April 21, 2025 • 48 mins
SEGMENT 1:COURTS BLURRING LINES OVER SEPARATION OF POWERS
SEGMENT 2: FORENSIC ACCOUNTANT RESPONSIBLE TO AG LETITIA JAMES
SEGMENT 3: NH STATE REP. FIRED AFTER DEFENDING GIRLS ONLY SPACES
SEGMENT 4: MAKE YOURSELF HEALTHY AGAIN!
SEGMENT 5: PRESIDENT TRUMP HOSTS FANTASTIC EASTER CELEBRATION AT WHITE HOUSE
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Well, good evening everyone, Welcome to Stinchfield. You know, it's
really starting to bother me that some of President Trump's
most staunchest enemies come from inside his own administration. We
dealt with this the last time around. Apparently there are
still some holdovers. I don't know if you saw this
op ad piece written by a top aide to Pete
(00:42):
Haigesath from inside the Pentagon, somebody who left his post
this week saying that the Pentagon isn't an absolute tailspin. Well,
this dude by the name of John Ulliot worked for
the Trump administration the last time around as a public
affairs specialist in the first administration.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
He's there for Pete.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
Claims that the Secretary of Defense is his great friend,
as he goes to slam him over and over again,
causing all kinds of headaches for President Trump.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
Now, either you're a grandstander or you.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Are jealous of Pete haig Seth for the position that
he's in. Either way, the president doesn't need these types
of people spouting off over and over and over again.
All of his stems from the old story about the
signal chat, this time allegedly a new signal chat related
to the same strikes in Yemen has now popped up
(01:35):
saying that Pete Haig Sath's wife and brother in law,
and the media never mentions that the brother in law
also works inside the Defense Department was on.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
One of these signal chats. None of that matters, It's
an old story.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
What does matter is that those inside, if you have concerns,
take them up with the administration privately, not in politico.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Here's Caroline Levitt.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
Heg Seth was nominated for this position because he is
standing up for the war fighter, the men and women
in uniform who are putting their lives on the line
to protect our country and our homeland.
Speaker 2 (02:09):
And unfortunately, there have.
Speaker 3 (02:11):
Been people at that building who don't like the change
the Secretary is trying to bring. So they are leaking
and they are lying to the mainstream media.
Speaker 2 (02:18):
We've seen this game played before.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
The Secretary is doing a tremendous job and the President
stands strongly behind him.
Speaker 1 (02:26):
Quite frankly, Secretary Headseth doesn't need the headaches. President Trump
doesn't need the headaches. And so I would imagine this
John Ulliott is probably jealous and still connected to the
deep state, probably both.
Speaker 2 (02:38):
It's disgusting.
Speaker 1 (02:39):
He goes to Politico for all of this, when you
could take it up with the administration directly. If you
think there's problems, let them solve them from the inside,
not play in and out in the mainstream media that's
doing great damage to President Trump and his quest to
make America great again. Here's Pete Haigs Seth responding to
it all.
Speaker 4 (02:56):
Oh, what a big surprise that a bunch of a
few leakers get fired and suddenly a bunch of hit
pieces come out from the same media that pedaled the
Russia hopes won't get back their Pulitzers.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
They got poltus for.
Speaker 5 (03:08):
A bunch of lies, Pulitzers for a bunch of lies,
and on hoax's time and time and time again. And
as they peddle those lives, no one ever calls them
on it.
Speaker 1 (03:21):
All you need to know is this top aid to
Pete Haig thatth who wrote this opinion piece in Politico
is where he went to write it Politico. Really, I
want to bring in now in Washington, d C. Outside
the White House, Real America's voice, chief White House correspondent.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
My good friend Brian Glenni is with us. Brian, welcome,
back to the program.
Speaker 6 (03:39):
Thanks thanks Bren, Brian, great to be here.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
You know, the president doesn't need this. Pete Haggseth doesn't
need this. I'm sure the media is falling over this.
But this is an old story, is it not.
Speaker 6 (03:51):
Brian, Yeah, this is just Signal Gate two point zero.
It's just rinse and repeat. You've got that function on
your washing machine as well. I think his comments at
this Easter egg roll and he addressed the media about
this says it all. This is a story that and
like you said, there were a few details that were
(04:13):
left out in this.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Story and also anonymous sources.
Speaker 6 (04:17):
I think when you have a story based upon anonymous
sources and there's other variants that are so mysterious about
what makes up this story and what's it's intended to do.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
At the end of the.
Speaker 6 (04:29):
Day, why have this come out? This does not do
does it do this country any favor by having this happen.
They are simply trying to block the progress that President
Trump and his whole entire team is doing.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
Right now, Brian, I've got my thoughts about what they
think of Pete haig Seth, and they meaning deep staters
in trenched bureaucrats whatever you want to call them inside
the Pentagon. Why do you think they're so afraid of
Pete hagg Seth right now?
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Well, because he's not interested.
Speaker 6 (05:03):
And this is just my personal opinion of just leading
us into these endless wars that we've been getting ourselves
into for so long. I think some of these intel
people have misled this the previous administration in times and
this is a tradition of what they do here in DC.
As you know, it's the military industrial complex. They're in
(05:25):
the business of war. They're in the business of manipulating war.
And I think that head Seth is a man of
the troops. He's a man's man in all of this
that people love him. He's got a lot of leadership skills.
He's kind of a no bs kind of guy. He
bucks the traditional system of what they're used to and
this person in this position, so I think at the
(05:45):
end of the day, he's a disruptor, but in a
good way. He's a disruptor, and they simply don't want
him to succede. All right, Brent, let me ask you.
Speaker 1 (05:53):
I've got a lot of friends that work in the
military outside of the Pentagon.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
A few inside the Pentagon.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
I was not under the assumption that the Pentagon, the
Department Defence, is in any kind of a tail spin.
In fact, I thought morale was being restored to the troops,
that we were taking the fight to our enemies better
than we have in the last four years under Joe Biden.
And yet this piece you read in political looks like
it's utter chaos there. Do you have any indications that
(06:22):
the Pentagon is not in decent shape right now as
he makes it out to be in this political piece.
Speaker 6 (06:29):
No, there's no other indication that they are in a
tail spin. Where's the people coming out saying this? Where
are they are? They're not holding press conferences? Are they
not identifying themselves as being very particular on what their
concerns are? So I think it's a nothing burger. But
that's what we've been served up by the leftist media
(06:51):
for far too long, and I think they're very desperate
kind of you know, kind of rehashing an old story
that quite honestly had about a but a seven to
eight day life cycle the last time, and it was
shut down. So this time I think it gets shut
down by the end of the tonight.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
Well, as you know, Buddy, I respect your opinion, your insight.
You have such great contacts in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
At so many levels.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
So I want to tell everybody at home, if Brian
tells you to, you can take it to the bank.
And again, this is the mainstream media that is doing
everything they can, as you said, Brian, to derail President
Trump and Pete Hagseth because they're afraid of what they're
doing in this country and that is making it great again.
Brian Glenn always, I hope you had a great easter.
Thanks for coming on today.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
Thank you, Grant, appreciate it. Thanks for having me, absolutely, buddy,
always a pleasure.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
All right, folks, I want to turn out of the
Supreme Court ruling over the weekend. The Supreme Court again
total disappointment. Basically, he puts a stay on President Trump's
plans to deport many of these MS thirteen gang members
under the Alien Enemies Act.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Saying oh no, we got a pause? Is this play
is out now?
Speaker 1 (08:00):
I just want you to hear the dissenting opinion from.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
Justice Alito in all of this, and when you read.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
It, this seems to be more the truth than what
the Supreme Court did. By putting a stay on all
of this. Take a look it reads.
Speaker 2 (08:17):
In the dissenting opinion by Alito.
Speaker 1 (08:19):
Literally in the middle of the night, the Court issued
unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts
a chance to rule, without hearing from the opposing party,
within eight hours of receiving the application, with dubious factual
support for its order, and without providing any explanation for
its order.
Speaker 2 (08:40):
Now that is the dissenting opinion.
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Of course, the Supreme Court are very short ruling said hey,
you gotta stop deporting people under this.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
So what can be done now?
Speaker 1 (08:53):
I want to bring in former Trump attorney Claremont Institute
senior fellow and a great constitutional expert.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
Are good friend John Eastman this year John, welcome to
the program, Grant.
Speaker 7 (09:04):
Thanks for having me back on What a way to
spend Easter weekend watching this roller coaster ride.
Speaker 2 (09:08):
I tell you, well, it's amazing. John.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
You know I will say I had thought and now
forgive me if it was you that tipped me off
to this idea, and because there's so much information but
that the President may not have needed to use the
Alien Enemies Act, and by using it, he opened himself
up to legal interpretation. Others says, no, it's not open
(09:33):
to legal interpretation. But could he not have just said, Hey,
I'm the president of the United States. I can deport
anybody I want if they're here with no papers.
Speaker 7 (09:41):
Well, the problem is there's a whole mechanism under the
immigration laws that have been passed by Congress that require
immigration judges and Board of Immigration Appeals.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
And all that.
Speaker 7 (09:52):
The one thing the Alien and Enemies Act does two
things is it expedites that process, and it also provides
for almost no judicial review, which it recognizes the president's
sole authority under the Constitution in times of war or
when as he claims that we are you know, there's
(10:13):
this incursion, this systematic incursion by foreign enemies of the
United States into the United States, and so he exercised,
he asserted the Alien Enemies Act in order to expedite
him ability to act as commander in chief and defend
the country.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
All right, So, John, how do we get to a point?
Speaker 1 (10:32):
And I trust you would you say, and others have
reiterated what you say that this is not open to
judicial review. Yet we've got lower federal courts reviewing it judicially.
And then the Supreme Court weighs in to try to
review it judicially.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
How do we get to this point, Well, what.
Speaker 7 (10:50):
Was most bizarre about what happened over the weekend is,
in fact, the lower courts had not ruled that. You know,
the claim by the ACLU that the district court denied
their temporary restraining order is a bit specious. They filed
the notice of appeal from that so called denial forty
(11:11):
two minutes after they filed for the temporary restraining order
on Good Friday, and the district court judge and I'm
looking at it, give me a little bit of time.
And they went ahead and filed it anyway, and then
it gets up to the Fifth Circuit. The appeal deprived
the district court of jurisdiction to continue looking at it,
and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that we
(11:32):
don't have jurisdiction because there's no temporary restraining order denial here,
and so it was a farce. And you know, then
you get to the Supreme Court and they asked for
emergency relief, and as Justice Alito points out in his descent,
it's unprecedented. Why is it unprecedented? Well, the Department of
Justice pointed out later in a filing later on Saturday
(11:53):
that the people that were the named parties in the
case were already had habeas corpus petitions pending in the
district court. They weren't being removed at all, and so
what they are seeking is relief on behalf of some
unnamed members of a class that had not even been certified.
That's what's unprecedented about it.
Speaker 1 (12:14):
You know, not to get too deep in the legal
leeds here, but when you talk about a class a
class action lawsuit, President Trump has dumned NEVIS thirteen a
foreign terrorist organization. Are the courts dubbing terrorists now a
class of people?
