February 25, 2025 • 26 mins
(February 25,2025)
Mayor Bass is getting criticism for ‘misrepresenting the facts’ in the firing of Fire Chief Kristin Crowley. Trump, Putin, and the 3-year Ukrainian war. Newsom launches digital democracy tool called ‘Engaged California’ describing it as ‘a townhall for the modern day.’ Save the postal service.
Mayor Bass is getting criticism for ‘misrepresenting the facts’ in the firing of Fire Chief Kristin Crowley. Trump, Putin, and the 3-year Ukrainian war. Newsom launches digital democracy tool called ‘Engaged California’ describing it as ‘a townhall for the modern day.’ Save the postal service.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
six forty. That's good. You are listening to the Bill
Handle show. You tell me how you and that.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
You at KFI AM six forty Bill Handle. It is
a Tuesday morning Taco Tuesday.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
February twenty five.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
If anybody has any doubts whatsoever that Karen Bass is
a political animal, I do not have any doubts but
Karen Bass being a political animal.
Speaker 1 (00:42):
She won the mayor oralty simply because she's a Democrat.
What's that? No other reason?
Speaker 2 (00:47):
Because when Caruso, Paul Caruso ran, they both were on
the same page. The only difference is he has vast
experience as a business person, is an administrator of the
first order, and Karen Bass is simply political. How do
I know, Well, let's look at what she just pulled off,
(01:09):
firing Kristen Crowley has had the LA Fire Department. Now
we start with Karen Bass promising she would not travel
to Africa when she ran for office. I will not travel.
Where was she when the fires broke out? Strangely enough,
(01:29):
in Africa?
Speaker 1 (01:31):
Karen Bass says. The reason she didn't.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
Know the fires were going to be this bad this
devastating is because Crowley did not tell her. That's the reason,
even though the National Weather Service had reported days earlier
that this fire it's going to be a life threatening
(01:55):
situation because of the potential of fires because the winds
were so high. So I guess by implication, Karen Bass says,
no one in the Mayor's department looks at the National
Weather Service at all.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
They ignore it.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
And it's the fire chief that has to tell the
Mayor's office that there is a problem. So Karen Bass,
who's already admitted it was a mistake to go to Africa,
knows about the fire, or should have known, decides to
stay in Africa until the next day after the fires
break out, And she's blaming Crowley and why Crowley is
(02:34):
being fired because of a lack of leadership, and it's
in the best interests of the City of Los Angeles
to can her And she cited report that's Bass that
fire officials decided not to assign about a thousand available
firefighters and dozens of water carrying engines for emergency deployment
(02:54):
in the Palisades. Okay, what the United Firefighters of LA
have said, and that is the biggest union. She was
dismissed without a full investigation, and they went on.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
We still have.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
Nearly one hundred broken down fire engines, trucks, ambulances in
the maintenance yard because of civilian mechanic job cuts.
Speaker 1 (03:17):
And who cut the budget.
Speaker 2 (03:20):
Of the fire department Why, strangely enough, Karen Bass cut
tens of millions of dollars. But it's Crowley's fault. I mean,
what a cheap shot at just pushing the blame on
someone else. Just suck it up and say, yeah, we're
(03:41):
gonna investigate before I'm at a can Crowley. We're going
to see what happens. Now, Crowley has the ability to appeal.
She's got ten days to appeal her firing, and that
can be overturned by two thirds of the city council.
City council in la is one of the strongest city
councils of any major city in the United States. They
(04:01):
wield enormous power and they can overturn the firing even
though the mayor has the ability to fire department heads.
And we'll see what happens. Lack of leadership. Really, I'll
tell you where lack of leadership is going to hit.
And I think that if Karen Bass loses the next
election her second term, which I hope she does, because
(04:26):
she's just throwing She's looking for a scapegoat and she
found it with a fire chief. I think this is
going to hurt her big time as it should. Just
suck it up, you know, just say hey, you know
I blew it. You know I made a mistake. It's
going to hurt her in the next election. But I
think the defense is I'd like to meet anybody who
(04:49):
has not made a mistake, have them come up here
and argue they have led an exemplarily an exemplary.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Political or professional.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
Wife, never made a mistake. I think that's a terrific defense.
God forbid honesty. And the problem is what she's doing
is so hamhanded, so ridiculously transparent. Somehow people are going
to agree with her. Oh yes, we don't need an investigation.
(05:23):
Karen Bass is absolutely right. She has nothing to gain,
She has no skin in the game, really, so I'm hoping,
hoping that Kristin Crowley does appeal. Here's the other problem though,
and I would think, and I put myself in the
shoes of Kristin Crowley, is even if I get the
(05:45):
city council to reinstate me. I still have to have
a relationship with Karen Bass, and can you imagine how
poisoned that relationship is going to be, how tainted it's
going to be.
