Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush Limbo Show Podcast. Yes, yes,
I know holds the rotten fruit. I feel the same
way as you. I overslept a little this morning and
I kind of woke up and stumbled downstairs, and I
was thinking, all, I can't wait to hear what Rush
(00:20):
has to say about all the stuff that broke late
on Friday, about the Hunter Biden investigation and the Supreme
Court declining to hear the Texas case and all the
rest of it. I can't wait, can't wait for Rush
to break it all down so I know what to
think about the whole thing. And then, of course I've
(00:42):
found out I was going to be sitting here myself
at midday Eastern. Rush is feeling better than he did
on Fridays. You know, he had to take the day
off on Friday, was totally clouded. He's feeling he's feeling
better today. And the plan is for Rush to it
turn tomorrow, and you will not want to miss that
because he will be at full strength and full strength Rush,
(01:06):
you have to stand far back from the receiving apparatus.
It is so strong. One eight hundred two eight two
two eight eight two is the number to call if
you would like to be on the show. Always love
to hear from lefties. If you're feeling pleased about how
things are going on your side, and there's no reason
why you wouldn't, and you might have some more good
(01:26):
news on Georgia come early January. If you feel him
pleased and you're a lefty, coming and give me a call,
give it your best shot. One eight hundred two eight
two two eight eight two. You will have the pleasure
of mister Snadley call screening from the EIB Southern Command.
We have Mike in New York making sure that it
(01:48):
is all technically competent, even if the content has gone
to hell, and we have a full week of excellence
in broadcasting planned for you. Whatever happened a lot of
a lot of strangely revealing indiscretions over the weekend. I
don't mean Nerek Swalwell and Fang Fang will get into
(02:11):
Fang Fang. Actually, I don't want to get too far
Fang Fang because you never know how many other people
have gotten into Fang Fang. But we'll get in Derek
Swalwell and then a bit later, the Attorney General, William
Barr says. He is reported as saying the Attorney general
just for those people who aren't mad enough at the
(02:32):
attorney General. The Attorney General William Barr says Trump is
a deposed king ranting, a deposed king ranting to me.
The interesting word there is deposed and a curious, curious
choice of words. But that's Bill Bar. Trump is a
deposed king ranting. There was a rally in Washington. I
(02:55):
believe this was Saturday. The my pillow guy speaking of
deposing the king. The my pillow Guy says Fox News
was in on the fix. He's the guy who's um
well for it shows like Tucker that all the squeamish
advertisers have abandoned. Basically, it's the flippity whatever what is
(03:19):
it called, the flippity fish and the my pillow guy
who are accounting for all Tucker's ads. But and my
pillow Guy now says Fox News was in on the
fix as we speak. As we speak, the electoral College
is meeting. Basically, the electors will be voting up until
(03:45):
seven pm Eastern four pm Pacific. That's when the last
state votes, Hawaii. But my state, New Hampshire was one
of the first. It votes at ten am, and it
has sent its slate of election to Congress. Now, Stephen
Miller and Aid to the President revealed this morning that
(04:09):
the plan is for Republicans to submit their own slate
of electors. They will meet, they will vote, and they
will submit their alternative slates of electors to Congress in order,
(04:29):
if you can follow all this, that there will be
alternative sets of electors for Congress to vote for if
they so decide. Now, if you're thinking, what is all
this rubbish, well, it happens more often than you think.
They did it last time twenty sixteen Ohio, a couple
of Ohio Democrats did this, submitted an alternative vote to
(04:55):
Congress by electors, and it happened, of course, most consequentially
in the eighteen seventy sixth election, which was Samuel Tilden
versus Rutherford B. Hayes. And because of the electoral disputes
about elections and electoral fraud, this all goes back awares.
(05:19):
I've said on this show there is a long history
of this nonsense here and last eighteen seventy six there
were threats of violence against Republican voters and there was
overcounts in South Carolina in eighteen seventy six, one hundred
and one percent of all eligible voters voted. And you
(05:40):
had a situation where the voter of Oregon, the governor
of Oregon, Lafayette Grover, claimed that one of the GOP's
electors was ineligible and he's put a Democrat elector in
his place, and the two Republican electors dismissed his action,
and they each reported three votes for Hayes, while the
(06:02):
Democrat elector reported one vote for Tilden and two votes
for Hey, and the whole thing anyway, that's what they're
going to do this time. They're they're gonna submit these
alternative Now, they have had some good news this morning,
and I know people like good news and like to
find it where they can. But in Wisconsin, for example,
(06:24):
the Supreme Court has said that this whole idea that
you're indefinitely confined by COVID is false and those people
shouldn't have been entitled of it. This happened this morning.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court said that election officials were wrong
(06:44):
and that the ballots of those who claim to be
indefinitely confined because of the COVID, their ballots were illegitimate
and could not be counted. They've ruled in favor of
the Republican Party of Wisconsin, and again we're trapped. Well
(07:04):
well exactly, misters, sadly say, what does that mean? The
fact that the fact of the matter is that in
the reality of the world we live in, the world
has the world has pronounced Joe Biden the victor, And
every day that went by after November the third, it
becomes more and more difficult as a practical matter to
say no, no, no, he wasn't. Now the Wisconsin Supreme
(07:26):
Court has said that these guys their ballots should not
count if they claimed that they need in mail in
ballots because of the COVID. The court says a determination
must be made in every case before tossing a ballot.
This fall, roughly two hundred and fifteen thousand voters in
(07:50):
Wisconsin say they were indefinitely confined, a fourfold increase from
twenty sixteen, and the court said that the government's interpretation
of the indefinitely confined law was erroneous. The presence of
a communicable disease in the community, such as COVID nineteen,
(08:12):
does not entitle all voters in Wisconsin to obtain an
absentee ballot. Well, what do you do? That would have
been a useful court decision up to about October twenty ninth.
In its final decision, the Justice is the Justice is
concluded that it's up to each voter to decide. If
(08:36):
I don't even understand this, I'll look for more information here.
I'm going to have to read the court opinion on
this because I don't even get some of this stuff.
But it's being reported as a victory for the Trump
campaign that Wisconsin Supreme Court has said the election officials
were wrong. You know something, it's very difficult, it's very
(08:58):
difficult staggering on with this. The Supreme Court denied standing.
Denied the Texas case on the basis of standing. And
standing is what they call a threshold question as to
whether you have the right to bring a case. You know,
if if if Fred Smith gets fired for breach of contract,
(09:24):
fred Smith's nephew can't sue the company for the breach
of contract because he would have had a much bigger
Christmas present if his uncle hadn't lost his job. You've
got to you've got to be directly injured in order
to claim standing. And I think there's no doubt that
(09:44):
when you look at this election, if it changes the result,
if it means that the constitutionally mandated balance, the constitutionally
mandated weight of your vote is diminished because false and
illegitimate votes in another state determine the election, then I
(10:04):
think that is a case of original jurisdiction that the
Supreme Court should have heard. There's there's no doubt about that.
Alito and Clarence Thomas were the only ones who were
prepared to do that two out of nine judges. The
other seven judges weren't interested. And you are you wonder why, Well,
I think there's two reasons. In a way, the more
(10:25):
respectable reason is that they're figuring the Republicans are going
to lose the Georgia Senate runoff race, and then they
will be punished. The Supreme Court will be punished by
court packing for agreeing to take this case. And I
think the other one is even more basic. If you're
someone like Amy Coney Barrett and you've got school aged kids,
(10:48):
and you live in the world we live in, you've
you've got to be you've got to be placing a
very large bet. And I don't say this lightly. I
say this after twenty years of living with living with
threats from Jahadists and similar type lunatics, and seeing my
friends around the world forced into hiding those Danish cartoonists
(11:14):
who did the Mohammed cartoons in two thousand and five
and had goons showing up at their children's schools threatening
their children. And what you just used to be the
province of lunatics like those Jehardis is now the province
of people who support the Democrat Party. We just said
a guy kicked off the college he's been some sort
(11:37):
of associate lecturer at for a decade or whatever, has
just vaporized him, removed all mention of him from their
website because he happened to write a piece saying he
didn't think quote unquote doctor Jill Biden should be going
around calling herself doctor Jill Biden. Just for that, the
college decided to disassociate himself. I think the actual practical
(12:01):
things here are the issue that the people are very
real fears of physical violence. The more respectable argument, the
John Roberts type of argument, is that if you take
this case, the Democrats will punish you with packing the court.
But it is the most bait. There's no point to
any of it. There's no point to courts, there's no
(12:23):
point to law, there's no point to citizenship, there's no
point to elections. If you hold elections and the results
are dubious, and we get more and more of this
stuff every other day. This other story over the weekend
that these hackers hacked into the United States Commerce Department
(12:44):
and the United States Treasury Department. You may have seen
this report. And they use Solo Winds software. They got
access to the Treasury Department and the Commerce Department using
Solo Winds software, which, just by the kind of strange
coincidence that now goes on every minute of the day
in America, is the software that dominion voting systems uses.
(13:08):
It's all connected, folks, The whole grand universal theory tie
it altogether. It all works. One eight hundred two eight
two two eight eight two. Rush is feeling better. He's
planning on coming back tomorrow. But we will do our
best to hold down the fort on the excellence in
broadcasting network. Mark stein in for Rush on the excellence
(13:34):
in broadcasting network. Great to be with you all, by
the way, that pay no attention to this. If you're
listening out there in the great wide world. This is
just for Mike in New York. Mike, my screen clock
has gone down, so if you could just reset that,
it's all everything's going to pieces here. I hate having
to mention that on here, but it just it just happened,
(13:55):
and I need Mike to fix that in New York. Okay.