Speaker 7 (12:29):
Well, this is what the Department of Justice filing on
Saturday night points out. We don't even know who they're
talking about because there's been no class. It's anybody he
wants to deport on the alien enemy deck. Well, the
Supreme Court a couple of weeks ago said you've got
to bring habeas petitions in the district where they're currently incarcerated.
That means you cannot have a nationwide class because every
(12:52):
individual seeking habeas corpus relief is going to have different
factual circumstances, that's not susceptible. The class action review and
Justice Alito and the Department of Justice all point that out.
And how unprecedented the Supreme Court putting a stop to
this given those circumstances.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
So then I've got to ask you, John, with all
your experience with the Supreme Court, what is going on here?
Amy comy parent seems to be a total disappointment.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
What's happening? You know?
Speaker 7 (13:20):
I think I think the Court is upset that the
president has powers that he can exercise without the Court
graving him permission, and they're trying to assert their authority.
The bigger issue going on here is the question of
judicial supremacy versus merely judicial review, and particularly on separation
(13:41):
of powers, core separation of powers issues, where the Constitution's
Article two quite clearly vests the final say not in
a court, not in any court, not even in the
Supreme Court, but in the elected president of the United States.
Speaker 2 (13:55):
And we are having a monumental.
Speaker 7 (13:59):
Pissing content between the branches of government here about who
has authority to exercise the president's power.
Speaker 1 (14:06):
What you're talking about here is an ego contest at
the highest levels of who has more power than the
other person.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
Why can't we just go back to the Constitution and
see you as the power.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
I believe you when you say the president has the power.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
Many other legal experts say it.
Speaker 1 (14:25):
So we now have a Supreme Court that has an
ego so big they want the power?
Speaker 2 (14:29):
Is that literally what we're talking about.
Speaker 7 (14:33):
In a prior era, and the Supreme Court would deal
with questions of a commander in chief authority foreign affairs
authority has vested exclusively in the president and presenting non
justiciable political questions to the courts because they don't act
with the information that is available to the president. And
the Constitution deliberately assigns the ultimate and authority over such
(14:57):
questions to the elected president of the United States. That's
how the courts, in my view, should be designing these things.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
There.
Speaker 7 (15:04):
These are getting right into the middle of pre presidential
powers and we have really no competency to address all
of the information, the intelligence that he has before him
that's allowing him to make these decisions.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
All right, Thomas and Alito seem to be the most conservative.
Do you think President Trump made a mistake with Amy
Cony Barrett and quite possibly Kavanaugh in appointing them with
the Supreme Court.
Speaker 7 (15:32):
Well, I don't know the answer to that. It's you know,
one never knows how people are going to act when
they get on the court. And I because the Court
did not write an opinion, it just issued this order,
it's hard to see what their reasoning is. And so
I'm gonna I'm going to hold back just a touch
and see if we can see some reasoning come out
(15:53):
of this to explain what it is they did over
the weekend.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
All right, well, well, as we get more information that
comes back, we'll get you back on here to keep
explaining this stuff. It gets complicated, But in the end,
I really believe this has now come down the egos
and who wants the power as everything comes down to
in Washington, DC, which is what people are so fed
up with. Johnny Eastman has always it's great having you
on the program.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
Thank you, sir, Thank you, Grant. Take care absolutely you
two folks. I just want to show you one picture.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
This is President Trump holding up a picture you know
ten for the guys behind the glass you can see this.
This is President Trump holding up a picture of the
hands of the so called marilynd Man Remember this is
the now domestic abuser. This is the MS thirteen gang members.
Those are knuckles with an MS thirteen tattoo on the knuckles.
(16:42):
And this Van Holland who went down to visit him,
which everybody's making such a crazy deal over. I guess
didn't ask the most important question of this MS thirteen
gang member, Hey are you one roll it?
Speaker 8 (16:57):
But since you were the one person to have met
with him, and since this is a thing you say
on social media, it's what we hear from Donald Trump
and Republicans every day, all day long, you didn't ask him.
Speaker 9 (17:10):
I didn't ask him that because I know what his
answer is.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
You don't know what his answer is. You don't want
to know the answer.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
That's why you didn't ask him. So the Democrats can
keep defending MS thirteen gang members here and see how
this works out for you. The American people are not
on your side. I don't want to turn down a
foreign policy. Let's talk about Ukraine and Israel first. We'll
start with Ukraine. Peace talks are not going well. President
Trump and Marc or Rubio has made this clear. Now
(17:41):
if it doesn't look like they're going to be able
to get a deal. The America that I know and
love under President Trump has got to cut bait listen
to this.
Speaker 10 (17:52):
So we came here yesterday to sort of begin to
talk about more specific outlines of what it might take
to and to war to try to figure out very soon.
And I'm talking about a matter of days, not a
matter of weeks, whether or not this is a war
that can be ended. If it can, We're prepared to
do whatever we can to facilitate that and make sure
that it happens that it ends in a durable and
(18:13):
just the way. If it's not possible, if we're so
far apart that this is not going to happen, then
I think the President's probably at a point where he's
going to say, well, We're.
Speaker 2 (18:21):
Done, folks.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
That was a spot that I've been at for a
very very long time. If it cannot be worked out,
the American taxpayer should not be put on the dole
to pay for this.
Speaker 2 (18:33):
War in Ukraine.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
All right now, I want to turn it to Israel.
People that I trust are now telling me that there
is a very good chance that Israel is going to
go into Gaza in a very big way to end
this Hamas nonsense.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
Once and for all.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
But before that can happen, they've got to take care
of some other enemies like the Hohotis and quite possibly Iran.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
What does all of this mean?
Speaker 1 (18:57):
I want to bring in the man who tipped me
off to this with his idea of what could possibly happen.
Former Green Beret and host of Speak the Truth podcast,
our friend Matt Tardio is with us.
Speaker 2 (19:07):
Matt, welcome back to the show.
Speaker 9 (19:09):
Hey Grant, thanks for having me back.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
All right, it's always a pleasure.
Speaker 1 (19:13):
I found it fascinating your assessment of the potential for
a massive conflict, conflict now with many facets. Can you
explain to me what you see here that could potentially
happen over the next few days?
Speaker 11 (19:28):
Right, So, like you just saw what Marco Rubio is saying,
we've only got a matter of.
Speaker 9 (19:33):
Days to figure this out. And I believe you actually said that.
Speaker 11 (19:35):
What last Thursday or Friday is when Marco Rubio said that,
And so that matter of days matters when we start
talking about the Middle East as well, because prior to
October seventh, about fifty percent of the petroleum that's rolling
through the Seuic Canal all.
Speaker 9 (19:47):
Belonged to Russian.
Speaker 11 (19:49):
All of it belonged to Russia, and a major portion
of their exports and a lot of the money that
they're making in order to fund this war over inside
of Ukraine was coming from the oil exports that they
were sending out in through the seue Is Canal and
up over into Asia. Because Joe Biden, the one thing
he actually got right, ended up slapping sanctions on right, Well,
they had to offload that oil somewhere. So when the
Hoothi's end up closing out the Suez Canal, well, guess what,
(20:11):
all of a sudden, Russia has got an advantage on
the global economy and they're able to send all of
that oil up over to Asia at a much cheaper price.
If so facto they can sell it off and they
can actually fund their war effort. But it goes deeper
than that, because now we've got to talk about a
run today. Did you see what came out today, Grant?
Did you happen to see it? Because a run Russia
ended up signing a new agreement. So they ended up
(20:32):
signing a new agreement today that said, weller number one,
we're going to end up developing a brand new banking
system that's going to allow us to send money back
and forth to each other without having to deal with
the international banks. Therefore, the sanctions aren't going to matter.
But a run all right, has been funding the hooth
He's down inside Yemen. They're going to go, and you
know in the US has been bombing the crap out
of them. I think over today we I mean the
(20:54):
Hoothy media has been reporting I think it was like
twenty five or twenty seven sorties that, like the US
Navy has just been flying and bombing crap out of
them today. Right, But with all of that being said,
once that Red Sea is back open, that means the
Suez Canal.
Speaker 9 (21:05):
Is back open for international traffic.
Speaker 11 (21:07):
Eighty percent of the traffic through the Red Sea ended
up getting shut down when the HOOTI started, you know,
doing what they do, sinking five merchant vessels, killing numerous
merch sailors, on and on and on. So as soon
as that's back open, Russia's oil, cheap oil is done,
they're back competing.
Speaker 9 (21:21):
With everybody else.
Speaker 11 (21:22):
EU lost an estimate one hundred and sixty four billion
dollars because of this garbage last year. So before Israel
goes into Gaza. They've got to worry about Iran, who
very well has nuclear weapons, very very well. The IAEA
International Agency Atomic Energy ends up coming out and saying,
you know what, we think Iran has sixty percent and
rich uranium, about six hundred pounds worth of it. They
(21:43):
ended up determining a couple months ago that Iran has
two uranium enrichment sides just south of Teyran, just south
of Teyran, that they did not announce, and that they
did not disclose. The IAA in in.
Speaker 9 (21:55):
In regulation with the mpt RelA Feration Treaty.
Speaker 1 (22:00):
So they've got to do something about that. If that's
the case, you would also say correct that if Israel
goes into Gaza in a big way, you think there
could be a drone attack of thousands of drones going
into Israel and to thwart that, you've got to take
care of Iran first.
Speaker 2 (22:15):
Do I have it right?
Speaker 11 (22:17):
Not just not just drones. You know, if it was
just drones, we were worried about Grant. We've moved so
much firepower. The United States government has moved so much
firepower and the release it's not even funny. But now
we're talking about ballistic and cruise missiles that very well
could be nuclear capable now heading up over into Israel.
In addition to that, we got to worry about all
of the US service members that are also stage over
inside of a rock right and across the Middle Ease.
(22:38):
We saw US service members withdrawing from inside of Syria
just last week. Now all of that matters for a reason,
because we moved an entire patriot battery, something that we're
going to rely upon in order to shoot down these
ballistic missiles if Iran ends up shooting them. We moved
an entire patriot battery out of pay Com or like
the Pacific Area of Command up over into Sentcom the
Central Area of Command. General Carilla is on his way
(22:58):
over to Israel, and we just had Bengivir laying in
the United States today.
Speaker 1 (23:03):
All right, so all of this looks like a massive
escalation real quick. If you can for me in thirty seconds,
over the next few days, what do you think happens?
Speaker 2 (23:09):
Do you think we see strikes on Iran?
Speaker 11 (23:12):
I think over the next couple of days. But it's
going to end up happening. Is Donald Trump, along with
his entire SECURITYFF, is going to end up sitting around
making some very difficult decisions. I don't think you can
trust Iran as far as that you can throw them.
And when you start weighing it out with just open
source information my ticket and I start processing it all
I can assess about a fifty percent probability iron has
a nuclear weapon. Israel's abount to roll on Rafa, They're
about to roll on Gays the city. They're about to
(23:34):
start crushing Hamas. And you have to say, does Iran
have a fifty percent or better probability of having a
nuclear weapon?
Speaker 9 (23:40):
Is that something you want to risk. If that's the.
Speaker 11 (23:42):
Case and you do want to risk it, well there
it is. If not, then we got to bond the
crap out of them.
