The Rod and Greg Show: DataRepublican Interview; Dems Out themselves; FEMA spending

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
How are you? Everybody? Welcome to the Rod and Greg
show on this Wingman Wednesday.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
Special Wingmen Wenesday.

Speaker 1 (00:04):
Sure is, and we'll tell you why here in just
a second. I'm Rod Arquett, I'm citizen Greg Hughes. All right,
we have got a lot to get to today, but
we should mention this right away. Coming up in just
about an hour, an exclusive interview with Data Republican. Now
you can explain Greg what Data Republican is.

Speaker 2 (00:23):
Folks, if you're on X and you've been following Doge,
they have been uncovering an inordinate amount of information about nonprofits,
really starting from USAID. They stumbled across USAID by just
looking to see what entities from the Treasury Department, we're
not following the executive orders that President Trump was signing.
They had one hundred points that they check in certain organizations.

(00:45):
They came across USAID and they were not in compliance
in ninety eight of those one hundred points they were
looking at, which is extraordinarily Yeah, that's bad. So they
had to keep looking and they kept peeling back this onion,
peeling back this onion, and they start funding money and
funds and Congress knows nothing about and it just keeps
getting deeper and deeper. Well, they're doing the good work.

(01:07):
Data Republican is a website, and data Republican is a
person who, through AI and coding is able to take
the data that's uncovered and publicly available information and connect
what the Left and the Unit Party and the swamp
never thought a human being could connect. And so data
Republican is a X site and this person has created

(01:30):
a search engine as well as has shown examples of
how the flow of funds have gone completely outside of Congress,
and the billions and billions of dollars that not only
go overseas in ways we would never be okay with,
while issues in the United States are not being addressed,
but where the money sits and stays in profits both
A hate to say it, but the Unit Party. We've

(01:52):
known this Republicans.

Speaker 1 (01:53):
And the Democrats.

Speaker 2 (01:54):
And if you start looking at who the Republican names are,
they look like the Unit Party type that we would
think they would be. But this person has it, doesn't
want to be dosed, and so they have they have
maintained their anonymity strictly. Ladies and gentlemen, we are going
to interview data republic.

Speaker 1 (02:12):
She has agreed to go. We can say because she
points us out, she's here in Utah. Yeah, Yeah, she's
here in Utah.

Speaker 2 (02:18):
She used to be on her It used to be
on her uh on her biography. I don't see it
right now, but this is someone that's here but no
one knows her. Nobody knows, nobody knows. And it took me.
Citizen Hughes is on the job, folks, I'm here for you.
I've been doing some digging. I've been looking someone who knows,
someone who knows someone who reached out. Got a little
bit of a ping back from an email. It's just
it's a long it's like my own.

Speaker 1 (02:39):
We founder, but we found Elon Musk has even used
her information. No, he retweets it all, retweets it all. So,
Charlie Kirk, so does everyone. Actually, I'm telling you there's
She is three hundred and seventy thousand followers right now.
She is the only source in America right now, This
Data Republican is the only source in America right now
that can connect dots on what they're uncovering. And so

(03:01):
you can put search keywords you taught into the search
engine and you can see the nonprofits, and then you
can see the biograph you have looking you'll say if
it has a USA I D flow chart to it,
and if you click that link, you'll all of a
sudden you'll find out you'll see how in the movement
of money. Folks, if you go on X and you
go to Data Republican and you go and work on
this search engine, it has to be so unbelievably coordinated

(03:26):
to do it the way they're doing it, because you
you it would be more than a full time job
to just find the sources that give to the sources
that give you. They are mapping this out in ways
that the American people, they've been just living their lives.

Speaker 2 (03:38):
They had no idea. Only today did she begin to
have interviews. We are one of only two, and I
think that Blaze is going to have one tomorrow. But
we are that we have broke this and we are
the little engine that could, the Rod and Gregsha.

Speaker 1 (03:54):
And you'll get to hear that interview coming up in
the five o'clock hour. A fascinating, very nice person, really
nice person, and we'll we'll get to that information because
you'll be it's amazing how she's been able to follow
all the issues. She's gone down the rabbit hole very deep.

Speaker 2 (04:10):
Follow her posts too. There's a bit of a narrative
there and she'll tell you what how disturbing is what
they're uncovering. But I will tell you that this what's
so exciting about the times we're in right now, rot
is we have a president that's moving so quickly and
wants to be transparent and every in every way, and
this site brings the American people along. It's not it's

(04:31):
not an Inspector General report that on eight pages you
have to find it. We're bringing that information front and
center Data Republican at Data Republican on x if you
haven't seen, and she gave us a shout out after
the after the post or after the interview, she posted
that that it was good, great to be on the show,
and I'm telling you you're gonna you're not gonna want
to miss the interview. And then we'll also e Ray

(04:53):
will also put that on the podcast form when we're finished.

Speaker 1 (04:55):
So that's just what just one segment of what we've
got today. We're on talking about how the Democrats are
basically outing themselves because of all these cuts going on
to the government. Apparently Democrats like really big government to
pay government officials a lot of money. Oh yeah, are
tax dollars. Absolutely, that's what they're for, big government. It's

(05:17):
talk about that. Uh Pam bonding. She's not letting any
grass grow under her feet. Just a few hours ago
announced they are now filing charges against New York Governor
Catherine Hogel and Ladicia James, the attorney general in that state,
for making illegal immigrants legal immigrants. And she says, you
can't do that.

Speaker 2 (05:37):
Yeah, they can't. They can't do it, absolutely.

Speaker 1 (05:40):
So they're filing charges against it. A little bit later on,
we'll talk about a bill which is putting some pressure
on Salt Lake City to clean up his act. By
the way, the police chief resigned today. Mike Brown done. Guns.

Speaker 2 (05:51):
I will tell you there might be a connection to
the leg that's coming through. There might be I might
be connecting some dots here.

Speaker 1 (05:59):
So we've got a lot to get to today. It's
going to be a great show, So we invite you
to stay with us today. Now I have one request
we as we start the show today, Greg, do you
think he'll listen? Who Trump to who me?

Speaker 2 (06:13):
Yes? I have a request, Oh for the president. Yeah,
for the president.

Speaker 1 (06:16):
You're ready.

Speaker 2 (06:17):
Well, we're kind of a big deal now that we
have that. A Republicans, you know what their request is,
what slow down?

Speaker 3 (06:23):
No?

Speaker 1 (06:24):
Heavens no, I mean here, I mean, give you an
example of the guy today. Right, so I wake up
this morning, First thing I hear Donald Trump has been
on the phone this morning with Vladimir Putin and they've
been talking about a piece agreement over Ukraine. Then he
got on the phone with Selensky, had a conversation with
him and by the way, we're going to get together
and we're going to figure this thing out. That's before

(06:45):
most Americans had even had breakfast this morning.

Speaker 2 (06:47):
Greg, I, it's like Geez and the regime media and
the cave and they are losing their minds because they
can't they he doesn't stay still long enough for them
to attack him thoroughly like they used to be able
to do. And by the way, how about having Elon
Musk is a shield human shield. He's now getting a
lot of the attention that would otherwise come at him.

Speaker 1 (07:09):
There was a Democratic representative from California today who basically said, look,
we can't slow these guys down. The only way to
slow them down is to bring weapons to the party.
Yeah yeah, really, I mean this is where they're going.
So then Trump announces the Department of Education. He thinks
it's basically a con job and he wants to wipe
it out completely. Yet let's just take it down. We

(07:32):
don't care anymore. And then on top of that, he
fired the top watchdog for usai D, basically saying he
wasted money on education and al Qaeda terrorist and drag shows.
And by the way, buddy, you're fired.

Speaker 2 (07:47):
That's right, had breakfast this more yeah for that, it
just more the excuse and an apologist maker general.

Speaker 1 (07:57):
Yeah, yeah, pretty amazing. All right, coming up on the
Routing Greg Show. Great to be with you on this
Wingman Wednesday. How the Democrats are outing themselves. That's next
right here on talk radio one oh five to nine knrs.
Breaking news just coming across. A federal judge is allowing
the Trump administration to move forward with its plan to
downsize the federal workforce by offering employees the option to

(08:20):
resign now but stay on the payroll through September. A
judge in Whereas is US District Judge George O'Toole and
appointing of Bill Clinton did not address whether the deferred
resignation program is legal. Instead, the judge ruled late this
afternoon that the several unions that are suing over the
program do not have legal standing to pursue it in court.

(08:42):
So victory for President Trump.

Speaker 2 (08:43):
Today about time. I don't even know why we have
to go to lower courts. I don't know why Supreme
Court can't just go get all this stuff taken care.

Speaker 1 (08:49):
Of now, just taken out. Well, we talked about this
yesterday that there are now some liberal commentators out there
who are questioning the democratic tactics against what is going
on with USAID and DOE in general, and are they
outing themselves now? Well, joining us on our Newsmaker line
to talk about that is Cheryl Chumley. She is the
online opinion editor at the Washington Times. Always great to

(09:10):
have Cheryl on the show. Cheryl, how are you? And
welcome to the Rod and Greg Show.

Speaker 4 (09:14):
Hey, thanks for having me.

Speaker 2 (09:15):
It's great to be with you. Cheryl.

Speaker 1 (09:17):
What do you make of what the Democrats are doing
right now to try and catch you up or counter
whatever Donald Trump and Elon Musk are doing.

Speaker 4 (09:25):
Yeah, it's baffling to me, because what they're basically doing
is making the case that waste and corruption shouldn't be
outed and stopped. I mean, the only people who could
possibly oppose the investigation into USAID and the halt to

(09:46):
tax dollars going to purposes that are really corrupt, perhaps criminal,
and definitely a waste are those who are guilty of
advancing the corruptional criminal acts and waste.

