April 19, 2025 • 44 mins
President Trump has a mountain to climb when it comes to fixing the United States of America. He also has a strong resistance to battle. Jesse Kelly identifies the resistance to help better understand what we're up against. Jesse then speaks with a variety of BIG names to discuss purging the resistance and the next steps.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 4-18-25
Beam: Visit https://ShopBeam.com/JESSEKELLY and use code JESSEKELLY at checkout for up to 40% off
Choq: Visit https://Choq.com/JesseTV for a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life
Pure Talk: Go to https://www.puretalk.com/JESSE to make the switch
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
Okay, let's have a talk about communist violence, why, how
the media presents it, how the media encourages it, and
things like that. But I'm gonna do a little experiment
with you first, all right, just a little experiment. It
involves no thought whatsoever, so don't worry about it. We're
just gonna do a first answer that pops into your head,
(00:32):
yes or no. Okay, it's a yes or no thing,
first answer that pops into your head. Let me ask
you something. Do you consider Captain America, the fictional character?
Do you consider him to be a violent man? I
asked that because most people their first answer to that
(00:53):
question is no. I mean, obviously he's running and jumping,
inviting and doing these things, but most people say no.
I'll tell you what. We'll come back to that, all right.
There's an interview that's been making the rounds. It's about
five years old, but it's a very very revealing interview.
AOC that loves your congresswoman from the Bronx is sitting
(01:14):
down with Megan Rappino, that the crazy feminist lesbian soccer player.
They're all sitting around having a lovely little chat about
how America is burning and crumbling. And there's a moment
in this I thought I would bring up for a
purpose of our conversation here, it was perhaps.
Speaker 2 (01:31):
We are in the downfall of the broken way. This
was not built to last. Inequity injustice is not built
to last. It lasts a long time, it could last
hundreds of years, but ultimately it crumbles into this, you know,
a small cohort of incompetent people that create damage, and
(01:58):
from that something new can spring. And so maybe something
is declining right now, but maybe it deserves to decline.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
Pretty revealing little moment. Maybe I haven't seen that clip before,
but I want to just point out again, like I
mentioned before, you see that when AOC described everything crumbling down,
everything you love, everything around you, she got that look. Well,
you're looking at it right now on the screen, that look,
that look that everyone knows. What is that look? That
(02:30):
is a look of satisfaction, A job well done. I
made the comparison when I pull a brisket off of
the smoker, if I've done it perfectly and I know it,
that is the exact look I get on my face.
I did it, job well done. Communists are violent by
(02:52):
their very nature because their religion is a religion of destruction. Always.
There's no end to the destruction either. Communists will try
to sell you on their communism by always promising that
they will build something new and lovely on the back end,
of course, and in a while we're gonna build something new.
(03:14):
Of course, that that never ever comes though. It's just
destroy everything all the time. And this could be so
hard for decent, good people to understand because they can't
they can't relate in any way to that way of thinking.
Who wants to burn down everything? I'll have people ask
me questions about the various things, former things that were
(03:37):
good that the communists have taken over, like the boy Scouts,
you know, the Boy Scouts, and now it's for women
and people, Jesse. Why would they come for the boy Scouts?
They come for everything everything. The communist looks around and
he sees things to destroy that you don't even notice,
things that you don't even notice. He looks and he sees, oh,
(04:02):
I bet I could burn that down. That's how he thinks.
It's very very difficult for normal people to understand that.
And because that's how he thinks, because the goal is
the destruction of everything, he is violent by necessity, because
there is no nonviolent way to destroy things. It doesn't
(04:25):
matter what it is. This piece of paper right here.
If I want to destroy this piece of paper, how
would I do it. Maybe I would have to light
it on fire. Maybe I could tear it up into
little bitty bits. But there's no non violent way to
do it. I can't sit and pray for it. I
can't wish it to go away. I can if I
want to destroy this piece of paper, I must commit
(04:48):
acts of violence to destroy the piece of paper. And
that's why the American Democrat speaks about violence and talks
about violence and thinks about violence in a way that
is just Oh, that's how it has to be.
Speaker 3 (05:02):
I asked you the question about.
Speaker 1 (05:03):
Captain America because this is my point. Most people, and
I've done this ten times in the last day as
an experiment, and ten out of ten said no. Most
people say no, Captain America isn't violent. But why do
you consider him non violent? I've personally watched in the
movies and read in comic books. I've watched this guy
beat up and killed God knows how many people, Aliens, enemies, Nazis, whatever,
(05:25):
by any measure, if you actually thought about it, you
would say that's a violent man. But you don't consider
him violent because he's committing acts of violence for the
good guys and against the bad guys. That's why you
consider him non violent. That's why the left loves this
Luigi guy. Remember remember United Healthcare Insurance Company. They're CEO,
(05:53):
A father of two, a father of two little children.
He was murdered by this vicious communist named Luigi. And
something has happened since then, Luigi's gotten popular, quite famous.
Women send him love letters. The Left can't really bring
(06:18):
themselves to outright condemn what he did, and even if
they do, it's something along the line. So well, I mean, yeah,
it's not good to kill somebody. But but you know,
I thought this little interview with Taylor Lorenz on CNN
was pretty revealing.
Speaker 4 (06:35):
So you're gonna see women especially that feel like, oh
my god, right, Like, here's this man who who's revolutionary,
who's famous, who's handsome, who's young, who's smart, He's a
person that seems as like this morally good man, which
is hard to find. They want somebody to take on
the system, they want somebody to tear down these barbaric
(07:00):
as establishment institutions.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
Hey seems like a good dude. And I don't condone
what he did, but it seems like a good dude.
And I mean someone had to step in, after all.
It's the forces of evil. Captain America is in violence.
It's fighting for the good guys. He's got to beat
up some Nazis when you're fighting good guys. And this
isn't unique to Taylor Lorenz or CNN. We'll get back
(07:26):
to them in a moment. This is how American communists,
American democrats, this is how the majority of them think.
Even the average normal, run of the mill Democrat, that
Democrat in your family, in your workplace, at some level,
believes in violence. Look back, see what they were saying
(07:48):
about masking vaccinations. I remember, like it was yesterday. Pole
lefter Pole came out showing Democrats half the majority of
them wanted you thrown in quarantine camp. They wanted government
agents showing up at your home, throwing you in the
back of a paddy wagon and hauling you off to
(08:09):
a concentration camp if you didn't do what you're told.
And of course they would have been standing behind the
truck waving at you feeling one hundred percent certain that
they're the good guys as you went off the camp.
Communists are all violent. It is a violent, demonic religion
(08:30):
of destruction and domination. And I wanted to have this
talk with you because there is something happening right now.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
It's very very, very obvious.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
I don't know if you saw that story in wisconsinant
tineenager murder, murderer's parents. I'm sure you saw the vandalism
of Governor Shapiro in Pennsylvania's home. We'll get to that
in a moment as well. Obviously you know about the
Luigi story. You know about the two assassination attempts of
Donald Trump. You know it. But so I'm here to
tell you this. This is really the point of all
(09:01):
this Communist violence is now increasing and it will continue
to increase in the coming days and months. They feel
as if they don't have the presidency. They feel as
if Trump is attacking their base, their financial base, their
(09:22):
base of support, and his efforts to clean out the government.
They feel uniquely attacked. Therefore, they feel uniquely warranted in
committing acts of violence against you and people on the right,
and as the violence of communism increases, you will see
our very evil media, our evil system. You will see something.
(09:45):
In fact, it's already happening. They're laying it out in
front of you. As communist violence rises, it gets worse
and worse and worse, and people die and they're hurt,
and they're vandalized, and the die and they're hurting, they're vandalized.
As violent communism rises, the media knows it can't cover
it up. The American media doesn't have that kind of
control anymore to completely ignore it or completely cover it up.
(10:07):
You can see it. You have eyes, you have your ears.
Everyone can see the tesla's burning, the swastika is being
carved into things. Everyone knows what's happening. So what can
the media do If they can't keep it from your eyes,
if they can't hide it from you, what do you do?
What's quite simple, really, there's only one thing you can do.
Act like it's everybody you see, it's everybody. Don't you
(10:28):
do this? Haven't you ever done this with your wife
or your husband, or your girlfriend boyfriend, Or you're having
a fight, maybe you have a big old, knockdown, drag
out fight, and maybe it's maybe it's your fault, and
at some point, maybe right away, maybe you realize it's
your fault. What's the end goal of that fight if
it's your fault yet you're in fight mode.
Speaker 3 (10:50):
Oh hey, we.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
Both said some things. We were granted, all right, we
both did some things wrong. If it's all your fault,
what you do is you grab the innocent party and
you lump them in with you. We all made mistakes here.
Here's CNN.
Speaker 5 (11:07):
What we're looking at here is obviously, you know, when
it comes to extremism in this country, I mean, the
issue very much so is on the right, on the
far right, from you know, from Charlottesville to January sixth,
there isn't exactly an equivalent on the left in this moment.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
Hey, that's the right.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
I mean, look some things on the left. But January sixth,
the corpse, and look, Governor Shapiro had his home torched
by an arsonist. We all know what was going on.
We all know exactly what was going on, and he
knows too. There's no dummy. But he is a Democrat.
(11:50):
He has to play the middle of the road role
in Pennsylvania. But is a Democrat, and so he couldn't
get up and say Hey, I know it was you leftists,
I know, would you? I know it was one of
you Hamas lovers. I know he couldn't get up and
say that.
