Brad Maaske Fills In - Tulare Co. Sheriff Mike Boudreaux Talks About Prop. 36

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
If you want to call, The Trevor Carey Show is
five five nine two three zero forty two forty two.
That's two three zero forty two forty two, very close
to my number forty four forty four, but you know
it is. It is the Power Show, so we'll keep
that up. I'm sitting in for Trevor. He's taken a

(00:21):
short break. I do my show on air from noon
until one o'clock on Saturdays, followed by The Jody Jones Show,
another good show. If you're listening on Saturdays, you're welcome
to listen in and again. I'm a licensed general contractor
and real estate broker. I've been self employed in business
in the to Larry County area Exeter, Vice, Cilia doing

(00:42):
working Fresno as well since nineteen seventy eight. I tell
people I was in third grade when I started in business,
but that's not actually true. I'm just getting older. But
it beats the alternative. And I do a talk show
that's conservative talk, and I love that Power Talk supports
conservative talk. As I said before the break, I'm going

(01:03):
to have Sheriff Boudreau from Tallarry County come on a
little bit later in this hour, we're going to talk
about Proposition thirty six. And there are ten bills that
the Democrats passed. And I say the Democrats, I might
as well say the Socialist in Sacramento past because we
have one party rule that they were trying to stop
us from Prop thirty six from taking place, because they're

(01:26):
going to get tough on crime, but they don't like
to get tough on crime. So they're going to get
a little bit tough on crime, if that makes sense.
But you heard some commercials about power, and you've heard
about the rising cost of power, and if you just
got through a very hot summer, you saw the highest
electric bills you've had in your life. And this is
by design, and this is by the government's plan, because

(01:52):
they want to force you to use that cheap free
green energy. Cheap free, clean green energy, that's what they say.
If you listen to my Saturday show, you've heard me
talk about this before. But the reason that our power
costs or doubling is because of the cheap, free clean
green energy coming from the sun and the wind blowing.

(02:14):
And that's because it's not cheap and it's not free.
It's expensive, it requires infrastructure, it messes up the existing infrastructure.
But the most important thing to understand is that for
every solar panel you put on a roof so that
you can have some free sun power somewhere, there has
to be something backing it up so when the sun
doesn't shine, it's still there. So whatever the state's power

(02:37):
need is. When we're getting our power fund from unreliable
sources like the sun, which doesn't shine twenty four hours
a day, and like the wind, which doesn't blow twenty
four hours a day, we have to have an equal
amount of backup power for that. So that'd be like
if your house is normal, electric bill was three hundred dollars,

(03:00):
but you have to produce enough power to double it,
your power bill would double. And that's what's happened to
our electric rates in California, and they're still going up.
And they're going up because of inflation costs, this higher
cost of doing business, higher cost of wages, environmental costs,
and because of all the new electricity we need so
that we can go all electric. I mean, one of

(03:22):
the things people don't realize is is the power needs
of AI. Artificial intelligence uses massive computers. Elon Musk just
turned on his the biggest AI in the world. One
hundred thousand computers that he turned on and one hundred
thousand computers that he turned on this week use enough

(03:44):
power to power a city of two hundred and fifty
thousand people. That's one AI business in one city that
needs enough power to power two hundred and fifty thousand
residents and a million gallons of fresh water a day
to cool the computers that are running there. So when

(04:07):
we're talking about AI coming in in this increased power demand,
you not only have the electric cars that they're bringing
in driving up that cost. You have AI coming in
that's going to be built that's going to drive up
the amount of power needed. And quite honestly, it can't
be done. We can't build enough power transmission lines by

(04:28):
twenty thirty five to even come close to the state's goals.
But that doesn't stop the state from making unrealistic goals
that they know will never work. That doesn't stop the
state from being stupid when they implement legislation. Let's go
back about fifteen years or twenty years ago when they
said that you know those paper bags you get at

(04:49):
the store, they're killing trees to use those bags, and
we got to quit killing trees. We can't be cutting
our forests down to make paper bags. Let's go to
plastic bags. Plastic bags are so much better than paper bags.
And then we had these really thin cheap plastic bags