Speaker 2 (10:02):
Cheryl, here's here's my take, And I'm just wondering how
if you would agree or if you think there's something
different going on when I see the amount of money
they've been shuffling around and I'm watching it entity after entity,
and how I believe it's being washed and how where
it ends up. Ultimately, it seems like a lot of
that stays in the pockets of the people that receive it.
To me, it looks like Robert Baron's first political agenda

(10:26):
far second, would you agree with that?

Speaker 4 (10:29):
Oh yeah, there's definitely graft involved, right, kickbacks, and I
mean one hand washes the other, and honestly, it's not
just USAI D right. I think that this is just
a drop in a very large bucket, because if you
start getting into all the federal agencies and how they
do business with all the NGOs, right, and then you

(10:52):
know the nonprofits that feed into the NGOs that feed
into the federal agencies, and the money goes overseas and
back to a Marria overseas again back to Congress. It's
going to be this long train of abuse of power
and abuse of tax dollars.

Speaker 1 (11:10):
Cheryl, how do you think the republic the publican general,
is responding to what they see the Democrats doing. I
mean even had one Democrat today, I think his last
name is Garcia out of California calling on Democrats to weaponize,
to bring weapons to the battle against Elon Musk and
Donald Trump. How do you think the public overall is
reacting to us they see the Democrats doing right now?

Speaker 4 (11:32):
Well, I think most in the American public are in
favor of what Elon Musk and Donald Trump and his
administration are trying to do in so far as to
root out waste in government. And I think most in
the American public are looking at the Democrats like they're
on the wrong side of the message here for once, right,
Republicans have the narrative in their pocket. Usually Republicans are

(11:57):
trying to make a case of principle right that it
doesn't resonate with the American people. It doesn't condense well
into a three second bullet point statement on national TV.
It takes a little explanation, and it deals with morals
and rights and wrongs. Well, for once, Republicans have an
easy message, right, They're just trying to stop the waste.

(12:18):
Democrats are standing in their way.

Speaker 2 (12:21):
You know, there is an observation made that if if
you asked Elon Musk three weeks ago, what are you doing?
He would say, I'm trying to, you know, deal with
this deficit. I'm trying to shrink the deficit that we have.
If you ask him today, he says, I'm actually trying
to preserve a democratic republic. It's the entire effort, and
its seriousness and tone have changed. Do you believe I

(12:44):
think do you think, like, let's just take for example,
the Department of Education. Do you think that there's as
much waste as they uncovered it to Treasury in the
Department of Education where it will be easier to dismantle
the Department of Education if there's this much corruption and graft.

Speaker 4 (13:00):
Well, I think with the Department of Education, there's waste
but I think more with the Department of Education, there's
political influence there, right, and I think the waste is
maybe a side street or a side street to a
side street. You've got your unions that feed into the
politicians who are supported by the union members, who then

(13:22):
both push a leftist agenda through the Department of Education
down into the public school system. So I think with
education it's going to be more a matter of political
agenda and far leftist even Marxist ideology that needs to
be crumbled and dismantled, and not as much heavy on
the money, the dollars and cents.

Speaker 1 (13:44):
Sueryl, how much What kind of an effort is it
going to take for the Trump administration and Republicans in
general to keep up this narrative? I mean, right now,
this is part of the news cycle. You know, you
think it's going to run out of gas and something
new comes up. You've got another couple of days of
this being in the news. I mean, how much life
does this have right now? Do you think?

Speaker 3 (14:04):
Well?

Speaker 4 (14:05):
I think it has at least four years right for Trump,
for Trump and the people that he has surrounded himself with.

Speaker 2 (14:13):
This is not about a narrative. This is not about
a media cycle.

Speaker 4 (14:16):
This is about what he campaigned upon and what his
vision for America is, and it's definitely the America First,
make America great again. He backs that with action now
on the other side, right, it just depends the Democrats,
the media cycles, the deep state, the anti Maga types.
They are just going to jump through hoops and keep

(14:37):
changing up narratives to oppose this president and his administration
using whatever messaging they think works at that particular period.

Speaker 1 (14:47):
Going to be interesting to follow. Cheryl has always great
having me on the show. Enjoy the rest of the evening.

Speaker 2 (14:52):
Thank you you as well.

Speaker 1 (14:53):
Thank you now Cheryl Chumbley. She is with the Washington Times,
they're online editor talking about Donald Trump and how the
Dems are now outing themselves. If you're just joining us,
we broke this news a moment ago. Federal judge is
allowing President Trump to move forward with his plans to
downsize the federal workforce. We'll have more on that coming
down right here on the Running Greg Show. Data Republican

(15:15):
has been doing a lot of work taking a look
at what Elon Musk and his nerd Army has come
up with when it comes to US AID and great
I don't think people will believe what she has found.

Speaker 2 (15:27):
She has it's been the source and it's just brought
daylight and it's brought real. She has a search engine.
She's just been able to bring a reality to things.
Numbers and amounts. We couldn't really get our heads around
this website. This at Data Republican. She's done a phenomen
elon Musk is reposting her stuff. Everybody. There's everybody, and

(15:48):
the anonymity has been strict. Today is the first day. Yeah,
she's entertained interviews.

Speaker 1 (15:52):
Yeah, and she's from Utah as a matter of fact,
which is kind of nice. We'll talk to her in
that interview coming up at five oh five. All right, now,
Pam Bondi, the new Attorney General the Justice Department announcing
today they're going to file charges against the State of
New York and its Governor, Kathy Hochel and Attorney General
Letitia James for failing to comply with federal laws by
shielding illegal immigrants. It is just starting to roll. Well,

(16:17):
what did the Biden administration do when it came to
dealing with illegal migrants into New York City and around
the country. Joining us on our Newsmaker line to talk
about that is Andrew Arthur. Andrew is the Resident Fellow
and Law and Policy at the Center for Immigration Studies. Andrew,
how are you and welcome to the rodd In Greg Show.
Thanks for joining us.

Speaker 5 (16:34):
Andrew brought up doing great, just came in from snowy,
Kentucky and it's great to be on you.

Speaker 2 (16:41):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (16:42):
Well, let me ask you, Andrew, I mean, how the
expenditures of the Biden administration. Things just exploded. What happened
to Andrew?

Speaker 5 (16:52):
So, yeah, it's important to go back very briefly to
the nineteen eighties the Reagan administration, when we faced a
huge problem with homeless veterans. Homeless veterans and other homeless
people in the United States were very big. Took Congress
past and President Reagan signed to build and created something
called the Emergency Food and Shelter Program ESSP and EFSP

(17:16):
again was to take care of homeless Americans. Fast forward
to the middle of twenty nineteen. You probably remember this.
Kids in cages became a hot issue because Donald Trump
ran out of money to move families and children out
of border patrol stations, and the Democrats basically let them
twist in the wind for about six weeks before they

(17:36):
gave him the money to get those kids out. And
when they did give them that money in June of
twenty nineteen, it came with a very big condition. Thirty
million dollars from that emergency food and shelter program had
to be given to states and localities that were resettling
migrants in their communities. Thirty million dollars. You take that

(17:58):
forward to the Biden administration twenty twenty three, that's grown
to seven hundred and eighty five million dollars in an
additional six hundred and forty point one million dollars in
twenty twenty four, So Kathy Hokeel didn't have to shield
anybody in New York. The Biden administration was given millions,
tens of millions of dollars to help resettle those folks

(18:19):
in hotels and you know, start them on a new
life and feed them and take care of them.

Speaker 2 (18:25):
So my question is where do you go from here?
This is all being revealed. We're seeing this in real
time New York. There were payments of fifty nine million
dollars for these hotels. Now the regime media, you know CNN,
they're saying well this isn't true. Well, we know it's true.
They just got the fifty nine million dollars back. What
part of that was it? Not luxury hotels and it
was Motel six. I mean what I guess my question is,

(18:48):
with all the money that we're discovering that's going, it's
moving around, how do how do we pull it back?
And is it going to work? Or are we going
to be able to see this change from what started
in twenty nineteen to what we now know today in
twenty twenty five.

Speaker 5 (19:02):
Well, I can guarantee you it's a great question.

Speaker 1 (19:04):
Greg.

Speaker 5 (19:05):
This reminds me of a of a technique that the
Clinton administration would use, denied, denied, deny, and then when
it comes out and you say, oh, that's old news.
And I've actually been writing about this, you know, ever
since twenty twenty two, but it was only really when
Hurricane Helene hit my home state of North Carolina, Western
North Carolina where I lived, that people started paying attention

(19:27):
to it because we knew that millions of dollars, you know,
weren't being spent in the Carolina. The millions of dollars
were being spent elsewhere, and so it became a thing.
And you know, then the other day on the tenth,
Elon Musk tweeted out about fifty nine million dollars being
clawed back from the state of New York. And it's
interesting because in a affid David that was filed with

(19:52):
the with the Cordon Rhode Island, the acting FEMA director
indicated that most of that money was going to one hotel,
which I've actually stayed at, the Roosevelt Hotel in New York. Yeah,
and that it had become a base of operations and
recruiting center for Trende Aragua. So again, when you file
something with the federal court, you better make sure it's true,

(20:14):
which you know gives again, I don't know that it's true,
but that is what the acting team of director said.
And so they are actively clawing back that money right
now from New York. Apparently the federal government has gotten
it back. But this is such a huge mess that
the Trump administration is it has inherited and is doing
ad mobly. But you know, it's it's a big hole

(20:36):
to dig yourself out of.

Speaker 3 (20:37):
Right.

