All Episodes

January 29, 2025 • 35 mins
In the second hour of today's edition of Ryan Schuiling Live, Ryan talks about Donald Trump's decision to freeze all federal funding of NGOs, and discusses why he thinks it's a good idea.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Today, we are announcing that we have stopped all grant
funding that's being abused by NGOs to facilitate illegal immigration
into this country. So it's amazing to me the hundreds
of millions of dollars that have been spent by the
federal government that has been sent to NGOs to facilitate
this invasion of our country. So I've taken action to

(00:22):
stop those funds, to reevaluate them, and to make sure
that we're actually using the taxpayer dollars in a way
that strengthens this country, that keeps us safe.

Speaker 2 (00:31):
This is monumental news, and it was just breaking within
the last hour at a rush and grab that audio
clip from Christine home now the DHS Secretary Department of
Home Land Security, and she appeared with Will Caine on
Fox News to announce that her department, by her order,
has stopped all federal grant funding for NGOs facilitating illegal

(00:56):
immigration into the United States. Now, I am not big
on the abbreviations and acronyms when they're kind of coming
out of left field, and most of you heard the
term NNGO, but what that literally means. I like to
be very clear about what we're talking about. Non governmental organizations. Now,
this is a dicey topic for a lot of reasons,

(01:19):
and as I get into this, I want to sing
the praises of an NGO like Catholic Charities before we
get into the criticism of what is going on here
with this particular issue. And I want to be very
careful and very clear. There are not that many issues
where there's a lot of daylight between yours, truly and
Dan caplis the show that follows this one, and I

(01:41):
always affectionately say that this is the Dan Campalis pregame show.
I differ with him somewhat on the issue of abortion
in life. I feel that there should be as few
abortions as early as possible, and I heard an ad
actually during this program Glenn Beck, and I support it entirely.
I would like to empower women who are otherwise feeling powerless,

(02:04):
who feel like they don't have a choice, And that
was the presumption from the pro choice movement was that
you would have a choice, and one of those choices
is life. And I would like to prioritize life as
the first choice, an abortion as a last resort, and
that women should be counseled and feel like they're supported

(02:24):
and have available to them those services that an organization
like Catholic Charities provides to enhance the ability and encourage
the decision of life, whether that's carrying a baby to
term and giving it up for adoption for a couple
that cannot reproduce and they're desperately wanting a healthy baby.
I think that's wonderful keeping the baby for herself and

(02:48):
having that support system in place diaper's, food, etc. That
she doesn't feel like she's trapped and like I can't
afford this baby, I can't bring it into my life,
I can't take care of it. I want to do
what we can as a society to help prevent that
from being the only decision she feels she has is
that she's cornered into getting an abortion, and unfortunately, I

(03:11):
think the left, in my opinion, Planned parenthood, et cetera,
has made abortion not only the first option rather than
a last resort, but basically said that's the only option this.
Let's get an abortion, let's make some money off of it.
There's also the issue of the homeless, which Catholic Charities
does a remarkable work to prevent and then also to

(03:32):
treat those who would come into their care. I remember
my visit to the Final four for the NCAA basketball tournament.

Speaker 3 (03:40):
I was covering the University of Michigan.

Speaker 2 (03:42):
At the time in San Antonio, Texas, and I noticed
there were no homeless anywhere. I'm like, I'm doing the
river walk, I'm in San Antonio. It's a clean, nice city.
And I asked a couple of locals, what's the story here.
I don't see any homeless people. And the fact of
the matter was that Catholic charities, the Catholic Church, faith,
the organizations. And this is the distinction, the delineation I

(04:02):
want to make in this conversation.

Speaker 3 (04:05):
To me, there is a big difference between somebody.

Speaker 2 (04:07):
Like myself, who I would say is Christian, but I'm
not overly religious. But I really support faith based organizations
privately funded like Samaritan's Purse from Franklin Graham and doing
that good work, doing that Christian work of helping others.

Speaker 3 (04:26):
But where it gets a little bit.

Speaker 2 (04:28):
Sticky for me is when we cross that line between
faith based organizations that are privately funded and autonomous and
independent to non governmental organizations that now accept federal funding
for what they do and exchange for that federal funding,
What do they do, who are they beholden to, what
decisions are they making, why are they making them? And

(04:49):
when you blur those lines, I feel you get away from.