On that Wisconsin's story, here's the alternative you from the
Associated Press. The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Monday has rejected
President Trump's lawsuit. And that's why I say it's you
always have to act. Actually just read the written opinion,
because in fact they're doing what they what they've done
(14:20):
all the way through this thing is they've conceded that, yes,
there are bad things going on that shouldn't have happened,
but for various reasons, we can't do anything about it now.
For example, in Pennsylvania, where they said they couldn't do
anything about it because of the doctrine of latches. That's where, yeah,
(14:41):
you've got a case, but you should have done something
about it months ago. So for example, they changed the
law in twenty nineteen on voting in Pennsylvania, and therefore
you shouldn't wait. You had plenty of time before the
election and to file a lawsuit about it, so you
(15:02):
shouldn't wait until after you've quote unquote lost the election.
Now likewise, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has done the same.
It said that this law, in fact, this change in
the law is wrong, and it's not and it's not valid,
that the COVID is not a valid reason to have
(15:26):
a mail in ballot, et cetera. But even so, you know,
the elections happened, and they don't want to disenfranchise anybody
now you think about it, because this is what this
is what it comes down to, and this is why
mass movements have to be mass or they're done for.
Everybody is always waiting for somebody else to step in
(15:47):
and be the hero you've got You're you're looking on
the Supreme Court of the United States. I mean again,
I use this line on television with Tucker a month
back or whatever it was. A judge's republic is a
is a contradiction in terms, a contradiction in terms, and
(16:10):
it is never more of a contradiction in terms than
when you're looking for five judges to nullify millions and
millions of votes and say these votes were not appropriate
and should not have been cast. It's very difficult to
do that, and in part because judge is a human,
(16:31):
because judges are vulnerable, because judges don't want to take
the heat. Anybody who's been in the lowest level court,
anyone who's been in slow small claims court, anyone who's
been there had the misfortune to be divorced and wound
up in family court. Anybody who's been in their little
RinkyDink county court knows that judges are the self evidently
(16:55):
third rate for the most part. And so the idea
that you expect five judges to do the work of
an army, you know, like Bill bar says, Trump is
a deposed king ranting. That is what mister Trump's attorney
general thinks of the president he serves. Bill Barr has
(17:18):
been reported as saying Trump is like a deposed king, ranting.
And the thing that puts a deposed king back on
his throne is a mass movement. And to this idea
that five, these five judges would do it. And then
you look at these judges. Clarence Thomas is a great
(17:39):
and gracious man, and if you met him, you know
he radiates strength, strength of character. He could have withstood
well they did to him thirty years ago if he
didn't have that strength of character. And Alito is an
impressive figure too. But you know, others have different calculations,
(18:00):
and they're actually scared at what will happen to them.
You'll become the most hated person. Imagine if five this
is how the left reports it, five people overturn the
United States presidential election. And it doesn't have to be
like that. We can get into all that a little later.
It would be the easiest thing in the world to have,
(18:21):
like a runoff election in the contested states. Blah blah blah,
blah blah. But the fact, even if they were to
go down that road, the pressure they would be, the
pressure that they would be under is enormous. So this
Wisconsin thing that was reported by one outlet as a
(18:42):
great victory for Trump is now being reported as a
rejection for Trump. In a sense, they found on him.
They found for him on the issue that the election
was held under an improp on an improper basis. But
but they're not going to do anything about it. And
that's the other thing. It's the remedy. They'll agree with you,
(19:03):
but they won't give you any relief. Yeah, Rush is
out today's hoping to be back tomorrow. A super spreader, Santa,
has been blamed for an outbreak of the COVID at
and at a care home, a residential care home where
(19:25):
sixty one residents have tested positive for COVID nineteen after
a visit from St. Nicholas. This was in moll Antwerp
in Belgium, my mother's country, Sint n Claus as they
call him there, Saint Nicholas, Santa Claus as we say
here in the United States. Sixty one residents tested positive
(19:50):
for COVID nineteen after being visited by a Santa Claus
who subsequently was found to have the COVID, and the
mayor of moll Wim Kayas, has apologized. He said the
visit was made with the best intent, but it went
wrong and it has been a very black day for
(20:11):
the care home. So Santa is now a COVID super spreader.
In Germany, they're saying, don't bother with Christmas, don't bother
buying Christmas present, so you're only going to spread the COVID.
So actually no one's going to do. The Grinch who
stole Christmas because governments are now stealing Christmas in the
interests of maintaining the COVID regime. Mark signing for US
(20:34):
one eight hundred two eight two eight eight two. You know,
if you don't like you when Rush it's away, there's
a way to get around that, and that is by
becoming a subscriber to the Limball Ladder because it always
gives you something to read when there is some guest
host on the radio. It's the perfect in print companion
or in digital companion to the award winning radio show
(20:59):
and the Limball Letter. If you subscribe to it today,
you'll get a year's subscription, but the year's subscription will
give you thirteen total issues, so you get an extra
month for free. And if you go to Rush Limball
dot com, you'll see the button therefore the Limbell or Letter.
That's also the place you can go by the way
(21:20):
to send a message to Rush. If you just look
above the banner that says the Russia Limbo Show on
the horizontal menu, but at the very top of the page,
you'll see a tab saying share your stories, and if
you click on that, you can send a message to Rush.
And you can also upload an amusing cartoon or a
(21:42):
GIF or whatever it is. But the December is sure
of the Limball Letter. It's a great Christmas issue. So
it shows Rush in Dickensian garb with an old oil lamp,
fabulous scarf, great full length coat and a and a
Christmas tree behind him, and it is full of great
(22:03):
reading material. The Limball Ladder makes a good Christmas present.
And any attention to ankle a mircall, she says, cut
it out on the Christmas gifts. It's just canceled Christmas.
She was raised in East Germany and the Commies canceled
Christmas anyway. So just because she's got that communism beating
still in the core, there's no reason for the rest
(22:25):
of us to get it. Give a subscription. If you
can't go and do little gift shopping hither and Yon,
go to Russian embaar dot com and give a pal
the Rush Limbaugh Letter in print, digital or both. And
if you ordered a day, you can get for the
(22:47):
price of your twelve month subscription thirteen issues. You will
not want to miss that. Let us go to Paul
in Denver, Colorado. Paul your first up on the Russian Emboy.
Great to have you with us. Thank you, Mark, it's
great to be here. And prayers for Rush, of course,
and you're doing a great job as the guest host.
(23:11):
My question is, as I reflect as a layman upon
the various court rulings with this contested election and the
and the real serious legal questions that seems to be asked,
and the courts are doing verbal jiu jitsu. It seems
to avoid ruling on any of this. They don't even
(23:32):
want to look at the evidence. But at the same
time they rushed to pronounce decisions on same sex marriage
or if you want to go back to Rob Wade,
abortion and so these these cultural issues that really are
the province of, you know, how we order our lives.
The judiciary seems very happy to rush in and embrace
(23:54):
and pronounce on those things. But on the truly illegal
issue that it seems very much suited to the judiciary,
are they are missing in action. I'm just I'd be
interested in hearing your thoughts about why that is. Well.
I think that's a brilliant question. I mean, I would say,
though they rule the way they do for the same reason,
(24:17):
and I think that that's because whatever they say, culture
is upstream of politics, and I think to a certain
extent it's upstream of the judiciary too. So, for example,
when it comes to same sex marriage, if they had
ruled against same sex marriage, they would they would have
(24:40):
gotten hell, there would have been calls for court packing
back then, there would have been calls for removing justices.
There would have been calls for mandatory retirement after ten
year terms or whatever. You forget. It's only at the
time they did mandate same sex marriage coast to coast.
It was only thirty years after the Chief Justice had
(25:05):
had supported the I think it was the Texas Laws
against sodomy on the grounds that throughout common law jurisprudence,
this had been regarded as a crime against nature. That
was what the Chief Justice of the United States said
in whatever that was nineteen eighty nine. Now, if you now,
(25:25):
as I said thirty years later, if a chief chief
it's not just that you can't be chief justice with
those views. It's that you can't give a speech on
an American college campus, you couldn't be interviewed on PBS
or NPR, you couldn't write an op ed in an
American newspaper saying that. So we think of these judges
(25:46):
as kind of great, as as super arbiters of human life,
but in the end, they're just five blokes, as susceptible
to the pressures from the vailing culture as anybody else.
And it's not by culture. I don't mean what the
majority of people say. The majority of people might be
(26:08):
opposed to, might think transgender participation in girls' school sports
is ridiculous because it kills girls school sports, because it
means your fourteen year old daughter is competing in track
against some six foot two burly fellow with faint five
(26:29):
o'clock shadow and pert breasts. But the fact is, so
it's not about a mass opinion. It's about the prevailing
winds of the culture. And that's why people like Anthony
Kennedy just fold like in nothing flat on something on
something like same sex marriage, it may barely make an
(26:52):
attempt to argue it seriously. So and that's exactly the
same thing that is going on, and that so that's
exactly an example of exactly the same phenomenon. And I
take your point. I mean it's astonishing, like marriage, for example,
which predates the United States by thousands of years and
has been the same in every culture throughout all human history.
(27:19):
But judges think nothing of redefining that, whereas they're scared
to actually address quite obvious naked electoral fraud in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin.
And the reason is because they're simply responding to the
(27:39):
cultural pressures. And I'll say this too, Paul. You know
this is what and when I said a judge's republic
is a contradiction in terms, and I'll expand on that.
The more you have that is litigated, until you have,
like the United States of the most litigious society in
human history. Everything you can get into a court with anything.
(28:00):
You can take anything to court, and you can plead
it in court, and it doesn't matter what it is.
You can you can spill your cup of coffee from McDonald's.
You've got a court case and it'll be a multimillion
dollar court case. And one of the problems with that,
then is you transfer the regulation of society from a
(28:23):
self regulated society, which is what a republic ought to be.
It's people. The idea of a republic is that it's
not the divine right of kings, it's the people governing themselves.