Speaker 1 (20:37):
Well, it sounds like Andrew did the most of this
money from the Biden administration go to sanctuary cities or
sanctuary states. Is that there is that where they were
sending the money, Andrew.

Speaker 5 (20:48):
Till a lot of it did go to sanctuary cities,
but you know a lot of it also went to
border town, went to places like El Paso and things
like that, and you know two cities like Los Angeles.

Speaker 3 (20:59):
And New York.

Speaker 5 (21:00):
But yeah, it's again, it was wherever the migrants were going,
the money followed them. And you know, Rod, as you
can imagine, migrants are going to go to sanctuary communities
because they know that they're probably going to be safest there,
particularly if they are trend to a rod were members,
because eventually their past is going to catch up with them.
So yeah, I mean it's you know, the way that

(21:22):
the money has been spent. There really hasn't been a
lot of visibility in it. There's you know, been publications
on the theme the website about you know, big round numbers,
but not a whole lot of granularity. Now that we
have Elon Musk the Department of Government Efficiency, we actually
have people digging into it and the questions.

Speaker 1 (21:39):
Are just starting, Yeah, just starting. That's right. Great interview, Andrew,
appreciate your time. Enjoyed the article as well. I know
we'll be talking to you again down the road. Thanks
for joining us this afternoon.

Speaker 5 (21:49):
I look forward to it. Rod, thanks so much.

Speaker 1 (21:52):
All Right, that's good work. That's Andrew Arthur with the
Center for Immigration Studies. All right, more coming up on
the Rod and Greg joke.

Speaker 2 (21:58):
We are going to break barrier sound barriers that have
not been done before in radio truly. Well, we have
a guest at the top of the hour that has
not been on a radio interview. This is the first ever.
And this is a highly anonymous person, but this is
Data Republican. If you if you recognize the name, it's
to her. It's the X page and this is where

(22:20):
all the information that DOGE is uncovering. It is all
being put in a search engine. It's all being narrated
by Data Republican in digestible form for the American people,
and it is everybody's retweeting the work of Data Republican.
And we have the first radio interview ever.

Speaker 1 (22:37):
Yeah, and how I would define this, Greg? You know
Elon and is NeuroD Army have uncovered the information right, yes, Now,
Data Republican goes deeper, goes deeper down that rabbit hole
and really sees what's going on, where the money is going.
She's trying, and I think she's doing a terrific job
connecting the dots.

Speaker 2 (22:56):
That's right.

Speaker 1 (22:56):
Yeah, And that's what's really important.

Speaker 2 (22:58):
And not just through data sheets, but through flow charts
that you can see. And I'm a big visual person,
so the flow charts are what are most helpful for me.
So her boxes, if they're pink and red, that's mostly USAID,
that's federal money. And then they shoot it to another one,
it's red, shoot it to another one. It gets gray,
you know. Then they move and so it's how they

(23:19):
wash it and how they move it. And it's meant
on purpose to be vague. It's meant to move it
in mass. But the volume of money being moved nobody,
I'm telling you, And out of my wildest dreams what
I have imagined the kind of money they move on
a constant basis, and it's it's outside of Congress, it's
it's something else.

Speaker 1 (23:35):
Well, before we get to the top of the hour,
you've got to hear this, I mean the legacy media.
Greg is going crazy Anderson Cooper on CNN last night, Oh,
rather derogatory remark to Governor Johnson Unu, the former Chris
and Nunu, the former governor of New Hampshire. Is they
talked about all these cuts, and Anderson Cooper wanted to say, Okay,
where are the crust cuts? Listen to this debate.

Speaker 6 (23:57):
It's twenty three days in here, guys, three days you
were you were, you were talking about two point three
billion that was saved last year. These guys are saving
two point three billion a day.

Speaker 1 (24:05):
But well, you know, it's incredible, that's what they're saying.

Speaker 2 (24:09):
But where's the Again, you're waiting.

Speaker 6 (24:11):
You're not going to be satisfied till he shows up
with ten thousand pages.

Speaker 3 (24:14):
I know.

Speaker 2 (24:16):
He's giving very specific.

Speaker 7 (24:18):
Things he's giving, but he's not actually giving any evidence
of that.

Speaker 6 (24:21):
It's all going to come because what they also said
was if we have to go to Congress, we'll go
to Congress, right, but we'll show.

Speaker 7 (24:25):
Where some of the details that have come out, like
the you know, fifty nine million dollars spent on luxury hotels,
it's actually not the about.

Speaker 1 (24:34):
The FEMA money that was abused for migrants.

Speaker 6 (24:36):
That was FEMA money for migrants. That's okay.

Speaker 7 (24:39):
Now, no, I'm not saying it. So I'm not saying
it's okay. Don't put words.

Speaker 1 (24:42):
So would you stop that?

Speaker 2 (24:43):
Would you stop that process, don't be the portrayal.

Speaker 7 (24:47):
Don't be a what just not factually accurate. He's talking
about luxury hotels. There you can I'm not. I'm not
a look, I wasn't Hurtan sends you. I saw what
FEMA does.

Speaker 1 (24:58):
I believe it. I guess Oh Anderson said a naughty word, a.

Speaker 2 (25:03):
Bit of a swear, bear a bit of it, called
him a piece of mail, anatomy that we could.

Speaker 1 (25:09):
I will not say on this family van. We had
to believe that the family shows, family show. But just
another sign the legacy media Greg is losing their minds.

Speaker 2 (25:19):
Well you know when he does, when he starts calling
them names everything else. But here's the thing it it
actually was never a point of contention or you needed
evidence to show. First off, the judges stopped though, and
there's been New York Times story after story about the
government waste, but now there's no proof.

Speaker 1 (25:36):
Our exclusive interview with Jada Republican Stay with Us coming
up next Utah's Talk Radio one O five nine k
n R S.

Speaker 2 (25:46):
I'm rod Arkent, I'm citizen us. Folks, everybody get in
the van. We're ready to go. We are hyped on
this Wingman Wednesday edition. This has been you know, this
is I'm very very excited about this interview Roight.

Speaker 8 (25:58):
Now.

Speaker 1 (25:58):
Greg brought this to our two engine two three days
ago and he said, have you been following this? And
we started looking into this and we realized what data
Republican was doing and it is pretty amazing. Maybe you
can explain it to people, Greg, who should be looking
and following this now, they should be following our ex
page as well. But what data Republican is doing.

Speaker 2 (26:19):
So Data Republican, this person has taken the open sourced
information Doge's work as well as the nonprofit information that's
publicly available, and through coding and AI and through being
wicked smart, has actually created a search engine but also
has created a flow chart to show the flow of funds,

(26:39):
particularly with USAID, how that money is, where that money goes,
where it starts, and where it goes and what you
find is and what Data Republican has been able to
show is that it stops and a lot of locations
domestically with leftist Democrats, even the uniparty, there's Republicans involved too,
and they they make up fortune, they make they make

(27:02):
personal wealth over all of this, and then they shoot
this out domestically and around the world. Uh to I
think they're robber barons first and that they are politically
motivated second. But this thing is as a scam, it
is it is fraud and money laundering to a degree
that I don't know that the poll I certainly didn't
know the extent of it, and we wouldn't without the

(27:22):
good work of someone like Data Republican. Now, the reason
we keep saying data Republican is this person does not
want to be doctor and and and the people that
work for DOGE have been treated very poorly by the
regime media. This person would like to keep their privacy.
Uh So we went to great lengths. Also, this our
guest is hearing hearing impaired, So what you'll hear is

(27:42):
the interpreter of the sign language of the interpreter. The
interpreter's voice is what you hear. Even that's been altered
because again we're this is the first radio interview, folks.
This is this has been a on X. But her
post today after she did the interview with us, she
said the goal is to interview, is to take these interviews, uh,

(28:03):
and this knowledge beyond X and share it with a
wider public. And so this person's decided that they are
going to get outside of X the page and that
a Republican page and start to have these conversations and you'll,
I think you'll see it a little more. Bit. We're
the first, we're the first radio interview.

Speaker 1 (28:20):
Yeah. Now through the interpreter, you will hear her responses. Today.
We asked her a series of questions and we began
by first of all, asking her how in fact she
got into this and why she decided to really dig
deep into what the NERD Army and others have found
out about what's going on with a USAID. I asked
her why she decided to get into this.

Speaker 8 (28:40):
I was in DC and I met with some people,
nothing to do with the government, just I was in
DC and I met with some people and we were discussing,
you know, there needs to be something in the awards
that I don't know. One person said that the system,
you know, the US spends and the web, the US

(29:02):
Spending website is complicated and it's just impossible to find
any information that it's really hard to search it.

Speaker 3 (29:07):
So I thought, you know, we really need a tool
to do that.

Speaker 8 (29:10):
So what I can do is I can download the
award website itself in its entirety and make a tool
so that you can easily look up words in the
awards website. And then when I pulled it up, everyone
started searching for awards and I figured out that it
was crazy things in there. I was shocked by the

(29:32):
things I was reading, just crazy stuff and where the
awards were going. And it just became viral when I
made a comment on it.

Speaker 2 (29:39):
So, first off, this is taking your You have brought
this information to the fingertips of the public where we're
hearing from Doge and we're hearing about all of this.
You're making this available. We thank you for the hard
work and what you're doing. Let me ask you, and
this is a big question, it's probably too open ended,
but what have you what would you share with our listeners?
You have discovered that you really I want people to

(30:02):
feel aware of something that you've drilled down in and
something that you've discovered that we didn't know before Doge
and before you've made this publicly available.