Speaker 6 (12:05):
He had to do that.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
It's kind of all of us thing.
Speaker 7 (12:09):
This type of violence is not okay. This kind of
violence is becoming far too common in our society. And
I don't give a damn if it's coming from one
particular side or the other, directed it one particular party
(12:31):
or another, or one particular person or another. It is
not okay.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
And it has to stop. What a benign, completely useless statement.
And that's what it's designed to be. You see, it's
not okay, and it's it's everybody. Both sides are doing it.
It's every It's definitely just not one side. It's both
(12:59):
sides that it's not okay. He knows exactly where it's
coming from, he knows exactly why. But he also knows this.
And this is the hard part. This is hard for you,
it's hard for me, it's hard for the country. You
can't get violence out of the communists. It's their religion.
(13:20):
You can't get it out of them, can't. It doesn't
matter what you do. You can give them all the
power in the world. They'll just create concentration camps and
slaughter millions of you. If you take away all their power,
they'll just find little street mobs to murder this person
and burn this thing down. You can't get it out
of them. Communism is what violence is, not what communisms
communists do, It's who they are. It is woven into
(13:44):
their religion. Because again, I can't destroy this piece of
paper in a non violent way. When your religion tells
you to destroy everything, you will inherently be violent. Post
his address, someone posts this guy's address. How many times
have you seen some Democrat, maybe someone you know, say
(14:07):
that online violence I can't help themselves. All that may
have made you uncomfortable that I am right. I slept
so good. I don't mean to brag. Look, okay, I
do mean to brag. But I sleep good all the
time now, unless, of course, I forget to have my being.
(14:28):
You see, I have dream powder from being. I know
that there are endless things that are sold as helping
you sleep and full disclosure. They will all kinds of things.
Doctor will write you a prescription for something. You can
go into the gas station anymore and buy something that
will put you to sleep, they'll question. But all those
things have the same thing. Income you sleep, but you
(14:50):
wake up and want to die because you're so tired
and groggy. Dream Powder is different because it's natural, racy
and melatonin and all kinds of things. It's a cup
of hot chok that with natural things in it, you
will just sleep like a baby, and when you wake
up you will feel so good. Sound good shotbeam dot
(15:11):
com slash Jesse Kelly saves you will fortune. Well, I
have outstanding news. I mean it's not breaking news. We've
(15:32):
already talked about it on the show. But what have
we said over and over and over again that it's
Red states that constantly fail the United States of America.
And part of our failure is the loser senators we
send to Washington DC. Red states states like my own,
like Texas, but Texas isn't alone, the Carolinas, the Dakota
is like a good analyst. Red states routinely send the
(15:56):
biggest weenie losers to Washington, DC. We can find we
could have anybody we want, and so we need to
change that. Neil Way to change that is a primary,
but it's hard to primary. United States Senator it's very difficult.
Takes money. You have to have the ability to raise money,
you have to be already known. You can't. As much
as I hate this, you can't come out of nowhere
and challenge a United States Senator. You need the right circumstances,
(16:21):
and we have it. Gosh, I'm so happy right now
joining me now the current Attorney General for the state
of Texas, and a good one, and a man who
is doing exactly what we've talked about forever, Attorney General
Ken Paxton, who is challenging John Cornyn in Texas. I'm
so happy you're here. I don't think I've ever said
(16:42):
that to anybody, but I'm just so thrilled you're here.
Speaker 8 (16:45):
Well, thank you, it's great to be here. It's going
to be an interesting year.
Speaker 3 (16:48):
Yeah, why do this?
Speaker 8 (16:52):
You know it's interesting.
Speaker 9 (16:53):
I'm getting all this pushback from the Washington establishment about
why I shouldn't do it, because there's really no difference.
Coryn is just as good as anybody else.
Speaker 8 (17:01):
And my answer is no, he's not. If you look
at his twenty three years in the Senate, look at.
Speaker 9 (17:07):
His forty years in office, there's nothing that you look
at and you say, hey, this guy really represents Texans,
especially Texans Texas primary voters, the way we want to
be represented. And so after twenty three years, I can
say it's been a failure. I can't point to things
that he's done that I'm proud of. I can talk
about things that he has done that I wished he
(17:28):
hadn't done.
Speaker 8 (17:29):
And so there's no reason.
Speaker 9 (17:30):
Maybe if he's from Maine, we're okay with this, but
if we're from Texas, we need somebody more like Ted Kruz,
not somebody like John Cornyn who just goes along to
get along and answer and answers to Washington and not
the Texas voters.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
You're one hundred percent right about that. It's something that
I've implored my fellow Texans and we're all Red Staters
about that we owe the country better than what we
give them, Like you pointed out Maine, Alaska. Okay, that's
going to be what it's going to be. Texas should
be sending the most blood, the blood red conservative you
(18:04):
could possibly find. And John Cornin's there leading the charge
on gun control.
Speaker 9 (18:10):
Well exactly, And I can tell you this, I mean,
no Democratic president, including Joe Biden's going to be congratulating me.
Speaker 8 (18:16):
On work that I've done for you know, the country.
Speaker 9 (18:18):
And that's exactly what happened with John Coryn when he
pushed through his gun legislation that restricted ownership and restricted
gun rights. This is a guy that was congratulated by
Joe Biden. That tells you exactly what you need to know.
That's never gonna happen with me.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
What happens to these people when they go to d C.
Because obviously, you know, when you're a senator from a
state like Texas, will just make it about Texas. You
understand who the people of Texas are and what they want.
Why do you lose your mind in Washington DC? Is
it the power, is it the money?
Speaker 3 (18:50):
What is it?
Speaker 9 (18:52):
I think it does happen that people change, But I
don't think that's John Cornyn's story. I think when he
got elected during the Bush reign, he is exactly what
went We were just trying to elect Republicans. We hadn't
had very many Republicans in Texas. We elected John Corny.
He was a Bush guy and he was there to
do what the Bushes wanted to do. He still is
and the reality is now we are a solid Republican state,
(19:13):
and we don't have to accept we're just going to
have a guy that go up there and has the
R by his name. He's going to vote, you know,
somewhat Republican, but he's not going to get the job done.
And he's going to do things like oppose the border wall.
He is going to oppose Donald Trump both personally as
an elected official, but also on many of his issues.
Speaker 8 (19:30):
And he is going to.
Speaker 9 (19:31):
Pass restrictive gun legislation and that's not what we need
from Texas.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
How's the GOP response been, both inside the state and nationally.
I say this as someone who has challenged an establishment
guy for Congress and felt what that's like with all
the big money people, all the big shots telling you
you have to wait your turn, you can't do this. Oh,
I remember all the lines. I'm sure you've gotten all
of them.
Speaker 9 (19:57):
I've gotten them all, and mostly from outside of Texas,
mostly from you know, Senate leadership and the other you
know establishment people. Some within Texas that were definitely part
of that establishment group, But the majority of Texas that
I've talked to are very excited.
Speaker 8 (20:12):
I mean, I didn't just like come up with this
idea I've been.
Speaker 9 (20:15):
Out testing, I've been out talking, I've been out meeting
with hundreds of Republicans, and every time I brought it up,
it was an overwhelmingly positive response.
Speaker 8 (20:23):
We are desperate for a change.
Speaker 9 (20:26):
We are desperate after twenty four years of John Corny,
to have a choice.
Speaker 8 (20:30):
And so this that's what this is. This is a choice.
Speaker 9 (20:32):
And I can guarantee this. John Corner is not going
to run on his record. He's not going to because
he can't. He's not going to run on my record.
This is all going to be personal attacks, and that's
what he's all about. He cannot stand on his own
two feet. And the only thing he can say is,
you know, now, I'm supporting Trump after criticizing him for
the last you know, eight years, now, Johnny cum lately,
John Cornyn is in the in the in the fold
(20:55):
for the president for the first time ever.
Speaker 8 (20:57):
And that's gonna last. How long it's gonna last till
we're done with the elections.
Speaker 1 (21:01):
Of course. Oh well, he was asked about you. Here's
what he said. I'm sure you've seen it.
Speaker 8 (21:05):
Do you have any veal concern about Paxton running to
the right of.
Speaker 10 (21:08):
You in his primary?
Speaker 11 (21:11):
Well, The biggest potential loser is President Trump's agenda. I've
been a supporter of the president during his first term
of office and that's continued during his current term. Mister
Paxton has a checker background. He is a con man
and a fraud and I think the people of Texas
(21:32):
know that.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
It's also predictable and tired. You already pointed out what
it's going to be. It's going to be a never
ending commercial spree of Trump, Trump, Trump, I love Trump.
I love Trump, even though he's done everything in his
power to undermine everything to make America great again. Agenda
is it's going to be Donald Trump's name as he
desperately sucks up trying to earn that endorsement.
Speaker 8 (21:54):
Well, he just talked about fraud and a con man.
Speaker 9 (21:57):
That's exactly what we just saw there talking about I've
been viper Donald Trump from the beginning. That is a
con job and that is a fraudulent statement. That is
not true. He said in twenty sixteen when Trump was
earn nomin he was an albatross around our neck, and
this time he insinuated that he was at criminal. Of course,
John was a judge and he should know better than
to insinuate that people are criminals without proof, which is
(22:20):
what he did in my case and in the president's case.
And then of course he said that he would not
be supporting Donald Trump and that we should have a
better new nominee. So just looking at what he said
in that clip, that's what you call a fraudulent statement.
