AMERICAS VOICE LIVE WITH STEVE GRUBER, FEBRUARY 4TH, 2025

SEGMENT 1: A NEW AMERICA UNDERWAY

SEGMENT 2: TRUMP CABINET PICKS FACE CRUCIAL VOTES

SEGMENT 3: PRESIDENT TRUMP DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE OVAL OFFICE

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to America's Voice Live.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
Our Real America's Voice team is going places others won't.

Speaker 1 (00:08):
We need to take over.

Speaker 3 (00:09):
That was think coming into Israeli territory.

Speaker 1 (00:12):
To show you what they don't want you to see.
It's still a disaster. What's the latest?

Speaker 3 (00:17):
They call these street releases. You've got hundreds of people
being dropped off. It's getting worse.

Speaker 1 (00:21):
And we're the nation's fastest growing news program for a reason.

Speaker 3 (00:25):
Real journalize that they're all marching down to the White House.

Speaker 2 (00:28):
Sounds to me bad, like they're won't be happy until
Israel doesn't exist.

Speaker 4 (00:31):
Real American News America is under chemical warfare attack.

Speaker 3 (00:35):
Fat noyl is the weapon. Thank you for everything you're doing.
I appreciate you guys very very much.

Speaker 1 (00:41):
This is America's Voice Live with Steve Grouper. Oh do
America's Voice Live. I'm Steve Gerber.

Speaker 2 (00:49):
Today is Tuesday, the fourth of February. Let's get to
the day's top choice. As always, Thank you so much,
we're spending time with us here in Real America's Voice.
The Senate has voted to advance to Gabbard's confirmation and
giving it a good favorable statement from Senator Tom consaying
he can't wait to work with her.

Speaker 1 (01:05):
She gets out of Committee nine to eight.

Speaker 2 (01:07):
Also, ICE is starting operationis in Aurora, Colorado, with a
Trump administration saying they are allowed to detain the illegals
in Buckley Air Force Base and then later Luisiana Center.
Bill Castley releasing a statement saying he will vote for
RFK Junior in the full confirmation vote as AHHS Secretary,
making it easier for him to earn his confirmation. Looks

(01:28):
like Tulca and Bobby are both going to make it.
But let's start here. Let's go over what has happened
in just the past couple of days, not including.

Speaker 1 (01:36):
Those stories, all right, not including those stories.

Speaker 2 (01:39):
Donald Trump is just beginning his third week on the job,
but the last twenty four or forty eight hours have
been even more intense in the first two weeks, which
I know is pretty hard to believe. First, Panama agreed
to suspend it to deal with China and and its
involvement in the Belton Road initiative. And we'll be putting
America back in the lead role in controlling the Panama
Canal going forward as it should be. It was the

(01:59):
first big policy win for the new Secretary of Saint
Marco Rubio, who was very effective in forging the deal,
and it's a very big deal. Then Mexico gave in
to the demands of President Trump and begged him not
to unleash the twenty five percent tariffs as proposed, and
in return, Mexico promises to put ten thousand troops on
the border to help secure it on both sides, Americans

(02:19):
on one side, Mexicans on the other. Mexico says it
will also step up efforts to end the flow of
illegal drugs in the United States, and the US will
stem the flow of illegal guns back to Mexico.

Speaker 1 (02:30):
As a result of Mexico agreeing.

Speaker 2 (02:32):
To President Trump's to do list, the chairs will be
on hold for thirty days.

Speaker 1 (02:35):
We'll review.

Speaker 2 (02:36):
Then President Trump signed an executive order for the United
States to establish a sovereign wealth fund for the country.
Pretty remarkable and flowed the idea that such a fund
could monetize the assets side of the American balance sheet,
maybe even by TikTok as an example. I don't know
if that'll happen, but we'll see. Other nations, by the way,
have such funds. Nations like Norway, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, and

(02:57):
of course.

Speaker 1 (02:58):
China, among others.

Speaker 2 (03:00):
During the day, it became clear that the ongoing evaluation
of us AID was going to be that the payments
were going to be suspended for a while, and Marco
Rubio said that he would be the acting director of
the globalist slush fund for all things left. Another great
decision for Elon Musk and the team a doge and
predictably the left they went nuts, calling it unconstitutional and
a constitutional crisis, neither of which appears to be true.

(03:22):
The crisis is that USAID didn't didn't report her account
to anybody. They were completely unaccountable. That was the real problem.
And then later in the day, Greenland announced that it
would be allowing the United States to dramatically increase its
military presence on the critical island and signaling that a
bigger change could soon be on the way.

Speaker 1 (03:42):
So that's happening.

Speaker 2 (03:43):
Late in the day, there was another win for President
Trump when Maine Senator Susan Collins now she would be
supporting Tulsea Gabbart. That went through today, of course, and
this is yesterday. As the Director of National Intelligence, it
was un indicate Gabbard one of the president's most controversial
selections to his team is going to have the votes
for confirmation. I mentioned a moment ago and then maybe
the biggest news of the day when out going Canadian

(04:05):
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also folded the Trump's demands to
stem the flow of illegal aliens and illegal drugs coming
from the northern border in Canada to avoid getting hit
with twenty five percent tariffs at midnight. In fact, it
sounded like Canada gave a lot more to avoid the
tariffs and sanctions than anyone else so far, because Canada
also agreed to spend one point three.

Speaker 1 (04:24):
Billion dollars beating up border security.

Speaker 2 (04:27):
They're going to dispatch another ten thousand frontline personnel to
the border, named the Mexican drug cartels as terrorist organizations,
and even put a so called fentanyl Czar in place
to address the problem of fentanyl.

Speaker 1 (04:40):
I mean, let's be honest about this.

Speaker 2 (04:41):
For most presidents, that's well, that had been a pretty
consequential year, maybe a consequential term. And for Donald Trump,
it was just Monday in the Oval Office. Oh did
I mention he also took time to meet and hang
out with the Stanley Cup champion Florida Panthers. I mean,
President Trump is seventy eight years old, and he's a
sheen focused on just one thing, making America the most

(05:02):
powerful nation on earth and putting America first every single
time to make sure that happens. And again, anyone who
questions his resolve, well, you do so at your own peril.

Speaker 1 (05:12):
When Donald Trump.

Speaker 2 (05:13):
Says he's going to do something as the forty seventh president,
he damn well means it. And unlike the first time around,
he now has a team around him that believes in
everything he's doing and is backing his play every step
of the way. This is what it's like to see
the Golden Age of America unfold in front of our
eyes using the power of the biggest economy in the world.
Is paying off big so far, and it sounds like

(05:34):
it's just the beginning. Listen to this.

Speaker 5 (05:37):
You've disagreed before, but and I'm sure they didn't have
any idea what they were talking about, because already you
see what's happening.

Speaker 3 (05:45):
Look at Columbia, Look at what happened with that.

Speaker 5 (05:49):
Everybody said that with Columbia it was going to be
a disaster in one in one hour, everything was settled.
You know why tariffs tariffs. Without tariffs, they wouldn't have
been the same way. They would not have treated me
the way they treated me, which was extremely nicely. And

(06:11):
I don't want to use countries. I don't want to
use names.