And when you transfer more and more of that into
the court rooms, and so it eventually becomes instead of
the people regulating themselves and their society, it becomes judges
(28:48):
regulating every aspect of the people's behavior. Then it doesn't
then that is even more than that is even more
prey to sort of human frailty. If there were millions
and millions of Amy Coney Barretts, it wouldn't matter. But
the fact that there's she's just one of five, and
she's worried that people are going to be menacing her
(29:11):
kids as they leave their schools every afternoon. I mean,
this is this is why the whole dependence on judges
to pull your chestnuts out of the fire is all wrong.
In the end, it's too late. It's it's likely too
late now. I mean, I don't claim to know as
much as Steve Miller does about these slates of electors
(29:32):
going up to Congress, But in the end, many, most
people are more cowardly than you think. And just as
on same sex marriage as on electorate fraud, these judges
are feeling the heat. Pall you think, Mark that the
real place too, because of those reasons you just articulated
(29:54):
to address this would be would have been in the
state legislatures where the people really have more. You know,
these seventy five odd million people that voted for President Trump,
we would have had a greater voice. And you know,
I've been concerned about this emphasis on the judiciary this
whole time because it seemed to me that the action
(30:15):
was really in the state legislatures and the governors. And
I don't know if that ship is sailed. I fear
that maybe it has that. Who knows, what do you
think about that? But again, you depend on you know,
all these things, and this is this is why you
can write everything down, checks and balances and all the
rest of it. But in the end, the guy who
(30:35):
has to live up to those checks and balances. I
can state legislature, I don't know it. I don't know
what it is in Colorado, But in my state, a
state representative, I think he gets one hundred and eighty
dollars for going and serving down in conquered. It's not
a lot of it's not a lot of money, and
(30:56):
if they know where you live, it can lead to
some fully difficult problems. So again we're depending on you know,
what the left is good at is intimidation and that's
what you see. They're actually physically on election night, they
physically chase out the so called Republican poll watchers, they
(31:17):
chase them out of the room. And that sums up
what's happened here that in the end, they don't even
care whether you've got your telephone camera recording them and
you're going to post it on the internet because they're
willing to do it. They're willing to do it in public.
They're willing to order you from the room and make
you leave the room. And at some point, you know,
I'm not in favor of doing the Antifa thing and
(31:39):
burning down burning down the convenience store and looting maces.
I've got no desire to loot maces. But I do
think we're coming to a point where civil disobedience actually
is this state command should command no respect. A state
that cannot hold a fair election has negated your citizenship,
(32:02):
and you owe it no allegiance. And in that sense,
that sense, I hate to say this, because it's far
easier to unraffle a peaceful society than put it back
together again. But at a certain point, civil disobedience is
becomes an entirely respectable in the face of these provocations.
(32:23):
But you you are absolutely right, Paul, that you know
the Supreme Court thousands of years of marriage, thousand thousands
of ye oh, yes, we think that's something where where
five judges and we're happy to rewrite marriage laws that
have prevailed across the entirety of human history. That's within
(32:45):
our jurisdiction. I actually no, there's nothing that says that's
within the jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court. But
this state to state relations, which is the basis on
which Texas brought this case, is explicitly within the jurisdiction
of the Supreme Court, and yet they shy away from
(33:07):
it because they're scared. In the end, they cave into
the culture just like just like any cheap jack, third
rate teley celebrity does. They're no different just because they've
got some black robe on, They're no different. That was great,
That was a great question, Paul, and I thank you
for that, and I wish you. I wish you all
(33:28):
the best this somewhat grim advent season as we approach Christmas.
Thanks for a call. We'll be back in just a moment.
Mark Stein in for Rush. As I mentioned, just a
couple of minutes ago. A guy, actually, this guy, Joseph Epstein,
(33:48):
he wrote a piece just saying doctor Jill Biden is
ridiculous because she's got a doctorate so called in education,
which wouldn't even be a thing, but it's now going
to be. It's president elector and doctor Jill Biden. President
elector and doctor Jill Biden. He said she shouldn't be done.
He's in president elect and doctor Biden, she shouldn't be
(34:11):
doned that, and they canceled him this college. He was
at Joseph Epstein for ten years at some visiting lecture
or something. They just removed all trace of him from
the web because he'd bet the less majestay Millennia Trump
had twend you never mind whether or not she should
(34:32):
call herself doctor. They called her a prostitute. They called
her a prostitute. Milania Trump. She had to actually go
and sue. She won I think three million bucks from
the Daily Mail for calling her a prostitute. And yet
she's just meant to suck it up. She's just meant
(34:54):
to suck it up. But you disrespect quote unquote doctor
Jill Biden, and your disap paired permanently like, this guy's
never going to be writing an op ed again. You know,
this is the other thing to watch for, because they're
not waiting till January the twentieth. They're doing it now.
They're clamp down by big tech. You can't say this.
(35:17):
You can't say that a family that got kicked off
a United flight because the two year old burst into
tears when the mask was put. You have to wear
a mask, and the two year old burst into tears,
and the father was holding the mask over the child,
and they kicked the family off the plane. And as usual,
there was all the cell phone footage. It's not just
(35:39):
there's the insanity of the incident, but the fact that
Twitter and Facebook suppressed the video. So you're being kicked
off the plane because you're two year old is terrified
at being forced into a mask. And more than that,
you can't tell the world. There's a Soviet style clampdown
on that. This is what the world is going to
(35:59):
be like after January the twentieth. Mark Stein for Rush.
We have lots more to come. Mark Stein in for us.
The electoral College is meeting as we speak at noon.
A whole my state's already vote in New Hampshire noon,
A big bunch of the Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Maryland, Montana,
(36:22):
on and on will be their electors will be meeting.
The President's plan is for Republican electors to meet and
to file alternative votes with Congress for when Congress meets
on January the sixth. So this thing is not over. Yes,
(36:47):
America's hanker Man is away and this is your undocumented
ankormand Mark Stein thrilled to be here. No supporting paperwork whatsoever.
Rush is feeling a little better than he did on Friday,
and he's hoping to be back tomorrow. So we shall
keep our fingers crossed because I want to hear him
(37:07):
break down all this breaking news. As I said just
before the top of the hour, the Republicans, the Republican
electors are meeting independent of these other electors who've been
meeting all day to day. This is Electoral College Day,
(37:28):
and they all meet in their different states, in their
state capitals at different times. Basically, they started at ten
am Eastern and they'll wrap it up at seven pm
Eastern in Hawaii. But as hasn't really happened on a
widespread scale since eighteen seventy six, or a consequential scale.
(37:49):
The Republican nominees for presidential elector are also meeting in
some of these contested states, such as Georgia for example,
and they will be casting their votes for president and
vice president. And as far as I understand it, both
sets of these votes will be set to Congress, and
(38:11):
Congress will get them and react to them on January sixth,
so we'll see what happens up. Before I move on,
I want to comment on Time magazine. Yes, I know
no one pays any attention to Time magazine anymore. Used
to be the standard dentist's waiting room magazine, and now
(38:32):
you don't even have a dentists waiting room magazine. I
noticed the last time I went to the dentist during
the COVID thing. Because of the COVID, they don't have
the magazines in the dentist's waiting room in case Time
magazine has got the COVID all over it and you
pick it up, so you've allowed there's one person in
the waiting room at any one time. That's it. And
(38:53):
you don't get to read any infected copies of Time magazine.
But Time magazine No one cares about it except at
the end of each year, when everyone still makes a
big fuss about all time. Who's going to be Times
Person of the years? They say Person of the Year,
non binary person of the year, Who's going to be
Time's person. It's the only thing left that anyone cares
(39:14):
about with Time magazine, And even that is boring as hell,
because this year they went and picked Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris and they've got and that really sums up
the world we live in. What did Joe Biden do
in twenty twenty He spent it in his basement and
that was still enough to get him made Times Man
(39:37):
of the Year, which is incredible. Now you can say
what you like about Time Magazine, but there was a
generally speaking for the turbulent years of the twentieth century,
Time Magazine's Man of the Year actually was if you
just named them, you'd get a sense of the great
currents of history coursing through our lives. Gandhi Hitler, Stalin Churchill.
(40:08):
No one would seriously dispute the impact on history of
those persons. Joe Biden is a sock puppet, and Kamala
Harris is the slightly more sophisticated sock puppet that they're
lining up to take over from Joe Biden, which looks
like it's going to be happening sooner rather than later.
(40:28):
One reason Hunter Biden. The Biden campaign itself announced that
Hunter Biden was being investigated for by the Department of
Justice for tax reasons. That in itself is an odd
thing because when when you hear that somebody's having their
taxes investigated, usually it means the IRS are looking looking
(40:51):
into it, and sometimes that becomes public and it can
be a bit embarrassing as it is if you've I
think there was a big Republican big shot in New
Hampshire and it merged that the IRS had a lean
on her house or something. It can be. It's usually
when you hear someone's being investigated for taxes, it's usually
(41:12):
by the IRS. They're after you for the money, like
with Willie Nelson or whoever. It's a slightly different thing
when the Department of Justice is investigating you for tax reasons,
because then it's a criminal matter. And so presumably the
reason the Biden campaign revealed that is because there is
worse to come. In other words, that there's that. In fact,
(41:36):
what is at some point going to be revealed is
a more is more dramatic, a criminal investigation. And that's
why the Biden campaign made it look like Hunter Biden
had just been doing a little under reporting on his taxes,
claiming a few too many deductions, that kind of thing
(41:59):
that came out so and the reason they did, And
what that tells me is that they're not going to
try and stick it out too long with Joe Biden.
At some point, sooner than expected, he's going to be
resigning and making way for Kamala to become the president.
(42:19):
And so I'm looking at this thing, you know, how
can this possibly be Times Man of the Year. There
is no question who is the Man of the year.
