not.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
It's like like you can have doctors who are creationists
who believe in you know, X or y thing, which
if they were you know, purely logic logical beings, would
be impossible.
Speaker 2 (12:12):
But whatever.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
So the first time I had someone pitch chempfells to
my face, I had had I had walking pneumonia, and
I was at the hospital getting essentially it was just
like a big inhaler. It was it was you know
what it was. It was like the gravity bond of inhalers.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
Okay, like an ebulizer kind of thing, I guess, so,
I don't remember what it was called.
Speaker 1 (12:33):
But it was like a big s glass tube full
of inhaler and they were just jamming it into my
law okay. And the nurse who was administrating this therapy, uh.
And I was a you know, fairly captive audience. Sure, yeah,
you're sick and need dire medical attention was just like,
you know, another reason you might be having these long difficulties.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
No, yo, stay in the lane.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
Crazy to have someone administering medical treatment to you talk
about kemp trails that's fucking dark, which, by the way, yeah,
so KEMP trails.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
I didn't.
Speaker 1 (13:14):
I kind of had a sense that it was just
like a kook thing, but yeah, it's it's just like
the idea that like jets can spray out various chemicals
into the atmosphere, Is that right?
Speaker 2 (13:27):
Like I think, I mean yes, I think, you know,
like mind control weather control type. I think.
Speaker 1 (13:33):
The thing that I really like about this and like
conspiracy theories of this ILK is that like they always
come up with like the most like patently transparently obvious
like way, like if you're the government and you have
a mind control chemical, right, why.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
Would you spray it invisible clouds? Right, has receipts And
they're like yeah, yeah, there it is.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Like it's the same shit, It's the same ship with
all this like you know, like various democratic election fraud things. Right,
if you thought these bozos could do this, why would
they do it in this way? And why wouldn't do
all the other alleged ship if they're if they're so powerful, Well,
because that requires me to find actual evidence when I
(14:24):
can just look for something very superficial and claim you
know what, like why is there like a whole department
devoted to then once the conspiracy is done, creating like
numerological puzzles that they seed out into the world, right, like.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
Hey, hey, we just want to know who the real
ones are? You know that? Get me? Like that's that's hard, right.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
Well, the reason this is coming up because I know
a lot of times as Americans really a Canada and like,
oh mash, they got it all figured out up there
is the premiere of Alberta, their conservative premier, Danielle Smith
just recently, like in front of a bunch of people,
was at a town hall talking about chemtries. Like seriously,
I'm just gonna play this clip where like you can
(15:07):
actually even hear like her constituents groaning, because like, is
this fool for real?
Speaker 2 (15:11):
Take it away, Danielle is.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
The best I have been able to do is talk
to the woman who is responsible for controlling the air
space and she says, no one is allowed to go
up and spray anything in the air.
Speaker 3 (15:24):
We have a house like.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
The US Department of.
Speaker 4 (15:29):
Defense, and you know what, I have some limitations in
my job.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
I don't know that I have power.
Speaker 4 (15:36):
That is the case of the US Department of Defense
is as frames.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
So I'll do what I can, you know, to figure out.
Speaker 1 (15:46):
Power to prevent a foreign government from using chemical weapons
on us. Like, right, she's accusing the United States of
a war crime. Yeah, it's wow because like the thing
was in response to a constituent's question, right, Like she
was prompted by a chemtrail loving constituent. But then her
(16:09):
answer is like, yeah, I don't know, man, like it
could be dealed, like.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
Just shut that ship down.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
But you know what am I supposed to do? You
know what I don't know if I have much power
fit is the Department of Defense. But anyway, whether it
was her or the constituent, the fact that it's like
out there still is just like really funny to me.
But the Pentagon even was like was forced to comment
on the issue that they're like, we're not spraying chemicals
on Alberta, Canada. But that also isn't that what they'd
(16:37):
say if they were spraying chemicals on Alberta chemical on
Alberta Chemical Alberta. But again, the chemtrails are just you know,
contrails there. It's it's vapor trails made up of water.