Speaker 8 (30:10):
Yeah, wow, you know part of what I did was
I just did a graph of all the money flows
from the ENDO to NGO. That's all I wanted to do,
just follow the numbers, follow the money, but it was
so large and so complicated. Now there's around one hundred
thousand NGOs in my database and the connections are insane.

(30:32):
But the complication and connections between them are so hard
to analyze that there's probably around I think, like around
one billion possible connections, but now the real connection is
around two hundred and fifty million because so much money

(30:55):
is exchanging hands. And I think the reason why we
figured this out now is because of AI. AI is
an amazing tool for big database things like this, and
we can use against the government.

Speaker 1 (31:08):
Ran let me ask these connections. As you pointed out,
there are so many connections there with the NGOs. Is
this an attempt to hide how this money is going
from NGO to NGO? I mean, are they making it
so complicated? Is very hard for the average American to
follow any of this without your work, I mean, could

(31:29):
any anybody follow this well?

Speaker 8 (31:33):
I hate to give any opinions and I hate to
give any specific answers like yes or no, because that's
not my point. But what I want to say is
that the whole industry is worth around I think the
number is around three trillion dollars. Around half of that
is from the government, so the numbers don't lie. And

(31:56):
that's what I've seen. And almost all of them, and
most of them have no booths on the ground, so
they give the contract to the other person, and then
that person give contract to another person, and so on
and so on, so it gets really deep in the weave.

Speaker 3 (32:09):
I couldn't say.

Speaker 8 (32:10):
If it was purposeful, but it's awful to see that
it's actually happened and how the transfers have been going down,
and I hope that a lot of people can be
helped by tracking this.

Speaker 2 (32:22):
There was a post that you made that I thought
was incredibly insightful. You posted that you suspected that at
Elon Musk, prior to beginning this going to the Department
of Treasury in DOGE, he would have probably talked about
the importance of cutting the deficit. But you remark that
what you believe here or hearing from him now is

(32:43):
protecting democracy and it's a far greater mission than maybe
cutting the deficit. Share with our listeners, what does that mean?
Talk about the uniparty, Where this money goes, who pockets it?
How is democracy or how does democracy need to be
protected by someone like Elon Musk who knows how to
look at the numbers and dig into where money is

(33:05):
spent and how it's spent.

Speaker 8 (33:06):
Yes, yes, absolutely So There's another person named my Bens
who I've talked to, and I promise he is the expert.
You know, just watch his stuff. He has many, many things,
and he pays attention and analyzes many things as well.
And I figured out independently that around eight core. There's

(33:27):
about eight core NGOs. Most of them were formed in
the Cold War times, as you could probably understand, which
is the point of that is to stop the thread
of communism around the world, which is why many of
these ENGOs were formed during the Cold War. But when
communism was finished back in the day, for some reason,
these NGOs they were not resolved, and somehow money was

(33:51):
still moving and they didn't stop growing. They just kept
growing and growing and growing and influencing the world even
when there was nothing technically we were suposed to be influencing. Now, many,
many politicians from both parties joined these NGOs, and it's
crazy how much money they've been receiving. Like there's a

(34:12):
Republican NGO called the International Republican Institute, and then there's
a Democratic NGO called the National Democratic Institute, and they're important.
I've set this point up because both of these parties
have an agreement to stop communism together and they'll get
an equal chair in their influence over the world, so

(34:35):
that we can influence both ways for the Democrats and
the Republicans and act the controlling opposition is real.

Speaker 3 (34:40):
You can see that.

Speaker 2 (34:42):
There's no Cold War. So what are they are?

Speaker 3 (34:46):
Exactly?

Speaker 8 (34:47):
That is exactly my point. What are we fighting now?
Since communism? They they just keep growing and growing and
growing anyway, when the reason they were growing in the
first place is by communism, And now we have nothing
to fight.

Speaker 3 (34:58):
And somehow he noticed and.

Speaker 8 (35:01):
All of their purpose is for what to protect democracy?
But I believe that they became a democracy themselves, or.

Speaker 2 (35:10):
A bureaucracy or a cleptocracy.

Speaker 8 (35:14):
Yes, exactly. And when you think of that, think about
those eight core NGOs that I was talking about earlier.
They are very powerful inngos with powerful politicians who lead them,
like for example, Lindsay Braham and Donna Braven and many

(35:34):
many other names that you would recognize. So all of
these NGOs have really powerful people in power that have
a lot of money.

Speaker 1 (35:42):
And there has been no oversight whatsoever over these eight
primary NGOs that you've been looking at. Nobody has ever
looked at exactly what they're doing until now. Is that
fair to say that's correct?

Speaker 8 (35:56):
Nope, they have not looked because they've just become a
government themselves, and governments are supposed to have oversight, and
they do not. But it's a very complicated and very
interesting and it's a very deep complic of interest as well.

Speaker 2 (36:08):
So I have a question that I mentioned to someone.
By the way, there are so many people that I
know that even I'm a recovering public servant, but people
within state government who are auditors and people that work
on their budgets and states that would love to work
with someone that's really bringing things to light the way
you are. The question I was asked was, can you

(36:28):
give us a cheat code? There's so much information out there.
What should people be looking for on your site, Data Republican?
What should they look for to really open their eyes
about what's going on around them.

Speaker 8 (36:42):
Yeah, that's a good question, because again, it's so complicated.
I believe that we would never even know this was
a problem if we didn't have the AI to help
us make these connections. So what I'm actually doing today
is I'm developing an inpographic of those eight NGOs and
so that we can understand how they influence the world
and how they did so that would be the place

(37:03):
to start looking.

Speaker 1 (37:04):
Got it the first exclusive radio interview with the person
behind Data Republican on X. Follow it. Follow her because
let me tell you what, she has absolutely amazing information
about what's going on in the federal government.

Speaker 2 (37:17):
So if you listen to that one point five trillion
dollars in federal money of the three trillion running around
out there, that she's spend tracking one point five trillion dollars,
and really eight government funded NGOs are like the mother,
the genesis, the mothership of this. And she's going to
put this on her at Data Republican on X. But

(37:40):
I appreciate that she there was a lot of hesitancy
to get off of X and really maybe speak directly,
and so I really want to thank her for coming
forward and doing this because it is a service to
the American people to know that since the Cold War,
and this is actually new information from our interview. These
were that up to fight communism, and then when the communism,

(38:03):
when the wall fell and the communists over, they just
kept spending. They just kept sending the money. And then
they're looking around going, whoa, we were still getting well,
I think we need more. I think we should get
more more more, And it just kept growing and growing.
And what it is now is again, this is the
uniparty we've always we didn't I didn't understand why there
was a uniparty. I couldn't understand why we couldn't we

(38:25):
have party platforms. Why is why can't we tell the
difference between any of them in there? This is it.
It's the money they're they're robber barons first, plundering the
pledge public treasury, and they are politically motivated far second,
distant second is what I say.

Speaker 1 (38:41):
Yeah, well, and as she pointed out, there's a democratic
NGO and a Republican NGO. They worked together. It is amazing, Greg,
and nobody can As you mentioned, these NGOs were set
up years ago to fight communism. Communism doesn't exist anymore.
Did anybody say, uh, we don't need need you anymore?

Speaker 2 (39:01):
And Congress knows nothing about this. This is all outside
of Congress's purview or supposed to be. I mean, that's
what the that's the that's the line, that's what we're told.

Speaker 1 (39:09):
All Right, We've got more to talk and say about
this coming up on the Rotting Greg Show Wingman Wednesday
edition right here on Utah's Talk Radio one oh five
nine k NRS.

Speaker 2 (39:18):
You are the first radio program to interview Data Republican
at Data Republican X, that is the X handle. Data
Republican has taken the work of DOGE taking the taking
this USAID and and through coding and AI has really
made more has created more transparency and shown us UH

(39:39):
put at our fingertips away to research how this federal
money one point five trillion federal dollars flowing to leftist organizations,
to uniparty organizations. You'll have to listen to the interview
if you missed it, because and we're gonna we might
replay it later, maybe the third hour.

Speaker 1 (39:56):
In the third hour of the show tonight, and e
Ray right now is making an effort to get it
up on our podcast. That's our website. It takes a
little bit of time to go through all the channels
he has to, but he's working to get that up.
If you didn't hear it today, fascinating the information.

Speaker 2 (40:10):
Well, as much as I follow the page, there was
information in this interview that I was not aware, especially
like the origins, like you start with the Cold War
and then the Cold War ends and they just keep going.

Speaker 1 (40:20):
And that's the first radio interview she did radio social
media interview earlier today.

Speaker 2 (40:27):
But she shall be on Blaze tomorrow.

Speaker 1 (40:28):
She'll be on Blaze tomorrow with Steve Deets by the way.
So but it was great, interesting interview and we'll play
that back a little bit later on and again we'll
have it up on our website as well. All Right,
more coming up on the Rod and Greg Show and
Utah's Talk Radio one oh five nine K and r
ass lazy and gentlemen, like how we played played played
that a little bit.

Speaker 2 (40:48):
The eagle has landed.

Speaker 1 (40:49):
Well, it's flying down a landing, baby, it's flying.

Speaker 2 (40:53):
We have we have hit the K status on the followers.
Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen. We have now
have what well over one thousand followers.

Speaker 1 (41:02):
Well, well is kind of a stretch fourteen fourteen.

Speaker 2 (41:05):
Yes, but it's still it's a there's a K I'm
wanting to be I wanted to see that K for
a long time.

Speaker 1 (41:11):
We should mention that data Republican mom mom mom first
of all posted that she she really, you know, was
very happy with their daughter's performance.