Speaker 3 (05:56):
You know what's a weird part of this bill is
there's so much talk about out whistle blowers and protecting
whistle blowers.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
Couldn't the chief be seen as.
Speaker 3 (06:06):
A whistle blower of sorts when she was saying, hey,
we were let down and the city has been let
down by.
Speaker 2 (06:14):
She No, she's not a whistle blower. A whistle blower
is usually anonymous. It talks about how horrible what's going on.
I guess you could argue that, but it wouldn't be
in this circumstances.
Speaker 1 (06:25):
She just went public.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
This is what she said in front of the news
cameras and said.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
Yeah, we failed the city, the city failed us. Oh
does that mean Karen Bass failed the city?
Speaker 2 (06:37):
Oh no, no, no, no, because Karen Bass had no
idea Because even though she promised not to be in Africa,
she was in Africa. By the way, it was for
the inauguration of the Ganadian president, the GANAD. What's the
plural Gannadian? Is it Canadians to be confused with Canadians.
Speaker 3 (07:04):
I'm not sure anybody knows that.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
I don't either, Yeah, Ganonese Canadians Canadians, not Guinea Guinesians
or Ganesians.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Yeah, I know, I know. You stop correcting me. Okay,
that's not your job, all right.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
Coming up, as I have told you, Oh, I don't know,
maybe two hundred times that whether Trump presidency, big changes
are coming have already come, and I think the biggest one,
certainly internationally, is Trump siding with Putin. Up to this point,
(07:43):
the United States has been firmly on the side of Ukraine,
even though there was some issues about supplying the latest
weaponry out there.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
The United States high high end weaponry.
Speaker 2 (07:56):
But for the most part, the Biden administration was very
pro Ukraine, as Europe has been. Now it's gone the
other way. Putin is the good guy as far as
Trump is concerned. The war in Ukraine was started by Ukraine.
Putin is not a dictator. Zelensky is a dictator, and
(08:22):
Putin and Trump are going to figure out the end
of the war without Ukraine being involved in any of
the discussion. Pete's talks, because what does Ukraine have to
do with that. This is between Putin and the president.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
So a little bit of history.
Speaker 2 (08:40):
One of the things that the president, our president wants
is basically out of NATO.
Speaker 1 (08:46):
NATO was created in nineteen forty nine.
Speaker 2 (08:49):
Because the fear of just the start of the Cold
War big time, and the fear was a Russian invasion
into Western Europe. There was a real fear of atomic
weapons being used launched first by Russia, the space race,
which Russia initially was winning, but the fear that Russia
(09:15):
far outpaced the United States and technology, certainly missile technology.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
In reality, Russia was.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
Basically only concerned with the space race and did not
have anywhere near the missile technology.
Speaker 1 (09:29):
Kennedy was the ultimate Cold warrior, just for your information.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
I mean, he came in and he stayed frightened, and
he wanted to bulwark against Russia.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Okay, so that's the background of NATO. NATO was created
to make sure Russia doesn't invade.
Speaker 2 (09:50):
The United States was the primary source of not only men,
but of money power, of money power and weaponry. Well,
as the years go past, you know, not so much
is Western Europe going to be invaded by Russia. Certainly
Ukraine was, but Ukraine is an outlier and comparison is Hitler.
(10:13):
Oh my, look what happened in Hitler in nineteen thirty
eight with the annexation of Austria and then the attack
of Poland.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
It's not the same.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
And the Western world at that time Europe just let
it happen because they were frightened and they wanted peace.
No matter what, It's a very different animal. Does anybody
you know here?
Speaker 1 (10:32):
It is? No one believed that what Hitler was going
to do.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
But is Russia going to attack any other country than Ukraine?
Ukraine not being a member of NATO, NATO of which
most of Western Europe, those countries are members of By
treaty Article five of a NATO treaty, an attack on
one is an attack on all, which means Europe is
(10:59):
committed to going to war with Russia in the event
of an attack on any of the NATO countries.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
Putin knows that.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
There is no sense that Europe would back down at all.
Is Putin able to successfully fight Europeans? He can't even
fight Ukraine. The number of men he has lost, the
amount of equipment he has lost, The economy is a mess.
(11:32):
All because of the war in Ukraine. Is he going
to expand that? I can't imagine it. Also, he has
since he has become President of Russia and the dictator,
and then even way way before when he was a
colonel in the KGB, in the spy services, he has
always maintained that Ukraine, at least the eastern part of Ukraine,
(11:55):
is part of Russia. It is part of Russia. He
doesn't think Germany is part of Russia. He doesn't think
France is part of Russia. He doesn't think Spain is
part of Russia.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
So what does he do? He goes to war.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
So here is President Trump saying we don't want any
part of it.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Russia effectively has to grow up.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
Russia relying on Europe has to grow up Europe relying
on the United States. Well, those days are basically done.