But too many people are like this is it? No,
they're there, it's all population control. Which is interesting because
back in the nineties, there was an Air Force research
(16:58):
paper called Weather as a four Multiplier, Owning the Weather
in twenty twenty five, and that paper was like the
beginning people like, oh yeah, because it was talking about
a future weather modification system potentially for like military objectives,
and a lot of people in the beginning. Again, like
most conspiracy theories intersect with something that actually happened, because
(17:19):
in the UK and the US, they really did spray
their populations with dangerous chemicals during the Cold War in
order to simulate a chemical warfare attack. So they used
zinc cadmium sulfide, which could be traced with UV light
and they're like, okay, good, we can track it. And
they thought it was non toxic at the time. Learned
out to be potentially carcinogenic.
Speaker 2 (17:39):
But that was like a thrill, right, That's like.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
That's all it takes, right, is like they did it
before and that was bad. I mean also, I mean,
look at that. There's plenty of history of the United
States spraying chemicals down on people Agent Orange. But I
think what's just so funny too, is like people can
never kind of agree on what the chemtrails are for.
And that's that's the hard bit about a conspiracy. Everybody's
kind of got to be united on what they actually
(18:05):
do because also it's like it's just like the worst
way to do something like a just a cloud, like
it's impossible to control. Oh, your big conspiracy got fucked
up by the breeze, Like right right, if you're if
you have the goal that these people are stating, this
is not the way to do it. I'm not saying
(18:26):
the government doesn't have these goals. I'm just saying this
mechanism is absurd. Yeah, it's like, yeah, it comes way
to do it. You want to get the most people
at once, hit the water supply just an idea, c
I A or FBI or and I said, whatever you
talking about it help you know what, They've been fucking
poisoning people for years and this is not a such
a good way to do it. All right, let's take
(18:48):
a quick break. We'll be right back to talk some
more stories right after this.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
And we're back. Amazon CEO Andy Jase.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
Now, he has been presiding over a very not controversial,
just very standard like hellscape employer sort of policy which
is like everyone now like that is working at Amazon Corporate,
they must be.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
They're required for a full time return.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
To the office, even though from what I've seen, I
think Amazon's been doing pretty well money wise with people
working from home.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
But this has been a thing.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
It's like, come next year, everybody is back in the office.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
I don't want to hear shit about it.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
Well, it looks like he's hearing a lot of shit
because there was a survey done just like asking the
employees what they think, and about almost seventy three percent said, oh, yeah,
I'm probably gonna I'll probably quit if this is for real,
to be fair, that feels like some real front mass shit.
(20:00):
It's a way like like a real front ye, Like yeah,
you know these people.
Speaker 2 (20:06):
I mean that's the heart.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
That's the hard part obviously about toiling is that, yeah,
it's like and go away and you're like.
Speaker 2 (20:12):
Oh, yeah, I mean you got me.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
But you've seen this has happened at plenty of other
companies before instituting like full time return, and then they're like, oh,
some people actually did quit because they realized they would
take less money to have more flexibility for family time
or just whatever else.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
I mean, people will quit, but also it will not
help anything. It will simply make things worse.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
Like just yeah, everyone is presentful for having a commute,
and like, yeah, this is like they have I guess
a broader strategy because they want to quote streamline operations
and reduce managerial layers. And that's how they'll do that
by having people come more come in five days a week.
Yeah yeah, I we shall see. But the thing, the
other thing that they're pissed off is like this isn't
(20:57):
like across every Amazon company or subsidiary. So people who
work at like one Medical, which is another subsidiary, they
only have to come in three times a week, and
they're like, yeah, that's it, that's it. Yeah, So it's
pretty fractured. I totally understand like the hesitance for people
to do that, and maybe who knows, maybe there will
be enough outrage that they go, all right, like fucking
(21:17):
twice a week.
Speaker 2 (21:18):
I don't know, please.
Speaker 1 (21:20):
I think the other thing we always talk about this
is like so much of it is for managers to
feel like they are managers and they are managing human beings.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
And then the other part is those commercial building leases.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Yeah, you're playing a lot of money for that thing.
