The Activist Judge Crisis

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning, coner. Contrary, Okay, my friends, almost unprecedented. I'm
not saying it's unprecedented because it has happened before a
few times in the past. But let's put it this way,
extremely rare. Chief Justice John Roberts yesterday publicly rebuked President Trump,

(00:24):
and without naming him, it was clearly intended against him.
And what Roberts was reacting to was President Trump's call
on truth social in a blistering social media post calling
for the impeachment of that radical left wing lunatic judge

(00:46):
James Bosberg. As we talked about recently, Bosberg is the
Obama appointed judge, a man of the far hard left,
who literally blocked President Trump's executive order deporting over two

(01:07):
hundred and fifty trend Dearagua Venezuelan gang bangers and terrorists. Again,
these are people, illegal aliens, criminals in our country, murderers, rapists, kidnappers,
weapons traffickers, drug dealers, child molesters. They have been convicted

(01:30):
of every grotesque crime imaginable, and yet this out of
control judge issues an outrageous order blocking Trump from deporting them,
and not only that, ordering that the the planes that
were deporting them be turned around. Obviously, Trump told them

(01:52):
to go fly a kite. They were in the air
at the time. They said it was an oral directive,
not a written directive, and so they landed the planes
in El Salvador, where these Trend de Aragua gangbangers, along
with some MS thirteen thugs, were put in a maximum
or a supermax prison. Now for fourteen days, President Trump's

(02:16):
hands have been tied by Judge Bosberg. He cannot deport
a single member of Trend de Aragua, even though they
are a designated foreign terrorist organization. And this fourteen day period,
this injunction may be renewed again and again and again.

(02:37):
So a single judge is now usurping the power of
the president and overruling the president, literally overruling the president
on a matter of national security that the president campaigned
on and won his election. And so Trump rightly went

(02:59):
to social and said, this guy is abusing his power,
usurping his authority. He doesn't have jurisdiction. This is not
just judicial overreach, this is the sabotage of my administration.
It's another form of lawfare. And he should go. He

(03:21):
needs to be impeached. Roberts immediately came out with a statement.
Listen now to this where he attacked President Trump, not
by name, but it was obvious it was intended against him.
And so he wrote, and this is very very rare.

(03:43):
This is what he wrote. According to Roberts, he came
out and said that for more than two centuries, it
has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate recon
response to disagreement concerning a judicial system, sorry, concerning a

(04:05):
judicial decision. Roberts said, the normal appellate review process exists
for that purpose. So what he's essentially telling Trump, you
had no right to call for Bosberg's impeachment. If you
don't like what this judge did. Take it through the

(04:26):
normal appellate process. In other words, you can appeal, this
can go up to other courts. Eventually, maybe it'll reach
the Supreme Court. That's how you deal with it. You
don't go on social media and call for this judge's
Bosberg's impeachment. In other words, Roberts is defending Boseberg. Now,

(04:51):
the question you have to ask yourself is why why
why would Roberts go out of his way to defend Bosberg?
And I think to me, there is no other conclusion
he's being blackmailed. He's compromised. He's clearly compromised. I think

(05:14):
he's part of on the I think he's I think
they have him on the Epstein list personally, but we'll see.
I want the Epstein list to be released. But whatever
they have on him, it is very clear that Roberts
now is no longer acting in the best interests of
the judiciary. He is no longer acting in the best
interests of the court. He is clearly now becoming a

(05:38):
part of the anti Trump resistance to undermine, block, and
ultimately sabotage President Trump and his agenda. I can't read
the evidence any other way. Boseberg's ruling was absolutely outrageous,
beyond outrageous, and on two grounds. Number one, he is

(06:04):
not elected president of the United States, as Nude Kingrich
rightly said, if Roberts is so intent on protecting the
independence of the judiciary, then he needs to step up
and block these bad judges. Call out these bad judges

(06:28):
before the executive and the legislative branches intervene. He has
to overrule these bad judges when they are clearly now
trying to overrule the President of the United States, who
is behaving well within his constitutional powers and constitutional authority. Look,

(06:49):
I'm sorry, you're gonna tell me now that the president
doesn't have the power to designate a group as a
foreign terrorist organization. No, he can't do that. Now we
have to rely on a judge. And because and since
they're designated as a foreign terrorist organization, he doesn't have

(07:09):
the right to deport him. It's got to what he's
got to every single district judge now has the right
to decide whether Trump can act as commander in chief.
If you allow this precedent, it will literally paralyze and
destroy the executive branch. They're telling the President that he