That's what you call a con man. And that's supposedly
what I am. And there he is lying to the
public and lying to Texans.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
All right, where do we go from here? Give the
people watching details because this is a national race that
has national implications. Taking out one of these losers is
really important for the whole country. So the people watching,
what can they do? Can they do anything? When is
all this?
Speaker 9 (22:57):
Oh, look, this is going to be a battle of
Texas versus Washington establishment. And the money is going to
come from all over the country. For John Cornyn to
let plenty of money from outside sources. He will raise
some money in Texas, but my money is going to
have to come from the grassroots all over the country.
And I am convinced that we can raise enough. We
(23:17):
don't have to outraise them. We just have to be
in the game of something Two to one three to
run within that range, we can beat John Cornyn and
we can.
Speaker 8 (23:26):
We can win this election.
Speaker 9 (23:29):
Where do people go, Kenpaxson dot com and you can
go donate right there and start the start the momentum.
Small contributions are or we want them because it shows support,
It shows the difference between me and him, because he
will not be getting those small contributions, not in any
large volume.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
Kenpaxton dot com. If you got five bucks, give it,
you got five hundred, give it. This is critically important.
I'm asking you to do it. How many times do
I do that and never do that? I'm doing it
right now, mister Attorney General. Thank you, I appreciate. I'm
very much behind you. Go get them. We needed to win.
We cannot survive as a country if we continue to
(24:09):
lose our testosterone. And I know this is an uncomfortable
conversation I do, but you should understand that we've lost
fifty percent of our testosterone levels in the last fifty years. Now,
that's not your fault, that's something else going on. Look,
there's estrogen in the water, a lot of it now,
(24:29):
estrogen that was never there before. It's evaporating our t levels.
So how do we fix that? How do we fight back?
We can't continue like this. That's what a male vitality
stack from Chalk can do for you. Natural herbal supplements
of the highest quality. Go get a subscription two three months.
You're gonna feel like a brand new person. Believe me,
(24:53):
it's it's life changing. Go to Chalk dot com slash
jessetv subscriptions. You save a pile of money. Go. You
will feel better shortly.
Speaker 12 (25:13):
My mission is clear. I'm focused, I'm prepared, I'm ready.
I've been trained by the best. I went to Howard
University that overturned legal segregation in this country. I've been
taught in those classrooms with our good Marshall once taught
(25:34):
I'm not afraid of no President Donald Trump. We're ready
for you. We're coming for you. We're standing up for you.
We're fighting on. We're not going down. Sailing victory, my friends,
is clear. It's now and I'm not waiting four years.
I'm waiting two. I tell us speaker by the name
(25:54):
of H. King Jeffries, comes to bring us some rest.
Come on, ladies, it's to us we say this democracy before,
we'll say that. Now, let's go.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
I don't know if that was hard for you, but
it's hard for me if she was in my ear
almost had to take this out. It's just so obnoxious.
It shoting me now. But buddy, Mike Cernovich, filmmaker, author,
actually has another one coming, which I'm gonna ask him
about here in just a moment. Mike, on top of
the fact she's obnoxious, what do you make of all this?
She going down for mortgage fraud or something. What's happening
(26:32):
with all this?
Speaker 13 (26:33):
Yeah, everyone knows if your conservative, filing for a mortgage
application is very stressful because mortgage brokers would just throw
in any kind of number and you have to say, no,
you can't do this.
Speaker 6 (26:45):
You don't.
Speaker 13 (26:46):
Don't get me involved in some kind of nonsense because
your scummy agency. And with Letitia James, it was she,
not the mortgage broker who falsified data allegedly, although it
looks quite strong to me in a mortgage application, there
were multiple issues that could not be attributed to errors
or that she couldn't blame the mortgage broker for and
(27:09):
now she is facing investigation for that as she should.
Speaker 1 (27:14):
Okay, Mike, you're a lot more well versed in the
law and most things than I am, what are we
looking on here? Is she going to prison? Is she
going to get a little five hundred dollars? Fine? What
kind of charges are we looking at here for this stuff?
Speaker 13 (27:28):
Well they can if you look at how they charge cases,
these can be charged aggressively because they can be charged
not just this mortgage fraud, but all some money laundering.
And if you look at how they charge the Trump cases,
you can make it a very simple case that would
plead down to a misdemeanor, or they could make it
multiple felonies. Because the Nash case I think was illustrative.
(27:48):
D Nash was indicted for allegedly using straw donors to
help a friend's campaign, and he said, I'm going to
go to trial. So then what happened was the SDNY
under that really scuzzy guy, I forget his name, but
he really is a real scummy lowlife guy, and then
he refiled the case to say, well, because you use
(28:09):
straw donors, you knowingly got someone to file a federal
tax return that was false and that's a mandatory minimum
of five years. And that's why Denesh ended up pleading guilty.
So there are a lot of different ways that cases
like these can be charged. Ordinarily, it would be a
felony that you would plead down to a misdemeanor, and
she would have to be disbarred because it would be
(28:31):
considered a crime of moral turpitude since it was a
financial fraud.
Speaker 6 (28:35):
So, if I'm boring, you just interrupt me.
Speaker 13 (28:37):
But if you're a lawyer, you're not just subject to
the criminal laws of the land, of course, but you're
subject to state our jurisdiction. So if you file a
false mortgage application that isn't your mortgage broker doing funny
business after you've filled it out honestly, then you would
be guilty of a crime of moral turpitude because that
(28:57):
would be financial fraud, and then of course you would
be disbarred. Although as we've seen, the states like California
and New York and DC have a different set of
standards for Democrat lawyers and for Republicans.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
Yeah, what a shock, all right, Look, Hey, I'm thrilled
that at least one scumbag might be facing some form
of justice. Right, I'll take anything I can get at
this point in time. What do you make right now
of the job, Pam BONDI we're going to focus on
her specifically of the job she's doing. I'm not a lawyer.
(29:29):
I'm doing the best I can to be patient, and
I'm telling myself every night, Mike, when I go to bed,
that she's just busy crossing the t's and dot in
the eyes, and government indictments are coming down soon. This
government person's going to be arrested, and this government person's
going to be arrested. That's what I tell myself so
I can sleep at night. Mike, what do you think.
Speaker 13 (29:49):
Well, I don't want to play the whole as a
lawyer card, because I never like to do that because
I'm not Douglas Murray. But I'll say that as a lawyer.
So it took you a second, you got one. So
as a lawyer with a fair amount of expertise on
these issues, the issue that you have is, and Trump
really had this problem in his first term, is all
(30:11):
of the Department of Justice lawyers were pro Biden regime.
So Biden comes in, he has this fascist attorney general
and he's got all the line lawyers ready to file paperwork. Well,
instead of those line lawyers properly enforcing the law under
BONDI they're sabotaging, they're slow walking, A bunch of them
are resigning. They're all running through New York Times and
(30:32):
throwing tantrums. So they just don't have the manpower that
you would thank. Ed Martin, for example, is his nomination
to a US attorney for the District of Columbia is
being held up by Adam Schiff, a Russiagate collusion hoaxer.
So if you're on the outside, you would say, my goodness,
why is it that there were almost one hundred Jay
(30:55):
six ers already indicted at this time during Biden's administration.
We can barely get someone on a very clean case
of mortgage fraud. And the answer is because every attorney
hiring process, starting under Barack Obama, the FBI, and the
DOJ was to get people into the Stossi So they
(31:16):
were all on board. They're ready to go, they're ready
to frame people for crimes, and the Body administration is
having trouble at getting lawyers even confirmed to positions where
they're needed. So this is I'm not a plan truster, everybody.
I always tell people go read what I had to
say about Trump during his first term, because people even
try to dig up tweets to get one over on me,
and I was like, oh no, I was very frustrated.
(31:37):
I'm not a plan truster, but in this case, you
really have. You have Mangino, you have cash, and then
you have everybody in there who's the stassi And if
you look at Christopher Ray bragged about it. I believe
forty of current FBI employees were hired during the Biden regime.
Speaker 6 (31:55):
Right, It's going to take.
Speaker 13 (31:56):
A long time to unravel this and find out who's
good and who isn't. So I think people should continue
being aggressive in a civil way about these issues. But
I don't think it's fair to compare the timeline of
the Trump second term with the Biden regimes first term.
Speaker 1 (32:16):
Okay, that's fair. Is it reasonable to assume we will
get these things at some point in the next four
years or is it too far gone? Mike? And I'm
almost scared to ask the question because I'm afraid I
think I already know what the answer is. Are there
too many cancers in place to be removed?
Speaker 6 (32:38):
Yeah?
Speaker 13 (32:39):
The difficult question, and I think about this a lot too,
is we're certainly not going to get what we want,
but we're already getting things. Brian Aughten, who was a
would terrorize you know, innocent Christian people. Chuck Grassley revealed
him as one of the guys responsible for the Hunter
Biden laptop cover up scheme.
Speaker 6 (32:58):
He's been removed.
Speaker 13 (32:59):
So things are happening, but it unfortunate that we're fighting
personnel decisions that we're a decade in the making. They
are all these FBI agents and DOJ officials. Some of
them have civil service protections, so you can't just come
in and remove them. Judges are jamming everything up. What
we have to do is take the wines that we can,
(33:19):
and we have to keep pushing. I do like the
idea of impeaching judges, not because I think the Senate
will convict them, because they absolutely will not, but because
it'll give Congress jurisdiction to issue subpoenas. So if I'm
you and I'm talking to Chip Roy and I'm talking
to I'm not just saying like in the hypothetical world,
if I'm talking to these guys, I would say, look,
(33:40):
we know the Senate's not going to convict Bosberg. We
know this, but the only way that we can get
jurisdiction and start issuing subpoenas to find out what is
happening in that DC Stase show trial. Stalin fiefdom is
to is to investigate impeachment, because then we have congressional oversight,
we have congressional subpoena power. Then we can issue subpoenas
(34:01):
to Judge Bozberg and say, how is it that these
cases are randomly assigned but you always seem to get them.
