August 30, 2024 • 25 mins
Jon sits with entrepreneur and Dallas Mavericks minority owner Mark Cuban to discuss his plan to bring more transparency to consumers about the real costs of prescription drugs with his company, Cost Plus Drugs. They also chat about Trump’s desire to be CEO of America and Elon Musk’s role in disrupting global discourse with X algorithms.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
You're listening to Comedy Central.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Hey, this is Ryan Jang the Daily Shows on break
this week. But don't worry. We put together some special
highlights for you to catch up on in case you
miss them. We'll be back on September tenth. Until then,
enjoyed this episode.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
What about the dail show I got tonight?
Speaker 4 (00:22):
An entrepreneur, an already owner of the NBA's Dallas Marrick's,
co founder of Costs Plus drug company. Please welcome, Mark
Kevin shirt welcome, Thank you you are you're sir.
Speaker 3 (00:50):
Security.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
I didn't hear you what you said.
Speaker 3 (00:53):
This is no this is a Knicks down friend. They
love that. Now are people in New York?
Speaker 4 (01:02):
Are they because of the history between the Mavericks and
the Knicks generally with the trades where you fleeced us
to a certain extent, Uh, do you find there's a
kindness that is uh yeah, yeah, I'm extended to you, Nick.
Speaker 5 (01:15):
Literally, if I like to walk in New York right
and just today walking down the.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
Street, yeah, kill man.
Speaker 3 (01:20):
We love you and it's.
Speaker 5 (01:21):
Crazy literally a great basketball fans here. I get all
kinds of love.
Speaker 3 (01:26):
And that's what you get in New York. That's what
they shout at you.
Speaker 4 (01:28):
Yeah, but that's what I get. Now it's more thanks
for JB. Right, but yeah, that's what I write, well Jalen.
But now, did you have any idea when Jalen Brunson
was there? And I'm sorry to go down this road,
but I'm a Nick fan and this is just you're
gonna have to sit through ith Jalen Brunson was not
He started in the playoffs.
Speaker 3 (01:45):
When uh, yeah, when Luca got us, did you have any.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
Idea that he would become this all nb a phenomenon.
He's undersized, he doesn't his footwork is so phenomenal.
Speaker 5 (01:55):
No, no idea. I mean, I mean he was talented,
but he was picked in the second. If everybody knew,
he would have been a top five pick, right, I mean,
if you redraft that draft other than Luca, he is
a top.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Three or five pick.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
That's amazing.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
It's crazy. Yeah, but more credit to him.
Speaker 4 (02:09):
He worked on it, yeah, and he's and it just
seems like a phenomenal guy and then decided to take
a contract for less money than he could have made.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
So let's talk politics.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
Part the way.
Speaker 4 (02:24):
Now, you are in this interesting position in your career
where you've sort of above you are now, even though
I think your leanings are probably you consider more independent,
more libertarian.
Speaker 3 (02:34):
You are the left's favorite billionaire. You'd become.
Speaker 4 (02:41):
Because and I can't I don't know if it's because.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
There's a certain mellowing that occurs.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
As you get older, or if this new sort of
tech bro phenomenon is so dystopian in its formulae.
Speaker 5 (03:00):
Yeah, I mean this is all who I've always been.
I haven't been like the rich guy trying to act
like a rich guy. And my friends are still my
high school buddies, my college buddies, my rugby buddies. But
watching what's happened in Silicon Valley is insane, right right.
It's not so much a support thing. It's more like
a takeover thing, trying to put themselves in a position
to have as much control as possible. They want Trump
(03:21):
to be the CEO of the United States of America,
and they want to be the board of directors that
makes him listen to them.
Speaker 1 (03:27):
It's not a good.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
What is the ethos?
Speaker 4 (03:30):
Because it seems like in the old days of innovation
there was a certain amount of we're innervating the Internet,
we're taking things. Now it seems much more about sort
of this social engineering and transhumanism and we are going
to join with computers and together eight of us are
(03:50):
going to run everything dominating.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
Right, Is that the ethos you see?
Speaker 1 (03:55):
Yeah? I think with yeah, you just.
Speaker 4 (03:58):
Said, yeah, they've gotten to the point now where they
feel like they should control the world, right, and that
there should be a CEO in charge of everything. But
because they have a good photo app because of riches, right,
you know, it's just like you get to that point
sometimes where I think they've lost the connection to real world.
Speaker 3 (04:19):
Is it boredom?
Speaker 4 (04:20):
Like is there a certain extent like if you're like
a Bezos or one of those guys, you just you've
sold so many books that.
Speaker 3 (04:26):
You're just like, I'm going to live on Mars.
Speaker 5 (04:28):
Like it's just I think it's more what's their next act? Right,
We've like we invented this, we did this, we created that.
What can we do next? Somebody wants to go to Mars? Well,
what can we do here back on Earth? Well, let's
I mean look at Elon, right, Elon and being one
of those powerful people, he's trying to be the most
influential man in the world. It sounds like a commercial,
(04:51):
but literally that's what Twitter has given.
Speaker 4 (04:53):
I've got to say I think he might be that
because I don't even think he's trying to be.
Speaker 3 (04:57):
When you when you talk about somebody who is setting
up up.
Speaker 4 (05:00):
Satellite links for war zones and also controlling discourse in
the most important in the platform, that would.
Speaker 5 (05:07):
Think he's the most powerful because Twitter is in every
almost every country, right, and so Twitter gives him the
ability to connect to the prime minister, the head of
every country in the world that's right, and that person
whoever's in charge of that country has an interest in
what happens on Twitter, and what happens on Twitter because
of the control of the algorithms. Being the biggest user
is all dependent on Elon Musk. He literally wherever his
(05:29):
thumb wants to go, he gets to push his hard certainly.
Speaker 4 (05:32):
I mean, he's transparent about where he wants things to go.
I think he's very clear that civil war is inevitable,
and that's white people are under concerning, right, It's you know,
it'll be like civil wars inevitable. And then he'll write
underneath there, you know, kind of an understavement on there.
But I can't I can't decide whether or not. It's
(05:57):
better to know exactly where he stands and know where
he's going to be put the thumb on.
Speaker 3 (06:02):
Because he's clearly.
Speaker 4 (06:03):
A very bright guy, and he has a media empire
that has the largest reach and most influence of anything
on the face of the earth.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
And there's no question he's going to leverage it in
this election, no question.
Speaker 5 (06:15):
But the crazy part is he has more impact globally
than he does domestically in my opinion, right, because when
you go on X you see a preponderance of right
leaning people.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
You don't see a lot.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
They're all over for you. I've never clicked on any
of these.