(07:32):
cannot control, administer, or run or oversee the entire branch
of government that he's the head of. The only one
attacking our separation of powers are these rogue, out of
control activist judges. The only ones that are usurping authority

(07:54):
is them. The only one triggering a constitutional crisis is them.
It's not Trump. And notice when AOC and the Democrats
proposed legislation under Biden to literally pack the Supreme Court,

(08:15):
in other words, to dilute and water down the very
power of the bench that Robert sits on that he oversees.
He's the chief Justice. Did he issue a statement rebuking
them NA when they called for the impeachment of certain
judges Here, when AOC last year openly called for Clarence Thomas,

(08:42):
Justice Thomas to be impeached from the bench along with
other leading Democrats, did Chief Justice John Roberts come out
and say, ooh, for over two centuries, we don't use impeachment.
It's inappropriate. You shouldn't attack the independence of the juiary. Yet,

(09:04):
but he comes to the rescue of Boseburg. I want
to know what do they have on Roberts. He's clearly compromised,
and he's clearly being blackmailed. And if he is being blackmailed,
and I believe he is, then he has no right

(09:26):
to be sitting on that bench. He should resign effective immediately.
Now on the bigger issue, President Trump now needs to
take this all the way to the Supreme Court immediately.
And the question now is this, does a district judge

(09:47):
have the power of the president. Because what you're seeing,
my friends, is the Democrats now can't stop him in Congress.
They clearly can't stop him with public opinion. They couldn't
beat him in the election, and so now you are
seeing dozens and dozens of these district judges act as

(10:09):
part of the resistance le desistance, and they are now
looking to sabotage, block, and essentially paralyze Trump's presidency. In fact,
another district judge just yesterday came out and said what
Doage did to usaid unconstitutional. Another district judge said Trump

(10:34):
now has to release billions of dollars in foreign aid.
In other words, they're declaring null and void. Practically everything
that Trump has done Doge is unconstitutional. Cutting the federal
bureaucracy is unconstitutional, Cutting foreign eight is unconstitutional. According to them,
a judicial crisis. Some are calling it now even a

(10:57):
constitutional crisis. Six eight on the Great WRKO Jeff koon Er,
Boston's Bulldozer. President Trump yesterday gave a wide ranging interview
to Laura Ingram on Fox News, and I'll play some
cuts obviously from it, But what the big takeaway was
that it's obvious that Trump now realizes he's being attacked again.

(11:20):
This is another form of lawfare, except they're not weaponizing
so much the legal system to prosecute him and put
them behind bars. They're now weaponizing the judicial system, and
in particular these lower court judges, district court judges like
this clown judge James Boseberg, among others, who now are

(11:45):
deliberately issuing restraining orders injunctions blocking Trump from being able
to effectively govern as president of the United States. And
that's if you read the famous novel Gulliver's Travels by
Jonathan Swift, they remind me of where you know, the Liliputians.

(12:08):
Those were very little people. They're very small in fact,
they don't have a lot of power, but they were
able to keep tying up a giant. They just kept
tying them up and tying them up, and tying them
up and tying them up, and before you know it,
the giant becomes utterly paralyzed. And that's what these that's
what they are. They're left wing, radical Liliputians active as

(12:32):
judges who are substituting themselves for the authority and legitimacy
of the president of the United States. They make no
mistake about what we're watching. This is a naked power
grab in which the judicial branch or aspects rogue judges

(12:52):
on the on this on the rogue in the rogue
judiciary are trying to deliberately usurp the legitimate constitutional power
of the president of the United States. And Trump now
has to deal with this because they're going to effectively
grind his presidency to a halt. So, as I speak

(13:14):
to you, now listen to this. Trump is unable to
make deportations. He has been blocked MS thirteen gang bangers,
trendor arragua criminal illegal aliens. Again, these are people with
records either here or from Venezuela, where most of them

(13:35):
were deliberately released from prisons. These are convicted murderers, rapists,
child sex predators, extortionists, They engage in drug trafficking, child trafficking,
weapons trafficking. We're talking about people who've engaged in massive
crimes here, including the murder of Lake and Riley and

(13:58):
then the gang rape and then mutilation of joycelin nanngare
a twelve year old child. And the judge is siding
with them, saying that they don't they they should not
be deported, they have a right to stay in the
United States, and that Trump is wrong to be deporting them,

(14:20):
and so he's effectively now blocked. President Trump. In fact,
he's now ordered the White House. There's a deadline today
at noon that he has to provide the details of
the deportations of Trenduragua and MS thirteen. How are they
able to track them down? Where are they deporting them to?