Do you have the luckiest hand in the world.
Speaker 6 (34:10):
Should you start playing the lottery?
Speaker 13 (34:11):
Should you go to Vegas because you'd be a billionaire,
become a stocktriator. How is it that you're getting all
these randomly assigned things. As of right now, no one
has jurisdiction to demand answers. A congress member Jim Jim,
Jordan chip Roy or somebody can't just write a letter
and get that information. But if there's an impeachment inquiry
and there's a committee, that committee absolutely has jurisdiction and
(34:33):
they can start issuing subpoenas, and I can tell you
that will put the fear of God into John Roberts
and these DC judges. They will know that they have
to respond to these subpoenas or else the judges can
be held in contempt by Congress and then they can
be indicted the way Steve Bannon was indicted for contempt
of Congress.
Speaker 6 (34:49):
So we one hundred percent what we need to do.
Speaker 13 (34:51):
The best thing we can do right now is say, look,
we know, we know Mitch isn't going to convict any
of these judges.
Speaker 6 (34:57):
Irrelevant, irrelevant.
Speaker 13 (34:59):
This is about I was having jurisdiction and oversight and
the power to start issuing subpoenas to get these judges
under oath and to get this under control.
Speaker 1 (35:09):
Who's Gunzalo Lira?
Speaker 6 (35:12):
Great question.
Speaker 13 (35:13):
Apparently nobody knows because there was a guy who writes
for the Atlantic and he's always talking about how great
Ukraine democracy is, and I go, what about gonzal Era?
And then he's sanctimoniously says, well, how do you expect
me to know about everybody? And then he said, I
bet you that people at the Orange County shopping malls
that you go to don't know who he is. Like, yeah, dumb, dumb,
(35:34):
you're proven my point. You guys had a media blackout
on Gonzala Lira. And I consider Gonzala Lira the litmus
test for whether I consider someone to be a propagandist
or a person who has a good faith debate with
me about.
Speaker 6 (35:50):
Ukraine, a good faith disagreement, you could.
Speaker 13 (35:53):
Say, as you you know you, and I could just say, hey,
what was what was he doing going to Ukraine making
videos callings the lins dictator? Right, he's lucky he didn't
get beat up. But then they killed them. They took
him prisoner when he was trying to leave the country.
This is all on video. And the Zelenski regime and
the Ukrainians were so psychotic that instead of saying, thank goodness,
(36:15):
we got rid of this wacko, get him out of
the country. What a problem, right, they instead decided to
kidnap him, torture him, and kill him. And then, of
course when asked, they'll say he had a medical condition.
When that he would say, well, why didn't you get
a medical treatment in the US. So Gonzalaalira is an
American who made YouTube videos that the Zelinsky regime didn't like.
(36:35):
He was held in custody. He tried to leave the
country when he was more or less told to by
Ukrainian law enforcement, who said it would be a good
idea if you kind of just disappeared.
Speaker 6 (36:46):
He tried to leave.
Speaker 13 (36:47):
He documented it all and then he died in a hospital,
a victim of torture of the Zelensky regime. The Great
Democracy and our great Western ally.
Speaker 1 (36:57):
Are good friends. Are good friends, Mike, what's this movie?
Are you allowed to talk about it yet? Or am
I not supposed to ask? I didn't text you before.
Speaker 13 (37:05):
I'm working on two. Yeah, I'm working on two. One
is still under wraps. But the big one we're doing
is about the meaning of life. And it's called meaning
one word, and it's about the meaning of life. We
just spent two months in the Amazon looking at what
might have been megalists with Timothy Alberino, tracing the you know,
the origin of humanity. We looked at some people doing ayahuasca.
(37:28):
Talk to ayahuasca people. We're going to churches, We're going
to We're talking to people of all different kinds of life.
And trying to make a movie, which is an ambitious project, is.
Speaker 6 (37:42):
One way to put it.
Speaker 13 (37:43):
Causes me a lot of stress would be another way
to put it, like, Oh, I'm going to make a
movie about the meaning of life. What a DOUCHEARONI right,
my god, you know what a what a douche? Well,
that's what we're trying to do.
Speaker 1 (37:54):
Though, Gosh, I want to go to the Amazon Mike.
I'll talk to you so brother, appreciate you. I hate
that corporate America left us and I hate that. I
know I sound like an old man when I talk
about that, but let me just say, for you younger
people watching, it was not like this when when I
(38:15):
was a kid, and I'm not ancient and I'm forty
three years old, you could turn on television. You wouldn't
get any politics in the corporate ads. It was shoes
and gatorades and whatever catchy jingles there used to be
jingles on TV. Now corporations use your money against you.
It's frustrating, but we have to fight back. We can't
(38:36):
just shrug our shoulders and say, well, times have changed.
We have to fight back. Who's your cell phone provider? Verizon,
ATNT and T Mobile hatred guts. Switch to the cell
phone company that's on the same five G network and
doesn't hate your guts. You'll save a fortune. You don't
have to have a new phone or a new phone number.
You save money. You switch. You patronize a company that
(38:57):
actually loves you. Pure Talk pure talk dot Com slash JESSETV.
All Right, let's talk about well, it's gonna be about
the military, but it's about the communist purge here for
(39:17):
a couple moments. Remember this, Remember, as we just talked
about in the opening, these people are out to destroy
and they will destroy everything if they can, and they
will most definitely destroy wherever they are. That's just how
it works. If you bring a communist into your church,
your church will be destroyed by it. If you're big
(39:38):
in into your business, your business will be destroyed by
it because they will eat everything in front of them.
They're like animals. Really, that's really how you can really
think about communists. And now let's talk about our military.
You see, because don't think for one second they drop
the communist uniform when they put on the uniform of
the United States of America. Not at all. They view
(39:59):
their everywhere wherever they are. They view their role as
fighting for the revolution. And don't think that that changed
when Donald Trump took over. And my point for this
little talk we're about to have is that Pete hag Seth,
who's doing a very good job, he will need all
four years and he will need to be vicious. Remember
when Jdvans traveled to Greenland and said this.
Speaker 14 (40:21):
What we think is going to happen is that the
Greenlanders are going to choose through self determination to become
independent of Denmark, and then we're going to have conversations
with the people of Greenland from there. So I think
that talking about anything too far in the future is
way too premature. We do not think that military force
is ever going to be necessary. We think this makes sense,
(40:44):
and because we think the people of Greenland are rational
and good, we think we're going to be able to
cut a deal Donald Trump's style to ensure the security
of this territory but also the United States of America.
Speaker 1 (40:56):
Okay, you might disagree with that, but it's certainly nothing
radical or insane. Yeah. The spaceport's commander on the ground,
Susanna Meyers. This is the email she sent out. Now,
remember these people are all above her in the chain
of command. Do you think Susanna Myers set aside her
(41:16):
communism because she put on the uniform and achieved the
rank of colonel.
Speaker 3 (41:20):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (41:21):
I do not presume to understand the current politics, but
what I do know is the concerns of the US
and administration discussed by Vice President Vance on Friday, are
not reflective of space space. She just flat out and
came out and said, I don't care what JD. Vance said.
That's not my agenda, that's not what we believe here.
They can't help themselves. Susannah Chatfield vice admiral. That's a
(41:46):
big boy position in the United States Navy. She had
to be purged last week. She used to give speeches
like this.
Speaker 15 (41:53):
And we've also heard about the meaningful participation of women
in the security and defense sectors. We have learned about
the importance of gender inclusive approaches. We will be left
with a professional military ready to get after the needs
of the nation, with highly talented, diverse and capable people
(42:16):
before us, beside us, and behind us. And I would
say that this is exactly what the women piece and
Security agenda seeks to achieve.
Speaker 1 (42:31):
My point in this is not that we got a
couple out. My point is American communists have been embedding
these little tumors inside of our government at every level,
including the military, for years. Barack Obama is really the
one who turned this into overdrives. So when you think
about that, Barack obamasand and eight the twenty sixteen, then
(42:57):
we get a little brief four year reprieve didn't remove
them the first time. Then Joe Biden came in did
this again an overdrive. We now have twelve years of
focused communist effort putting these little cancers in every single
nook and cranny. We have so much work to do. Remember,
(43:18):
Linda Fagon.
Speaker 10 (43:20):
We currently have nearly forty percent women enrolled at the
Coastguard Academy. I'm really excited about the talent and the
diversity that I see coming through the academy. My daughter
is in the Coastguard as a lieutenant, and there is
just nothing but opportunity for her and all of the
men and women that have joined the service. I'm really
excited about the future as we look ahead.
Speaker 1 (43:45):
There's a lot of fagans we have to get rid of.
Let's help. We're up to the task, all.
Speaker 3 (43:51):
Right, all right, it's time.
Speaker 1 (44:07):
To lighten the mood. And I'm an Ohio State fan.
I was born in Ohio, lived there until I was ten.
