January 30, 2025 • 47 mins
STINCHFIELD TONIGHT JANUARY 30TH, 2025
SEGMENT 1:D.C. PLANE CRASH LEAVES UNANSWERED QUESTIONS AS TRUMP QUESTIONS DEI POLICIES
SEGMENT 2:KASH PATEL AND TULSI GABBARD CONFIRMATION HEARINGS
SEGMENT 3 UNDER REPORTED: SERVICEMAN KILLED AFTER INJURED IN GAZA
SEGMENT 4:DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH ON RFK JR
SEGMENT 5:CHICAGO MAYOR JOHNSON SPOUTS OFF ON TRUMP -- LOOK WHO'S TALKING...
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Welcome to the program, folks. We have lots of questions
about how this horrific crash could happen as a American
Airlines flight is trying to land at Reagan International Airport
in Washington, DC, when a black Hawk helicopter basically out
of nowhere comes in and smashes into the plane, killing
(00:40):
nearly seventy people. Now, so who is to blame for this?
That's one of the questions we need to be asking.
How does it happen in this day and age, As
you see the video here, how in the world does
something like this happen? And we are learning tonight that
the air traffic control center there was quote understaffed, that
one air traffic control roller was doing the job of
(01:01):
two people that night. And this is right before the collision.
This is air traffic control trying to raise the black
Hawk helicopter.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Thanks your body insight.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
Some of the aircraft?
Speaker 1 (01:27):
All right, no response from the Blackhawk. Do you have
the plane in sight? The air traffic controller is asking,
and they get no response. Now, we went through and
we started looking at some of the very strange, erratic
movements of this helicopter. When you look at how this
helicopter flew and the plane there you see is the
(01:48):
helicopter makes some zigzag turns as it's coming down the
Potomac River, and then right before crashing into almost looked
like turning into this American Eagle flight landing there. So
you've got the erratic movements of this helicopter. Then I
found the elevation data for the Blackhawk helicopter. When it
(02:09):
took off, it started about eleven hundred feet, slowly descending
to about eight hundred feet, then to seven hundred feet.
Then right before the crash, about thirty seconds, the elevation
swiftly drops from seven hundred feet to four hundred feet.
And we know the crash took place at two hundred
and fifty feet, So why the sudden drop in elevation.
(02:33):
This is a serious issue now as we try to
place blame and figure out who is to blame. Of
course for all of this. This is Pete haigset, the
new Secretary of Defense, talking about the elevation issues.
Speaker 4 (02:45):
Military does dangerous things, it does routine things on the
regular basis. Tragically, last night a mistake was made. I
think the President is right. There was some sort of
an elevation.
Speaker 5 (02:56):
Issue that we have immediately begun investigating.
Speaker 1 (02:59):
At the DoD and Army level. We'll make one thing
very clear. Blackhawk helicopters fly up and down the Potomac
River very very regularly. These pilots and apparently the pilot
that was flying the black Hawk was a very seasoned pilot,
not new to this type of environment. Wearing night vision goggles.
That could pose an issue, But I'm not buying the
(03:19):
vision issues. These pilots fly this flight all the time.
This idea that the planes lights blended in with the
city lights, I just don't see it. So I look
at the erratic flight path, I look at the no
answer by the plane. I look at the fact that
a reasonable person would suspect there's a possibility this could
(03:43):
have been deliberate when you look at the video of
the helicopter literally smashing into the plane. And then, of
course we may never know the answers because we have
this problem. According to Lieutenant Colonel galb on Fox News.
Speaker 6 (03:57):
Now have a Blackhawk, this particular model of the Blackhawk
does not have that capability. So you have to go
off of the evidence that you get from either eyewitnesses,
radar tracks, and ATC recordings. Voice recordings, you're not going
to get a black off the Blackhawk that will help
you in that regard. So there's a chance that there's
(04:18):
very little on recording that will truly help this.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
So there is no voice recorder inside the Blackhawk helicopter.
There's no collision avoidance system like there is inside commercial
airliners inside a Blackhawk. That wouldn't make any sense. You
figure these Blackhawks are in battle, flying six seven eight
helicopters side by side. The collision avoidance would be going
off all the time. But the voice recorder, I maybe
(04:43):
can see in combat you can't have one in case,
god forbid, they fell into the hands of the enemy.
But flying missions in the United States, they ought to
have voice recorders. So what could have happened here? I'm
not pushing conspiracy theories. I'm only going to give you
a list of how I see it, of the things
investigators need to be looking at. Could have this been
(05:07):
pilot error or a deliberate act, or even terror on
behalf of the pilot. We have seen inside our own
military that they have engaged sometimes in terror style actions.
It has to be investigated. Not saying it's true, but
it has to be investigated. There's a human error factor
in all of this. Was there a mechanical issue? Was
(05:28):
the pilot working to try to keep the helicopter slow
and steady while dealing with mechanical issue? Is that why
he couldn't have responded? Then of course you've got to
wonder was there an air traffic control issue? And I
will tell you this, you can't rule out the possibility
(05:50):
of a computer hack. We've talked about the ability of
China to take over large yachts and even private jets.
We know this has proven to be true. We've had
sources inside the federal government that has said this is
to be true. And then I saw this news release
on the Lockheed Martin website. This is about a Blackhawk helicopter.
(06:11):
A matrix system it's called to can fly autonomously from
three hundred miles away. So if it has an autonomous
system on a Blackhawk, could the system somehow be hacked?
It is something you'd have to look at. This is
a promo video for that autonomous system by Lockheed Martin.
Speaker 7 (06:31):
There you're going to see the aircraft come up to
a stabilized hover and this is going to simulate testing
logistics operations.
Speaker 6 (06:41):
Where we would have a ground crew hooking up a
swing load to the aircraft.
Speaker 1 (06:45):
And this aircraft is called a position are partsully well,
it's fascinating technology. All of these are questions that need
to be answered. Every single aspect of this needs to
be investigated. And we'll get into air traffic control a
little bit later on in this program, but right now
(07:07):
I want to break down exactly what is going on
with the Blackhawk helicopter, and for that I want to
bring in now Marine Corps Colonel William Berner Dunn. He
is retired and welcome to the program. Colonel, it is
great to have you on the program.
Speaker 3 (07:29):
Hey, great, Hey, thanks for having me.
Speaker 8 (07:30):
I'm so we're getting together and meeting for the first
time on such a tragic event.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
It really is, and Colonel I'm glad you're on. You
flew attack helicopters when you look at this now. You
and I spoke this morning on my radio program. Have
you had any time over the last eight hours or
so to assess more of what possibly could have gone
down here?
Speaker 3 (07:55):
You know, I have. I watched the video, I've watched
it at length.
Speaker 8 (07:58):
I've listened to quite a bit of the commentary and
quite a bit of the air traffic control of what
they have And what I think we're going to find
out is the Blackhawk was probably looking at the wrong
aircraft when the ATC said see and avoid this jetliner.
(08:19):
I think they were looking at the one that was
taking off that you can see in some of the video,
and while they're focused on that, I think they lost
situational awareness and ended up in the flight path. No
matter what, they ended up in the flight path. So
we know that for a fact. The question is why
did they get into the flight path. As Secretary Heggsith
(08:40):
mentioned today, they've already started the mishap investigation, and I
think that's going to go a long way and help
it determine what actually happened. And one of the things
I want to bring out while.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
I can is is I have been pushing for over
two years now to.
Speaker 8 (08:55):
Get the Navy and the Marine Corps to put in
voice data recorders into all of our aircraft. And I
think in this instance, this show is exactly why I've
lost too many friends, and some of them we have
no idea why we lost them. They're just aircraft crashed
and we have no idea. I am a proponent of
putting them in, and I think that would help solve
(09:17):
these issues. And maybe what if shed light or will
shed light would have shed light into this particular incident.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
You know, I hate to be smirch the name of
any of these pilots because we don't know if there
was wrongdoing or not. You talk about some of the
crashes that your friends and colleagues have had over the
years that are still unknown. Does suicide cross your mind?
Is that a possibility? Will investigators look at that?
Speaker 3 (09:47):
I don't think so. They may look at it. You know,
I don't know how many.
Speaker 8 (09:52):
Pilots you know, but most pilots I know are very
very you know, we're all very self important, and that
is not a normal Although I have had some friends
commit suicide, that is not a normal concern that we have.
And I do not suspect that this aircrew purposely crashed
into this jet, all right.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
And that makes me feel better about things for sure,
though in this day and age. I'll tell you what,
everything that I've seen, what people out there watch have seen,
I just I don't rule out anything anymore. This idea
of night vision goggles, so apparently they were wearing them.
I've fooled around with night vision goggles. You turn the
lights on, it really causes quite an issue. Do they
(10:35):
help you in a city like Washington, d C. I
would think the night vision goggles could cause more of
a problem than help.
Speaker 8 (10:42):
Absolutely, I've got over a thousand hours of night vision
goggle time in the Cobra. They still will help you
see a jet airliner at night, but flying them and
flying with them in the city is difficult.
Speaker 3 (10:55):
Typically, what pilots do, and I will.
Speaker 8 (10:58):
Speak for myself, is they will lift up the goggles
so that what you're doing is you're looking under them,
and when you need to put them down.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
You can. Let me play a clip for you. This
is radio traffic. At first I thought they were talking
to the Blackhawk helicopter. Now I'm hearing they were talking
to a Coast Guard chopper. Maybe you could help me
decipher who air traffic Control is talking to when they're
talking about going back to base. Let's roll cut seven
zero three thousand America thirty one thirty. We're seek to
(11:28):
three forty seven go around CIM.
Speaker 5 (11:30):
In Game three thousand and five, I think had to go.
Speaker 1 (11:34):
Around three thousand Street fifty three forty seven black Deck three.
Can you return the bation some black dectory directly.
Speaker 5 (11:42):
To glieve I need your land? I need your land
to media to day, I can go.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
To dollars fifty minus couple seven to CB West Downtown
back dollars down one two zero bow one mark the
one black Jack three. Does it give you any idea
of what they're talking about? Can you clue me in here, colonel?
Speaker 3 (12:00):
There's two possibilities.
Speaker 8 (12:01):
One discussion I had earlier today is that the black
Hawk transponder may not have been working. If the Blackhawks
transponder wasn't working, they would have been told to go
back to base most likely to fix that. I don't
know if they were talking to the black Hawk or not.
They haven't released a call sign of the black Hawk.
As far as I could tell, it sounds like to
me when I listened to that, I think they were
(12:23):
talking to a different aircraft, not the Blackhawk, and that
would be logical to me. We've heard about the overstress
of those air traffic controllers and what happens in a
case like this, whether it's the pilot's fault, whether it
is the air traffic controller's fault. It's task saturation.