(14:44):
Where are they deporting them from the logistics of these deportations. Now,
I'm telling you that this judge is out of control,
and I want to give a big hat tip to
Laura Loomer. Listen now to this story. Talked about it
on AX last night. Again, if you're not following me
on X, trust me, you're you're missing a lot. Believe

(15:06):
me again. Laura Lumer was the one who broke the story.
Judge Bosberg has a daughter. Her name is Katherine Boseberg.
She works for a radical left wing open borders group.
What do you think the group champions? By the way,

(15:28):
we pay that group. That's taxpayer dollars, grant after grant
after grant. We are literally paying for this group through
taxpayer dollars. And they provide illegals with free legal services,
by the way, including convicted felons and gang bangers. We

(15:49):
pay for lawyers for them through taxpayer money. But let
that go. The group is opposed to mass deportations. They
say it is a trime to deport anyone, including convicted murderers, rapists,
and felons. So you have a judge's daughter who is

(16:14):
working and getting paid off the taxpayer, dying for a
group that is rapidly anti Trump, campaigned against Trump, is
dead set against his deportations and even sides with criminal
illegal alien, violent offenders, and felons, saying you should not

(16:36):
deport them, you should leave them here in the United States.
This screams conflict of interest. As I said on X
last night, can you say conflict of interest? And not
only is it a naked corrupt conflict of interest. This
is like Judge Merchan and the whole Alvin bradcase all

(16:59):
over again. But now you want the president and his
team to hand over this judge with that daughter and
what they're They're basically there to help illegals get away
and to help trend Or a rag one MS thirteen
escape American custody and American detention and American deportation. And

(17:21):
you want the American government to hand over the judge
specific details and logistics about how they go after trend
Or a ragu one MS thirteen how they capture them,
how they detain them, how they deport them from which airports?

Speaker 2 (17:39):
Are you freaking crazy? Are you crazy? This judge needs
to be recused. Hey, he needs to be impeached. It's
it's we're talking. This is naked corruption and abuse of power.
But he must be recused period. He should not be

(18:03):
overseeing this case. Agree, disagree.

Speaker 1 (18:10):
I want to ask you, it is the Kooner Country
Pole Question of the Day sponsored by Marios Mario's Quality Roofing,
Siding and Windows. Who do you blame for this judicial crisis?
As Chief Justice John Roberts basically said yesterday we are

(18:33):
now in a judicial constitutional crisis? Is it a these
rogue judges, these activist lower court judges, people like James
Bodsburg or b as Roberts was implying, it's President Trump,

(18:55):
that Trump is the initiator, Trump is the aggressor. Trump
should just let all of this play out in the
appeals process as it drags on for months and months
and months, in many cases for years. You know where
I stand. I think this is a all the way,

(19:15):
it's these rogue activist judges who are bent on an
unprecedented power grab. Okay, was Trump out of line for
demanding that Judge James Boseberg be impeached Judge Roberts. Chief
Justice John Roberts yesterday said, yes, it was a rebuke

(19:39):
from the bench saying that you don't do this in
the United States. This is an attack on the judiciary,
the independence of the judiciary, that these are noble judges,
these are good judges, and that if you have a
problem with a judge's decision, you take it to appeal
and you let yourself work its way through the entire

(20:00):
judicial process. It was a direct slap in the face
to Trump. He didn't call him out by name, but
it was clear who was intended to listen now. Trump
yesterday interviewed by Laura Ingram, She asked him point blank,
you called for the impeachment of Boseburg, and Chief Justice

(20:22):
John Roberts ran to his defense. Do you have a comment?
Roll cut to Mike.

Speaker 3 (20:32):
The Chief Justice said, more than two centuries we understood
that essentially impeachment was for very rare circumstances and not
an appropriate response to rulings you disagree with. What's your
reaction to the courts stepping in to make a statement here.
They didn't make a statement. When Joe Biden decided to
forgive all those student loans, Well.

Speaker 4 (20:53):
He didn't mention my name in the saatement. I just
saw it quickly. He didn't mention my name. But many
people have called for his impeachment, pachment of this judge.
I don't know who the judge is, but he's radical left.
He was Obama appointed, and he actually said we shouldn't
be able to take criminals, killers, murders, horrible, the worst people,
gang members, gang leaders, that we shouldn't be allowed to

(21:15):
take them out of our country. Well, that's a presidential job.
That's not for a local judge to be making that determination.

