AM Show HR 2 - Leaving The Democrat Party

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Strange times. We live in strange times. Indeed, Robert F.
Kennedy Junior, the heir to the Kennedy name, which was
the Democrat gold standard for so many years. Of course,
his uncle assassinated one of the major events in American history.
His father assassinated possibly I don't know if i'd say likely,

(00:22):
but possibly on the way to the Democrat nomination in
nineteen sixty eight when he's assassinated in June of that year.
And this year, Robert F. Kennedy Junior, after running for
president as a Democrat, endorses Donald Trump. Who would have
ever guessed Jill Stein, now criticizing the Democrat Party. I
am a believer that you need a healthy Democrat Party

(00:48):
in order for the United States to operate properly. I
believe in a two party system. I believe that both
of them should be rational and reasonable and healthy. And sure,
there are more views than two parties can can accommodate.
But within that system you get some level of consensus.
And it worked, and it's worked more or less for

(01:09):
a very long time. But then this radicalization occurred within
the Democrat Party, and the very radical elements took control
of that party and just like you'll see in a
third world country. They then took control of the country
and reasonable people felt left out. My dad, a lifelong Democrat,

(01:32):
has often said that he didn't leave the Democrat Party,
the Democrat Party left him, and that takes us to
sean theory. Now, we have watched her career for several years.
She really came to our attention when and she represented
the U She was a state representative. She represented the
Meyerland area and she was voting in the Austin, Texas

(01:58):
in our state capital. She was voting on a bill
that she was against because it the well we'll get
to that. She is describing why she's voting for that bill. Now,
there should be room within the Democrat Party for disagreement,
and I can tell you that I think the vast

(02:19):
majority of Democrats would agree with her, but not the
radical wing of the Democrat Party that has taken over.
And this is in Texas, no less. Here she was
on the floor of the state capitol in Austin explaining
her vote on an issue where she was going against
what the Democrat Party was trying to.

Speaker 2 (02:37):
Do as a legislative body in this state. Both Democrats
and Republicans alike have routinely enacted legislation which shields children
from acts which placed.

Speaker 3 (02:49):
Them at an.

Speaker 2 (02:50):
Increased risk of harm. This principle is established in many
areas of public health policy, such as restricting the age
to eighteen for tattoo services in this state, restricting the
age to eighteen to get a tan at a tanning salon,

(03:11):
raising the age to twenty one to purchase tobacco cigarettes,
and ease cigarettes. These policies and regulations are in place
because we recognize that children should be protected from actions
and activities which have harmful, health risk or lifelong consequences.
This same logic must also apply when approaching the very

(03:34):
complex issue of treating gender and body dysphoria and children.
As we heard here today right now in the United States,
there is not one universal policy or standard of care
on the appropriate age that cross sex hormones should be
administered in children experiencing gender dysphoria. In fact, there is

(03:57):
significant divergence amongst both the medical and scientific community.

Speaker 3 (04:02):
One of the key aspects of.

Speaker 2 (04:04):
This debate is the use of drugs which to delay
a female child from menstruating or a biological male child
from physically maturing into his adolescence. Purity is a natural
biological process, as it starts a critical role in both
the physical and mental development.

Speaker 3 (04:24):
In all human beings.

Speaker 2 (04:26):
Concerns have been raised the hormonal suppression of purity may
permanently alter a child's neurodevelopment. It is only honest to
admit and accept that we do not know of the
long term effects that prescribing g in our age analogs

(04:48):
cross sex hormones as young as eight, nine and ten
years old, of.

Speaker 3 (04:53):
What that will do to children.

Speaker 1 (04:57):
Sean Theory was a Democrat and she was a state
representative when she cast that vote. She is no longer
either of those things. We'll talk about why that is
the case. But first, Sean Theory is our guest and welcome.
It's an honor to have you on.

Speaker 3 (05:16):
Thank you for having me. It's an honor to be here.

Speaker 1 (05:19):
Let's talk about that particular issue and take your time
and give us the background as to how that issue
bubbled up and ended up in a vote, and then
let's talk about how you came to your own conclusion,
which was independent and different than what the party was demanding.