Speaker 1 (12:41):
You know. One of the things that I've always seen
in every tragedy this holds true. It's usually a series
of events. It's not just the pilot did one thing wrong.
It's a series of events that lead up to the tragedy.
I have a feeling we're going to end up seeing
something like that play out here, Colonel.
Speaker 3 (12:57):
I think we will. I think it's going to be
a combination.
Speaker 8 (13:01):
If you're flying in the air, traffic controllers a little
bit late on their discussions, on their calls, then you're
going to execute the best way you can.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
And like I say, I'm not saying that happen right now,
but I think we're going to see that it has
some impact there.
Speaker 1 (13:14):
Yeah, clon, I'll tell you what. It's great talking to you,
and I reiterate the same thing you said. I hate
that it's under these circumstances, but I appreciate your service
in the United States Marine Corps, my favorite branch of
the military. By the way, my grandfather was a Marine,
and I hope I get to talk to you again
soon under better circumstances. But we appreciate your insight on
all of this.
Speaker 8 (13:34):
Yeah, CIRTA in the Marine Corps is also my favorite
branch of the service as well, and the best of.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
Course as well. It should be colonel as well. It
should be all right, folks, you know, all of us
are praying for the victims, the victims families and all
of this. It's just a horrific tragedy. But you've got
to ask, now, what about the air traffic controls role
in all of this. We've now learned that air traffic
control that Reagan Airport is down to nineteen air traffic
(14:00):
the controllers. They should have a staff of thirty. We
do know that Joe Biden put in place all kinds
of diversity, equity and inclusion programs policies that limited the
ability to hire very good air traffic controllers. President Trump
was not shy about pointing this out today.
Speaker 9 (14:19):
The FAA's diversity push includes focus on hiring people with
severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
That is amazing.
Speaker 9 (14:31):
And then it says FAA says people with severe disabilities
the most underrepresented segment of the workforce, and they want
them in, and they want them they can be air
traffic controllers.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
I don't think so, you know, to all my loyal
Stinchfield's Army members. You remember, on this program, we talked
about that exact directive and we gave the exact quote
about severe psychiatric problems you want as an air traffic controller.
The lunacy behind making a decision like that. Well, as
(15:04):
you can imagine, all of this seems to be playing out.
The media doesn't like President Trump's talking about it, but
he doesn't care. He's a bold leader and he's trying
to fix the problem. He grew up within the FAA.
Speaker 9 (15:17):
Another story determined that the workforce was too white, that
they had concerted efforts to get the administration to change that,
and to change it immediately. This was in the Obama administration,
just prior to my getting there.
Speaker 1 (15:36):
Again, I want to be very clear here, we don't
know if this was an air traffic control problem, if
it was a pilot problem, if it was both. But
when you get to the root of all of this,
do you care whether the air traffic controller is white
or black? I don't. I just want the best air
traffic controller. Well, the media went totally nuts over President
(15:58):
Trump's comments on diversity, equity an inclusion. Caitlin Collins, you
know her, She's a doozy boy over there at NBC.
She was in the White House Press briefing room as
President Trump was giving his assessment of all of this,
and she came at him like this, and it didn't
end well for her.
Speaker 10 (16:16):
Mignette, know the names of the sixty seven people who
were killed, and you are blaming Democrats and DEI policies
and air traffic control and seemingly the member of the
US military.
Speaker 3 (16:26):
Who was flying that black Hawk helicopter.
Speaker 5 (16:27):
Don't you think you're getting ahead of the investigation right now?
Speaker 3 (16:30):
I don't think so at all.
Speaker 11 (16:31):
I don't think we're the names of the people.
Speaker 3 (16:33):
You mean, the names of the people that are on
the plane.
Speaker 11 (16:37):
You think that's going to make a difference.
Speaker 5 (16:38):
They are for their family, They are a group of people.
Speaker 11 (16:40):
That have lost their lives. If you want a list
of the names, we can give you that. We'll be
giving that very soon with in coordination with American Airlines.
We're in coordination very strongly, obviously with the military. But
I think that's not a very smart question. I'm surprised
coming from you, not.
Speaker 1 (16:58):
A very smart question. That is. Caitlin Collins, one of
my least favorite at the mainstream media. So we are
just learning now that it's being reported that the cop
pilot of the Blackhawk helicopter was a female pilot with
five hundred hours. Not making any judgment on that, only
giving you information, so we continue to assess the situation. There.
(17:18):
Joining me now the managing editor over at NewsBusters at
the Media Research Center, our friend Curtis how Is back
with us. Curtis, welcome to the program.
Speaker 5 (17:27):
Always a pleasure grant, but yeah, this one's a tough one.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
It is, and I want to thank you, Curtis. I'm
going to tell you did such a great job of
putting information out there, not just negative about the media.
You had very informative stuff Early on. I was following
your Twitter feed. I urge everyone to follow you on Twitter.
It was very very helpful. So thank you for that.
But I want to ask you specifically about the media
and their reaction. They're going nuts over this diversity, equity
(17:54):
and inclusion claimed by President Trump and then trying to
make it out like it's the worst thing that ever had. Yeah.
Speaker 12 (18:01):
What's interesting is President Trump is just kind of doing
what you were doing at your monologue. He was raising
a whole bunch of different possibilities. He wasn't specifically suggesting
one over the other was going to prevail as the
reason why. You know, and I don't really see entirely
what the problem is.
Speaker 5 (18:22):
I personally, my style of things, I wouldn't, but this is.
Speaker 12 (18:25):
Who President Trump is and he's elevating this issue of diversity, equity,
and inclusion. And these are real things that have been
going on in this government. And even if you want
to take out DEI, just from a pure staffing levels
issue that you mentioned a few minutes ago, what was
going what has been going on not just at Reagan National,
but airports across the country and air traffic controller shortage
as more people roll off because there's mandatory retirement ages.
(18:49):
Just like you see with pilots, there's also a pilot shortage.
Mayor Pete in his you know, fun four years, including
a very long paternity leave during a supply chains didn't
solve any of those things. So now it's on President
Trump and Secretary Duffy to fix these issues.
Speaker 5 (19:06):
I would say, though Grant last night, the media should.
Speaker 12 (19:09):
Focus on their own house first and cleaning that up,
considering a lot of them were claiming passing along a
headline that said, Trump guts key Aviation Safety Committee fireusheads
of TSA and Coastguard, suggesting that somehow Trump gutted aviation
safety and within a week we had this deadly plane crash. No,
the Safety Committee makes recommendations regarding TSA airport check in
(19:34):
nothing to do with your one's ability to fly the plane.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Yeah, it's amazing to me that they'll read at someplace
and others run with it. They don't even fact check
for themselves. Let me play early on. This is CNN
blaming President Trump for the crash for my producers. This
is number thirteen to play for me. It's really quite
stunning that you know, they're blame and President Trump for
(19:57):
blaming DEI. Early on, they're blaming President Trump even earlier
than he came out blaming DEI. Listen to this.
Speaker 13 (20:03):
That hour of anguish the President started talking about just
instantaneously turned into a period of blame. Blaming former Secretary
of Transportation Pete Buddha Jedge, blaming former President Barack Obama,
blaming former President Joe Biden. The buck clearly does not
stop with this president. The blame begins with him. Well,
(20:25):
the blame begins with him.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
There was another clip I remember from earlier, was very
early on in the crash from CNN, and they were
going on and on about how this was President Trump's
fault and he's just taken over. So this is par
for the course with them, isn't it. Curtis Yeah.
Speaker 12 (20:41):
Abby Phillip, host of CNN Newsnight CNN Thunderdome, was making
this claim talking about how we don't have this person
and there's no this person, you know, because all these
people resigned ahead of President Trump's inauguration. I mean, if
the safety was so important, these people could have stayed
instead of offered their resignations before he came on, doing sure.
Speaker 5 (21:00):
A smooth transition. And also I think the media sometimes.
Speaker 12 (21:03):
Put too much importance in like the top job in
some of these agencies where there's thousands of people and
it's very kind of orderly operation in terms of, you know,
the process and so too. I think that's the issue.
But they called it on Hinge, they called it unpresidential.
Their aviation correspondent sent after President Trump's remarks that he
(21:24):
had somehow made life for the families hellish.
Speaker 6 (21:27):
He had no evidence to make that claim.
Speaker 5 (21:29):
Of course, he went full Jim Acosta.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Yeah, look, the families are going to want answers, just
like President Trump and all of us do. I'll play
one more for you before I let you go. This
is Peter Alexander suggesting exactly what you were talking about earlier.
Watch this.
Speaker 14 (21:45):
So among the questions that we're not asked right now
is whether his effort, as you know, the administration recently
sent a letter to all federal workers basically offering them
an opportunity to quate or.
Speaker 1 (21:55):
Resign and to receive some form of a payout to.
Speaker 14 (21:59):
Depart working for the administration, if he had any concerns
that that effort may deplete the administration, including the FAA
their air traffic control community, of some of the veterans
who have the expertise that is needed to serve in
those control towers around the country.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
These people are so dumb, Curtis, that letter went out
this week. How in the world are people going to
be leaving their jobs already? That's not happening.
Speaker 12 (22:27):
Yeah, a Kendall reporter there from NBC doesn't understand the
fact that these air traffic controllers like that is not
a work from home job, and that's part of the
buyout fit process, the buyout offer that President Trump has
put out to federal employees. Michael Stranger tried to do
this with Caroline Levitt yesterday. He was saying, like, well,
what about all the doctors that are going to leave
(22:48):
government service, And She's like, well, doctors work in hospital,
so they kind of actually do need to show up.
Speaker 15 (22:54):
So I don't really.
Speaker 5 (22:55):
Quite know how that works.
Speaker 12 (22:56):
They never have to feel, the fact checkers grant, they
never have to feel the consequences of their own actions
when it comes to accountability. It is one profession that
can continually get things wrong and they don't suffer the
consequences in terms of their bottom line or their performance
or their employment unless it comes to corporate layoffs.
Speaker 1 (23:14):
Such a good point. Curtis how real quick give your
Twitter handle x x handle because you're doing great work
over there.
Speaker 12 (23:22):
All one word, Curtis how houc K and I'm Curtis
with a C.
Speaker 1 (23:28):
All right, man, man, thank you for coming on. I
appreciate the work you do at NewsBusters as well. We
appreciate you. Same to you, my friend. Absolutely, we'll see
you soon. We'll continue to follow the story because I
think it's gonna be a long time before we get
some real, real answers in all of this. Hey, folks,
you need to learn about energized health and innercellular hydration,
supercharge your energy, boost your immune system, and dramatically increase
(23:50):
your brain function, look and feel years younger, all through
a simple and natural process. Don't believe me. Go to
energizedhealth dot com and check out the hundreds of amazing testimonials.