Speaker 1 (21:22):
He's completely right. But what these district judges are now
doing is they're arrogating to themselves. Essentially the power of
the executive branch. Are being literally are being president. You
have about six hundred and seventy six, six hundred and
eighty district judges, and you've got these rogue judges now

(21:42):
who now say, no, you may have won the election,
but we're the president. We decide who you can deport,
who you can't deport, who you can fire, who you
can't fire, what programs you can cut what programs you
can't cut, What foreign aid you can cut, what foreign
ad you can't cut. Basically, they want to put Trump
in a straight jacket and literally cripple him politically, legally, constitutionally,

(22:09):
make it impossible for him to do his job. What
should Trump do? And in this battle between Trump and
Chief Justice Roberts, who do you side with? Jack in Tewkesbury.
Thanks for holding Jack and welcome.

Speaker 5 (22:29):
Good morning, Jeff. After this phone call, hopefully after this
phone call, you and I, you and I can remain friends.
I am not Bill from Sudbury, but I do agree
with Justice Roberts that Trump speaking out specifically saying he
should be impeached is wrong, definitely wrong. But it's two
different issues. The judges are wrong. I'll guarantee you every

(22:50):
one of these radical judges have somebody below them, a
daughter or a son, and some kind of an organization. This
is more than coincidence, Jeff, way more than coincidence. My advice,
Trump defies the order, the fourteen day order, and what
they say they no, forget it, You're getting nothing. You
can't stop me. You don't have the constitutional right to
stop me and challenge him and force him to go

(23:12):
through the courts, because this is going to stop. The
only way it stops. You got to bring it to
a head because you can't play legal games because they
will drag it to the courts for years and handcuff him.
Defy the order. That's what I say. DeFi the order.
Let the judge enforce it. Let's see what he can do.
Bring it to a head, because it's got to get
before the Supreme Court justices. They ruled against us on
the spending of USA. What was a two billion, twenty

(23:34):
billion they let that or twenty million, whatever it was
when Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett went against us. But
that was a separate issue. They weren't challenging the legality
of the judge's rulings. They were challenging about the money,
and the money was already allocated, so they ruled it
against us. But we have to bring the issue of

(23:55):
all these judges trying to use unsurrup the president is
to usurp the president United States got to come to ahead.
I say, defy it.

Speaker 1 (24:05):
Well, Jack, I have to be honest. I mean, I
agree with you. I don't really I don't know where
the disagreement is. I'm like, I'm nodding my head. I'm
nodding my head. I'm like, Okay, I agree, greed, greed.
I'm like, where's I hope we could still be friends.
I'm waiting for that part where we're not supposed to
be friends. I think what you're saying, Jack, is he
shouldn't have gone on truth social and called for Boseburg

(24:28):
to be impeached. Correct. I think that's your your point
of contention with Trump.

Speaker 5 (24:34):
He Roberts is right on that one thing.

Speaker 6 (24:37):
For once.

Speaker 5 (24:38):
He's right. The president shouldn't call for the impeachment of
a judge because, I mean, you're calling out the judicial system.
You got to He's defending the judicial system, right or wrong.
He's defending the system itself, and he has to. As
the Chief Court Justice of the United States, he has
to defend that branch. What is it oticle free in
the Constitution.

Speaker 1 (24:59):
But Jack, let me, no, No, I understand it. You're
making a very coherent argument. Frank, you're definitely not built
from Sudbury. I guarantee you that you know you're making
a very smart, intelligent, cogent, coherent argument. No, Jack, I mean, look,
he's not going to remove the judge. You know, it's
not like Trump said, hey, I'm going to impeach him,

(25:20):
or you know, I'm going to lead efforts in Congress
to impeach him. He's just basically saying, this guy's out
of control and Congress should step in. It's up to
Congress and impeach this judge. Now, you're right, it is
rare that judges are impeached. It's been about fifteen times
in our history. I think the last one was like

(25:41):
fifteen years ago. But you know, to me, a president
venting and going after a clearly out of control, frankly
rogue judge who is very I mean, he's got massive
conflicts of interest. I don't think it's so out of
And then you say, well, you know Chief Justice Roberts

(26:03):
has to defend the judiciary. Well where was he? Okay, fine,
let's just assume that for the sake of argument. But
where was he when Joe Biden deliberately ignored the Supreme
Court's ruling on student loans? Roberts didn't open his mouth.
You want to talk about an attack on the judiciary,