Speaker 2 (23:47):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
It's fascinating stuff and it's amazing the assessments you're able
to come up with looking at this stuff from your
experiences of Green Beret, and of course it's your knowledge
of looking at some of this information in your context
where they are. Matt Tardio, as always, thank you for
coming on. I urge people to check out your podcast
as well.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
Thank you, buddy.
Speaker 9 (24:05):
Thanks Grey appreciate having me.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
Absolutely look folks and a lot of people aren't talking
about this, Like the whole Israel thing is outside the
news realm. Right now, We're not going to forget about it,
all right, think about it. Every dollar you spend either
supports your values or works against them.
Speaker 2 (24:20):
Where you spend it matters.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
I'm talking about Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
Lets you take a stand without sacrificing quality. Get exceptional
nationwide coverage with access to all three major US networks.
Add two numbers on one phone, something the big carriers
can't match. Enjoy flexible unlimited data plans with high speed.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
Data hotspots and more.
Speaker 1 (24:42):
Switching is easy, keep your number phone or upgrade. Our
one hundred percent US based team activates you in minutes.
Joined today at patriotmobile dot com.
Speaker 2 (24:53):
All right, up, Next, I will.
Speaker 1 (24:55):
Have the conversation with the forensic accountant who uncovered Letitia James,
this trail of alleged mortgage fraud. This is the guy
behind now this criminal referral.
Speaker 2 (25:07):
Did not want to miss his interview. That's next. Welcome
back everyone, Remember Letitia James.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
This is the attorney general in New York who went
after President Trump with a vengeance for a small record
keeping case that she turned into, you know, felony extraordin air.
She now has some big problems on her hands because
she may be guilty of all kinds of mortgage fraud.
One of the allegations is she put a residence in
Virginia as her primary residence. We know what that means
(25:43):
when you try to claim a homestead and it must
be your primary residence. But she's in New York as
the Attorney General. How could it be? Well, the Daily
Caller showed up at that house in Virginia, did they
find her?
Speaker 9 (25:56):
Are you related to Letitia James?
Speaker 2 (25:58):
Do you know her?
Speaker 12 (26:00):
Go with the house?
Speaker 2 (26:01):
Do you know?
Speaker 9 (26:02):
Okay, thank you man, Thank you man, Thank you, ma'am.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
You have a good one.
Speaker 1 (26:08):
Well, the answer is no, she wasn't there. So how
did this all come about? It's a fascinating story. The
man who uncovered it describes himself as a former Wall
Street criminal turned fraud investigator. For those of you like
me from the northeast Tri State area, he may remember
Crazy Eddies all right, he was the CFO. He now
(26:29):
runs a website called White Collar Fraud. He's the one
that found all of these details about Alicia James's alleged
mortgage fraud and maybe Sam Antar, is it safe to
say your investigation is insane.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
Or is that joke not good? Sam?
Speaker 13 (26:47):
Thank you for having me on the investigation is insane?
Speaker 1 (26:51):
Well, let me ask you, how did you get started
on this and why don't you lay out briefly exactly
what you uncovered here?
Speaker 14 (26:59):
First of all, have the Troy will get the camera. Okay,
what happened was I've been after crazyies. I started working
as a forensic accountant, teaching law enforcement agencies of major corporations,
doing whistleblower work for law firms. I actually won a
whistleblow reward over seven figures one time. I've been doing
(27:21):
and I've been teaching, so this is something I've been
doing for the last thirty years. I know every trick
in the book, every trick that they that's not in
the book, and every trick that they think.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
They're going to do.
Speaker 13 (27:31):
Because I was on both sides of the law, Sam.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
It sounds to me like she wasn't even smart about
her tricks, and she's an attorney general.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
It was right there for you to see, was it not? Well?
Speaker 14 (27:43):
She probably figured that Biden was going to win reelection,
and that nobody.
Speaker 13 (27:47):
Would catch her.
Speaker 14 (27:48):
You see what happened was I was doing a lot
of work on New York City politicians and New York
City's financing. I stumbled upon her, and that's how I
got to her. I didn't target her or anything like that.
I'm not a member of the Trump administration. I'm not
a Republican, I hate to say, itty, I'm a Democrat.
And I did what I had to do, all.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
Right, So what exactly did you find? There's the issues
in New Jersey, there's issues with properties in Brooklyn. There's
this issue of her father being listed as her husband.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Play it out for me what you found.
Speaker 14 (28:25):
Okay, let me break it out for you. First of all,
you have two Virginia properties. The first Virginia property she
purchased two weeks before the Trump trial in August of
two thousand and twenty three. On that property, there was
a mortgage filed, but part of the mortgage that was
(28:47):
filed was a Swan declaration stating her intent to occupy
that house as her primary residence with the co owner,
and the mortgage was structured that both owners, her and
her niece to co ownA had to had to occupy
the house. Now, do you believe that she wasn't going
(29:08):
Do you believe that she really intended to move to
Virginia because before the Trump trial?
Speaker 2 (29:13):
No way, No, She's going to also, haven't. This is
the document Sam, you found.
Speaker 1 (29:21):
I want to put it up on the screen and
I'll read it real quickly for you because it's very,
very simple.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
This was through a power of attorney.
Speaker 1 (29:27):
She highlighted I hereby declare that I intend to occupy
this property as my principal residence.
Speaker 13 (29:34):
You put that on and with by somebody, by a
chief steputy in her office.
Speaker 2 (29:40):
Go ahead. What kind of crime is that now? In
the big scheme of.
Speaker 14 (29:44):
Things, mail, wire freud, mortgage fraud. I'm not a lawyer,
but I can think of at least three from my background.
But the pointing is she had to move into that
house within sixty days.
Speaker 2 (29:56):
She never did.
Speaker 14 (29:58):
And it seems like from some of the press I've
been reading that I cannot verify because I only verify
my own work, is that that that other party didn't
move in until way past the sixty day mark.
Speaker 1 (30:11):
All right, what is the next situation with her labeling
her father as her husband?
Speaker 14 (30:18):
That was Joe Gilbert found that Gateweight pundit. He found
that he found that nineteen eighty three or eighty four,
I'm not sure exactly the year that the deed was
in her father and her name as father and daughter,
but the mortgage was a husband.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
And wife, which is you know, a lot of people
would say, Okay, she's doing this. It has to be
for two reasons, and the two cases we're talking about.
One is to get a favorable tax benefit. If you
say it's your own house and you have homestead, you
also have some legal protections with the home instead and
(30:57):
getting a favorable what's that No hamsteads were filed in Virginia? Okay,
and then and so why would she claim it's your
principal residence.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
Is that for a favorable mortgage rate?
Speaker 14 (31:08):
Then apople mortgage rate? Yes, absolutely, it's also on the
brook and property. Over the last twenty years, she's been
representing the numbers one, two, and three, but the.
Speaker 13 (31:18):
CFO says five.
Speaker 14 (31:19):
In fact, right before I get out of the air,
that's why I'm a little bit crazy today. Right before
I got in the year, I posted a new blog
showing that the electrical service to the building shows five units.
So she's now in our life, she's been telling the
press war units. It's always been that way. No, the
certificate of Activeasey says five units.
Speaker 2 (31:39):
You know.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
So she's claiming it's a residence for one person when
it's a multiple residents. That means it's an income producers
residence for four people.
Speaker 14 (31:49):
But her mortgage is say sometimes one person, two residents is,
three residents is or four? But number five, because five
brings you into the commercial loan area, we have to
pay a higher rate. Now, not only does it's a
CFO says five, and you can't, you know, New York,
(32:10):
if you don't follow the CFO, the building's apartment comes
down on every evandlord that tries to screw around with
that is that is the gold stand.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
Now.
Speaker 14 (32:19):
The second thing I found just now that well today
was the electrical service to the building shows five units.
Speaker 13 (32:27):
So what is she gonna say?
Speaker 15 (32:28):
Now?
Speaker 1 (32:30):
Well, then, the last question I have for you, have
you found any evidence that someone in a position of power,
political power, was protecting her, was pushing this stuff through,
making sure nobody asked any.
Speaker 2 (32:41):
Questions which put it this way?
Speaker 14 (32:43):
From looking over forty years of documents and instances of
about maybe twenty thirty. Every single mortgage, It's put it
that way, every single mortgage has false information.
Speaker 13 (32:58):
It's not an accident. She didn't get she didn't do
this by yourself. There had to be other people involved.
I don't know if it's the appraisers, the title company,
the loan offs is. You can't do this by yourself
and get.
Speaker 15 (33:09):
Away with it.
Speaker 1 (33:11):
Last question for you, there's a criminal inquiry now a
referral to look into this.
Speaker 2 (33:16):
Were you actually responsible over that? Did you hand this
stuff over to the Justice Department.
Speaker 13 (33:21):
Most of the work that was in the referral came
from me, not all of it. Some of it came
from Joe Gilbert, and some of it came from other sources.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
Well, it's fascinating stuff. Sam Antar.
Speaker 1 (33:31):
As a Democrat, I'm not open thanking democrats out there,
but on this one, I thank you because she went
after President Trump with a vengeance. So you know, what
comes around goes around in the scheme of things, and
I appreciate your work on this.
Speaker 13 (33:44):
I agree with you.
Speaker 14 (33:45):
We have to have a rule of law in America,
irrespective of what are you from the left or from
the right.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
Now that I've had you on once. I'm gonna work
on you over the next year or so, and I'm
gonna get you a flip. I'm going to have you
as a Republican by the by the end of here,
Sam an are thank you so much for coming on today.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
We appreciate it, okay, folks.
Speaker 1 (34:03):
In New Hampshire, a state representative, Republican of course, says
she was fired from her day job overcomments she made
defending girls' only spaces.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
We'll talk about this next well, folks.
Speaker 1 (34:28):
Apparently speaking out for what's right, speaking out for what
you believe in can have great consequences in this country, Savagy.
Speaker 2 (34:35):
The left is going off the deep end.
Speaker 1 (34:37):
With their censorship, with their cancel culture. I'm here to
say enough is enough. In New Hampshire, a Republican state
representative felt the need to speak out against biological boys
occupying girls' bathrooms in the middle school, of all places,
and she says she got fired for that from her
(34:58):
longtime job.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
This is what she said at the school board.
Speaker 12 (35:02):
Little girls shouldn't have to be afraid to use the
bathroom and hold it all day.
Speaker 2 (35:07):
And I think we can all.
Speaker 9 (35:08):
Agree that that should not be happening.
Speaker 2 (35:10):
It's painful for them.
Speaker 13 (35:13):
That shouldn't happen.
Speaker 12 (35:16):
This school board needs to create a clear and fair
policy that protects every student stigmity, and we are to
have compassion for every student.
Speaker 1 (35:27):
Well, she got ac hued of being mean to the
student biological boy wanted to use the girls room. One
of her fellow representatives, a Democrat, actually tweeted this after
she got fired the next morning. Quote, it's probably just
a coincidence if it happened the morning after the school
board meeting. But that as it may, it doesn't look
good for a forty something adult to be picking on
(35:49):
a fourteen year old kid during a school board meeting,
regardless of gender, regardless of gender identity.
Speaker 2 (35:55):
I don't think she was picking on anybody.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
I think she was standing up for little girls who
don't want to be going to the bathroom with boys
in the bathroom.