Speaker 1 (06:28):
Well, that's the whole thing.
Speaker 4 (06:29):
That's the way algorithms work, right, what, Yes, they do
the opposite of what I want.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
Yes, But somebody tells me when you write an algorithm.
I haven't written a lot, it's been a while.
Speaker 5 (06:40):
But when you write one, you get to set the
parameters of what you want to see happen. And he
certainly has done that to the things he likes. But
it's different in other platforms. And the good news is
what twenty percent of adults in the United States are
on Twitter, So I mean there's eighty percent who aren't there.
Speaker 4 (06:56):
But isn't this a certain amount of tech bro malpractice
that there is this incredible need in the marketplace of
something that is slightly less biased or you know, toxic
when it comes through there and like they came out
with threads and you're on it for two seconds and
you're like, I think I need an app.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
No, I like threads. Threads is getting better. Try it.
Speaker 4 (07:17):
No, here's something that doesn't sell online. No, it's getting better.
That may be the worst sailshit ever. Okay for any
of these, but see, you you do disrupt industries like
there is. See, that's why I would have thought, and
I think you've said this that Trump appealed to you
at first because there is a certain outsider And look,
(07:39):
we both know our government there is a status quo
and there is a capture by lobbies and by big
businesses that write this legislation and end up gaining advantage that.
Speaker 3 (07:52):
Needs to be disrupted.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
Correct.
Speaker 4 (07:54):
When did it occur to you that he didn't necessarily
want to free it. He wanted to have the deed
to the swamp signed over to him.
Speaker 5 (08:03):
About the third time I talked to him, Right, it
was he wasn't about changing. I mean the conversations I
would have with him. I'm like, there was a time
when are these phone conversational conversations?
Speaker 3 (08:14):
Yes? Is it zoom?
Speaker 1 (08:15):
No, it wasn't zoom right, that was pre zoom. Actually
does he FaceTime?
Speaker 3 (08:18):
No?
Speaker 1 (08:19):
That didn't FaceTime right.
Speaker 5 (08:20):
But like we were talking about this one debate for
CNBC that he wasn't going to be at, and I'm.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
Like, don going, mud no going.
Speaker 5 (08:28):
And I'm like, Donald, why don't you go to a
local small business and sit there at the table and
just show off your business chops right, and show people
your business? He goes Mark, Donald Trump and Mark Cuban
don't go to people's houses and have dinner?
Speaker 1 (08:41):
Are you kidding me? That's who he is.
Speaker 5 (08:44):
Right when we talked about what's he going to do
with the ground game out, I got all these religious
people who are going to do their work.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
For me Jesus. So he in his mind.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
So I think this is very interesting because and maybe
you know this too, he runs a fan family business,
so he is in essence and monarch. It's a dictatorship,
and maybe there's not as much malevolence to his actions
as Oh this America can be a subsidiary of the
Trump organization because this is how I run it. And
(09:16):
they might say, well, we have checks and balances and
division of government, and he just thinks himself, Yeah, no,
we're going to get out of that.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
Yeah, that's the sense I get.
Speaker 3 (09:24):
That's what it is.
Speaker 5 (09:24):
Yeah, this is my country, right, everybody else is bad?
Donald Good? Okay, and so Donald Good. So whoever thinks
Donald goold also come.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
Along with the for the ride, right?
Speaker 5 (09:34):
I mean he just brought hate and anger to politics,
and that is a sales pitch.
Speaker 3 (09:40):
When you talk to him.
Speaker 4 (09:42):
Is that a part of his general conversation or do
you think that is a strategic demagoguing of He wants
to get that emotion.
Speaker 5 (09:51):
That wasn't what we talked about. But I think that's
Donald is a sales rep. He's a salesperson. He's going
to follow what works and whatever. He's going to try
all kinds of different thing. He's going to talk to
all kinds of different people and he'll try things out
and if it works, it's going to He's going to
do more of it.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Do you see him on his heels? Now?
Speaker 4 (10:08):
When was the last time that you sort of had
these counseling sessions.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
No, there weren't.
Speaker 4 (10:14):
I talked to him probably twenty nineteen. No, I talked
to him during the pandemic because I was trying to
help him with different things.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
Look, he's still the president of the United States.
Speaker 5 (10:22):
It's still our country, right, So I tried to help
him with PPE and a lot of different things, a
lot of medical cares type stuff.
Speaker 4 (10:29):
Sure, the guy who suggested the bleach is that you
is that everything. Everything's going great, everything's working Cuban the Princess.
Speaker 3 (10:39):
Have you tried drinking liquid Plumber?
Speaker 4 (10:42):
I did not say drink I said in Jack all right, Paradise.
So what is your relationship now with this tech world
and how does AI fit into that? And how do
you remain bullish on those innovations when they so clearly
(11:04):
are working to avoid any kind of regulation of these
new innovations.
Speaker 5 (11:09):
Okay, two things. One, they're there because they're rich, not
because they're tech bros. Or because they just happen to
make their money in tech. I don't think that's really
applicable the AI side. You know, I've been in technology
for a long time, and you can always look at
a new tech PCs networks, the Internet, streaming whatever, and say, Okay,
in five years, this is what's going to happen, right,
(11:29):
have a good sense with AI. You can't do that
with large language models. We have no idea whether it's
going to zig or zag or what the impact is
going to be.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
And that's the good news and the bad news. The
good news is we're dominating right now globally the United States.
Speaker 5 (11:42):
Is the bad news is in terms of in terms
of are the quality and the impact of the AI
and the advancements that we're introducing in AI, the research
that we're doing, we are, without questioning the leader, and
that's really important from a defense perspective, military, et cetera.
And also you know, from a business perspective, it's going
to have a big impact on this country. I personally
(12:04):
think it's generally positive, but there's a lot of uncertainty
to come.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
And so when you what.
Speaker 4 (12:09):
Gives you the hope that it's generally positive because I
as a counterpoint, we heard the same thing about social media,
and we heard the same thing about all these different
innovations of the connectivity, and yet every time I turn
on Congress, Zuckerberg's up there, like.
Speaker 3 (12:26):
Look, I'm really sad. I didn't know it was going
to kill all your daughters.
Speaker 5 (12:33):
Like, no, Remember, it's still just a short window. Social media,
you know, has really only been prominent last six years.
And I think we'll learn and we'll evolve, and the
same thing will happen with AI. There's going to be
points in time where it's up right and people are
using it. But I think over time, particularly with gen Z, right,
gen Z is a different beast. You know, boomers are idiots.