(05:10):
and they said, wow, we can't recycle the really thin
cheap plastic bags. We have another brilliant idea. Let's replace
really thin cheap plastic bags with big, fat, thick ones.
That'll be the key. We got rid of the paper bags.
We got these thin things that are blowing all over,
choking the turtles and the dolphins in the parking water

(05:32):
getting caught in them. We're gonna do even fatter, thicker
plastic bags because we're going to recycle those. Well, those
can't be recycled either. You see the dirty little lie
about recycling plastic as they've never been recycling it. They'd
been putting it on ships and taking it to China,
and China was dumping it into the rivers in the
ocean from there. And that was look at our recycling plan.

(05:55):
We can dump all these bottles in all these plastic
and it goes to China and magically they're doing something
that doesn't hurt the environment, like dumping it in the water.
Then we had COVID, and then we had the part
that you couldn't get any tanker ships, and then China said,
I don't want any more of your plastic. It's actually
starting to bother our rivers now. And now California realizes, gee,

(06:17):
you know what I got this great idea plastic is bad.
Let's kill some trees and make paper bags. I argued
on air when they were passing the law about the
paper bags that you had to change. Do you realize
that these trees are grown specifically to make paper bags.
I mean, that's the purpose of them is to make

(06:40):
a paper bag. These are not your old forest growth
trees out there that we're going and cutting down and
making paper out of them. They're junk wood we can't
do anything else with. They're the waste from our lumber yards.
And we're making paper bags out of them. And guess what,
not only are they recyclable, they fully down in the

(07:00):
environment because they're natural. And guess where we're going in California.
The genius has got back to paper bags. I wonder
when though decide we're killing trees again and take those
back out. But I digress. So what's going on with
our power? So we pass all these bonds to create
more water storage because we have water issues, and they

(07:21):
use those to tear down dams. Those are dams, the
four dams in California two hundred and fifty million, to
tear them down. We're producing electricity. But they don't like
that anymore. They don't like dams hydropower, even though it's
clean and green, because it's harming the fish. So again
I told you the environmentalists always lie. So what's the

(07:41):
lie of the environmentalists that if we tear down these
dams the salmon will come back. Just get rid of
the dams and the salmon will come back. So in
the nineteen seventies, after the dams were starting to really
get built, they realized that the salmon were dying because
the salmon could not get upstream so that they could
breed and come back down to the ocean, and so
they started putting fish ladders in everywhere in all of

(08:04):
the dams that the salmon can go through. They also
realized that the salmon were getting chopped up by the
propellers that create the electricity, and they began to protect
those so that I almost no salmon would be killed
by these propellers. By nineteen eighty eight, they weren't killing
hardly any salmon because of the dams. The salmon were
absolutely able to go upstream and do what they needed

(08:26):
to do and give us more salmon, and the population
of the salmon was increasing greatly. This is scientific fact,
Green people that the salmon were not hurt by the
dams after they put the fish ladders in and quit
chopping them up. But what did we do about the
same time back in the early eighties. It's illegal now
to kill seals or sea lions. They're protected species. And

(08:49):
you want to know what seals and sea lions, and
sea lions in particular love. Want to know what one
of their favorite foods is. Oh, they love salmon. They
love salmon as much as my putty tat does. My
putty tat likes salmon. So do the sea lions. And
these are big beasts and there's lots of them, and
the sea lions are eating salmon like crazy. And you

(09:12):
can't hunt sea lions, and you can't kill sea lions.
And when you go to the beach now and you
see them all over the beaches and they're chasing you off.
Go to the central coast. Take a look at what's happening.
Look at the rock. Smell the smell. The sea lions
are still eating all of the salmon. The salmon are
not coming back. So what are the environmentalists do? We

(09:33):
need to tear down more dams. We're gonna have to
look at how we can tear down the dams along
the Snake River. You know, I don't really like those
dams along the Snake River in Washington. Now, Washington is
a state right next to us. I have to say this,
like Kamala Harris was really one state over, and it's
a state that gets most of its power from hydro