Speaker 3 (06:14):
But tariffs are very powerful, both.

Speaker 5 (06:17):
Economically and in getting everything else you want. Tariff for us,
nobody can compete with us because with a pot of gold.
But if we don't keep winning and keep doing well,
we won't be the pot of gold, and then tariffs
won't be so good for us. But when you're the
pot of gold, the tariffs are. The tariffs are very good.
They're very powerful, and they're going to make our country

(06:38):
very rich.

Speaker 2 (06:38):
Again, very rich again. He says, well, so far it's worked.
On the other side. However, there are those that think, well,
the threat of tariffs are going to blow up result
in a trade war for the United States. I mean,
just yesterday morning, why you to enjoy this? Just yesterday morning,
Senator Chuck schumrom New York was preaching doom and gloom

(06:59):
for the game next weekend.

Speaker 1 (07:01):
Yeah, he was pretty worried about some things here. It is.

Speaker 6 (07:05):
Let's just take Super Bowl Sunday. Okay, it's going to
affect beer. Okay, most of it Corona here comes from Mexico.
It's going to affect your guac because what is guacamole?
Nade of avocados, both from Mexico. If you have pizza,

(07:25):
it's going to affect the cost of cheese.

Speaker 5 (07:29):
He doesn't want any pain at his Super Bowl party. Caroline,
what do you have to say about that very interesting show?
And tell?

Speaker 1 (07:37):
Well, you know, I dove Caroline Levitt do this, but
let me. Jack Schumer has no clue.

Speaker 2 (07:43):
He's completely out of touch with the American people. He
seems to think that people care more about beer and
guacamole than they do about a secure border or fentnyl poison.
You see, people like Chuck who are worried about guaca
and pizza don't understand that Americans don't care about those things.
Not really. They care about big things, things like making
America the most respected country on Earth.

Speaker 1 (08:03):
Again, sorry, Chuck, you're luck.

Speaker 2 (08:05):
He thinks that Mexican beer are somehow more important than
one hundred thousand Americans, mostly young Americans, that'll dive this
year from federal poisoning.

Speaker 1 (08:13):
I mean, how up too?

Speaker 2 (08:14):
Is can you be Chuck, Are you really that stupid
or do you think we are. Let me tell you, Chuck,
we're not, which is why, by the way, you are
not now and will never be again, the majority leader ever.
Your time has passed, along with most of the Democrat Party.
But don't worry, Chuck. We've got this. We'll take it
from here. And like usual, those on the other side

(08:37):
either don't understand what's really going on, or they do
and they're good with it. Neither is acceptable. By the way,
listen to this.

Speaker 7 (08:44):
This is the art of the deal. This is who
Donald Trump is. I just want to emphasize that this
is a drug war and not a trade war. Every
day we lose about two hundred Americans from fittanyl poisoning.
We lose more Americans every year from fittannel poisoning than
we did during the entire Vietnam War. So to President Trump,
this is very serious. It's good to see Mexico and

(09:05):
Canada both step up to the plate and say we're
going to be responsible for our side of the border.
I want to emphasize one more thing is that a
lot of these fentanyl precursors are now being made in
laboratories in Canada, so mister Trudeau needs to be smashing
those laboratories up as well. So a great day for
President Trump, a huge victory for America.

Speaker 2 (09:24):
Yeah, another call out to Justin Trudeau. By the way,
that Senator Roger Marshall explaining why this makes sense.

Speaker 1 (09:32):
It's a drug war, not a trade war.

Speaker 2 (09:35):
We're trying to save one hundred thousand American lives, among
other things, and stop the human trafficking and recover three
hundred and twenty thousand missing children in this country lost
by the previous administration. And while all of that was
going on, speaking of Justin Trudeau as soon to be
former Prime minster of Canada with his twenty five percent
approval numbers, and he was moaning and whimpering and saying
something about being great friends with America, and you're being mean,

(09:58):
Donald Trump, You're being mean here he is.

Speaker 8 (10:03):
Together, we've built the most successful economic, military, and security
partnership the world has ever seen. A relationship that has
been the envy of the world. Yes, we've had our
differences in the past, but we've always found a way
to get past them. As I've said before, if President

(10:28):
Trump wants to usher in a new Golden Age for
the United States. The better path is to partner with Canada,
not to punish us.

Speaker 1 (10:40):
Not to punish us.

Speaker 2 (10:41):
Of course, within a few hours of that drivel, Trudeau
had completely capitulated because even he knows of America and
Donald Trump dropped the economic hammer, it will be his
country that has bludgeoned financially and they will be far
worse off than their American neighbors. Yes, there are going
to be some rough days ahead, but this was one

(11:01):
of the most menace days I've ever witnessed. When you
pile up significant accomplishments of the man, those on the
left and in the corporate media, and of course democrats
want to hate and denigrate no matter what he accomplishes,
no matter what he does for this country.

Speaker 1 (11:16):
That's very good.

Speaker 2 (11:18):
What he's been doing quite consistently so far is delivering
on his promises and delivering American victories over everything in
our path. Whether it's a country like Columbia trying to
stop the repatriation of illegals back to their country, or
Venezuela doing the same, or Mexico posturing for a trade war,
or Canada doing the same, none of it really seems
to matter because President Trump was riding through them like

(11:40):
hot butter, and he seems to be having some fun
doing it.

Speaker 1 (11:43):
Look at the look on his face.

Speaker 2 (11:44):
And remember these were some of the things he did
on Monday. But remember everything he's doing, he's doing this
with his eye on where this nation will be in
a year or two or three.

Speaker 1 (11:55):
That's what it's about.

Speaker 2 (11:56):
So in summary, Mexico caved to President Trump's demands to
help secure the border. Only took a few hours as
they begged him not to roll out those promised twenty
five percent tarifs on anything coming from Mexico. Canada caved
in a few hours later and offered even more in
their submission.

Speaker 1 (12:12):
Greenland, by the way, said the.

Speaker 2 (12:14):
US can expand broadly there immediately good news. Panama canceled
it's deal with China, stopping the belt and wrote initiatives
dead in its tracks. Usaid getting shredded as Trump launched
a sovereign wealth fund for Americans too, And it looks
like Taulca Gabbart has the votes to get confirmed along
with Bobby Kennedy. Yeah, it's Tuesday, we're just getting warmed up.

Speaker 1 (12:39):
We'll take a.

Speaker 2 (12:39):
Break here in America's Voice Live when I come back.
The Taulsi Gathered confirmation vote advanced to the full Senate.
It's good news. We'll talk about it with Brian Glenn
around the corner.

Speaker 3 (12:59):
Well.

Speaker 1 (12:59):
In a pivotal day.

Speaker 2 (13:00):
On Capitol Hill, the Senate poise to cast decisive votes
on two of President Trump's high profile nominees, former Representative
Tulca Gabbard for Secretary of Stated Robert F. Kennedy Junior
for the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The outcomes
of these votes will significantly influence the administration's foreign and
domestic policies. Of course. Joining now to discuss this our
chief White House correspondent, Brian Glenn. Brian, nice to see

(13:23):
you there on the Law and I know that they're
getting ready for BB Nutt and Yahoo to come through.
There's some things being organized behind you. A nice day
to be out there. It's sunny, but inside today two
of the committees along party lines fourteen thirteen.