(12:54):
I mean we went from sex, We went from sex,
drugs and rock and roll to Fox News. I mean,
it doesn't get any worse than.
Speaker 4 (12:59):
That, Right, And they're trying to we haven't done well, and.
Speaker 5 (13:04):
They're trying to define regulations, right, and that's hard, right,
That's really really true. And so I think gen Z
has a better understanding and a better feel for AI
and where it's going and would maybe be able to
come up with better uses, better implementations, and better regulation.
Speaker 4 (13:20):
Does it concern you that the implementation time frame? So
when you think about the industrial revolution, right, and you
think about the disruption or globalization, the disruption to the workforce,
the way that labor can travel and labor cannot travel,
but capital can, right, and all these different things that
were kind of a race to the bottom for American
workers to a large extent. But all those changes took
(13:42):
place over sometimes the century, sometimes decades. The changes in
AI the disrupt, right. So when you've got something that
disrupts to maybe even a larger extent than globalization did,
to maybe a larger extent than the Industrial Revolution did,
and it's going to happen by Thursday, in what world
are humans in any way capable and set to withstand
(14:06):
that disruption.
Speaker 5 (14:07):
I think we'll be able to withstand it. But I
think it's going to be very disruptive. And the problem
is it's going to happen anyways. And you know, somebody here,
your son at Duke right, can say I've got this
great idea, I'm going to implement it with an open
source large language model, and I'm going to take it in.
Speaker 3 (14:23):
That's so weird. He did say that to me, right.
Speaker 4 (14:28):
But gen Z is different, right, gen Z, I think
looks at humanity humanity differently. Is kinder, Like I've got
three kids, fifteen, eighteen and twenty one, right, right, and
they're just nicer, right, They're not like we were. So
are you trying to say, like, are we weathering what
is the last gasp of this kind of more misanthropic
(14:52):
moment in history? So in your mind, whatever happens, this
is going to be a more misanthropic decade that will
be ameliorated by this younger generation.
Speaker 5 (15:03):
Right, I hope so, because the regulatory cap the way
we've always done politics right now is everybody's chasing power
and nothing will give you more power than military and AI.
And I think the algorithm. I mean, we've talked going
back to algorithms again, right, driven by AI. That's the
most powerful element in the world right now because everybody
(15:25):
just gets whatever they're seeing reinforced. And if you want
to influence somebody, just manipulate the algorithm and you'll get
their attention.
Speaker 4 (15:32):
And so but I think, so, what's the remedy on
that if there's no one working a pushback, If pushing
back on that is considered.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
You just got to go censorship.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
It's just one of those things where you've got to
go through it.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
It's an evolution of a new media model, just an
evolution of technology, right, media, right, because if we don't
do it, the Chinese and the Russians will because the
only thing that holds AI back is processing power, electricity,
and ingenuity, right, and I think our ingenuity wins.
Speaker 5 (16:01):
I'm still a big believer in an American exceptionalism. I
still believe that we've got the best technologists in the world,
and I think that's why we have to open that
door for AI.
Speaker 4 (16:08):
So ultimately it becomes a question of the world is
going to be carved up in the way that it's
always been somewhat carved up in terms of its resources.
The question is is it carved up by the Western
world or is it carved up by somebody else, a
different world? And do they set up a different system.
And I'm assuming that Russia and China see a unique
vulnerability in the West's ascension in this moment that's been
(16:31):
the world order since nineteenth.
Speaker 5 (16:33):
Everybody looks at it, right, and looks at it and
says AI, if I can he who controls AI?
Speaker 3 (16:38):
Right?
Speaker 5 (16:39):
And so, But we've done a good job of limiting processors.
The new Semiconductor Act will help us quite a bit,
and we'll bring things. You know, we were already doing
most of those things here.
Speaker 4 (16:52):
Right, So how do you resist the ring, right, So
like Lord of the Rings, the Ring of power, like
it's the one thing. Boy, when you get the ring,
you just don't want to let it go. How do
you resist that? Because you've got the money, you've got
the influence. You could be that guy. You could be
setting those things up and doing all that, but you're
just trying to get us like better generic aspirin, Like
(17:13):
what is happening?
Speaker 2 (17:15):
What?
Speaker 3 (17:17):
No, no, no, I'm telling you that I know what I.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
Know, and I know what I can do. I know
what I'm good at.
Speaker 4 (17:22):
Okay, and you're not tempted by the ring that's in
front of it.
Speaker 5 (17:28):
Because I think there's a different ring, right, Because yeah,
AI could be the end all be all technologically, but
that doesn't play to my strengths and the ups and
downs and ins and outs are just not me. But
you want to talk about pharmacy, what could be better
than the healthcare system in the United States of America
and make it so it's affordable.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
But there's your things, there's the path, there there is
I imagine when you get in that position, at that height,
you can't help but hear the siren call of you
could run this whole Thank you, but.
Speaker 5 (18:04):
Maybe a little bit, maybe a little bit, but you know,
just I hate to use the cliches, but the way
I was raised, I've got three kids, right, and I
don't want to miss that, you know, I don't want
to be ninety five and look back and say I
was president, but I didn't get to know my kids
at all. Right, you know, I'd rather say healthcare and
everybody's healthier, and everybody's got a better world to live in.
And my kids and I have friends, were close. You know,
(18:27):
they bring over the grandkids and the kids' kids, and
that's just more important to me.
Speaker 4 (18:31):
Right, And do you have your eye on other industries
right now where you can do sort of the same thing.
Speaker 5 (18:38):
If this pharmacy and where you know costplus Drugs dot
Com stant I'm gonna get that sales pitch in there.
Costplus Drugs dot Com is literally in process of having
a significant impact on the drug market.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
Right.
Speaker 5 (18:49):
We are pushing generic drugs down down now, we're right
around the corner front.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
Well, you're negotiating prices in a way that hasn't been done, right.
Speaker 5 (18:56):
So when you go prior to us, there was no
transparency whatsoever, right, and so nobody knew what the price
of any medication was, whether you're an employer playing for you.
Speaker 3 (19:05):
And it's just run by these boards.
Speaker 5 (19:07):
Yeah, these pharmacy benefit managers are dictating prices left and right.
They're basically stealing money from employers and employees. And so
we walked in there and said, what's the one missing
piece transparency? So when you go to costplus Drugs dot com,
you put in the name of the medication you might take.
Let's just say to dilaphil, right, I know you don't
know what's.