It is Chairman Gi, because it is Chairman Gie's world
and it is Chairman Gie's Yeah, you look at it.
You look at it from Chairman Gee's point of view.
(42:39):
Chairman Gi has just managed to get rid of the
one guy who in America who was willing to stand
up to him in a way that the great Washington Uniparty,
the geniuses at the Chamber of Commerce Wright who told
us that if we just have free trade with China.
(43:01):
Then China will get a taste for capitalism, and a
taste for capitalism will lead them toward a taste for liberty.
So if we trade with China, China will develop our
ideas on freedom and liberty and all the rest of it. Instead,
that hasn't happened, and instead we're developing Chinese idea. As
(43:25):
you can see on big Tech, on Twitter, on Facebook,
all the rest. Every day, we are developing Chinese ideas
on freedom of speech. We are accepting the idea of
permitted speech. That's what it is, this disinformation stuff. The
idea in China is that there is speech you are permitted,
and it doesn't necessarily mean that everything's totalitarian and clamped down.
(43:49):
You might be able to have differences of opinion. Who
sings the best version of walking in a winter wonderland?
They might, they might permit you to do that, but
they are clear on the lines of permitted speech and
not permitted speech. And increasingly Zuckerberg and Dorsey and these
(44:10):
evil men who run the big woke cartel of social
media operate in Chinese terms a land of permitted speech
and not permitted speech. So instead of China becoming more
like us, we're becoming more like China. That's one for
Chairman Gee, two for Chairman Gie. The only guy willing
(44:33):
to push back against that, the Democrat Party wasn't. The
Republican Party wasn't. The only guy was was Donald Trump.
And as we approached the end of twenty twenty, the
Chinese think they've taken out that guy and he's gone
and they don't have to worry about that anymore. Third,
(44:54):
they've had huge success penetrating every aspect of Western life.
And I don't mean by penetrating just fang fang sinking
her fang fangs into Eric Swalwell, because that is a
thankless task. And I don't care how well you get
paid for being a Chinese spy. There is no money
(45:16):
on earth that would persuade me to do that. But
that is actually extraordinary. Eric Swalwell is a joke to
most Republicans, and so we think this story is a joke.
But the fact is that she picked him out when
he was just some obscure San Francisco councilman, and he
wound up as a presidential candidate, and whatever you think
(45:41):
of that, that's kind of weird. And he got to
being a presidential candidate very quickly. And one reason he
did that is because she was his bundler. A bundle
is one of these people who collects a whole big
bunch of donations for a political campaigner and ties them
up all neatly with a big ribbon and hands him
(46:03):
all the money as a bundler. Again, it's interesting the
way all the checks and balances are a total joke.
As I mentioned on this show in connection with dominion
voting machines, it's illegal for a Canadian to give a
hundred bucks to a presidential candidate, but it's not illegal
for a Canadian company to run the voting systems in
thirty three states. Likewise, it's illegal for a Chinese national
(46:26):
to give a hundred bucks to a presidential candidate, but
it's not illegal for a Chinese spy, a Chinese national
to become the bundler for American political candidates. And so actually,
her bundling may well be the reason that he was
(46:48):
able to rise so fast and become a presidential candidate.
So again, Chairman, cheese world, we just live in it.
And finally, Chairman, she pulls off the ultimate. He not
only gets rid of the one guy who was prepared
to stand up to him. He replaces him with a
(47:09):
Chinese bag man. That's what Joe Biden is. Joe. By
you think of everything we now know from Hunter Biden's laptop,
about ten percent for the big guy in everything. Think
of it this way. If you follow the Hunter Biden's
story and most Americans don't, you know certain things about
(47:31):
the Biden crime syndicate, that's what they are. They're all
in it together. As in that email from Hunter Biden
that's just been disclosed in which he says, oh, by
the way, I'd like keys to this office of his
Chinese front company. I'd like keys also for Joe Biden,
(47:52):
Jill Biden, Jim Biden. They're all in it together. They're
all in it together. And and so whatever we even
if you're as up on this story as as anybody is.
Whatever you know, whatever you've read from Hunter Biden's laptop,
Chairman GI knows more. He's got more on Joe Biden
(48:15):
than anybody has. And he's gonna he's gonna leverage that.
Chairman gis all and just a capital yes. And then
Chairman Gi managed to unfortunately entirely by accident, just by
closing Wuhan Airport to any domestic flights to the rest
of China, but keeping it open to the rest of
(48:37):
the world, so you can't fly from Wuhan to Shanghai
or Beijing, but you can fly from Wuhan to Rome
and Paris and London and New York. He managed to
infect the entire planet and take down the Western economy
to the point where the so called free world now
(48:57):
accepts that the state has the right to tell you
when to leave the house, how many people you can
have in your house, whether you can be physically in
the company of persons not from your household. A chairman,
Gee has had the most fantastic year on every front.
He's the man of the year. And this ludicrous thing
(49:20):
of a person who won't even matter once they've told
him to resign in a few months time. This Joe
Biden guy. The idea that Joe Biden is Man of
the Year is preposterous. Mark signing for US one eight
hundred two eight two two eight eight two. We'll take
your calls straight ahead, Mark signing for US. Let's go
(49:42):
telephones and to Ken in Austin, Texas. Ken, it's great
to have you with us on the show Today. Market
is an absolute honor to speak with you, sir, Oh
come on, don't do you sound like Obama bowing before
the king of Saudi Arabia. Let's have none of that.
This is a Democrat, Democrat republic, democratic republic. Cat can
(50:05):
look at a king and all the rest of it's
what's how do you about? Ken? I think it's boils
down to, Mark, is that we're going to have to
face the fact that the United States of America made
a stupid decision elected this man to office. Joe Biden
is so pathetically obviously in the early stages of dementia.
There's also videos outshowing that he's a blatant, pathetic liar.
(50:28):
And this country rejected a man who's fully constituted, fully capable, articulate, strong,
and had nothing but good for this for this country.
That's what it boils down to, Mark. I'm sorry to
say that. Well. You know what's interesting though, is the media.
What are we talking about now? You and a half ago,
(50:50):
so basically when Biden launched his campaign, they were doing
these stories on how, oh we all love Joe, but
maybe he's lost the step. He's not the o Biden
of twenty twelve or nineteen seventy two or whenever it was.
And then when they decided, they sort of all reached
a consensus that the other guys were two left wing
(51:13):
or they were going nowhere, and that they were just
going to COVID gave them an opportunity to put a
guy in office who wasn't actually up to campaigning, never
mind governing, and they just decided to go for it. Now,
suddenly there are all these stories about cognitive decline back
in the news, Ken did you see that thing they're
(51:33):
doing an a about Diane Feinstein? Did you see that?
The it was of the Weekend? I didn't. It was
very interesting. They're all there's all these stories about how
Diane Feinstein, who I guess is eighty five, eighty seven
or something, is in cognitive decline and they all want
to get rid of her now. And basically, yeah, basically
(51:56):
the Democrats want to get rid of her. And basically
it's because she hugged Lindsey Graham b she wasn't beastly
enough to Amy Coney Barrett. And see she said she
wasn't in favor of court packing. So basically, if you're
not left wing enough that's now a sign of cognitive
decline and hey something Mark, To be honest with you,
(52:19):
I would like to see the FBI get a hold
of those You mentioned the dominion voting machines in your monologue,
and I would love to see the FBI get a
hold of those voting machines, get into those machines, get
into the parameters of those machines to see if in fact,
there were algorithms set in those machines to take away
(52:40):
votes from Donald Trump. That is a possibility. Yeah, I
don't think, I think honestly, once you've got widespread machine voting,
and then once you have widespread foreign machine voting such
as Canadian machines, and then once you have wide spread
foreign machine voting where they're susceptible to algorithms from software
(53:07):
that comes from who knows where, then then you're not
really dealing in anything that the founding fathers would recognize
as an election. But you do you know, That's that's
the point, Ken, this is, this is one of those
brilliantly set up situations. The COVID enabled an election thought
(53:29):
on terms that are not like anything else in American
history at all. And then and then so that meant
that gave them a pretext for having the most fraud
prevalent kind of voting, which is mail in voting, which
worked hugely to the Democrat's advantage, and then it enabled
(53:50):
them to put in again, it's not even a Democrat
thing because you look on Biden as a sock puppet
who's ultimately waggling the sock puppet. And you look at
and you look at all this stuff from Hunter Biden's laptop,
You look at these emails, you look at Hunter flying
to on Air Force two to Beijing. That the great
(54:10):
the great thing here now is you know, if everyone
thinks O Kamala is going is being set up to
take over as if she's something in our own right, No,
she's just some sock puppet too. This is this is
the problem here. But the cognitive decline thing I find
interesting Ken because the fact that they brought it up
with Diane Feinstein all of a sudden means they're trying
(54:33):
to sort of inject it as part of the political discussion,
Oh do we really need all these really elderly people
and gosh, we all love them and they awfully nice
ten twenty thirty seventy years ago, but maybe they're a
little bit past it now. They're they're trying to set up.
The reason they're doing it with Diane Feinstein now, poor
old Gal, is that they're trying to put it injected
(54:56):
into the political conversation so it can be used against
Joe Biden when they want him to step aside for
Kamala whenever that comes. And the fact that they're doing
it to dify right now or Ken, I think means
that Joe Biden, I'm not saying he's who was it.
It was William Henry Harrison I think was the guy
(55:19):
who was I'm not saying it's going to be quite
that short a presidency, but it's going to be. It's
not going to be much longer than that. It's not
on Facebook page I said, would you allow a men
who's in dementia to drive a bus? Would you allow
a man to who has dementia to fly a jet
with two or three hundred passengers on board? Why would
(55:40):
you elect a man with dementia to the president of
United States? It's crazy. Yeah. The difference is that the
guy driving the bus, Ken, he's actually there all on
his own. The presidents this. This guy is basically just
a puppet being waggled around, and the thing is to
figure out who it is who's actually do the wagling around.