Energized Health offers one hundred percent money back guarantee. They're
A plus rated and have held thousands over twenty years.
I lost fifteen pounds in two weeks with energized Health
(24:10):
and I've kept it off. Now what five six months later,
still feeling great? This system works. Energizedhealth dot com. While
you're there, check out their free masterclass that's energizedhealth dot com.
And you make sure you tell them Grant Stinchfield sent
you all right, Cashpattel, our buddy here face the DC
mob in his hearing today to be the next FBI director.
(24:31):
How do you do you can guess? Next? Welcome back everyone,
So our buddy, Cashpateel, who's on this program so often,
face the music today finally in front of a Senate
(24:53):
committee and He did fabulous, just as I expected him
to do well. The Democrats came out swinging. Of course,
they kept focusing on ret atribution and does he have
an enemy's list. I'm not even gonna go there for
him because it was such ridiculous questioning, But I will
tell you they wanted to hear about January sixth. Okay,
they focused in on January sixth. Of course they did well.
Ted Cruz helped Cash Pattel out a little bit by
(25:15):
leading the questioning in this direction.
Speaker 16 (25:18):
How many times did Dodo approach Capitol police and ask
if they needed National Guard assistants?
Speaker 9 (25:25):
I believe those letters are well documented, numerous instances, and
numerous of those instances, those requests were shut down.
Speaker 16 (25:35):
Now my correct, at the Capitol sergeant at arms set
assistance was unnecessary, That's correct, Senator. Who did the sergeant
at arms report to the Speaker of the House That
would have been Nancy Pelosi at the time.
Speaker 1 (25:47):
Is that correct? But yes, Senator, this is why they
don't want Cashptel to be the FBI director. See Cash
Hotel already knows all the evildoers, all the players. He
was the one who exposed the Russian collusion. Hoax. He
knows the inside game in Washington, and he knows the
players responsible, including this guy asking the questions. Adam Schiff,
(26:11):
the new senator from California. I hate even just saying
that he's a senator, but he is. He tried to
play a little game with Cash, and Cash wasn't having it.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
Turn around.
Speaker 5 (26:22):
I'm looking at you.
Speaker 10 (26:22):
You're talking about to look at them. I want you
to look at them if you can, if you have
the court, to look them in the eye, mister Bottel,
and tell them you're proud of what you did. Tell
them you're proud that you raised money off of people
that assaulted their colleagues, that pepper sprayed them, that beat
them with poles.
Speaker 1 (26:40):
Tell them you're proud of what you did.
Speaker 10 (26:42):
Mister Mittel. They're right there, they're guarding you today. Tell
them how proud you are.
Speaker 5 (26:46):
That's an abject line, you know it.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
I love Cash Mittel. He was asking him a turnaround
and look at the Capitol police officers, and he said,
I'm looking at you. That's the kind of leadership we need,
not going to back down to the bullying of a
pencil neck. And one more for you, Mazie Herono the
dope of the Senate. She doesn't disappoint again.
Speaker 5 (27:08):
Here your answer yes or no?
Speaker 1 (27:09):
Did you make money?
Speaker 5 (27:11):
I don't have those last time I'm going.
Speaker 1 (27:13):
To ask you that question. You have that information, so
you refuse to answer the question. I answered thirteen hundred pages.
You are.
Speaker 5 (27:23):
No answer, and yet you spread dangerous misinformation.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
She's unble louse. She has thirteen hundred pages and answer
all of her questions. Of course. Well, joining me now,
former FBI special agent and former Navy seal Jonathan Gilliam
is with us. Jonathan is good to see you, welcome.
What did you make of cash his performance today?
Speaker 7 (27:46):
It's good to be with you again, Grant. I think
Cash did great. He just doesn't take any of their nonsense.
For me though, watching these things, it's it's just, first
of all, these hearings are worth Let's say Cash Fatael
was a bad guy. They never get to the bottom
of who these people are. It's just grandstanding and narrative
(28:09):
pushing so they can get headlines, and so the media
can push these headlines out right, so that first off,
they're a failure in actually finding out who these people
are that are going to be serving these important positions,
and secondly, it displays the incompetence and almost dei type
(28:29):
of people that serve in our Senate often in the
House of Representatives. It's very disturbing for me to watch
this stuff, especially when they're just going off of a narrative.
They can't even dig into somebody's background. They have to
go off a narrative, and it just comes off being
(28:51):
absolutely ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
So, you know, Tulci Gabbard also was having her hearing
today to the DNI, and this was her opening statement. Again,
she's a former Democrat. She's now saying, you know what,
She's embraced the MAGA movement. And I've talked to her
at length about this, and I've given her great leeway
on this. I believe that she is sincere. Now it
(29:13):
didn't always I do. Now this is her opening statement,
and it shows you who she is.
Speaker 2 (29:18):
Really accusing me of being Trump's puppet, Putin's puppet, Assad's puppet,
a Guru's puppet, Mody's puppet, not recognizing the absurdity of
simultaneously being the puppet of five different puppet masters. The
same tactic was used against President Trump and failed. The
(29:39):
American people elected President Trump with a decisive victory and
mandate for change. The fact is what truly unsettles my
political opponents is I refuse to be their puppet.
Speaker 1 (29:54):
Why do the Democrats hate her so much is because
she switched parties.
Speaker 7 (30:00):
I don't think they ever really liked her. Grant and
I share your feelings with Tulsi. Although I don't trust her,
I'm going to be honest with you. She's the one
pick that I do not trust. However, it is interesting
to hear her say these things because I don't think
that many of the Democrats. She was at the top
of the heap. She was a vice chair of the DNC.
But when we talk about the Democrat power hitters, they
(30:22):
don't like people like Tulsi because one she's attractive and
two she's smart, and they don't like that. Because see Tulsi,
one thing I will give her is she's served in
a real unit in the military.
Speaker 3 (30:37):
In the Army.
Speaker 7 (30:38):
Well, these people that you just saw in the Senate hearing,
and many of the leftist representatives and even the Rhinos,
they've never done anything in their life. They just went
from college to representing and maybe they were an advisor
somewhere these silver bullets that they ride, and they.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Hate people like Tulsi.
Speaker 7 (30:56):
Even though she was speaking their language, they still feel
threat her because they'll never truly be experts. And people
who are compulsive, narcissistic liars hate people with real experience.
And I think that's been Tulsi's Achilles hill the whole
time she's been in politics.
Speaker 1 (31:14):
Yeah, I think you're right, great assessment. As always, Jonathan gilliam.
I appreciate your services country and coming on the program.
Thank you. You got agree absolutely, and it'sco scene as
well too. All right, folks, listen, an underreported story about
an American service member killed in Gaza. We have that mystery.
It continues next. Wait till you hear this. This is
(31:35):
one the mainstream media is not talking about. Welcome back everyone,
Now to a story that should get your attention. Do
you remember back in May we had three members of
(31:56):
our military that were injured while building at aid peer
in Gaza. Remember this peer that Biden had ain't sure
We had to get food into Gaza, and we built
this giant peer to the tune of three hundred and
twenty million dollars. Well, we're now learning that one of
the soldiers had died. He died in October, but the
(32:19):
secrecy surrounding his death, the military would not reveal it.
They would not really reveal how they were even injured.
The entire thing was a secret. That man you're looking
at on your screen as a man who died at
Sergeant Quandarius stan Lee, who was twenty three years old.
Remember Joe Biden said there'd be no boots on the ground.
Here's a little trip down memory lane talking about how
(32:42):
they would build this peer. This is Joe Biden tonight.
Speaker 17 (32:47):
I'm directing the US military to lead an emergency mission
to establish a temporary peer in the Mediterranean on the
coast of Gaza. They can receive large shipments carrying food, water,
medicine the temporary Sheldon.
Speaker 15 (33:01):
No US boots will be on the ground.
Speaker 17 (33:04):
A temporary peer will enable a massive increase demount of
meditarian assistance getting into Gauze every day.
Speaker 1 (33:12):
Well, again, it's just another one of Joe Biden's lies. Clearly,
if the military is helping build it, you got to
have boots on the ground, and now we have a
dead soldier because of it. Well, joining me now is
someone who's trying to uncover the truth about what happened
to Kwandarius Stanley, former Green Beret host of Speak the
Truth podcast. Our new friend Matt Tardio is back with us. Matt,
(33:33):
it is good to see you again. Explain to me
what's going on here with Sergeant Stanley's death.
Speaker 15 (33:40):
I mean, honestly, it's pretty simple.
Speaker 18 (33:42):
When the Humanitarian Aid Peer was being constructed, we look
back over time, there was originally videos. You know, the
US Army, believe it or not, was actually responsible for
building this sucker. Army actually has more boats than the Navy,
believe it or not, and they're a lot smaller. But regardless,
the US Army hasn't and they were loading off the
coast of Israel while they.
Speaker 15 (34:02):
Were constructing this Humanitarian Aid Peer.
Speaker 18 (34:04):
After they finished building it, it got put together and
it got towed into shore, and then we ended up
having contractors essentially that were over there at the Peer Guardian.
We gave them a little bit of special equipment to
make sure that the sucker didn't get blown up.
Speaker 15 (34:15):
Now, after it got anchored right, it.
Speaker 18 (34:18):
Was in operation for about a total of three days.
Because of the winds and the waves and everything else
that you're seeing over there, that's actually a video, the
one that you have up on the screen of After
it got anchored down, those waves came in and busted
it apart and it started floating up to the north
over where the Portobash dods at, which is about twenty
six twenty seven miles to the north of where they
anchored it over inside Gaza. So we had a perfectly
(34:40):
good pier or ports excuse me, actual functioning port delivering
nation's worth of supplies twenty six miles to the north
where the government decided to spend three hundred and twenty
six million dollars on it. Now, as that was being
built all the way back in April May time frame
when we saw it actually getting built, Hamas was firing
rockets at the US members that were floating off in
(35:01):
the ocean, and what we ended up seeing was some
of those rockets splashing down in and around.
Speaker 15 (35:05):
They weren't very accurate.
Speaker 18 (35:06):
You got a lot of homemade rockets that come out
of there, but they end up splashing it out there.
Speaker 1 (35:10):
Well.
Speaker 18 (35:10):
One of those days, and we don't really know what happens,
a construction accident, maybe one of these soldiers ends up
getting injured. Turns out it's Quandarius Stanley. He ends up
dying in about a week before he dies, he actually
gets like they I don't want to say they kick
him out of the military, but they ets and they
boot him from the military about a week before he dies.
(35:31):
The Army doesn't announce his death because that would look
really really bad on the Abiden administration. They said we
were going to have boots on the ground, and I
don't believe we did have US service members on the ground.
But what we did have was that Humanitarian Aid Peer
bust apart. We had three service members total that got injured.