You really didn't have any choice. Ohio State Buckeyes won
the national titles, showed up the White House. That's a
good thing. What was less good was jd Vance vice
President of the United States of America. He broke the
national Championship trophy. J D was a good sport about
(44:47):
it in the end, though, all right, I'll see them,
am
Okay, let's have a talk about communist violence, why, how
the media presents it, how the media encourages it, and
things like that. But I'm gonna do a little experiment
with you first, all right, just a little experiment. It
involves no thought whatsoever, so don't worry about it. We're
just gonna do a first answer that pops into your head,
(00:32):
yes or no. Okay, it's a yes or no thing,
first answer that pops into your head. Let me ask
you something. Do you consider Captain America, the fictional character?
Do you consider him to be a violent man? I
asked that because most people their first answer to that
(00:53):
question is no. I mean, obviously he's running and jumping,
inviting and doing these things, but most people say no.
I'll tell you what. We'll come back to that, all right.
There's an interview that's been making the rounds. It's about
five years old, but it's a very very revealing interview.
AOC that loves your congresswoman from the Bronx is sitting
(01:14):
down with Megan Rappino, that the crazy feminist lesbian soccer player.
They're all sitting around having a lovely little chat about
how America is burning and crumbling. And there's a moment
in this I thought I would bring up for a
purpose of our conversation here, it was perhaps.
Speaker 2 (01:31):
We are in the downfall of the broken way. This
was not built to last. Inequity injustice is not built
to last. It lasts a long time, it could last
hundreds of years, but ultimately it crumbles into this, you know,
a small cohort of incompetent people that create damage, and
(01:58):
from that something new can spring. And so maybe something
is declining right now, but maybe it deserves to decline.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
Pretty revealing little moment. Maybe I haven't seen that clip before,
but I want to just point out again, like I
mentioned before, you see that when AOC described everything crumbling down,
everything you love, everything around you, she got that look. Well,
you're looking at it right now on the screen, that look,
that look that everyone knows. What is that look? That
(02:30):
is a look of satisfaction, A job well done. I
made the comparison when I pull a brisket off of
the smoker, if I've done it perfectly and I know it,
that is the exact look I get on my face.
I did it, job well done. Communists are violent by
(02:52):
their very nature because their religion is a religion of destruction. Always.
There's no end to the destruction either. Communists will try
to sell you on their communism by always promising that
they will build something new and lovely on the back end,
of course, and in a while we're gonna build something new.
(03:14):
Of course, that that never ever comes though. It's just
destroy everything all the time. And this could be so
hard for decent, good people to understand because they can't
they can't relate in any way to that way of thinking.
Who wants to burn down everything? I'll have people ask
me questions about the various things, former things that were
(03:37):
good that the communists have taken over, like the boy Scouts,
you know, the Boy Scouts, and now it's for women
and people, Jesse. Why would they come for the boy Scouts?
They come for everything everything. The communist looks around and
he sees things to destroy that you don't even notice,
things that you don't even notice. He looks and he sees, oh,
(04:02):
I bet I could burn that down. That's how he thinks.
It's very very difficult for normal people to understand that.
And because that's how he thinks, because the goal is
the destruction of everything, he is violent by necessity, because
there is no nonviolent way to destroy things. It doesn't
(04:25):
matter what it is. This piece of paper right here.
If I want to destroy this piece of paper, how
would I do it. Maybe I would have to light
it on fire. Maybe I could tear it up into
little bitty bits. But there's no non violent way to
do it. I can't sit and pray for it. I
can't wish it to go away. I can if I
want to destroy this piece of paper, I must commit
(04:48):
acts of violence to destroy the piece of paper. And
that's why the American Democrat speaks about violence and talks
about violence and thinks about violence in a way that
is just Oh, that's how it has to be.
Speaker 3 (05:02):
I asked you the question about.
Speaker 1 (05:03):
Captain America because this is my point. Most people, and
I've done this ten times in the last day as
an experiment, and ten out of ten said no. Most
people say no, Captain America isn't violent. But why do
you consider him non violent? I've personally watched in the
movies and read in comic books. I've watched this guy
beat up and killed God knows how many people, Aliens, enemies, Nazis, whatever,
(05:25):
by any measure, if you actually thought about it, you
would say that's a violent man. But you don't consider
him violent because he's committing acts of violence for the
good guys and against the bad guys. That's why you
consider him non violent. That's why the left loves this
Luigi guy. Remember remember United Healthcare Insurance Company. They're CEO,
(05:53):
A father of two, a father of two little children.
He was murdered by this vicious communist named Luigi. And
something has happened since then, Luigi's gotten popular, quite famous.
Women send him love letters. The Left can't really bring
(06:18):
themselves to outright condemn what he did, and even if
they do, it's something along the line. So well, I mean, yeah,
it's not good to kill somebody. But but you know,
I thought this little interview with Taylor Lorenz on CNN
was pretty revealing.
Speaker 4 (06:35):
So you're gonna see women especially that feel like, oh
my god, right, Like, here's this man who who's revolutionary,
who's famous, who's handsome, who's young, who's smart, He's a
person that seems as like this morally good man, which
is hard to find. They want somebody to take on
the system, they want somebody to tear down these barbaric
(07:00):
as establishment institutions.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
Hey seems like a good dude. And I don't condone
what he did, but it seems like a good dude.
And I mean someone had to step in, after all.
It's the forces of evil. Captain America is in violence.
It's fighting for the good guys. He's got to beat
up some Nazis when you're fighting good guys. And this
isn't unique to Taylor Lorenz or CNN. We'll get back
(07:26):
to them in a moment. This is how American communists,
American democrats, this is how the majority of them think.
Even the average normal, run of the mill Democrat, that
Democrat in your family, in your workplace, at some level,
believes in violence. Look back, see what they were saying
(07:48):
about masking vaccinations. I remember, like it was yesterday. Pole
lefter Pole came out showing Democrats half the majority of
them wanted you thrown in quarantine camp. They wanted government
agents showing up at your home, throwing you in the
back of a paddy wagon and hauling you off to
(08:09):
a concentration camp if you didn't do what you're told.
And of course they would have been standing behind the
truck waving at you feeling one hundred percent certain that
they're the good guys as you went off the camp.
Communists are all violent. It is a violent, demonic religion
(08:30):
of destruction and domination. And I wanted to have this
talk with you because there is something happening right now.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
It's very very, very obvious.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
I don't know if you saw that story in wisconsinant
tineenager murder, murderer's parents. I'm sure you saw the vandalism
of Governor Shapiro in Pennsylvania's home. We'll get to that
in a moment as well. Obviously you know about the
Luigi story. You know about the two assassination attempts of
Donald Trump. You know it. But so I'm here to
tell you this. This is really the point of all
(09:01):
this Communist violence is now increasing and it will continue
to increase in the coming days and months. They feel
as if they don't have the presidency. They feel as
if Trump is attacking their base, their financial base, their
(09:22):
base of support, and his efforts to clean out the government.
They feel uniquely attacked. Therefore, they feel uniquely warranted in
committing acts of violence against you and people on the right,
and as the violence of communism increases, you will see
our very evil media, our evil system. You will see something.
(09:45):
In fact, it's already happening. They're laying it out in
front of you. As communist violence rises, it gets worse
and worse and worse, and people die and they're hurt,
and they're vandalized, and the die and they're hurting, they're vandalized.
As violent communism rises, the media knows it can't cover
it up. The American media doesn't have that kind of
control anymore to completely ignore it or completely cover it up.
(10:07):
You can see it. You have eyes, you have your ears.
Everyone can see the tesla's burning, the swastika is being
carved into things. Everyone knows what's happening. So what can
the media do If they can't keep it from your eyes,
if they can't hide it from you, what do you do?
What's quite simple, really, there's only one thing you can do.
Act like it's everybody you see, it's everybody. Don't you
(10:28):
do this? Haven't you ever done this with your wife
or your husband, or your girlfriend boyfriend, Or you're having
a fight, maybe you have a big old, knockdown, drag
out fight, and maybe it's maybe it's your fault, and
at some point, maybe right away, maybe you realize it's
your fault. What's the end goal of that fight if
it's your fault yet you're in fight mode.
Speaker 3 (10:50):
Oh hey, we.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
Both said some things. We were granted, all right, we
both did some things wrong. If it's all your fault,
what you do is you grab the innocent party and
you lump them in with you. We all made mistakes here.
Here's CNN.
Speaker 5 (11:07):
What we're looking at here is obviously, you know, when
it comes to extremism in this country, I mean, the
issue very much so is on the right, on the
far right, from you know, from Charlottesville to January sixth,
there isn't exactly an equivalent on the left in this moment.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
Hey, that's the right.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
I mean, look some things on the left. But January sixth,
the corpse, and look, Governor Shapiro had his home torched
by an arsonist. We all know what was going on.
We all know exactly what was going on, and he
knows too. There's no dummy. But he is a Democrat.
(11:50):
He has to play the middle of the road role
in Pennsylvania. But is a Democrat, and so he couldn't
get up and say Hey, I know it was you leftists,
I know, would you? I know it was one of
you Hamas lovers. I know he couldn't get up and
say that.
Speaker 6 (12:05):
He had to do that.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
It's kind of all of us thing.
Speaker 7 (12:09):
This type of violence is not okay. This kind of
violence is becoming far too common in our society. And
I don't give a damn if it's coming from one
particular side or the other, directed it one particular party
(12:31):
or another, or one particular person or another. It is
not okay.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
And it has to stop. What a benign, completely useless statement.