And our involvement in NATO is big time. A lot
of troops, for example, in Germany. Why are there troops
in Germany? Well to protect Western Europe from the Russian invasion, which.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
At this point is kind of hard to believe. Maybe
I'm wrong, I have no idea.
Speaker 2 (12:46):
Maybe Putin is crazy enough to invade a NATO country
and go to.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
War with Europe, all of Europe don't know. My guess
is no.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
So Trump's position, and I think to a great extent,
he's right, Hey, it's time for us to stop being
the policeman of the world. Now for those of you,
and he's talking to Europeans, do you want that kind
of security?
Speaker 1 (13:11):
You guys do it? Don't rely on us anymore.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
And the reality is Europe has relied on the United
States as a default. They'll take care of us, the
US will take carebus. So I think that's a legitimate argument.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
I do.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
There are many people that think, in the amount of
money we spend the defense of Europe, is it really
are battle? I mean, it will be if it turns
out that Russia invades any one of the NATO countries.
And how you think Russia is going to do with
the United States as well as all the other European countries.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
The vast majority of Europe, you know, is proutent it
and go to war.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
You know, I doubt that. So Europe has to grow up.
Now you couple that, which is a legitimate stand. Whether
you believe it or not, you can't argue it's a
legitimate stand, at least in my opinion with the statements
that it's Zelenski who is the dictator Ukraine started the war.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
Putin is the nice guy, He's the good guy. Do
you remember during the first term where.
Speaker 2 (14:21):
Donald Trump said, I believe Putin more than I believe
seven All of the intelligence agencies in the United States,
all seventeen of them are liars.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
They are part of the deep state.
Speaker 2 (14:36):
Putin is the one who's telling the truth and said
he's a good guy. On top of that, you know
who's jumping up and down for joy Putin. He's getting
exactly what he wants. He's the big winner on this one. Now,
Trump may be considered the big winner in certain circles,
(15:00):
those who want the US out of Europe, but there
is no question to the extent that Donald Trump wins this.
Putin is on a whole different level in terms of
the wind, in terms of the win. All right, another
chapter in the digital aid. On Sunday, our Governor Gavin
(15:21):
Newsom announced an initiative, a new Digital Democracy initiative. And
what it's going to do is connect residents, all residents
in California who want to go online. It will connect
those residents directly with government officials in times of disaster
(15:44):
allow them to express their concerns. So how do normal people,
those of us who are not in government. What is
the way that we connect with our government officials? We
go to town halls, we write letters or now send emails.
(16:08):
We accost them on the street. That's the fun part,
bashing them on the street. We do it via the
news organizations who shove microphones in their faces.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
Well, most people don't have a chance.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
Keep in mind, California is what forty million people, I mean,
how many of us actually deal directly with our politicians.
So engaged California is going live with a focus on
adying victims of the wildfires and Pacific Palisades now Tadina
who are struggling to recover. And the comments shared online
(16:47):
well could potentially will prompt government action regarding insurance coverage,
for example, building standards, efforts to require utilities to bury
power to bury power lines. But herein lies the problem,
and that is already at town hall meetings, you get
disparate views. You get people in favor, people against any
(17:11):
proposed procedure and he proposed law.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
You get people that are.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
Saying you should change it. And these are the few
hundred people that show up. How does government deal with
millions or at least hundreds of thousands of comments coming
in newsom thinks it's going to help. Maybe, I don't know.
It seems like someone has to go through that. This
(17:36):
is actually modeled after a program like that in Taiwan,
and Taiwanese government loves this thing.
Speaker 1 (17:46):
It takes public.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
Comments and as a matter of fact, it actually acts
on public comments and they view it as pretty valuable stuff. Now,
the part that they do use or what they utilize
these town forums, this digital town forum in Taiwan, is
(18:07):
to stop the disinformation, just shut it. That I think
is incredibly valuable because there's so much.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Of that garbage going on, Because well, do we get.
Speaker 2 (18:20):
Our news anymore from normal news sources mainstream media, of course. Not.
Where we get our news is from the internet, from
crazy people. Well, these town halls the government is hosting,
it's online. It's the same mechanism, it's the same platform
(18:40):
that the crazy people use. And so to straighten out
crazy people and conspiracy theories, etc. What the government is
doing not just issuing press releases, not just going public,
they're going to the same source. They're fighting fire with fire,
and I think that one makes sense. I'm okay with that,
(19:01):
so join up and you two can be heard. Also,
talk radio used to be the mechanism where people could
affect change. This was the days before the Internet and
talk radio were people calling in. It was all about Collins.