One of them later ends up dying. The government like
kicks him out the military before he dies, about a
(35:53):
week two weeks before he dies, the Humanitarian Aid Peer
gets floated up the shore. They end up grabbing it
and pulling it back. But Grant, you want to hear
the craziest about this entire thing, Like the craziest, Yeah,
I think you do. Back in June, it was June
twenty first, June twenty first. This last year, twenty twenty four,
UN Famine Review Committee ends up filing a report about
(36:15):
the level of hunger that was taking place inside Gaza
and they conducted this review in May, and do you
know what they found. They ended up finding at the time,
and I'm gonna go quote no evidence of famine.
Speaker 1 (36:27):
None.
Speaker 15 (36:28):
And that's during major operations.
Speaker 18 (36:30):
That were taking place down inside of Rafa, which, by
the way, the Biden administration decided to hold up weapons
shipments to Israel, where we very well probably had US
hostages being held down in Rafa. We know we had
a US hostage that was killed in Rafa in a
freaking tunnel.
Speaker 1 (36:49):
So you just saw the UN report there that says
there's no famine, which means you don't need an AID peer.
But even if you need, there's the report. But even
if you need an AID peer, as you pull out
just a few miles to the north, there is a
massive port in Israel that right there on your screen.
There's a massive port in Israel that literally you could
(37:12):
bring all the aid you need it and you'd never
have to put a member of our military in danger,
Which now gets me to the question, we had him
in danger, they get injured, and they kick him out
of the military. How does this remain so quiet? And
how did you realize this guy was now dead?
Speaker 18 (37:31):
The Military Times dropped an article, and when I saw
Military Times that dropped the article, I was like, you know,
where did Military Times get this?
Speaker 15 (37:37):
Information?
Speaker 18 (37:38):
Ends up coming from his obituary. That's how we figured
it out. His family published his obituary on the line.
It wasn't an announcement by the military nothing.
Speaker 15 (37:47):
It's sad.
Speaker 18 (37:48):
It's literally using US service members as pawns for what
for people that weren't hungry to get them three days
worth of food.
Speaker 1 (37:57):
That's preposterous, asolutely ridiculous.
Speaker 15 (38:01):
It's a like and.
Speaker 1 (38:04):
This, of course is all under the Biden administration. I
expect things to change drastically under the Trump administration, but
I would also like them to investigate the Trump administration
the circumstances surrounding uh Gundarius Stanley. Because you're telling me
he's kicked out. You say, ets, what does that mean
when you say kicked out of it?
Speaker 15 (38:25):
He gets his paperwork, he's out of the military.
Speaker 18 (38:27):
They probably did what we call like a med board
or a medical evaluation board, where they say, look this guy,
he's beyond like repair. He's not going to be able
to get back in. But I mean, the man's on
his deathbed. This is like the equivalent of taking somebody
that gets wounded in Afghanistan or Iraq back when we
were at war and waiting like and again we're not
talking about like a year, two years, three years down
(38:48):
the road. We're talking about literally about a week before
his death, right week to two weeks before.
Speaker 15 (38:53):
Question for you they end up mount Is.
Speaker 1 (38:56):
There any plans to give this man and you know,
a purple heart you die in combat? I mean, you
give him some medals for what he did and all
of these things. Is there any any kind of accommodations
going to him?
Speaker 18 (39:14):
Not that I'm aware of, Not that I'm aware of,
And I'm not even sure that he died in combat
because they have been so hushed about it.
Speaker 15 (39:20):
They just don't want anybody to know.
Speaker 18 (39:22):
I mean, they had We lost three service members back
in I think it was January of last year, so
about a year has passed now. Three service members ended
up dying in Jordan that barely even made like the news.
Barely three US service members end up getting killed in Jordan,
and that's after the two Navy seals. This entire situation
over in the Middle East with Israel was just It's
(39:44):
like it was handled by people that wanted to drag
it out and the sad part it's just not Quandarius Stanley.
We also had the US hostages over inside Gaza, one
of which ended up getting murdered inside of a tunnel
in Rafa, and that particular town happens to be where
they're like. One of these US hostages was found murdered
Byjamas after the Biden administration pretty much halted Israel from
(40:06):
going in there by halting their weapon shipments.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
Yeah, that really is. It's stunning. I'm grateful for the
research that you're doing on so many topics. Former Green
Beret Matt Tardio. Tell them again where your podcast is
and where they can find you.
Speaker 18 (40:22):
Find me on pretty much any audio download platform to use,
Apple Podcasts, whatever. You can also find the video version
of it on YouTube at Speak the Truth Podcast.
Speaker 1 (40:31):
All right, Matt, it's good to see you. Thank you,
and keep us posted on this story and others as well.
All right, up next, we'll get more into RFK Junior's
hearings with the great Doctor Peter McCollum is with us.
(40:55):
You know, it takes a lot of money from Big Pharma.
Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders just so happens to two
that were really hammering RFK Junior about whether or not
he'd take money from big farmer. Have they not been
watching this guy. Here's RFK work twenty twenty.
Speaker 5 (41:10):
In twenty twenty, you were the single largest.
Speaker 6 (41:13):
Because of my receiver moneations from workers all over this country.
Speaker 1 (41:19):
Workers. You were this not a nickel from corporate You was.
Speaker 18 (41:23):
The single largest acceptor harmaceutical dollars from workers in five million.
Speaker 1 (41:31):
Nothing like turning the tables on your questioner. Joining me now,
world renowned cardiologist, epidemiologist and chief scientific officer at the
Wellness Company, Doctor Peter McCullough is with us. Doc is
good to see you, Good to see you. All right.
Your assessment of Robert F. Kennedy Junior, I know you
know him. It was, you know, some of these interchanges
(41:54):
were comical almost.
Speaker 19 (41:57):
It was self interest, conflict of interest, big food, big
pharma on display.
Speaker 5 (42:05):
It couldn't be more apparent.
Speaker 19 (42:07):
Bernie Sanders trying to say it's the big pharmaceutical workers. Well, yeah,
they're the ones who influenced him, the same thing with
Elizabeth Warren and they're pounding RFK. That one I thought
that was so obvious was Elizabeth Warren, who takes money
from pharmaceutical companies. She was trying to get RFK to
(42:30):
promise that he wasn't going to go after pharmaceutical companies.
I mean they probably told her, you know, in the
days beforehand they gave the pharmaceutical Agency, companies gave these
senators their marching orders.
Speaker 5 (42:45):
They were creating talking points for themselves. They were not
examining Kennedy.
Speaker 1 (42:50):
No, they sure weren't a lot of news happening on
the health front. We've got RFK Junior's confirmation, and then
we've got President Trump signing this order to be taking
the United States out of the World Health Organization and
those finding a thirty seven million dollar payment was supposed
to go to WHO. After President Trump had signed this order.
(43:10):
What do you make of all of this in the
United States saying enough is enough with WHO?
Speaker 19 (43:15):
You know, Trump responded to not only sentiment here in America,
but all over the world. You know, last summer at
the World Health Assembly, which is their big meeting, there
were global protests, including those right there in Geneva, but
all over the world. The entire world wants to pull
out of the WHO, because the WHO is a sinkhole.
Speaker 5 (43:37):
For money, draining the world's resources. It's a bum off.
Speaker 19 (43:41):
And it had international health regulations and Pandemic Treaty Alliance
that was trying to take global control of healthcare. So
you know the who wrote Trump back and said, boy,
we're sorry to see you go.
Speaker 5 (43:54):
You've been in since nineteen forty eight.
Speaker 19 (43:57):
We've been trying to improve our transparency and cost effectiveness
for seven years. And what I told Laura Ingram is,
you know, Trump just gave them a twenty percent budget cut.
Speaker 5 (44:08):
They're going to have to get efficient quick. Good riddance.
Speaker 1 (44:12):
Yeah, good Riddens is right on this issue of gain
of function research. I'm somewhat torn. I know the dangers
of it certainly, and I know the lab leak or
deliberate leak from China and that Wuhan lab caused such
problems here in the United States. I worry if we
stop gain of function, our enemies continue it. We're not
on an equal playing field. Is there a way you
(44:34):
can set my mind at EASi or do I have
legitimate concerns here?
Speaker 19 (44:38):
You know, there is research called pathogens of pandemic potential
of dual purpose, that is, pathogens that can create the
problem and then the research to actually be able to
defend against it, what's called the countermeasures.
Speaker 5 (44:54):
What we need is we need control over this grant.
Speaker 19 (44:57):
There's thirteen BSL level four, which is the highest risk,
that's like will Han China. We have thirteen of those
in the United States, and we have one hundred and
forty eight BSL threes.
Speaker 5 (45:09):
That's a lot. There's really no inventory of who's doing what.
And just to stop the.
Speaker 19 (45:16):
Federal funding for the research doesn't mean the Chinese can't
come in and fund these labs, which they were funding
one in California or the Gates Foundation. So I think
we need an overhaul of our plan regarding this whole
endeavor of research, a temporary moratorium and then having the
government really take control, tight control in our highest.
Speaker 5 (45:38):
Biosecurity labs possible.
Speaker 1 (45:40):
And I would say not having government officials that are
in bed with the laboratories and the private companies that
are running this running these studies, because then you're not
getting any oversight. Everybody's just lying in their pockets with
the grant money, and that causes a huge problem. Real quick,
before I let you go, I know I've showed you
this before, but this is the new feet old kit
from the Wellness Company. I think it's the coolest thing,
(46:03):
going real quick in about thirty seconds.
Speaker 19 (46:05):
Doc, the best pitch for this field Kit grant is
for you and the preppers, people who want everything.
Speaker 5 (46:12):
They're ready to survive the next catstite. Get a field kit.
Speaker 1 (46:17):
I love it. Lots of medications and you're going to
keep you safe and could save your life. Actually, Doctor
Peter mccull it's great having you on. Thank you, Thank you.
Absolutely hey. Here's how you get the field kit and
ten percent off if you want it TWC Dot Health
Forward Slash Voice, use the promo code voice as I said,
to save ten percent again TWC Dot Health Forward Slash Voice.
(46:40):
Or you can just get one of these two. And
this is what I started with. This is the other
regular kit TWC Dot Health Forward Slash Voice. All right,
Chicago Mayor Johnson spouting off again against trumpet and that's next. Well,
(47:03):
here's my parting gift to you, Mayor Johnson of Chicago
spouting off about President Trump.
Speaker 20 (47:10):
That White House is being ran in one of the
most raggedy forms of government that I've ever seen. If
anybody is questioning whether or not what our country will
look like having Confederacy won.
Speaker 3 (47:22):
There should be no question. Now they want us to
be afraid. Do not be afraid, Chicago.