(09:54):
electric power. That's cheap energy, and it is cheap energy.
The average price per kill a WAT hour for delivered
electricity in the state of Washington right now is about
nine and a half cents of kill a WAT hour.
Compare that to your base price of thirty five cents
going up to fifty five and sixty cents of kill
a WAT hour. Because they get their power from those

(10:16):
dams and they want to take those dams out because
those dams are killing salmon, which is a lie. But
they can repeat the lie because the lie was true
in the seventies and you never learned that they lie.
The environmentalists want one thing, and that is to control you.
They want their own power. You see, socialists have halves

(10:38):
and have nots. You're a have not comrade. We will
tell you what you can do. We're going to tear
down these dams and we'll just replace them with solar
power because it's free power from the sun. Don't worry
if we put it in deserts and it kills the tortoises.
Don't worry if we make these massive lasers that burn
the birds up by Las Vegas. We do it because

(11:01):
it's good. When you do it, you idiots, it's bad.
So your power bills are going to go up. They're
going to continue to go up. They have to build
more power lines. They have all kinds of things that
they must do.

Speaker 2 (11:14):
The assisted Trevor carry showing on The Valley's Power.

Speaker 1 (11:18):
Dog in for Trevor Carrey on The Valley's Power Talk.
Trevor's getting a little bit of time off, so I'm
filling in. Normally I'm here on Saturdays from noon to one,
but it's I'm humbled to be in for Trevor this
afternoon and talking about all the things going on in
this crazy world. We're talking about the dams. They're turning
them down. They're lying the salmon are getting through. The

(11:40):
science shows that ninety six to ninety seven percent of
the salmon are able to get through these dams. So
that's not why they're turning them down. Has nothing to
do with the salmon. But it makes them feel good
to say that. But it will make the power more expensive,
and we do get some of our power from the
excess power from Washington State. So again, the environmentalists do

(12:00):
these things to us, just like they don't give us
water in the valley, Claiming that the pumps will kill
the salmon, claiming that the sound of the pumps confused
the fish and the delta smelt because the noise was
too funny and they didn't know how to swim anymore.
All the weird stuff that environmentals do. And remember that
because we have the end of the Biden administration, Resident

(12:23):
Biden will be gone no matter who comes in. They're
afraid Trump will come in. They're making sure that the
valley doesn't get any water before Trump comes in. Because
Trump was open to relooking at the biological studies and saying,
is this really working cutting off water to ag in
the valley. Trump was open to that, so they did
look at those studies. They reevaluated them, and they said

(12:45):
we could give a lot more water to the valley
and still save the delta and still save the fish.
And they started to give us water. Newsom sued immediately
and said you can't do that. And now they're trying
to work out this joint agreement between Newsom and the
state water controllers the FEDS over our water. They're holding
the hearings. Now we have representing Valdeo, we have others

(13:07):
representing us who are trying to stop this. But they're
going to reach a final decision before Trump comes in
to stop them. That's assuming that Trump does come in.
And with some of the things that Trump is saying lately,
I'm wondering if he's just asking them to try to
take him out again, right, you know, I mean, how
did the accidentally there's nobody protecting him while he's at

(13:28):
a rally. That was no accident. They really don't care.
The deep state, the machine does not want a Trump
in there. He's a disruptor. He will disrupt the government,
he will disrupt the war machine. He'll disrupt all of that.
But think about the things that he's doing right now
that are just poking the bear. Rfj R f j

(13:49):
K Junior. Bobby is going to be in charge of
taking a look at what we're doing with vaccines. Bobby
is going to be in charge if taking a look
at shootings and assassination attempts of presidents. Bobby's going to
get to see the JFK files that Trump said that

(14:10):
he would release, but then he didn't because they were
told not to. Do you think the CIA, the deep state,
the FBI, do you think they want us to see
what really happened when JFK was killed? Do you think
they really want to see what happened when RFK Junior's
father was killed? They don't want you to see it.