(56:00):
Thank you for your call. That was a great point.
Good good calls today, interesting questions with interesting perspectives. One
eight hundred and two two two eight eight two is
the number to call mark Stein in for Rush. Rush
hopes to be back tomorrow, and we do two. We
(56:21):
would all much rather Rush was in this chair back
in a moment, right, yes, mister s Nurdley, yep, Oh,
Miss mister Surly wants to know if if there are
required COVID tests to come on the mark Steine Cruise
(56:43):
and required vaccines. I don't know about. I'm really hoping.
I initially hope the Markstein Cruise sails in October and
we're going to a lot of great places. We got
a lot of great people on the cruise. We got
John O'Sullivan. Actually, Rush, I might play this clip in
the next hour sometime because John O'Sullivan. Rush was talking
(57:05):
about John O'Sullivan's first law A couple of days ago.
John O'Sullivan was one of missus Thatcher's aids and came
up with the theorem that any organization or institution that
is not explicitly right wing becomes left wing over time,
(57:26):
and you can certainly see that as Rush was saying,
in today's Republican Party. He's going to be on the cruise.
And Conrad Black, who was a guest on this show
with Russia a couple of weeks back lots, and Michelle Backman,
the Great Michelle Backman. She does comedy sketches with me
on the mark Stein Cruise. You can go to Markstein
Cruise dot com and see that old mister missus Missus
(57:49):
Snurdley wants to know whether I'm gonna I'm gonna sing,
because he's already thinking a jump it overboard. I do. Actually,
I sing my song fore Biden. I have a little
Joe Biden's song I sing and you'll enjoy it live.
I'm going to I'm not going to do it because
I'm still hoping that Joe Biden is not going to
(58:10):
be a president elect for much longer. Take that however
you want, but there might be a bit of that,
and you can find out more by earn to mark
Stein Cruise dot com. Mister Snurdley was saying to me
by the way, he mentioned Acorn TV. I don't know
whether you've seen this. I think it's an app you
can get or whatever. You can subscribe to it, and
(58:32):
it's basically like a Netflix for British Commonwealth countries. And
I wound up I think, I'm not quite sure how
I wound up getting it, but it's got TV from
the UK, Australia, New Zealand and so forth. It's got
some rather gritty Irish dramas that I find kind of
(58:54):
quite I'm quite partial to. But the one thing I
liked about it was the all the legal drama. When
I was very busy with American court cases, and I
came home every evening hating, absolutely loathing the judges I
had the misfortune to be up against, and and the sleazy,
(59:16):
incompetent lawyers and all the rest of it. And I
quite like watching these Australian legal dramas. In particular. I
found it very reassuring when you've been in an American
court case. I was deposed a few last year. I
think it was by a lawyer in jeans, and I
remarked to him that I'd never been deposed by a
lawyer wearing jeans before and I've found myself missing all
(59:38):
the whigs and the gowns and all the rest of it.
And so I just started watching all these Australian legal dramas.
But mister Snurdley, have you seen the one that's out
there on Acorn TV called Rake. It's it's about it.
It's a it's about a rather dissolute Australian barrister. And
I learned things from that, and actually he paid off
(01:00:00):
for me in a recent legal case. Yeah, you can
give you. The thing about watching legal dramas is you
can pick up good legal advice. And in this case,
in this Australian one, Rake, he actually he at one point,
a very eminent man about Sydney, a video cassette or
(01:00:22):
DVD or whatever it is emerges of him and his
wife engaging in bestiality. And of course the Crown, the prosecutor,
I guess the DA or whatever you'd say here, the
US attorney, the Crown is going to show this bestiality
(01:00:42):
DVD to the jury and in the trial. And his
lawyers are horrified by this because they figure that once
the jury has seen this, they'll they'll vote to convict
this guy. He's Sam it's Sam Neil who's in Jurassic Park,
and you know him. He's a great New Zealand acts
(01:01:08):
he was in Jurassic Park. And so they the guy,
the the barrister says at one point, you know, he's
watching this tape of the best reality and he goes,
you know, after the fifth or sixth time, it's not
quite so shocking anymore. Maybe the trick is to just
(01:01:28):
play it over and over and over and over again
until the jury, you know, is so bored by it
it's no longer disgusted by it. And so you cut
to the court case and they're the court room. They're
all there in wigs, and the lawyer is going, the
barrister is going. Now, if we go to frame three
(01:01:49):
hundred and eighty, you can see that the dog still
seems to be enjoying himself. His tail is still waggings.
And they're absolutely right. The jury is bored by it
and no longer shocked by it. And that's actually a
great legal insight that I use to quite effect, to
very good effect, over a supposedly damaging email in a
(01:02:14):
court case I had the misfortune to be involved in.
So my view is, you know, you could always learn
quite a lot from those kinds of shows, and actually
it's one of it's one of the things that is
a great lesson in life. Nothing is shocking for that long.
So in other words, you can't expect people to be
(01:02:36):
mad about something if you've been talking about it over
and over and over and over, because there's a law
that kicks in. The more you talk about it, how
shocking it is, the less shocking it becomes. So if
you're going to act on the shock value something, you
got to act quickly because it's only going to be
shocking for a bit. The shock fades and then you're
(01:02:58):
just talking about it. And we know that things that
ought to be shocking, like the monkeying and the interference
in an American election by the FBI and other powerful
state agencies in twenty sixteen twenty seventeen, is no longer
shocking because we've been talking about it for four years,
(01:03:19):
so it's no longer shocking. And I think that's actually
one of the big problems with the situation where we're
in here now. I wanted before I forget, I want
to play something that Rush said the other day, because
it made a lot of noise correctly made a lot
of noise because it's a very big point. And this
(01:03:40):
is Rush responding to mister Snurdley on the subject of secession.
So Snurdley says, do you every think we're gonna win?
And I said, I actually think and I've referenced this.
I've alluded to this a couple of times because I've
seen others allude to this, and I've seen quite a
(01:04:01):
few people allude to this over the course of the
recent months, maybe six months, I said, I think we
could be trending towards secession. Now that's not the answer
mister Snerdley thought he was going to get. I said,
I see more and more people asking what in the
(01:04:22):
world do we have in common with people who disagree
with us? Where's the overlap? And you know that I've
referenced this. How many times have I asked you? What
is the overlap? What is it that people on the
left people on the right? Is there an overlap? Is
there anything we have in common? And it doesn't look
like there is. When you talk about how can make
(01:04:44):
America great again be controversial? The fact that make America
great again is controversial, and Ryle's people up should tell
you all you need to know about how much we
have in common. And then I mentioned that I have
seen I don't know how many people responsible people. I
haven't named any names here, but they're certainly not hiding
(01:05:04):
behind their comments. I've seen it written on Twitter. I've
seen it written on various blogs, hot Air, power Line.
How distant and separated, how much more separated our culture
is becoming politically, And I've seen people speculate that there
cannot be a peaceful coexistence of two completely different theories
(01:05:26):
of life, theories of government, theories of how we manage
our affairs, That we can't be in this dire a
conflict without something giving somewhere along the way, and that
I reiterated that I know that there's a sizable and
growing sentiment for people who believe that we're headed, whether
(01:05:49):
we want to get there or not, toward recession. Now,
I didn't advocate for it. I never would advocate for secession.
I'm simply repeating what I have heard now. I was
absolutely fascinated when Rush said that a couple of days ago,
toward the end of last week, and I've got a
(01:06:11):
comment on it. Rush is interesting because the last couple
of days. He's been talking really big picture. He's been
looking at doing the thirty thousand foot view of where
this is all going. And I want to pick up
on what he said in just a moment Mark Stein
in for USh, I just want to go back to
(01:06:32):
that clip I played a rush talking about secession and
the line he said, what in the world do we
have in common? Which is what always leads people to
succeeded Thomas Jefferson's words that should have been put in
the Declaration of Independent I think they were in there
(01:06:55):
right up until the final draft, so the penultimate draft
where he where he regretted the break with Mother England
and he said, we might have been a great and
free people together, and he felt that what they had
in common was no longer enough to bind them. And
(01:07:16):
this is what's so unusual about the American situation, because
normally when people breaks, it's for much more basic reasons
than that. You know, the organizing principle of nation states
in Europe is that the Swedes are in Sweden because
(01:07:37):
their Swedes, and the Danes are in Denmark because their Danes.
And the one great multi ethnic empire, the Habsburg Empire,
was broken up at the end of the First World War,
in part at the behest of Woodrow Wilson, who believed
in self determination, where he thought coherent groups should have
(01:07:58):
their own country, which is how the Habsburg Empire wound
up being wrapped up and all these states such as
Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia emerging out of that, and then they
broke up because in the end there wasn't enough to
bind Serbs and Bosniak Muslims together. And again even within
(01:08:21):
much smaller within the British Isles, for example, Irish Catholics
and Irish Protestants have a different view on the basis
of religion. And even in Canada Quebecas, a large number
of Francophone Quebecas want their own country, not because they
want to do things differently from Canada. They want to
(01:08:45):
leave Canada to set up a country that would be
just like Canada in terms of big government and all
the rest of it. It's just that because they speak
a different language, they don't feel they're the same people
as English Canadians. And what's fascinating about the American situation
is it's purely political. It's the triumph of politics. What
(01:09:06):
rush is talking about is the triumph of politics that
we do not have anything in common because it's not
like Swedes and Norwegians, it's not like Bosniacs and Serbs.
It's not like Anglophone Canadians and Quebec Francophones. It's purely
(01:09:27):
you have one. You have one, unified polity that in
now has made politics so all consuming that it's dividing
people on the on the b on purely ideological grounds.