Speaker 1 (47:33):
Raggedy form of government. Chicago is about as raggedy as
it gets. Do not be afraid, Chicagans. You got murderers
and gang members around every corner, and you can't protect
yourself because the liberals are taking your guns away. Stint shields,
army rolls. Folks. We'll see you tomorrow, seven pm Eastern Time.
Welcome to the program, folks. We have lots of questions
about how this horrific crash could happen as a American
Airlines flight is trying to land at Reagan International Airport
in Washington, DC, when a black Hawk helicopter basically out
of nowhere comes in and smashes into the plane, killing
(00:40):
nearly seventy people. Now, so who is to blame for this?
That's one of the questions we need to be asking.
How does it happen in this day and age, As
you see the video here, how in the world does
something like this happen? And we are learning tonight that
the air traffic control center there was quote understaffed, that
one air traffic control roller was doing the job of
(01:01):
two people that night. And this is right before the collision.
This is air traffic control trying to raise the black
Hawk helicopter.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Thanks your body insight.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
Some of the aircraft?
Speaker 1 (01:27):
All right, no response from the Blackhawk. Do you have
the plane in sight? The air traffic controller is asking,
and they get no response. Now, we went through and
we started looking at some of the very strange, erratic
movements of this helicopter. When you look at how this
helicopter flew and the plane there you see is the
(01:48):
helicopter makes some zigzag turns as it's coming down the
Potomac River, and then right before crashing into almost looked
like turning into this American Eagle flight landing there. So
you've got the erratic movements of this helicopter. Then I
found the elevation data for the Blackhawk helicopter. When it
(02:09):
took off, it started about eleven hundred feet, slowly descending
to about eight hundred feet, then to seven hundred feet.
Then right before the crash, about thirty seconds, the elevation
swiftly drops from seven hundred feet to four hundred feet.
And we know the crash took place at two hundred
and fifty feet, So why the sudden drop in elevation.
(02:33):
This is a serious issue now as we try to
place blame and figure out who is to blame. Of
course for all of this. This is Pete haigset, the
new Secretary of Defense, talking about the elevation issues.
Speaker 4 (02:45):
Military does dangerous things, it does routine things on the
regular basis. Tragically, last night a mistake was made. I
think the President is right. There was some sort of
an elevation.
Speaker 5 (02:56):
Issue that we have immediately begun investigating.
Speaker 1 (02:59):
At the DoD and Army level. We'll make one thing
very clear. Blackhawk helicopters fly up and down the Potomac
River very very regularly. These pilots and apparently the pilot
that was flying the black Hawk was a very seasoned pilot,
not new to this type of environment. Wearing night vision goggles.
That could pose an issue, But I'm not buying the
(03:19):
vision issues. These pilots fly this flight all the time.
This idea that the planes lights blended in with the
city lights, I just don't see it. So I look
at the erratic flight path, I look at the no
answer by the plane. I look at the fact that
a reasonable person would suspect there's a possibility this could
(03:43):
have been deliberate when you look at the video of
the helicopter literally smashing into the plane. And then, of
course we may never know the answers because we have
this problem. According to Lieutenant Colonel galb on Fox News.
Speaker 6 (03:57):
Now have a Blackhawk, this particular model of the Blackhawk
does not have that capability. So you have to go
off of the evidence that you get from either eyewitnesses,
radar tracks, and ATC recordings. Voice recordings, you're not going
to get a black off the Blackhawk that will help
you in that regard. So there's a chance that there's
(04:18):
very little on recording that will truly help this.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
So there is no voice recorder inside the Blackhawk helicopter.
There's no collision avoidance system like there is inside commercial
airliners inside a Blackhawk. That wouldn't make any sense. You
figure these Blackhawks are in battle, flying six seven eight
helicopters side by side. The collision avoidance would be going
off all the time. But the voice recorder, I maybe
(04:43):
can see in combat you can't have one in case,
god forbid, they fell into the hands of the enemy.
But flying missions in the United States, they ought to
have voice recorders. So what could have happened here? I'm
not pushing conspiracy theories. I'm only going to give you
a list of how I see it, of the things
investigators need to be looking at. Could have this been
(05:07):
pilot error or a deliberate act, or even terror on
behalf of the pilot. We have seen inside our own
military that they have engaged sometimes in terror style actions.
It has to be investigated. Not saying it's true, but
it has to be investigated. There's a human error factor
in all of this. Was there a mechanical issue? Was
(05:28):
the pilot working to try to keep the helicopter slow
and steady while dealing with mechanical issue? Is that why
he couldn't have responded? Then of course you've got to
wonder was there an air traffic control issue? And I
will tell you this, you can't rule out the possibility
(05:50):
of a computer hack. We've talked about the ability of
China to take over large yachts and even private jets.
We know this has proven to be true. We've had
sources inside the federal government that has said this is
to be true. And then I saw this news release
on the Lockheed Martin website. This is about a Blackhawk helicopter.
(06:11):
A matrix system it's called to can fly autonomously from
three hundred miles away. So if it has an autonomous
system on a Blackhawk, could the system somehow be hacked?
It is something you'd have to look at. This is
a promo video for that autonomous system by Lockheed Martin.
Speaker 7 (06:31):
There you're going to see the aircraft come up to
a stabilized hover and this is going to simulate testing
logistics operations.
Speaker 6 (06:41):
Where we would have a ground crew hooking up a
swing load to the aircraft.
Speaker 1 (06:45):
And this aircraft is called a position are partsully well,
it's fascinating technology. All of these are questions that need
to be answered. Every single aspect of this needs to
be investigated. And we'll get into air traffic control a
little bit later on in this program, but right now
(07:07):
I want to break down exactly what is going on
with the Blackhawk helicopter, and for that I want to
bring in now Marine Corps Colonel William Berner Dunn. He
is retired and welcome to the program. Colonel, it is
great to have you on the program.
Speaker 3 (07:29):
Hey, great, Hey, thanks for having me.
Speaker 8 (07:30):
I'm so we're getting together and meeting for the first
time on such a tragic event.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
It really is, and Colonel I'm glad you're on. You
flew attack helicopters when you look at this now. You
and I spoke this morning on my radio program. Have
you had any time over the last eight hours or
so to assess more of what possibly could have gone
down here?
Speaker 3 (07:55):
You know, I have. I watched the video, I've watched
it at length.
Speaker 8 (07:58):
I've listened to quite a bit of the commentary and
quite a bit of the air traffic control of what
they have And what I think we're going to find
out is the Blackhawk was probably looking at the wrong
aircraft when the ATC said see and avoid this jetliner.
(08:19):
I think they were looking at the one that was
taking off that you can see in some of the video,
and while they're focused on that, I think they lost
situational awareness and ended up in the flight path. No
matter what, they ended up in the flight path. So
we know that for a fact. The question is why
did they get into the flight path. As Secretary Heggsith
(08:40):
mentioned today, they've already started the mishap investigation, and I
think that's going to go a long way and help
it determine what actually happened. And one of the things
I want to bring out while.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
I can is is I have been pushing for over
two years now to.
Speaker 8 (08:55):
Get the Navy and the Marine Corps to put in
voice data recorders into all of our aircraft. And I
think in this instance, this show is exactly why I've
lost too many friends, and some of them we have
no idea why we lost them. They're just aircraft crashed
and we have no idea. I am a proponent of
putting them in, and I think that would help solve
(09:17):
these issues. And maybe what if shed light or will
shed light would have shed light into this particular incident.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
You know, I hate to be smirch the name of
any of these pilots because we don't know if there
was wrongdoing or not. You talk about some of the
crashes that your friends and colleagues have had over the
years that are still unknown. Does suicide cross your mind?
Is that a possibility? Will investigators look at that?
Speaker 3 (09:47):
I don't think so. They may look at it. You know,
I don't know how many.
Speaker 8 (09:52):
Pilots you know, but most pilots I know are very
very you know, we're all very self important, and that
is not a normal Although I have had some friends
commit suicide, that is not a normal concern that we have.
And I do not suspect that this aircrew purposely crashed
into this jet, all right.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
And that makes me feel better about things for sure,
though in this day and age. I'll tell you what,
everything that I've seen, what people out there watch have seen,
I just I don't rule out anything anymore. This idea
of night vision goggles, so apparently they were wearing them.
I've fooled around with night vision goggles. You turn the
lights on, it really causes quite an issue. Do they
(10:35):
help you in a city like Washington, d C. I
would think the night vision goggles could cause more of
a problem than help.
Speaker 8 (10:42):
Absolutely, I've got over a thousand hours of night vision
goggle time in the Cobra. They still will help you
see a jet airliner at night, but flying them and
flying with them in the city is difficult.
Speaker 3 (10:55):
Typically, what pilots do, and I will.
Speaker 8 (10:58):
Speak for myself, is they will lift up the goggles
so that what you're doing is you're looking under them,
and when you need to put them down.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
You can. Let me play a clip for you. This
is radio traffic. At first I thought they were talking
to the Blackhawk helicopter. Now I'm hearing they were talking
to a Coast Guard chopper. Maybe you could help me
decipher who air traffic Control is talking to when they're
talking about going back to base. Let's roll cut seven
zero three thousand America thirty one thirty. We're seek to
(11:28):
three forty seven go around CIM.
Speaker 5 (11:30):
In Game three thousand and five, I think had to go.
Speaker 1 (11:34):
Around three thousand Street fifty three forty seven black Deck three.
Can you return the bation some black dectory directly.
Speaker 5 (11:42):
To glieve I need your land? I need your land
to media to day, I can go.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
To dollars fifty minus couple seven to CB West Downtown
back dollars down one two zero bow one mark the
one black Jack three. Does it give you any idea
of what they're talking about? Can you clue me in here, colonel?
Speaker 3 (12:00):
There's two possibilities.
Speaker 8 (12:01):
One discussion I had earlier today is that the black
Hawk transponder may not have been working. If the Blackhawks
transponder wasn't working, they would have been told to go
back to base most likely to fix that. I don't
know if they were talking to the black Hawk or not.
They haven't released a call sign of the black Hawk.
As far as I could tell, it sounds like to
me when I listened to that, I think they were
(12:23):
talking to a different aircraft, not the Blackhawk, and that
would be logical to me. We've heard about the overstress
of those air traffic controllers and what happens in a
case like this, whether it's the pilot's fault, whether it
is the air traffic controller's fault. It's task saturation.
Speaker 1 (12:41):
You know. One of the things that I've always seen
in every tragedy this holds true. It's usually a series
of events. It's not just the pilot did one thing wrong.
It's a series of events that lead up to the tragedy.
I have a feeling we're going to end up seeing
something like that play out here, Colonel.
Speaker 3 (12:57):
I think we will. I think it's going to be
a combination.