Speaker 3 (19:24):
Sort of drug. I'm so hopped up on.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
I have no idea.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
Do you know what it is?
Speaker 4 (19:31):
I don't generic sialis. As I said before, I am
so hot up. When you go to cost plus Drugs
(19:51):
dot com and you put into dila phil or what
I mean.
Speaker 5 (19:53):
First thing we do is we show you our cost.
Then we show you our markup, which is always fifteen percent,
and everybody gets the same price because we're mill order
to start, we're starting to partner with pharmacies. Now there
is a shipping fee, and then there's a fee for
the pharmacists.
Speaker 4 (20:06):
To review everything. And when you do it that way,
and this is legal, of course, it's legal. Yeah, it's
good old American capitalism. But let me just tell you
the impact.
Speaker 5 (20:15):
There are drugs that There's a drug called a matinet
for chemotherapy that when we started, the price of a
matinet if you just walked into a big pharmacy, a
big chain pharmacy, was going to be two thousand dollars.
You go to costplus Drugs dot com, it's under thirty.
There's a drug droxa dopa, right, that's.
Speaker 1 (20:30):
Just seen salty.
Speaker 5 (20:31):
I had a friend, I had a friend Landon who
was in a terrific car crash and he needed this
drug droxadopa and lost his insurance.
Speaker 4 (20:38):
It was going to be thirty thousand dollars every three months.
I'm like, let me just check to seafood. We can
get it sixty four dollars a month. And the price
has gone down since all because we were transparent. But like,
weren't there dudes like Martin Screlly in jail for shit
like that, Like when you jack prices up like that?
And why can't the United States government negotiate in terms
(21:01):
of if you're the largest customer to any industry, it's
criminal that you wouldn't use any leverage to make those
things more available.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
The problem was.
Speaker 5 (21:09):
There's this thing called pharmacy benefit managers, right, and they're
basically responsible for doing the negotiating with to a certain extent, Medicare,
but with all the large employers. If you're one of
those big companies that cover one hundred and fifty million
employees across the country, that's who you negotiate with. And
the first rule when they negotiate, they say is you
(21:30):
can't talk about this. It's like fight club. You cannot
say what your price is. You can't say what we're
doing in our negotiation. And they got so big doing
that that nobody ever questioned them. We come along, and
actually Martin Scurelly plays a little part in this whole
thing because when he got thrown in jail, I was
talking to alex Oshmyanski, my partner, and it's like, if
this dude can just jack up the price, it is
(21:52):
not an efficient market. That means nobody knows what the
real cost is. If we publish our price boom, the
whole world's going to change. As it turns out, the
FTC just came out with this report criticizing the PBMs.
They used our pricing data. The smartest thing we did
was so.
Speaker 4 (22:09):
Now, so this brings up so FTC is a Federal
Trade Commission, and boy, there's nothing the tech world.
Speaker 3 (22:14):
Hates more than the FC than the FTC. So how
does that square?
Speaker 5 (22:19):
Well, you know, like any agency they do, something's right
and something's wrong. So but in this case with the PBMs,
they're crushing them and it's justified.
Speaker 3 (22:27):
Now is it something that can't be done throughout the.
Speaker 4 (22:29):
Healthcare Because one of the difficulties with healthcare is the
contingencies of you can't really comparison shop. When you have
a heart attack, you're basically saying, drive me to.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
The closest hospital and take care of it.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
But those prices you're.
Speaker 4 (22:41):
Talking about, you could get heart attack treatment at this
hospital it's one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, but you
go up the street and it's twelve thousand.
Speaker 1 (22:48):
And it's all about knows what's and what happens is
who's pain?
Speaker 5 (22:50):
When you, you know, God forbid, have a heart attack
and you go there and let's just say it's going
through your employer, right, your employer has no idea what
they're paying. And so what we're saying is on drugs first,
and now we're just getting it approved today. We're going
to publish all contracts. Never before has it been done
where for my companies. We're saying, if you want to
do business with us, if this hospital system wants to
(23:12):
work with my companies, whatever it may be, we're going
to publish them and put them online for anybody to
see all of our pricing.
Speaker 3 (23:20):
So the right way.
Speaker 6 (23:21):
I think that's fantastic, But I'm curious, set why is
there such pushback on this idea of applying those same
kinds of competitions and things to our healthcare sism.
Speaker 4 (23:33):
You know, we talk about what we have about a privatized
healthcare sism and it's the best in the world, but
very clearly it.
Speaker 3 (23:38):
Doesn't function like a free market.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
No, it's not in the money way at all.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
So what is so terrible about getting everybody healthcare?
Speaker 3 (23:46):
Like? Why is that such?
Speaker 5 (23:47):
That's the moone thats But these companies, these PBMs and
the big insurance companies they call them the buka's the
largest insurance companies, right, they are so big, Like like
I keep on saying, big employers cover one hundred and
fifty million people, right, And the CEO of this big
company doesn't know much about healthcare and their health care costs,
and so they just say to them, Okay, we're going
to write you a check for a rebate, even though
(24:09):
it's your sickest.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Employees that are paying for that rebate.
Speaker 3 (24:12):
Right.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
They just don't know.
Speaker 3 (24:13):
And it's so.
Speaker 4 (24:14):
Interesting because it's such a non villainous you know, nobody
ever talks about like big prescription benefit manager, right.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
Like that's a good tell me.
Speaker 3 (24:25):
It's always like big oil is going to.
Speaker 4 (24:26):
Come down, or big tobacco or big farm, And it's
really like the pbaig middle manager.
Speaker 5 (24:30):
Yeah, that's what it is, right, and you cut them out, right,
there's no reason for the big ones that are controlled
ninety percent of the prescriptions that are filled, there's.
Speaker 4 (24:38):
No reason for them to exist. There are others that
are called pass through PBMs, right, that show you all
your claims, show you all your data, show you all
your pricing, that do it for a fraction of the price. Right,
So there's an opportunity to disruption.
Speaker 3 (24:50):
Disruption be like to see what's that? Now, what's what
else you have your eye on?
Speaker 1 (24:57):
It's for healthcare, healthcare.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
It's going to be healthcare health care. I'm with that.
Speaker 4 (25:00):
I'm with that too, and it might be, you know,
with that money, if you could help the Knicks get okay,
forget it, it's all fine. Thank you very much for
coming by. It's always a fascinating conversation.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
Check out costplus Drugs dot com.
Speaker 7 (25:16):
Mark Kevin Explore more shows from the Daily Show podcast
universe by searching The Daily Show wherever you get your podcasts.