Now your regular Joe, which I don't know why it's
(19:23):
a regular Joe. Why not regular George? Never figure that out.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
You could write a letter to the editor and how
many get printed?
Speaker 2 (19:31):
Right?
Speaker 1 (19:31):
Three?
Speaker 2 (19:33):
But you go on talk radio and you go ahead
and spout your views or did spout your views? That
was the mechanism because it was all about phone calls. Well,
those days are gone, and there is a way for
the regular Joe or George to go ahead and have
(19:54):
people listen, and that is via the internet now TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, whatever,
And unfortunately more influence is now.
Speaker 1 (20:08):
There is more.
Speaker 2 (20:09):
Influence from the crazy people than there are from the
normal people. The only thing I found TikTok I loved
was the cinnamon challenge that to me was the best
simply the best use of the Internet that.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
Has ever pinnacle, yes, pinnacle of the you bet it
is people coffing on cinnamon.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Oh yeah, it's just great.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
It's well worth looking up the cinnamon challenge. Okay, this
segment is about the US Postal Service. Now, government is
not particularly trusted by.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
The peoples of the United States. The Postal Service is.
Speaker 2 (20:53):
It's I think the country's most popular institution, approval rating
as high as ninety percent.
Speaker 1 (21:00):
Okay, some stats the USPS US Postal.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
Service delivers forty eight percent of the world's mail. Half
of the world's mail is delivered by the Postal Service
one hundred and sixty million homes. So now, what's going on, Well,
what happened in March, late March the post of this
(21:24):
last late March, the Postal Service struggled to deal with
the fallout of the pandemic.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
President Trump now threatens.
Speaker 2 (21:32):
To veto a version of a bipartisan Cares Act two
point two trillion dollars stimulus package that contained a thirteen
billion dollar grant to.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
The Postal Service.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
And the Post Service, saying we need it. We have
to keep meeting payroll, we have to gas our vehicles,
we have to pay suppliers.
Speaker 1 (21:55):
So what he.
Speaker 2 (21:56):
Finally signed was a ten billion dollar not a grant,
a loan to the Postal Service, which is a quasi
into independent agency of the United States, and the ten
billion dollars has to be approved by the Treasury Department. Now,
(22:16):
the Postal Service has been attacked by conservatives for years.
Trump has said the post Office is a joke. This
was on Friday, And what he wants to do, like
many Republicans, is a go privatization of the Postal Service.
And he keeps on saying that it is a mismanaged business.
(22:38):
And so what's being argued now the Trump administration now
wants drastic service facilities cuts, more non career labor, more
out sourcing, and a rollback of employee benefits, which, of
course that's across the board, that's not just Postal Service.
And well, the laws have gone south on the Postal Service.
(23:02):
In nineteen seventy, there was actually a wildcat strike that
lasted eight days, and so out of that the nineteen
seventy Postal Reorganization Act, and what it did is replace
the Post Office Department with this semi government, high bred
government agency and corporation, and it would provide collective bargaining
(23:25):
rights to employees they could unionize. It was supposed to
be financially self supporting and continue to provide universal service
at reasonable rates. And the Postal Service had to compete
with well now Amazon but FedEx UPS. But the difference
is if you live in normal Alaska, UPS doesn't deliver.
(23:45):
If you live in an igloo up in Burrough, Alaska,
which is the northernmost city in the United States, it's
just two feet below the north Pole, the US Postal
Service delivers. If someone lives at the bottom of the
Grand Canyon.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Do they have postal service? Yeah? Buy mule. Post service
still goes down to the bottom of the canyon, and
it's the only mule route that the Postal Service has.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
Airplanes that fly into these little tiny villages in Alaska
at a tremendous loss.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
It just costs more. The Postal Service just costs Is
that cost a time?
Speaker 2 (24:35):
By the way, the Postal Service was created before the
United States was Did you.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Know that, Ben Franklin, That was the postal service? Go figure.
Speaker 2 (24:46):
I like the Postal Service. I just hate what is
that first damp? A first class stamp now cost I
think what ninety three cents something like that. Although you
can go to costco and buy a roll.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
Is it that money? I think it is that high.
How much is it? Yeah, oh, it's seventy three cents,
So I got it.
Speaker 2 (25:06):
And they still lose money at seventy three cents. Where
they lose money, they might they make money on the
stamps first class, and they lose money in all that
third class crap.
Speaker 3 (25:20):
What Why is it a quasi government entity?
Speaker 2 (25:25):
It's because it's a government run. It's well, it's it
became an independent agency sort of because if it's a
government agency has to be funded one by the government,
and it brings in money, it should be a money
a money maker. Most agencies are not money makers. And
(25:47):
so it's just there was just a huge move to
privatize it completely, and I think it was a compromise,
just to compromise issue.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
That's my guess on this.