Speaker 2 (41:20):
Put a shout out to kid and then and then
follow the show. She's now follower of the show too,
which we appreciate that a Republican mom kid's got a
big brain. I'm telling you, she is saying she is
a patriot hero and saving this this country in real time,
and it's like, I just love it. I just love
how everyday people with all their skills and talents and

(41:41):
they're just being they're finding a place to help bring
things that were never meant to be known and we're
finding it out. And it's how this the Republic's going
to get saved.

Speaker 1 (41:50):
Rad I'm telling you, there is really greg a revolution
taking place, and it is the everyday Americans, yes, who
are now demanding finally and saying to Washington and the bureaucrats,
what do you guys been up to? And we what
we're finding, we don't like it at all.

Speaker 2 (42:08):
There has been generations of a fog of war. We
just couldn't see it. We couldn't. I mean, they just
they would just they would just pound us with just
details and division and everything. And now with this, with
this president and with who he's putting in there to
really give us the details and make it publicly sourced
and let people look, I just think we're in a
we're in such an incredible time of this country's history.

Speaker 1 (42:30):
Well, so many people over the years, great, how mean,
how many Republican politicians over the years said we need
to cut federal space. Oh, it's just it's been a
broken record for how long it forever? Yeah, I mean
I've never heard anyone long saying I'm in more flexible government,
lower government spending. I mean, they've they've been talking about
this forever.

Speaker 2 (42:50):
I think it was nineteen ninety two when Bob Bennett
was running for Senate he said, why don't we put
the uh, your tax return should be the size of
a postcard. Yeah, nineteen ninety two.

Speaker 1 (42:59):
Yeah, Okay, it didn't become a postcard.

Speaker 2 (43:02):
And they and then they've been using these tax shelters
in these non I mean, it's just been an abuse
of the public treasury. Outside of Congress outside of the
of our workings of government, our separation of powers, the
power of the person Congress is supposed to have. This
stuff's been on autopilot and growing. The two things I
learned from that interview rod One, the origins of all

(43:24):
of this nonsense with USA. I D began in the
Cold War, okay, and it has to fight, which is
that was actually a legit deal, right. But there was
a Republican entity and a Democrat entity, and then another
entity that was not I wasn't supposed to be parison.
But you had the Democrats in on fighting communism, you
had the Republicans in on fighting communism. Then you had

(43:44):
this third party and these groups these like motherships. When
communism ended, when the wall fell, they kept going and
they kept collecting the money, and they kept getting they
kept growing to the point where the second thing I've
learned in that interview that I didn't know one point
five trillion dollars in federal money. Now, if we're running
a two trillion dollar deficit a year, he's going to

(44:07):
find He's he's finding billions a day. Elon Trump, Doge,
our hero data Republican, They're they're finding that what what Trump,
what Biden said, they found in a term, they're finding
in a day in terms of waste, fraud, and abuse
they're going. Elon Musk said over the weekend that he

(44:29):
is one hundred one certain that the graft that's going
on with this money is worse than any financial crime
ever uncovered in American history. You know what I think
has happened, Bernie made off nothing small ball?

Speaker 1 (44:42):
You know what I think has happened, Greg, For you know,
Donald Trump has talked about this since he came down
the escalator in twenty fifteen, clearing up the swamp, going
after the swamp. I don't know if if a lot
of Americans really understood what he meant, Greg, would you
agree or disagree with it? They knew the government has
been Yeah, there's a lot of but they never kind
of Okay, what do you mean President, what do you

(45:04):
mean by this? Now? We know it means they are
spending our tax dollars without any accountability and using it
to further their political agenda, not to put America first,
but to put their own political agendas first. And we had,
as you just mentioned, eight NGOs that were set up
years ago to fight communism communism doesn't exist anymore, so

(45:27):
why did they even exist? And how are they getting money?
And how are they using that money? And it's finally being.

Speaker 2 (45:32):
Uncovered finally and the amounts and in a nick of time,
I say, but as having been a lawmaker and having
been Speaker of the House where we took budgets. So
because states don't print money, they could never do what's
going on here where you print it and just keep
it and everything they're doing. But all I understood about
government and budgets was taxpayers pay money, and we would

(45:52):
have a physical legislative fiscal analyst tell us, this is
how much money have been collected. Okay, here are the outlays.
This is what we have by way of programs or
whatever we're spending it on, and you would just see
if you I mean, there was just math to what
we did. I could never get my head and still
can't get my head around any math in the federal
government and how it spends money. There is just no

(46:14):
math to it. The way you see. States have to
balance budgets because they don't print money. They have to,
they cannot. They have to take whatever they're collecting in
and they can borrow and bond. But day, whatever they're
getting in they have to be able to pay for.
And it's whether it's a blue or red state, you
have to do it. Some do it responsibly, some don't.
But it's still the same math. In the federal government,

(46:34):
they're working on a whole different level. And what we're
finding out here, this is how you get thirty trillion,
thirty six trillion in debt. Disgustingly, is this little scam here.
This is just a part of it. And I think
in the area, I think we're going to find that
there's so much fraud, waste, and abuse in different departments
of the federal government. But this being able to track
it and letting the people be involved, this is how

(46:56):
you're going to keep us on top of this. And
it needs the political will to continue.

Speaker 1 (47:00):
Yeah. Doge, by the way, story today in the Epic Times,
Doge has made over three point four billion dollars in
cuts already, and you know what that money is basically
do what they're doing, basically, Greg right now, they're cutting contracts.
There are all these kinds of contracts that the federal
government has with various groups and organizations, and they're saying

(47:21):
no more and oh, by the way, President Trump and
Elon Musk I heard this on Fox a while ago.
We'll be holding a meeting a conference tomorrow and they
will list all the places that your money has been going.
That's going to be interesting to watch. All right, We've
got a lot more to say on this. By the way,
the interview is now up on our EX page as well.

Speaker 2 (47:41):
That's right. Oh, it's up on the X page, up
on the excellent, well, excellent, excellent, excellent. I think this
is it's the first radio interview and this data Republican
is A is A is getting national attention. Elon Musk
retweets the work all the time, so is Charlie Kirk.
Everyone does, everyone does. It's it's it's the source in

(48:02):
this country right now for for more detailed information. And
she told us on the program she's got she's working
on a charge chart where she's going to try and
explain how some of this works because there's so much
information to try and absorb.

Speaker 1 (48:16):
All right, more coming up on The Wingman Wednesday. Addition
of the Rod arc Kiad and Greg Hughes show, Rodding
Greg on Talk Radio one oh five nine k NRS.

Speaker 2 (48:24):
Pressure the Rotting Greg Show. And I'll tell you who's
feeling a lot of pressure call her. A listener called
in and said, who's more nervous. The people on the
Epstein list are the Republicans on the Doge list, because
I'm going to tell you that UNI party, We're gonna
we're gonna learn all about why it's so una that
party and not Republican or Democrat.

Speaker 1 (48:46):
And does Lindsey Graham think the American people are stupid?

Speaker 8 (48:48):
No?

Speaker 2 (48:48):
I Hey, shout out to Lindsay Graham. He did it
the right way. He's got political chops. He's like, you know,
that's crazy what they're doing. He's all over this thing, right,
he's inside there, he's getting but he's like, oh he's
he's doing one of those high he's been pushes like
arms right, he's getting away from it. He's saying, hey,
I don't know what those guys are doing. That sounds
crazy to me. I'm I'm with Dogan with Trump Doge.
But the Democrats are too, They're just like, no, we're

(49:09):
we We're with the graft in the and the waist
and fraud and abuse. That's where we are. I mean,
at least Lindsey Graham knows how to try and hide.
He can't hide. Last is trying. He's putting. Democrats aren't
trying to hide. They're trying to say. They're doubling down,
tripling down. They're in a hole. They're digging. I can't
think of anything.

Speaker 1 (49:26):
All right, Well, I met ascribe it. I mention this
before the break, Greg over thirty three point four billion
dollars and cut so far. Here's where some of them
come from. You're ready for this? Yes, eight hundred and
eighty one million dollars. They terminated eighty nine Department of
Education contracts. Okay, fifteen million dollars canceled three Department of

(49:49):
Education DEI matching grams. Twenty six million dollars. Canceled twenty
consulting contracts for strategicmmunication and executive coaching. We could teach
them about strategic communication, couldn't we.

Speaker 2 (50:05):
Yeah, quit quit defending fraud.

Speaker 1 (50:08):
Yeah, there you go. Quit defending graft. One hundred one
million dollars canceled twenty nine Diversity Equity and Inclusion contracts.
One hundred eighty two million dollars canceled Health and Human
Services administrative expensive contracts one hundred sixty five million dollars

(50:29):
canceled thirty six contracts with various agencies. Seven hundred eighty
four million dollars contra canceled contracts to build a new
embassy in South Sudan. Can we just find a building
to rent it? We have to build a new one.
This is where they're going votes, This is what you wanted,

(50:50):
and this is what Doge is coming on.

Speaker 2 (50:52):
I'm going to tell you that what we if there's
one point five trillion dollars of federal money run around
out there. Everything you're naming, it's what it's the crumbs
are breaking off. There was a on the five. I
don't think it was the five. I just saw a
quote where the Democrat apologists saying, you know, you're saying,
it's like forty billion, that's a Trump change. That's nothing. Yeah,
that's nothing, right, it's nothing. Sure. The problem is what

(51:13):
do you see them spending it on in comparison to
one point five trillion. You're right, it's nothing because they're
pocketing this stuff. They're making this money. This is generational wealth.
That's why I think that it's a money scam. First,
and a distant second is actually the political agenda, which
is which I wouldn't have said a month ago.

Speaker 1 (51:31):
And I think, what is so dangerous right now? You
talk about a constitutional crisis? Greg These Democrats who are
out there judge shopping, looking for liberal judges who will
express their liberal opinion in their court rulings to do
whatever they can to stop Donald Trump. A judge already
today said, you know that that extended offer, early out

(51:51):
offer that he has made, it can go forward.