Speaker 3 (13:37):
Robert F.

Speaker 1 (13:37):
Kennedy Junior makes it through.

Speaker 2 (13:38):
There was some questions about it, whether you get the
support he did nine to eight.

Speaker 1 (13:42):
Taulsea Gabbard gets through.

Speaker 2 (13:43):
So both of these will be reported to the floor
of the Senate for full confirmation votes.

Speaker 1 (13:48):
I've got to be honest, Brian, these were.

Speaker 2 (13:50):
The two that I thought were the most likely to
face an uphill battle.

Speaker 1 (13:53):
It looks to me like they're both gonna make it.
What do you think, Yeah, it's a good day, Steve.
I agree with you.

Speaker 9 (14:01):
Those are two of the nominations that I think we
all had a little bit of doubt that they would
get fully confirmed, and we knew some of the pushback,
and we didn't really care what the Democrats had to
say about any one of these two individuals, and we
really didn't care how who and the GOP had a
problem with these two nominees as well. I mean, we
kind of know what we're faced with, the challenges that
are head and this is what President Trump wants. This

(14:24):
is this is his cabinet. As I like to say,
this is not any senator's cabinet. This is President Trump's cabinet.
I'm glad that this vote is still gonna is going
to push on and looks like we're going to get
them confirmed.

Speaker 1 (14:35):
And they're gonna do a great job.

Speaker 9 (14:37):
Both both of them, I feel like, are excellent candidates
for both those positions. So good days are ahead of us,
and I'm just glad to kind of get this over.
I want to get these nominations done so we can
kind of move on to really kind of getting the wheels. Yeah,
I get to get the wheels behind the movement going.

Speaker 3 (14:56):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (14:56):
And Doug Collins confirmed today is the VA director.

Speaker 3 (15:00):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (15:01):
You don't even hear that. Make the headlines hardy.

Speaker 2 (15:03):
So the next big one, of course is Cash but
tell and I guess reading the tea lely is the
way I read him. If Tulsey makes it and Bobby
makes it, I think Cash is clean sailing.

Speaker 1 (15:17):
Yeah, I think you're right.

Speaker 9 (15:18):
And actually he was the one, in my personal opinion,
that had the cleanest track record, had the cleanest background,
if you will, for forgetting support. I mean, this guy
was bulletproof and and he's been nothing but transparent to
what he will do and what he have said.

Speaker 3 (15:33):
In the past.

Speaker 9 (15:34):
They've tried to smear him on several things. It didn't
it didn't work. No, Cash Hotel is in an excellent position,
uh for this nomination, and I think that he will
do exactly what he said he was doing and really
put these people out in the field to fight real crime.
And why do We have so many people in the
FBI based here in Washington, d C. Doing what you know, wait,

(15:56):
waiting for their next appointment, waiting for the next job,
instead of going out and actually doing their job and
really pushing back or resisting to weaponize the Department of
Justice and go ahead and do what the FBI was
designed to do, Steve, and that was to protect Americans
and put criminals behind bars. So it looks like he's
going to move forward.

Speaker 3 (16:17):
I like Cash.

Speaker 9 (16:18):
I think he's a great person, and I think he'll
do excellent at that position.

Speaker 2 (16:23):
Sure, now, let me just tell you something here to
just cross the way a few minutes ago from the
Wall Street Journal, I'll share this.

Speaker 1 (16:29):
Look, it's just Tuesday, and.

Speaker 2 (16:30):
Every day there's big news happening, and I would say
this is big news. Donald Trump is set to ban
transgender girls and women from female school sports. That would
be an executive or the NCAA as indicated it will
move rapidly to change.

Speaker 1 (16:44):
Its rules in the face of such an order.

Speaker 2 (16:46):
So when it comes to gender and culture wars, this
has been number one. Riley Gaines has been out front
on this for a long time. A warrior trying to
protect women's sports. It looks like it's going to pay
off in spades because it looks like Donald Trump's going to
sign the executive order banning transgender girls and transgender women
from competing in female sports at the high school and college.

(17:09):
Look another big win, another promise capped as he moves
through his first couple of weeks in office.

Speaker 1 (17:16):
Right.

Speaker 3 (17:18):
Yeah, and this.

Speaker 9 (17:18):
Is no surprise to want to us that have been
on this campaign for so long. This is one of
the biggest talking points, Steve, that he's had at any rally.
When he mentions those two things, especially when it comes
to kids, he gets an overwhelmingly applause. I mean, you
can take you can take fiscal policy, economic policy, foreign policy,

(17:39):
those are great, but when it comes to those particular topics,
he gets the most support. So it does not surprise
me that he's doing that tomorrow. Uh, with the support
of everyone in the conference. I would imagine if there's
a Republican out there right now that doesn't agree with that,
then they probably need to reevaluate their purpose of serving
the American people because it's overwhelmingly uh therefore that so yeah,

(18:02):
but if you real quickly, I know that let me
see there'scuss a movement. I know that we've got Prime
Minister Nahu coming through here at four o'clock. He is
going to meet with the President briefly. He's gonna pull
Let me step by the way, Steven, I'll show you
real quickly.

Speaker 3 (18:17):
I know.

Speaker 9 (18:17):
If I'm running short on time, just let me know
what I can wrap it up. But he's gonna make
this procession down. What's subscribed here. It's pebble beach right
here in front of all the media dance. He's gonna
make his way over to the west wing. Let's see
if we can swing that camera around, Tony, I'll come
under you swing over, and he's gonna make his way
and that's where he's going to meet President Trump. Just

(18:38):
outside those double doors there we you see the two
military gentlemen standing there to welcome them.

Speaker 1 (18:45):
The door will open, uh.

Speaker 9 (18:46):
President Trump will step out, Prime Minister will step out
of the car, they'll shake hands, they'll go inside, and
then around five ten, I think that's exact, is when
they're going to have this kind of joint meeting. It's
a press conference, and that's when our cameras will be
inside there to.

Speaker 1 (19:02):
Cover all of that.

Speaker 9 (19:03):
But just very historical day right here at the White House.
This is the first time that he's had a foreign
leader to the White House in this second term.

Speaker 1 (19:11):
So hey, world, peaces on.

Speaker 9 (19:13):
It's on the agenda, and this is a second phase
in this So let's see if President Trump can make
it happen and.

Speaker 1 (19:22):
We'll find out.

Speaker 2 (19:23):
Brian, it's been a very busy week and it's all
of Tuesday, mid afternoon. I don't know how you keep up,
my friend. I don't know how Donald Trump does it,
to be honest, because we're having a hard time keeping
up with headline headline headline. But keep the faith, my friend,
and we'll keep checking in on you.

Speaker 1 (19:39):
Thank you, Brian. All right, Steve, thank you. There you
have it, Brian Glynn.

Speaker 2 (19:45):
By the way, just a quick recap here Mexico Cave, Panama,
Cave Columbia, Cave Venezuela, Canada.