Speaker 2 (25:59):
All right, this is KFI AM sixty.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
You've been listening to the Bill Handle Show.
Speaker 2 (26:05):
Catch my show Monday through Friday six am to nine am,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
six forty. That's good. You are listening to the Bill
Handle show. You tell me how you and that.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
You at KFI AM six forty Bill Handle. It is
a Tuesday morning Taco Tuesday.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
February twenty five.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
If anybody has any doubts whatsoever that Karen Bass is
a political animal, I do not have any doubts but
Karen Bass being a political animal.
Speaker 1 (00:42):
She won the mayor oralty simply because she's a Democrat.
What's that? No other reason?
Speaker 2 (00:47):
Because when Caruso, Paul Caruso ran, they both were on
the same page. The only difference is he has vast
experience as a business person, is an administrator of the
first order, and Karen Bass is simply political. How do
I know, Well, let's look at what she just pulled off,
(01:09):
firing Kristen Crowley has had the LA Fire Department. Now
we start with Karen Bass promising she would not travel
to Africa when she ran for office. I will not travel.
Where was she when the fires broke out? Strangely enough,
(01:29):
in Africa?
Speaker 1 (01:31):
Karen Bass says. The reason she didn't.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
Know the fires were going to be this bad this
devastating is because Crowley did not tell her. That's the reason,
even though the National Weather Service had reported days earlier
that this fire it's going to be a life threatening
(01:55):
situation because of the potential of fires because the winds
were so high. So I guess by implication, Karen Bass says,
no one in the Mayor's department looks at the National
Weather Service at all.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
They ignore it.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
And it's the fire chief that has to tell the
Mayor's office that there is a problem. So Karen Bass,
who's already admitted it was a mistake to go to Africa,
knows about the fire, or should have known, decides to
stay in Africa until the next day after the fires
break out, And she's blaming Crowley and why Crowley is
(02:34):
being fired because of a lack of leadership, and it's
in the best interests of the City of Los Angeles
to can her And she cited report that's Bass that
fire officials decided not to assign about a thousand available
firefighters and dozens of water carrying engines for emergency deployment
(02:54):
in the Palisades. Okay, what the United Firefighters of LA
have said, and that is the biggest union. She was
dismissed without a full investigation, and they went on.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
We still have.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
Nearly one hundred broken down fire engines, trucks, ambulances in
the maintenance yard because of civilian mechanic job cuts.
Speaker 1 (03:17):
And who cut the budget.
Speaker 2 (03:20):
Of the fire department Why, strangely enough, Karen Bass cut
tens of millions of dollars. But it's Crowley's fault. I mean,
what a cheap shot at just pushing the blame on
someone else. Just suck it up and say, yeah, we're
(03:41):
gonna investigate before I'm at a can Crowley. We're going
to see what happens. Now, Crowley has the ability to appeal.
She's got ten days to appeal her firing, and that
can be overturned by two thirds of the city council.
City council in la is one of the strongest city
councils of any major city in the United States. They
(04:01):
wield enormous power and they can overturn the firing even
though the mayor has the ability to fire department heads.
And we'll see what happens. Lack of leadership. Really, I'll
tell you where lack of leadership is going to hit.
And I think that if Karen Bass loses the next
election her second term, which I hope she does, because
(04:26):
she's just throwing She's looking for a scapegoat and she
found it with a fire chief. I think this is
going to hurt her big time as it should. Just
suck it up, you know, just say hey, you know
I blew it. You know I made a mistake. It's
going to hurt her in the next election. But I
think the defense is I'd like to meet anybody who
(04:49):
has not made a mistake, have them come up here
and argue they have led an exemplarily an exemplary.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Political or professional.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
Wife, never made a mistake. I think that's a terrific defense.
God forbid honesty. And the problem is what she's doing
is so hamhanded, so ridiculously transparent. Somehow people are going
to agree with her. Oh yes, we don't need an investigation.
(05:23):
Karen Bass is absolutely right. She has nothing to gain,
She has no skin in the game, really, so I'm hoping,
hoping that Kristin Crowley does appeal. Here's the other problem though,
and I would think, and I put myself in the
shoes of Kristin Crowley, is even if I get the
(05:45):
city council to reinstate me. I still have to have
a relationship with Karen Bass, and can you imagine how
poisoned that relationship is going to be, how tainted it's
going to be.
Speaker 3 (05:56):
You know what's a weird part of this bill is
there's so much talk about out whistle blowers and protecting
whistle blowers.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
Couldn't the chief be seen as.
Speaker 3 (06:06):
A whistle blower of sorts when she was saying, hey,
we were let down and the city has been let
down by.