Speaker 2 (51:53):
Now they finally get a judge that's honest.

Speaker 1 (51:56):
Well, the unions who protested against it filed a lawsuit
against it. The judge ruled today didn't rule on the
buyout program, but he basically said, you unions, you have
no legal standing in this, so it can go forward.

Speaker 3 (52:09):
Here you go.

Speaker 5 (52:09):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (52:10):
And by the way, one of the judges that ruled
against the president, saying he wasn't a president and didn't
have the right and was freezing up what he's trying
to do. His wife works for usaid, you know you
might have wanted that might be one of those conflicts
you might want to mention it just slightly.

Speaker 1 (52:23):
Just slightly, all right, when we come back, the state
is telling Salt Lake City you a better get going.
We'll explain what that's all about when we come back
on the Rotten Great Show on this Wednesday afternoon as
you work your way home. We've had a great show today.
By the way, if you missed our interview with Data Republican,
we are going to replay it at the bottom of

(52:44):
this hour. So if you've missed out on him, and
it's also up on our ex page, just follow us
at at Rodd and Gregg Show and also on our
podcast at caanarrest dot com. So many ways to get
that and a lot of interest in what she had
to say.

Speaker 2 (52:58):
It is generating so much better. It's it's the first
radio interview that that Republican has done. It's been a
source of an original source of information on on what
DOGE is uncovering and how that money is flowing. This
is the first interview, radio interview that that Republican has done.
And I think it's gonna be on Blazed tomorrow. But
Steve d Steve D s But you know, we got

(53:20):
we got sharp, we got fighter pilots. Okay, we got
them everywhere Rod And it's the session right now, and
our next guest is one of these top guns pilot. Yeah,
he's one of ours out there.

Speaker 1 (53:30):
Handle is I mean, I'm Maverick Goose, You're Goose. Well,
I'll find out what Casey's is. Maybe he's got to.

Speaker 2 (53:36):
Handle's represent of Casey Snyder is joining us on the program.
He is the Assistant Whip and House Leadership in the
Utah House of Representatives. Representative Welcome to Wingman Wednesday on
the Rodd and Greg Show.

Speaker 9 (53:49):
Hey guys, thanks for having me. I have no idea
what you're talking about in terms of calling me a
fighter pilot. I'm a little nervous about what I find
out for.

Speaker 2 (53:56):
It's look, you you've seen top Gun in the movie Maverick, Right,
you've seen that?

Speaker 5 (54:01):
Sure who has?

Speaker 9 (54:01):
If you're not, if you're American, you haven't seen that,
you're actually considered.

Speaker 2 (54:05):
Spot Well, you're one of them. You're on the You're
one of You're the You're one of the fire pilots
on the hill. That's what you are.

Speaker 9 (54:13):
Wednesday, if I hit a jet to am I the
one that dies?

Speaker 2 (54:19):
Now I'm curious A good question?

Speaker 1 (54:22):
He does? He does? All right, Casey? We saw today
the Salt Lake City Police Chief Mike Brown has stepped out.
I wonder why you've got a bill which is pressuring
Salt Lake City to work and partner up with the
state on the issue of homelessness and drug policing. What
is this all about, Casey?

Speaker 9 (54:40):
Yeah, you know, I you know, I saw that announcement
same as you guys. I was surprised by it. You know,
my my bill would have worked and whether or not
Chief Brown was still in place, So I, you know,
I hope him. I wish him well in retirement. And
you know, my my bill is really just trying to
bring accountability some of what's going on in Salt Lake City,

(55:03):
and I wish Chief Brown well and hopefully that hopefully
through my bill, we can work with the next police
chief to really get some things moving in Salt Lake
City in the right direction.

Speaker 2 (55:12):
So it's a tough road to ho I as a
recovering public servant, I can tell you that that was
a tough, particularly tough issue, and there needs to be
a lot of help in the stage role can be
a strong leadership role, representative. What do you foresee as
the stage role?

Speaker 8 (55:27):
Really?

Speaker 2 (55:27):
And I think it's appropriate to hold Salt Lake City's
feet to the fire where we cannot let lawlessness grow,
we cannot let people continue to be preyed upon what
is the expectation from your bill and really from the
state on what they want to see from Salt Lake
City in this agreement. In this bill.

Speaker 9 (55:43):
You know, there's no more fundamental power for a municipality
than public safety, and at the fundamental level, this is
a local issue.

Speaker 3 (55:54):
So what my.

Speaker 9 (55:54):
Bill is contemplating doing is looking at some of the
things that the city is proposing and then coming up
with an agreement with state resources, primarily DPS, hopefully and
providing a way for them to work jointly with us
to come up to the best outcomes. I consider this,
hopefully a firm but fair approach to some of the

(56:14):
things that are going on. In an ideal world. The
good folks at DPS will act as advisors, the city
will move forward, and we'll make progress on some of
these really perennial issues, you know. But like any good contract,
it has some you know, I guess you could call
them reversionary clauses in there. And if we're not able

(56:35):
to fix this, if the city balks at some of
the recommendations, then they are on the hook financially in
terms of compensating the state for stepping in. This is
not a state issue, this is a local issue. I
am grateful for the stride that Mayor Mendon Hall has
taken on this issue, and I hope we can all
work collaboratively together move forward.

Speaker 1 (56:54):
Presendive Snyder, Comrade Menden Hall as I like to call her,
has already said, we don't need legislation to do this,
but you obviously feel it's necessary.

Speaker 9 (57:02):
Why, you know, I you have to have if you're
going to have a tractual relationship being spelled out. That
just keeps everybody honest, It keeps everything fair, you know.
You know, you've got the former Speaker of the House
here on this very wonderful show, and he tried to

(57:25):
fix this problem, you know, and he got asbout as
close as anybody's ever gotten. And unfortunately there it we're
back kind of almost to where we started. You know,
we've learned some lessons and and I don't want to
put us in that position again. I think we're we're
as committed now as Speaker Hughes was then, and hopefully
we've learned from those lessons. And the biggest lesson that

(57:48):
we've learned is this is in a state issue. It's
the stake can help, but ultimately the city needs to
be accountable. We cannot fix the problem for them. We
can help them resolve the problem, but we're not going
to solve it for them. It's not our problem.

Speaker 2 (58:00):
It's well said in my heart's It has been hard
to watch how much work we had in the progress.
I believe that was made, but it could not be
sustained as you did not see the city live up
to the commitments that were made back then. So I
think you're wise representative in how you're laying this out
and as a contract as you've put it, What is
a timeframe for something like this? I mean, I would

(58:20):
tell you that my opinion of the Salt Lake City
is it's one of the unique cities where you will
see urban renewal and urban decay on the same city block.
Show me in America where you're going to see that,
and I think you see that in Salt Lake City,
where you see homelessness and urban decay while construction's happening
right next to it. I mean, so, what's the timeline
for your bill and how that partnership would work.

Speaker 9 (58:44):
You know, there's a series of triggers in this the
first one being we got to come to an agreement
and move forward by July. If that's not meant, then
that's really the first instance where the state will take
a more proactive role and then build a city through
some of their homelessness mitigation funds for any services rendered.
If that falls apart and we go through the summer
and still haven't made progress, then there will be some

(59:07):
clawbacks of some of their critical road funding so that
we can have a more expansive presence in the city
but use city resources to pay for it. But I
will say I hope we never get to that point.
I don't think it's in anybody's best interest to have
a confrontational relationship. So what I'm hoping is the city
and the state can work very closely together to come

(59:30):
up with a series of principles, outcomes, metrics by which
to judge all of this, and we can move forward
very collaboratively. That is my hope. But like I say,
we're going to make sure that we keep everybody honest
in this agreement when the legislature's over. And that's why
a law is so critical.

Speaker 1 (59:46):
Representative Seider, it sounds like you're holding funding kind of
a little bit, or you're maybe willing to withhold some
funding on that. Why do you think that will work?
Do you think that will be a wake up call
to the city in that regard?

Speaker 9 (59:59):
Well, and again that's the clause of last resort. I
think we just having this conversation has spurred a lot
of changes. The President and the speaker, you know, wrote
a letter the middle of December, which the city has
responded to with a series of ideas. What I'm hoping
is that we will put those ideas and maybe a
few more into practice in an agreement we're going to

(01:00:21):
move forward. If things break down, that's when the funding
triggers and we're going to solve this problem. This is
you know, this is Salt Lake City's problem. Yes, but
I live in Cash County and Salt Lake City is
my capital city, and everybody that comes to Cash County
from somewhere else lands in Salt Lake City. I want
Salt Lake City to be successful. I want it to

(01:00:42):
be clean and safe, the same as any resident here
because it reflects on all of us. So, you know,
money is just a little bit of the stick, but
really collaborations meant to be the carrot. And I hope
we stay with carrots before we get two sticks.

Speaker 2 (01:00:56):
Well, well said, Well, thank you for your time, thank
you for your hard work, and and wish you luck.
I think it's honestly, Salt Lake City is predominantly Democrat
run city. I see them circle a lot of issues.
Action is hard, and so I commend you for your
leadership and good luck with that partnership. We need it.
We need leadership right now. Especially thank you Representative Casey Side.

Speaker 9 (01:01:18):
I appreciate it, all right.

Speaker 1 (01:01:19):
That's like Representative Casey Snyder talking about this bill would
would pressure the city, and they need to be pressured.
I think Greg you would agree on that. You've been there,
You've been in that fight for a long long time
to work with the state and do something about homelessness
and drug policing here in the city. And Mike Brown
today stepping down as his police chief.