Speaker 1 (19:51):
They both caved.

Speaker 2 (19:52):
You got mass deportations underway. Hostages are coming home. The
EI programs are going away. FBI is cleaning up its act.
US AID money is being stopped until they can figure
out where they're spending their money. There's been a ban
now on men and women's sports. Border crossings down ninety
three percent, and it's Tuesday, Tuesday. Most would consider that

(20:16):
a pretty good year, maybe a pretty good term as present. Yeah,
that's a couple of days at the White House. Currently
coming up after the break. That Trump administration is starting
its deportation everton, Aora, Colorado. Now, we'll talk about that
next year on AVL. Well, locking the border is in

(20:41):
full swing, Deporting illegals in full swing. The first US
military aircraft carring detained the illegal aliens to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,
is departing today as the Trump administration prepares to house
tens of thousands of illegals at the naval base there
in Cuba. The US military also has stated that it
will allow immigration customs enforcement to detain illegals at the

(21:01):
Buckley Space Force Base that's in a rural Colorado's changing.

Speaker 1 (21:06):
That's one of the focal.

Speaker 2 (21:07):
Points of trende Iragua joining me now to discuss this
as our Real America's Voice correspondent Roger Hudson. He's in
our Denver newsroom. Roger, Good afternoon. So Buckley, you mentioned
to me in the break, there's where air force one
comes in when when a president is visiting Colorado, and
now it's going to be a place where illegals get
to make their I guess their farewells.

Speaker 5 (21:29):
Yeah.

Speaker 10 (21:29):
What's really interesting is it's like four miles away from
those apartment buildings that we all saw in that ring
video where those TDA members were knocking on those doors
with those big guns. So this really was, as Donald
Trump said when he visited Aurora, Colorado, ground zero for immigration,
illegal immigration all around the country. And I've visited there

(21:50):
every time a president comes. That's where you go to
see the president and report on them. It is not
a glamour gig for these immigrants that are going to
go out of there. There's no there's no there's no house,
there's no apartments, there's nothing like that. So they're going
to be housed in airplane hangar as they're waiting to
be put on a plane.

Speaker 1 (22:07):
C forty and Jeff.

Speaker 10 (22:08):
Started out of their country to whatever their final destination
is going to be.

Speaker 1 (22:13):
Right, you're right there in the Greater Denver area.

Speaker 2 (22:15):
And it's interesting to me, Roger because when the trend
ay Rock and that footage was first released of those
gang members busting in that door. Guns everywhere, handguns, long guns,
everything well armed, to say the least.

Speaker 1 (22:29):
Those in the Biden administration. So that's not real. That
didn't really happen.

Speaker 2 (22:32):
And then they went on to say, well, they only
took over a few.

Speaker 1 (22:36):
Apartment complex sure, and actually a few apartment complexes.

Speaker 2 (22:40):
And we're just on hold on Rogers going to hold
you right there. Donald Trump was in the Oval office.
He's making some comments. I want to go there right now.

Speaker 3 (22:50):
We're doing very well with respect to.

Speaker 5 (22:53):
Other countries, really behaving on taking the criminals that they
sent into our country and them out. These there some
of the worst people on earth, and they're getting out
and they're being accepted back in their countries, as you heard,
without exception. So a lot of people thought that was
not gonna happen, but it's happening very full force.

Speaker 3 (23:15):
Now we're getting some.

Speaker 5 (23:16):
Very very dangerous people out of our country, which is
very important.

Speaker 3 (23:21):
Will perhaps we'll go through the first one place.

Speaker 4 (23:23):
Yes, sir, so earlier today, before the press came in,
you signed a commission appointing Chris Wright to be your
next Secretary of Energy. We have another commission prepared for
your signature, sir. This is Doug Collins to be Secretary
of the VA, Doug Collins of Georgia.

Speaker 3 (23:41):
Two very good men. Okay, thank you, sir. Next up,
in light of.

Speaker 4 (24:03):
By a number of bodies of the United Nations which
exhibit a deep anti American bias, we have an executive
order prepared for your attention that would withdraw the United
States from the UN Human, would withdraw the United States
from the UNRWA, which is a refugee organization, and would
also review American involvement in UNESCO, which has also exhibited

(24:28):
anti American bias.

Speaker 3 (24:30):
More generally, the executive.

Speaker 4 (24:32):
Order calls for a review of American involvement and funding
in the UN in light of the wild disparities and
levels of funding among different countries that, as you've expressed previously,
as deeply unfair to the United States.

Speaker 3 (24:48):
So I've always.

Speaker 5 (24:48):
Felt that the UN has tremendous potential. It's not living
up to that potential right now. It really isn't, hasn't
for a long time.

Speaker 3 (24:57):
It has. There are great hopes for it, but.

Speaker 5 (25:02):
It's not being well run, to be honest, and they're
not doing the job. A lot of these conflicts that
we're working on should be settled, or at least we
should have some help in settling them.

Speaker 3 (25:13):
We never seem to get help.

Speaker 5 (25:14):
That should be the primary purpose of the UN, the
United Nations, and uh, again it's got great potential, and
based on the potential.

Speaker 3 (25:22):
Will continue to go along with it. But they gotta
get their act together.

Speaker 11 (25:31):
What would they need to do sort of get in
their act together.

Speaker 5 (25:34):
Well, they're gonna be fair to countries that deserve fairness. Uh,
they have some countries as you know, that are outliers
that are very bad and they're being almost preferred as
countries to those that, uh do their job and are
doing a good job.

Speaker 3 (25:50):
And they have to really, they're gonna end up losing
a lot of countries.

Speaker 5 (25:54):
They're gonna end up losing their credibility like other organizations,
and then they're gonna be nothing. The potential of the
United Nations, and not everybody agrees with me on the
potential of the United Nations is fantastic if properly run.

Speaker 3 (26:08):
So we'll see what happens.

Speaker 11 (26:10):
How much money are you going to take away from that?

Speaker 5 (26:13):
Well, we're taking away a little bit, but we're not
looking to take away money.

Speaker 3 (26:17):
Well, this is so important that we're really as you know.

Speaker 5 (26:20):
The United Nations is largely funded by US, and it
shouldn't be should be funded by everybody, but we're disproportionate,
as we always seem to be. But it's something that
if it ever lived up to the potential in ten minutes,
it would make up the difference.

Speaker 3 (26:36):
That's the kind of power it could have. Right now,
it doesn't have that power.

Speaker 4 (26:41):
Next, sir, this is a national security presidential memorandum that
seeks to impose maximum pressure on the government of the
Islamic Republic of Iran. Many of these provisions are similar
to actions that your administration took during your first administration.
The basic idea here is to have every department in agents,

(27:02):
or in many departments and agencies in your government attempt
to sanction and control Iranian activities, particularly relating to the
Iranian nuclear program and the Iranian export of terrorism through
support of various proxy groups abroad. And the intent here
is to give you all of the possible tools to
i'd say, engage with the Iranian government to ensure that

(27:25):
going forward they are less of a malign actor on
the world stage.