Speaker 2 (36:04):
It is that simple. I want to bring in with
me now.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
New Hampshire State Representative Republican Lisa Maser is with us.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
Lisa, welcome to.
Speaker 9 (36:12):
The program, Hi Grant, thank you glad to be here.
Speaker 1 (36:16):
All right, So this is troubling to say to Lisa,
especially when I heard you got fired. There's bigger issues
than even that at play here though, Your response to
what happened to you and how are you assessing this
now after a few days have passed.
Speaker 16 (36:31):
Yeah, I'm still actually kind of reeling from it all,
you know, because a lot of people may not know this,
but in New Hampshire, we state reps. We only make
one hundred dollars a year before taxes, and so many
of us have to have full time jobs on the
side to pay the bills. And I had had this
full time job for going into my sixth year and
(36:55):
it was going great. So this Monday I had a
job and there was no inkling of anything negative. Tuesday
I spoke up at the school board meeting because I
had a lot of parents contact me when they found
out a little boy was using well he's not so little,
he's thirteen using their daughter's bathrooms, and they asked me
(37:17):
to speak up for them, and I always have in
my two three years of being a state Rep. I'm
going into my third, I've never been afraid to stand up.
But now I think it's even more important with what
we're seeing around the country, and it's crazy.
Speaker 1 (37:34):
You know, Representative Veser, I don't think what you said
was really out of line at all. Obviously, now we're
coming from the same place on this issue. But let
me play another clip of the people at home to decide.
Speaker 12 (37:46):
This isn't about judgment or discrimination. It's about ensuring safety,
privacy and comfort of all our students. Having this concern
for girls, does it make us transphobic? Then we're not
bullying as people. We're speaking up.
Speaker 1 (38:03):
So the school district say anything or are they're just
going to literally let boys into girls rooms?
Speaker 16 (38:11):
Yes, and we don't currently have a really solid law
to back us up.
Speaker 9 (38:18):
We're working on it, and so we have two.
Speaker 16 (38:21):
Bills going through the House and Senate right now that
will hopefully firm that up a bit. And ironically, this
coming week I sponsored two bills, one that will prohibit
puberty blockers and cross sex hormones and top surgeries in children.
And so coincidentally that's all happening this week too. Those
(38:44):
bills past the House, I'm presenting them in front of
the Senate this week and hopefully they'll be on their
way to the Governor's desk. So you know, New Hampshire
is a real hot a hot spot for this right now.
Speaker 1 (38:58):
Well, it's sure he is, and it is basically virtually
a swing state or Republicans and control in the state.
Speaker 16 (39:03):
House, yes, and the Senate.
Speaker 1 (39:06):
All right, So that's all right. So that's good news,
and so we'll see how this plays out. Lastly, I
want to ask you. I haven't reached out to your employer,
so I'm not going to name them. Could it be
a coincidence? Of course, I don't typically believe in coincidences,
especially when it comes to politics at this level.
Speaker 2 (39:24):
But did you confront them on this? Did they give
you a reason for it or no?
Speaker 15 (39:30):
No?
Speaker 16 (39:30):
I mean I spoke at the school board meeting tuesday night.
I got the call from the owner eight o'clock the
next morning, and we were pretty friendly. I mean, I've
been there for a while and we've always kept politics aside.
I even hid my last name, like in my work,
you know, when emailing people. I really tried to protect
(39:53):
the business and it has never been an issue. There's
never been a negative anything on me. So this was
all just And then when she called me, she was
cold as ice, like something a switch flipped. And it
was the next morning, and so coincidence maybe, but I
highly doubt it.
Speaker 1 (40:12):
I can tell you Something else that happens, and I've
heard stories before, is business owners that just want to
stay out of it get threatened by radical liberals who
start calling and making all kinds of threats against the business,
and they get scared and they do crazy things.
Speaker 2 (40:27):
Not saying that's what happened here, but you never know.
Speaker 1 (40:30):
It's a very sad spot that we live in a
time like this where you even have to consider that
that could.
Speaker 2 (40:34):
Be the possibility.
Speaker 1 (40:35):
Keep up the great work on fighting for Fighting for
Girls in New Hampshire. And Lisa Maser, we appreciate you
coming on the program today. Thank you and good luck
in the next job search. I guess thank you thank
you for having me absolutely. You know, folks, over the
course of what two decades, I've owned businesses, a.
Speaker 2 (40:54):
Number of them.
Speaker 1 (40:55):
I've probably employed over two hundred people at least. I
would never fire somebody if they wanted to go and
argue for pro choice issues, if they wanted to argue
these transgender nonsense, as long as they keep it out
of work, as long as they do their job. Well,
we're in America.
Speaker 2 (41:13):
They have a right to do anything.
Speaker 12 (41:14):
You know.
Speaker 1 (41:14):
Now, I'm basically we're employing truck drivers and auto technicians.
But I'm not going to squash somebody's right to free
speech as long as they're not bringing.
Speaker 2 (41:23):
That into the business.
Speaker 1 (41:25):
And too many businesses are doing that now, and they're
bowing to the radical left.
Speaker 2 (41:29):
That's the real crazy part of all of this.
Speaker 1 (41:31):
All right, I want you to become a part of
making America healthy again.
Speaker 2 (41:36):
It's a great movement. We're going to tell you how next.
Speaker 1 (41:49):
Welcome back everyone. I've told you a thousand times. I'm
a big believer of the Energized Health system. I lost
fifteen pounds in two weeks. All my levels went in
the right direction. Testosterone of cholesterol down, body fat loss,
muscle mass gained, all of it at Energized Health dot com.
Speaker 2 (42:07):
And I'm so grateful to the program.
Speaker 1 (42:08):
You know what another benefit was was how my body
dealt with chronic pain. It started to go away. That
chronic pain will get you depressed too, by the way,
I've been there where it starts to screw with your mind.
Speaker 2 (42:21):
Watch this little video here. I've survived accidents that should
have killed me.
Speaker 17 (42:26):
When I started this, my pain level was between seven
and eight twenty four to seven. I had chronic pain,
was not getting any relieve, and I did quite well.
I would say now it's at three to four. The
other thing is no more blood pressure medicine. I actually
don't take any medication anymore. But the biggest thing for
me is attitude change. But the tools that I've gotten
(42:47):
from here has changed my mindset, has changed how I
go forward. And the people around me are the ones
who comment about So that's what I'm encouraged by it.
Speaker 2 (42:58):
I'm not changing nothing. Here's what I want you to do.
Speaker 1 (43:01):
There are hundreds of testimonials like that on the Energized
Health website energizedealth dot com.
Speaker 2 (43:07):
Go watch some of them and you'll see what the
Energized Health program can do for you.
Speaker 1 (43:11):
I want to bring in now the founder of Energized Health,
my good buddy John Jubilee.
Speaker 2 (43:16):
John, Welcome. I hope you had a great easter.
Speaker 9 (43:19):
Well, great to see you, Grant have a spectacular easter.
Speaker 2 (43:22):
Thank you. Ah, that's good to hear. All right.
Speaker 1 (43:24):
So, chronic pain and energized health. This intercellular hydration helps
with pain. Can you explain to me how.
Speaker 2 (43:34):
Well?
Speaker 7 (43:34):
I sure can?
Speaker 18 (43:35):
And man, how many of you guys out there listening
listening to Grant and I. You know, you've got some
chronic pain, and maybe you're like me, you just thought
that's how your life's going to be. When I was
bone on bone and both of my knees, I just thought,
this is going to be my life. And then doctors
told me grant that my only way to get any
relief from that pain was to have two new knee replacements.
(43:58):
But lo and behold, through the patent pending science of
intracellular hydration, I was able to rebuild that natural cartilage
because as you pull in that intracellular hydration, it activates
your body's natural stem cells that we all already have.
You don't need to go to Mexico and spend twenty
thousand dollars to get stem cells. You have stem cells,
(44:20):
they're just dehydrated. And by activating that grant, it pushes
all the inflammation. It pushes the inflammation out, which is
the root cause of that chronic pain. And you don't
have to live with that pain, folks, you really don't.
I was told I was going to have to.
Speaker 2 (44:37):
It was a lie.
Speaker 18 (44:38):
And you can have you can have freedom from pain,
you can have it.
Speaker 2 (44:45):
All RD.
Speaker 1 (44:45):
So I look at it like this, because there's so
many benefits from getting hydrated at an intracellular level in
the science behind how you actually do that.
Speaker 2 (44:53):
But you lose that as you mentioned, the pain starts
to go away.
Speaker 1 (45:00):
You gain muscle mass as well, and then I'm thinking
of the mental aspect of all of this has to
be huge.
Speaker 2 (45:07):
Well, it is great.
Speaker 18 (45:09):
Just think about you know, if you were walking around
with the big rock in your shoe, you're going to
be kind of grumpy. You're gonna be grumpy, So you
could try to have the best attitude, but you're going
to be grumpy when you have a rock in your shoe.
And that's what chronic pain is like. And guys, this
is just five pounds of fat, but that five pounds
of fat on your joint feels like fifty pounds when
(45:31):
you're carrying it around. And so that's the beauty of
the compounding benefit. When you're getting healthy at the cellular level,
you're going to lose the fat, which that's better for
your joint. You're going to regrow your cartilage, which is
that's better for your joint, But that intercellular hydration is
also going to create new neural pathways in your brain.
Speaker 15 (45:50):
Which gives you a better mindset and makes you joyful
and happy like when you were a child. Yeah, well
I could speak from experience. It really is a life
changing program.
Speaker 1 (46:01):
Or urge everyone to go out there watch the masterclass
on the website.
Speaker 2 (46:05):
John, I'm going to.
Speaker 1 (46:06):
Tell people how to find you, guys and benefit.
Speaker 2 (46:08):
From all of this. Here's what I want you to do.
Go to energizedhealth dot com. That's energizedhealth dot com.
Speaker 1 (46:15):
There is a free masterclass there, and again I would
really say go through some of the testimonials. You will
see somebody that looks like you, sounds like you, experiencing
things that you do.
Speaker 2 (46:25):
Listen to what they have to say. There's hundreds of them.
Speaker 1 (46:27):
And by the way, they got a money back guarantee
like you wouldn't believe. So again, energizehealth dot com check
them out today. We're grateful for their support of this program.
Speaker 2 (46:36):
All right.
Speaker 1 (46:36):
Up next, we share a wholesome moment from this year's
White House Easter celebration. All right, well, the media is
busy slamming President Trump. You think they'll show you this
(46:57):
moment with him out on the lawn for the Easter
roll today?
Speaker 2 (47:01):
Watch.
Speaker 4 (47:07):
I'm really into this.
Speaker 13 (47:09):
I'm really into this get stuff.
Speaker 2 (47:12):
We don't have a white rayon.
Speaker 12 (47:13):
What am I gonna do?
Speaker 13 (47:14):
Leave the wedding, leave the whole thing way, Okay, smile
up their kids.
Speaker 2 (47:25):
Well, look he's coloring with the kids the meeting.
Speaker 1 (47:28):
He's not going to show you that. By the way,
he's a great granddad. He's got a whole bunch of grandkids.
Speaker 2 (47:33):
He knowes had a color for crying out loud.