Speaker 3 (04:51):
What should be the true mission. That's my opinion.

Speaker 2 (04:55):
Catholic Charities does great work, So let's start with that
as the premise. This is an important issue, and it
is a difficult issue. And in my view, organizations NGOs
like Catholic Charities, but they're not alone, have a blind
spot here. And that's to put it kindly, if they
are aiding in a betting the breaking of our laws.
As I said earlier this week, Catholic doctrine does not

(05:17):
trump the American Constitution or the laws of this country.
In fact, it's the opposite. It's the reverse. Liberals always
want to separate church and state. Well, there, I am
doing it for you right there. I think faith based
organizations have a prominent role in helping with the homeless
and those who are downtroden, those who need help. But
when you're playing a shell game of moving illegals within

(05:41):
our country and helping them evade federal authorities, now I've
got a major problem with that. You we're circumventing American
immigration law and that needs to stop. And that's what
Christy Gnoma is getting at here, and she says it
a little bit more forcefully in this follow up with
Will Caine.

Speaker 1 (05:59):
I think people are curious when we look at grants
that are given out by federal agencies at how they're utilized,
and that evaluation needs to be done. We're not spending
another dime to help the destruction of this country. We're
going to make sure that we follow through on what
President Trump has promised, and that's to make sure that
we're securing our border, departing those who are here illegally
and committing criminal actions, and that our taxpayer dollars aren't

(06:22):
spending aren't spent to help it.

Speaker 2 (06:24):
And this has been a theme across the Trump administration
here as we're just over a weekend, is the transparency
of where is the money going, where is it coming from,
where is it going and why. Let's open up the books,
let shine daylight on it. Another theme for today, and
let's get to the bottom of where there is waste, fraud,
and abuse and if taxpayer dollars are being spent for

(06:48):
organizations to circumvent our immigration laws.

Speaker 3 (06:51):
That needs to stop.

Speaker 2 (06:53):
And if it's the power of the purse and Christy
Nome putting down the hammer here and saying you're not
getting another dime until we straighten all this out, I
think that's fair. I think that's right. I agree with
Christy Nome, I agree with President Trump. We'll get some
texts on this as well.

Speaker 3 (07:11):
But I know that Dan is very.

Speaker 2 (07:13):
Passionate about Catholic charities, and I admire that passion. I
support Catholic charities by and large.

Speaker 3 (07:20):
We have guests from.

Speaker 2 (07:21):
Catholic charities on this program and certainly on Dan's throughout
the year, but especially around the holidays. They do wonderful work.
They do God's work. But my hope is that any
organization I would be a part of, and Dan is
on the board, as many of you may know, for
Denver Catholic Charities, and that's fine, that's wonderful. He does
it out of the goodness of his heart. He is
one of the most generous men I have ever met

(07:43):
in my life, and I've known him for going on
seven years now. But sometimes you got to talk, frank,
straight talk with those who you love the most and
with whom you are closest and with whom you care about,
think something is going wrong and something is going awry,
and you have to be honest with a jaundiced eye

(08:05):
and say, look, I think your heart's in the right place. Perhaps,
but we can't do this. We can't facilitate, encourage, enable
illegals crossing our border to scurry about within the country
and evade federal immigration authorities and laws. There should be

(08:26):
cooperation with ICE, like we talked about earlier with Sheriff
Steve Reems. We need to all be on the same
page here. Who are we helping, why are we helping them?
What is the endgame here? What is the goal? My
goal for immigration for people that want to be in
this country would be that we simplify and shorten the
timetable on asylum processing, on granting that asylum or a

(08:51):
pathway to citizenship for those who come into the country legally.
If you came here illegally, sorry so sad, start over,
try again, go back to the border, do it the
right way, then we'll start the process because we're not
gonna let you skip the line. There are so many people,
so many people that I know personally, who have come
into this country and done it the right way and

(09:13):
gone through the proper channels and spent the money and
become American citizens and assimilate to our culture and learn
our language and adhere to our customs and laws, and
contribute to our society as hardworking members of it.

Speaker 3 (09:26):
But I don't want illegals.

Speaker 2 (09:28):
Here to be exploited in any way shape, manner of form.
We heard that bishop who was lecturing President Trump talking
about cleaning our toilets and picking our crops.