To just look like a look Cinema Gundale if you
know what I mean, if you catch my drift, find
out more on that tomorrow. And then finally Uber shockingly,
they're pulling a bit of a Disney Plus and by
that I mean family friendly brand Uber. No, surely not,
(21:55):
surely not Uber. When you're here, you're not family into
MIDI one, John, I mean whoayy so here? A New
Jersey appeals court has found that a couple cannot sue
over a life altering car accident they were in in
like during an Uber ride because and I think because
(22:18):
I already said to Disney Plus the apps terms and
conditions basically preclude them from doing so. The couple says,
we didn't even agree to that. That was our daughter
using Uber eats, and they're like, well, that's kind of
It's sorry, it's a blanket fucking agreement. Man, Like you're
you go into arbitration. That's it is what it is.
This couple, John and Georgia McGuinty. They filed a lawsuit
(22:40):
in February twenty twenty three. This was a year after
they suffered quote serious physical, psychological, and financial damages when
the Uber they were riding crashed into another car. There
are physical scars, mental scars, and I don't think that
they will ever be able to go back to their
full capacity that they were at before, says their attorney.
So they tried to sue Ubers like noah, nah, look
(23:01):
at the terms and conditions, and a court was like, oh,
I guess not. And now they are like this couple
is fighting back because like, our kid is a minor
and still it's so, what the how the fuck does
any of this work? Now? I think the difference here
is the outrage around the Disney Plus thing was because
Disney the whole brand is about being familial and family friendly.
Speaker 2 (23:25):
And shit like that.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
So they're like, shit, all right, never mind, whereas this
is like all we've seen is like, oh, yeah, write
your companies, like we'll pay the alter of state labor
laws to They're a lion ass campaign during the last
referendum for to like like enshrine that basically California drivers
will never have any kind of rights. Yeah, yeah, seriously
(23:48):
fucking disgusting. It was most lion asked shit I've seen
in quite a long time.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
Yeah, clips only by all these anti don't even other proposition. Yeah,
that are sponsored Apartment Association to California. Now, this is
a little bit of California inside baseball, because you know,
not every state has like voter initiated ballots.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
California baseball has never been stronger. Bro, Yeah, ay, shout
out show Hey.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
But there's a proposition Prop thirty three that's about like
actually creating affordable housing. And the realtors and landlwered like groups,
they have so much money that they have an all
out pressure campaign now like this like single black mom,
she's like, I'm a single mom. Yeah, And I thought
when I heard about Prop thirty three it would be
a good thing. But then when I read the finer print,
(24:36):
I realized this is actually bad for affordable housing.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
And they have so many versions of this ad.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
They have like a former Broadly professor, Yeah, with his
like landlord ys in the ad you were say, they
very clearly it's like this bill would alter existing red
control laws and it's just like like they couldn't be
able to leave out like in favor of tenants, Like yeah, exactly.
It's basically it expands the municipality's ability to enact rent control.
(25:05):
That's what it's doing to expand the ability. It's going
to get rid of laws. Yeah, the backwards ones that
were exacerbating the problem.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
Not to be like.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
It is truly like comical. The list of evil people
at the end of this is.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Fine almost not going to see it.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
No, I just want to just read up because like
when you because every time you just have to look
at the like you know, the fine print on who
is actually paying for this and No. One thirty three
let's see, uh, businesses, landlords, realtors.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
It's like the National Realtors associations. There's no no clearer.
Like sometimes you're at the ballot box. Sometimes you're at
the thing and you're like, oh fuck, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (25:51):
Try to at least find out who's pushing for this,
because pops and landlords are always on the wrong side
of making your life better.
Speaker 2 (25:59):
If I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
If you see chamber of commerce, that's really the one
that's pretty much goes across like look at the endorsement. Yes,
if you see that, if if multiple chambers of commerce
are like, yeah, hey man, we got to get behind
this thing that's saying that's the rich people saying they're
going to come far back for you.
Speaker 2 (26:16):
Yeah. Yeah, the normal person.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
So anyway, a bit of what is happening here anyway,
that's going to do it for us today. We'll be
back tomorrow with a brand new episode. We hope you
like it. Until then, take care yourselves, take care of
each other, get the vaccine, get your flu shots. No
know nothing about white supremacy, Keep Palace time free and
we will talk to y'all later. Bye.
The Daily Zeitgeist News
Hosts And Creators
Jack O'Brien
Miles Gray
Show Links
StoreAboutRSSLive AppearancesPopular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
Today’s Latest News In 4 Minutes. Updated Hourly.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.