Speaker 1 (47:35):
He does all kinds of things with his grandkids, and
it's great stuff. Happy Easter to all of you. I
hope you all had a great weekend. And uh now
we start the process again. So if you're all from
work today, good for you. If now, we'll see you
back here tomorrow night. Spinfield's Army Rolls. Thanks for watching.
Well, good evening everyone, Welcome to Stinchfield. You know, it's
really starting to bother me that some of President Trump's
most staunchest enemies come from inside his own administration. We
dealt with this the last time around. Apparently there are
still some holdovers. I don't know if you saw this
op ad piece written by a top aide to Pete
(00:42):
Haigesath from inside the Pentagon, somebody who left his post
this week saying that the Pentagon isn't an absolute tailspin. Well,
this dude by the name of John Ulliot worked for
the Trump administration the last time around as a public
affairs specialist in the first administration.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
He's there for Pete.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
Claims that the Secretary of Defense is his great friend,
as he goes to slam him over and over again,
causing all kinds of headaches for President Trump.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
Now, either you're a grandstander or you.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Are jealous of Pete haig Seth for the position that
he's in. Either way, the president doesn't need these types
of people spouting off over and over and over again.
All of his stems from the old story about the
signal chat, this time allegedly a new signal chat related
to the same strikes in Yemen has now popped up
(01:35):
saying that Pete Haig Sath's wife and brother in law,
and the media never mentions that the brother in law
also works inside the Defense Department was on.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
One of these signal chats. None of that matters, It's
an old story.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
What does matter is that those inside, if you have concerns,
take them up with the administration privately, not in politico.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Here's Caroline Levitt.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
Heg Seth was nominated for this position because he is
standing up for the war fighter, the men and women
in uniform who are putting their lives on the line
to protect our country and our homeland.
Speaker 2 (02:09):
And unfortunately, there have.
Speaker 3 (02:11):
Been people at that building who don't like the change
the Secretary is trying to bring. So they are leaking
and they are lying to the mainstream media.
Speaker 2 (02:18):
We've seen this game played before.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
The Secretary is doing a tremendous job and the President
stands strongly behind him.
Speaker 1 (02:26):
Quite frankly, Secretary Headseth doesn't need the headaches. President Trump
doesn't need the headaches. And so I would imagine this
John Ulliott is probably jealous and still connected to the
deep state, probably both.
Speaker 2 (02:38):
It's disgusting.
Speaker 1 (02:39):
He goes to Politico for all of this, when you
could take it up with the administration directly. If you
think there's problems, let them solve them from the inside,
not play in and out in the mainstream media that's
doing great damage to President Trump and his quest to
make America great again. Here's Pete Haigs Seth responding to
it all.
Speaker 4 (02:56):
Oh, what a big surprise that a bunch of a
few leakers get fired and suddenly a bunch of hit
pieces come out from the same media that pedaled the
Russia hopes won't get back their Pulitzers.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
They got poltus for.
Speaker 5 (03:08):
A bunch of lies, Pulitzers for a bunch of lies,
and on hoax's time and time and time again. And
as they peddle those lives, no one ever calls them
on it.
Speaker 1 (03:21):
All you need to know is this top aid to
Pete Haig thatth who wrote this opinion piece in Politico
is where he went to write it Politico. Really, I
want to bring in now in Washington, d C. Outside
the White House, Real America's voice, chief White House correspondent.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
My good friend Brian Glenni is with us. Brian, welcome,
back to the program.
Speaker 6 (03:39):
Thanks thanks Bren, Brian, great to be here.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
You know, the president doesn't need this. Pete Haggseth doesn't
need this. I'm sure the media is falling over this.
But this is an old story, is it not.
Speaker 6 (03:51):
Brian, Yeah, this is just Signal Gate two point zero.
It's just rinse and repeat. You've got that function on
your washing machine as well. I think his comments at
this Easter egg roll and he addressed the media about
this says it all. This is a story that and
like you said, there were a few details that were
(04:13):
left out in this.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Story and also anonymous sources.
Speaker 6 (04:17):
I think when you have a story based upon anonymous
sources and there's other variants that are so mysterious about
what makes up this story and what's it's intended to do.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
At the end of the.
Speaker 6 (04:29):
Day, why have this come out? This does not do
does it do this country any favor by having this happen.
They are simply trying to block the progress that President
Trump and his whole entire team is doing.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
Right now, Brian, I've got my thoughts about what they
think of Pete haig Seth, and they meaning deep staters
in trenched bureaucrats whatever you want to call them inside
the Pentagon. Why do you think they're so afraid of
Pete hagg Seth right now?
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Well, because he's not interested.
Speaker 6 (05:03):
And this is just my personal opinion of just leading
us into these endless wars that we've been getting ourselves
into for so long. I think some of these intel
people have misled this the previous administration in times and
this is a tradition of what they do here in DC.
As you know, it's the military industrial complex. They're in
(05:25):
the business of war. They're in the business of manipulating war.
And I think that head Seth is a man of
the troops. He's a man's man in all of this
that people love him. He's got a lot of leadership skills.
He's kind of a no bs kind of guy. He
bucks the traditional system of what they're used to and
this person in this position, so I think at the
(05:45):
end of the day, he's a disruptor, but in a
good way. He's a disruptor, and they simply don't want
him to succede. All right, Brent, let me ask you.
Speaker 1 (05:53):
I've got a lot of friends that work in the
military outside of the Pentagon.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
A few inside the Pentagon.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
I was not under the assumption that the Pentagon, the
Department Defence, is in any kind of a tail spin.
In fact, I thought morale was being restored to the troops,
that we were taking the fight to our enemies better
than we have in the last four years under Joe Biden.
And yet this piece you read in political looks like
it's utter chaos there. Do you have any indications that
(06:22):
the Pentagon is not in decent shape right now as
he makes it out to be in this political piece.
Speaker 6 (06:29):
No, there's no other indication that they are in a
tail spin. Where's the people coming out saying this? Where
are they are? They're not holding press conferences? Are they
not identifying themselves as being very particular on what their
concerns are? So I think it's a nothing burger. But
that's what we've been served up by the leftist media
(06:51):
for far too long, and I think they're very desperate
kind of you know, kind of rehashing an old story
that quite honestly had about a but a seven to
eight day life cycle the last time, and it was
shut down. So this time I think it gets shut
down by the end of the tonight.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
Well, as you know, Buddy, I respect your opinion, your insight.
You have such great contacts in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
At so many levels.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
So I want to tell everybody at home, if Brian
tells you to, you can take it to the bank.
And again, this is the mainstream media that is doing
everything they can, as you said, Brian, to derail President
Trump and Pete Hagseth because they're afraid of what they're
doing in this country and that is making it great again.
Brian Glenn always, I hope you had a great easter.
Thanks for coming on today.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
Thank you, Grant, appreciate it. Thanks for having me, absolutely, buddy,
always a pleasure.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
All right, folks, I want to turn out of the
Supreme Court ruling over the weekend. The Supreme Court again
total disappointment. Basically, he puts a stay on President Trump's
plans to deport many of these MS thirteen gang members
under the Alien Enemies Act.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Saying oh no, we got a pause? Is this play
is out now?
Speaker 1 (08:00):
I just want you to hear the dissenting opinion from.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
Justice Alito in all of this, and when you read.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
It, this seems to be more the truth than what
the Supreme Court did. By putting a stay on all
of this. Take a look it reads.
Speaker 2 (08:17):
In the dissenting opinion by Alito.
Speaker 1 (08:19):
Literally in the middle of the night, the Court issued
unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts
a chance to rule, without hearing from the opposing party,
within eight hours of receiving the application, with dubious factual
support for its order, and without providing any explanation for
its order.
Speaker 2 (08:40):
Now that is the dissenting opinion.
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Of course, the Supreme Court are very short ruling said hey,
you gotta stop deporting people under this.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
So what can be done now?
Speaker 1 (08:53):
I want to bring in former Trump attorney Claremont Institute
senior fellow and a great constitutional expert.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
Are good friend John Eastman this year John, welcome to
the program, Grant.
Speaker 7 (09:04):
Thanks for having me back on What a way to
spend Easter weekend watching this roller coaster ride.
Speaker 2 (09:08):
I tell you, well, it's amazing. John.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
You know I will say I had thought and now
forgive me if it was you that tipped me off
to this idea, and because there's so much information but
that the President may not have needed to use the
Alien Enemies Act, and by using it, he opened himself
up to legal interpretation. Others says, no, it's not open
(09:33):
to legal interpretation. But could he not have just said, Hey,
I'm the president of the United States. I can deport
anybody I want if they're here with no papers.
Speaker 7 (09:41):
Well, the problem is there's a whole mechanism under the
immigration laws that have been passed by Congress that require
immigration judges and Board of Immigration Appeals.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
And all that.
Speaker 7 (09:52):
The one thing the Alien and Enemies Act does two
things is it expedites that process, and it also provides
for almost no judicial review, which it recognizes the president's
sole authority under the Constitution in times of war or
when as he claims that we are you know, there's
(10:13):
this incursion, this systematic incursion by foreign enemies of the
United States into the United States, and so he exercised,
he asserted the Alien Enemies Act in order to expedite
him ability to act as commander in chief and defend
the country.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
All right, So, John, how do we get to a point?
Speaker 1 (10:32):
And I trust you would you say, and others have
reiterated what you say that this is not open to
judicial review. Yet we've got lower federal courts reviewing it judicially.
And then the Supreme Court weighs in to try to
review it judicially.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
How do we get to this point, Well, what.
Speaker 7 (10:50):
Was most bizarre about what happened over the weekend is,
in fact, the lower courts had not ruled that. You know,
the claim by the ACLU that the district court denied
their temporary restraining order is a bit specious. They filed
the notice of appeal from that so called denial forty
(11:11):
two minutes after they filed for the temporary restraining order
on Good Friday, and the district court judge and I'm
looking at it, give me a little bit of time.
And they went ahead and filed it anyway, and then
it gets up to the Fifth Circuit. The appeal deprived
the district court of jurisdiction to continue looking at it,
and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that we
(11:32):
don't have jurisdiction because there's no temporary restraining order denial here,
and so it was a farce. And you know, then
you get to the Supreme Court and they asked for
emergency relief, and as Justice Alito points out in his descent,
it's unprecedented. Why is it unprecedented? Well, the Department of
Justice pointed out later in a filing later on Saturday
(11:53):
that the people that were the named parties in the
case were already had habeas corpus petitions pending in the
district court. They weren't being removed at all, and so
what they are seeking is relief on behalf of some
unnamed members of a class that had not even been certified.
That's what's unprecedented about it.
Speaker 1 (12:14):
You know, not to get too deep in the legal
leeds here, but when you talk about a class a
class action lawsuit, President Trump has dumned NEVIS thirteen a
foreign terrorist organization. Are the courts dubbing terrorists now a
class of people?
Speaker 7 (12:29):
Well, this is what the Department of Justice filing on
Saturday night points out. We don't even know who they're
talking about because there's been no class. It's anybody he
wants to deport on the alien enemy deck. Well, the
Supreme Court a couple of weeks ago said you've got
to bring habeas petitions in the district where they're currently incarcerated.
That means you cannot have a nationwide class because every
(12:52):
individual seeking habeas corpus relief is going to have different
factual circumstances, that's not susceptible. The class action review and
Justice Alito and the Department of Justice all point that out.