Speaker 5 (27:29):
So this is one that I'm torn about. Everybody wants
me to sign it. I'll do that. It's very tough
on Iran. Is what we had before, we would have
never had the problem. You would have never had October seventh.
We would have never had the problem had the election
gone a different way, which it should have. But this
one I think more than made up for it. I

(27:51):
think we're doing things and it chose more than made
up for much more.

Speaker 3 (27:55):
Historic the Iran situation.

Speaker 5 (27:58):
Hopefully, I'm going to tell you, but hopefully we're not
gonna have to use it very much. We will see
whether or not we can arrange or work out a
deal with Iran and everybody can live together. And maybe
that's possible, and maybe it's not possible. So I'm signing this,
and I'm unhappy to do it, but I really have

(28:20):
not so much choice because we have to be strong
and firm, and I hope that it's not gonna have
to be used in any great measure at all. It'd
be great if we could have a Middle East and
maybe a world at total peace.

Speaker 3 (28:35):
Right now. You don't have that. When I left, you
had peace all over the world, and now you have
the world is blowing up. As you know.

Speaker 5 (28:42):
BB is coming in to see me later. Others are
coming in to see me. We'll see what we can do.
But I'm signing this and hopefully it will be a
document which won't be very important.

Speaker 3 (28:53):
We'll hardly have to be used. So what kind of
deal would you be paid?

Speaker 5 (28:58):
Well, we're going to see, I mean we're going to see. Uh,
they cannot have a nuclear weapon with me. It's very simple.
Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Oh did you say, Uh,
we don't wanna be tough on Iran. We don't wanna
be tough on anybody, but they just can't have a.

Speaker 12 (29:11):
Nuclear conversations with your kind of partner rounds.

Speaker 13 (29:16):
I would do you wanna blocked the sale of Iranian
oil to other names?

Speaker 3 (29:20):
Well, we have the right to do that, and that's
what I did before. And they had no money.

Speaker 5 (29:25):
They wouldn't have had the money for Hamas or Hisbela
and anybody else.

Speaker 3 (29:29):
Uh. I just uh, it could have been solved this thing.

Speaker 5 (29:33):
It just if things went the way they should have,
this would have been.

Speaker 3 (29:38):
Over long ago. But it's not over.

Speaker 13 (29:42):
How most I think Randy is to developing nuclear.

Speaker 5 (29:45):
We I think it's close. I think you're close. They're
too close. But again, you could go back four years.
I would've said they would have had it during this
intervening period.

Speaker 3 (29:54):
Uh, but they're pretty close, Peter, And why so do
you run to have you to sign it?

Speaker 13 (29:58):
If it's Iran and their proxys who have threatened to
retaliate against you and your team by killing you guys
or taking out soul of money.

Speaker 5 (30:08):
Well they haven't done that, and that would be a
terrible thing for them to do, not because of me.
If they did that, they would be obliterated.

Speaker 3 (30:18):
That would be the end. I've left instructions.

Speaker 5 (30:21):
If they do it, they get obliterated, there won't be
anything left. And they should be able to do it.
And Biden should have said that, but he never did.

Speaker 3 (30:29):
I don't know why.

Speaker 5 (30:30):
Lack of intelligence perhaps, but he never said it. If
that happens to a leader or close to a leader, frankly,
if you had other people involved also, you would call
for total obliteration of a state that did it. That
would include Oren. So I'm signing this and it's a
very powerful document, but hopefully we're not going to have

(30:52):
to use.

Speaker 12 (30:53):
Mister President, if the Prime Minister today were to ask
your help in striking at Ron's nuclear facilities to prevent
the kind of progress towards a nuclear weapon.

Speaker 1 (31:05):
Would you give him the green light?

Speaker 12 (31:07):
Would get either to do it himself or for the
US to participate with him.

Speaker 5 (31:11):
I don't know that that's what he's gonna be asking for.
I have no idea that, as you're telling me, we're
gonna have a pretty long meeting, we're gonna be discussing
a lot of things.

Speaker 3 (31:20):
Not only that, but a lot of things.

Speaker 5 (31:22):
And uh, I'll let you know if the time comes
to let you know, But right now, that's not something
that I can discuss.

Speaker 12 (31:30):
Suppose when you just said, when you said, if they
do it, they get obliterate. Just to be clear, you're
talking about if Iran made another made an attempt on.

Speaker 5 (31:37):
When you're like, yeah, that would be called total obliteration.

Speaker 3 (31:43):
Uh.

Speaker 5 (31:44):
And I can't imagine they do that. It should have
been stated by Biden, but he didn't state it because
he had no clue. As you know, as everybody, what.

Speaker 11 (31:55):
Is your vision actually for uh?

Speaker 3 (31:58):
The Rose? You know, that's all we got my vision.

Speaker 11 (32:01):
For a relationship with Duran and and would.

Speaker 5 (32:03):
You I'd love to have a good relationship with everybody.
They can't have a nuclear weapon. I was my only
it was the only thing that was very important. They
can't have a nuclear weapon.

Speaker 7 (32:14):
Uh.

Speaker 5 (32:15):
Beyond that, I you know, it would be very tough
if they insist on doing that. They have some of
their leadership, I can tell you right now, And maybe
you know it, maybe you don't, but there are many
people at the top ranks of Iran that do not
want to have.

Speaker 3 (32:30):
A nuclear weapon, just for that very reason.

Speaker 4 (32:33):
Mister President, what the reaction is China's recalatory cares.

Speaker 3 (32:37):
That's fine, that's fine.

Speaker 5 (32:39):
We're gonna do very well against China and against everybody
else right now. Uh, they've taken advantage of the Biden
administration like I've never seen.

Speaker 3 (32:48):
I've never seen.

Speaker 5 (32:49):
The deficit with China is about at trinion dollars. Think
of it a trinion dollars. They're they're using our money
to build their military and Bible let that happen. You know,
we're taking a lot of fires here. We we came back,
this is like a different place. The good news is
we're doing very well. We're doing well with countries that

(33:10):
nobody expected would do well with. We are respected again
as a nation, maybe at a level that people haven't
seen for many, many decades.

Speaker 3 (33:19):
But when I left we didn't have any wars.

Speaker 5 (33:23):
I defeated Isis, one of the Isis caliphate, and now
the world seems to be ready to blow up.

Speaker 3 (33:29):
But we'll see if we can stop it kind of shield.

Speaker 11 (33:35):
Have you reached out to the Iranians about any kind
of deal to start those wars?

Speaker 3 (33:38):
I mean I have nothing.

Speaker 5 (33:40):
I say, I'm one that doesn't care whether I reach
out or they reach out. A lot of people said,
look them reach out Sir.

Speaker 3 (33:46):
To me, doesn't matter. It's just it's just talk. But
I want to.

Speaker 5 (33:53):
See everybody do well. I want to see great countries
and I want to see peace in the Middle East
and elsewhere. We're also working very hard with respect to
Russia Ukraine. That's a bloodbath. It's a total bloodbath. What's
going on there is incredible. What's going on with the soldiers,
young young soldiers being killed by the thousands, I mean
literally by the thousands. And we want to see if

(34:15):
we can get this up. And I think we've had
some very good talks.