Watch The Daily Show week nights at eleven ten Central
on Comedy Central, and stream full episodes anytime on Paramount
Speaker 3 (25:30):
Plus Paramount Podcasts
You're listening to Comedy Central.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Hey, this is Ryan Jang the Daily Shows on break
this week. But don't worry. We put together some special
highlights for you to catch up on in case you
miss them. We'll be back on September tenth. Until then,
enjoyed this episode.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
What about the dail show I got tonight?
Speaker 4 (00:22):
An entrepreneur, an already owner of the NBA's Dallas Marrick's,
co founder of Costs Plus drug company. Please welcome, Mark
Kevin shirt welcome, Thank you you are you're sir.
Speaker 3 (00:50):
Security.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
I didn't hear you what you said.
Speaker 3 (00:53):
This is no this is a Knicks down friend. They
love that. Now are people in New York?
Speaker 4 (01:02):
Are they because of the history between the Mavericks and
the Knicks generally with the trades where you fleeced us
to a certain extent, Uh, do you find there's a
kindness that is uh yeah, yeah, I'm extended to you, Nick.
Speaker 5 (01:15):
Literally, if I like to walk in New York right
and just today walking down the.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
Street, yeah, kill man.
Speaker 3 (01:20):
We love you and it's.
Speaker 5 (01:21):
Crazy literally a great basketball fans here. I get all
kinds of love.
Speaker 3 (01:26):
And that's what you get in New York. That's what
they shout at you.
Speaker 4 (01:28):
Yeah, but that's what I get. Now it's more thanks
for JB. Right, but yeah, that's what I write, well Jalen.
But now, did you have any idea when Jalen Brunson
was there? And I'm sorry to go down this road,
but I'm a Nick fan and this is just you're
gonna have to sit through ith Jalen Brunson was not
He started in the playoffs.
Speaker 3 (01:45):
When uh, yeah, when Luca got us, did you have any.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
Idea that he would become this all nb a phenomenon.
He's undersized, he doesn't his footwork is so phenomenal.
Speaker 5 (01:55):
No, no idea. I mean, I mean he was talented,
but he was picked in the second. If everybody knew,
he would have been a top five pick, right, I mean,
if you redraft that draft other than Luca, he is
a top.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Three or five pick.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
That's amazing.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
It's crazy. Yeah, but more credit to him.
Speaker 4 (02:09):
He worked on it, yeah, and he's and it just
seems like a phenomenal guy and then decided to take
a contract for less money than he could have made.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
So let's talk politics.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
Part the way.
Speaker 4 (02:24):
Now, you are in this interesting position in your career
where you've sort of above you are now, even though
I think your leanings are probably you consider more independent,
more libertarian.
Speaker 3 (02:34):
You are the left's favorite billionaire. You'd become.
Speaker 4 (02:41):
Because and I can't I don't know if it's because.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
There's a certain mellowing that occurs.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
As you get older, or if this new sort of
tech bro phenomenon is so dystopian in its formulae.
Speaker 5 (03:00):
Yeah, I mean this is all who I've always been.
I haven't been like the rich guy trying to act
like a rich guy. And my friends are still my
high school buddies, my college buddies, my rugby buddies. But
watching what's happened in Silicon Valley is insane, right right.
It's not so much a support thing. It's more like
a takeover thing, trying to put themselves in a position
to have as much control as possible. They want Trump
(03:21):
to be the CEO of the United States of America,
and they want to be the board of directors that
makes him listen to them.
Speaker 1 (03:27):
It's not a good.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
What is the ethos?
Speaker 4 (03:30):
Because it seems like in the old days of innovation
there was a certain amount of we're innervating the Internet,
we're taking things. Now it seems much more about sort
of this social engineering and transhumanism and we are going
to join with computers and together eight of us are
(03:50):
going to run everything dominating.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
Right, Is that the ethos you see?
Speaker 1 (03:55):
Yeah? I think with yeah, you just.
Speaker 4 (03:58):
Said, yeah, they've gotten to the point now where they
feel like they should control the world, right, and that
there should be a CEO in charge of everything. But
because they have a good photo app because of riches, right,
you know, it's just like you get to that point
sometimes where I think they've lost the connection to real world.
Speaker 3 (04:19):
Is it boredom?
Speaker 4 (04:20):
Like is there a certain extent like if you're like
a Bezos or one of those guys, you just you've
sold so many books that.
Speaker 3 (04:26):
You're just like, I'm going to live on Mars.
Speaker 5 (04:28):
Like it's just I think it's more what's their next act? Right,
We've like we invented this, we did this, we created that.
What can we do next? Somebody wants to go to Mars? Well,
what can we do here back on Earth? Well, let's
I mean look at Elon, right, Elon and being one
of those powerful people, he's trying to be the most
influential man in the world. It sounds like a commercial,
(04:51):
but literally that's what Twitter has given.
Speaker 4 (04:53):
I've got to say I think he might be that
because I don't even think he's trying to be.
Speaker 3 (04:57):
When you when you talk about somebody who is setting
up up.
Speaker 4 (05:00):
Satellite links for war zones and also controlling discourse in
the most important in the platform, that would.
Speaker 5 (05:07):
Think he's the most powerful because Twitter is in every
almost every country, right, and so Twitter gives him the
ability to connect to the prime minister, the head of
every country in the world that's right, and that person
whoever's in charge of that country has an interest in
what happens on Twitter, and what happens on Twitter because
of the control of the algorithms. Being the biggest user
is all dependent on Elon Musk. He literally wherever his
(05:29):
thumb wants to go, he gets to push his hard certainly.
Speaker 4 (05:32):
I mean, he's transparent about where he wants things to go.
I think he's very clear that civil war is inevitable,
and that's white people are under concerning, right, It's you know,
it'll be like civil wars inevitable. And then he'll write
underneath there, you know, kind of an understavement on there.
But I can't I can't decide whether or not. It's
(05:57):
better to know exactly where he stands and know where
he's going to be put the thumb on.
Speaker 3 (06:02):
Because he's clearly.
Speaker 4 (06:03):
A very bright guy, and he has a media empire
that has the largest reach and most influence of anything
on the face of the earth.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
And there's no question he's going to leverage it in
this election, no question.
Speaker 5 (06:15):
But the crazy part is he has more impact globally
than he does domestically in my opinion, right, because when
you go on X you see a preponderance of right
leaning people.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
You don't see a lot.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
They're all over for you. I've never clicked on any
of these.
Speaker 1 (06:28):
Well, that's the whole thing.