And how unprecedented the Supreme Court putting a stop to
this given those circumstances.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
So then I've got to ask you, John, with all
your experience with the Supreme Court, what is going on here?
Amy comy parent seems to be a total disappointment.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
What's happening? You know?
Speaker 7 (13:20):
I think I think the Court is upset that the
president has powers that he can exercise without the Court
graving him permission, and they're trying to assert their authority.
The bigger issue going on here is the question of
judicial supremacy versus merely judicial review, and particularly on separation
(13:41):
of powers, core separation of powers issues, where the Constitution's
Article two quite clearly vests the final say not in
a court, not in any court, not even in the
Supreme Court, but in the elected president of the United States.
Speaker 2 (13:55):
And we are having a monumental.
Speaker 7 (13:59):
Pissing content between the branches of government here about who
has authority to exercise the president's power.
Speaker 1 (14:06):
What you're talking about here is an ego contest at
the highest levels of who has more power than the
other person.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
Why can't we just go back to the Constitution and
see you as the power.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
I believe you when you say the president has the power.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
Many other legal experts say it.
Speaker 1 (14:25):
So we now have a Supreme Court that has an
ego so big they want the power?
Speaker 2 (14:29):
Is that literally what we're talking about.
Speaker 7 (14:33):
In a prior era, and the Supreme Court would deal
with questions of a commander in chief authority foreign affairs
authority has vested exclusively in the president and presenting non
justiciable political questions to the courts because they don't act
with the information that is available to the president. And
the Constitution deliberately assigns the ultimate and authority over such
(14:57):
questions to the elected president of the United States. That's
how the courts, in my view, should be designing these things.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
There.
Speaker 7 (15:04):
These are getting right into the middle of pre presidential
powers and we have really no competency to address all
of the information, the intelligence that he has before him
that's allowing him to make these decisions.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
All right, Thomas and Alito seem to be the most conservative.
Do you think President Trump made a mistake with Amy
Cony Barrett and quite possibly Kavanaugh in appointing them with
the Supreme Court.
Speaker 7 (15:32):
Well, I don't know the answer to that. It's you know,
one never knows how people are going to act when
they get on the court. And I because the Court
did not write an opinion, it just issued this order,
it's hard to see what their reasoning is. And so
I'm gonna I'm going to hold back just a touch
and see if we can see some reasoning come out
(15:53):
of this to explain what it is they did over
the weekend.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
All right, well, well, as we get more information that
comes back, we'll get you back on here to keep
explaining this stuff. It gets complicated, But in the end,
I really believe this has now come down the egos
and who wants the power as everything comes down to
in Washington, DC, which is what people are so fed
up with. Johnny Eastman has always it's great having you
on the program.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
Thank you, sir, Thank you, Grant. Take care absolutely you
two folks. I just want to show you one picture.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
This is President Trump holding up a picture you know
ten for the guys behind the glass you can see this.
This is President Trump holding up a picture of the
hands of the so called marilynd Man Remember this is
the now domestic abuser. This is the MS thirteen gang members.
Those are knuckles with an MS thirteen tattoo on the knuckles.
(16:42):
And this Van Holland who went down to visit him,
which everybody's making such a crazy deal over. I guess
didn't ask the most important question of this MS thirteen
gang member, Hey are you one roll it?
Speaker 8 (16:57):
But since you were the one person to have met
with him, and since this is a thing you say
on social media, it's what we hear from Donald Trump
and Republicans every day, all day long, you didn't ask him.
Speaker 9 (17:10):
I didn't ask him that because I know what his
answer is.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
You don't know what his answer is. You don't want
to know the answer.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
That's why you didn't ask him. So the Democrats can
keep defending MS thirteen gang members here and see how
this works out for you. The American people are not
on your side. I don't want to turn down a
foreign policy. Let's talk about Ukraine and Israel first. We'll
start with Ukraine. Peace talks are not going well. President
Trump and Marc or Rubio has made this clear. Now
(17:41):
if it doesn't look like they're going to be able
to get a deal. The America that I know and
love under President Trump has got to cut bait listen
to this.
Speaker 10 (17:52):
So we came here yesterday to sort of begin to
talk about more specific outlines of what it might take
to and to war to try to figure out very soon.
And I'm talking about a matter of days, not a
matter of weeks, whether or not this is a war
that can be ended. If it can, We're prepared to
do whatever we can to facilitate that and make sure
that it happens that it ends in a durable and
(18:13):
just the way. If it's not possible, if we're so
far apart that this is not going to happen, then
I think the President's probably at a point where he's
going to say, well, We're.
Speaker 2 (18:21):
Done, folks.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
That was a spot that I've been at for a
very very long time. If it cannot be worked out,
the American taxpayer should not be put on the dole
to pay for this.
Speaker 2 (18:33):
War in Ukraine.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
All right now, I want to turn it to Israel.
People that I trust are now telling me that there
is a very good chance that Israel is going to
go into Gaza in a very big way to end
this Hamas nonsense.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
Once and for all.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
But before that can happen, they've got to take care
of some other enemies like the Hohotis and quite possibly Iran.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
What does all of this mean?
Speaker 1 (18:57):
I want to bring in the man who tipped me
off to this with his idea of what could possibly happen.
Former Green Beret and host of Speak the Truth podcast,
our friend Matt Tardio is with us.
Speaker 2 (19:07):
Matt, welcome back to the show.
Speaker 9 (19:09):
Hey Grant, thanks for having me back.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
All right, it's always a pleasure.
Speaker 1 (19:13):
I found it fascinating your assessment of the potential for
a massive conflict, conflict now with many facets. Can you
explain to me what you see here that could potentially
happen over the next few days?
Speaker 11 (19:28):
Right, So, like you just saw what Marco Rubio is saying,
we've only got a matter of.
Speaker 9 (19:33):
Days to figure this out. And I believe you actually said that.
Speaker 11 (19:35):
What last Thursday or Friday is when Marco Rubio said that,
And so that matter of days matters when we start
talking about the Middle East as well, because prior to
October seventh, about fifty percent of the petroleum that's rolling
through the Seuic Canal all.
Speaker 9 (19:47):
Belonged to Russian.
Speaker 11 (19:49):
All of it belonged to Russia, and a major portion
of their exports and a lot of the money that
they're making in order to fund this war over inside
of Ukraine was coming from the oil exports that they
were sending out in through the seue Is Canal and
up over into Asia. Because Joe Biden, the one thing
he actually got right, ended up slapping sanctions on right, Well,
they had to offload that oil somewhere. So when the
Hoothi's end up closing out the Suez Canal, well, guess what,
(20:11):
all of a sudden, Russia has got an advantage on
the global economy and they're able to send all of
that oil up over to Asia at a much cheaper price.
If so facto they can sell it off and they
can actually fund their war effort. But it goes deeper
than that, because now we've got to talk about a
run today. Did you see what came out today, Grant?
Did you happen to see it? Because a run Russia
ended up signing a new agreement. So they ended up
(20:32):
signing a new agreement today that said, weller number one,
we're going to end up developing a brand new banking
system that's going to allow us to send money back
and forth to each other without having to deal with
the international banks. Therefore, the sanctions aren't going to matter.
But a run all right, has been funding the hooth
He's down inside Yemen. They're going to go, and you
know in the US has been bombing the crap out
of them. I think over today we I mean the
(20:54):
Hoothy media has been reporting I think it was like
twenty five or twenty seven sorties that, like the US
Navy has just been flying and bombing crap out of
them today. Right, But with all of that being said,
once that Red Sea is back open, that means the
Suez Canal.
Speaker 9 (21:05):
Is back open for international traffic.
Speaker 11 (21:07):
Eighty percent of the traffic through the Red Sea ended
up getting shut down when the HOOTI started, you know,
doing what they do, sinking five merchant vessels, killing numerous
merch sailors, on and on and on. So as soon
as that's back open, Russia's oil, cheap oil is done,
they're back competing.
Speaker 9 (21:21):
With everybody else.
Speaker 11 (21:22):
EU lost an estimate one hundred and sixty four billion
dollars because of this garbage last year. So before Israel
goes into Gaza. They've got to worry about Iran, who
very well has nuclear weapons, very very well. The IAEA
International Agency Atomic Energy ends up coming out and saying,
you know what, we think Iran has sixty percent and
rich uranium, about six hundred pounds worth of it. They
(21:43):
ended up determining a couple months ago that Iran has
two uranium enrichment sides just south of Teyran, just south
of Teyran, that they did not announce, and that they
did not disclose. The IAA in in.
Speaker 9 (21:55):
In regulation with the mpt RelA Feration Treaty.
Speaker 1 (22:00):
So they've got to do something about that. If that's
the case, you would also say correct that if Israel
goes into Gaza in a big way, you think there
could be a drone attack of thousands of drones going
into Israel and to thwart that, you've got to take
care of Iran first.
Speaker 2 (22:15):
Do I have it right?
Speaker 11 (22:17):
Not just not just drones. You know, if it was
just drones, we were worried about Grant. We've moved so
much firepower. The United States government has moved so much
firepower and the release it's not even funny. But now
we're talking about ballistic and cruise missiles that very well
could be nuclear capable now heading up over into Israel.
In addition to that, we got to worry about all
of the US service members that are also stage over
inside of a rock right and across the Middle Ease.
(22:38):
We saw US service members withdrawing from inside of Syria
just last week. Now all of that matters for a reason,
because we moved an entire patriot battery, something that we're
going to rely upon in order to shoot down these
ballistic missiles if Iran ends up shooting them. We moved
an entire patriot battery out of pay Com or like
the Pacific Area of Command up over into Sentcom the
Central Area of Command. General Carilla is on his way
(22:58):
over to Israel, and we just had Bengivir laying in
the United States today.
Speaker 1 (23:03):
All right, so all of this looks like a massive
escalation real quick. If you can for me in thirty seconds,
over the next few days, what do you think happens?
Speaker 2 (23:09):
Do you think we see strikes on Iran?
Speaker 11 (23:12):
I think over the next couple of days. But it's
going to end up happening. Is Donald Trump, along with
his entire SECURITYFF, is going to end up sitting around
making some very difficult decisions. I don't think you can
trust Iran as far as that you can throw them.
And when you start weighing it out with just open
source information my ticket and I start processing it all
I can assess about a fifty percent probability iron has
a nuclear weapon. Israel's abount to roll on Rafa, They're
about to roll on Gays the city. They're about to
(23:34):
start crushing Hamas. And you have to say, does Iran
have a fifty percent or better probability of having a
nuclear weapon?
Speaker 9 (23:40):
Is that something you want to risk. If that's the.
Speaker 11 (23:42):
Case and you do want to risk it, well there
it is. If not, then we got to bond the
crap out of them.
Speaker 2 (23:47):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
It's fascinating stuff and it's amazing the assessments you're able
to come up with looking at this stuff from your
experiences of Green Beret, and of course it's your knowledge
of looking at some of this information in your context
where they are. Matt Tardio, as always, thank you for
coming on. I urge people to check out your podcast
as well.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
Thank you, buddy.
Speaker 9 (24:05):
Thanks Grey appreciate having me.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
Absolutely look folks and a lot of people aren't talking
about this, Like the whole Israel thing is outside the
news realm. Right now, We're not going to forget about it,
all right, think about it. Every dollar you spend either
supports your values or works against them.