Speaker 13 (34:18):
Maybe update on when you were speak to President Jeser
any updated when you would speak a president.

Speaker 5 (34:22):
You no, we'll speak. I'm at the appropriate time. I'm
in no rush I'm in no rush appropriately you.

Speaker 13 (34:27):
Think that motization can lend itself to the type of
freeze that it meant for the Terras burd for Canada, and.

Speaker 3 (34:34):
Well, we'll see what happens.

Speaker 5 (34:36):
Well, there's a short term please with Mexico as you know,
and with UH Canada. But they've agreed to be very
very strong on the border, stronger than they ever were
by far by a factor of about thirty. And in
addition to that, as you can see, we've been strong
because we've had numbers like you've never seen before. I mean,
the border is now closed, really closed. And with that

(34:58):
being said, we're letting good people come through, and we
want the good people to come into our country, but
the border is closed.

Speaker 11 (35:06):
Is your talks with the president where the Prime Minister
met Yon today?

Speaker 10 (35:09):
Do you intend to press him about how many deaths
have been amongst Palestinians?

Speaker 3 (35:13):
Are you concerned about that? I talk about that too.
You know, both sides mean a lot. Uh, I talk.

Speaker 5 (35:19):
About that, I talk about the other side and talk
about everything.

Speaker 11 (35:22):
What's your main message to him today during your meeting?

Speaker 5 (35:25):
Well, I'm here to listen. He's here to see me,
and I'm here to listen. So will you continue the
right time I'll give my men.

Speaker 11 (35:32):
President, will you continue to press uh for in the sight?
Do you get that Jordan and Egypt take Palestinians from comany?

Speaker 5 (35:37):
Yeah, I would like to see Jordan. I'd like to
see Egypt. UH take some look. The Gaza thing has
not worked. It's never worked. And I feel very differently
about Gaza than a lot of people.

Speaker 3 (35:50):
I think they.

Speaker 5 (35:50):
Should get a good, fresh, beautiful piece of land, and
we get some people to put up the money to
build it and make it nice and make it uh
habitable and enjoyable.

Speaker 11 (36:04):
You want to leave, the mean say they don't want
to live.

Speaker 5 (36:06):
I don't know how they could want to stay. It's
a demolition site. It's a pure demolition site. If we
could find the right piece of land, or numerous pieces
of land and build them some really nice places, there's
plenty of money in the area, that's for sure. I
think that would be a lot better than going back
to Kaza, which has had just decades and decades of death.

Speaker 11 (36:31):
Where would those pieces of land be.

Speaker 5 (36:33):
They could be in Jeordia, and they could be in Egypt,
they could be in other places. You could have more
than two more than one, But you could have more
than two, and you'd have people living in a place
that could be very beautiful, but safe and nice.

Speaker 3 (36:49):
Guys, has been a disaster for decades. Would the US
pay for that? I don't think.

Speaker 4 (36:56):
For you.

Speaker 5 (36:56):
I don't think you I would pay. But I think
there's plenty of people that would in the area. They
have a lot of money. They certainly have a lot
of money. Some of the countries over there, they'd like
to see it. I know that Saudi Arabia wants to
see peace. I can see that, and many of the
countries there, as far as I'm concerned, they all want peace.
I think, you know, maybe I'm wrong in this, but

(37:16):
I think Iran would like to see peace too.

Speaker 3 (37:18):
They've had enough, don't you think they've had enough?

Speaker 12 (37:20):
But the leaders of Egypt and Jordan have said, luckily,
they have.

Speaker 3 (37:25):
No interest in doing this.

Speaker 5 (37:26):
Well, they may have said that, but a lot of
people said things to me. They said they wouldn't take
anybody back in Venezuela. And right now they're flying them
right back into Venezuela and a lot of people and
they're doing the right thing.

Speaker 3 (37:37):
In Venezuela.

Speaker 5 (37:39):
The Panama canal is an active discussion right now. They
said things about that, and virtually everything that's been said
has been incorrectly stated based on the result because the.

Speaker 4 (37:52):
Mount also be displaced, that amount of forcibly displacing these
people from Gazas.

Speaker 3 (37:56):
I don't think so.

Speaker 5 (37:57):
I think if they had the opportunity, they'd love if
they had alternative. To God, they have no alternative right now.
I mean they're there because they have no alternative.

Speaker 3 (38:06):
What do they have? It is a big pile of
rubble right now. I mean, have you.

Speaker 5 (38:12):
Seen the pictures of it? Have you been there? It's
terrible to live. Who can live like that? And very
dangerous and shooting all over the place. Is bombing all
over the place on both sides.

Speaker 8 (38:24):
Now.

Speaker 3 (38:24):
I would think if they had an option of moving
to an either in.

Speaker 5 (38:28):
A large group or various smaller groups and take care
of the close to two million people, I would think
that they would be thrilled to do. They have no
you know when you say about the Gaza strip, they
don't have an option.

Speaker 3 (38:41):
To say, they'd be very dangerous. To God. Oh, I
think they'd love to leave Gas if they had an option.
Right now, they don't have an option. What are they
going to do?

Speaker 5 (38:49):
They have to go back to Gaza, but what is
Gazen is practically not a building standing, and they're very dangerous.

Speaker 3 (38:57):
You know, those buildings are shifting.

Speaker 5 (38:58):
And they're falling down all over the place, and and
there's gun fire all over.

Speaker 3 (39:05):
It's gonna be that way for a while.

Speaker 11 (39:06):
Mister President, wouldn't have it made more sense to back
to what people while the war was ongoing, rather than
now when there's a ceasefire.

Speaker 3 (39:14):
Which is what you're talking about it.

Speaker 11 (39:15):
But it was more dangerous when there were strikes overhead
than now.

Speaker 5 (39:19):
Well, the strikes could start tomorrow. There's not a lot
to there's not a lot left to strike. Is that
it's a demolition side. The whole place is demolished. It's unsafe,
it's unsanitary, it's uh not.

Speaker 3 (39:34):
A place where people want to live.

Speaker 5 (39:36):
Nobody nobody's got it's they they have no alternative but
to go back.

Speaker 3 (39:40):
If we gave them an.

Speaker 5 (39:41):
Alternative of living in a beautiful, open place with some
you know, nice quarters, they're nice housing of sorts, and we.

Speaker 3 (39:51):
Have the money in the Middle East to build that.

Speaker 11 (39:53):
Do you support Israeli's actually moving back and create a
set of.

Speaker 5 (39:56):
Builds necessarily, and no, I just support uh cleaning it
up and doing something with it. But it's failed for
many decades and somebody will be sitting here in ten
years or twenty years from now and they'll be going
through the same stuff. The wars, and you know, they've
had civilizations on Gaza, many civilizations on Gaza, and they're buried.

Speaker 3 (40:20):
In the sand. It doesn't seem to work.

Speaker 11 (40:25):
Him. Start the case, start elon Musk. How often are
you talking to him?

Speaker 2 (40:29):
And how there have been ideas that he's brought to
you that you've said, oh.