And that's what it's designed to be. You see, it's
not okay, and it's it's everybody. Both sides are doing it.
It's every It's definitely just not one side. It's both
(12:59):
sides that it's not okay. He knows exactly where it's
coming from, he knows exactly why. But he also knows this.
And this is the hard part. This is hard for you,
it's hard for me, it's hard for the country. You
can't get violence out of the communists. It's their religion.
(13:20):
You can't get it out of them, can't. It doesn't
matter what you do. You can give them all the
power in the world. They'll just create concentration camps and
slaughter millions of you. If you take away all their power,
they'll just find little street mobs to murder this person
and burn this thing down. You can't get it out
of them. Communism is what violence is, not what communisms
communists do, It's who they are. It is woven into
(13:44):
their religion. Because again, I can't destroy this piece of
paper in a non violent way. When your religion tells
you to destroy everything, you will inherently be violent. Post
his address, someone posts this guy's address. How many times
have you seen some Democrat, maybe someone you know, say
(14:07):
that online violence I can't help themselves. All that may
have made you uncomfortable that I am right. I slept
so good. I don't mean to brag. Look, okay, I
do mean to brag. But I sleep good all the
time now, unless, of course, I forget to have my being.
(14:28):
You see, I have dream powder from being. I know
that there are endless things that are sold as helping
you sleep and full disclosure. They will all kinds of things.
Doctor will write you a prescription for something. You can
go into the gas station anymore and buy something that
will put you to sleep, they'll question. But all those
things have the same thing. Income you sleep, but you
(14:50):
wake up and want to die because you're so tired
and groggy. Dream Powder is different because it's natural, racy
and melatonin and all kinds of things. It's a cup
of hot chok that with natural things in it, you
will just sleep like a baby, and when you wake
up you will feel so good. Sound good shotbeam dot
(15:11):
com slash Jesse Kelly saves you will fortune. Well, I
have outstanding news. I mean it's not breaking news. We've
(15:32):
already talked about it on the show. But what have
we said over and over and over again that it's
Red states that constantly fail the United States of America.
And part of our failure is the loser senators we
send to Washington DC. Red states states like my own,
like Texas, but Texas isn't alone, the Carolinas, the Dakota
is like a good analyst. Red states routinely send the
(15:56):
biggest weenie losers to Washington, DC. We can find we
could have anybody we want, and so we need to
change that. Neil Way to change that is a primary,
but it's hard to primary. United States Senator it's very difficult.
Takes money. You have to have the ability to raise money,
you have to be already known. You can't. As much
as I hate this, you can't come out of nowhere
and challenge a United States Senator. You need the right circumstances,
(16:21):
and we have it. Gosh, I'm so happy right now
joining me now the current Attorney General for the state
of Texas, and a good one, and a man who
is doing exactly what we've talked about forever, Attorney General
Ken Paxton, who is challenging John Cornyn in Texas. I'm
so happy you're here. I don't think I've ever said
(16:42):
that to anybody, but I'm just so thrilled you're here.
Speaker 8 (16:45):
Well, thank you, it's great to be here. It's going
to be an interesting year.
Speaker 3 (16:48):
Yeah, why do this?
Speaker 8 (16:52):
You know it's interesting.
Speaker 9 (16:53):
I'm getting all this pushback from the Washington establishment about
why I shouldn't do it, because there's really no difference.
Coryn is just as good as anybody else.
Speaker 8 (17:01):
And my answer is no, he's not. If you look
at his twenty three years in the Senate, look at.
Speaker 9 (17:07):
His forty years in office, there's nothing that you look
at and you say, hey, this guy really represents Texans,
especially Texans Texas primary voters, the way we want to
be represented. And so after twenty three years, I can
say it's been a failure. I can't point to things
that he's done that I'm proud of. I can talk
about things that he has done that I wished he
(17:28):
hadn't done.
Speaker 8 (17:29):
And so there's no reason.
Speaker 9 (17:30):
Maybe if he's from Maine, we're okay with this, but
if we're from Texas, we need somebody more like Ted Kruz,
not somebody like John Cornyn who just goes along to
get along and answer and answers to Washington and not
the Texas voters.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
You're one hundred percent right about that. It's something that
I've implored my fellow Texans and we're all Red Staters
about that we owe the country better than what we
give them, Like you pointed out Maine, Alaska. Okay, that's
going to be what it's going to be. Texas should
be sending the most blood, the blood red conservative you
(18:04):
could possibly find. And John Cornin's there leading the charge
on gun control.
Speaker 9 (18:10):
Well exactly, And I can tell you this, I mean,
no Democratic president, including Joe Biden's going to be congratulating me.
Speaker 8 (18:16):
On work that I've done for you know, the country.
Speaker 9 (18:18):
And that's exactly what happened with John Coryn when he
pushed through his gun legislation that restricted ownership and restricted
gun rights. This is a guy that was congratulated by
Joe Biden. That tells you exactly what you need to know.
That's never gonna happen with me.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
What happens to these people when they go to d C.
Because obviously, you know, when you're a senator from a
state like Texas, will just make it about Texas. You
understand who the people of Texas are and what they want.
Why do you lose your mind in Washington DC? Is
it the power, is it the money?
Speaker 3 (18:50):
What is it?
Speaker 9 (18:52):
I think it does happen that people change, But I
don't think that's John Cornyn's story. I think when he
got elected during the Bush reign, he is exactly what
went We were just trying to elect Republicans. We hadn't
had very many Republicans in Texas. We elected John Corny.
He was a Bush guy and he was there to
do what the Bushes wanted to do. He still is
and the reality is now we are a solid Republican state,
(19:13):
and we don't have to accept we're just going to
have a guy that go up there and has the
R by his name. He's going to vote, you know,
somewhat Republican, but he's not going to get the job done.
And he's going to do things like oppose the border wall.
He is going to oppose Donald Trump both personally as
an elected official, but also on many of his issues.
Speaker 8 (19:30):
And he is going to.
Speaker 9 (19:31):
Pass restrictive gun legislation and that's not what we need
from Texas.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
How's the GOP response been, both inside the state and nationally.
I say this as someone who has challenged an establishment
guy for Congress and felt what that's like with all
the big money people, all the big shots telling you
you have to wait your turn, you can't do this. Oh,
I remember all the lines. I'm sure you've gotten all
of them.
Speaker 9 (19:57):
I've gotten them all, and mostly from outside of Texas,
mostly from you know, Senate leadership and the other you
know establishment people. Some within Texas that were definitely part
of that establishment group, But the majority of Texas that
I've talked to are very excited.
Speaker 8 (20:12):
I mean, I didn't just like come up with this
idea I've been.
Speaker 9 (20:15):
Out testing, I've been out talking, I've been out meeting
with hundreds of Republicans, and every time I brought it up,
it was an overwhelmingly positive response.
Speaker 8 (20:23):
We are desperate for a change.
Speaker 9 (20:26):
We are desperate after twenty four years of John Corny,
to have a choice.
Speaker 8 (20:30):
And so this that's what this is. This is a choice.
Speaker 9 (20:32):
And I can guarantee this. John Corner is not going
to run on his record. He's not going to because
he can't. He's not going to run on my record.
This is all going to be personal attacks, and that's
what he's all about. He cannot stand on his own
two feet. And the only thing he can say is,
you know, now, I'm supporting Trump after criticizing him for
the last you know, eight years, now, Johnny cum lately,
John Cornyn is in the in the in the fold
(20:55):
for the president for the first time ever.
Speaker 8 (20:57):
And that's gonna last. How long it's gonna last till
we're done with the elections.
Speaker 1 (21:01):
Of course. Oh well, he was asked about you. Here's
what he said. I'm sure you've seen it.
Speaker 8 (21:05):
Do you have any veal concern about Paxton running to
the right of.
Speaker 10 (21:08):
You in his primary?
Speaker 11 (21:11):
Well, The biggest potential loser is President Trump's agenda. I've
been a supporter of the president during his first term
of office and that's continued during his current term. Mister
Paxton has a checker background. He is a con man
and a fraud and I think the people of Texas
(21:32):
know that.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
It's also predictable and tired. You already pointed out what
it's going to be. It's going to be a never
ending commercial spree of Trump, Trump, Trump, I love Trump.
I love Trump, even though he's done everything in his
power to undermine everything to make America great again. Agenda
is it's going to be Donald Trump's name as he
desperately sucks up trying to earn that endorsement.
Speaker 8 (21:54):
Well, he just talked about fraud and a con man.
Speaker 9 (21:57):
That's exactly what we just saw there talking about I've
been viper Donald Trump from the beginning. That is a
con job and that is a fraudulent statement. That is
not true. He said in twenty sixteen when Trump was
earn nomin he was an albatross around our neck, and
this time he insinuated that he was at criminal. Of course,
John was a judge and he should know better than
to insinuate that people are criminals without proof, which is
(22:20):
what he did in my case and in the president's case.
And then of course he said that he would not
be supporting Donald Trump and that we should have a
better new nominee. So just looking at what he said
in that clip, that's what you call a fraudulent statement.
That's what you call a con man. And that's supposedly
what I am. And there he is lying to the
public and lying to Texans.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
All right, where do we go from here? Give the
people watching details because this is a national race that
has national implications. Taking out one of these losers is
really important for the whole country. So the people watching,
what can they do? Can they do anything? When is
all this?