Speaker 2 (24:20):
Where you spend it matters.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
I'm talking about Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
Lets you take a stand without sacrificing quality. Get exceptional
nationwide coverage with access to all three major US networks.
Add two numbers on one phone, something the big carriers
can't match. Enjoy flexible unlimited data plans with high speed.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
Data hotspots and more.
Speaker 1 (24:42):
Switching is easy, keep your number phone or upgrade. Our
one hundred percent US based team activates you in minutes.
Joined today at patriotmobile dot com.
Speaker 2 (24:53):
All right, up, Next, I will.
Speaker 1 (24:55):
Have the conversation with the forensic accountant who uncovered Letitia James,
this trail of alleged mortgage fraud. This is the guy
behind now this criminal referral.
Speaker 2 (25:07):
Did not want to miss his interview. That's next. Welcome
back everyone, Remember Letitia James.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
This is the attorney general in New York who went
after President Trump with a vengeance for a small record
keeping case that she turned into, you know, felony extraordin air.
She now has some big problems on her hands because
she may be guilty of all kinds of mortgage fraud.
One of the allegations is she put a residence in
Virginia as her primary residence. We know what that means
(25:43):
when you try to claim a homestead and it must
be your primary residence. But she's in New York as
the Attorney General. How could it be? Well, the Daily
Caller showed up at that house in Virginia, did they
find her?
Speaker 9 (25:56):
Are you related to Letitia James?
Speaker 2 (25:58):
Do you know her?
Speaker 12 (26:00):
Go with the house?
Speaker 2 (26:01):
Do you know?
Speaker 9 (26:02):
Okay, thank you man, Thank you man, Thank you, ma'am.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
You have a good one.
Speaker 1 (26:08):
Well, the answer is no, she wasn't there. So how
did this all come about? It's a fascinating story. The
man who uncovered it describes himself as a former Wall
Street criminal turned fraud investigator. For those of you like
me from the northeast Tri State area, he may remember
Crazy Eddies all right, he was the CFO. He now
(26:29):
runs a website called White Collar Fraud. He's the one
that found all of these details about Alicia James's alleged
mortgage fraud and maybe Sam Antar, is it safe to
say your investigation is insane.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
Or is that joke not good? Sam?
Speaker 13 (26:47):
Thank you for having me on the investigation is insane?
Speaker 1 (26:51):
Well, let me ask you, how did you get started
on this and why don't you lay out briefly exactly
what you uncovered here?
Speaker 14 (26:59):
First of all, have the Troy will get the camera. Okay,
what happened was I've been after crazyies. I started working
as a forensic accountant, teaching law enforcement agencies of major corporations,
doing whistleblower work for law firms. I actually won a
whistleblow reward over seven figures one time. I've been doing
(27:21):
and I've been teaching, so this is something I've been
doing for the last thirty years. I know every trick
in the book, every trick that they that's not in
the book, and every trick that they think.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
They're going to do.
Speaker 13 (27:31):
Because I was on both sides of the law, Sam.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
It sounds to me like she wasn't even smart about
her tricks, and she's an attorney general.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
It was right there for you to see, was it not? Well?
Speaker 14 (27:43):
She probably figured that Biden was going to win reelection,
and that nobody.
Speaker 13 (27:47):
Would catch her.
Speaker 14 (27:48):
You see what happened was I was doing a lot
of work on New York City politicians and New York
City's financing. I stumbled upon her, and that's how I
got to her. I didn't target her or anything like that.
I'm not a member of the Trump administration. I'm not
a Republican, I hate to say, itty, I'm a Democrat.
And I did what I had to do, all.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
Right, So what exactly did you find? There's the issues
in New Jersey, there's issues with properties in Brooklyn. There's
this issue of her father being listed as her husband.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Play it out for me what you found.
Speaker 14 (28:25):
Okay, let me break it out for you. First of all,
you have two Virginia properties. The first Virginia property she
purchased two weeks before the Trump trial in August of
two thousand and twenty three. On that property, there was
a mortgage filed, but part of the mortgage that was
(28:47):
filed was a Swan declaration stating her intent to occupy
that house as her primary residence with the co owner,
and the mortgage was structured that both owners, her and
her niece to co ownA had to had to occupy
the house. Now, do you believe that she wasn't going
(29:08):
Do you believe that she really intended to move to
Virginia because before the Trump trial?
Speaker 2 (29:13):
No way, No, She's going to also, haven't. This is
the document Sam, you found.
Speaker 1 (29:21):
I want to put it up on the screen and
I'll read it real quickly for you because it's very,
very simple.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
This was through a power of attorney.
Speaker 1 (29:27):
She highlighted I hereby declare that I intend to occupy
this property as my principal residence.
Speaker 13 (29:34):
You put that on and with by somebody, by a
chief steputy in her office.
Speaker 2 (29:40):
Go ahead. What kind of crime is that now? In
the big scheme of.
Speaker 14 (29:44):
Things, mail, wire freud, mortgage fraud. I'm not a lawyer,
but I can think of at least three from my background.
But the pointing is she had to move into that
house within sixty days.
Speaker 2 (29:56):
She never did.
Speaker 14 (29:58):
And it seems like from some of the press I've
been reading that I cannot verify because I only verify
my own work, is that that that other party didn't
move in until way past the sixty day mark.
Speaker 1 (30:11):
All right, what is the next situation with her labeling
her father as her husband?
Speaker 14 (30:18):
That was Joe Gilbert found that Gateweight pundit. He found
that he found that nineteen eighty three or eighty four,
I'm not sure exactly the year that the deed was
in her father and her name as father and daughter,
but the mortgage was a husband.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
And wife, which is you know, a lot of people
would say, Okay, she's doing this. It has to be
for two reasons, and the two cases we're talking about.
One is to get a favorable tax benefit. If you
say it's your own house and you have homestead, you
also have some legal protections with the home instead and
(30:57):
getting a favorable what's that No hamsteads were filed in Virginia? Okay,
and then and so why would she claim it's your
principal residence.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
Is that for a favorable mortgage rate?
Speaker 14 (31:08):
Then apople mortgage rate? Yes, absolutely, it's also on the
brook and property. Over the last twenty years, she's been
representing the numbers one, two, and three, but the.
Speaker 13 (31:18):
CFO says five.
Speaker 14 (31:19):
In fact, right before I get out of the air,
that's why I'm a little bit crazy today. Right before
I got in the year, I posted a new blog
showing that the electrical service to the building shows five units.
So she's now in our life, she's been telling the
press war units. It's always been that way. No, the
certificate of Activeasey says five units.
Speaker 2 (31:39):
You know.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
So she's claiming it's a residence for one person when
it's a multiple residents. That means it's an income producers
residence for four people.
Speaker 14 (31:49):
But her mortgage is say sometimes one person, two residents is,
three residents is or four? But number five, because five
brings you into the commercial loan area, we have to
pay a higher rate. Now, not only does it's a
CFO says five, and you can't, you know, New York,
(32:10):
if you don't follow the CFO, the building's apartment comes
down on every evandlord that tries to screw around with
that is that is the gold stand.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
Now.
Speaker 14 (32:19):
The second thing I found just now that well today
was the electrical service to the building shows five units.
Speaker 13 (32:27):
So what is she gonna say?
Speaker 15 (32:28):
Now?
Speaker 1 (32:30):
Well, then, the last question I have for you, have
you found any evidence that someone in a position of power,
political power, was protecting her, was pushing this stuff through,
making sure nobody asked any.
Speaker 2 (32:41):
Questions which put it this way?
Speaker 14 (32:43):
From looking over forty years of documents and instances of
about maybe twenty thirty. Every single mortgage, It's put it
that way, every single mortgage has false information.
Speaker 13 (32:58):
It's not an accident. She didn't get she didn't do
this by yourself. There had to be other people involved.
I don't know if it's the appraisers, the title company,
the loan offs is. You can't do this by yourself
and get.
Speaker 15 (33:09):
Away with it.
Speaker 1 (33:11):
Last question for you, there's a criminal inquiry now a
referral to look into this.
Speaker 2 (33:16):
Were you actually responsible over that? Did you hand this
stuff over to the Justice Department.
Speaker 13 (33:21):
Most of the work that was in the referral came
from me, not all of it. Some of it came
from Joe Gilbert, and some of it came from other sources.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
Well, it's fascinating stuff. Sam Antar.
Speaker 1 (33:31):
As a Democrat, I'm not open thanking democrats out there,
but on this one, I thank you because she went
after President Trump with a vengeance. So you know, what
comes around goes around in the scheme of things, and
I appreciate your work on this.
Speaker 13 (33:44):
I agree with you.
Speaker 14 (33:45):
We have to have a rule of law in America,
irrespective of what are you from the left or from
the right.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
Now that I've had you on once. I'm gonna work
on you over the next year or so, and I'm
gonna get you a flip. I'm going to have you
as a Republican by the by the end of here,
Sam an are thank you so much for coming on today.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
We appreciate it, okay, folks.
Speaker 1 (34:03):
In New Hampshire, a state representative, Republican of course, says
she was fired from her day job overcomments she made
defending girls' only spaces.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
We'll talk about this next well, folks.
Speaker 1 (34:28):
Apparently speaking out for what's right, speaking out for what
you believe in can have great consequences in this country, Savagy.
Speaker 2 (34:35):
The left is going off the deep end.
Speaker 1 (34:37):
With their censorship, with their cancel culture. I'm here to
say enough is enough. In New Hampshire, a Republican state
representative felt the need to speak out against biological boys
occupying girls' bathrooms in the middle school, of all places,
and she says she got fired for that from her
(34:58):
longtime job.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
This is what she said at the school board.
Speaker 12 (35:02):
Little girls shouldn't have to be afraid to use the
bathroom and hold it all day.
Speaker 2 (35:07):
And I think we can all.
Speaker 9 (35:08):
Agree that that should not be happening.
Speaker 2 (35:10):
It's painful for them.
Speaker 13 (35:13):
That shouldn't happen.
Speaker 12 (35:16):
This school board needs to create a clear and fair
policy that protects every student stigmity, and we are to
have compassion for every student.
Speaker 1 (35:27):
Well, she got ac hued of being mean to the
student biological boy wanted to use the girls room. One
of her fellow representatives, a Democrat, actually tweeted this after
she got fired the next morning. Quote, it's probably just
a coincidence if it happened the morning after the school
board meeting. But that as it may, it doesn't look
good for a forty something adult to be picking on
(35:49):
a fourteen year old kid during a school board meeting,
regardless of gender, regardless of gender identity.
Speaker 2 (35:55):
I don't think she was picking on anybody.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
I think she was standing up for little girls who
don't want to be going to the bathroom with boys
in the bathroom.
Speaker 2 (36:04):
It is that simple. I want to bring in with
me now.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
New Hampshire State Representative Republican Lisa Maser is with us.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
Lisa, welcome to.
Speaker 9 (36:12):
The program, Hi Grant, thank you glad to be here.
Speaker 1 (36:16):
All right, So this is troubling to say to Lisa,
especially when I heard you got fired. There's bigger issues
than even that at play here though, Your response to
what happened to you and how are you assessing this
now after a few days have passed.