Speaker 8 (13:01):
If you're flying in the air, traffic controllers a little
bit late on their discussions, on their calls, then you're
going to execute the best way you can.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
And like I say, I'm not saying that happen right now,
but I think we're going to see that it has
some impact there.
Speaker 1 (13:14):
Yeah, clon, I'll tell you what. It's great talking to you,
and I reiterate the same thing you said. I hate
that it's under these circumstances, but I appreciate your service
in the United States Marine Corps, my favorite branch of
the military. By the way, my grandfather was a Marine,
and I hope I get to talk to you again
soon under better circumstances. But we appreciate your insight on
all of this.
Speaker 8 (13:34):
Yeah, CIRTA in the Marine Corps is also my favorite
branch of the service as well, and the best of.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
Course as well. It should be colonel as well. It
should be all right, folks, you know, all of us
are praying for the victims, the victims families and all
of this. It's just a horrific tragedy. But you've got
to ask, now, what about the air traffic controls role
in all of this. We've now learned that air traffic
control that Reagan Airport is down to nineteen air traffic
(14:00):
the controllers. They should have a staff of thirty. We
do know that Joe Biden put in place all kinds
of diversity, equity and inclusion programs policies that limited the
ability to hire very good air traffic controllers. President Trump
was not shy about pointing this out today.
Speaker 9 (14:19):
The FAA's diversity push includes focus on hiring people with
severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
That is amazing.
Speaker 9 (14:31):
And then it says FAA says people with severe disabilities
the most underrepresented segment of the workforce, and they want
them in, and they want them they can be air
traffic controllers.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
I don't think so, you know, to all my loyal
Stinchfield's Army members. You remember, on this program, we talked
about that exact directive and we gave the exact quote
about severe psychiatric problems you want as an air traffic controller.
The lunacy behind making a decision like that. Well, as
(15:04):
you can imagine, all of this seems to be playing out.
The media doesn't like President Trump's talking about it, but
he doesn't care. He's a bold leader and he's trying
to fix the problem. He grew up within the FAA.
Speaker 9 (15:17):
Another story determined that the workforce was too white, that
they had concerted efforts to get the administration to change that,
and to change it immediately. This was in the Obama administration,
just prior to my getting there.
Speaker 1 (15:36):
Again, I want to be very clear here, we don't
know if this was an air traffic control problem, if
it was a pilot problem, if it was both. But
when you get to the root of all of this,
do you care whether the air traffic controller is white
or black? I don't. I just want the best air
traffic controller. Well, the media went totally nuts over President
(15:58):
Trump's comments on diversity, equity an inclusion. Caitlin Collins, you
know her, She's a doozy boy over there at NBC.
She was in the White House Press briefing room as
President Trump was giving his assessment of all of this,
and she came at him like this, and it didn't
end well for her.
Speaker 10 (16:16):
Mignette, know the names of the sixty seven people who
were killed, and you are blaming Democrats and DEI policies
and air traffic control and seemingly the member of the
US military.
Speaker 3 (16:26):
Who was flying that black Hawk helicopter.
Speaker 5 (16:27):
Don't you think you're getting ahead of the investigation right now?
Speaker 3 (16:30):
I don't think so at all.
Speaker 11 (16:31):
I don't think we're the names of the people.
Speaker 3 (16:33):
You mean, the names of the people that are on
the plane.
Speaker 11 (16:37):
You think that's going to make a difference.
Speaker 5 (16:38):
They are for their family, They are a group of people.
Speaker 11 (16:40):
That have lost their lives. If you want a list
of the names, we can give you that. We'll be
giving that very soon with in coordination with American Airlines.
We're in coordination very strongly, obviously with the military. But
I think that's not a very smart question. I'm surprised
coming from you, not.
Speaker 1 (16:58):
A very smart question. That is. Caitlin Collins, one of
my least favorite at the mainstream media. So we are
just learning now that it's being reported that the cop
pilot of the Blackhawk helicopter was a female pilot with
five hundred hours. Not making any judgment on that, only
giving you information, so we continue to assess the situation. There.
(17:18):
Joining me now the managing editor over at NewsBusters at
the Media Research Center, our friend Curtis how Is back
with us. Curtis, welcome to the program.
Speaker 5 (17:27):
Always a pleasure grant, but yeah, this one's a tough one.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
It is, and I want to thank you, Curtis. I'm
going to tell you did such a great job of
putting information out there, not just negative about the media.
You had very informative stuff Early on. I was following
your Twitter feed. I urge everyone to follow you on Twitter.
It was very very helpful. So thank you for that.
But I want to ask you specifically about the media
and their reaction. They're going nuts over this diversity, equity
(17:54):
and inclusion claimed by President Trump and then trying to
make it out like it's the worst thing that ever had. Yeah.
Speaker 12 (18:01):
What's interesting is President Trump is just kind of doing
what you were doing at your monologue. He was raising
a whole bunch of different possibilities. He wasn't specifically suggesting
one over the other was going to prevail as the
reason why. You know, and I don't really see entirely
what the problem is.
Speaker 5 (18:22):
I personally, my style of things, I wouldn't, but this is.
Speaker 12 (18:25):
Who President Trump is and he's elevating this issue of diversity, equity,
and inclusion. And these are real things that have been
going on in this government. And even if you want
to take out DEI, just from a pure staffing levels
issue that you mentioned a few minutes ago, what was
going what has been going on not just at Reagan National,
but airports across the country and air traffic controller shortage
as more people roll off because there's mandatory retirement ages.
(18:49):
Just like you see with pilots, there's also a pilot shortage.
Mayor Pete in his you know, fun four years, including
a very long paternity leave during a supply chains didn't
solve any of those things. So now it's on President
Trump and Secretary Duffy to fix these issues.
Speaker 5 (19:06):
I would say, though Grant last night, the media should.
Speaker 12 (19:09):
Focus on their own house first and cleaning that up,
considering a lot of them were claiming passing along a
headline that said, Trump guts key Aviation Safety Committee fireusheads
of TSA and Coastguard, suggesting that somehow Trump gutted aviation
safety and within a week we had this deadly plane crash. No,
the Safety Committee makes recommendations regarding TSA airport check in
(19:34):
nothing to do with your one's ability to fly the plane.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Yeah, it's amazing to me that they'll read at someplace
and others run with it. They don't even fact check
for themselves. Let me play early on. This is CNN
blaming President Trump for the crash for my producers. This
is number thirteen to play for me. It's really quite
stunning that you know, they're blame and President Trump for
(19:57):
blaming DEI. Early on, they're blaming President Trump even earlier
than he came out blaming DEI. Listen to this.
Speaker 13 (20:03):
That hour of anguish the President started talking about just
instantaneously turned into a period of blame. Blaming former Secretary
of Transportation Pete Buddha Jedge, blaming former President Barack Obama,
blaming former President Joe Biden. The buck clearly does not
stop with this president. The blame begins with him. Well,
(20:25):
the blame begins with him.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
There was another clip I remember from earlier, was very
early on in the crash from CNN, and they were
going on and on about how this was President Trump's
fault and he's just taken over. So this is par
for the course with them, isn't it. Curtis Yeah.
Speaker 12 (20:41):
Abby Phillip, host of CNN Newsnight CNN Thunderdome, was making
this claim talking about how we don't have this person
and there's no this person, you know, because all these
people resigned ahead of President Trump's inauguration. I mean, if
the safety was so important, these people could have stayed
instead of offered their resignations before he came on, doing sure.
Speaker 5 (21:00):
A smooth transition. And also I think the media sometimes.
Speaker 12 (21:03):
Put too much importance in like the top job in
some of these agencies where there's thousands of people and
it's very kind of orderly operation in terms of, you know,
the process and so too. I think that's the issue.
But they called it on Hinge, they called it unpresidential.
Their aviation correspondent sent after President Trump's remarks that he
(21:24):
had somehow made life for the families hellish.
Speaker 6 (21:27):
He had no evidence to make that claim.
Speaker 5 (21:29):
Of course, he went full Jim Acosta.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Yeah, look, the families are going to want answers, just
like President Trump and all of us do. I'll play
one more for you before I let you go. This
is Peter Alexander suggesting exactly what you were talking about earlier.
Watch this.
Speaker 14 (21:45):
So among the questions that we're not asked right now
is whether his effort, as you know, the administration recently
sent a letter to all federal workers basically offering them
an opportunity to quate or.
Speaker 1 (21:55):
Resign and to receive some form of a payout to.
Speaker 14 (21:59):
Depart working for the administration, if he had any concerns
that that effort may deplete the administration, including the FAA
their air traffic control community, of some of the veterans
who have the expertise that is needed to serve in
those control towers around the country.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
These people are so dumb, Curtis, that letter went out
this week. How in the world are people going to
be leaving their jobs already? That's not happening.
Speaker 12 (22:27):
Yeah, a Kendall reporter there from NBC doesn't understand the
fact that these air traffic controllers like that is not
a work from home job, and that's part of the
buyout fit process, the buyout offer that President Trump has
put out to federal employees. Michael Stranger tried to do
this with Caroline Levitt yesterday. He was saying, like, well,
what about all the doctors that are going to leave
(22:48):
government service, And She's like, well, doctors work in hospital,
so they kind of actually do need to show up.
Speaker 15 (22:54):
So I don't really.
Speaker 5 (22:55):
Quite know how that works.
Speaker 12 (22:56):
They never have to feel, the fact checkers grant, they
never have to feel the consequences of their own actions
when it comes to accountability. It is one profession that
can continually get things wrong and they don't suffer the
consequences in terms of their bottom line or their performance
or their employment unless it comes to corporate layoffs.
Speaker 1 (23:14):
Such a good point. Curtis how real quick give your
Twitter handle x x handle because you're doing great work
over there.
Speaker 12 (23:22):
All one word, Curtis how houc K and I'm Curtis
with a C.
Speaker 1 (23:28):
All right, man, man, thank you for coming on. I
appreciate the work you do at NewsBusters as well. We
appreciate you. Same to you, my friend. Absolutely, we'll see
you soon. We'll continue to follow the story because I
think it's gonna be a long time before we get
some real, real answers in all of this. Hey, folks,
you need to learn about energized health and innercellular hydration,
supercharge your energy, boost your immune system, and dramatically increase
(23:50):
your brain function, look and feel years younger, all through
a simple and natural process. Don't believe me. Go to
energizedhealth dot com and check out the hundreds of amazing testimonials.
Energized Health offers one hundred percent money back guarantee. They're
A plus rated and have held thousands over twenty years.
I lost fifteen pounds in two weeks with energized Health
(24:10):
and I've kept it off. Now what five six months later,
still feeling great? This system works. Energizedhealth dot com. While
you're there, check out their free masterclass that's energizedhealth dot com.
And you make sure you tell them Grant Stinchfield sent
you all right, Cashpattel, our buddy here face the DC
mob in his hearing today to be the next FBI director.