I remember years ago a friend of mine, we were
(01:09:48):
it was just before a UK election. I think this
would be, you know, one of those elections where the
Conservatives were in danger of losing to Labor and so
they're all these things you always get where the celebrities
like I think Michael Caine and other types that were
saying they'd have to leave the country if the Labor
Party got in because of tax rates. And my American
(01:10:10):
friend was laughing at this. He was saying, it was
incredible to imagine conditions. You know, he was a Republican Conservative,
but he was laughing and he was saying it was
incredible to imagine conditions in which he would have to
consider leaving the country if the opposing party were elected,
and now we're in that, and we're in that over
things like identity politics, wherein that over all this uh,
(01:10:37):
you know, they basically over the politicization of everything, which
which is again an incredible situation, not like anywhere else
on the planet. And then again you have it compounded
by the fact that geographically the majority of the country
and you know, there are people who say, oh, I'm
(01:10:57):
not interested, don't start me on this. It should just
be the popular vote, straight up, straight down, in which
case a bunch of blue cities would outvote the red
hinter lands and it would be Democrat politicians in perpetuity.
But life doesn't work like that. So if you'd simply
just break it down a county level and you look
at the map, it's whatever, it is, eighty percent of
(01:11:20):
the country is red and twenty percent is blue, and
you cannot And again you then get to the federal
aspect that this might survive if there was a proper
respect for federalism, but there isn't really. Increasingly because a
mass media and other things, things are being done at
a centralized level, not quite as centralized as France or
(01:11:44):
other states that have no regard for decentralization, but things
are becoming ever more centralized, and that puts there's no
inclination on the part of the twenty percent that's blue
to let the eighty percent that's read live their own lives.
And that's why I think Rush is whatever Rush thinks
(01:12:08):
about it, he said he would never advocate for secession.
I don't know how you'd do it, and I'm not
it would be it would always be messier than you think.
But there is simply a lot of people do not
recognize the legitimacy of the present regime. And it's and
again the important point to bear in mind. Here's what's
(01:12:32):
interesting about it. What's different about it is that the
Democrats have finally had their way. They have so politicized
every single aspect of life. You can't read the gardening
column in a newspaper without a snare against Trump, and
sometimes even Trump voters. I mean, they hated Bush, but
(01:12:53):
they gave a pass to his voters. Now it's not
just the Republican president they despise. They despise those who vote,
and you get it shoved down your throat in the
cooking shows, in the gardening shows, on the sports networks,
the Democrats of triumph. They've politicized every aspect of life.
And one consequence in that is to go back to
(01:13:15):
what Rush said in that clip. We no longer have
sufficient in common to hold us together. Mark Stein for Rush.
We have lots more to come, Mark Stein in for Rush.
In this season of ADVENTURER, a little under two weeks
away from Christmas Day, Rush is feeling a little better
(01:13:38):
than he did on Friday, and we are very hopeful
that the Great Man is going to be back with
us tomorrow. In the meantime, this is Mark Stein on Rush,
lots more still to come. Hey, great to be with you.
America's anchor man is and this is your undocumented an command,
(01:14:03):
Mark Stein. As you know, I'm a foreign exchange student
at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies. I was
sent here by my government to sleep with Eric Swalwell.
IM not going to tell you how that mission is
going in any detail. I would like to make a
(01:14:27):
general point, though, regardless of sleeping with Eric Swalwell. It's
interesting all these there's a there appears to be a
level of penetration of the Democrat Party in the San
Francisco area by China as you know, Diane Feinstein was
(01:14:50):
driven around town. Again, it's one of these stories that
doesn't go anywhere. It comes up and it's reported for
a bit. It's like gets a mention on a BC, CBS,
NBC SO and and then somehow from the head office's
head officer's head office a memo comes down reminding them
that ABC, CBS, NBC, etc. All part of these big
(01:15:15):
global entertainment complexes that are deeply in bed with the Chinese.
And the story doesn't go anywhere. So it would usually
be a big deal if you'd had a Chinese spy
driving you around for twenty years, as Diane Feinstein did.
Now we then find that Fang Fang has been driving
(01:15:37):
so to speak, Eric Swollwell and managed to drive him
from being an obscure San Francisco City councilman to being
a presidential candidate who sits on the House Intelligence Committee.
And there is and this is a guy who has
always repeated the Beijing line and has been anxious to
(01:16:00):
we again we have over the weekend this suddenly, the
minute the Chinese thing came up, we get this story
purporting to demonstrate that the Russians have hacked into the
US Treasury Department, again an Eric Swolwell type thing, playing
up the Russians downplaying the Chinese. But they I think
there are credible grounds for thinking that there is some
(01:16:24):
kind of systemic penetration of San Francisco area Democrats by
Chinese operatives. And again we've had these leaked Chinese Communist
Party records showing that there are basically two million Chinese
Communist Party members who have been dispersed throughout the world
(01:16:52):
and are operating at high levels in UK, Australian, US companies, universities,
and actually in government missions, including actually in consulates. So
(01:17:12):
in other words, we have something like two million Chinese communities.
And as usual, there was nothing in the American papers
about this. God knows why that would be, but it
was in the Australian press. And this database which has
been leaked shows that Chinese Communist Party members these are
(01:17:34):
in other words, these aren't just when people are all
you're being racist, racist, racist about the Chinese. No, these
are actually Chinese Communist Party members who are actually in
employment in UK, Indian, New Zealand, South African, German, Swiss, Italian,
(01:17:54):
and US consulates in various parts of the World. Fang
Fang managed to plant an intern in Eric Swoolwell's office,
so I think there is there's some kind of systemic
chairman Gee penetration of the San Francisco area Democrat Party.
(01:18:18):
At the very minimum, Let's get a Chris on the
Russia Lin Bull Show. Chris, it's great to have you
with us on America's number one radio show. Chris is
in Alma, Michigan. Hi, Chris, I appreciate I appreciate you
taking the car. I got a lot of respect for
what your take is on things that I wanted to
get your take on. One thing. Looking forward to the
(01:18:40):
next four years with the Republican Party, I'm not optimistic
that they can continue the momentum that President Frump has
in the MAGA movement. And then, let's face it, he's
been the vision and everything else, and I think they're
gonna be fighting him in four years of the decided
to run. I wanted your opinion. I think he ought
(01:19:01):
to consider form of his own party, or at least
threatening to do that and force him to get behind him.
I don't trust them. Yeah, I don't trust them either.
I mean, basically, as much as we loathe the Democrats
for doing what they did to Trump in when he
came in in January twenty seventeen. As much of the
(01:19:24):
problem was Paul Ryan and Coe also actively obstructing his
agenda or just you know, wanting to have a kind
of tax cut party. Yeah, who knows what will happen
in twenty twenty four. Who knows whether any of us
will be here in twenty twenty four, Who knows whether
the Chinese will have done their EMP attack. So whatever
(01:19:44):
we say, it's going to be a very different scenario
in twenty twenty four. And that's why if he is
going to threaten to form his own party, the time
to do it is when he's at the peak of
his powers, which is now. And you know, I Sai
I said on this show a couple of weeks back
that I wasn't going to go back to that old
(01:20:05):
Republican party. You know, I'll do what is necessary. Yeah,
in Georgia, make sure you get out and vote and
drag Leffler and Perdue across the finish line. But we
all know that Leffler and Purdue are not impressive characters
on board with the Trump agenda. And there's a there's
a Democrat base, there's a Trump base, and then there's
(01:20:28):
this squishy thing in the middle, which is the GOP base.
And I want, I think what's important is that the
Trump ideas and the Trump priorities, the things he particularly
the things he campaigned on in twenty sixteen, I want
them to survive and still to be part of the conversation.
(01:20:50):
And the danger is, particularly if the Republicans pick up
these win hold these two seats in Georgia, the danger
is is that the Republicans will think, hey, it's the
best of all worlds. Now we've gotten rid of Trump.
We can go back to the Trump the Republican Party
pre Trump, as it was in twenty fifteen. And I
(01:21:12):
ain't going to go along with that because it wasn't
enough for me. And I want something more than that.
And the thing that we all need to think about now,
including the President, because it might well be time, and
it might well be time to form his own party
and at least have it there as a placeholder, because
(01:21:34):
it's very difficult to form parties in America. There's a
lot of obstacles to it that are put in your
way process obstacles by the States. But it would be
interesting for him to just form his own party. Say
I'm just saying this is a suggestion to the president,
but to form his own party that exists to preserve
(01:21:58):
the ideas he ran successfully on twenty sixteen, and for
it just to be sitting out there as a vehicle
if the Republican Party is tempted to go back to
the way it was five years ago, because I'm not
interested in that. It's not enough. And all it does
is ensure you know, you basically got a party that
(01:22:19):
wants to drive America off the cliff full Thlottle, which
is the Democrat plan. And that's an honorable position if
that's what you believe in as AOC, and the rest
of the gang do let's floor it and go sailing
off the cliff. And then you've got this week wishy
washy Republican Party that says, Okay, we're going to go
off the cliff in second or third gear, but you'll
(01:22:42):
get a corporate tax cut along the way. And that
party isn't of any great interest to me, and I
don't think any of any great interest to Donald Trump either,
And that's why, as you say, it might be, it
might be interesting for him to start just talking about
forming his own party now, Chris Amen, I think everybody
(01:23:05):
that supports him, or the majority of them feel just
the way you you've expressed, and that's exactly the way
I feel. He's got the vision, he led them along
the right path. They're going to squander that and under
a year and a half they'll be back to the
old they're old you know, policies and approaches, and it's
just going to be a waste. Yeah, you you, you're
(01:23:29):
right now. I don't want this last four years to
have been a waste, and I particularly don't want I'll
never forget that. Actually going to Trump rallies and there
were a lot of laughs. There were a lot of laughs,
big laughs. He's a funny guy, and people were laughing.