Speaker 11 (40:32):
No, wait a minute, this is going a little too far.

Speaker 5 (40:34):
Well, many ideas, but look he's done a great job.
Look at all the fraud that he's found in this
US aid. It's a disaster. What the people radical left lunatics.
They have things that nobody would have believed the whole
thing with one hundred million spent on you know what,

(40:54):
with money going to all sorts of groups that shouldn't
deserve to get any money with the money, I'd like
to see what the kickbacks are, how.

Speaker 3 (41:01):
Much money has been kicked back?

Speaker 5 (41:03):
Who would spend that kind of money to some of
the things that you read about, and I read about,
and I see every night of the news and every
morning when I read the papers.

Speaker 3 (41:11):
Who would spend money for that?

Speaker 5 (41:13):
I would say this, the people that got all that money,
are they kicking it back to the people that gave
it from government? Now to me, very very corrupt. The
real question is how much of a kickback has there been?
And one of the things I want to investigate. I think,
to this extent, the train that's being built between Los

(41:35):
Angeles and San Francisco is the worst managed project I
think I've ever seen, and I've seen some of the worst.
Billions and billions, hundreds of billions of dollars over budget.
In fact, I read where you could take every single
person that was going to go on the train and
get the finest limousine service in the world and take

(41:55):
them back and forth with limousines, and you'd have hundreds
of billions of dollars left over. It is the worst thing,
and we're going to start an investigation in that because
it's not possible. I built for a living, and i'd
built on time, on budget. It's impossible that something could
cost that much and now it's not even going to
San Francisco and it's not going to Los Angeles.

Speaker 3 (42:17):
It's they made it.

Speaker 5 (42:19):
Much shorter, so now it's at little places way away
from San Francisco and way away from Los Angeles. No,
we're going to start a big investigation on that because
I've never seen anything like it. Nobody has ever seen
anything like it. The worst overruns that there have ever
been in the history of our country. And it wasn't

(42:40):
even necessary. I would have said, you know, bid you
take an airplane. Of course you're two dollars. Of course
you're nothing. You take an airplane. But this got started.
And if you have to drive, you can drive. They
have hundreds of billions of dollars of cost overruns.

Speaker 3 (42:58):
And it's not even the same project. It's much order.

Speaker 5 (43:00):
It's way outside of San Francisco and way outside of
Los Angeles.

Speaker 3 (43:04):
So we're going to be looking into this person.

Speaker 11 (43:07):
Is that dough just going to investigate the train?

Speaker 3 (43:09):
No, I'm doing that myself.

Speaker 13 (43:11):
Some of these those engineers that Elon Musk has helping
him are as young as nineteen years old.

Speaker 11 (43:15):
Good.

Speaker 3 (43:16):
They're very smart, though, Peter, They're like you, they're very
smart people.

Speaker 11 (43:20):
Has he have you met any of these guys.

Speaker 5 (43:23):
No, I haven't seen them. They work actually out of
the White House. They're smart people. Unlike what they do
in the control towers. Where we need smart people. We
should use some of them in the control towers where
we were putting people that were.

Speaker 3 (43:36):
Actually intellectually deficient.

Speaker 5 (43:39):
That was one of the qualifications, is you could be
intellectually deficient. No, we need smart people. Some are young
and some are not young. Some are not young at all.
But they found great things. Look at the list of things.
Maybe I'll do it tomorrow. I'll read off a list
of fifteen or twenty things that they found inside of
the US AIDS.

Speaker 3 (44:01):
It has to be corrupt. Nobody could approve that.

Speaker 5 (44:04):
They could only approve that if they were getting kickbacks.
You're talking about you're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars, and.

Speaker 13 (44:11):
It sounds like you're going to line down USAID.

Speaker 3 (44:15):
It sounds like it. I think so that when.

Speaker 11 (44:18):
That happens, which part of the government.

Speaker 5 (44:20):
Well, I could see Barco Lubio being in charge State
Department because they're giving money to I mean, some of
the money is well spent, I guess, but much of
it is really fraudulent.

Speaker 11 (44:31):
And on the Education Department.

Speaker 13 (44:33):
Why nominate Linda mcmah to be the Education Department secretary
if you're going to get rid of the education.

Speaker 5 (44:39):
Because I told Linda, Linda, I hope you do a
great job and put yourself out of a job. I
want her to put herself out of a job Education Department.

Speaker 3 (44:49):
So we're ranked number forty out of forty schools. Right
we're ranked number one.

Speaker 5 (44:53):
In costs for pupil, so we spend more for pupil
than any other country in the world. And we're ranked
at the bottom of the list, rank very badly. And
what I want to do is let the States run schools.
I believe strongly in school choice. But in addition to that,
I want the states to run schools, and I want
Linda to put herself out of a job.

Speaker 3 (45:14):
With an executive order.

Speaker 5 (45:16):
I'd like to I would like to be able to
look if I could give the schools back to Iowa
and Idaho and Indiana and all these places that run properly.
There's many of them, I think. So if you look
at the list Denmark, Sweden, Norway, I believe it or not,
China's doing very well on that list. A list of

(45:37):
well educated where they run their school system. Well, you
have a lot of countries not surprising names. I think
that if you moved our schools into some of these
states that are really well run states, they would be
as good as Denmark.

Speaker 3 (45:52):
And Norway and Sweden and some of the other states.

Speaker 5 (45:55):
And then you'd have the laggards, and you know who
they are and don't have to go to it. But
you'd have the laggards, the same laggards that are laggards
with everything else, including crime, but even them, you'll break
it into systems. As an example, you went to New York,
you go to west Chester County, you go to Dutchess County,
you go to Suffolk and Long Island and Nassau and
Long Island. You have maybe six or seven locations, and

(46:18):
you have New York City, which would include the five boroughs.
And I think even that would run much better than
it does right now. Same thing with Los Angeles or California.
You'd have riverside. You'd break it up into six or
sebio but most of them would be states, and you'd
have one like in Iowa. You give it to the

(46:40):
state of Iowa, you give it to the state of Indiana,
you give it.

Speaker 3 (46:43):
These are really well run states.

Speaker 5 (46:45):
They don't have debt, they don't have problems, they don't
have any crimes relatively speaking. To speak up, and you
would have education that would be the equivalent of Norway
and den and various other places that are at the
top of the list. So we're at the bottom of
the list, and we're the most expensive. We're at the

(47:06):
top of the list when it comes to costs for people.
We spend more money per pupil than any other nation
in the world. And yet we're rated number forty. The
last ratings came out. You saw them, So they talk
about forty countries were rated a number forty. And I
say that if we did this, we would we would
go twenty thirty notches up. We could do great and

(47:27):
we would have some of the best districts in the world.

Speaker 3 (47:30):
But are you looking to do that.

Speaker 1 (47:31):
With an executive order, sir?

Speaker 3 (47:32):
Or do you need to work with Congress? Well, there
are some people that say I could. I think I'd
work with Congress.

Speaker 5 (47:37):
I think, look, we'd have to work with the teachers
Union because the teachers Union is the only one that's
opposed to it.

Speaker 3 (47:42):
Nobody else would want to hold it back.