(26:24):
that was you couldn't get a more mortal blow than that.
Or when AOC called for his own colleague to be impeached,
and not just AOC. The Democrats were pushing a legislation
in both the House and the Senate. Schumer led it
in the Senate, AOC led it in the House. They
wanted Clarence Thomas to be impeached. I'm not talking on

(26:46):
a social media post or you know, in an email.
I'm talking about literally introducing legislation to force Thomas off
of the Supreme Court. Didn't open his mouth, did an
issue a statement, or when they wanted to pack the
Supreme Court which would have destroyed the Supreme Court effectively,

(27:09):
he didn't open his mouth. But now all of a sudden,
he has to open his mouth against Trump. He's compromised.
Jack Roberts is not doing anything for the integrity of
the judicial branch. He's being obviously blackmailed, he's being compromised,

(27:31):
and now he's joined the resistance against Trump. Final word
to you, Jack.

Speaker 5 (27:38):
Jeff, I'll agree with those points, but he's never been
on our side. We know that he's never voted our way.
So I agreed to that. But I said, it's definitely
two separate issues. That's all I'm saying. It's definitely two
separate issues.

Speaker 1 (27:51):
So you're saying to ignore him, but he should not
have called for him to be impeached, correct.

Speaker 5 (27:55):
Jack, I know him, Yeah, just like Joe Biden. But
Joe Biden was ever going to be childnged. But Joe
Biden never called me. I don't think other press.

Speaker 1 (28:05):
Six one seven, two, six x sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. This is a really good point from
Mark on Messenger, Jeff. Not one judge blocked any of
the Biden administration's policies or decisions or executive orders to
do whatever the hell they wanted, which by the way,

(28:27):
were mostly illegal, except when the Supreme Court told Biden
he could not forgive student loans, but Biden ignored it
and nothing was said. What freaking law school did these
judges go to, if they did at all, Well, it's

(28:49):
it's the school of destroy Donald Trump. Look, there's no question,
Judge Boseburg, this guy's not a judge. He's a Democrat active,
an open borders activist masquerading as a judge. He's got
a looney tune daughter. Okay, you want to talk about

(29:09):
a hardcore moonbat who works, as I said, for this
very far left open borders group, which by the way,
is funded by our taxpayer dollars. This is incredible and literally,
I'm not kidding. You can look it up. Her name
is Katherine Bosberg Boasberg, and they are dead set against

(29:33):
stopping Trump. They hate Trump, they revile Trump, but beyond that,
they want to stop all deportations of any single illegal,
including convicted felons and gangbangers. So they're saying, no, no trend.
De Aragua should not be deported.

Speaker 5 (29:52):
MS.

Speaker 1 (29:52):
Thirteen. Absolutely not. You can murder as many people, you
can rape as many young girls like Joycelyn Nungari, you
can raper two men repeatedly and then dismember the body,
you can murder Lakenriley, you cannot deport them. They literally
side with the most vile criminal illegal aliens and saying

(30:16):
that no person should be deported. That's the daughter of
this so called judge. And you're gonna tell me this
doesn't scream conflict of interest. I mean, this guy's a joke.
This whole thing is a joke. Six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay,

(30:38):
the text line on fire, fire fire, This is what
uh nine to one seven, writes Jeff John Roberts is useless.
Where are the Republicans? Where is Trump's support mechanism? It

(31:00):
seems that the only one doing the heavy lifting is
Donald Trump. He's out there all by himself. Of course,
of course, and look at that the disadvantage now that
Trump has Congress won't act. Republicans in Congress aren't going

(31:22):
to defend him, even though they could easily push back
these out of control judges, but they don't do a thing.
And now the left has succeeded in weaponizing the judicial system,
and these rogue judges now have essentially made themselves president,
so they can pretty much block anything Trump does, it

(31:43):
doesn't matter how well defined it is within the Constitution,
and just drag it out in the courts forever. So
essentially they're overthrowing the results of the election. That's what
that's essentially what's happening in front of our eyes. They're
trying to render the president a useless, pitiful giant. He

(32:10):
may be the commander in chief, he may be the
head of the executive branch, he may have won an
overwhelming popular mandate. What they're telling him is blank, you
some unelected, unaccountable, no name judge appointed by either Biden
or Obama or Clinton can overrule the president on national security,

(32:37):
on foreign policy, on literally who he can fire and
not fire, who we can deport and not deport within
the executive branch. Ay ya yai. That would literally be
like a judge saying, no, you can't pass a budget
to Congress. Really, nah, you can't write a bit. Well,