Speaker 3 (09:38):
What are you talking about? What are you driving at
with that?

Speaker 2 (09:42):
You want indentured servitude, You want something that resembles slavery,
a shade of that color. You want illegals here to
be paid lower wages and to undermine and undercut the
wages of hard working, blue collar, working class Americans in
this country. Well, they're doing the jobs that Americans don't
want to do. Let's test that theory out. Let's test

(10:03):
that theory out and see. Let's say an American who
has paid their debt to society, a felon who's having
a hard time getting a job and is set free,
but has that stigma of being a felon, of being
a convict, of serving time in prison hard time is
having a real hard time getting a job. It is

(10:24):
only made harder when we're allowing under the table cash
payments for undocumented workers without proper authorization or green cards
that are not on the books for W two's any
of that because an employer wants to make a cheap
buck and that as consumers we benefit from it. With
the blueberry smoothies that we talked about earlier, that is gross,

(10:45):
that is disgusting, that is exploitative, that is abusive for illegals.
That's why I don't want them here for their own good,
for their own safety, for their own welfare, for their
own well being. I want legal immigrants who are here
on an even less playing field, who have a chance
of success, who can be American citizens. I'm not anti

(11:06):
immigrant at all. I'm the son of an immigrant. I'm
the grandson of immigrants. I'm proud of my immigrant grandparents
and my immigrant mother. This is what we endured on
CNN with Jenna Arnold, the Democratic strategists and how they
view illegals. They are beneath them, they are gum on
the bottom of their shoes, only to provide them with

(11:27):
comfort and convenience.

Speaker 4 (11:29):
Picking strawberries.

Speaker 3 (11:30):
These are being hurt. I don't wait. Maybe I shouldn't
be here.

Speaker 2 (11:35):
I can't wait until American women can't get blueberries for
their movies. Wow, I cannot wait until there is a
full crackjawn on all small businesses.

Speaker 3 (11:48):
As if that's going to be the solution to the
immigration problem, it will be.

Speaker 2 (11:51):
It is just going to put immigration related issues further
into the darker corners.

Speaker 3 (11:58):
We're not going to see them.

Speaker 5 (11:59):
It's just going to become even harder to solve the problem.

Speaker 6 (12:02):
It doesn't make sense to punish individuals.

Speaker 5 (12:07):
And people when there is a broken system.

Speaker 3 (12:09):
You can't blame the system.

Speaker 2 (12:11):
No, you crack down now, like Scott Jennings said, and
he's absolutely right, you make it harder for business to
hire illegals. And guess what's going to stop happening the
hiring of illegals and the migration of illegals to our
boarder knowing that the Trump administration is going to turn
them away or make them remain in Mexico as they
await their asylum claims, it will be a disincentive to
come to this country. We don't want to set up

(12:32):
magnets and sanctuary cities and states to bring illegals here
to encourage that breaking.

Speaker 3 (12:38):
Of our laws. I want to encourage them to follow our.

Speaker 2 (12:41):
Laws, to go through that process, to wait their turn
in line, and know it's not perfect, and yes there
needs to be reforms. That's not an excuse or a
reason to just gallivan into our country, unfettered, unvetted. I'm sorry,
I can't get on board with that, and I won't.
I know many of you won't either. It's go to
this tax five seven seven three nine, Ryan, testify. It's

(13:04):
what I'm doing, and I appreciate you doing so as well.

Speaker 3 (13:06):
Thank you. Five seven seven three nine. Ryan.

Speaker 2 (13:09):
It's not just the birth, it's daycare. You can't work
in afford daycare and expect to get ahead. You're absolutely right,
And again one of the tiers of choices that I
hope to provide on the menu. The template for women
who have let's say, an unexpected pregnancy for whatever reason
is adoption, and you can put that child up for adoption.
There is such a demand for couples that cannot conceive,

(13:32):
or gay couples that want to adopt, and by nature
of their coupling, they can't do that naturally, but they
want to provide a home for a child, and they
want to love a healthy baby boy or girl. Well,
that's why adoption is another route. I think that is
preferable to abortion. But that's just me. I've just known
several women who have had abortions, and the ones I know,

(13:55):
while they're sane and they don't celebrate it, they don't
shout them out or whatever. They're not proud of it.
They're often ashamed of it. They feel tremendous guilt. It
lives with them for the rest of their lives. It's
not just over like planned parenthood, what have you believe
and you just can go on with the rest of
your life and forget about it. Most people with a
conscience are going to be thinking about that every day

(14:18):
for the rest of their lives.

Speaker 3 (14:19):
And so I would like to help again.

Speaker 2 (14:21):
Empower those people, those women, Ryan and the people say,
the people that say, if you don't have immigrants to
do the jobs at low wages, and then the cost
of blueberry skyrockets, not necessarily the market sets the price.
The blueberry skyrockets to twenty dollars a container, and no
one buys them, then the blueberry makers are going to
have to figure out how to get blueberries down to

(14:41):
ten or fifteen dollars. Let economics do what economics does.
Texture You are right on the money, free market economy,
that's how it works, supply and demand. If the supply
goes up to twenty dollars a container for blueberries, you're
exactly right, people are going to stop buying them, so
there's no demand, so the price will come down. The
profit margins, yeah, they'll be smaller. So innovation will dictate

(15:04):
that these farmers and ranchers and whoever else is looking
to exploit that illegal labor, they're going to have to
come up with a better way to do things, a
better system to produce those blueberries, or any crop, any crop,
any livestock, any of it. Ryan, how about immigrants, illegal
or not, are not allowed public assistance for five to
ten years.

Speaker 3 (15:26):
I get the premise of what you're.

Speaker 2 (15:28):
Saying, and I think there should be guidelines and obstacles
that if you're hearing this country illegally, you're not afforded
the rights and privileges and access to public services that
an American citizen is.

Speaker 3 (15:43):
Because think about it, for.

Speaker 2 (15:45):
Every illegal that has granted those services, they're not a citizen.
They're not taxpayers. They're not federal income taxpayers. They're not
by virtue of them being illegal. What tax forms are
they filing? What W two's are they filling out? How
is that working? You know it's not happening.

Speaker 3 (16:01):
They couldn't.

Speaker 2 (16:02):
The minute they did it. They don't have legal status.
They be shipped back, So we know that's not the case.
That's a fallacy, that's a ruse. But for every illegal
that is on the government doll that could have been
reserved for an American citizen. And yes, I want to
put American citizens first. This is why you see the
people of Chicago and urban centers, not a lot of them,

(16:24):
but a good number turning red, voting for Trump, figuring
it out. Eric Adams in New York City recognizes, we
have our own homeless problem, unemployment problems, mental health issues,
drug addictions of American citizens. We have enough to deal
with and take care of. I'm sorry, but again, if

(16:44):
there's no vacancy at the end, we have every right
to turn people away and say nope, not now, we
can't do it. Go through the proper channels. Ryan, don't
fall into the left wing trap. Biden's illegals are not
working in agriculture. They're in hotels and we're paying for them.
Many of them are not working at all, and they're
living off of welfare exactly. And that's the point I
was just making. And you're right, you know, it is

(17:05):
a fallacy. There is a number of migrant workers who
were here and maybe they're illegal. But I'll tell you this,
Greg Lopez, who I know quite well, he ran for governor,
he served in the House US House. He's a first
generation American. He and I have had those conversations. His
parents came to this country legally. They were migrant workers.

(17:26):
They worked picking berries. I believe, I'll ask him double
check on that. But in Michigan, in my home state,
where there's a big crop of that, from Traverse City
on down the western side of the state along Lake Michigan,
there's a big crop of those of various fruits and apples,
et cetera. And Greg Lopez' his parents did it the
right way. So you won't meet somebody who is more

(17:49):
passionate about enforcing our border laws than Greg Lopez. And
I think he's a tremendous example and source for this
sort of thing. Can someone on the radio mentioned the
biggest benefit of not aborting a baby, says this Texter,
not going to hell. I truly believe a sign saying
you will go to hell if you abort this baby
out every clinic would open a mother's eyes. I'll go

(18:11):
back to again. And if you heard it over the air,
I was very intrigued. I thought it was very effective
commercial with Glenn Beck. When you inform a woman and
you expose her to the sonogram, the heartbeat, you see
the baby moving visually. Now it's a person, it's a
little one. It's a baby that you don't want to

(18:32):
kill it. If it's just a clump of cells, as
the Left has tried to perpetuate that myth forever, then
it's a lot easier to make that consequential decision. But
when a woman is informed like no, no, that's a little
baby in there, I don't want to kill it, then
I think we're going down the road to what you're
talking about, Texter, and saving more lives than that should
be the bottom line. Take us time out, we'll come back.

(18:53):
We'll get to RFK Junior's testimony after this.

Speaker 7 (19:01):
I haven't been surprised by anything now, I mean, he's
been doing essentially what he actually campaigned on that he
announced he is going to pardon the Jay six individuals.
He is going to absolutely go after the border. So
there's a lot of things that he's already ran on.
I mean, criticize a lot of it, and I don't
agree with everything either, but it's undeniable. He actually ran

(19:23):
on that and been really upfront. He's like, I am
your reputation and he's, you know, kind of making those moves.
So that's kind of where we're at. Early on, immediately
after the election, I was like, hey, you know, we
have a choice. You know, we can freak out and
follow every other thing around, you know, like a cat,
you know, with a laser of right after he one.
But I'm not that guy.

Speaker 3 (19:44):
I'm not going to be that Democrat. You know.

Speaker 7 (19:46):
For me, there's things I'm going to agree with, I'm
going to disagree with, but I'm in the business of
finding wins for Pennsylvania and for the nation and engaging
the president. I think I see that as doing my job.

Speaker 2 (19:58):
That was on the view Senator John Fetterman telling them
some things they probably didn't enjoy hearing. They can't figure
him out and that's why I like the guy, and
I wouldn't be surprised if he wins by about ten
points next time around when he runs for reelection.

Speaker 3 (20:12):
I would rather have him in there.

Speaker 2 (20:14):
With Dave McCormick if he had to split the two
Senate seats for Pennsylvania purple State, one Republican, one Democrat,
than keeping in place the senator that Dave McCormick defeated,
rather than Fetterman as a Democrat five seven to seventy
three nine. Lots of texts coming in no surprise reacting
to the news at the top of this hour that
Christy Nome, the new DHS secretary, announced that federal funding

(20:37):
for NGOs will be halted as they review what's being spent,
what it's being spent on, and what the NGOs are
doing to facilitate illegal immigration into our country. Tremendous move.
Another one, this headline from CNN. I'm looking at it
right now. Trump to prepare Guantanamo Bay to house thirty
thousand illegals. Now they say migrants, but that's deceptive. No

(21:02):
legal immigrant will be deported period. I mean, what an
absolute lie to put that in thereant They're not migrants.

Speaker 3 (21:10):
They're here illegally. They broke our laws to come here.

Speaker 2 (21:14):
And that's it. That's the start, that's the end, that's
the alpha, that's the omega. Want to get to RFK Junior.
And he whired the Democrats losing. This has been a
common threat ever since Trump was inaugurated, and of course
since he won back on November fifth, and there's been
the post mortem analysis of, Wow, why did the Republicans
win the Senate, the House, and the presidency. Why did

(21:35):
Donald Trump win in historic fashion, come back of the century,
if not all time in politics?

Speaker 3 (21:42):
Why did he win the popular vote at all?

Speaker 2 (21:44):
It's very difficult for a Republican these days to win
the popular vote with the urban centers being so blue,
like New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, and to overcome
that by just kind of drumming up the rural vote
or suburban vote. That's impossible to overcome. And yet Trump
did it because he ate away at the margins in
those cities. But one of the reasons is Democrats just

(22:06):
aren't cool anymore. And I'm not just saying that flippantly,
but Bill Maher said this that all of a sudden,
Republicans are the cool kids, and Trump is cool, and
how did that happen?

Speaker 3 (22:16):
Well, for us, it's very easy to figure out how
that happened. Donald Trump is relatable.

Speaker 2 (22:21):
People in Middle America, farmers, ranchers feel like Donald Trump
cares about a person like them.

Speaker 3 (22:25):
And if you would have told me that forty years ago.

Speaker 2 (22:28):
When Trump was kind of at the ascent of his
real estate mogul status, taking over the business for his father,
building the skyline of New York City in the eighties,
being the kind of it guy with popular culture and media,
his affair and then marriage with Marla Maples, all of that.
I mean, this guy was metropolitan. There was nothing rural
about Donald Trump at all. He was the ultimate urbanite.

(22:51):
And yet here he is all these years later, and
people that I know, who I grew up with in
rural America love this man.

Speaker 3 (23:00):
Well.

Speaker 2 (23:00):
On the other side, we've got a bunch of school
marm scolds telling us what to do, telling us what
not to do, trying to boss us around, making us
feel like if we don't assimilate to their every whim,
then we're going to be on the outs. And then
people just stop caring about what Karen's said. One of
those was Pocahontas today, Senator Elizabeth Warren, the historyonics, the emotion.

(23:24):
This does not help your cause, Senator Warren. But listen
to exchange here with RFK Junior.

Speaker 4 (23:30):
Oh By, with all the ethical guys, that's not the
question you and I.

Speaker 3 (23:35):
You have said you're asking me.

Speaker 4 (23:37):
You're asking me not to vaccine company. Yeah, you are.
That's exactly right you're doing.

Speaker 6 (23:45):
Look, no one should be fooled here of AHHS.

Speaker 5 (23:52):
Robert Kennedy will have the power to undercut vaccines and
vaccine manufacturing across our country. And for all of his
talk about follow the science and his promised that he
won't interfere with those of us who want to vaccinate
his kids, the bottom line is the same. Kennedy can
kill off access to vaccines and make millions of dollars

(24:16):
while he does it.

Speaker 3 (24:17):
Kids might die, but Robert.

Speaker 5 (24:19):
Kennedy can keep cashing in.

Speaker 6 (24:22):
The Senator, I support vaccines, will I will support the
childhood schedule.

Speaker 4 (24:29):
I will do that. The only thing I want is
good science and that's it.

Speaker 5 (24:34):
How about Finn say you won't make money off what
you do as Secretary of HHS.

Speaker 2 (24:38):
Where were these questions for all of Biden's nominees who
were making money like I don't know.

Speaker 3 (24:43):
Lloyd Austin and Raytheon.

Speaker 2 (24:45):
I mean, establishment types are the status quo they got
us where we are tremendously in debt, budget deficits galore,
corruption galore. I'm still trying to square the far left
argument Senator Warren, Senator Bernie Sanders. There's a funny quote
from him coming to about they're against big pharma. Okay,

(25:07):
so they agree with RFK Junior on that they believe
there's corruption involved in big pharma and their pricing of pharmaceuticals.
I'm not totally against what they're saying in their argument
to that degree. I mean, I'm a populist and I
would like to there to be more competition in pricing.
Donald Trump talked about this the first time that he ran,

(25:27):
that you should be able to compete against county state
lines and against what's being offered in Canada across that line,
and that there shouldn't be manipulations of the prices where
we're paying twice, three times, ten times as more much
for medicines that are purchased across the world for far less.
So I'm all on board with that so they say that,

(25:47):
but at the same time they're saying, no, don't question
the vaccines or anything about what big farm is doing.

Speaker 3 (25:53):
With the research and development of those.

Speaker 4 (25:54):
Wait, what.

Speaker 2 (25:56):
Do you question them or do you not? I support
RFK Junior asking questions. I don't agree with everything that
he says, but I like the spirit of RFK Junior
because he's independent in that mindset, He's not beholden to anybody. Now,
Liz Warren was trying to press down on a commercial
that he did that was promoting some kind of pharmaceutical lawsuit,

(26:18):
I think, and that she wanted him to promise that
he wouldn't profit on it, on that sort of thing
while he.

Speaker 3 (26:24):
Was secretary of AHHS or for four years.

Speaker 2 (26:26):
After that, he promised that during his tenure, if he
is confirmed, which I believe that he will be, during
his tenure as AHHS secretary, he would not indulge in
that what would be a complict of interest in making
money off of that. But he stopped short of saying
he would not pursue lawsuits and thereby profit from those
lawsuits against Big Pharma. And I don't know, I think

(26:47):
they were quibbling over some rather random details but nothing
takes the cake. Now, just to set the scene for
this in the backdrop, Senator Bernie Sanders, he's really upset
that an organization that RFK Junior started on their website
had one Zies for Babies that said, I'm proudly anti
vax or novaks for me or things of this nature.

(27:09):
And RFK Junior just said, and I believe him, and
I believe the same that he supports the basic schedule
of vaccines that have been proven through trials and a
case evidence over many decades. Now you know the polio vaccine,
the measles vaccine MMR, you know mumps and rebella, all

(27:31):
of that he's on board with. But there are some
vaccines that are now on the schedule. I don't even
know how many vaccines a baby gets. I know, when
I was a little guy fifty years ago, it was
basically what I just said. But now there's a whole
other kind of template of vaccines that are available. Kelly
might know more about this than I do. Is a
mother of gen zers. Do you know approximately that number,

(27:54):
Kelly of the vaccines that were available to you for
both Trevor and.

Speaker 3 (27:58):
Haley, they took six, so six.

Speaker 2 (28:01):
That's I think that's what you and I probably got
right back in the seventies.

Speaker 8 (28:04):
I don't know about that. Chicken pox wasn't invented yet,
but there.

Speaker 3 (28:09):
Wasn't a chicken pox vaccine.

Speaker 2 (28:10):
You had chicken pox parties, so kids would get together
and spread it and then you'd be immune to it.

Speaker 8 (28:14):
And I did do that because my mother was Mother
of the year.

Speaker 3 (28:18):
Yeah, little did we know that could lead to shingles
later in life. But anyway, so.

Speaker 2 (28:21):
I thought that the schedule of what they recommend, like
you have a baby is somewhere in the teens.

Speaker 3 (28:26):
Or higher than that.

Speaker 8 (28:28):
So when you're a baby and you first you know,
birth of baby, you get three.

Speaker 3 (28:34):
You get three or the baby gets three.

Speaker 8 (28:36):
Baby gets three, baby gets three yep. And then throughout
the years they I believe it's MMBR YEP is the
big one that they that they do. But later on
is when you get chicken pox and when you can
get the uh one fork anchor soars and yeah.

Speaker 2 (29:03):
But what I'm saying is where I support r FFK Junior,
is if we don't have enough case study, evidence and
controlled experiments, et cetera data basically on some of these
newer vaccines.

Speaker 8 (29:14):
Then we certainly don't. We don't have anything on covid.

Speaker 3 (29:17):
And he was right about covid.

Speaker 2 (29:19):
Yeah, it did not prevent us from getting infected or
transmitting it, and we were told that it did, and they.

Speaker 3 (29:24):
Couldn't know that.

Speaker 2 (29:25):
They didn't know that, and they lied to us anyway,
Bernie Sanders, he's really mad about these onesies.

Speaker 3 (29:32):
You gotta hear this. We are you of all these onesies?

Speaker 6 (29:36):
I'm supportive of vaccines. Are you supportive of all these
this clothing which is militantly anti vaccines?

Speaker 4 (29:43):
I am supportive of vaccines. Well, I want good science
and I want to protect but you will knock out.

Speaker 2 (29:51):
I don't want you putting a baby in the onesie
that says don't get a vaccine. I got to hear
that again, you of these onesies. And then RFK Juniors
cracking up. Megan Kelly was there too. She was seated
directly behind Cheryl Hines. You might remember from Kirby Your

(30:12):
Enthusiasm that's the wife of RFK Junior RFK J.

Speaker 3 (30:15):
I mean Megan.

Speaker 2 (30:16):
Kelly's dying at this of these ones Yes, I love
onesies because it's it's easy clean up the kid barbs
on themselves, just change them out, but not these onesies.
I needed that laugh. I hope you enjoyed that as well.
We'll take this time out. Got many more texts for
you to get two five seven, seven, three nine. Kelly's

(30:37):
back on board for the rest of the ride too,
so we'll get her thoughts. At input the ze man
behind the scenes that identifies everybody affiliated with the show,
including you on Ryan schuling life.

Speaker 6 (30:51):
Question for you, are you conspiracy theist? That is a
pejorative centator that's applied to me.

Speaker 4 (31:01):
Mainly to keep me from.

Speaker 6 (31:03):
Asking difficult questions.

Speaker 4 (31:05):
A powerful interest.

Speaker 6 (31:07):
I was told that I was a conspiracy theorist. That
label was applied to me because I said that the vaccines,
the COVID vaccine didn't prevent transmission and it wouldn't prevent
infection when the government was telling people Americans that it would.
I was saying that because I was looking at the

(31:27):
monkey studies. In May of twenty twenty, I was called
a conspirat.

Speaker 4 (31:31):
Now everybody admits it.

Speaker 6 (31:33):
I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said red
dye caused cancer, and now.

Speaker 4 (31:38):
FDA has acknowledged that and banned it.

Speaker 6 (31:41):
I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said.

Speaker 4 (31:45):
Floor I'd lowered IQ.

Speaker 2 (31:47):
And it's a convenient that the FDA just happened to
ban that red dye right before RFK Junior might assume
the post at AHHS and I believe he'll be confirmed.

Speaker 3 (31:56):
And he was right about the COVID shot.

Speaker 2 (31:58):
Kelly, you kind of came in late, so I believe
you missed the Chuck Schumer, Marvin Gaye, duet.

Speaker 8 (32:04):
Oh, I saw it.

Speaker 2 (32:05):
What do you mean saw it? Well, you've seen it.
I put it together. I constructed this. Oh, this is
a remix for you and everybody out there in case
you missed it.

Speaker 3 (32:15):
You ready, Okay? Wow, people are aroused.

Speaker 9 (32:22):
I haven't seen people so aroused in a very very
long time. People are aroused. I haven't seen people so
aroused in a very.

Speaker 3 (32:34):
Very long time.

Speaker 8 (32:37):
Let's get it all.

Speaker 3 (32:39):
People are aroused.

Speaker 9 (32:40):
I haven't seen people so aroused in a very very
long time.

Speaker 10 (32:44):
Oh yeah, okay, So, but I saw on Twitter was
with not Marvin gay It was somebody else, but it
was on the same lines.

Speaker 8 (32:55):
But that one's far more superior.

Speaker 2 (32:57):
I hate to bury this, but Patty's asking, did I
miss Kelly's naked story.

Speaker 3 (33:02):
She wasn't around to tell it, so I don't want
to tell you. Oh, you only got a min and
a half here, can you do it?

Speaker 5 (33:07):
No?

Speaker 2 (33:07):
All right, we'll save it for tomorrow. Wow, we got
to punt it twice. That's not fair to the listeners.
This texteror asks, or says, ask parents whose children were
progressing at a normal rate.

Speaker 3 (33:17):
Until they were vaccinated. Then they became either.

Speaker 2 (33:20):
Nonverbal, failed to progress at the rate they should, or
exhibit other affectations or behaviors that are.

Speaker 3 (33:25):
Not normal for children.

Speaker 2 (33:27):
Doesn't happen to every child, But as RFK said, not
all vaccines are safe and effective for everyone. Some people
are more sensitive. Asking questions should not be verboten. Exactly right,
And he's right too. When I was growing up I'm
fifty at gen x er. Growing up in the eighties
and nineties, I didn't know a single of my classmates
who had a peanut allergy.

Speaker 3 (33:46):
That didn't exist. It didn't exist, and now it does.
It's all over the place.

Speaker 2 (33:50):
Every one of URFK Junior's kids has a penatalergy. Why
are we not allowed to ask that question? I think
we should.

Speaker 8 (33:57):
You know, that's a really good question. Yes, because Christopher,
my sisters or nephew. Yep, yep, my nephew has a
peanut allergy and he never had one until he.

Speaker 2 (34:08):
Was like ten. There it is. And my niece Mila
severe peanut allergy. My mom got in trouble for giving
her Snickers bar when she was little. This textor says,
that's why all these kids are autistic. They never gave
you all these different vaccines together, too many, too close together.
RFK is not wrong to question it. That's another one.
Why are so many kids on the spectrum?

Speaker 5 (34:29):
Now?

Speaker 3 (34:29):
What explains that?

Speaker 8 (34:30):
Well, first of all, it could be environmental.

Speaker 2 (34:33):
There's some of that over stimulation, I think, and RFK
Junior talked about that today with video games, social media,
all these contagions correct that are social and otherwise. However,
I don't think it's wrong to ask questions and to
demand scientific data and to encourage studies along those lines.
I think RFK Junior is an honest broker. I think
he's a good man. I've always said that on this show,

(34:54):
and I believe he'll be confirmed and should be confirmed,
and America will be healthier for it. Dan Kaplis Show next.
Thanks for tuning in today. My thanks to Zach and
Kelly and to all of you for listening. Back with
more Ryan schuling live tomorrow
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season
Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.