Speaker 2 (01:01:37):
I'll tell share of that. Do we have to go
to break sure? No, Okay, I'll just share a personal
story I was, I was Speaker of the House. I
think this was back in the summer of seventeen over
the fourth of July. All day, there were two homicides
in in that Rio Grand area and I'd had it,
and we'd been trying to work for over a year
on trying to get something done. And these homicides were
just barbaric with a with a bolt like a rock

(01:01:58):
and you know, pummeling someone and it was drug cartels
and it was all drug related and criminal related. And
so I had an interview and I said, call the
National Guard. I'm telling you, I was Speaker of the
House at the time. I said to the governor, call
the National Guard, because I don't know what you have
to see out here where you wouldn't where you would
call them, versus what we're seeing now with these homicides.

(01:02:19):
I had the Chief of police, who's just retired today
picked me up. I was at my office and said,
I think you've overstated this. I don't think it's as
bad as you think. And you wanted to drive me
around the city to show me how much improvement there
has been. And I'm not kidding you. It did not
look improved at all. Broken bike parts everywhere, they were tense,
they were just there was debris everywhere. And I said

(01:02:41):
to the chief, and if you were sitting next to me,
I would recall the same story. I said, Chief, I
think you've been at it too long. I don't know
what we're supposed to be looking at right now, but
I don't see I don't see this as any kind
of solution. This isn't I don't know what it is.
So I just think. And that was back in seventeen.
Here we are in twenty twenty five. So draw your
own conclusion.

Speaker 1 (01:03:00):
Yeah, we'll see, all right, Mary. Coming up on the
Wigman Wednesday edition of The Rotten Gregg Show on Talk
Radio one five nine KNRS.

Speaker 2 (01:03:08):
I had a great interview last hour with Data Republican,
a anonymous but very prolific X post or page and
first time deciding to go out beyond the x sphere,
and this was the first radio interview, going to do
more interviews and get the message out more broadly about

(01:03:32):
the waste the federal money that has been absolutely embezzled, laundered,
whatever word you want to use. It didn't go through Congress,
and it's not legitimate. And the work that Data Republican's
doing is amazing. So it was an important interview. I
learned a lot in that interview, and we have that
posted on our podcast, on our iHeartMedia app, We've posted

(01:03:53):
it on our X page, and I think we're going
to do a replay now.

Speaker 1 (01:03:56):
We're going to play it back at about six thirty five,
Okay tonight for those of you who didn't hear it,
because she really does give some insight as to the
core of what has been going on here, and it's
pretty amazing when it comes to NGOs.

Speaker 2 (01:04:08):
It really is. And again, one point five trillion federal
dollars combined with the other contributions that nonprofits or NGOs
have that is one point five trillion is a lot.
And I'm going to tell you that I think what's
been uncovered is is really it's robber barons. They're keeping
most of it and then they send it out to

(01:04:29):
ridiculous causes.

Speaker 1 (01:04:30):
Secondary I want to take you back to yesterday. Elon
Musk and his three year old son, who was really
kind of an ordaining little guy, was at that news
conference yesterday with President Trump. President Trump has it been
once or at least twice a day where he's meeting
with the press and the news media and answering their questions.
The media has never seen anything like this, even though

(01:04:52):
with Obama you didn't get you didn't get this, but
Donald Trump very comfortable, very comfortable I think, in his
own skin and his own own opinions and willing to
share those with the American people. Well, during that brief
news conference whatever you want to call it, yesterday, Elon
Musk was there, talked about what Doge's doing, and he
made a real interesting comment about democracy and bureaucracy.

Speaker 10 (01:05:15):
If there's not a good feedback loop from the people
to the government, and if you have rule of the bureaucrat,
if the bureaucracy is in charge, and then what meaning
does democracy actually have If the people cannot vote and
have they will be decided by their elected representatives in
the form of the President and the Senate in the House,

(01:05:38):
then we don't live in a democracy if we live
in a bureaucracy. So it's incredibly important that we close
that feedback WEP, we fix that feedback loop, and that
the public, the public's elected representatives, the President of the
House and the Senate, decide what happens as opposed to
a large unelected bureaucracy.

Speaker 1 (01:05:57):
Yeah, that's the problem, a large and very low large
and unelected bureaucracy. And that's what has been running this
country for far too long and that's what Donald Trump
pledged to the American voters. He would do everything he
could to stop it and defund it. And that's what's
taking place right now.

Speaker 2 (01:06:13):
And I and I and again, I think that there's
such a specificity to this, and this is so important
because I think that we talked about this after he
got elected, and you wondered out loud, and we both
wondered out loud. Can will the people stay with the details.
Will they stay with it when when the news cycles
come and go, will he still have that mandate or
will we move on or will we be led to

(01:06:34):
some other story or will we be distracted. The way
this this abuse is being uncovered, I think involves the
American people where they can access see it themselves. And
I think this is how this public mandate stays strong,
because it needs to stay strong going into the midterms
and throughout President Trump's four years.

Speaker 1 (01:06:53):
Well, I think I think the Democrats are helping out out.
There is screeching and constitutional crisis, constitutional crime.

Speaker 2 (01:07:00):
What do we go buring if the kleptocracy and the
bureaucrats can't run America, we have a constitutional crisis. I mean,
don't see that in the Constitution. I think you're well,
you think is a crisis. Is actually the rest of
us in the American people, in taxpayers saying yeah, we
don't want my our money stolen that way, we don't
want it wasted that way or spent that way.

Speaker 1 (01:07:19):
And they're singing at the top of their lung right
now about a constitutional crisis. On CNN, MSNB rarely singing yeah, yeah,
they are.

Speaker 8 (01:07:28):
Well.

Speaker 1 (01:07:28):
The MSNBC legal analyst, his name is Danny, I think
so all Is appeared on the Morning Joe Show Toyes
with Menka Brazinski, right, and she's sitting there, it's a
constitutional crisis. What are we going to do? Danny? Well,
Danny kind of brought her back down to earth.

Speaker 11 (01:07:46):
I think we need to be careful with the term
constitutional crisis because as I define it, that would be
a situation where the Constitution doesn't have an answer and
there is a pressing conflict. The flurry of executive orders,
the chaos that I think doesn't get us to crisis.

Speaker 3 (01:08:02):
Yet it is.

Speaker 11 (01:08:04):
Irritating for the courts, It is challenging. It could lead
to a serious problem if, as you said, they become
too congested with dealing with these orders, the crisis occurs,
and we've already talked about it at the moment when
there is a court order and the president or the
administration refuses to follow it because historically we don't really

(01:08:25):
have a clear answer for what to do in that situation.

Speaker 1 (01:08:28):
So is the crisis, Greg, I'm trying to figure out
what he said. Is the crisis the result of everything
that Donald Trump is doing so fast and so quickly,
And that's why the demos are going, you can't do
it that fast. It's a constitutional crisis? Or is there
a real crisis here? Because Joe Biden even ignored what
the Supreme Court told them to do when it came
to student loan forgiveness. Yet I don't recall a Democrat saying,

(01:08:51):
Joe Biden, you're creating a constitutional crisis.

Speaker 2 (01:08:54):
Well, he failed to secure the border, which is his duties.
That's my orchis was impeached in the House. The Senate
refused it refused to take it up. Only someone that
was dead. Did the Sendate ever, not take up articles
of impeachment? That not following that? In the con I mean,
I think that's another crisis, But no, no, none of
those are rod They What's what is a crisis to

(01:09:18):
them is that they're tried and true model of trying
to narrate and destroy Trump or anyone against their global
view is to have the regime media put in the
front page and they comment on it, and there's a
cycle that they go through. He is moving so fast
they don't have time to let their cycle go through.
They can't print it and then comment on it and

(01:09:39):
then have to do it. They can't get the talking
points out fast enough. So it's happening at such a
rapid pace. They are left unable to destroy what it
is that someone that doesn't agree with them would otherwise do.
That's their crisis. That is not my crisis, institutional That's
that's my happy place. This is where I love to
be is right here, all right.

Speaker 1 (01:09:59):
More coming up on the in Greg Show in Utah's
Talk Radio one oh five nine k n RS.

Speaker 2 (01:10:04):
It's a banner day here at wing Man Wednesday is
Rot and Gregg Show. You know, we are living and
we've talked about this. We're living through an incredible time
and it is a time where when Donald Trump's been elected,
and within weeks of being elected, he is engaged elon
Musk and DOGE and finding the you know, the Department
of Government efficiency and they are just really pulling back
the curtain. They're doing a lot of good work exposing

(01:10:25):
a lot of graft, waste, fraud abuse. They're making a
lot of this. They're making their information public. It's public access.
There is so is someone named data Republican. It's a
next page. Has used AI and coding and has been
able to with with you know, e I N numbers
and NGO information that's publicly available. Has been able to

(01:10:46):
take the information that is being made available and exposed
by DOGE and has made it available to every day
people's fingertips through her site. And she has a search
engine where you can look up keywords. She's also created
flow charts so you can see how this money is
ill gotten gain and how it flows. But she's been
very anonymous in terms of she doesn't want to be docks.