Speaker 4 (06:29):
That's the way algorithms work, right, what, Yes, they do
the opposite of what I want.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
Yes, But somebody tells me when you write an algorithm.
I haven't written a lot, it's been a while.
Speaker 5 (06:40):
But when you write one, you get to set the
parameters of what you want to see happen. And he
certainly has done that to the things he likes. But
it's different in other platforms. And the good news is
what twenty percent of adults in the United States are
on Twitter, So I mean there's eighty percent who aren't there.
Speaker 4 (06:56):
But isn't this a certain amount of tech bro malpractice
that there is this incredible need in the marketplace of
something that is slightly less biased or you know, toxic
when it comes through there and like they came out
with threads and you're on it for two seconds and
you're like, I think I need an app.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
No, I like threads. Threads is getting better. Try it.
Speaker 4 (07:17):
No, here's something that doesn't sell online. No, it's getting better.
That may be the worst sailshit ever. Okay for any
of these, but see, you you do disrupt industries like
there is. See, that's why I would have thought, and
I think you've said this that Trump appealed to you
at first because there is a certain outsider And look,
(07:39):
we both know our government there is a status quo
and there is a capture by lobbies and by big
businesses that write this legislation and end up gaining advantage that.
Speaker 3 (07:52):
Needs to be disrupted.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
Correct.
Speaker 4 (07:54):
When did it occur to you that he didn't necessarily
want to free it. He wanted to have the deed
to the swamp signed over to him.
Speaker 5 (08:03):
About the third time I talked to him, Right, it
was he wasn't about changing. I mean the conversations I
would have with him. I'm like, there was a time
when are these phone conversational conversations?
Speaker 3 (08:14):
Yes? Is it zoom?
Speaker 1 (08:15):
No, it wasn't zoom right, that was pre zoom. Actually
does he FaceTime?
Speaker 3 (08:18):
No?
Speaker 1 (08:19):
That didn't FaceTime right.
Speaker 5 (08:20):
But like we were talking about this one debate for
CNBC that he wasn't going to be at, and I'm.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
Like, don going, mud no going.
Speaker 5 (08:28):
And I'm like, Donald, why don't you go to a
local small business and sit there at the table and
just show off your business chops right, and show people
your business? He goes Mark, Donald Trump and Mark Cuban
don't go to people's houses and have dinner?
Speaker 1 (08:41):
Are you kidding me? That's who he is.
Speaker 5 (08:44):
Right when we talked about what's he going to do
with the ground game out, I got all these religious
people who are going to do their work.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
For me Jesus. So he in his mind.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
So I think this is very interesting because and maybe
you know this too, he runs a fan family business,
so he is in essence and monarch. It's a dictatorship,
and maybe there's not as much malevolence to his actions
as Oh this America can be a subsidiary of the
Trump organization because this is how I run it. And
(09:16):
they might say, well, we have checks and balances and
division of government, and he just thinks himself, Yeah, no,
we're going to get out of that.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
Yeah, that's the sense I get.
Speaker 3 (09:24):
That's what it is.
Speaker 5 (09:24):
Yeah, this is my country, right, everybody else is bad?
Donald Good? Okay, and so Donald Good. So whoever thinks
Donald goold also come.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
Along with the for the ride, right?
Speaker 5 (09:34):
I mean he just brought hate and anger to politics,
and that is a sales pitch.
Speaker 3 (09:40):
When you talk to him.
Speaker 4 (09:42):
Is that a part of his general conversation or do
you think that is a strategic demagoguing of He wants
to get that emotion.
Speaker 5 (09:51):
That wasn't what we talked about. But I think that's
Donald is a sales rep. He's a salesperson. He's going
to follow what works and whatever. He's going to try
all kinds of different thing. He's going to talk to
all kinds of different people and he'll try things out
and if it works, it's going to He's going to
do more of it.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Do you see him on his heels? Now?
Speaker 4 (10:08):
When was the last time that you sort of had
these counseling sessions.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
No, there weren't.
Speaker 4 (10:14):
I talked to him probably twenty nineteen. No, I talked
to him during the pandemic because I was trying to
help him with different things.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
Look, he's still the president of the United States.
Speaker 5 (10:22):
It's still our country, right, So I tried to help
him with PPE and a lot of different things, a
lot of medical cares type stuff.
Speaker 4 (10:29):
Sure, the guy who suggested the bleach is that you
is that everything. Everything's going great, everything's working Cuban the Princess.
Speaker 3 (10:39):
Have you tried drinking liquid Plumber?
Speaker 4 (10:42):
I did not say drink I said in Jack all right, Paradise.
So what is your relationship now with this tech world
and how does AI fit into that? And how do
you remain bullish on those innovations when they so clearly
(11:04):
are working to avoid any kind of regulation of these
new innovations.
Speaker 5 (11:09):
Okay, two things. One, they're there because they're rich, not
because they're tech bros. Or because they just happen to
make their money in tech. I don't think that's really
applicable the AI side. You know, I've been in technology
for a long time, and you can always look at
a new tech PCs networks, the Internet, streaming whatever, and say, Okay,
in five years, this is what's going to happen, right,
(11:29):
have a good sense with AI. You can't do that
with large language models. We have no idea whether it's
going to zig or zag or what the impact is
going to be.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
And that's the good news and the bad news. The
good news is we're dominating right now globally the United States.
Speaker 5 (11:42):
Is the bad news is in terms of in terms
of are the quality and the impact of the AI
and the advancements that we're introducing in AI, the research
that we're doing, we are, without questioning the leader, and
that's really important from a defense perspective, military, et cetera.
And also you know, from a business perspective, it's going
to have a big impact on this country. I personally
(12:04):
think it's generally positive, but there's a lot of uncertainty
to come.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
And so when you what.
Speaker 4 (12:09):
Gives you the hope that it's generally positive because I
as a counterpoint, we heard the same thing about social media,
and we heard the same thing about all these different
innovations of the connectivity, and yet every time I turn
on Congress, Zuckerberg's up there, like.
Speaker 3 (12:26):
Look, I'm really sad. I didn't know it was going
to kill all your daughters.
Speaker 5 (12:33):
Like, no, Remember, it's still just a short window. Social media,
you know, has really only been prominent last six years.
And I think we'll learn and we'll evolve, and the
same thing will happen with AI. There's going to be
points in time where it's up right and people are
using it. But I think over time, particularly with gen Z, right,
gen Z is a different beast. You know, boomers are idiots.
(12:54):
I mean we went from sex, We went from sex,
drugs and rock and roll to Fox News. I mean,
it doesn't get any worse than.