Speaker 3 (05:39):
Sure, so for your listeners, I'll give you this some
background and context for all of this last session. Well
we're still technically in the legislative session, but we're in
the interim. But we were asked to confront an issue
that I can tell you most Americans, probably eighty percent

(05:59):
of us, would never even think that we would be
dealing with, and that is what is the appropriate age
for a child to have a sex change. I'm going
to rewind that back and say that again because most
people would say, well, why would a child be having
a sex change? But that's where we are, and that's

(06:23):
what was going on in the state of Texas, and
that's what's going on in all fifty states. So every
legislative body has now been confronted with this issue, not
only what is the appropriate aids for the sex changes,
but what is the appropriate age for a child to
take cross sex hormones? And what that would mean is,

(06:47):
if you are a boy, let's say you're thirteen, you
would start taking estrogen a boy. If you were a girl,
you would be put on testosterone high doses, also putting
children on puberty blockers. What that means is the average

(07:08):
American sitting at home drink a cup of coffee doesn't
even know what that is. Because it's not been something
that we've done as a society. All of us went
through puberty, all of us went through adolescents. It's a
natural form of not only physical development but brain development. Well,

(07:29):
there are those now through the transgender ideology movement that
has said that children should be able to skip puberty.
I guess you would say stop it altogether so that
they don't have to develop, and then that would put
them on a quicker pace to be able to get
a sexchange in a later time.

Speaker 1 (07:49):
Hold right there, Shawn Theory, Hold right there. Former state
representative Shawn Theory. She was a Democrat state representative and
she is neither as a result of taking a very
bold stand on an issue, and she was punished for it.
And we'll talk about why she made that decision and
where she is in her life. This is an uplifting story.

(08:12):
You're gonna like it.

Speaker 3 (08:13):
Coming up.

Speaker 4 (08:14):
We print every printable picture and if you don't like them,
we'll reprint them or refine your money, no matter who's
fault it is. Michael Show, your photo matters.

Speaker 1 (08:25):
Sean Theory is our guest. She was a former state representative,
Demo state representative, and she voted on an issue related
to gender, sex, sexuality, hormones that affect a child in
the state capitol as a state representative, and the Democrats

(08:46):
didn't want her breaking with what they demanded she do.
She voted in the way that I think every one
of you, and frankly, I think eighty ninety percent of
Democrats would. She refused to be caught up in the nonsense,
and they punished her for that. We're going to talk
about that and what she's doing with her life now,
which I think is a good story, why she is

(09:07):
no longer a Democrat and lots more. She'll be with
us for the hour. Sean Theory is her name? Sean,
Tell me if you would you were I had to
interrupt you. You were talking about the bill and the
bills coming up and what would be included in the bill.
Just take it from there.

Speaker 3 (09:22):
If you would.

Speaker 4 (09:24):
So.

Speaker 3 (09:25):
The bill essentially because we found out that there were
children as young as eight and nine being put on
drugs like lupron. Lupron, for those who don't know, is
a drug that we actually it's a chemical castration drug,
a castration drug that we give violent sex offenders, pedophiles,
child rapist. The only other use over the prescribe use

(09:50):
is it is. It's a very very drastic chemotherapy drug
as well. They give it to men. We have frost
sate cancer. They were giving lupron in the state of
Texas two children who do not have cancer for the
sole purpose of stunting their development, to stop a girl

(10:10):
from having a menstrual cycle, to stop a boy from
developing as a young male, as a young man. And
we were trying to figure out as a legislative body,
what do we do with this, what is the appropriate
age for this to happen if at all? Well, a
bill was drafted and authored in the Senate and by

(10:33):
Senator Campbell, and then carried in the House by Representatives
Tom Oliverson both physicians, and the bill set the age
to eighteen across the board for all of these very
very invasive I don't even I guess I could just
call them procedures, because I cannot call it healthcare. This

(10:55):
is literally giving an eighteen year old child the right
to amputate healthy body parts. So the bill set the
age of to eighteen. You would think that that would
have been a bipartisan bill, that that would have been
deemed reasonable if anything. I actually heard from some constituents
that thought the bill should have been twenty one, when

(11:16):
after all, you FB twenty one and even purchase alcohol
or cigarettes now. But my caucus, my former caucus, the
Democrat caucus, decided that we should oppose that very reasonable bill,
that we shouldn't put those safeguards in place for children,
solely so that we could appease special interest groups, which
in this instance it would have been various organizations throughout

(11:40):
the state and around the country that are run by
the LGBTQIA. Plus they came to the Capitol, they were
going to Democrat Democrat members' offices and lobbying and advocating
that we should kill this bill, and by doing so
would mean that there would be no age, there would

(12:02):
be no restrictions, that they would just allow any child,
meaning you could be nine, you could be nineteen, you
could be seven, you could be seventeen, you could be twelve.