But there were also people with tears in their eyes
because for the first time in years, someone was talking
(01:23:51):
about something that mattered to them. And I won't forget.
I won't forget that. Whatever whatever happens on January sixth
or twentieth, or however long of this hellish, peaceful transition
of power we got to go through, I won't forget that.
And people want a bigger choice, They don't want a
(01:24:12):
pseudo choice. In Austria in the post war period, for
most of the postwar period, you had a choice between
a left of center party and a mildly right of
left of center party, and whichever one you voted for,
they governed in coalition anyway. And that's basically what American
(01:24:33):
politics degenerated into pre Trump. And all it means is
that you have this left left wing ratchet effect. You
go fast. When you have someone in Obama like Obama
in office, the left wing ratchet effect advances fairly spectacularly.
And all that happens then when you have the right
(01:24:53):
in so called power. They're not really empower them in office,
but they're not in power, is that they arrest the
rat should effect. So you don't drift left quite as
fast as you do under the Democrats. But if you
actually want to reverse it, you've got to have more
than the Republican Party, the pre Trump Republican Party. I'm
(01:25:16):
not going back to that. Thank you a call, Chris.
It's great to have you with us on the show.
And keep the faith, as it says on the front
page of this month's Limball letter, keep the faith. This
is the most important thing now people have got to
bottom line this, whatever happens, don't go back, don't go
(01:25:37):
back to that pre Trump Republican party. Keep the issues
he ran on five years ago. Keep him in play,
Keep him in play. He was the only one at
that time, five years ago when he came down that escalator,
people thought, oh yeah, wait a minute, this guy is
suddenly talking about things that impact my life. Keep that,
(01:25:58):
keep that in play. The never trumpers again. I'll tell
you what. Let's let's hold that thought and I'll play
you what Rush was saying on that theme just a
couple of days ago, mark Stein in for Rush. We
got more to cup mark Stein in for Rush in
this season of advent? Is it my imagination? Are we? Uh?
(01:26:23):
Do we? We do? We usually play the Mannheim Steamroller
by by this time in the Christmas season, Mike, are
we starting it? A little later? It was, oh, oh, okay, okay,
I'll well well, holding off of the mad Him steam Roll.
I'm in the moood for God, rest you Berry, gentleman,
(01:26:45):
because I would like to be able to rest me
a little merrier than I am at the moment. Anyway,
I mentioned John O'Sullivan. I've known John for years We've
worked together at many places where John was an aid
to missus Match in the UK, and then he edited
National Review when it was somewhat more sound than it
(01:27:07):
is today. And I've worked with John at the Daily
Telegraph in London and the Nashville Post and Calendar Canada.
He's a great guy, Johnny beyond the Marksneine cruise. But
Rush was talking about him just the other day in
this context, do you remember the name John O'Sullivan. John
O'Sullivan is a former ad to Lady Thatcher in the UK.
(01:27:31):
He was editor at National Review under William F. Buckley
for the longest time. I'm looking for the quote that
I want to attribute to him. I can do it myself,
but I want to find the exact quote, but it's
buried here somewhere. The bottom line is this. He came
(01:27:54):
up with the O'Sullivan theorem, and it is this organization,
any group of people that is not exclusively explicitly conservative
every day will eventually become liberal. That's the natural flow,
(01:28:18):
that's the natural tendency. Conservatism, in other words, is a
daily commitment. Conservatism is a daily commitment to its principles
and ideals. It's a commitment every day to make as
much of your life and your business and whatever conservative
in values as you can, because if that doesn't happen,
(01:28:40):
you or your organization, your company, your club, whatever, will
eventually become liberal. And it's true. And that's where we
are now. We have the Republican Party in significant membership,
significant parts of it not seeing the threat, or if
they see it, not wishing to acknowledge it, and if
(01:29:03):
they do not actively support, advance, explain promote conservatism on
a daily basis, that they will become liberal. They will.
They will gradually lose whatever it is about them that
are conservative or that is conservative, and many of them
are not that conservative anymore anyway. Yeah, and Russia is
(01:29:25):
absolutely right on that's but that is the challenge you
have to You're being pushed in a direction, as he says,
unless you actually every morning, oh I'm conservative. We got
to stay conservative. Every institution just transtends to drift left
and we assume that people can withstand it. So for example,
(01:29:50):
you can We used to just complain about universities, that
it was universities where you get into the social engineering
and the left wing nonsense, and then it became high
school and middle school. Basically, now the social the left
wing indoctrination starts in kindergarten, So you're expecting your kid
to survive whatever it is, twelve thirteen grades of that,
(01:30:12):
and then it's going to be another ten grades, however
long they take to complete their bachelors in transgender and
Colonial studies or their you know, their PhDs in transgender
and Colonial studies, so that they can be addressed as doctor,
like doctor Jill Biden all their lives or whatever, and
you've got to she's a doctor of education, which is
(01:30:33):
a joke. That's the other thing. There's a survey saying
quite correctly that being a doctor of education doesn't actually
approve your ability to teach people, which you should be
no news to anybody. There's about ensuring the complete Basically,
it's about ensuring complete ideological compliance. That's the world we
live in. Liberal world, left wing world. The air you breathe.
(01:30:57):
If you have a kid, you go to kindergarten and
they start telling you about climate change, the planet's going
to fry. You've got to watch the al Gore movie.
And so from the moment you first go down the
hill to get on that little yellow school bus, and
be driven down to the grade school in the village.
That's the point at which you start getting immersed in
(01:31:21):
left wing world. Right from then you're five years old
and you first venture out to go to kindergarten. Yeah,
and even in red states we all know this. The
education systems in red states are deep blue education systems.
And Rush is correct in that that you will eventually
(01:31:41):
unless you explicitly dedicate yourself to conservative values. And this
is what we need to give thought to in the
years ahead. You can't lose for stut We've lost politics.
We lost everything else. We lost the academy, we lost
the movies. He lost the mainline churches, like all the
(01:32:03):
gay bishops in the Episcopal Church and all that. And
eventually you come down to, well, we can still drag
people over the finish line every Tuesday in November when
we need to. No, we lost that too, And as
we just saw four years ago, we needed somebody beyond
that to be able to We needed somebody from the
(01:32:25):
world beyond that Trump to be able to just smash
through and be heard. Trump was able to say the
things he said in part because he wasn't just some
political guy. He was known he already had name recognition,
he already had brand recognition and all that kind of nonsense,
(01:32:46):
and so he had a license to say things, to
raise subjects, to start talking about immigration in ways that
so called more mainstream Republican candidates couldn't. And that's the
force that was required four or five years ago just
to be able to get a Republican candidate out there
(01:33:07):
who could even talk in meaningful ways about bad issues
about those issues. Rushes thing is, Rushes thing is absolutely right.
You know, if the Republican Party just wants to be
the drift along party, just wants to be the drift
along party, then it means we have to work. We
have to work really hard to pull it back to Sanada. Yeah,
(01:33:33):
great to be with you. You know, the Internal Revenue
Service does not take a break for the holidays. They
don't shut down between Thanksgiving and Christmas. They would like
nothing better than to use boxing day to box you
in and box you up. So, if you're contending with
(01:33:56):
an IRS issue, Rush has the best advice you know.
Being in debt to the IRS can be stifling, folks.
People in this situation will tell you every day is
a waiting game. Every day is a nail biter. You
know you're gonna you're gonna get harshly worded letters from them.
(01:34:16):
You're gonna probably got a big penalty from the IRS.
Your intentions of getting squared away or there. But you
don't have the money, and you've you've you've heard how
tough the IRS can be, and you just really don't
know what to do. And it's true. The IRS is
the most powerful collection agency in the world. It's only
a matter of time before they find you. A lot
(01:34:38):
of people think, Hey, I'm small fry. They don't owe
that much money. They'll not even notice me. No, it's
exactly the small fry. They notice. There's so many more
small fry than there are wealthy people. Like Willie Suton said,
you're gonna rob a bank, go to where the banks
aren't going to, where the money is the IRS. If
you're gonna raise taxes, raise taxes on the middle class,
that's where the money is. IRS. You're gonna audit people,
(01:35:00):
audit the middle class. Look, this all happened to a
guy in this audience. His name is John, and he
had one serious setback after another when the IRS caught
up with him. There was no one to explain the
family emergencies he was contending with, and they didn't care.
They can't care about stuff like that. So John here
(01:35:21):
was faced with a lean on his bank account. Other
IRS actions made it difficult for him professionally. So instead
of trying to explain all of these circumstances to the
I R as remember he's a listener here, he called
Optima Tax Relief and that it's a free phone call
changed his life. As soon as he called them, their professionalism,
(01:35:44):
their knowledge how to deal with the IRS took over,
and he immediately felt a sense of calm. Finally somebody
knew what they were doing, that he had confidence in
all of that. After just one phone call, he knew
he was in the hands of some real prose. Optima
negotiated a deal that allowed him to resolve forty thousand
dollars in tax debt on terms he could live with,
(01:36:06):
terms he could afford truth as he wished. He had
called them sooner. If you have outstanding IRS issues, no
matter what they are, call America's number one most trusted
tax relief firm, Optima Tax Relief. They have resolved a
billion dollars of tax debt already and favorably for their clients.
(01:36:27):
Here's the number eight hundred nine seven three seven seven
hundred debts, eight hundred nine seven three seventy seven hundred
Optima tax relief. They know how to talk to the irs.
Let them do it for you. The Rushlimbo Show on
the Excellence in Broadcasting Network. The man himself is feeling
(01:36:50):
a little better today than he was on Friday, and
he hopes to be back in the Attila the chair tomorrow.