Speaker 5 (47:45):
Look, we have to tell the teachers union, we're rated
last in the world in education. Of the top forty
were rated, we were thirty eight. Now we're forty. We
went to thirty nine, we went to forty. We're thirty seven,
but forty.

Speaker 3 (48:00):
Now. The thing just came out that's under Biden.

Speaker 7 (48:03):
Remember that Secretary of RuView announced the deal this week
that would allow potentially American citizens for criminals to be
put in.

Speaker 3 (48:11):
A different country.

Speaker 12 (48:11):
Is that something you're looking to do.

Speaker 3 (48:14):
I didn't know that he announced it yet, but if
he did, it's fine.

Speaker 5 (48:17):
Yeah, we have hard, hardened criminals, horrible people. You see
him pushing people into subways the train is coming. Last week,
guy walking around and just sees somebody waiting for train.
Trains coming forty miles an hour, and he gets pushed
into the subway.

Speaker 3 (48:35):
And that happens all the time. These are sick people.

Speaker 5 (48:39):
If we could get them out of our country, we
have other countries that would take them.

Speaker 3 (48:43):
They could.

Speaker 5 (48:44):
It's no different than a prison system, except there would
be a lot less expensive, and it would be a
great deterrent send them to other countries. If we could
go a step further, In other words, we're talking about
getting the criminals out of our country that come in
through other countries, right, the illegal migrants, as I call them. Well,
we have people that are just as bad as them

(49:05):
in our country. If we could get them out, I'd
be very happy that would.

Speaker 3 (49:10):
Slimo said that he would wanted you to pay a
fee for that.

Speaker 5 (49:13):
Would you pay that, Well, that's a lot of very
small fee compared to what we pay to private prisons,
and a very very small fee.

Speaker 3 (49:20):
I don't know. We'll have to find that out legally.

Speaker 5 (49:22):
I'm just saying if we had the legal right to
do it, I would do it in a heartbeat.

Speaker 3 (49:27):
I don't know if we do or not. We're looking
at that right now.

Speaker 5 (49:30):
But we could make deals where we'd get these animals
out of our country. And you know, if you take
the shooters, the people that hit old ladies in the
back of the head with a baseball bat when they're
not looking, they walk down the street, the people.

Speaker 3 (49:44):
That you and you see it, the people that take
out a.

Speaker 5 (49:46):
Gun and shoot you for no reason at all, if
we could get these animals out of our country and
put them in a different country under the supervision of
somebody that made a relatively small fee to maintain these people,
because you know what these are, criminals.

Speaker 3 (50:03):
You call them hardened criminals.

Speaker 5 (50:06):
They've been in jail forty times, there's one forty two times,
and every time the person gets out it's a he
Every time he gets out, he commits another crime within
twenty four hours, and it's a heinus crime. It's a
rough crime. We don't want these people in our country either.
We don't want them in our country. If we had
the option, if we had the option to get them

(50:27):
out and let them be based in some other country
at a fraction of the cost, and frankly, they could
keep them because these people are never going to be
any good. That person that has been arrested forty two
times or twenty two times or seventeen times and is
all in for manslaughter and everything else, it only gets
out because of a very weak judicial system that only

(50:48):
goes after people like Trump. They don't go after the criminals.
They don't go after people like this, and they laugh
at our law. If that took place, you would have
a lot less crime. Automatically, you're exploring with the bay
on Tnamo Bay is a sort of space there to accommodate.
There's a lot of space to accommodate a lot of people,

(51:09):
you know, So we're going to use it. Bit we
have it, it's already up. It's we have it for nothing.
But we can do less expensive and even more secure.
We've had other countries come to us saying we would
love to do that. We would love to take your
criminals and we'll maintain that you know, will be their jail.

(51:31):
And I'm only talking for the most severe cases, like
I watched that guy on tape pushing the man into
the subway last week. That man that did that is
a real bad guy. Many many arrests, and do you
think you're going to convince him someday to be good
and a wonderful, wonderful citizen for our country is never

(51:54):
going to happen. I want to get those people out.
I'd love to get them out, along with the illegal migrants.
The migrants are rough, but we have some bad ones too.
I'd like to get them out. It would be all
subject to the laws of our land, and we're looking
at that to see what we can do.

Speaker 11 (52:07):
What's the presidents have offered to take American citizens to
what other countries have offered to take.

Speaker 5 (52:12):
These America numerous many and Marco brought it up to
that Lady did.

Speaker 3 (52:18):
Because a lot of people are thinking it.

Speaker 5 (52:20):
When I watch some of the crimes being committed in
New York City, in Chicago, look at Chicago. The volume
of crime that have and the viciousness of the crime
is these people are horrible people. And if somebody thinks
they're going to be wonderful citizens someday, they're wrong.

Speaker 3 (52:37):
It's not going to happen. It's not going to happen.

Speaker 5 (52:40):
They're bad. These are hard, tough criminals. In many cases,
they're crazy. They're absolutely crazy, but they're very dangerous. If
I could get them out of the country and be
in some other country where they'd land to have them,
because they make a small fee compared to what we
pay to a private prison or to you know, put
them in one of our prisons, it costs even more money,

(53:00):
I think it would be great. I'd love to get
him the hell out of our country, thank you very much.
I don't want to say, but there's a certain quarterback
that seems to be a pretty good winner.

Speaker 13 (53:13):
And just last one, because you mentioned him many times,
what do you think about Joe Biden signing up with
the talent agents.

Speaker 3 (53:20):
You gotta be kidding. He signed on with the talent agens.

Speaker 12 (53:24):
He knows he's got some entertainment agents.

Speaker 5 (53:26):
Now I think he's got bigger problems, and then I
really do. I think he's got much bigger problems and that.

Speaker 3 (53:31):
But I wish him well. We inherited a mess.

Speaker 5 (53:35):
This place is a mess, but it's quickly being solved.

Speaker 3 (53:39):
The problem. We're gonna make America great again.

Speaker 5 (53:41):
Thank you very much, Thanks guys.

Speaker 1 (53:51):
And there you have it.

Speaker 2 (53:52):
Donald Trump of the Oval Office doing a variety of
work here today. He's in there for an extended period
of time taking questions from the media. Something we didn't see.
They were asked about Joe Biden. We didn't see that.
During Joe Biden's tenure. Of course, in the Oval Office,
he signed a number of different executive orders and memos,
taking the United States out of the United Nations Human

(54:13):
Rights Counsel, taking the United States out of UNESCO, examining
the United States funding of the United Nations. Of course,
we put the majority of the bill there, and a
national security memo. This might have been the biggest part
of the day. On Iran directing all departments and agency's
to target the new program and the support for terror
that Iran has. And he said, simply put, Iran cannot

(54:37):
have a nuclear weapon, cannot have a nuclear weapons.

Speaker 1 (54:40):
So there it is.

Speaker 2 (54:41):
Tuesday wraps up with a flurry. Now he's gonna be
meeting with Benjamin Nett Yahoo here in.

Speaker 1 (54:46):
Just a few moments. Straight ahead special report here. I'm
real America's voice