Speaker 2 (12:13):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (12:14):
And again these are things, these are cases that were
already happening. We had girls as young as thirteen getting
doubleness sectomies that did not have cancer h solely because
someone has told them they were born in the wrong
body and that if they cut off their healthy rest tissue,
that they would become a boy.

Speaker 1 (12:34):
Sean, let me let me go on to something.

Speaker 3 (12:37):
Yeah, I know, it's a lot to unpack.

Speaker 1 (12:38):
It's a lot of there is and we're going to
get we're going to get into it. But Sean, let's
go back. You were talking about the special interests who
came to the Capitol to try to get y'all to
kill this bill that provided protections for children, and you
said that they the special interests were very powerful and
they came and they're very I've seen a lobbying effort

(12:59):
at work in in the Capitol. I know what that
looks like. Tell me who these special interests were and
who they served.

Speaker 3 (13:08):
Yes, so I know Equality Texas was a major one.
They have a financial arm called the Victory Fund that
funds their efforts. I don't know the name of all
of the groups. I know Equality Texas is a big one.
Different LGBTQ political caucuses from Houston, Dallas, all around the state.

(13:29):
They got on buses, they came to the capital. They
actually the night that the night that the bill was
being heard in the House in the Public Health Committee.
They as far as I say it guys. Because I'm
free now, I can tell you, guys everything that happened
in the truth without too much more fear of retribution.

(13:50):
They mocked to me, what was what we did in
the civil rights movement? And my parents were very active
in the civil rights movement, and my mom was March
with Barbara Jordan and she was a part of the
sit ins that they would do to integrate movie theaters
and lunch counters and schools and what have you. They
did what was called a die in, and they had

(14:11):
LGBTQ activists come to the Capitol, I guess in the
thousands it looked like, and lie down on the floor
all over. We have to step over them and pretend
that they were dying, and that they were dead, and
that we were somehow murdering them by putting safeguards in

(14:31):
place for children. That if the bill were just to
say that you have to wait till you're eighteen before
you amputate healthy body parts, that somehow that's causing them
to die. And so they called it a die in,
which was a slap in the face as far as
I saw it to all of the African Americans that
did the sit ins, and that were hosed by dogs

(14:51):
and sprayed by police officers. Backs in not just African Americans,
good white people also of good conscience and care.

Speaker 1 (15:00):
Sean theory is our guest. She is a former Democrat
state representative who stood up to the Democrat establishment and
sought to protect children, supporting a bill that would have
provided protections to children against basically sex change hormones and processes.
And the Democrats punished her for that, they kicked her

(15:23):
out of office. And we'll talk about what she's doing
with her life now in just a moment. But one
of the things, Sean that comes up again and again
is that there is a financial interest behind this process,
pharmaceutical companies and institutions, and in fact, Haim or Heim

(15:43):
spoke out against this, the doctor, and now he's being prosecuted.
Did you get a sense of the money behind the
big money behind this process that wanted to make sure
that they can still do this?

Speaker 3 (15:56):
Oh? Absolutely, Even planned pair hood is a part of this.
If they're not just abortion, it's not your father's osmobile anymore.
I imagine that. I guess once the federal law changed
and planned parenthood was not able to provide abortions in
Texas as readily. Do you know now they provide cross

(16:19):
sex hormones for children. That's what they were doing before
this bill kicked in. That is another way for them
to make money. There were gender clinics in the state
of Texas where you could walk in and in thirty
minutes a child could be given a letter saying that
they are diagnosed with gender dys warrior. And then you

(16:40):
could take that letter and go to an endochronologist or
a physician who could immediately start putting you on cross
sex hormon therapy or putting you on loopron to stop
you from developing. These doctors did this knowing that the
data now tells us that the purity blockers stunt children's growth,
It causes lack of bone density, puts them on the

(17:02):
track for osteoporosis, it causes infertility, sterility, all of these,
you know, horrible maladies and morbidities. They know this, but yes,
there's big money in it because the bottom lines are
is once they do this, they are life time medical patients.