(01:11:08):
I mean, you look at the young people that work
for Elon. They've been mistreated by the regime media. So
privacy is a concern for Data Republican. Today was her
first radio interview. She has hundreds of thousands of followers
on x Elon Musk retweets her things, Charlie Kirk, you
name it, anyone that's a thought leader on social media
has been reposting her work. And it is the authority

(01:11:32):
really that goes deeper than what Doge has gone on.
And so today she came on our program. Yeah, and
we are you need to mention she's hearing impaired. Yes,
So we spoke to her through an interpreter, and that's
how we're able to get her answer. The interpreter through silanguage.
I was able to do a radio interview that it's
a hard thing, this is, but she has decided that

(01:11:53):
beyond X, this message has to get out, and so
doing some things that are probably outside of anyone's coming.
She this was her first radio interview. She'll be on
Blaze tomorrow. She went on a highly followed video podcast
earlier today, but this was our first radio interview and
we're going to replay it for you right now. The

(01:12:14):
things that are discussed here. I've been following this X
site for since I've found it, since Doge started, I've
been I've been going down every rabbit hole. I learned
new things in this interview I'd not heard before. And
I think you as our listeners. If you did not
hear it at the top of the five o'clock hour,
really important that you hear this, So we're replaying it.

Speaker 1 (01:12:33):
Even your mom liked it.

Speaker 2 (01:12:35):
Data Republican Mom, and thank you for following us, daut
of Republican Mom, because you got a you got a
great kid. There is a patriot and a hero, and
we are so happy that this is happening and that
we're going to bring this information to people that might
not be as savvy online or on social media. This
information needs to get out more broadly, and that's why
she said she did it. She posted that she'd been

(01:12:56):
on our show and this is why. So thank you
Data Republican Mom for helping us get the word out.

Speaker 1 (01:13:01):
We asked her at the beginning of the interview basically
how she got into this. I mean, what did she find,
why did she start this, and how it all started.

Speaker 8 (01:13:09):
I was in DC and I met with some people,
nothing to do with the government, just I was in
DC and I met with some people and we were discussing,
you know, there needs to be something in the awards
that I don't know. One person said that the system,
you know, the US spends and the web. The Uspenny

(01:13:31):
website is complicated and it's just impossible to find any
information that it's really hard to search it. So I thought,
you know, we really need a tool to do that.
So what I can do is I can download the
award website itself in its entirety and make a tool
so that you could easily look up words in the
awards website. And then when I pulled it up, everyone

(01:13:54):
started searching for awards and I figured out that it
was crazy things there. I was shocked by the things
I was reading, just crazy stuff and where the awards
were going. And it just became viral when I made
a comment on it.

Speaker 2 (01:14:08):
So, first off, this is taking your You have brought
this information to the fingertips of the public where we're
hearing from Doge and we're hearing about all of this.
You're making this available. We thank you for the hard
work and what you're doing. Let me ask you, and
this is a big question, it's probably too open ended,
but what have you what would you share with our listeners?
You have discovered that you really want people to be

(01:14:31):
aware of, something that you've drilled down in and something
that you've discovered that we didn't know, before Doge and
before you've made this publicly available.

Speaker 8 (01:14:39):
Yeah wow.

Speaker 3 (01:14:41):
You know.

Speaker 8 (01:14:42):
Part of what I did was I just did a
graph of all the money flows from the NDO to NGO.
That's all I wanted to do, just follow the numbers,
follow the money. But it was so large and so complicated.
Now there's around one hundred thousand NGOs in my database
and the certain thing, but the complication and connections between

(01:15:04):
them are so hard to analyze that there's probably around
I think like around one billion possible connections, but now
the real connection is around two hundred and fifty million
because so much money is exchanging hands. And I think

(01:15:26):
the reason why we figured this out now.

Speaker 3 (01:15:29):
Is because of AI.

Speaker 8 (01:15:31):
AI is an amazing tool for big database things like this,
and we can use against the government.

Speaker 1 (01:15:37):
Right now, let me ask these connections. As you pointed out,
there are so many connections there with the NGOs. Is
this an attempt to hide how this money is going
from NGO to NGO? I mean, are they making it
so complicated? Is very hard for the average American to
follow any of this without your work. I mean, could

(01:15:58):
any anybody follow this?

Speaker 3 (01:16:01):
Well?

Speaker 8 (01:16:02):
I hate to give any opinions and I hate to
give any specific answers like yes or no, because that's
not my point. But what I want to say is
that the whole industry is worth around I think the
number is around three trillion dollars. Around half of that
is from the government, so the numbers do lie, and

(01:16:25):
that's what I've seen, and almost all of them, and
most of them have no booths on the ground, so
they give the contract to the other person, and then
that first and give contract to another person, and so
on and so on, so it gets really deep in
the weaves. I couldn't say if it was purposeful, but
it's awful to see that it's actually happened and how
the transfers have been going down, and I hope that

(01:16:48):
a lot of people can be helped by tracking this.

Speaker 2 (01:16:51):
There was a post that you made that I thought
was incredibly insightful. You posted that you suspected that at
Elon Musk, prior to beginning this going to the Department
of Treasury in DOGE, he would have probably talked about
the importance of cutting the deficit. But you remark that
what you believe here or hearing from him now is

(01:17:12):
protecting democracy, and it's a far greater mission than maybe
cutting the deficit. Share with our listeners, what does that mean?
Talk about the uniparty, where this money goes, who pockets it?
How is democracy or how does democracy need to be
protected by someone like Elon Musk who knows how to
look at the numbers and dig into where money is

(01:17:34):
spent and how it's spent.

Speaker 8 (01:17:35):
Yes, yes, absolutely So. There's another person named my Fens
who I've talked to, and I promise he is the expert.
You know, just watch his stuff. He has many, many things,
and he pays attention and analyzes many things as well.
And I figured out independently that around eight core. There's

(01:17:56):
about eight core NGOs, most of them formed in the
Cold War times, as you could probably understand, which is
the point of that is to stop the thread of
communism around the world, which is why many of these
NGOs were formed during the Cold War. But when communism
was finished back in the day, for some reason, these
NGOs they were not resolved, and somehow money was still

(01:18:20):
moving and they didn't stop growing. They just kept growing
and growing and growing and influencing the world even when
there was nothing technically we were supposed to be influencing
now many, many politicians from both parties joined these NGOs,
and it's crazy how much money they've been receiving. Like

(01:18:41):
there's a Republican NGO called the International Republican Institute, and
then there's a Democratic NGO called the National Democratic Institute,
and they're important. I've set this point up because both
of these parties have an agreement to stop communism together
and they'll get an equal chair in their influence over

(01:19:03):
the world, so that we can influence both ways, for
the Democrats and the Republicans.

Speaker 3 (01:19:07):
E epic.

Speaker 8 (01:19:08):
The controlling opposition is real.

Speaker 2 (01:19:10):
You can see that there's no Cold War.

Speaker 3 (01:19:12):
So what are they?

Speaker 8 (01:19:13):
What are the exactly that is exactly my point. What
are we fighting now? Since communism? They they just keep
growing and growing and growing anyway, when the reason they
were growing in the first place is by communism, And
now we have nothing to fight and somehow nobody noticed,
and all of their purpose is for what to protect democracy?

(01:19:35):
But I believe that they became a democracy themselves, or.

Speaker 2 (01:19:39):
A bureaucracy or a cleptocracy.

Speaker 8 (01:19:43):
Yes, exactly. And when you think of that, think about
those eight core ENGOs that I was talking about earlier.
They are very powerful in geos with powerful politicians who
lead them, like, for example, Lindsay Braham and Donna Braven
and many many other names.

Speaker 3 (01:20:05):
That you would recognize.

Speaker 8 (01:20:07):
So all of these vengos have really powerful people in
power that have a lot of money, and.

Speaker 1 (01:20:11):
There has been no oversight whatsoever over these eight primary
NGOs that you've been looking at. Nobody has ever looked
at exactly what they're doing until now. Is that fair
to say that's correct?

Speaker 3 (01:20:25):
Nope, they have not looked because they've just.

Speaker 8 (01:20:28):
Become a government themselves, and governments are supposed to have
oversight and they do not. But it's a very complicated
and very interesting and it's very deep complict of interest
as well.

Speaker 2 (01:20:37):
So I have a question that I mentioned to someone.
By the way, there are so many people that I
know that even I'm a recovering public servant, but people
within state government who are auditors and people that work
on their budgets and states that would love to work
with someone that's really bringing things to light the way
you are. The question I was asked was can you

(01:20:57):
give us a cheat code? There's so much from out there.
What should people be looking for on your site? Data Republican?
What should they look for to really open their eyes
about what's going on around them.

Speaker 8 (01:21:11):
Yeah, that's a good question, because again it's so complicated.
I believe that we would never even know this was
a problem if we didn't have the AI to help
us make these connections. So what I'm actually doing today
is I'm developing an inpographic of those eight NGOs and
so that we can understand how they influence the world
and how they cond So that would be the good

(01:21:32):
place to start looking.

Speaker 1 (01:21:33):
Got our radio exclusive interview with Data Republican and what
she's found out about AID, and we appreciate her again
taking the time to talk to us, Like we said,
it is her first radio interview. All right, marre coming
up on the Rod and Greg Show Talk Radio one
oh five nine. Can't arress, just shut up because we're
about to get out of here.

Speaker 2 (01:21:52):
Do I suffer from infatuation?

Speaker 1 (01:21:54):
I think you do? I think yeah. With these numbers
that people are following us down, that's it. Well above
one thought and anymore on our X.

Speaker 2 (01:22:01):
Thank you, Janna Republican, you are a hero. Point point
one point one thousand followers one point one k, one
point one k.

Speaker 1 (01:22:09):
It's been a fun day we'll be back tomorrow, head up,
shoulders back. May God bless you and your family in
this great country of ours. We'll talk to you tomorrow
at four. Have a good evening.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

The Rod & Greg Show News

Popular Podcasts

40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Rod and Greg Show: DataRepublican Interview; Dems Out themselves; FEMA spending

Episode Transcript

The Rod & Greg Show News .css-1q01m3q{margin:0 0 -2px 0;}

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes