Dr. Wendy is offering her Wendy wisdom with her drive by makeshift relationship advice. PLUS we are talking to Dr. Paul Eastwick of Love Factually about what rom-coms got right and what they didn't. It's all on KFIAM-640!
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is doctor Wendy Walsh and you're listening to KFI
AM six forty, the Doctor Wendy Walls Show on demand
on the iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
App KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
You've got doctor Wendy Walsh with you. This is the
Doctor Wendy Wall Show. I'm taking your calls. The numbers one,
eight hundred five to zero one KFI one eight hundred
five to zero, one, five.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
Three four. Okay, Producer Kayla, who do we have next?
We have Fred with a question. Fred. Hi, Fred, It's
doctor Wendy.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Hello, good evening.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
What's your question.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
I'm gone, I got a crazy question for you. I
would like to know. I would like to hear your
opinion on this.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
I'm sixty one and forty years ago. In nineteen eighty five, Yeah,
there was a girl. I knew her and she's one
year exactly, one year younger than me. I knew her,
but we started dating and we never we never had sex, okay,
but we dated for about four months. I was working
(00:59):
out Colorado, so.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
You were twenty one and she was twenty with the
last time you did.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
Twenty okay, Yeah, it's been that long, and I we
I remember taking her home in my truck. Anyway, I
told her, I said, okay, I guess this is where
we shake hands good night, And she said, uh uh,
so we kissed good night. But at that point my
head exploded and there were fireworks over my head and
(01:27):
stars and all kinds of stuff.
Speaker 1 (01:28):
Don't you love those neuro hormones? How exciting, Fred?
Speaker 3 (01:32):
All the planets were perfectly lined up, and what happened
I was just well, I came back here to La
to work.
Speaker 4 (01:39):
I was working.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
I got a real good job out here, you know
about So.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
After one kiss you'll you'll laughter.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
I had to come out here and work. We were
too young. She lived with her parents and there was
no way she could you know. It's it took me
three years to buy my house and then I took So.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Let me get you recently looked her up online?
Speaker 3 (02:02):
No, no, I recently was working in Denver, and out
of the blue I ran into her.
Speaker 2 (02:09):
Oh did she remember you?
Speaker 4 (02:11):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Yeah? Yeah?
Speaker 3 (02:12):
Oh yeah?
Speaker 2 (02:14):
And is she married?
Speaker 4 (02:16):
Right?
Speaker 3 (02:16):
No? No, she's asailable, she's just as beautiful as ever
as anyways, you know, she's she went through a bad relationship,
so she's you know, she's really sketchy. About, you know,
so she should be. I mean, but well, we talk
every day, you know now on the phone, and I'm
gonna go see you in about a month. I'm gonna
(02:38):
drive back up there, and I got a load going
up there in my truck. I'm a fear but I'm
just thinking. I know, I've never been married, and I
feel like I ruined my life because I was always
searching for that and other women. And I mean, I've daved,
I've had a couple of serious relationships, but I never
ever felt that again. And I'm wondering, is that like
(03:01):
that normal?
Speaker 1 (03:02):
Okay, So there's no such thing as normal when it
comes to love, Fred, What your experience is something called
retro sexual attraction, meaning that at the very beginning of
our life, when we have our first love, the attack
of hormones on our brain is so exciting that it
lingers for decades.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
People literally, if you ask anybody.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Over the age of fifty sixty seventy about their first love,
you will watch their face light up. You will see
them go into the story of what it was like.
You've had the opportunity of running into her again. Now,
my biggest concern, Fred, is what happened between then and
now to you that you were turned off relationships and
(03:46):
love for forty years and then all of a sudden
it's opened up to you. I mean, we can't judge
the timing, but I just want to make sure that
you don't have kind of an attachment issue and that
you might accidentally, without your own knowledge or permission, do
something to mess this up. And that's why I always say,
(04:06):
you know, get a therapist. You got a wingman who
can help you explore your feelings. And the other thing, Fred,
move slowly. You already said she's skittish, she's been in
a bad relationship, right, So move very very slowly. There's
no rush, there's no rush for rush to physically touch,
there's no rush for sex. Just go there and enjoy
(04:30):
touching base with somebody from another era of your life.
I'm sure you have a lot of people to talk
about from way back. Whatever happened to so and so?
Do you know what happened to Sow and Zoe?
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Right, and just enjoy.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
Each other's company. But the more you create anxiety about this,
the worse it'll be for you. So keep it light,
have some fun, and call me back and let me
know how it goes, Fred, I'm very excited to hear.
Oh my god, that's so cute. I'm rooting for them.
I really am rooting for them. Dear Doc, Wendy. I'm
going to social now. I am dating someone and there
(05:03):
is a cultural difference. I understand Americans care about how
friendly someone is, but other cultures can be a little
to the point, I can't tell if my guy is
being rude to me or if it's a cultural difference.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
How do I explore this?
Speaker 1 (05:22):
You ask or you explain what that feels like from
your culture. So if they say something that feels a
little rude to you, then all you say is, hey,
that felt very like you're criticizing me. And I'm not
sure if you're joking or whether that's your culture, because
(05:43):
in my culture, we don't talk like that to somebody
we care about. So I'm curious to know how it's
what your intention was. It's always a good idea to
ask somebody what was your intention there? What did you
mean by that? Because here's what the experience was to me. Right,
That's all you need to do is just address it,
(06:03):
and that's how we all learn to get along. I'll
answer one real quick, because then we got to go,
how long do I date someone before telling them I
have an autoimmune disease? You know what this is like
the person who had the trauma early in life with
their straining order. You don't date for very long, but
you also don't tell them on the first phone call
(06:24):
or the first coffee date. All right, you don't let
it go on where they start falling in love with
you and then blah blah blah blah blah. Right, I
would say, you know, as you start to build intimacy
and trust and you see it's reciprocal, they're opening up
to you, that's the time to explain this stuff, all right.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
When we come back.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
The new thing interpersonal intelligence versus intra personal intelligence. I'll
explain the difference when we come back. You're listening to
the Doctor Wendy Walls Show on KFI AM six forty
Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 5 (06:57):
You're listening to Doctor Wendy Walsh on demand from KFI
AM six forty Welcome.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
Back to the Doctor Wendywall Show on KFI AM six
forty Live everywhere on.
Speaker 2 (07:08):
The iHeartRadio app. Can we talk.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
About your interpersonal intelligence. You know, that's very different from
your intra personal intelligence. Actually, I teach a class on intelligence,
and I always tell the students that some other are
going to get this wrong on the exam. The definitions
intra means insight inside yourself, being aware of your own feelings,
(07:32):
being authentic, being able to have some emotional intelligence about
managing your own feelings, expressing your feelings to other But
inter personal intelligence is now becoming very in vogue. So
maybe one time, maybe your partner somebody you're with, gave
(07:53):
you really unhelpful advice. You know, when people say things like, well,
things are going to get better or you'll get over it,
and you're really not in the mood to hear these things.
In fact, when they say that kind of stuff, it
makes you feel worse. And on top of it, your
partner doesn't even understand why you need help. I don't
understand why it's such a big deal. You're making a
(08:15):
mountain out of a mole hill. That's what people say,
right well, according to a new study at the University
of California, Santa Barbara, the world of emotion regulation research
is actually undergoing a big shift. We are moving away
from intra personal meaning emotions within yourself to interpersonal getting
(08:36):
some help from someone else.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
You know.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
I like to say that a healthy relationship is interdependent.
You don't want two people who are too independent. You
don't want people who are too dependent on each other.
You want people who are healthfully interdependent, taking turns leaning
on each other's shoulders. So researchers at the University of
California Santa Barbara say, but obviously, couples who have higher
(09:01):
emotional intimacy with each other are better at regulating each
other's emotions because love helps you become more motivated to
calm your partner down, to reset their mood.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
So the way they did this study is.
Speaker 1 (09:14):
Really interesting is they would read these vignettes about life
to people the participants, and some were positive, some were negative,
and then for each one they would say, okay, so
here's eight different emotions. Words for emotions you know, might
be proud, excited, guilty, angry, afraid. At which emotion do
you think the person is going to experience when.
Speaker 2 (09:37):
This happens to them?
Speaker 1 (09:38):
And then they ask the partner, if this happened to
you and you were feeling bad, what would you like
to hear your partner say right, And so here's an example.
Like they're very kind of vague and could be interpreted
in any way. So here's one from the study. The
riskwatch I inherited from my great grandfather stopped working this morning.
(10:00):
Repair said there's no.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
Way to fix it. It was so old.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
I hardly used it. I know it's just an object,
but it's been in my family for ages. I wish
there was a way to get it working again. I
will stay right here. There's going to be a gender
divide in the answers. If the person reading this is
a female, the dude's going to want to find a
way to fix it.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
I'm guys like to fix problems.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
They think the answer is fixing, but instead the researchers
say what emotion do you think your partner will experience?
Of course they're also asking the partner privately, what would
this do to you? Write this feeling? And then what
would you say to them to help them feel better?
And then they asked the partner what would you like,
not in front of them, what would you like? So
(10:40):
what they found out is that people who have better
Now I'm going to use that word again, intra personal. Sorry, Yeah,
intra personal intelligence, meaning they have can sense their own feelings,
They know that feeling in their stomach, and they have
a word for it. They tend to be more empathetic
and be more accurate in guessing their partner's emotions. Also,
(11:05):
I'm surprised to have to say this, people have an
avoidant attachment style. We're really clueless about how to help
their partners. But here's the big news. Empathy isn't a
trait you're born with. Yes, to some degree, some people
are higher they're more empathetic than others. But it is
also a skill that can be cultivated and strengthened. And
(11:27):
there's all kinds of things you can do that are
backed by science. Number one, taking someone else's perspective, literally
walking in someone's shoes when something else is going on,
asking yourself, hmm, what would it.
Speaker 2 (11:42):
Be like if I were them? What would it like?
Speaker 1 (11:46):
Literally asking that question all the time, imagining the other
person's point of view. You can actually hone a skill
and a practice to have more empathy by just constantly
asking yourself, huh, what would it feel like to be them?
Speaker 2 (12:01):
Right now?
Speaker 1 (12:02):
There's also research to support the idea that mindfulness met
meditation improves emotional regulation and even attunement to other people's emotions.
This one study that was published in Psychological Science found
that just two weeks of practicing loving kindness meditation increase
(12:23):
brain activity in areas associated with empathy. See here's the thing.
When you're meditating, you're hopefully told to allow anything, respect it,
love it, love yourself, love others. Just breathe, just relax,
let the feelings come. It's everything's okay. Non judgmental awareness
of our feelings, and that helps us have empathy for others.
(12:46):
Here's one of my favorites. If you're somebody who only
reads nonfiction, get off that junk. You need to read
literary fiction. Or you have complex characters and they have
a whole stream of different emotions, right, this will help
you understand other people's thoughts and emotions. Literally, just reading
(13:07):
more good literary fiction will increase your emotional intelligence. And finally,
just spending more time with people from different backgrounds, okay,
whether it's different races, different genders, different ages, different origins,
countries of origin, just to understand their perspectives, people with
(13:29):
different political views, people with different religious views. Just spending
time asking questions not being rude, not rudely criticizing, but
understand trying to understand their perspective. This can open up
your mind. And here's the best news of all. Our
brain is plastic brain. Plasticity is on your side. Empathy
(13:51):
is linked to neurocircuits involving what's called the mirror neur neurons, sorry,
the mirror neuron system. And this will actually grow. I
like to say a lot of these behaviors, if you
continue to do them, will grow new super highways, new lanes,
new offshoots. It's called intentional repetition. So simply put, if
(14:14):
you practice empathy, you can literally rewire your brain for it.
And this is what you need to have a healthy relationship. Hey,
we come back. I have a very special guest. I'm
so excited to have him on the show. He's the
co host of the podcast called Love Factually, and he's
(14:36):
a researcher in interpersonal relationships and he's got some interesting
things to say about love. You're listening to the Dr
Wendy wall Show on KFI AM six forty. We're live
everywhere in the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 5 (14:50):
You're listening to Doctor Wendy Walsh on demand from KFI
AM six forty.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Welcome back to the Doctor Wendy Wall Show on KFI
AMCIX live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. Now, I'm about
to fan girl again. You know I do this every
once in a while, I get somebody on the show
who I'm actually a big fan of. And this week's
guest is doctor Paul Eastwick. He's a professor at UC Davis.
(15:17):
But get this, he runs a lab where he does
research on all my favorite subjects, attraction relationships. But also
he's cool because he's co hosting the podcast Love Factually,
of course, available on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 4 (15:33):
This is Love Factually, the podcast that analyzes rom coms
and romantic films using the science of close relationships.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
So as want to be film critics, We're going to
meet the people where they are.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
This podcast is about what the movies get right and
wrong about how relationships actually were.
Speaker 2 (15:51):
Hi, doctor Paul, how are you?
Speaker 4 (15:54):
Hi?
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Very goodness?
Speaker 4 (15:56):
Thanks someone for having me on today.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
You didn't know that i'mould be fangirl on you on
live radio.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
Yeah right right, Okay, I'm ready. I'll see if I.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
Can live up to them.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
Okay, So what I want to talk about We don't
have a whole lot of time, but what I like
to talk about is your mate evaluation theory. But before
we do that, I need to know the story behind
Love Factually. It is such a brilliant title for your podcast.
What is the podcast Love Factually?
Speaker 4 (16:25):
And yes, So the basic idea behind the podcast is,
along with my longtime collaborator and now co host, Eli Finkle,
we take the science of close relationships is we have
understood it and internalized it over the years, and what
we do is we talk about how various rom coms
and romantic films reflect what we know in the science,
(16:49):
either what the films are getting right or what they're
kind of mangling.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
Well, I'm going to tell you that I have always
said what they get wrong pretty much one hundred percent
of them is that they they end at the beginning
of a relationship.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
That is is a fantastic point. There's so many of
those films that classically do that right. You get what
you're doing, You're seeing what amounts to something like the
first ten percent of the relationship, and that's part is
supposed to make it feel good and like say, send
you home feeling happy and look sometimes they depict that
(17:27):
early ten percent. Well, but we've got to acknowledge that
there's a lot left to come when the movies end,
when the couple gets together, right and.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
They get past their limerins and move into intellectual commitment
kind of love.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (17:43):
Now, we've covered plenty of movies that do cover the
whole art. It's actually kind of tough if we want
to give the movies a break. It's tough to go
from beginning all the way to the end. Right, Are
there any la Land is one that does it really well?
Speaker 3 (17:59):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (17:59):
I mean also the Notebook, Come on.
Speaker 4 (18:02):
The note right right, That is one of the view
that goes from the beginning to end. Really the end
the spoiler alertly yeah, really the end literally the Notebook. Yeah.
But but they're out there, and and we like to give,
you know, you know, accolades to those movies that pull
(18:23):
it off.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
So moving from the podcast onto some of your research.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
One of your most famous studies has to do with
something called mate evaluation theory, and it basically talks about
how people analyze, evaluate, make selection for potential mates.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
And and I read the.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
Whole study today because what I do is I turn
it into language everyone can understand. And now I'm going
to have you correct me if I say it wrong.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
I'm ready, I'm ready.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
There are basically five ways that people evaluate a mate. Right, First,
you talk about something called shared evolved mechanisms.
Speaker 2 (19:05):
And cultural scripts.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
Is this David Buss's evolutionary stuff. I'm hearing that women
like men who are tall, and men like women who
are fertile and roundt Yeah, really.
Speaker 4 (19:20):
It is is definitely meant to encompass that. Right. So
anything that's like agreed upon, whether the reason for agreement
is there something evolved in the mind that this is
appealing to who we are as a species on average,
or because I don't know, we've decided in this culture
that you know, it's appealing if you can like make
(19:42):
really great TikTok videos like actually.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Right, this is attractive.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
I mean, I will say, I'm a woman of a
certain age, and I've watched female body shape change over
the years, and in the nineteen eighties it was the
advent of the boob job, and it was very exciting
to suddenly see breasts on every and now it's all
about but right, So that's one example of a cultural script.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
All right, moving on number.
Speaker 1 (20:09):
Two individual differences that affect how a perceiver. That's somebody
who's attracted to somebody views all potential mates. So is
this like somebody's deal breaker list, Like this is my checklist,
these are things I'm looking for.
Speaker 4 (20:23):
I would think of this one as like this is
like people's own personality. So some people are happy people,
and honestly, they're going to be happy in whatever relationship
you put them in. And some people they're not so
much and they're going to be kind of miserable in
whatever relationship you put them in. So that's this component.
It's kind of like is your lens that you take
(20:46):
to the whole world and it doesn't matter who you're with.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
Interesting because my new husband, Julio, he is a giggly
Dominican and he's the happiest person.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
I've ever met in my life.
Speaker 4 (20:59):
There you go.
Speaker 1 (21:00):
Then I'm met his whole family in Dominican Republic and
they all giggle. I was like, Wow, it's a cultural thing.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
This is cool. Yep, so happy with anybody, even me.
Speaker 4 (21:11):
Yeah, there you go, and like, look, don't feel bad.
It's a really good good thing to be to have
a little bit of some rose colored glasses.
Speaker 3 (21:21):
As you view the boy.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
Oh yes, I have to reel him back in all
the time, as his optimism.
Speaker 2 (21:26):
Is a little too high. Uh okay, moving on to
the third one.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
Individual differences that affect how a perceiver views some targets
depending on the target's feature.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
So let me take a crack at this. Yeah, so
would this be correct?
Speaker 1 (21:41):
Maybe somebody with an anxious attachment style might look at
a partner's emotional passion and intensity as being really attractive.
But if that person looking is avoidant, they might feel smothered.
Speaker 4 (21:58):
That's a great example. Yeah, I mean this also would
encompass the deal breaker list you mentioned earlier, the idea
that that I, like, I can't stand people who you know,
like going to fancy seven course meal restaurants, Like I
just can't be with somebody like that, Like that is,
you know, too high falutant for me. If you have
(22:20):
that kind of deal breaker, that's this third one that
you're talking about.
Speaker 2 (22:23):
Not yourself. Do not invite Paul to dinner? Okay, gotcha?
Speaker 1 (22:29):
All right, we have to go to we have to
go to rat Okay, when we come back there two
more as part of your made evaluation theory. And then
I want to talk about what this made evaluation theory
can teach.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
Us about dating. Okay, we'll be right back.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
You are listening to the Doctor Wendy Wall Show on
kf I AM six forty Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 5 (22:50):
You're listening to doctor Wendy Walsh on demand from KFI
AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
Welcome back to the Doctor Wendy Wall Show.
Speaker 1 (22:57):
I'm KFI AM six forty Live every where on the
iHeartRadio app. My guest is University of California Davis Professor,
doctor Paul Eastwick. He is also a researcher in attraction, relationships,
interpersonal love, sex, the whole shabang. He has the numbers
and the data on it. Okay, doctor Paul, your mate
(23:19):
evaluation theory, how people evaluate mates to be a potential mate,
You say narratives about idiosyncratic reactions to one particular target. Now,
I just got to admonish you on that is some
psychobabble there.
Speaker 3 (23:33):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (23:33):
I had to think about that for a minute.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Okay, So I would say this is like, I think
this is the exciting part because this is does this
mean that if you like have this sense that there's
great meaning to this relationship to you in particular, I
don't know, like there's something about this person that makes
(23:55):
you go, oh, it's meant to be.
Speaker 2 (23:56):
It feels magical.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
Yes. And also about the things that you construct along
the way. And this is the one that I think
is if you ask the average person what is important
in your relationship, they're gonna ultimately gravitate towards these kinds
of things. The special rituals we have, the pet names
(24:19):
we have for each other, the customers that we build,
the values that we've created over time. And this stuff
is huge.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
True.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
This is as a couple creating, or what an individual
creates in their life and then says, wow, this person
fits that.
Speaker 4 (24:36):
It is really supposed to be what you are creating.
I'll say, like this where you're creating the con in
a context with this particular person. And the real idea
with this one is the idea that, like, I can't
just take somebody else who like looks a up like
your partner and substitute them in. Like, the point is
that this person was there along the way for the
(24:58):
creation of these things, Like you have memory with this person,
and that's that's what it's really about.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
And I always say relationships are a living thing. They're
like growing a gardener together. And having been prior to
meeting my now husband, I was a single mom for
twenty years with two little girls, and I did not
want to risk exposing my kids to a poor romantic
choice that I might make. But I knew that if
(25:24):
I kept studying this stuff, by the time they got
of age and old enough, I would find my person.
But there is something now that I'm in a secure
attachment where I really feel like there's a living thing.
Like we're co thinkers, we're co emotional.
Speaker 4 (25:41):
You know.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
He does half the thinking, you know, and I do
half the intellectual work. I mean, a great example, here's
a simple, simple example, and I'm sure many couples do this.
One of us will be working on an email and
we will read it aloud to the other person. It
might be an important email, and he will add more
business language or analytically language to mine, and I will
(26:02):
add more emotional language.
Speaker 4 (26:04):
To Yep, we get emois in there had an exclamation point.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
Exactly. Now're a team. We're thinking like one brain exactly.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
Yeah, yeah, right, And it's this thing that people build
together that you know, what we try to point out
in this paper is we all kind of intuitively get
that this is really important, and we as researchers are
actually not great at capturing it. And that's for a
bunch of methodological reasons that aren't especially fascinating. But the
(26:36):
bottom line is what we think the lion's share of
compatibility is how well you create a culture to your relationship. Well,
we actually just haven't. Uh, you know, there's a lot
out there about that that still needs to be explored
and understood.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
And just so that people understand what you just said,
one of the problems with doing relationship research is a
lot of it is self reporting. You can't like put
people in MRI machines and just say.
Speaker 2 (27:04):
Oh, there's love, although some attachment.
Speaker 4 (27:06):
Researchers are doing that right right right.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
Okay, So let's go to what made evaluation theory can
teach us about dating. Now that we know these points, what,
how does that help us make better decisions?
Speaker 4 (27:21):
Well, I think where it can really help people is
to recognize that there's some amount of curiosity that is
important when it comes to being in a relationship with somebody.
It's curiosity about how did we get to this point
and are the patterns we set up early in our
relationships still serving us. Well. You know, one of the
(27:44):
challenges that often happens is that, you know, couples do
things because they work right, and they keep those things
going because they were effective at one time. But it
can be very easy for one or both couple members
to lose track of what their needs are as they
change over time, and to realize that the patterns they've
set up might actually now be getting in the way,
(28:06):
might equally even be stifling one of them. And so,
you know, I'm a big believer that you know that
many couples can make it work, but it does require
some amount of curiosity about what the other person is
experiencing and how did we get here? Do we need
(28:27):
to mix things up or not right?
Speaker 2 (28:29):
I call it rewriting the relationship contract.
Speaker 3 (28:32):
From time to time. Yeah, there you go.
Speaker 1 (28:34):
And also when it comes to choosing you mate, looking
at some of these cultural scripts is a good idea
for us to become aware of them and realize how
they could be limiting us.
Speaker 4 (28:46):
Yes, I mean, I'm a big believer in the idea
that actually the narratives that you co create with somebody
really begin from the first moment. Like a lot of times,
what we think we're trying to do is assess things
like how how good are you know this person's traits?
Are they attractive, are they intelligent? Are they funny? But
(29:07):
we're really doing is trying to figure out are they
funny with me?
Speaker 5 (29:12):
Right?
Speaker 4 (29:13):
Do they seem smart with me? Do they make me
feel smart? Like it's relational from the very first few minutes.
I mean, we even see this if you look at
you know, first impression research, and we've collected a lot
of data on first impressions. But what people are trying
to do is just find something where they both have
(29:34):
a little bit of knowledge in common, and they can
kind of try to start scaffolding something together, something that
they have in common, something that they can sort of
bond over a little bit, and then you sort of
build up from there. So you know, everything is a construction,
and it really happens from the very beginning.
Speaker 1 (29:52):
So when I met my husband during COVID, during quarantine
and lockdown, my role was they had to meet me
on a windy pier wearing a mask. Okay, and if
they couldn't do that, then if they want to protect
my health, it's not going to happen. And then when
we sat down for I only do coffee day, so
it was only twenty minutes they got you got to
leave them wanting more, you know. And then I said,
(30:13):
when we sat down, I said, look, you know, we
could sit here and brag about the masks were off
at this point because we were more than six feet
apart and the wind was going. Yeah, and I said,
we could sit here and brag about how great we
are and how datable we are. But could we begin
actually by each of us telling a story of why
we think we're completely undateable.
Speaker 4 (30:32):
Oh that's wonderful, he said.
Speaker 2 (30:35):
Okay, you'll go first.
Speaker 1 (30:40):
Good, and he had a much much more tragic story
than I did, but it developed intimacy from the get go.
Speaker 4 (30:48):
Yep, right, it was that's great. Yeah, I spot on.
I love to plug urt eron. And you know the
grade thirty six questions. Oh yes, studying, Yeah, I mean
right exactly. But really, what you're doing in that sixty
to ninety minute period is you are getting comfortable and
then talking about things that are interesting and deep and meaningful.
(31:10):
And people can do this in short periods of time.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
Oh yeah, and within ten minutes of our coffee coming,
both of us had our eyes welling up with tears
over our stories. Yeah, and dealing with the shame of
having to tell the story too right. And so I
wanted to ask you one more question before time is
so tight and Radio I'm sorry. The last question has
(31:34):
to do when it comes to this study with these
sort of these models we have in our heads for
what we're talking specifically heterrich sexual relations. Here, for my example,
an opposite gender parents' role is in our model of love. So,
for instance, with my husband, we will be out shopping
(31:55):
somewhere and he'll be in the next aisle over and
he will clear his throat one hundred percent it is
my dad. Everything about the sound, the tone and everything,
And I almost get startled when I hear it. Did
I unconsciously choose him partly because of that? Oh?
Speaker 4 (32:13):
I don't know. I mean there is a little bit
of work showing that, Yeah, that people can be unconsciously
primed with images of parents, and you know, they feel
a little bit more safe. And so maybe that you know,
is coming from somebody of your you know, preferred age
and gender that you just find yourself a little bit
more attractive with that person for that reason. But this
(32:35):
stuff is going to be really really subtle. Yeah, any
unconscious effects are going to be very very small on
the whole. But it's possible that you know, things like
like what you mentioned there, uh, sort of the way
that he clears his throughout might might be a small
thing that carried over from those unconscious leanings.
Speaker 1 (32:56):
Which might have been important to me and my trauma
is that my parents both died of cancer in the
same year when I was young, and so interesting enough,
his mother, who's eighty six years old, I.
Speaker 2 (33:07):
Love, so I got a dad and a mom back
with this marriage.
Speaker 4 (33:09):
Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah, right right, quite sure.
Speaker 1 (33:13):
Yeah, Paul, it is a delight to have you on
the Doctor Wendy Wall Show here on KFI. We are
going to have your co host, Eli Finkel next week,
I believe, so we'll make sure that we cover love
factually as much as we can. Thanks so much for
being with us. My guest is doctor Paul Eastwick, a
professor at the University of California Davis. You've been listening
(33:34):
to The Doctor Wendy Wall Show on KFI AM six forty.
We're live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. You've been listening
to Doctor Wendy Waals. You can always hear us live
on KFI Am six forty from seven to nine pm
on Sunday and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
This is doctor Wendy Walsh and you're listening to KFI
AM six forty, the Doctor Wendy Walls Show on demand
on the iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
App KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
You've got doctor Wendy Walsh with you. This is the
Doctor Wendy Wall Show. I'm taking your calls. The numbers one,
eight hundred five to zero one KFI one eight hundred
five to zero, one, five.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
Three four. Okay, Producer Kayla, who do we have next?
We have Fred with a question. Fred. Hi, Fred, It's
doctor Wendy.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Hello, good evening.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
What's your question.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
I'm gone, I got a crazy question for you. I
would like to know. I would like to hear your
opinion on this.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
I'm sixty one and forty years ago. In nineteen eighty five, Yeah,
there was a girl. I knew her and she's one
year exactly, one year younger than me. I knew her,
but we started dating and we never we never had sex, okay,
but we dated for about four months. I was working
(00:59):
out Colorado, so.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
You were twenty one and she was twenty with the
last time you did.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
Twenty okay, Yeah, it's been that long, and I we
I remember taking her home in my truck. Anyway, I
told her, I said, okay, I guess this is where
we shake hands good night, And she said, uh uh,
so we kissed good night. But at that point my
head exploded and there were fireworks over my head and
(01:27):
stars and all kinds of stuff.
Speaker 1 (01:28):
Don't you love those neuro hormones? How exciting, Fred?
Speaker 3 (01:32):
All the planets were perfectly lined up, and what happened
I was just well, I came back here to La
to work.
Speaker 4 (01:39):
I was working.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
I got a real good job out here, you know
about So.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
After one kiss you'll you'll laughter.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
I had to come out here and work. We were
too young. She lived with her parents and there was
no way she could you know. It's it took me
three years to buy my house and then I took So.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Let me get you recently looked her up online?
Speaker 3 (02:02):
No, no, I recently was working in Denver, and out
of the blue I ran into her.
Speaker 2 (02:09):
Oh did she remember you?
Speaker 4 (02:11):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Yeah? Yeah?
Speaker 3 (02:12):
Oh yeah?
Speaker 2 (02:14):
And is she married?
Speaker 4 (02:16):
Right?
Speaker 3 (02:16):
No? No, she's asailable, she's just as beautiful as ever
as anyways, you know, she's she went through a bad relationship,
so she's you know, she's really sketchy. About, you know,
so she should be. I mean, but well, we talk
every day, you know now on the phone, and I'm
gonna go see you in about a month. I'm gonna
(02:38):
drive back up there, and I got a load going
up there in my truck. I'm a fear but I'm
just thinking. I know, I've never been married, and I
feel like I ruined my life because I was always
searching for that and other women. And I mean, I've daved,
I've had a couple of serious relationships, but I never
ever felt that again. And I'm wondering, is that like
(03:01):
that normal?
Speaker 1 (03:02):
Okay, So there's no such thing as normal when it
comes to love, Fred, What your experience is something called
retro sexual attraction, meaning that at the very beginning of
our life, when we have our first love, the attack
of hormones on our brain is so exciting that it
lingers for decades.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
People literally, if you ask anybody.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Over the age of fifty sixty seventy about their first love,
you will watch their face light up. You will see
them go into the story of what it was like.
You've had the opportunity of running into her again. Now,
my biggest concern, Fred, is what happened between then and
now to you that you were turned off relationships and
(03:46):
love for forty years and then all of a sudden
it's opened up to you. I mean, we can't judge
the timing, but I just want to make sure that
you don't have kind of an attachment issue and that
you might accidentally, without your own knowledge or permission, do
something to mess this up. And that's why I always say,
(04:06):
you know, get a therapist. You got a wingman who
can help you explore your feelings. And the other thing, Fred,
move slowly. You already said she's skittish, she's been in
a bad relationship, right, So move very very slowly. There's
no rush, there's no rush for rush to physically touch,
there's no rush for sex. Just go there and enjoy
(04:30):
touching base with somebody from another era of your life.
I'm sure you have a lot of people to talk
about from way back. Whatever happened to so and so?
Do you know what happened to Sow and Zoe?
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Right, and just enjoy.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
Each other's company. But the more you create anxiety about this,
the worse it'll be for you. So keep it light,
have some fun, and call me back and let me
know how it goes, Fred, I'm very excited to hear.
Oh my god, that's so cute. I'm rooting for them.
I really am rooting for them. Dear Doc, Wendy. I'm
going to social now. I am dating someone and there
(05:03):
is a cultural difference. I understand Americans care about how
friendly someone is, but other cultures can be a little
to the point, I can't tell if my guy is
being rude to me or if it's a cultural difference.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
How do I explore this?
Speaker 1 (05:22):
You ask or you explain what that feels like from
your culture. So if they say something that feels a
little rude to you, then all you say is, hey,
that felt very like you're criticizing me. And I'm not
sure if you're joking or whether that's your culture, because
(05:43):
in my culture, we don't talk like that to somebody
we care about. So I'm curious to know how it's
what your intention was. It's always a good idea to
ask somebody what was your intention there? What did you
mean by that? Because here's what the experience was to me. Right,
That's all you need to do is just address it,
(06:03):
and that's how we all learn to get along. I'll
answer one real quick, because then we got to go,
how long do I date someone before telling them I
have an autoimmune disease? You know what this is like
the person who had the trauma early in life with
their straining order. You don't date for very long, but
you also don't tell them on the first phone call
(06:24):
or the first coffee date. All right, you don't let
it go on where they start falling in love with
you and then blah blah blah blah blah. Right, I
would say, you know, as you start to build intimacy
and trust and you see it's reciprocal, they're opening up
to you, that's the time to explain this stuff, all right.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
When we come back.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
The new thing interpersonal intelligence versus intra personal intelligence. I'll
explain the difference when we come back. You're listening to
the Doctor Wendy Walls Show on KFI AM six forty
Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 5 (06:57):
You're listening to Doctor Wendy Walsh on demand from KFI
AM six forty Welcome.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
Back to the Doctor Wendywall Show on KFI AM six
forty Live everywhere on.
Speaker 2 (07:08):
The iHeartRadio app. Can we talk.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
About your interpersonal intelligence. You know, that's very different from
your intra personal intelligence. Actually, I teach a class on intelligence,
and I always tell the students that some other are
going to get this wrong on the exam. The definitions
intra means insight inside yourself, being aware of your own feelings,
(07:32):
being authentic, being able to have some emotional intelligence about
managing your own feelings, expressing your feelings to other But
inter personal intelligence is now becoming very in vogue. So
maybe one time, maybe your partner somebody you're with, gave
(07:53):
you really unhelpful advice. You know, when people say things like, well,
things are going to get better or you'll get over it,
and you're really not in the mood to hear these things.
In fact, when they say that kind of stuff, it
makes you feel worse. And on top of it, your
partner doesn't even understand why you need help. I don't
understand why it's such a big deal. You're making a
(08:15):
mountain out of a mole hill. That's what people say,
right well, according to a new study at the University
of California, Santa Barbara, the world of emotion regulation research
is actually undergoing a big shift. We are moving away
from intra personal meaning emotions within yourself to interpersonal getting
(08:36):
some help from someone else.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
You know.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
I like to say that a healthy relationship is interdependent.
You don't want two people who are too independent. You
don't want people who are too dependent on each other.
You want people who are healthfully interdependent, taking turns leaning
on each other's shoulders. So researchers at the University of
California Santa Barbara say, but obviously, couples who have higher
(09:01):
emotional intimacy with each other are better at regulating each
other's emotions because love helps you become more motivated to
calm your partner down, to reset their mood.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
So the way they did this study is.
Speaker 1 (09:14):
Really interesting is they would read these vignettes about life
to people the participants, and some were positive, some were negative,
and then for each one they would say, okay, so
here's eight different emotions. Words for emotions you know, might
be proud, excited, guilty, angry, afraid. At which emotion do
you think the person is going to experience when.
Speaker 2 (09:37):
This happens to them?
Speaker 1 (09:38):
And then they ask the partner, if this happened to
you and you were feeling bad, what would you like
to hear your partner say right, And so here's an example.
Like they're very kind of vague and could be interpreted
in any way. So here's one from the study. The
riskwatch I inherited from my great grandfather stopped working this morning.
(10:00):
Repair said there's no.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
Way to fix it. It was so old.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
I hardly used it. I know it's just an object,
but it's been in my family for ages. I wish
there was a way to get it working again. I
will stay right here. There's going to be a gender
divide in the answers. If the person reading this is
a female, the dude's going to want to find a
way to fix it.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
I'm guys like to fix problems.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
They think the answer is fixing, but instead the researchers
say what emotion do you think your partner will experience?
Of course they're also asking the partner privately, what would
this do to you? Write this feeling? And then what
would you say to them to help them feel better?
And then they asked the partner what would you like,
not in front of them, what would you like? So
(10:40):
what they found out is that people who have better
Now I'm going to use that word again, intra personal. Sorry, Yeah,
intra personal intelligence, meaning they have can sense their own feelings,
They know that feeling in their stomach, and they have
a word for it. They tend to be more empathetic
and be more accurate in guessing their partner's emotions. Also,
(11:05):
I'm surprised to have to say this, people have an
avoidant attachment style. We're really clueless about how to help
their partners. But here's the big news. Empathy isn't a
trait you're born with. Yes, to some degree, some people
are higher they're more empathetic than others. But it is
also a skill that can be cultivated and strengthened. And
(11:27):
there's all kinds of things you can do that are
backed by science. Number one, taking someone else's perspective, literally
walking in someone's shoes when something else is going on,
asking yourself, hmm, what would it.