As we do. Let us go to Jeff in Central Hall, Pennsylvania. Jeff,
great to have you with us. Thank you, Mark, Merry Christmas,
Happy New Year, and best wishes to Rush. I've been
(01:37:13):
listening to you and finally got around to the point
that I was going to bring up that there are
upwards of seventy four million people who are willing to
keep Trump's ideals alive. But I think we need some guidance,
some direction, something tangible that we can do. While I'm
(01:37:35):
not giving up on the court cases, I think they've
become somewhat quixotic and we need to be looking what
is the NEPs next step? Where do we go from here? Yeah,
I think that's what we're all having to think about,
and I think we will want some leadership for that.
As you say, there's seventy five million Americans who do
(01:38:00):
not well. Basically, the polls all show, including a percentage
of Democrats. I think the last pole I saw said
that something like ten to fifteen percent of Democrats did
not think this had been a fair election, and it's
eighty percent of Republicans. So, in fact, this is an
astonishing thing. We have an illegitimate regime, a regime that
(01:38:23):
is perceived as illegitimate by getting on for close to
half the electorate. Now, how is he gonna How would
Biden govern in that? If you're in any normal situation,
you'd recognize that it was all a bit dodgy, and
you'd be anxious to reach across the island all the
rest of it. Instead, I saw that the Biden dogs.
(01:38:46):
Biden's got two dogs, and they have their own Instagram feed,
and over the weekend they instagrammed out a picture of
the two dogs tearing apart a Trump stuffy. So, in
other words, instead of reaching across the aisle, the two
Biden dogs are savaging the previous president. There's not going
(01:39:07):
to be any unity, There's not going to be and
this is the difference. Now. What we have to do
is to get is to get real about it, which
is difficult because mostly the silent majority is content to
stay silent, not because it doesn't like to stay say anything,
but because, unlike many of the people on the other side,
we have real jobs, not make work jobs at universities
(01:39:31):
where they give you free time to go out and
riot and loot and rampage and all the rest of it,
but where you're going to get up in the morning
and go to work and you don't want to riot
and loot and rampage because you're destroying the system that
basically supports your life. But we have got to have
I think civil disobedience at the very minimum. I think
(01:39:53):
a cold recognition that this was not a respectable election
and he was not elected in that sense because too
much is known and it will all dribble out. Secondly,
I think I think the president has nothing to lose
by actually taking leadership in effect, not of simply the
(01:40:17):
Republican Party as it exists, but by taking leadership of
a force, of a more basic force than that which
is the people who got him elected, which is basically
working class, blue collar voters in those rust belt states,
the ones who who provided his margin of victory, and
(01:40:40):
ensuring that their issues aren't forgotten. The thing we mustn't do, Jeff,
is just to say, oh, well, better luck next time.
We've got a lot of better luck next time, Republicans.
And actually, if Leffler and Perdue get elected on January sixth,
if they survive and they're back in the Senate, they'll
become better luck next time Republicans. He'll say, well, it
(01:41:01):
all just went a bit south for us, but better
luck in twenty twenty two, twenty twenty four. As long
as elections are fought on the basis of this system,
the Democrats will never go back to the way it
was before. They're going to keep the COVID and the
fear going. We're now hearing, oddly enough, a lot of
people saying, oh, well, you know, we're going to have
(01:41:23):
to keep some of these COVID measures in place through
early twenty twenty two. By next month, it'll be late
twenty twenty two, which means they'll be running the midterm
elections under these same rules of mail in ballots. So
we got to have we've got to have probably not
the president, but somebody slightly to the side of him
(01:41:46):
running a campaign for electoral reform and clean elections, and
we also have a far more will also have to
have a far more determined commitment to free speech. So,
for example, if we have who are just getting bounced
and canceled and vaporized, then everybody is going to have
to stand If your friend gets canceled. If you're like
(01:42:09):
this guy Epstein and you and you say I don't
think doctor Jill Biden should be calling herself doctor Jilbiden,
and that is enough to get you canceled at this college,
then I'm sorry. Get you taken down from that college website,
then I'm sorry. But all those pansy professors with tenure,
you've got to stand up, and you've got to In
(01:42:31):
other words, each little setback cannot be allowed to proceed.
They're going to be serious about locking down freedom of
speech in imposing Chinese standards of freedom of speech, so
we won't even be able to argue for our position.
In the weeks before the election, we had an extraordinary situation, Jeff,
(01:42:52):
where the President's press secretary, Kaylee mcinaney, was shut down
on Twitter. So we've got to have at the very minimum. Okay,
I'll help you, Leffler and Perdue. I'll help drag you
across the finish line in Georgia on January sixth. But
in return, I would like a commitment to break up
these these this woke, big woke, big social, the big
(01:43:19):
tech cartel that's already more powerful than countries. So who
cares what the electoral system is because basically big tech
determine everything. So I want a commitment from Leflan Perdu
to break up Facebook and YouTube and Google on antitrust grounds.
That's the most important thing we could do, because otherwise
(01:43:40):
we're not even going to have a battle space in
which we can even talk about our issues. And that's
the most vital thing, you know, for a third of
a century on this show. And I can't tell you
how much I'm grateful to this man who has borne
this burden alone. Doesn't have any sugar daddy billionaires with
(01:44:02):
their own weird issues. He doesn't have any phonies like
the Koch brothers basically making common cause with Democrats when
it suits them, because because Trump has decided to cross
them on immigration issues or all the rest of it,
Rush just reports to Rush the Excellence in Broadcasting Network
(01:44:25):
that's not funded by George Soros, that's not funded by
Chairman g Rush reports to Rush. For all the years
he's been doing this, the Left has been saying Rush
is just saying this for the money. No, he doesn't
need any money, and he doesn't need to say it.
He says it because he believes it, and he doesn't
report to anybody. And we need more institutions than that
(01:44:50):
like that. And so what that means is that we
have to we have to keep pulling these guys to
the bare minimum, which is the bare minimum is we're
not going to win any more elections. If the twenty
twenty election system stays in place, you might as well
forget it. Elections won't matter, They won't matter at all.
(01:45:13):
The only reason why they don't bother stealing them in
certain states will be because those states are too read
so they won't be able to rent enough trucks to
drive the morning after ballot boxes to the count. But
otherwise they're going to start stealing everything they can steal.
So we got to have election reform, serious election reform,
(01:45:36):
in perpetuity, because we won't ever win any other elections
under this system with the mail in ballots. They're going
to keep the COVID going until twenty twenty two, as
they've said, so they can steal the midterms. And we've
got to act immediately if we hold the Senate. If
we hold the Senate, we have to act immediately to
(01:45:56):
break up big tech so that we can even talk
about these things. Jeff, you'right, it's time to get serious.
It's time to play hardball. I've said for years on
this show, I hate small ball conservatives. I loathe them.
And that's the situation. And that's the situation wherein the
small ball conservatives who think, oh, this isn't the hill
(01:46:17):
to die on, that isn't the hill to die on.
And then suddenly one morning, whatever it was, November seventh,
November the ninth, whenever the hell it was, you wake
up and you realize, oh, yeah, all those hills are
now held by Democrats. This is absolutely the hill to
die on. This election would if this was an election
(01:46:38):
held in Sudan, it would not have been certified by
the US State Department. It would not have been recognized
by the US State Department. Because everything that went on
in Georgia and Pennsylvania and Michigan. You couldn't do in
Sudan and expect the state Department to go along with it.
But when it happens in Georgia, Pennsylvania and Michigan, guys
(01:47:01):
like Bill bar just snare that it's the deposed king ranting.
So the important thing is the important thing is to
ensure that never again is there an election fought under
the twenty twenty rules. Otherwise you can forget about elections.
Thank you you Cale, Jeff, You are right, and it
is time to start moving on to you know how,
(01:47:24):
we're going to ensure that this doesn't happen again. Mark
Stein for Rush lots Mordica. Mark Stein in for Rush,
on America's number one radio show. You know I didn't
get to this story headline. Former aide says Chromo sexually
harassed her for years. This is Lindsay Boylan, who's a
(01:47:44):
Democrat candidate for a borough president in Manhattan, and she
says she knows that she is not the only woman
who has been sexually harassed by Governor Andrew Cuomo in
New York City. He make the most of these stories,
the whole me too thing, the whole difference in it.
(01:48:07):
They cover it. When there is a Republican in office,
this thing is going to go away. As you know
with Joe Biden himself, the big hair sniffer, the guy
who likes nothing more than lowering his nose into your quaffer.
Now we have a former aide saying that Cuomo sexually
harassed for years on end and knows she is not
(01:48:31):
the only one. You're not getting any of this coverage
in the media. Follow these stories because they're gonna squash
them with They're going to put a pillow over them
and suffocate these stories rather than cover them. Mark Sleein
and for Rush, We're going to close it out in
just a thank you so much for your company today.
(01:48:53):
Thank you as always to mister Snadley and the gang,
the best team in radio, no doubt, no question. They
have kept this show number one for decades. And thank
you most of all for all your prayers and your
kind words. For Rush. You can go to Rush limba
(01:49:14):
dot com and leave a special message. It's the Share
your Stories button. It's the horizontal menu bar above the
Rush limboor show banner. And if you go to I
think the third one along it's called Share your Stories
and you can I'm still I'm still thinking about this
doctor Jill Biden thing. You know, Whoopee Goldberg, it was
(01:49:36):
so impressed by doctor Jill Biden being a doctor. She
wants sir doctor Jill Biden to be a surgeon general.
I'd be in favor of letting doctor Jill Biden take
out whoopee Goldberg's appendix. So so you first, whoopee, just
get on the operating table, and well what about let's
let's have doctor Jill take out ja Hernia for you.
(01:50:00):
This has been Markstein. Rush is feeling a little better
and he hopes to be back tomorrow behind the golden
EIB microphone. Thanks for listening.