(14:30):
This is, believe me, this is poking the bear for
Trump to say that, and I love it. I love
that he is going to be open to challenging the
settled science that we're going to discuss this that we
have a denier, a science denier who says that not
all vaccines are good and not everybody should get four

(14:50):
hundred vaccines. There are some that are not good, and
there are some things we should be testing better before
we're totally in bed with big pharma. I think it's
great to have a skeptic in there. Isn't that what
scientists are supposed to be. They're supposed to have a theory.
They're supposed to test the theory. If the theory doesn't
work out right, then they try a new theory until

(15:11):
they figure out what's really going on. Unlike the science
of climate change, when you predict something and it doesn't work,
you go back and falsify the facts. It's not warm enough,
so we have to cool the past to make it
look hotter. Now the science is insane. But what's the
second thing that Trump says he's going to do. He's

(15:31):
talking about having Elon Musk be appointed to a government
efficiency committee. Elon Musk to look at government efficiency. Elon Musk,
who was able to fire half the employees from Twitter
and still make it work. Elon Musk, who was able
to say, I can build a rocket cheaper than NASA

(15:51):
can build it, and build it and build it successfully.
Elon Musk, whose rocket is going to save Boeing whose
rocket doesn't work fly to the space station. Elon Musk
who says I'm going to allow free speech on X
formerly known as Twitter, I think you have to say
that right. Nobody know what you're saying. If you say X,

(16:12):
this Elon Musk is going to be in charge of
government efficiency, helping to find ways to make government more efficient.
I tell you Trump is just being asked to be killed.
This is just you know that he's making everybody mad
at him. Every power group that's in there the Washington
Swamp cannot have this happened. That's why you're seeing that

(16:34):
the news organizations that are now just again the propaganda
arm of the Democrat Party. That's why they'll never ask
Kamala any kind of serious question because she is just
a cog in the machine. They are a machine. They
have an agenda. It's part of the worldwide agenda that
they want to control the world and upeons shut up,

(16:57):
don't bother them with facts. And she's a willing participant
in it. She'll take any side of any issue that
she needs to take, doesn't matter what it is, whatever
she has to do to get elected. I mean, she's
a bigger flip flopper than John Carrey, who was was
against the war before he was for the war after
he was against it, or whatever she did. She was

(17:20):
for banning straws before, she's not for banning straw She
was for banning fracking, but not for banning fracking. She
really wants in all of the above kind of energy
policy that includes everything that we're doing. Let's see what
else is she flip flopped on. You name it if
it's environmental. Oh yeah, she was for letting criminals out
of jail before, she was for putting criminals in jail. Yes,

(17:42):
that Kamala Harris, who was the public defender, who is
the attorney general who was letting people out to kill
people in San Francisco, The attorney general who had a
policy that was not adopted, thankfully after much pushback, that
if you found a drug dealer, we had to arrest
them three times before the drug dealer could be prosecuted

(18:05):
for anything, because you give them a chance, you know, Brad.
The thing with society's we're so mean to these criminals.
I mean, why is it that they're doing repeat offenses.
It's because something's wrong in their life.

Speaker 2 (18:17):
And why don't we have.

Speaker 1 (18:18):
A social net for these people that beat people up
and rob them and kill people. Where's our social net?
Why do you only think of prison? You're such a
mean Christian that you want to lock these people up
when a true Christian would want to help them. This
is Kamala who's now tough on crime against the border wall.
Now she's four of the border Wall. Speaking of Kamala,

(18:41):
we're going to take a short break, and after the
short break, I'm going to get Mike Boudreaux, Sheriff of
Tillarry County back on. He's going to talk about the
state of California's ten laws that they passed to try
to stop Proposition thirty six from passing.

Speaker 2 (18:55):
The assistant Trevor Cherry show on The Valley's Power.

Speaker 1 (18:59):
Talk and for Trevor carry on The Valley's Power Doc.
Trevor is getting a short break and so I'm filling
in for him, and we have a special guest on
the phone right now. This is Sheriff Boudreaux from Tillarry County.
Sheriff was also formerly a running for Congress, but it
is not right now, and Sheriff has always been a

(19:21):
friend of the Valley and our friend. Sheriff Boudreau, glad
to have you on the air. A couple of things.
First of all, we want to talk about Proposition thirty six,
about what that means. We've got the ten bills that
the legislature passed. I want to talk about the gangs
in Aurora that took over an apartment complex and could

(19:42):
that happen in the valley. And finally, or even first,
I hear you're going to speak before testify with the
House Judiciary Committee next week.

Speaker 3 (19:52):
That correct, Yeah, Brad, it's good to have beyond here.
It's always good to speak with you and see you. Yeah,
that's a lot to unfold right there. So you know,
if you want to talk about the Judiciary Committee, we
can hit that first. I suppose I was invited back
by committee chair, Congressman Jordan, Jim Jordan, to come back

(20:13):
and testify in regards to much of the issues that
I've been talking about nationally lately. There's been a lot
of national attention in regards to our open and unsecure border,
which many of us talk about. But what most of
those stories focus on are those those border cities, those
counties that are right along the border, and so the

(20:35):
focus of interest for my testimony is going to be
talking about the millions of people coming into the United
States and how it impacts mainstream America, you know, in
the heart of America. And so I speak about the
Central Valley in regards to crime, the impacts of crime

(20:57):
here and some of the issues that we have fail
do they want to hear those stories, And so I
fly out next week to speak before the House Judiciary
Committee in regards to those points.

Speaker 1 (21:07):
And we appreciate it. And again, you know, they're talking
about the millions coming into the United States, how many
are crossing the California border, and once they're crossing the
California border, where are they're going And where's the cheapest
place that they can live once they get into California.
We may not be sanctuary for them in the valley,
but we're certainly a place where the gangs and the

(21:28):
drugs and they can hang out, right. And I mean
the impact on bringing more and more people. Our social
service networks are overrun, the hospitals, the all of the
services they get. It's critical that we stop that. But
being in real estate and watching this this thing in Aurora, Colorado,

(21:49):
and I've actually had a chance to talk to the
city council woman there, who's been she was trying to
stop it for two months, told them it's going on.
These gangs actually went in and started collecting the rents,
forcing the tenants to pay them. Told the landlord go
away or we'll kill you. If you've seen the news,
they're heavily armed. They're moving people out. And Colorado, which

(22:10):
is a blue state like California, didn't used to be
but has turned badly blue, seems to be doing nothing.
Even the mayor was ignoring her. The governor's acting like
it's not happening. And I said, that could happen in California. Well,
what would we do here? How would we stop it
if that's happening? And I know you've got some answers

(22:32):
because I know some things you have done, You've hit
issues like that. Can you tell us a little bit
about that.

Speaker 3 (22:38):
Well, let's touch on California. You know, California is a
sanctuary state. Under Senate Bill fifty four, our California legislator
allowed for California to be a sanctuary state, and so
for I, as a sheriff and all the sheriffs in
the state of California. Historically, when someone would come into
our jail, we would be able to ask their immigration status,

(22:59):
We would be able to work with ICE, we would
be able to work with border patrol to determine which
of those who were here illegally and which caused the
most egregious or potentially threat, potential threat to the safety
of America, to the safety of our community up and
down the San Joaquin Valley. And we used to work

(23:20):
with ICE very very closely. And what's interesting for people
to understand is ICE would not always deport each and
every person. That's not how it worked. They would identify
those who were felonious, those who were committing serious egregious crimes,
and those who were wanted by the countries outside of
the borders of the US. That has since gone away.

(23:42):
We can no longer ask someone or work with ICE.
In regards to Senate Bill fifty four, it's no longer allowed.
I honestly don't think most people are most voters are
or even aware of that. I think a lot of
things that take place in Sacramento, most voters are not
aware of what's taking place. And so that's what I'm doing,

(24:04):
is I'm using my voice as best I can to
those who will hear me and let them know that
public safety is our priority and it's in jeopardy if
the incident like Aurora occurred here, we obviously would not
put up with that. That is an invasion at takeover.
That is a criminal act that's taking place, and we

(24:24):
would not allow that to occur here. We would use
every resource in law enforcement available to me that we
would go in and take back the property owned by
someone else. Now, having said that, one of the reasons
that I really pushed back against Senate Bill fifty four
at the time was that a couple reasons. One is,

(24:46):
we must be able to work with ice. We must
be able to identify those who are the most dangerous
to the safety of our communities. But you have to
get deeper into the roots. And I think it's important
for people to understand that we have many people that
are here working in our fields. There's many people from
different countries that are migrant farm labor, but there's also entrepreneurs,

(25:08):
business people, and those who have created successful businesses. When
you have the criminal element for other countries coming in,
what we're finding is is that we have these drug lords,
these gang lords that are in small migrant communities, farming
towns where just what you spoke of earlier in Aurora,
where they were having to the people living in that building,

(25:30):
we're paying rent to those who took over the building.
That's occurring here. If you want to live safely in
these communities, then they have to do what's called pay rent.
They have to pay the drug lord, they have to
play the cartel member, they have to pay the human
trafficker to live safely in those towns. And Senate Bill
fifty four has created even in a more dangerous environment

(25:53):
even for those who are living here peacefully, although illegally,
living peacefully for the most part, not violating any crimes.
We have criminal element from outside the states praying upon
that the people within those communities are actually here illegally
as well. So that's a very big circle. That really

(26:13):
was law enforcement we try to intervene in. And for
those pushing that legislation, they don't understand the street level
crime that takes place, and so that's what we as
law enforcement have to deal with. And that's one of
the subject matters I'll be testifying to well.

Speaker 1 (26:27):
And before I go to the next subject, I want
to ask you about now how much money did you
get from the Russians?

Speaker 3 (26:34):
How much money did I get from the Russians?

Speaker 1 (26:36):
Yeah, the Russians have been paying people to say things
like what you're saying right now. I heard that. I
heard Mark Garland say that the Russians have been paying
people to say conservative things like that. Is this wondering
because I didn't know I could get money for saying
these things? Say?

Speaker 3 (26:51):
Yeah, you know, those stories are kind of funny. And
how to even really put truth to fact is always
so difficult, and I really try to make sure that
we have the evidence in facts. But the reality of
it is is that the American people have been fooled
and lied to law enforcement is the friend Anyone who
is supporting defunding the police, obviously is not a friend

(27:13):
of public safety and much of that which is occurring
across the United States, and of which the reason I
stood up so hard against Kamala Harris, which has caught
a lot of attention lately, is because I've been to
the border. I've seen people come across the border. I've
seen people from other countries who don't like us, who
want to kill us, coming in freely across those borders.

(27:37):
Now For me, I live in the central San Joaquin Valley.
I really believe we should be working with Mexico, working
with the Mexican nationals, working with the Mexican government to
make a partnership between Mexico and the United States. I'm
not saying that we circumvent any laws that we have,
but to be honest with you, Mexico is our ally.
Mexico is not our enemy, but the reason need that

(28:00):
strong and secure border is Carkels are our enemy, human
traffickers are our enemy, drug lords, but most importantly those
people in other countries like Syria, Iraq, Iran, different countries
who view the United States as the second Israel and
have openly said that once they're done with Israel, America

(28:20):
is next. So how can when we receive information from
some of our intelligence officers that say it's not a
matter of if it's win, another terence to tackle take place?
And so why I stand so strongly against Kamala Harris
is she's the Vice President of the United States and
she knows that it's a matter of win, not if

(28:40):
a matter of win, and still allows our borders to
be open the way that they are really jeopardizes the
safety of everyone who lives here, including those who are
here illegally.

Speaker 1 (28:52):
And when she was Attorney general and when she was
the attorney in San Francisco, she was letting them out.
They were killing people. She's and I and again, you know,
we have to pick on you because she put your
picture a picture of her with with sheriff, and you
are one of them. And I know you were not
any part of that, but you know, you get pictures

(29:14):
taken with a lot of people never know what they're
going to end up pretty crazy. But what okay? So
Proposition thirty six. So the legislature hates Proposition thirty six,
which is undoing partially forty seven and is going to
change how law enforcement works. But so the legislature put

(29:35):
together their ten bills to try to stop us from
passing Proposition thirty six. And remember that the same legislature
was the ones that we're saying, you know, can't we
just find a way other than putting people in jail
to help their lives? And jail is just such a
harsh thing to do. Tell me what's in prop thirty

(29:58):
six that we need and why we need it? After
these ten wonderful new laws are going to be signed
by Newsom.

Speaker 3 (30:04):
Well, Proposition thirty six, quite frankly takes it back to
the voter to bring accountability back to our justice system,
and Proposition forty seven as well as fifty seven, of
which Kamala Harris and Governor Newsom were architects in the
design and helped spearhead that pushing forward, and the one
of the reasons they were doing is to reduce the
numbers in our state prison system. Having said that they

(30:28):
fooled the California voter in Proposition forty seven talking about
rehabilitation social services and that these crimes that are non serious,
such as non serious, non sexual, and non violent, really
need to be better served with social services and or
early intervention. The problem that I have with much of

(30:49):
that is every jail in the state of California, every shariff,
all fifty eight counties, has rehabilitation programs, training programs, education programs.
People able to get their GEDs. We actually teach welding
and core services for the blue collar type worker. We
teach them ag and farming. So when you go into

(31:12):
jail in times past, you were able to receive mental
health counseling. Alcoholic anonymous narcotics, anonymous. They removed all of that,
so we don't have people coming through our jail who
really need help, and quite frankly, some people have to
be forced to get help. Under forty seven, it was
more of the idea that if you want help, live free,

(31:35):
you go get help if you think you need it,
and we'll put more money towards these other services. That
has never come together. And what we're finding is is
these retail thefts people not being held accountable. The criminal
element who knows that they're not going to be held
accountable continue to commit these egregious thefts all up and
down the state of California, bleeding into the idea of

(31:58):
violent crime that's taking place. And we have lost our
moral compass in regards to people understanding that if you
commit a crime, you will be held accountable, you will
do jail time. Now, look, I as a sheriff, I'm
all supportive of rehabilitation, but you got to do your accountability.
You have to do your time in jail, and while

(32:18):
in jail you can receive rehabilitation, and even after release
from jail, it would be nice to have social services
or some other programs where people can rehabilitate. I get that,
but we can't fix the problem that someone has taken
eighteen years to get to and try to force them
into rehabilitation after they've already committed the crime. It's backwards.

(32:42):
And so what Proposition thirty six does is put the
hands of accountability back into the citizens of California.

Speaker 2 (32:48):
They insist that Trevor Cherry Show Mondo Valley's Powers.

Speaker 1 (32:51):
Dog, Trevor's gandinga a much needed break. I usually do
my show on Saturday, which I still will from noon
until one tomorrow, but filling for Trevor, and I do
want to invite you all. Actually I don't want to
invite you. John Dolislager wants to invite you to come
out to the Trump Train rally tomorrow on Avenue three
zero four and Rode eighty near Daanuba at noon, so

(33:15):
you can drive to Madera on Avenue eleven to show
support our value support for conservative causes. So please come
on out and after the break today, I'm going to
be talking about real estate issues as well as the
Harris economic plan. If Kamala Harris actually has an economic plan,

(33:36):
I'm going to try to piece it together for you.
Based on what I know. You see her her campaign
puts out something and they say this is the economic plan,
and then it gets shot down by economists and she says,
that wasn't my plan. They were just saying that it
didn't really happen. But we have a good idea of
the things that she does say and what she has
supported in the past, and we're to talk about what

(33:58):
that economic plan means to you. What it means to
the cost of your gasoline, the cost of your electricity,
the cost of your housing, what it means to all
of the things that you do based on the Harris
economic plan, if she actually has one. And by the way,
Comrade Harris, I like that, you know, I call almost

(34:18):
all Californians comrade. Comrade Harris says she does have a plan,
she just doesn't know what it is right now. But
she is studying. She's going to be studying all week
for what her plan is, because next week she's going
to have that debate with Trump, and she promises by
the time she debates Trump, she's going to know what
her economic plan is. And she's really disappointed because she

(34:39):
doesn't get to have notes to remind her what her
economic plan is, but she's got it, she'll have it down.
And I understand she has a binder that she's using,
so she can use that binder to study, but she
can't have it. And then we're wondering what Geene Pierre
is going to do If if Kamala has the binder,
then who's going to know what's going on at the

(35:01):
White House. It's it's it's gonna be rough.

Speaker 2 (35:03):
This is the Trevor Carry Show on the Valley's Power
Talk