Speaker 4 (12:59):
That, Right, And they're trying to we haven't done well, and.
Speaker 5 (13:04):
They're trying to define regulations, right, and that's hard, right,
That's really really true. And so I think gen Z
has a better understanding and a better feel for AI
and where it's going and would maybe be able to
come up with better uses, better implementations, and better regulation.
Speaker 4 (13:20):
Does it concern you that the implementation time frame? So
when you think about the industrial revolution, right, and you
think about the disruption or globalization, the disruption to the workforce,
the way that labor can travel and labor cannot travel,
but capital can, right, and all these different things that
were kind of a race to the bottom for American
workers to a large extent. But all those changes took
(13:42):
place over sometimes the century, sometimes decades. The changes in
AI the disrupt, right. So when you've got something that
disrupts to maybe even a larger extent than globalization did,
to maybe a larger extent than the Industrial Revolution did,
and it's going to happen by Thursday, in what world
are humans in any way capable and set to withstand
(14:06):
that disruption.
Speaker 5 (14:07):
I think we'll be able to withstand it. But I
think it's going to be very disruptive. And the problem
is it's going to happen anyways. And you know, somebody here,
your son at Duke right, can say I've got this
great idea, I'm going to implement it with an open
source large language model, and I'm going to take it in.
Speaker 3 (14:23):
That's so weird. He did say that to me, right.
Speaker 4 (14:28):
But gen Z is different, right, gen Z, I think
looks at humanity humanity differently. Is kinder, Like I've got
three kids, fifteen, eighteen and twenty one, right, right, and
they're just nicer, right, They're not like we were. So
are you trying to say, like, are we weathering what
is the last gasp of this kind of more misanthropic
(14:52):
moment in history? So in your mind, whatever happens, this
is going to be a more misanthropic decade that will
be ameliorated by this younger generation.
Speaker 5 (15:03):
Right, I hope so, because the regulatory cap the way
we've always done politics right now is everybody's chasing power
and nothing will give you more power than military and AI.
And I think the algorithm. I mean, we've talked going
back to algorithms again, right, driven by AI. That's the
most powerful element in the world right now because everybody
(15:25):
just gets whatever they're seeing reinforced. And if you want
to influence somebody, just manipulate the algorithm and you'll get
their attention.
Speaker 4 (15:32):
And so but I think, so, what's the remedy on
that if there's no one working a pushback, If pushing
back on that is considered.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
You just got to go censorship.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
It's just one of those things where you've got to
go through it.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
It's an evolution of a new media model, just an
evolution of technology, right, media, right, because if we don't
do it, the Chinese and the Russians will because the
only thing that holds AI back is processing power, electricity,
and ingenuity, right, and I think our ingenuity wins.
Speaker 5 (16:01):
I'm still a big believer in an American exceptionalism. I
still believe that we've got the best technologists in the world,
and I think that's why we have to open that
door for AI.
Speaker 4 (16:08):
So ultimately it becomes a question of the world is
going to be carved up in the way that it's
always been somewhat carved up in terms of its resources.
The question is is it carved up by the Western
world or is it carved up by somebody else, a
different world? And do they set up a different system.
And I'm assuming that Russia and China see a unique
vulnerability in the West's ascension in this moment that's been
(16:31):
the world order since nineteenth.
Speaker 5 (16:33):
Everybody looks at it, right, and looks at it and
says AI, if I can he who controls AI?
Speaker 3 (16:38):
Right?
Speaker 5 (16:39):
And so, But we've done a good job of limiting processors.
The new Semiconductor Act will help us quite a bit,
and we'll bring things. You know, we were already doing
most of those things here.
Speaker 4 (16:52):
Right, So how do you resist the ring, right, So
like Lord of the Rings, the Ring of power, like
it's the one thing. Boy, when you get the ring,
you just don't want to let it go. How do
you resist that? Because you've got the money, you've got
the influence. You could be that guy. You could be
setting those things up and doing all that, but you're
just trying to get us like better generic aspirin, Like
(17:13):
what is happening?
Speaker 2 (17:15):
What?
Speaker 3 (17:17):
No, no, no, I'm telling you that I know what I.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
Know, and I know what I can do. I know
what I'm good at.
Speaker 4 (17:22):
Okay, and you're not tempted by the ring that's in
front of it.
Speaker 5 (17:28):
Because I think there's a different ring, right, Because yeah,
AI could be the end all be all technologically, but
that doesn't play to my strengths and the ups and
downs and ins and outs are just not me. But
you want to talk about pharmacy, what could be better
than the healthcare system in the United States of America
and make it so it's affordable.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
But there's your things, there's the path, there there is
I imagine when you get in that position, at that height,
you can't help but hear the siren call of you
could run this whole Thank you, but.
Speaker 5 (18:04):
Maybe a little bit, maybe a little bit, but you know,
just I hate to use the cliches, but the way
I was raised, I've got three kids, right, and I
don't want to miss that, you know, I don't want
to be ninety five and look back and say I
was president, but I didn't get to know my kids
at all. Right, you know, I'd rather say healthcare and
everybody's healthier, and everybody's got a better world to live in.
And my kids and I have friends, were close. You know,
(18:27):
they bring over the grandkids and the kids' kids, and
that's just more important to me.
Speaker 4 (18:31):
Right, And do you have your eye on other industries
right now where you can do sort of the same thing.
Speaker 5 (18:38):
If this pharmacy and where you know costplus Drugs dot
Com stant I'm gonna get that sales pitch in there.
Costplus Drugs dot Com is literally in process of having
a significant impact on the drug market.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
Right.
Speaker 5 (18:49):
We are pushing generic drugs down down now, we're right
around the corner front.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
Well, you're negotiating prices in a way that hasn't been done, right.
Speaker 5 (18:56):
So when you go prior to us, there was no
transparency whatsoever, right, and so nobody knew what the price
of any medication was, whether you're an employer playing for you.
Speaker 3 (19:05):
And it's just run by these boards.
Speaker 5 (19:07):
Yeah, these pharmacy benefit managers are dictating prices left and right.
They're basically stealing money from employers and employees. And so
we walked in there and said, what's the one missing
piece transparency? So when you go to costplus Drugs dot com,
you put in the name of the medication you might take.
Let's just say to dilaphil, right, I know you don't
know what's.
Speaker 3 (19:24):
Sort of drug. I'm so hopped up on.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
I have no idea.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
Do you know what it is?
Speaker 4 (19:31):
I don't generic sialis. As I said before, I am
so hot up. When you go to cost plus Drugs
(19:51):
dot com and you put into dila phil or what
I mean.
Speaker 5 (19:53):
First thing we do is we show you our cost.
Then we show you our markup, which is always fifteen percent,
and everybody gets the same price because we're mill order
to start, we're starting to partner with pharmacies. Now there
is a shipping fee, and then there's a fee for
the pharmacists.
Speaker 4 (20:06):
To review everything. And when you do it that way,
and this is legal, of course, it's legal. Yeah, it's
good old American capitalism. But let me just tell you
the impact.
Speaker 5 (20:15):
There are drugs that There's a drug called a matinet
for chemotherapy that when we started, the price of a
matinet if you just walked into a big pharmacy, a
big chain pharmacy, was going to be two thousand dollars.
You go to costplus Drugs dot com, it's under thirty.
There's a drug droxa dopa, right, that's.
Speaker 1 (20:30):
Just seen salty.
Speaker 5 (20:31):
I had a friend, I had a friend Landon who
was in a terrific car crash and he needed this
drug droxadopa and lost his insurance.
Speaker 4 (20:38):
It was going to be thirty thousand dollars every three months.
I'm like, let me just check to seafood. We can
get it sixty four dollars a month. And the price
has gone down since all because we were transparent. But like,
weren't there dudes like Martin Screlly in jail for shit
like that, Like when you jack prices up like that?
And why can't the United States government negotiate in terms
(21:01):
of if you're the largest customer to any industry, it's
criminal that you wouldn't use any leverage to make those
things more available.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
The problem was.
Speaker 5 (21:09):
There's this thing called pharmacy benefit managers, right, and they're
basically responsible for doing the negotiating with to a certain extent, Medicare,
but with all the large employers. If you're one of
those big companies that cover one hundred and fifty million
employees across the country, that's who you negotiate with. And
the first rule when they negotiate, they say is you
(21:30):
can't talk about this. It's like fight club. You cannot
say what your price is. You can't say what we're
doing in our negotiation. And they got so big doing
that that nobody ever questioned them. We come along, and
actually Martin Scurelly plays a little part in this whole
thing because when he got thrown in jail, I was
talking to alex Oshmyanski, my partner, and it's like, if
this dude can just jack up the price, it is
(21:52):
not an efficient market. That means nobody knows what the
real cost is. If we publish our price boom, the
whole world's going to change. As it turns out, the
FTC just came out with this report criticizing the PBMs.
They used our pricing data. The smartest thing we did
was so.
Speaker 4 (22:09):
Now, so this brings up so FTC is a Federal
Trade Commission, and boy, there's nothing the tech world.
Speaker 3 (22:14):
Hates more than the FC than the FTC. So how
does that square?
Speaker 5 (22:19):
Well, you know, like any agency they do, something's right
and something's wrong. So but in this case with the PBMs,
they're crushing them and it's justified.
Speaker 3 (22:27):
Now is it something that can't be done throughout the.
Speaker 4 (22:29):
Healthcare Because one of the difficulties with healthcare is the
contingencies of you can't really comparison shop. When you have
a heart attack, you're basically saying, drive me to.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
The closest hospital and take care of it.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
But those prices you're.
Speaker 4 (22:41):
Talking about, you could get heart attack treatment at this
hospital it's one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, but you
go up the street and it's twelve thousand.
Speaker 1 (22:48):
And it's all about knows what's and what happens is
who's pain?
Speaker 5 (22:50):
When you, you know, God forbid, have a heart attack
and you go there and let's just say it's going
through your employer, right, your employer has no idea what
they're paying. And so what we're saying is on drugs first,
and now we're just getting it approved today. We're going
to publish all contracts. Never before has it been done
where for my companies. We're saying, if you want to
do business with us, if this hospital system wants to
(23:12):
work with my companies, whatever it may be, we're going
to publish them and put them online for anybody to
see all of our pricing.
Speaker 3 (23:20):
So the right way.
Speaker 6 (23:21):
I think that's fantastic, But I'm curious, set why is
there such pushback on this idea of applying those same
kinds of competitions and things to our healthcare sism.
Speaker 4 (23:33):
You know, we talk about what we have about a privatized
healthcare sism and it's the best in the world, but
very clearly it.
Speaker 3 (23:38):
Doesn't function like a free market.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
No, it's not in the money way at all.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
So what is so terrible about getting everybody healthcare?
Speaker 3 (23:46):
Like? Why is that such?
Speaker 5 (23:47):
That's the moone thats But these companies, these PBMs and
the big insurance companies they call them the buka's the
largest insurance companies, right, they are so big, Like like
I keep on saying, big employers cover one hundred and
fifty million people, right, And the CEO of this big
company doesn't know much about healthcare and their health care costs,
and so they just say to them, Okay, we're going
to write you a check for a rebate, even though
(24:09):
it's your sickest.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Employees that are paying for that rebate.
Speaker 3 (24:12):
Right.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
They just don't know.
Speaker 3 (24:13):
And it's so.
Speaker 4 (24:14):
Interesting because it's such a non villainous you know, nobody
ever talks about like big prescription benefit manager, right.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
Like that's a good tell me.
Speaker 3 (24:25):
It's always like big oil is going to.
Speaker 4 (24:26):
Come down, or big tobacco or big farm, And it's
really like the pbaig middle manager.
Speaker 5 (24:30):
Yeah, that's what it is, right, and you cut them out, right,
there's no reason for the big ones that are controlled
ninety percent of the prescriptions that are filled, there's.
Speaker 4 (24:38):
No reason for them to exist. There are others that
are called pass through PBMs, right, that show you all
your claims, show you all your data, show you all
your pricing, that do it for a fraction of the price. Right,
So there's an opportunity to disruption.
Speaker 3 (24:50):
Disruption be like to see what's that? Now, what's what
else you have your eye on?
Speaker 1 (24:57):
It's for healthcare, healthcare.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
It's going to be healthcare health care. I'm with that.
Speaker 4 (25:00):
I'm with that too, and it might be, you know,
with that money, if you could help the Knicks get okay,
forget it, it's all fine. Thank you very much for
coming by. It's always a fascinating conversation.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
Check out costplus Drugs dot com.
Speaker 7 (25:16):
Mark Kevin Explore more shows from the Daily Show podcast
universe by searching The Daily Show wherever you get your podcasts.
Watch The Daily Show week nights at eleven ten Central
on Comedy Central, and stream full episodes anytime on Paramount
Speaker 3 (25:30):
Plus Paramount Podcasts
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.