(24:31):
How do you do you can guess? Next? Welcome back everyone,
So our buddy, Cashpateel, who's on this program so often,
face the music today finally in front of a Senate
(24:53):
committee and He did fabulous, just as I expected him
to do well. The Democrats came out swinging. Of course,
they kept focusing on ret atribution and does he have
an enemy's list. I'm not even gonna go there for
him because it was such ridiculous questioning, But I will
tell you they wanted to hear about January sixth. Okay,
they focused in on January sixth. Of course they did well.
Ted Cruz helped Cash Pattel out a little bit by
(25:15):
leading the questioning in this direction.
Speaker 16 (25:18):
How many times did Dodo approach Capitol police and ask
if they needed National Guard assistants?
Speaker 9 (25:25):
I believe those letters are well documented, numerous instances, and
numerous of those instances, those requests were shut down.
Speaker 16 (25:35):
Now my correct, at the Capitol sergeant at arms set
assistance was unnecessary, That's correct, Senator. Who did the sergeant
at arms report to the Speaker of the House That
would have been Nancy Pelosi at the time.
Speaker 1 (25:47):
Is that correct? But yes, Senator, this is why they
don't want Cashptel to be the FBI director. See Cash
Hotel already knows all the evildoers, all the players. He
was the one who exposed the Russian collusion. Hoax. He
knows the inside game in Washington, and he knows the
players responsible, including this guy asking the questions. Adam Schiff,
(26:11):
the new senator from California. I hate even just saying
that he's a senator, but he is. He tried to
play a little game with Cash, and Cash wasn't having it.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
Turn around.
Speaker 5 (26:22):
I'm looking at you.
Speaker 10 (26:22):
You're talking about to look at them. I want you
to look at them if you can, if you have
the court, to look them in the eye, mister Bottel,
and tell them you're proud of what you did. Tell
them you're proud that you raised money off of people
that assaulted their colleagues, that pepper sprayed them, that beat
them with poles.
Speaker 1 (26:40):
Tell them you're proud of what you did.
Speaker 10 (26:42):
Mister Mittel. They're right there, they're guarding you today. Tell
them how proud you are.
Speaker 5 (26:46):
That's an abject line, you know it.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
I love Cash Mittel. He was asking him a turnaround
and look at the Capitol police officers, and he said,
I'm looking at you. That's the kind of leadership we need,
not going to back down to the bullying of a
pencil neck. And one more for you, Mazie Herono the
dope of the Senate. She doesn't disappoint again.
Speaker 5 (27:08):
Here your answer yes or no?
Speaker 1 (27:09):
Did you make money?
Speaker 5 (27:11):
I don't have those last time I'm going.
Speaker 1 (27:13):
To ask you that question. You have that information, so
you refuse to answer the question. I answered thirteen hundred pages.
You are.
Speaker 5 (27:23):
No answer, and yet you spread dangerous misinformation.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
She's unble louse. She has thirteen hundred pages and answer
all of her questions. Of course. Well, joining me now,
former FBI special agent and former Navy seal Jonathan Gilliam
is with us. Jonathan is good to see you, welcome.
What did you make of cash his performance today?
Speaker 7 (27:46):
It's good to be with you again, Grant. I think
Cash did great. He just doesn't take any of their nonsense.
For me though, watching these things, it's it's just, first
of all, these hearings are worth Let's say Cash Fatael
was a bad guy. They never get to the bottom
of who these people are. It's just grandstanding and narrative
(28:09):
pushing so they can get headlines, and so the media
can push these headlines out right, so that first off,
they're a failure in actually finding out who these people
are that are going to be serving these important positions,
and secondly, it displays the incompetence and almost dei type
(28:29):
of people that serve in our Senate often in the
House of Representatives. It's very disturbing for me to watch
this stuff, especially when they're just going off of a narrative.
They can't even dig into somebody's background. They have to
go off a narrative, and it just comes off being
(28:51):
absolutely ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
So, you know, Tulci Gabbard also was having her hearing
today to the DNI, and this was her opening statement. Again,
she's a former Democrat. She's now saying, you know what,
She's embraced the MAGA movement. And I've talked to her
at length about this, and I've given her great leeway
on this. I believe that she is sincere. Now it
(29:13):
didn't always I do. Now this is her opening statement,
and it shows you who she is.
Speaker 2 (29:18):
Really accusing me of being Trump's puppet, Putin's puppet, Assad's puppet,
a Guru's puppet, Mody's puppet, not recognizing the absurdity of
simultaneously being the puppet of five different puppet masters. The
same tactic was used against President Trump and failed. The
(29:39):
American people elected President Trump with a decisive victory and
mandate for change. The fact is what truly unsettles my
political opponents is I refuse to be their puppet.
Speaker 1 (29:54):
Why do the Democrats hate her so much is because
she switched parties.
Speaker 7 (30:00):
I don't think they ever really liked her. Grant and
I share your feelings with Tulsi. Although I don't trust her,
I'm going to be honest with you. She's the one
pick that I do not trust. However, it is interesting
to hear her say these things because I don't think
that many of the Democrats. She was at the top
of the heap. She was a vice chair of the DNC.
But when we talk about the Democrat power hitters, they
(30:22):
don't like people like Tulsi because one she's attractive and
two she's smart, and they don't like that. Because see Tulsi,
one thing I will give her is she's served in
a real unit in the military.
Speaker 3 (30:37):
In the Army.
Speaker 7 (30:38):
Well, these people that you just saw in the Senate hearing,
and many of the leftist representatives and even the Rhinos,
they've never done anything in their life. They just went
from college to representing and maybe they were an advisor
somewhere these silver bullets that they ride, and they.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Hate people like Tulsi.
Speaker 7 (30:56):
Even though she was speaking their language, they still feel
threat her because they'll never truly be experts. And people
who are compulsive, narcissistic liars hate people with real experience.
And I think that's been Tulsi's Achilles hill the whole
time she's been in politics.
Speaker 1 (31:14):
Yeah, I think you're right, great assessment. As always, Jonathan gilliam.
I appreciate your services country and coming on the program.
Thank you. You got agree absolutely, and it'sco scene as
well too. All right, folks, listen, an underreported story about
an American service member killed in Gaza. We have that mystery.
It continues next. Wait till you hear this. This is
(31:35):
one the mainstream media is not talking about. Welcome back everyone,
Now to a story that should get your attention. Do
you remember back in May we had three members of
(31:56):
our military that were injured while building at aid peer
in Gaza. Remember this peer that Biden had ain't sure
We had to get food into Gaza, and we built
this giant peer to the tune of three hundred and
twenty million dollars. Well, we're now learning that one of
the soldiers had died. He died in October, but the
(32:19):
secrecy surrounding his death, the military would not reveal it.
They would not really reveal how they were even injured.
The entire thing was a secret. That man you're looking
at on your screen as a man who died at
Sergeant Quandarius stan Lee, who was twenty three years old.
Remember Joe Biden said there'd be no boots on the ground.
Here's a little trip down memory lane talking about how
(32:42):
they would build this peer. This is Joe Biden tonight.
Speaker 17 (32:47):
I'm directing the US military to lead an emergency mission
to establish a temporary peer in the Mediterranean on the
coast of Gaza. They can receive large shipments carrying food, water,
medicine the temporary Sheldon.
Speaker 15 (33:01):
No US boots will be on the ground.
Speaker 17 (33:04):
A temporary peer will enable a massive increase demount of
meditarian assistance getting into Gauze every day.
Speaker 1 (33:12):
Well, again, it's just another one of Joe Biden's lies. Clearly,
if the military is helping build it, you got to
have boots on the ground, and now we have a
dead soldier because of it. Well, joining me now is
someone who's trying to uncover the truth about what happened
to Kwandarius Stanley, former Green Beret host of Speak the
Truth podcast. Our new friend Matt Tardio is back with us. Matt,
(33:33):
it is good to see you again. Explain to me
what's going on here with Sergeant Stanley's death.
Speaker 15 (33:40):
I mean, honestly, it's pretty simple.
Speaker 18 (33:42):
When the Humanitarian Aid Peer was being constructed, we look
back over time, there was originally videos. You know, the
US Army, believe it or not, was actually responsible for
building this sucker. Army actually has more boats than the Navy,
believe it or not, and they're a lot smaller. But regardless,
the US Army hasn't and they were loading off the
coast of Israel while they.
Speaker 15 (34:02):
Were constructing this Humanitarian Aid Peer.
Speaker 18 (34:04):
After they finished building it, it got put together and
it got towed into shore, and then we ended up
having contractors essentially that were over there at the Peer Guardian.
We gave them a little bit of special equipment to
make sure that the sucker didn't get blown up.
Speaker 15 (34:15):
Now, after it got anchored right, it.
Speaker 18 (34:18):
Was in operation for about a total of three days.
Because of the winds and the waves and everything else
that you're seeing over there, that's actually a video, the
one that you have up on the screen of After
it got anchored down, those waves came in and busted
it apart and it started floating up to the north
over where the Portobash dods at, which is about twenty
six twenty seven miles to the north of where they
anchored it over inside Gaza. So we had a perfectly
(34:40):
good pier or ports excuse me, actual functioning port delivering
nation's worth of supplies twenty six miles to the north
where the government decided to spend three hundred and twenty
six million dollars on it. Now, as that was being
built all the way back in April May time frame
when we saw it actually getting built, Hamas was firing
rockets at the US members that were floating off in
(35:01):
the ocean, and what we ended up seeing was some
of those rockets splashing down in and around.
Speaker 15 (35:05):
They weren't very accurate.
Speaker 18 (35:06):
You got a lot of homemade rockets that come out
of there, but they end up splashing it out there.
Speaker 1 (35:10):
Well.
Speaker 18 (35:10):
One of those days, and we don't really know what happens,
a construction accident, maybe one of these soldiers ends up
getting injured. Turns out it's Quandarius Stanley. He ends up
dying in about a week before he dies, he actually
gets like they I don't want to say they kick
him out of the military, but they ets and they
boot him from the military about a week before he dies.
(35:31):
The Army doesn't announce his death because that would look
really really bad on the Abiden administration. They said we
were going to have boots on the ground, and I
don't believe we did have US service members on the ground.
But what we did have was that Humanitarian Aid Peer
bust apart. We had three service members total that got injured.
One of them later ends up dying. The government like
kicks him out the military before he dies, about a
(35:53):
week two weeks before he dies, the Humanitarian Aid Peer
gets floated up the shore. They end up grabbing it
and pulling it back. But Grant, you want to hear
the craziest about this entire thing, Like the craziest, Yeah,
I think you do. Back in June, it was June
twenty first, June twenty first. This last year, twenty twenty four,
UN Famine Review Committee ends up filing a report about
(36:15):
the level of hunger that was taking place inside Gaza
and they conducted this review in May, and do you
know what they found. They ended up finding at the time,
and I'm gonna go quote no evidence of famine.