(33:00):
what do you mean we can't write a bill? No, yeah,
I'm sorry. No, we're not gonna let you write the bill. Sorry, no, no, no.
You may think you have the right to pass a budget. Mom,
you know the power of the purse. You don't have
the power of the purse. We have the power of
the purse. They've got to be put in their place now,

(33:22):
or I'm telling you we're going down the road of
judicial tyranny. It's so obvious to me and that Roberts
would go out of his way and literally torch his credibility.
Whatever is left and it's gone after yesterday, it is gone.
It is gone. So he would burn up his own credibility,

(33:42):
burn it to the ground to defend Bosburg. What do
they have on him? That's what I want. He's clearly
being blackmailed. He's clearly compromised. You know my suspicion. I
think they've got him on Epstein Island. Okay, But whatever
it is is, Chief Justice John Roberts is no longer

(34:04):
a justice. He's now become a compromised, blockmailed, extorted hack.
He needs to resign asap. Larry in Leminster, thanks for holding, Larry,
and welcome.

Speaker 5 (34:22):
Jeff.

Speaker 7 (34:23):
I gotta say, I'm starting to running tally of how
much talent all you wille be?

Speaker 1 (34:28):
Oh my god, well you got a headache there, Larry.

Speaker 7 (34:30):
Already, and you know not to disparage your first caller.
But yeah, he's wrong and he can desit there in
his wrongness. So anytime there's an argument, the easiest way
to counter it is to flip the script. Right, how
long has these rogue judges been going off the reservation

(34:52):
and become an activist and blocking presidents? How long has
that been going on? In two hundred years of judicial review?
If you want to play Robert's game.

Speaker 1 (35:02):
Yeah, no, it's it's extremely recent. It's very eacolate, very recent.

Speaker 7 (35:08):
And why does why did AOC want to get rid
of Thomas? What was her excuse? Not not the real reason,
but what was the excuse the lids were using.

Speaker 1 (35:17):
Well, that he took he took lavish gifts and that
they were unaccounted for, and his.

Speaker 5 (35:22):
Wife was.

Speaker 7 (35:26):
Running some you know, working with some conservative outlets, and
that was a conflict of indur. That's you get all
these kids of all these radical judges get to do
whatever they want. Oh hell, no, Roberts should just shut
up and sit down. Now here's a night. I appreciate

(35:47):
you giving me some leeway here. What is the only
thing keeping the judiciary in its current form?

Speaker 1 (36:03):
Well, I mean you mean the fact that they block
the Supreme the packing of the Supreme Court.

Speaker 7 (36:08):
No, no, no, no, all right, I'm sorry. I could
have said this better. If what if Trump, Holman, Bongino
all them gave the bird to the judiciary and just
started pushing out and get rid of all these people.

(36:28):
What would the judiciary do?

Speaker 1 (36:32):
Well, there's nothing it can do. It's toothless. That's the problem.

Speaker 7 (36:37):
Why we know this, But the mass is don't. That's
why they fall for this crap. When every time the
liberals say he's breaking orders and doing all this stuff,
the only thing is a gentleman's agreement that they will
abide by the like you said, the toothless judiciary. He

(37:00):
can start it today and start pushing him out today
and say give it a try, stop me. And but
what would it do? It was it would destroy the
judicial system when people, the mass is realized there's there's
nothing to it. It's all a farce. It's all just
basically a paper tiger. And lastly, this the cahona is

(37:22):
on this low ranking judge and say he's on the
same level as the president. Now, Jeff, we've discussed this.
I was in an aircraft mechanic, specifically on the one Hercules.
It's is a transport plane. Okay, let me give you
the best way to describe this. I'm back in the
air Force. I'm working on my plane. All of a sudden,

(37:44):
that bigger limousine pulls up. Trump jumps out and tells me, airman,
I need this plane ready to go. In an hour,
We're going to start dropping off all the trendea ragua
idiots off. Get this plane ready for me. What do
you think I would tell him? Oh, yes, sir, right yes,
right away, same thing. Judge pulls up in a little volvo,

(38:06):
jumps out and tells me I need this plane to stop.
President Trump from doing this, this and this. What do
you think I'd tell him?

Speaker 1 (38:12):
Blank off?

Speaker 7 (38:14):
Or what are you doing on my air airfield and
you're under arrest?

Speaker 1 (38:21):
Well, you know, Larry, look, I think you've summed it
up really really well. And no, I and you know, look,
you know you're right, You're completely right.