Speaker 9 (22:57):
Oh, look, this is going to be a battle of
Texas versus Washington establishment. And the money is going to
come from all over the country. For John Cornyn to
let plenty of money from outside sources. He will raise
some money in Texas, but my money is going to
have to come from the grassroots all over the country.
And I am convinced that we can raise enough. We
(23:17):
don't have to outraise them. We just have to be
in the game of something Two to one three to
run within that range, we can beat John Cornyn and
we can.
Speaker 8 (23:26):
We can win this election.
Speaker 9 (23:29):
Where do people go, Kenpaxson dot com and you can
go donate right there and start the start the momentum.
Small contributions are or we want them because it shows support,
It shows the difference between me and him, because he
will not be getting those small contributions, not in any
large volume.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
Kenpaxton dot com. If you got five bucks, give it,
you got five hundred, give it. This is critically important.
I'm asking you to do it. How many times do
I do that and never do that? I'm doing it
right now, mister Attorney General. Thank you, I appreciate. I'm
very much behind you. Go get them. We needed to win.
We cannot survive as a country if we continue to
(24:09):
lose our testosterone. And I know this is an uncomfortable
conversation I do, but you should understand that we've lost
fifty percent of our testosterone levels in the last fifty years. Now,
that's not your fault, that's something else going on. Look,
there's estrogen in the water, a lot of it now,
(24:29):
estrogen that was never there before. It's evaporating our t levels.
So how do we fix that? How do we fight back?
We can't continue like this. That's what a male vitality
stack from Chalk can do for you. Natural herbal supplements
of the highest quality. Go get a subscription two three months.
You're gonna feel like a brand new person. Believe me,
(24:53):
it's it's life changing. Go to Chalk dot com slash
jessetv subscriptions. You save a pile of money. Go. You
will feel better shortly.
Speaker 12 (25:13):
My mission is clear. I'm focused, I'm prepared, I'm ready.
I've been trained by the best. I went to Howard
University that overturned legal segregation in this country. I've been
taught in those classrooms with our good Marshall once taught
(25:34):
I'm not afraid of no President Donald Trump. We're ready
for you. We're coming for you. We're standing up for you.
We're fighting on. We're not going down. Sailing victory, my friends,
is clear. It's now and I'm not waiting four years.
I'm waiting two. I tell us speaker by the name
(25:54):
of H. King Jeffries, comes to bring us some rest.
Come on, ladies, it's to us we say this democracy before,
we'll say that. Now, let's go.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
I don't know if that was hard for you, but
it's hard for me if she was in my ear
almost had to take this out. It's just so obnoxious.
It shoting me now. But buddy, Mike Cernovich, filmmaker, author,
actually has another one coming, which I'm gonna ask him
about here in just a moment. Mike, on top of
the fact she's obnoxious, what do you make of all this?
She going down for mortgage fraud or something. What's happening
(26:32):
with all this?
Speaker 13 (26:33):
Yeah, everyone knows if your conservative, filing for a mortgage
application is very stressful because mortgage brokers would just throw
in any kind of number and you have to say, no,
you can't do this.
Speaker 6 (26:45):
You don't.
Speaker 13 (26:46):
Don't get me involved in some kind of nonsense because
your scummy agency. And with Letitia James, it was she,
not the mortgage broker who falsified data allegedly, although it
looks quite strong to me in a mortgage application, there
were multiple issues that could not be attributed to errors
or that she couldn't blame the mortgage broker for and
(27:09):
now she is facing investigation for that as she should.
Speaker 1 (27:14):
Okay, Mike, you're a lot more well versed in the
law and most things than I am, what are we
looking on here? Is she going to prison? Is she
going to get a little five hundred dollars? Fine? What
kind of charges are we looking at here for this stuff?
Speaker 13 (27:28):
Well they can if you look at how they charge cases,
these can be charged aggressively because they can be charged
not just this mortgage fraud, but all some money laundering.
And if you look at how they charge the Trump cases,
you can make it a very simple case that would
plead down to a misdemeanor, or they could make it
multiple felonies. Because the Nash case I think was illustrative.
(27:48):
D Nash was indicted for allegedly using straw donors to
help a friend's campaign, and he said, I'm going to
go to trial. So then what happened was the SDNY
under that really scuzzy guy, I forget his name, but
he really is a real scummy lowlife guy, and then
he refiled the case to say, well, because you use
(28:09):
straw donors, you knowingly got someone to file a federal
tax return that was false and that's a mandatory minimum
of five years. And that's why Denesh ended up pleading guilty.
So there are a lot of different ways that cases
like these can be charged. Ordinarily, it would be a
felony that you would plead down to a misdemeanor, and
she would have to be disbarred because it would be
(28:31):
considered a crime of moral turpitude since it was a
financial fraud.
Speaker 6 (28:35):
So, if I'm boring, you just interrupt me.
Speaker 13 (28:37):
But if you're a lawyer, you're not just subject to
the criminal laws of the land, of course, but you're
subject to state our jurisdiction. So if you file a
false mortgage application that isn't your mortgage broker doing funny
business after you've filled it out honestly, then you would
be guilty of a crime of moral turpitude because that
(28:57):
would be financial fraud, and then of course you would
be disbarred. Although as we've seen, the states like California
and New York and DC have a different set of
standards for Democrat lawyers and for Republicans.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
Yeah, what a shock, all right, Look, Hey, I'm thrilled
that at least one scumbag might be facing some form
of justice. Right, I'll take anything I can get at
this point in time. What do you make right now
of the job, Pam BONDI we're going to focus on
her specifically of the job she's doing. I'm not a lawyer.
(29:29):
I'm doing the best I can to be patient, and
I'm telling myself every night, Mike, when I go to bed,
that she's just busy crossing the t's and dot in
the eyes, and government indictments are coming down soon. This
government person's going to be arrested, and this government person's
going to be arrested. That's what I tell myself so
I can sleep at night. Mike, what do you think.
Speaker 13 (29:49):
Well, I don't want to play the whole as a
lawyer card, because I never like to do that because
I'm not Douglas Murray. But I'll say that as a lawyer.
So it took you a second, you got one. So
as a lawyer with a fair amount of expertise on
these issues, the issue that you have is, and Trump
really had this problem in his first term, is all
(30:11):
of the Department of Justice lawyers were pro Biden regime.
So Biden comes in, he has this fascist attorney general
and he's got all the line lawyers ready to file paperwork. Well,
instead of those line lawyers properly enforcing the law under
BONDI they're sabotaging, they're slow walking, A bunch of them
are resigning. They're all running through New York Times and
(30:32):
throwing tantrums. So they just don't have the manpower that
you would thank. Ed Martin, for example, is his nomination
to a US attorney for the District of Columbia is
being held up by Adam Schiff, a Russiagate collusion hoaxer.
So if you're on the outside, you would say, my goodness,
why is it that there were almost one hundred Jay
(30:55):
six ers already indicted at this time during Biden's administration.
We can barely get someone on a very clean case
of mortgage fraud. And the answer is because every attorney
hiring process, starting under Barack Obama, the FBI, and the
DOJ was to get people into the Stossi So they
(31:16):
were all on board. They're ready to go, they're ready
to frame people for crimes, and the Body administration is
having trouble at getting lawyers even confirmed to positions where
they're needed. So this is I'm not a plan truster, everybody.
I always tell people go read what I had to
say about Trump during his first term, because people even
try to dig up tweets to get one over on me,
and I was like, oh no, I was very frustrated.
(31:37):
I'm not a plan truster, but in this case, you
really have. You have Mangino, you have cash, and then
you have everybody in there who's the stassi And if
you look at Christopher Ray bragged about it. I believe
forty of current FBI employees were hired during the Biden regime.
Speaker 6 (31:55):
Right, It's going to take.
Speaker 13 (31:56):
A long time to unravel this and find out who's
good and who isn't. So I think people should continue
being aggressive in a civil way about these issues. But
I don't think it's fair to compare the timeline of
the Trump second term with the Biden regimes first term.
Speaker 1 (32:16):
Okay, that's fair. Is it reasonable to assume we will
get these things at some point in the next four
years or is it too far gone? Mike? And I'm
almost scared to ask the question because I'm afraid I
think I already know what the answer is. Are there
too many cancers in place to be removed?
Speaker 6 (32:38):
Yeah?
Speaker 13 (32:39):
The difficult question, and I think about this a lot too,
is we're certainly not going to get what we want,
but we're already getting things. Brian Aughten, who was a
would terrorize you know, innocent Christian people. Chuck Grassley revealed
him as one of the guys responsible for the Hunter
Biden laptop cover up scheme.
Speaker 6 (32:58):
He's been removed.
Speaker 13 (32:59):
So things are happening, but it unfortunate that we're fighting
personnel decisions that we're a decade in the making. They
are all these FBI agents and DOJ officials. Some of
them have civil service protections, so you can't just come
in and remove them. Judges are jamming everything up. What
we have to do is take the wines that we can,
(33:19):
and we have to keep pushing. I do like the
idea of impeaching judges, not because I think the Senate
will convict them, because they absolutely will not, but because
it'll give Congress jurisdiction to issue subpoenas. So if I'm
you and I'm talking to Chip Roy and I'm talking
to I'm not just saying like in the hypothetical world,
if I'm talking to these guys, I would say, look,
(33:40):
we know the Senate's not going to convict Bosberg. We
know this, but the only way that we can get
jurisdiction and start issuing subpoenas to find out what is
happening in that DC Stase show trial. Stalin fiefdom is
to is to investigate impeachment, because then we have congressional oversight,
we have congressional subpoena power. Then we can issue subpoenas
(34:01):
to Judge Bozberg and say, how is it that these
cases are randomly assigned but you always seem to get them.