Speaker 1 (36:27):
None.
Speaker 15 (36:28):
And that's during major operations.
Speaker 18 (36:30):
That were taking place down inside of Rafa, which, by
the way, the Biden administration decided to hold up weapons
shipments to Israel, where we very well probably had US
hostages being held down in Rafa. We know we had
a US hostage that was killed in Rafa in a
freaking tunnel.
Speaker 1 (36:49):
So you just saw the UN report there that says
there's no famine, which means you don't need an AID peer.
But even if you need, there's the report. But even
if you need an AID peer, as you pull out
just a few miles to the north, there is a
massive port in Israel that right there on your screen.
There's a massive port in Israel that literally you could
(37:12):
bring all the aid you need it and you'd never
have to put a member of our military in danger,
Which now gets me to the question, we had him
in danger, they get injured, and they kick him out
of the military. How does this remain so quiet? And
how did you realize this guy was now dead?
Speaker 18 (37:31):
The Military Times dropped an article, and when I saw
Military Times that dropped the article, I was like, you know,
where did Military Times get this?
Speaker 15 (37:37):
Information?
Speaker 18 (37:38):
Ends up coming from his obituary. That's how we figured
it out. His family published his obituary on the line.
It wasn't an announcement by the military nothing.
Speaker 15 (37:47):
It's sad.
Speaker 18 (37:48):
It's literally using US service members as pawns for what
for people that weren't hungry to get them three days
worth of food.
Speaker 1 (37:57):
That's preposterous, asolutely ridiculous.
Speaker 15 (38:01):
It's a like and.
Speaker 1 (38:04):
This, of course is all under the Biden administration. I
expect things to change drastically under the Trump administration, but
I would also like them to investigate the Trump administration
the circumstances surrounding uh Gundarius Stanley. Because you're telling me
he's kicked out. You say, ets, what does that mean
when you say kicked out of it?
Speaker 15 (38:25):
He gets his paperwork, he's out of the military.
Speaker 18 (38:27):
They probably did what we call like a med board
or a medical evaluation board, where they say, look this guy,
he's beyond like repair. He's not going to be able
to get back in. But I mean, the man's on
his deathbed. This is like the equivalent of taking somebody
that gets wounded in Afghanistan or Iraq back when we
were at war and waiting like and again we're not
talking about like a year, two years, three years down
(38:48):
the road. We're talking about literally about a week before
his death, right week to two weeks before.
Speaker 15 (38:53):
Question for you they end up mount Is.
Speaker 1 (38:56):
There any plans to give this man and you know,
a purple heart you die in combat? I mean, you
give him some medals for what he did and all
of these things. Is there any any kind of accommodations
going to him?
Speaker 18 (39:14):
Not that I'm aware of, Not that I'm aware of,
And I'm not even sure that he died in combat
because they have been so hushed about it.
Speaker 15 (39:20):
They just don't want anybody to know.
Speaker 18 (39:22):
I mean, they had We lost three service members back
in I think it was January of last year, so
about a year has passed now. Three service members ended
up dying in Jordan that barely even made like the news.
Barely three US service members end up getting killed in Jordan,
and that's after the two Navy seals. This entire situation
over in the Middle East with Israel was just It's
(39:44):
like it was handled by people that wanted to drag
it out and the sad part it's just not Quandarius Stanley.
We also had the US hostages over inside Gaza, one
of which ended up getting murdered inside of a tunnel
in Rafa, and that particular town happens to be where
they're like. One of these US hostages was found murdered
Byjamas after the Biden administration pretty much halted Israel from
(40:06):
going in there by halting their weapon shipments.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
Yeah, that really is. It's stunning. I'm grateful for the
research that you're doing on so many topics. Former Green
Beret Matt Tardio. Tell them again where your podcast is
and where they can find you.
Speaker 18 (40:22):
Find me on pretty much any audio download platform to use,
Apple Podcasts, whatever. You can also find the video version
of it on YouTube at Speak the Truth Podcast.
Speaker 1 (40:31):
All right, Matt, it's good to see you. Thank you,
and keep us posted on this story and others as well.
All right, up next, we'll get more into RFK Junior's
hearings with the great Doctor Peter McCollum is with us.
(40:55):
You know, it takes a lot of money from Big Pharma.
Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders just so happens to two
that were really hammering RFK Junior about whether or not
he'd take money from big farmer. Have they not been
watching this guy. Here's RFK work twenty twenty.
Speaker 5 (41:10):
In twenty twenty, you were the single largest.
Speaker 6 (41:13):
Because of my receiver moneations from workers all over this country.
Speaker 1 (41:19):
Workers. You were this not a nickel from corporate You was.
Speaker 18 (41:23):
The single largest acceptor harmaceutical dollars from workers in five million.
Speaker 1 (41:31):
Nothing like turning the tables on your questioner. Joining me now,
world renowned cardiologist, epidemiologist and chief scientific officer at the
Wellness Company, Doctor Peter McCullough is with us. Doc is
good to see you, Good to see you. All right.
Your assessment of Robert F. Kennedy Junior, I know you
know him. It was, you know, some of these interchanges
(41:54):
were comical almost.
Speaker 19 (41:57):
It was self interest, conflict of interest, big food, big
pharma on display.
Speaker 5 (42:05):
It couldn't be more apparent.
Speaker 19 (42:07):
Bernie Sanders trying to say it's the big pharmaceutical workers. Well, yeah,
they're the ones who influenced him, the same thing with
Elizabeth Warren and they're pounding RFK. That one I thought
that was so obvious was Elizabeth Warren, who takes money
from pharmaceutical companies. She was trying to get RFK to
(42:30):
promise that he wasn't going to go after pharmaceutical companies.
I mean they probably told her, you know, in the
days beforehand they gave the pharmaceutical Agency, companies gave these
senators their marching orders.
Speaker 5 (42:45):
They were creating talking points for themselves. They were not
examining Kennedy.
Speaker 1 (42:50):
No, they sure weren't a lot of news happening on
the health front. We've got RFK Junior's confirmation, and then
we've got President Trump signing this order to be taking
the United States out of the World Health Organization and
those finding a thirty seven million dollar payment was supposed
to go to WHO. After President Trump had signed this order.
(43:10):
What do you make of all of this in the
United States saying enough is enough with WHO?
Speaker 19 (43:15):
You know, Trump responded to not only sentiment here in America,
but all over the world. You know, last summer at
the World Health Assembly, which is their big meeting, there
were global protests, including those right there in Geneva, but
all over the world. The entire world wants to pull
out of the WHO, because the WHO is a sinkhole.
Speaker 5 (43:37):
For money, draining the world's resources. It's a bum off.
Speaker 19 (43:41):
And it had international health regulations and Pandemic Treaty Alliance
that was trying to take global control of healthcare. So
you know the who wrote Trump back and said, boy,
we're sorry to see you go.
Speaker 5 (43:54):
You've been in since nineteen forty eight.
Speaker 19 (43:57):
We've been trying to improve our transparency and cost effectiveness
for seven years. And what I told Laura Ingram is,
you know, Trump just gave them a twenty percent budget cut.
Speaker 5 (44:08):
They're going to have to get efficient quick. Good riddance.
Speaker 1 (44:12):
Yeah, good Riddens is right on this issue of gain
of function research. I'm somewhat torn. I know the dangers
of it certainly, and I know the lab leak or
deliberate leak from China and that Wuhan lab caused such
problems here in the United States. I worry if we
stop gain of function, our enemies continue it. We're not
on an equal playing field. Is there a way you
(44:34):
can set my mind at EASi or do I have
legitimate concerns here?
Speaker 19 (44:38):
You know, there is research called pathogens of pandemic potential
of dual purpose, that is, pathogens that can create the
problem and then the research to actually be able to
defend against it, what's called the countermeasures.
Speaker 5 (44:54):
What we need is we need control over this grant.
Speaker 19 (44:57):
There's thirteen BSL level four, which is the highest risk,
that's like will Han China. We have thirteen of those
in the United States, and we have one hundred and
forty eight BSL threes.
Speaker 5 (45:09):
That's a lot. There's really no inventory of who's doing what.
And just to stop the.
Speaker 19 (45:16):
Federal funding for the research doesn't mean the Chinese can't
come in and fund these labs, which they were funding
one in California or the Gates Foundation. So I think
we need an overhaul of our plan regarding this whole
endeavor of research, a temporary moratorium and then having the
government really take control, tight control in our highest.
Speaker 5 (45:38):
Biosecurity labs possible.
Speaker 1 (45:40):
And I would say not having government officials that are
in bed with the laboratories and the private companies that
are running this running these studies, because then you're not
getting any oversight. Everybody's just lying in their pockets with
the grant money, and that causes a huge problem. Real quick,
before I let you go, I know I've showed you
this before, but this is the new feet old kit
from the Wellness Company. I think it's the coolest thing,
(46:03):
going real quick in about thirty seconds.
Speaker 19 (46:05):
Doc, the best pitch for this field Kit grant is
for you and the preppers, people who want everything.
Speaker 5 (46:12):
They're ready to survive the next catstite. Get a field kit.
Speaker 1 (46:17):
I love it. Lots of medications and you're going to
keep you safe and could save your life. Actually, Doctor
Peter mccull it's great having you on. Thank you, Thank you.
Absolutely hey. Here's how you get the field kit and
ten percent off if you want it TWC Dot Health
Forward Slash Voice, use the promo code voice as I said,
to save ten percent again TWC Dot Health Forward Slash Voice.
(46:40):
Or you can just get one of these two. And
this is what I started with. This is the other
regular kit TWC Dot Health Forward Slash Voice. All right,
Chicago Mayor Johnson spouting off again against trumpet and that's next. Well,
(47:03):
here's my parting gift to you, Mayor Johnson of Chicago
spouting off about President Trump.
Speaker 20 (47:10):
That White House is being ran in one of the
most raggedy forms of government that I've ever seen. If
anybody is questioning whether or not what our country will
look like having Confederacy won.
Speaker 3 (47:22):
There should be no question. Now they want us to
be afraid. Do not be afraid, Chicago.
Speaker 1 (47:33):
Raggedy form of government. Chicago is about as raggedy as
it gets. Do not be afraid, Chicagans. You got murderers
and gang members around every corner, and you can't protect
yourself because the liberals are taking your guns away. Stint shields,
army rolls. Folks. We'll see you tomorrow, seven pm Eastern Time.
Popular Podcasts
40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season
Daniel Jeremiah of Move the Sticks and Gregg Rosenthal of NFL Daily join forces to break down every team's needs this offseason.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.