Speaker 2 (11:42):
Be like if I were them? What would it like?
Speaker 1 (11:46):
Literally asking that question all the time, imagining the other
person's point of view. You can actually hone a skill
and a practice to have more empathy by just constantly
asking yourself, huh, what would it feel like to be them?
Speaker 2 (12:01):
Right now?
Speaker 1 (12:02):
There's also research to support the idea that mindfulness met
meditation improves emotional regulation and even attunement to other people's emotions.
This one study that was published in Psychological Science found
that just two weeks of practicing loving kindness meditation increase
(12:23):
brain activity in areas associated with empathy. See here's the thing.
When you're meditating, you're hopefully told to allow anything, respect it,
love it, love yourself, love others. Just breathe, just relax,
let the feelings come. It's everything's okay. Non judgmental awareness
of our feelings, and that helps us have empathy for others.
(12:46):
Here's one of my favorites. If you're somebody who only
reads nonfiction, get off that junk. You need to read
literary fiction. Or you have complex characters and they have
a whole stream of different emotions, right, this will help
you understand other people's thoughts and emotions. Literally, just reading
(13:07):
more good literary fiction will increase your emotional intelligence. And finally,
just spending more time with people from different backgrounds, okay,
whether it's different races, different genders, different ages, different origins,
countries of origin, just to understand their perspectives, people with
(13:29):
different political views, people with different religious views. Just spending
time asking questions not being rude, not rudely criticizing, but
understand trying to understand their perspective. This can open up
your mind. And here's the best news of all. Our
brain is plastic brain. Plasticity is on your side. Empathy
(13:51):
is linked to neurocircuits involving what's called the mirror neur neurons, sorry,
the mirror neuron system. And this will actually grow. I
like to say a lot of these behaviors, if you
continue to do them, will grow new super highways, new lanes,
new offshoots. It's called intentional repetition. So simply put, if
(14:14):
you practice empathy, you can literally rewire your brain for it.
And this is what you need to have a healthy relationship. Hey,
we come back. I have a very special guest. I'm
so excited to have him on the show. He's the
co host of the podcast called Love Factually, and he's
(14:36):
a researcher in interpersonal relationships and he's got some interesting
things to say about love. You're listening to the Dr
Wendy wall Show on KFI AM six forty. We're live
everywhere in the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 5 (14:50):
You're listening to Doctor Wendy Walsh on demand from KFI
AM six forty.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Welcome back to the Doctor Wendy Wall Show on KFI
AMCIX live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. Now, I'm about
to fan girl again. You know I do this every
once in a while, I get somebody on the show
who I'm actually a big fan of. And this week's
guest is doctor Paul Eastwick. He's a professor at UC Davis.
(15:17):
But get this, he runs a lab where he does
research on all my favorite subjects, attraction relationships. But also
he's cool because he's co hosting the podcast Love Factually,
of course, available on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 4 (15:33):
This is Love Factually, the podcast that analyzes rom coms
and romantic films using the science of close relationships.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
So as want to be film critics, We're going to
meet the people where they are.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
This podcast is about what the movies get right and
wrong about how relationships actually were.
Speaker 2 (15:51):
Hi, doctor Paul, how are you?
Speaker 4 (15:54):
Hi?
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Very goodness?
Speaker 4 (15:56):
Thanks someone for having me on today.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
You didn't know that i'mould be fangirl on you on
live radio.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
Yeah right right, Okay, I'm ready. I'll see if I.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
Can live up to them.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
Okay, So what I want to talk about We don't
have a whole lot of time, but what I like
to talk about is your mate evaluation theory. But before
we do that, I need to know the story behind
Love Factually. It is such a brilliant title for your podcast.
What is the podcast Love Factually?
Speaker 4 (16:25):
And yes, So the basic idea behind the podcast is,
along with my longtime collaborator and now co host, Eli Finkle,
we take the science of close relationships is we have
understood it and internalized it over the years, and what
we do is we talk about how various rom coms
and romantic films reflect what we know in the science,
(16:49):
either what the films are getting right or what they're
kind of mangling.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
Well, I'm going to tell you that I have always
said what they get wrong pretty much one hundred percent
of them is that they they end at the beginning
of a relationship.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
That is is a fantastic point. There's so many of
those films that classically do that right. You get what
you're doing, You're seeing what amounts to something like the
first ten percent of the relationship, and that's part is
supposed to make it feel good and like say, send
you home feeling happy and look sometimes they depict that
(17:27):
early ten percent. Well, but we've got to acknowledge that
there's a lot left to come when the movies end,
when the couple gets together, right and.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
They get past their limerins and move into intellectual commitment
kind of love.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (17:43):
Now, we've covered plenty of movies that do cover the
whole art. It's actually kind of tough if we want
to give the movies a break. It's tough to go
from beginning all the way to the end. Right, Are
there any la Land is one that does it really well?
Speaker 3 (17:59):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (17:59):
I mean also the Notebook, Come on.
Speaker 4 (18:02):
The note right right, That is one of the view
that goes from the beginning to end. Really the end
the spoiler alertly yeah, really the end literally the Notebook. Yeah.
But but they're out there, and and we like to give,
you know, you know, accolades to those movies that pull
(18:23):
it off.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
So moving from the podcast onto some of your research.
Speaker 2 (18:28):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
One of your most famous studies has to do with
something called mate evaluation theory, and it basically talks about
how people analyze, evaluate, make selection for potential mates.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
And and I read the.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
Whole study today because what I do is I turn
it into language everyone can understand. And now I'm going
to have you correct me if I say it wrong.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
I'm ready, I'm ready.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
There are basically five ways that people evaluate a mate. Right, First,
you talk about something called shared evolved mechanisms.
Speaker 2 (19:05):
And cultural scripts.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
Is this David Buss's evolutionary stuff. I'm hearing that women
like men who are tall, and men like women who
are fertile and roundt Yeah, really.