(17:25):
And I could not in good conscience participate in something
like this solely to a peace specially insure What did R.

Speaker 1 (17:32):
FK Junior say? That there's nothing more profitable for a
big pharmer than a sick child, and that once you
understand that you've got a lifelong customer, there's a reason
they don't retires. It will last a lifetime. They want
to sell you moral.

Speaker 3 (17:46):
It's it's well, I'll tell you then, said Nelson men
Nelson Mandela said, a society shall be judged by how
it treats its children.

Speaker 1 (17:53):
Amen, hold with me. Sean Theory is our guest. Former
state representative will continue our conversation with her company. So
Michael Berry shows Shohn Theory was a very well respected
and admired state representative. She represented the Meyerland area in
the state Capitol as a Democrat. She was considered moderate.

(18:14):
She's a black woman. She's well spoken, she was known
to be very well researched before advocacy of particular positions.
She was known to be a person who was accessible
to both Republicans and Democrats. In short, she was the
type of person that you would want to be serving

(18:34):
in public office. Then a bill came before the state Capitol,
and the bill would provide protections for children that no
matter how wacky their mother or friend or counselor was
you could not put them on medicines or on pharmaceutical
products pills, or provide procedures that would change them for

(18:57):
life that they might regret. Because she supported that bill
and spoke on its behalf, she was ostracized and targeted
by the Democrat Party. They would go on to defeat
her from her seat, and it's pretty awful what they did.
But back to the issue, Sean, We'll get to that
in a moment. Let's talk about we were talking about

(19:20):
the powerful interest and that's when we went to break.
Did you get a sense of the money behind this?
And who can you name names as to who those
people are? You mentioned Planned parenthood, but there are others,
aren't there?

Speaker 3 (19:32):
Yeah, Equality taxes is the one that I said, and
I can't even think of all the different groups. But
it is solely for the purpose if it's money. But
I want to be clear, and I have to say this,
it's even more sinister than just the financial profit. This

(19:54):
is flat out a plan, a design sinister designed to
sterilize and castrate children. Now the reason behind it, Lord knows.
I mean, all I can say is it is population control.
I mean clearly. I mean there was a time when

(20:16):
less than five cent of children even identified as transgender.
But there's a I can give you the statistic in
twenty twenty two. Now more than three hundred thousand American
children identify that way from ages thirteen to seventeen. There

(20:37):
is clearly an agenda to confuse children, to make them
believe that they were born in the wrong body, which
is all a form of self hate. And so, yes,
they were at the Capitol, they were calling, they were
sending emails, and then when the scuttle butt got out
that represented theory. She may not be drinking the kool aids, y'all.

(21:04):
She's asking questions, she's doing her own research, she's reading
medical journals, she knows the facts. She's a lawyer, she's reading.
So then they put out the cattle call to start
swarming on me, and they started sending them to come
talk to me, which, hey, that's my job. I listened,
I engaged. They sent parents to tell me that their

(21:28):
children you were born in the wrong body. And all
I can tell you is time and time again, the
parents that I talked to, with all due respect, they
sounded completely indoctrinated and borderline insane. I had a mother
tell me that she knew her son was a girl

(21:49):
when he was four, And I asked her, why, how
did you know that? Why did you think that? And
she said because she took her little boy to dsw
which is a story here in Houston, and to buy
some tennis shoes and he liked the light up shoes.
So okay, that was it. That's all she wrote. She
knew she had a girl, and she proceeded. By the

(22:11):
time her son was eight, she had put him on
the puberty blockers. She's transitioning her child, her daughter, and
he goes by the pronouns of they and them.

Speaker 1 (22:24):
Let me stop you for a second there. What it
strikes me, and I see that I see this a
fair amount, is that in her mind, she's doing the
right thing. She's trying to This may not have come
natural to her, but she's trying to do the right
thing for her child because this is what she's being
told that this is the healthy thing to do, rather

(22:44):
than be the parent and and do the right thing.
Is that the impression you got, because some of these moms,
they have multiple kids, they're they're pushing the kid toward this.
Do you get the impression with these moms, what do
you get a sense of what wants this kid to
be this way?