Speaker 4 (38:29):
Here.

Speaker 1 (38:29):
Let me let me flip it just a little bit.
What if I went to the president of iHeart and said, no,
you can't do what you're doing. Whatever decision he's made, okay,
whatever they're gonna I'm just making it up. Now they're
gonna buy another one hundred stations, just whatever, okay. Or
they fired people in San Antonio or laid off people.
I'm just making it up. Laid off people at stations

(38:50):
in Chicago because I Heeart's the biggest news radio cluster
in the country.

Speaker 5 (38:55):
I go, no, No, you can't do it.

Speaker 1 (38:57):
No, I'm sorry, I disagree with that.

Speaker 7 (38:59):
No, I don't.

Speaker 1 (39:00):
I don't think it was the right thing to do.
What would he say to me, rightly, because who the
hell are you?

Speaker 6 (39:05):
Man?

Speaker 1 (39:06):
Well, you know, I'm Jeff Cooner, Boston's bulldozer, and shut
up and stay in your lane. That's what he would say,
go on the air and do your show. Shut up.
I'm the CEO. I run the company. I make the decisions,
and if you know the shareholders don't like it, they
can remove me. I answer to the shareholders. I don't
answer to you. You're not my boss. What are you

(39:27):
at the same level as me who died and made
you ceo. That's literally what this judge is now doing,
and other judges like him. They're elevating themselves to president
of the United States, and they're behaving in a way
just as I said, you know if I said, you know,

(39:47):
because you know, they're not prevent They're now blocking him
from firing people. They're preventing him from a shutting down doach.
They're preventing him from cutting US four and EID. So
it would be like me, here, just take my analogy. No,
those cuts you made in San Antonio, No, you can't
do that because I said so. No, those stations you

(40:10):
shuddered in Chicago or no. You may think it's waste,
fraud and abuse. I disagree. I see people who are
laid off, they have jobs, they have families. You're gonna
have to reinstate them. He goes on, who's authority. Well,
because I'm Jeff Cooner. He said, get the hell out
of here, go fly a kite, hit the road. What
are you nuts? That's so and so all Trump did.

(40:34):
This is why I find a bit odd, Like, you know,
he's attacking the judiciary by calling for this clown to
be impeached. Suddenly, now he's attacking the whole judicial system.
But he's the president of the United States. Well, then
let him be president of the United States. The judge

(40:55):
is inserting himself in something that is none of his business.
That he doesn't have the authority, he doesn't have the jurisdiction,
he doesn't have the right, he doesn't have the power.
A judge cannot order the executive branch. A judge cannot,

(41:17):
as nude Gingrich said, We're gonna have judges now make
management and personnel decisions for the president of the United States.
He goes, are you serious? He goes, not only is
this a gross violation of separation of powers, but effectively,

(41:40):
these judges are now being a saying they're basically saying
I can overrule the president as he's doing his job.
I'm president, he's not president. Well, who elected you? It
doesn't matter I'm making myself president. And that's why here
I'll read Gingrich and then Larry, I want to get
I want you to get the last word in. Here's Gingrich,

(42:00):
and I think he hit a nail right on the head.
This is what Gingrich wrote on X quote. If Chief
Justice Roberts wants to minimize attacks on out of control
appointed left wing district court judges abusing their role and
claiming to be able to overrule the elected President of

(42:22):
the United States on management details that are clearly within
his role is defined by the Constitution and the Federalist Papers,
then he should intervene and overrule these absurd power grabs.
The Chief Justice can defend the court by overruling bad

(42:43):
judges before the executive and legislative branches start acting against them.
The burden is on the Chief Justice, not the president.
A thousand percent correct. In other words, stay in your
own lane, police your own judiciary, because they're in the

(43:06):
business now of the executive branch. They're trying to Clearly,
this is not just judicial overreach, this is sabotage. They're
trying now to sabotage and undermine it's law fair and
undermined and paralyze and cripple Trump's presidency, and so Roberts
right away needs to say no, I'm sorry, Hey, what
are you doing down there? You don't have the right

(43:27):
to do that. If he would overrule these outrageous judges,
then you wouldn't have this so called crisis. But you're
allowing them to usurp the power of the president and
the executive branch. Well, what do you think the executive
branch is just going to sit there and take it.

(43:48):
You think of any president, forget Trump any so a
president's gonna sit back and say, yeah, take away all
my power. Go ahead. Okay, you make personal not mean
you make the personal decisions. Okay, So you decide who
we deport? Yeah you not me? You okay?

Speaker 7 (44:04):
Hold on.

Speaker 1 (44:04):
So we can't get rid of USAID even though we
found all this fraud, even though it's under my control,
my purview. It's an agency under the federal under the
executive branch. Oh okay you so you're running the government now, Okay, yeah, sure.
So of course the legislative branch is going to push back.
Of course the executive branch is going to push back.

(44:26):
They'd be crazy not to. Am I wrong? Is Gingrich wrong, Larry, No.

Speaker 7 (44:34):
You're correct. While we're on that topic, really quick, this
judge stopping, it's gonna be judge shopping has to stop.
You know, you shouldn't. These Democrats should not be able
to go and search out these activist judges because that's
what's happening. We all know it, and that needs to stop.

(44:55):
These Again with your previous call, I'm not I don't
want to wait on the Supreme Court. Supreme Court has
not had the best track record of doing what's constitutionally
correct for the last since basically eight when Obama took over.
And I sent you I know this a little off topic,

(45:17):
but I sent you a topic an article about it.
Seems like there's evidence came out that Obama pushed to
have the current pope installed because he was a puppet. Yes,
I think that's what along the lines of who is
the original jig or Hoover was, you know, had all

(45:40):
that compromant on everybody to get his way. I think
that's what Obama's first term was, was setting up all
these puppets and using all this material to get people
to do their own thing. And he's still using it.
And you're right, Bongino, cash Metel, dig into it, use Doge,

(46:03):
use those computer geniuses, find out what they have on
Roberts and bounce them.

Speaker 1 (46:09):
I agree, Oh, Larry, I completely agree, Larry as usual,
thank you very much for that call. Look, there's clearly compremid,
as the Russians would say, Okay, whatever compromising material information
that they have on Roberts, there's no question.

Speaker 6 (46:24):
Now.

Speaker 1 (46:24):
I mean, this is so naked, it's so brazen, it's
so obvious, it's so egregious. So the question now is
what are Republicans willing to do? That's now the question
as usual six' one seven two six six sixty eight
sixty eight. Rick in the Great State of Tennessee. Thanks

(46:46):
for holding Rick and welcome.

Speaker 6 (46:48):
Thanks Jeff. Good morning to you. Hi. Let's remember back
in twenty twenty one, there were rumors swirling around Washington
about Justice Robert's illegal adoption of two Irish babies. It
was a well known fact that he and his wife
could not conceive. They were desperate to have children to

(47:11):
round out He and his wife are very strict, staunch Catholics,
Irish Catholics. They wanted to round out their family. They
couldn't do it. Because they were baronless. They were turned
down by apparently the Irish governor, the Irish Adoption Service,

(47:31):
and at that time, Ireland, and I think maybe it
still does, has some of the strictest adoption laws in
the world. You wait years to get into that system.
At any rate. The good justice he was, you know,
he was appointed by Bush in two thousand and five,
so he was on the bench. He desperately wanted these kids, rambam,

(47:56):
thank you, ma'am. About eighteen months later he gets these
kids via a Chilean adoption agency. So obvious, the question was,
how is it that he got around the Irish authorities,
adoption authorities and had to go to a Latin American

(48:19):
country to bring these children into the family. The two
children is a boy and a girl, Jack and Josephine.
There's a lot of photos on the Internet of them.
But like you say, yeah, he's being compromised. I don't

(48:42):
think it's because of his religious background. I do not
think his in his high profile, that he would have
been compromised by Jeffrey Epstein in the way that most
of us think Jeffrey Epstein compromised people through a sexual
honey honey trapped operation. I think that Jeffrey Epstein maybe

(49:05):
used his influence to facilitate this roundabout way of getting
justice Roberts his adopted Irish children.

Speaker 1 (49:15):
What do you think, Rick, That's what I want to
find out. I mean, they clearly have something on him.
I've heard those rumors about the adoption going back many
many years. I've also heard rumors now that apparently he
was on those flights on the so called Lalita Express
to what they called, you know, forgive me Orgy Island.

(49:35):
So there's when he rewrote Obamacare, that decision on Obamacare,
and the way he turned himself into a pretzel and
violated all of his so called previous principles and beliefs
to make, you know, to make they get Obamacare through
and to make it, you know, constitutionally pass Muster. I

(49:57):
knew something was up, and he's been getting worse and
worse and worse and worse. And I got a story.
By the way, you have to hear this regarding Boseburg
and Chief Justice John Roberts