Speaker 2 (06:14):
She No, she's not a whistle blower. A whistle blower
is usually anonymous. It talks about how horrible what's going on.
I guess you could argue that, but it wouldn't be
in this circumstances.
Speaker 1 (06:25):
She just went public.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
This is what she said in front of the news
cameras and said.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
Yeah, we failed the city, the city failed us. Oh
does that mean Karen Bass failed the city?
Speaker 2 (06:37):
Oh no, no, no, no, because Karen Bass had no
idea Because even though she promised not to be in Africa,
she was in Africa. By the way, it was for
the inauguration of the Ganadian president, the GANAD. What's the
plural Gannadian? Is it Canadians to be confused with Canadians.
Speaker 3 (07:04):
I'm not sure anybody knows that.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
I don't either, Yeah, Ganonese Canadians Canadians, not Guinea Guinesians
or Ganesians.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Yeah, I know, I know. You stop correcting me. Okay,
that's not your job, all right.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
Coming up, as I have told you, Oh, I don't know,
maybe two hundred times that whether Trump presidency, big changes
are coming have already come, and I think the biggest one,
certainly internationally, is Trump siding with Putin. Up to this point,
(07:43):
the United States has been firmly on the side of Ukraine,
even though there was some issues about supplying the latest
weaponry out there.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
The United States high high end weaponry.
Speaker 2 (07:56):
But for the most part, the Biden administration was very
pro Ukraine, as Europe has been. Now it's gone the
other way. Putin is the good guy as far as
Trump is concerned. The war in Ukraine was started by Ukraine.
Putin is not a dictator. Zelensky is a dictator, and
(08:22):
Putin and Trump are going to figure out the end
of the war without Ukraine being involved in any of
the discussion. Pete's talks, because what does Ukraine have to
do with that. This is between Putin and the president.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
So a little bit of history.
Speaker 2 (08:40):
One of the things that the president, our president wants
is basically out of NATO.
Speaker 1 (08:46):
NATO was created in nineteen forty nine.
Speaker 2 (08:49):
Because the fear of just the start of the Cold
War big time, and the fear was a Russian invasion
into Western Europe. There was a real fear of atomic
weapons being used launched first by Russia, the space race,
which Russia initially was winning, but the fear that Russia
(09:15):
far outpaced the United States and technology, certainly missile technology.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
In reality, Russia was.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
Basically only concerned with the space race and did not
have anywhere near the missile technology.
Speaker 1 (09:29):
Kennedy was the ultimate Cold warrior, just for your information.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
I mean, he came in and he stayed frightened, and
he wanted to bulwark against Russia.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Okay, so that's the background of NATO. NATO was created
to make sure Russia doesn't invade.
Speaker 2 (09:50):
The United States was the primary source of not only men,
but of money power, of money power and weaponry. Well,
as the years go past, you know, not so much
is Western Europe going to be invaded by Russia. Certainly
Ukraine was, but Ukraine is an outlier and comparison is Hitler.
(10:13):
Oh my, look what happened in Hitler in nineteen thirty
eight with the annexation of Austria and then the attack
of Poland.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
It's not the same.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
And the Western world at that time Europe just let
it happen because they were frightened and they wanted peace.
No matter what, It's a very different animal. Does anybody
you know here?
Speaker 1 (10:32):
It is? No one believed that what Hitler was going
to do.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
But is Russia going to attack any other country than Ukraine?
Ukraine not being a member of NATO, NATO of which
most of Western Europe, those countries are members of By
treaty Article five of a NATO treaty, an attack on
one is an attack on all, which means Europe is
(10:59):
committed to going to war with Russia in the event
of an attack on any of the NATO countries.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
Putin knows that.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
There is no sense that Europe would back down at all.
Is Putin able to successfully fight Europeans? He can't even
fight Ukraine. The number of men he has lost, the
amount of equipment he has lost, The economy is a mess.
(11:32):
All because of the war in Ukraine. Is he going
to expand that? I can't imagine it. Also, he has
since he has become President of Russia and the dictator,
and then even way way before when he was a
colonel in the KGB, in the spy services, he has
always maintained that Ukraine, at least the eastern part of Ukraine,
(11:55):
is part of Russia. It is part of Russia. He
doesn't think Germany is part of Russia. He doesn't think
France is part of Russia. He doesn't think Spain is
part of Russia.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
So what does he do? He goes to war.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
So here is President Trump saying we don't want any
part of it.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Russia effectively has to grow up.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
Russia relying on Europe has to grow up Europe relying
on the United States. Well, those days are basically done.
And our involvement in NATO is big time. A lot
of troops, for example, in Germany. Why are there troops
in Germany? Well to protect Western Europe from the Russian invasion, which.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
At this point is kind of hard to believe. Maybe
I'm wrong, I have no idea.