Speaker 3 (23:01):
I think there's two types, and I don't want to
say this with all compassion and empathy. I have met parents,
very well meaning parents who fit into the first category
you said, who don't know what to do, and who
have been told by this industry, these these clinics and
these doctors and people you know, social media and just

(23:23):
messaging and just the left people. They know their neighbors
that they're helping their child by yielding to this, this illness,
this warm of mental illness, no different than anorexia. There
are those, I will tell you, and many of them
now have these de transitioned their children, because when their
children grew out of it or came out of it,

(23:45):
the parents said, oh my god, what was I thinking?
You know? And their parents suffer from extreme guilt because
they've said to me, I should have put like the down,
I should have taken a different approach. But they were
they were manipulated by doctors telling them that if you
don't do this, your child is more than likely going
to kill themselves. I had a mom tell me that

(24:06):
a doctor told her who stitch a profit from all this,
and she had a son that you can either have
a dead son or a live daughter, and so she
was terrified. You know, now her son no longer wants
to be a girl and is a d transitioner. So
there's that category, and Elon Musk even fits into that category.

(24:30):
The powerful, brilliant Elon Musk has gone on record saying
that he too fell prey to these doctors and counselors
and this whole movement, and he thought that was bess
for his child, but until he became aware. The second
group are people mostly mothers, and I'll just be we

(24:54):
talk about identity politics, mostly white, very radical in their politics,
progressive women who are politicizing this issue, and for some
reason have chosen to allow their children to be political pawns.
They have pushed it on their children. They teach it
to their children before their children can barely speak. And

(25:14):
so the lady that I spoke with actually seemed to
be of the second category. Children like things that light up.
You know, we used to go to the circus. We
see all kinds of light up things. There was no
other indication that her son even knew that that was
something that would make him a girl. I met women
who were just it's sad. They were attention seekers and

(25:36):
they seem to want to be validated by their political
ran so much so.

Speaker 1 (25:41):
John Theory is our guest. More about why she left
the Democrat Party and why the Democrats targeted her for
office coming.

Speaker 3 (25:47):
Out You've got the Michael Berry Show.

Speaker 1 (25:51):
John Theory is our guest. She was a state representative
who voted alongside Republicans on an issue on a bill,
and she did so on the basis of principle. She
explained that she voted to protect children. Well, that used
to be something we could all agree on, to protect

(26:11):
children against these monsters who want to transition them. And
the Democrats said, you can't think for yourself, you can't
have your own ideas, and they targeted her. It's awful
what they did. All right, So you were talking about
some of these mothers, not all, but some of these
mothers of these children. It's as if they are the

(26:33):
one wanting kind of a moon child's and by proxy
concept of they want the attention of having a child.
And look at how forward and progressive I am.

Speaker 3 (26:44):
Yes, you took the words right out of my mouth.
I was just about to say it's kind of trend.
Childsen by proxy. They dragged their children to the Capitol
and made them read letters in committee hearings and put
their children out on front street to parade them away
in front of everyone. They they have, they've openly told

(27:06):
us they started discussing these things with their children. And
I've said this recently. When you hear a six year
old say that they're non binary, that's not natural vocabulary
for any six year old. So who told you that?
Who told you that? How do you even know what

(27:26):
that word means? Because they're sixty year olds right now.
The ninety percent of people that are sixty in this
country don't even know what that means. Because there's a
relatively new term of art.

Speaker 1 (27:37):
It is true language that is so true.

Speaker 3 (27:40):
Yeah, yeah, it's not even a real world. It wasn't
even a real word some years ago. So these terms
of art and these euphemisms and this choice of language
started to influence people. So I'll take you back a
little further. When the bill first came out, the Democratic
the House Democratic Caucus initially seemed to be open to

(28:02):
discussing it. As a caucus. We were actually during the
interim before we came back to session and they told
us it was during COVID that we were going to
meet and we were going to hear from doctors and
we were going to have all these conversations about it. Well,
the next thing I knew, we gabbled in. And a
month or two later it says, oh, guys, we all

(28:22):
have to kill this bill. We're all against it. Oh
we got to, you know, go against the Republicans on this.
They're trying to infringe upon LGBTQ IA plus rights. And
I was like, what, why is this an LGBT No,
this is a children's issue, and what the Here's where