Speaker 16 (36:31):
Yeah, I'm still actually kind of reeling from it all,
you know, because a lot of people may not know this,
but in New Hampshire, we state reps. We only make
one hundred dollars a year before taxes, and so many
of us have to have full time jobs on the
side to pay the bills. And I had had this
full time job for going into my sixth year and
(36:55):
it was going great. So this Monday I had a
job and there was no inkling of anything negative. Tuesday
I spoke up at the school board meeting because I
had a lot of parents contact me when they found
out a little boy was using well he's not so little,
he's thirteen using their daughter's bathrooms, and they asked me
(37:17):
to speak up for them, and I always have in
my two three years of being a state Rep. I'm
going into my third, I've never been afraid to stand up.
But now I think it's even more important with what
we're seeing around the country, and it's crazy.
Speaker 1 (37:34):
You know, Representative Veser, I don't think what you said
was really out of line at all. Obviously, now we're
coming from the same place on this issue. But let
me play another clip of the people at home to decide.
Speaker 12 (37:46):
This isn't about judgment or discrimination. It's about ensuring safety,
privacy and comfort of all our students. Having this concern
for girls, does it make us transphobic? Then we're not
bullying as people. We're speaking up.
Speaker 1 (38:03):
So the school district say anything or are they're just
going to literally let boys into girls rooms?
Speaker 16 (38:11):
Yes, and we don't currently have a really solid law
to back us up.
Speaker 9 (38:18):
We're working on it, and so we have two.
Speaker 16 (38:21):
Bills going through the House and Senate right now that
will hopefully firm that up a bit. And ironically, this
coming week I sponsored two bills, one that will prohibit
puberty blockers and cross sex hormones and top surgeries in children.
And so coincidentally that's all happening this week too. Those
(38:44):
bills past the House, I'm presenting them in front of
the Senate this week and hopefully they'll be on their
way to the Governor's desk. So you know, New Hampshire
is a real hot a hot spot for this right now.
Speaker 1 (38:58):
Well, it's sure he is, and it is basically virtually
a swing state or Republicans and control in the state.
Speaker 16 (39:03):
House, yes, and the Senate.
Speaker 1 (39:06):
All right, So that's all right. So that's good news,
and so we'll see how this plays out. Lastly, I
want to ask you. I haven't reached out to your employer,
so I'm not going to name them. Could it be
a coincidence? Of course, I don't typically believe in coincidences,
especially when it comes to politics at this level.
Speaker 2 (39:24):
But did you confront them on this? Did they give
you a reason for it or no?
Speaker 15 (39:30):
No?
Speaker 16 (39:30):
I mean I spoke at the school board meeting tuesday night.
I got the call from the owner eight o'clock the
next morning, and we were pretty friendly. I mean, I've
been there for a while and we've always kept politics aside.
I even hid my last name, like in my work,
you know, when emailing people. I really tried to protect
(39:53):
the business and it has never been an issue. There's
never been a negative anything on me. So this was
all just And then when she called me, she was
cold as ice, like something a switch flipped. And it
was the next morning, and so coincidence maybe, but I
highly doubt it.
Speaker 1 (40:12):
I can tell you Something else that happens, and I've
heard stories before, is business owners that just want to
stay out of it get threatened by radical liberals who
start calling and making all kinds of threats against the business,
and they get scared and they do crazy things.
Speaker 2 (40:27):
Not saying that's what happened here, but you never know.
Speaker 1 (40:30):
It's a very sad spot that we live in a
time like this where you even have to consider that
that could.
Speaker 2 (40:34):
Be the possibility.
Speaker 1 (40:35):
Keep up the great work on fighting for Fighting for
Girls in New Hampshire. And Lisa Maser, we appreciate you
coming on the program today. Thank you and good luck
in the next job search. I guess thank you thank
you for having me absolutely. You know, folks, over the
course of what two decades, I've owned businesses, a.
Speaker 2 (40:54):
Number of them.
Speaker 1 (40:55):
I've probably employed over two hundred people at least. I
would never fire somebody if they wanted to go and
argue for pro choice issues, if they wanted to argue
these transgender nonsense, as long as they keep it out
of work, as long as they do their job. Well,
we're in America.
Speaker 2 (41:13):
They have a right to do anything.
Speaker 12 (41:14):
You know.
Speaker 1 (41:14):
Now, I'm basically we're employing truck drivers and auto technicians.
But I'm not going to squash somebody's right to free
speech as long as they're not bringing.
Speaker 2 (41:23):
That into the business.
Speaker 1 (41:25):
And too many businesses are doing that now, and they're
bowing to the radical left.
Speaker 2 (41:29):
That's the real crazy part of all of this.
Speaker 1 (41:31):
All right, I want you to become a part of
making America healthy again.
Speaker 2 (41:36):
It's a great movement. We're going to tell you how next.
Speaker 1 (41:49):
Welcome back everyone. I've told you a thousand times. I'm
a big believer of the Energized Health system. I lost
fifteen pounds in two weeks. All my levels went in
the right direction. Testosterone of cholesterol down, body fat loss,
muscle mass gained, all of it at Energized Health dot com.
Speaker 2 (42:07):
And I'm so grateful to the program.
Speaker 1 (42:08):
You know what another benefit was was how my body
dealt with chronic pain. It started to go away. That
chronic pain will get you depressed too, by the way,
I've been there where it starts to screw with your mind.
Speaker 2 (42:21):
Watch this little video here. I've survived accidents that should
have killed me.
Speaker 17 (42:26):
When I started this, my pain level was between seven
and eight twenty four to seven. I had chronic pain,
was not getting any relieve, and I did quite well.
I would say now it's at three to four. The
other thing is no more blood pressure medicine. I actually
don't take any medication anymore. But the biggest thing for
me is attitude change. But the tools that I've gotten
(42:47):
from here has changed my mindset, has changed how I
go forward. And the people around me are the ones
who comment about So that's what I'm encouraged by it.
Speaker 2 (42:58):
I'm not changing nothing. Here's what I want you to do.
Speaker 1 (43:01):
There are hundreds of testimonials like that on the Energized
Health website energizedealth dot com.
Speaker 2 (43:07):
Go watch some of them and you'll see what the
Energized Health program can do for you.
Speaker 1 (43:11):
I want to bring in now the founder of Energized Health,
my good buddy John Jubilee.
Speaker 2 (43:16):
John, Welcome. I hope you had a great easter.
Speaker 9 (43:19):
Well, great to see you, Grant have a spectacular easter.
Speaker 2 (43:22):
Thank you. Ah, that's good to hear. All right.
Speaker 1 (43:24):
So, chronic pain and energized health. This intercellular hydration helps
with pain. Can you explain to me how.
Speaker 2 (43:34):
Well?
Speaker 7 (43:34):
I sure can?
Speaker 18 (43:35):
And man, how many of you guys out there listening
listening to Grant and I. You know, you've got some
chronic pain, and maybe you're like me, you just thought
that's how your life's going to be. When I was
bone on bone and both of my knees, I just thought,
this is going to be my life. And then doctors
told me grant that my only way to get any
relief from that pain was to have two new knee replacements.
(43:58):
But lo and behold, through the patent pending science of
intracellular hydration, I was able to rebuild that natural cartilage
because as you pull in that intracellular hydration, it activates
your body's natural stem cells that we all already have.
You don't need to go to Mexico and spend twenty
thousand dollars to get stem cells. You have stem cells,
(44:20):
they're just dehydrated. And by activating that grant, it pushes
all the inflammation. It pushes the inflammation out, which is
the root cause of that chronic pain. And you don't
have to live with that pain, folks, you really don't.
I was told I was going to have to.
Speaker 2 (44:37):
It was a lie.
Speaker 18 (44:38):
And you can have you can have freedom from pain,
you can have it.
Speaker 2 (44:45):
All RD.
Speaker 1 (44:45):
So I look at it like this, because there's so
many benefits from getting hydrated at an intracellular level in
the science behind how you actually do that.
Speaker 2 (44:53):
But you lose that as you mentioned, the pain starts
to go away.
Speaker 1 (45:00):
You gain muscle mass as well, and then I'm thinking
of the mental aspect of all of this has to
be huge.
Speaker 2 (45:07):
Well, it is great.
Speaker 18 (45:09):
Just think about you know, if you were walking around
with the big rock in your shoe, you're going to
be kind of grumpy. You're gonna be grumpy, So you
could try to have the best attitude, but you're going
to be grumpy when you have a rock in your shoe.
And that's what chronic pain is like. And guys, this
is just five pounds of fat, but that five pounds
of fat on your joint feels like fifty pounds when
(45:31):
you're carrying it around. And so that's the beauty of
the compounding benefit. When you're getting healthy at the cellular level,
you're going to lose the fat, which that's better for
your joint. You're going to regrow your cartilage, which is
that's better for your joint, But that intercellular hydration is
also going to create new neural pathways in your brain.
Speaker 15 (45:50):
Which gives you a better mindset and makes you joyful
and happy like when you were a child. Yeah, well
I could speak from experience. It really is a life
changing program.
Speaker 1 (46:01):
Or urge everyone to go out there watch the masterclass
on the website.
Speaker 2 (46:05):
John, I'm going to.
Speaker 1 (46:06):
Tell people how to find you, guys and benefit.
Speaker 2 (46:08):
From all of this. Here's what I want you to do.
Go to energizedhealth dot com. That's energizedhealth dot com.
Speaker 1 (46:15):
There is a free masterclass there, and again I would
really say go through some of the testimonials. You will
see somebody that looks like you, sounds like you, experiencing
things that you do.
Speaker 2 (46:25):
Listen to what they have to say. There's hundreds of them.
Speaker 1 (46:27):
And by the way, they got a money back guarantee
like you wouldn't believe. So again, energizehealth dot com check
them out today. We're grateful for their support of this program.
Speaker 2 (46:36):
All right.
Speaker 1 (46:36):
Up next, we share a wholesome moment from this year's
White House Easter celebration. All right, well, the media is
busy slamming President Trump. You think they'll show you this
(46:57):
moment with him out on the lawn for the Easter
roll today?
Speaker 2 (47:01):
Watch.
Speaker 4 (47:07):
I'm really into this.
Speaker 13 (47:09):
I'm really into this get stuff.
Speaker 2 (47:12):
We don't have a white rayon.
Speaker 12 (47:13):
What am I gonna do?
Speaker 13 (47:14):
Leave the wedding, leave the whole thing way, Okay, smile
up their kids.
Speaker 2 (47:25):
Well, look he's coloring with the kids the meeting.
Speaker 1 (47:28):
He's not going to show you that. By the way,
he's a great granddad. He's got a whole bunch of grandkids.
Speaker 2 (47:33):
He knowes had a color for crying out loud.
Speaker 1 (47:35):
He does all kinds of things with his grandkids, and
it's great stuff. Happy Easter to all of you. I
hope you all had a great weekend. And uh now
we start the process again. So if you're all from
work today, good for you. If now, we'll see you
back here tomorrow night. Spinfield's Army Rolls. Thanks for watching.
Popular Podcasts
40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season
Daniel Jeremiah of Move the Sticks and Gregg Rosenthal of NFL Daily join forces to break down every team's needs this offseason.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.