Speaker 2 (12:46):
Maybe Putin is crazy enough to invade a NATO country
and go to.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
War with Europe, all of Europe don't know. My guess
is no.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
So Trump's position, and I think to a great extent,
he's right, Hey, it's time for us to stop being
the policeman of the world. Now for those of you,
and he's talking to Europeans, do you want that kind
of security?
Speaker 1 (13:11):
You guys do it? Don't rely on us anymore.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
And the reality is Europe has relied on the United
States as a default. They'll take care of us, the
US will take carebus. So I think that's a legitimate argument.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
I do.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
There are many people that think, in the amount of
money we spend the defense of Europe, is it really
are battle? I mean, it will be if it turns
out that Russia invades any one of the NATO countries.
And how you think Russia is going to do with
the United States as well as all the other European countries.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
The vast majority of Europe, you know, is proutent it
and go to war.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
You know, I doubt that. So Europe has to grow up.
Now you couple that, which is a legitimate stand. Whether
you believe it or not, you can't argue it's a
legitimate stand, at least in my opinion with the statements
that it's Zelenski who is the dictator Ukraine started the war.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
Putin is the nice guy, He's the good guy. Do
you remember during the first term where.
Speaker 2 (14:21):
Donald Trump said, I believe Putin more than I believe
seven All of the intelligence agencies in the United States,
all seventeen of them are liars.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
They are part of the deep state.
Speaker 2 (14:36):
Putin is the one who's telling the truth and said
he's a good guy. On top of that, you know
who's jumping up and down for joy Putin. He's getting
exactly what he wants. He's the big winner on this one. Now,
Trump may be considered the big winner in certain circles,
(15:00):
those who want the US out of Europe, but there
is no question to the extent that Donald Trump wins this.
Putin is on a whole different level in terms of
the wind, in terms of the win. All right, another
chapter in the digital aid. On Sunday, our Governor Gavin
(15:21):
Newsom announced an initiative, a new Digital Democracy initiative. And
what it's going to do is connect residents, all residents
in California who want to go online. It will connect
those residents directly with government officials in times of disaster
(15:44):
allow them to express their concerns. So how do normal people,
those of us who are not in government. What is
the way that we connect with our government officials? We
go to town halls, we write letters or now send emails.
(16:08):
We accost them on the street. That's the fun part,
bashing them on the street. We do it via the
news organizations who shove microphones in their faces.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
Well, most people don't have a chance.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
Keep in mind, California is what forty million people, I mean,
how many of us actually deal directly with our politicians.
So engaged California is going live with a focus on
adying victims of the wildfires and Pacific Palisades now Tadina
who are struggling to recover. And the comments shared online
(16:47):
well could potentially will prompt government action regarding insurance coverage,
for example, building standards, efforts to require utilities to bury
power to bury power lines. But herein lies the problem,
and that is already at town hall meetings, you get
disparate views. You get people in favor, people against any
(17:11):
proposed procedure and he proposed law.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
You get people that are.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
Saying you should change it. And these are the few
hundred people that show up. How does government deal with
millions or at least hundreds of thousands of comments coming
in newsom thinks it's going to help. Maybe, I don't know.
It seems like someone has to go through that. This
(17:36):
is actually modeled after a program like that in Taiwan,
and Taiwanese government loves this thing.
Speaker 1 (17:46):
It takes public.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
Comments and as a matter of fact, it actually acts
on public comments and they view it as pretty valuable stuff. Now,
the part that they do use or what they utilize
these town forums, this digital town forum in Taiwan, is
(18:07):
to stop the disinformation, just shut it. That I think
is incredibly valuable because there's so much.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Of that garbage going on, Because well, do we get.
Speaker 2 (18:20):
Our news anymore from normal news sources mainstream media, of course. Not.
Where we get our news is from the internet, from
crazy people. Well, these town halls the government is hosting,
it's online. It's the same mechanism, it's the same platform
(18:40):
that the crazy people use. And so to straighten out
crazy people and conspiracy theories, etc. What the government is
doing not just issuing press releases, not just going public,
they're going to the same source. They're fighting fire with fire,
and I think that one makes sense. I'm okay with that,
(19:01):
so join up and you two can be heard. Also,
talk radio used to be the mechanism where people could
affect change. This was the days before the Internet and
talk radio were people calling in. It was all about Collins.
Now your regular Joe, which I don't know why it's
(19:23):
a regular Joe. Why not regular George? Never figure that out.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
You could write a letter to the editor and how
many get printed?
Speaker 2 (19:31):
Right?
Speaker 1 (19:31):
Three?
Speaker 2 (19:33):
But you go on talk radio and you go ahead
and spout your views or did spout your views? That
was the mechanism because it was all about phone calls. Well,
those days are gone, and there is a way for
the regular Joe or George to go ahead and have
(19:54):
people listen, and that is via the internet now TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, whatever,
And unfortunately more influence is now.
Speaker 1 (20:08):
There is more.
Speaker 2 (20:09):
Influence from the crazy people than there are from the
normal people. The only thing I found TikTok I loved
was the cinnamon challenge that to me was the best
simply the best use of the Internet that.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
Has ever pinnacle, yes, pinnacle of the you bet it
is people coffing on cinnamon.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Oh yeah, it's just great.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
It's well worth looking up the cinnamon challenge. Okay, this
segment is about the US Postal Service. Now, government is
not particularly trusted by.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
The peoples of the United States. The Postal Service is.
Speaker 2 (20:53):
It's I think the country's most popular institution, approval rating
as high as ninety percent.
Speaker 1 (21:00):
Okay, some stats the USPS US Postal.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
Service delivers forty eight percent of the world's mail. Half
of the world's mail is delivered by the Postal Service
one hundred and sixty million homes. So now, what's going on, Well,
what happened in March, late March the post of this
(21:24):
last late March, the Postal Service struggled to deal with
the fallout of the pandemic.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
President Trump now threatens.
Speaker 2 (21:32):
To veto a version of a bipartisan Cares Act two
point two trillion dollars stimulus package that contained a thirteen
billion dollar grant to.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
The Postal Service.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
And the Post Service, saying we need it. We have
to keep meeting payroll, we have to gas our vehicles,
we have to pay suppliers.
Speaker 1 (21:55):
So what he.
Speaker 2 (21:56):
Finally signed was a ten billion dollar not a grant,
a loan to the Postal Service, which is a quasi
into independent agency of the United States, and the ten
billion dollars has to be approved by the Treasury Department. Now,
(22:16):
the Postal Service has been attacked by conservatives for years.
Trump has said the post Office is a joke. This
was on Friday, And what he wants to do, like
many Republicans, is a go privatization of the Postal Service.
And he keeps on saying that it is a mismanaged business.
(22:38):
And so what's being argued now the Trump administration now
wants drastic service facilities cuts, more non career labor, more
out sourcing, and a rollback of employee benefits, which, of
course that's across the board, that's not just Postal Service.
And well, the laws have gone south on the Postal Service.
(23:02):
In nineteen seventy, there was actually a wildcat strike that
lasted eight days, and so out of that the nineteen
seventy Postal Reorganization Act, and what it did is replace
the Post Office Department with this semi government, high bred
government agency and corporation, and it would provide collective bargaining
(23:25):
rights to employees they could unionize. It was supposed to
be financially self supporting and continue to provide universal service
at reasonable rates. And the Postal Service had to compete
with well now Amazon but FedEx UPS. But the difference
is if you live in normal Alaska, UPS doesn't deliver.
(23:45):
If you live in an igloo up in Burrough, Alaska,
which is the northernmost city in the United States, it's
just two feet below the north Pole, the US Postal
Service delivers. If someone lives at the bottom of the
Grand Canyon.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Do they have postal service? Yeah? Buy mule. Post service
still goes down to the bottom of the canyon, and
it's the only mule route that the Postal Service has.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
Airplanes that fly into these little tiny villages in Alaska
at a tremendous loss.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
It just costs more. The Postal Service just costs Is
that cost a time?
Speaker 2 (24:35):
By the way, the Postal Service was created before the
United States was Did you.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Know that, Ben Franklin, That was the postal service? Go figure.
Speaker 2 (24:46):
I like the Postal Service. I just hate what is
that first damp? A first class stamp now cost I
think what ninety three cents something like that. Although you
can go to costco and buy a roll.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
Is it that money? I think it is that high.
How much is it? Yeah, oh, it's seventy three cents,
So I got it.
Speaker 2 (25:06):
And they still lose money at seventy three cents. Where
they lose money, they might they make money on the
stamps first class, and they lose money in all that
third class crap.
Speaker 3 (25:20):
What Why is it a quasi government entity?
Speaker 2 (25:25):
It's because it's a government run. It's well, it's it
became an independent agency sort of because if it's a
government agency has to be funded one by the government,
and it brings in money, it should be a money
a money maker. Most agencies are not money makers. And
(25:47):
so it's just there was just a huge move to
privatize it completely, and I think it was a compromise,
just to compromise issue.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
That's my guess on this.
Speaker 2 (25:59):
All right, this is KFI AM sixty.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
You've been listening to the Bill Handle Show.
Speaker 2 (26:05):
Catch my show Monday through Friday six am to nine am,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
The Bill Handel Show News
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season
Daniel Jeremiah of Move the Sticks and Gregg Rosenthal of NFL Daily join forces to break down every team's needs this offseason.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.