(28:42):
the real hypocrisy is. And I hope everybody hears this.
Every other piece of legislation, the left, the Democrats, the
Progressives vote to raise the age. This is the only
time not only did they not want to raise the age,
they want to set any age. Democrats have voted to
raise the age, try to hand them from eighteen to

(29:03):
twenty one. Democrats voted to raise the age from eighteen
to twenty one to purchase tobacco cigarettes. Democrats raise the
age from eighteen to twenty one to purchase e cigarettes. Alcohol.
As I told you, you have to be eighteen in
the state of Texas to even get a tattoo with
parental consent. And that's good public policy. And I'll tell

(29:25):
you why it is because we appreciate the fact that
children cannot consent to the lifetime risk of possibly contracting
hepatitis from a dirty needle. In addition, we know that
their frontal lobes of their brains aren't completely developed, so
they may not appreciate the fact that this is permanent.

(29:46):
So Democrats supported that we raise the age from eighteen
to twenty one to work in a sexually oriented business.
I'm the joint author of that bill. I got every
single Democrat and most Republicans I've almost all voted on that.
Why is it that this is the only area of
the law that the Democratic Party has decided, Oh no,

(30:08):
we don't want to we don't want any age. Eighteen
is too old. But we don't even want to say fifteen.
We want nothing. We want just pure access to mutilate
children and medicalize them with cross sex hormones. It is

(30:28):
the most bizarre, sinister thing I've ever seen. And my colleagues,
the few that pulled me to the side. There were several. Actually,
I will say that agreed with me, and I've gone
on record saying this, but I'll say it again. I
was told, Sean, we know it's wrong. We know how

(30:50):
you feel because you've got a daughter. Not that my
daughter's dealing with any of this, but they, I guess,
you know, everyone knew that because I'm around children more
seven year old, that I'm more ostensitive to it. They said, Sean,
just hold your nose and vote with us, and I said, yeah,

(31:11):
just hold your nose. I said, I can't do that.
They said, you're going to have to, Sean. You're going
to have to otherwise you're going to lose your seat.
The LGBTQ activists, the Democratic Party, the Progressive Party is
going to come after you and you're going to be primaried.
And it was a self fulfilling prophecy. That's exactly what happened.

(31:34):
They put upward to more than a quarter of million
dollars against me to take me out solely for voting
to set the age to eighteen. Because it it sunlight
is the best disinfectant of my dad used to say,
is because I spoke on it, I created awareness. I

(31:55):
told people the truth about what this euthanism of gender
affirming care really is. I said, you, guys, if you
if you feel it's so right, tell the people of
Texas the truth. Tell them it's sex change surgeries for children.
Stop calling it gender firm and care. Just say sex
change surgeries for children. If you're so proud about it,

(32:17):
then they would say, oh, that's not happening. Well, that's
not happening. You don't have a problem with this little
law that says it can't happen, correct to their eighteen
Oh no, no, no, we're going to stand on the House
floor for forty two hours straight and try to kill
the bill. Okay, well, tell people you want to inject
little black girls. It's We'll tell the black community you

(32:39):
want to give these girls testosterone and stop them from
having a menstrual cycle and put them on the pathway
for diabetes because it causes PCOS, which causes inful resistance,
which is a precursor to diabetes. And you know that
African Americans have the highest rates of diabetes in this country.
Go tell the black community that Democrats vote.

Speaker 1 (33:01):
You know, they don't really sell this stuff to blacks.
I notice this is this is kind of a Scandinavian,
white European descendant, white liberal thing they push. I have
noticed that. Why do you think that is, well, yeah.

Speaker 3 (33:18):
Because that's how it's starting. That's exactly right, and it's
it's their thing. But they're using black elected officials to
push it and then to normalize it in our community,
and so it will become you know, if I let
if I have anything to say about it. That's why
they were so upset, because they want to normalize it

(33:39):
so that it becomes popular in every community, the black community,
the Hispanic community. It's being run as like an underground
railroad right now. It's a very covert campaign. And that
is another reason why I was penalized and bullied and canceled,
is because I was telling the truth in my own community.

Speaker 1 (34:02):
I Seawn theory. Shawn Theory is our guest. Uh, let's
get to what she's doing now. She has taken uh
lemons and made delightful lemonade. Will have to tell you
that story, you know, mhm.