Do you have the luckiest hand in the world.
Speaker 6 (34:10):
Should you start playing the lottery?
Speaker 13 (34:11):
Should you go to Vegas because you'd be a billionaire,
become a stocktriator. How is it that you're getting all
these randomly assigned things. As of right now, no one
has jurisdiction to demand answers. A congress member Jim Jim,
Jordan chip Roy or somebody can't just write a letter
and get that information. But if there's an impeachment inquiry
and there's a committee, that committee absolutely has jurisdiction and
(34:33):
they can start issuing subpoenas, and I can tell you
that will put the fear of God into John Roberts
and these DC judges. They will know that they have
to respond to these subpoenas or else the judges can
be held in contempt by Congress and then they can
be indicted the way Steve Bannon was indicted for contempt
of Congress.
Speaker 6 (34:49):
So we one hundred percent what we need to do.
Speaker 13 (34:51):
The best thing we can do right now is say, look,
we know, we know Mitch isn't going to convict any
of these judges.
Speaker 6 (34:57):
Irrelevant, irrelevant.
Speaker 13 (34:59):
This is about I was having jurisdiction and oversight and
the power to start issuing subpoenas to get these judges
under oath and to get this under control.
Speaker 1 (35:09):
Who's Gunzalo Lira?
Speaker 6 (35:12):
Great question.
Speaker 13 (35:13):
Apparently nobody knows because there was a guy who writes
for the Atlantic and he's always talking about how great
Ukraine democracy is, and I go, what about gonzal Era?
And then he's sanctimoniously says, well, how do you expect
me to know about everybody? And then he said, I
bet you that people at the Orange County shopping malls
that you go to don't know who he is. Like, yeah, dumb, dumb,
(35:34):
you're proven my point. You guys had a media blackout
on Gonzala Lira. And I consider Gonzala Lira the litmus
test for whether I consider someone to be a propagandist
or a person who has a good faith debate with
me about.
Speaker 6 (35:50):
Ukraine, a good faith disagreement, you could.
Speaker 13 (35:53):
Say, as you you know you, and I could just say, hey,
what was what was he doing going to Ukraine making
videos callings the lins dictator? Right, he's lucky he didn't
get beat up. But then they killed them. They took
him prisoner when he was trying to leave the country.
This is all on video. And the Zelenski regime and
the Ukrainians were so psychotic that instead of saying, thank goodness,
(36:15):
we got rid of this wacko, get him out of
the country. What a problem, right, they instead decided to
kidnap him, torture him, and kill him. And then, of
course when asked, they'll say he had a medical condition.
When that he would say, well, why didn't you get
a medical treatment in the US. So Gonzalaalira is an
American who made YouTube videos that the Zelinsky regime didn't like.
(36:35):
He was held in custody. He tried to leave the
country when he was more or less told to by
Ukrainian law enforcement, who said it would be a good
idea if you kind of just disappeared.
Speaker 6 (36:46):
He tried to leave.
Speaker 13 (36:47):
He documented it all and then he died in a hospital,
a victim of torture of the Zelensky regime. The Great
Democracy and our great Western ally.
Speaker 1 (36:57):
Are good friends. Are good friends, Mike, what's this movie?
Are you allowed to talk about it yet? Or am
I not supposed to ask? I didn't text you before.
Speaker 13 (37:05):
I'm working on two. Yeah, I'm working on two. One
is still under wraps. But the big one we're doing
is about the meaning of life. And it's called meaning
one word, and it's about the meaning of life. We
just spent two months in the Amazon looking at what
might have been megalists with Timothy Alberino, tracing the you know,
the origin of humanity. We looked at some people doing ayahuasca.
(37:28):
Talk to ayahuasca people. We're going to churches, We're going
to We're talking to people of all different kinds of life.
And trying to make a movie, which is an ambitious project, is.
Speaker 6 (37:42):
One way to put it.
Speaker 13 (37:43):
Causes me a lot of stress would be another way
to put it, like, Oh, I'm going to make a
movie about the meaning of life. What a DOUCHEARONI right,
my god, you know what a what a douche? Well,
that's what we're trying to do.
Speaker 1 (37:54):
Though, Gosh, I want to go to the Amazon Mike.
I'll talk to you so brother, appreciate you. I hate
that corporate America left us and I hate that. I
know I sound like an old man when I talk
about that, but let me just say, for you younger
people watching, it was not like this when when I
(38:15):
was a kid, and I'm not ancient and I'm forty
three years old, you could turn on television. You wouldn't
get any politics in the corporate ads. It was shoes
and gatorades and whatever catchy jingles there used to be
jingles on TV. Now corporations use your money against you.
It's frustrating, but we have to fight back. We can't
(38:36):
just shrug our shoulders and say, well, times have changed.
We have to fight back. Who's your cell phone provider? Verizon,
ATNT and T Mobile hatred guts. Switch to the cell
phone company that's on the same five G network and
doesn't hate your guts. You'll save a fortune. You don't
have to have a new phone or a new phone number.
You save money. You switch. You patronize a company that
(38:57):
actually loves you. Pure Talk pure talk dot Com slash JESSETV.
All Right, let's talk about well, it's gonna be about
the military, but it's about the communist purge here for
(39:17):
a couple moments. Remember this, Remember, as we just talked
about in the opening, these people are out to destroy
and they will destroy everything if they can, and they
will most definitely destroy wherever they are. That's just how
it works. If you bring a communist into your church,
your church will be destroyed by it. If you're big
(39:38):
in into your business, your business will be destroyed by
it because they will eat everything in front of them.
They're like animals. Really, that's really how you can really
think about communists. And now let's talk about our military.
You see, because don't think for one second they drop
the communist uniform when they put on the uniform of
the United States of America. Not at all. They view
(39:59):
their everywhere wherever they are. They view their role as
fighting for the revolution. And don't think that that changed
when Donald Trump took over. And my point for this
little talk we're about to have is that Pete hag Seth,
who's doing a very good job, he will need all
four years and he will need to be vicious. Remember
when Jdvans traveled to Greenland and said this.
Speaker 14 (40:21):
What we think is going to happen is that the
Greenlanders are going to choose through self determination to become
independent of Denmark, and then we're going to have conversations
with the people of Greenland from there. So I think
that talking about anything too far in the future is
way too premature. We do not think that military force
is ever going to be necessary. We think this makes sense,
(40:44):
and because we think the people of Greenland are rational
and good, we think we're going to be able to
cut a deal Donald Trump's style to ensure the security
of this territory but also the United States of America.
Speaker 1 (40:56):
Okay, you might disagree with that, but it's certainly nothing
radical or insane. Yeah. The spaceport's commander on the ground,
Susanna Meyers. This is the email she sent out. Now,
remember these people are all above her in the chain
of command. Do you think Susanna Myers set aside her
(41:16):
communism because she put on the uniform and achieved the
rank of colonel.
Speaker 3 (41:20):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (41:21):
I do not presume to understand the current politics, but
what I do know is the concerns of the US
and administration discussed by Vice President Vance on Friday, are
not reflective of space space. She just flat out and
came out and said, I don't care what JD. Vance said.
That's not my agenda, that's not what we believe here.
They can't help themselves. Susannah Chatfield vice admiral. That's a
(41:46):
big boy position in the United States Navy. She had
to be purged last week. She used to give speeches
like this.
Speaker 15 (41:53):
And we've also heard about the meaningful participation of women
in the security and defense sectors. We have learned about
the importance of gender inclusive approaches. We will be left
with a professional military ready to get after the needs
of the nation, with highly talented, diverse and capable people
(42:16):
before us, beside us, and behind us. And I would
say that this is exactly what the women piece and
Security agenda seeks to achieve.
Speaker 1 (42:31):
My point in this is not that we got a
couple out. My point is American communists have been embedding
these little tumors inside of our government at every level,
including the military, for years. Barack Obama is really the
one who turned this into overdrives. So when you think
about that, Barack obamasand and eight the twenty sixteen, then
(42:57):
we get a little brief four year reprieve didn't remove
them the first time. Then Joe Biden came in did
this again an overdrive. We now have twelve years of
focused communist effort putting these little cancers in every single
nook and cranny. We have so much work to do. Remember,
(43:18):
Linda Fagon.
Speaker 10 (43:20):
We currently have nearly forty percent women enrolled at the
Coastguard Academy. I'm really excited about the talent and the
diversity that I see coming through the academy. My daughter
is in the Coastguard as a lieutenant, and there is
just nothing but opportunity for her and all of the
men and women that have joined the service. I'm really
excited about the future as we look ahead.
Speaker 1 (43:45):
There's a lot of fagans we have to get rid of.
Let's help. We're up to the task, all.
Speaker 3 (43:51):
Right, all right, it's time.
Speaker 1 (44:07):
To lighten the mood. And I'm an Ohio State fan.
I was born in Ohio, lived there until I was ten.
You really didn't have any choice. Ohio State Buckeyes won
the national titles, showed up the White House. That's a
good thing. What was less good was jd Vance vice
President of the United States of America. He broke the
national Championship trophy. J D was a good sport about
(44:47):
it in the end, though, all right, I'll see them,
am
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season
Daniel Jeremiah of Move the Sticks and Gregg Rosenthal of NFL Daily join forces to break down every team's needs this offseason.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.