Speaker 4 (19:20):
It is is definitely meant to encompass that. Right. So
anything that's like agreed upon, whether the reason for agreement
is there something evolved in the mind that this is
appealing to who we are as a species on average,
or because I don't know, we've decided in this culture
that you know, it's appealing if you can like make
(19:42):
really great TikTok videos like actually.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Right, this is attractive.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
I mean, I will say, I'm a woman of a
certain age, and I've watched female body shape change over
the years, and in the nineteen eighties it was the
advent of the boob job, and it was very exciting
to suddenly see breasts on every and now it's all
about but right, So that's one example of a cultural script.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
All right, moving on number.
Speaker 1 (20:09):
Two individual differences that affect how a perceiver. That's somebody
who's attracted to somebody views all potential mates. So is
this like somebody's deal breaker list, Like this is my checklist,
these are things I'm looking for.
Speaker 4 (20:23):
I would think of this one as like this is
like people's own personality. So some people are happy people,
and honestly, they're going to be happy in whatever relationship
you put them in. And some people they're not so
much and they're going to be kind of miserable in
whatever relationship you put them in. So that's this component.
It's kind of like is your lens that you take
(20:46):
to the whole world and it doesn't matter who you're with.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
Interesting because my new husband, Julio, he is a giggly
Dominican and he's the happiest person.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
I've ever met in my life.
Speaker 4 (20:59):
There you go.
Speaker 1 (21:00):
Then I'm met his whole family in Dominican Republic and
they all giggle. I was like, Wow, it's a cultural thing.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
This is cool. Yep, so happy with anybody, even me.
Speaker 4 (21:11):
Yeah, there you go, and like, look, don't feel bad.
It's a really good good thing to be to have
a little bit of some rose colored glasses.
Speaker 3 (21:21):
As you view the boy.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
Oh yes, I have to reel him back in all
the time, as his optimism.
Speaker 2 (21:26):
Is a little too high. Uh okay, moving on to
the third one.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
Individual differences that affect how a perceiver views some targets
depending on the target's feature.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
So let me take a crack at this. Yeah, so
would this be correct?
Speaker 1 (21:41):
Maybe somebody with an anxious attachment style might look at
a partner's emotional passion and intensity as being really attractive.
But if that person looking is avoidant, they might feel smothered.
Speaker 4 (21:58):
That's a great example. Yeah, I mean this also would
encompass the deal breaker list you mentioned earlier, the idea
that that I, like, I can't stand people who you know,
like going to fancy seven course meal restaurants, Like I
just can't be with somebody like that, Like that is,
you know, too high falutant for me. If you have
(22:20):
that kind of deal breaker, that's this third one that
you're talking about.
Speaker 2 (22:23):
Not yourself. Do not invite Paul to dinner? Okay, gotcha?
Speaker 1 (22:29):
All right, we have to go to we have to
go to rat Okay, when we come back there two
more as part of your made evaluation theory. And then
I want to talk about what this made evaluation theory
can teach.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
Us about dating. Okay, we'll be right back.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
You are listening to the Doctor Wendy Wall Show on
kf I AM six forty Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 5 (22:50):
You're listening to doctor Wendy Walsh on demand from KFI
AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
Welcome back to the Doctor Wendy Wall Show.
Speaker 1 (22:57):
I'm KFI AM six forty Live every where on the
iHeartRadio app. My guest is University of California Davis Professor,
doctor Paul Eastwick. He is also a researcher in attraction, relationships,
interpersonal love, sex, the whole shabang. He has the numbers
and the data on it. Okay, doctor Paul, your mate
(23:19):
evaluation theory, how people evaluate mates to be a potential mate,
You say narratives about idiosyncratic reactions to one particular target. Now,
I just got to admonish you on that is some
psychobabble there.
Speaker 3 (23:33):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (23:33):
I had to think about that for a minute.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Okay, So I would say this is like, I think
this is the exciting part because this is does this
mean that if you like have this sense that there's
great meaning to this relationship to you in particular, I
don't know, like there's something about this person that makes
(23:55):
you go, oh, it's meant to be.
Speaker 2 (23:56):
It feels magical.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
Yes. And also about the things that you construct along
the way. And this is the one that I think
is if you ask the average person what is important
in your relationship, they're gonna ultimately gravitate towards these kinds
of things. The special rituals we have, the pet names
(24:19):
we have for each other, the customers that we build,
the values that we've created over time. And this stuff
is huge.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
True.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
This is as a couple creating, or what an individual
creates in their life and then says, wow, this person
fits that.
Speaker 4 (24:36):
It is really supposed to be what you are creating.
I'll say, like this where you're creating the con in
a context with this particular person. And the real idea
with this one is the idea that, like, I can't
just take somebody else who like looks a up like
your partner and substitute them in. Like, the point is
that this person was there along the way for the
(24:58):
creation of these things, Like you have memory with this person,
and that's that's what it's really about.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
And I always say relationships are a living thing. They're
like growing a gardener together. And having been prior to
meeting my now husband, I was a single mom for
twenty years with two little girls, and I did not
want to risk exposing my kids to a poor romantic
choice that I might make. But I knew that if
(25:24):
I kept studying this stuff, by the time they got
of age and old enough, I would find my person.
But there is something now that I'm in a secure
attachment where I really feel like there's a living thing.
Like we're co thinkers, we're co emotional.
Speaker 4 (25:41):
You know.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
He does half the thinking, you know, and I do
half the intellectual work. I mean, a great example, here's
a simple, simple example, and I'm sure many couples do this.
One of us will be working on an email and
we will read it aloud to the other person. It
might be an important email, and he will add more
business language or analytically language to mine, and I will
(26:02):
add more emotional language.
Speaker 4 (26:04):
To Yep, we get emois in there had an exclamation point.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
Exactly. Now're a team. We're thinking like one brain exactly.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
Yeah, yeah, right, And it's this thing that people build
together that you know, what we try to point out
in this paper is we all kind of intuitively get
that this is really important, and we as researchers are
actually not great at capturing it. And that's for a
bunch of methodological reasons that aren't especially fascinating. But the
(26:36):
bottom line is what we think the lion's share of
compatibility is how well you create a culture to your relationship. Well,
we actually just haven't. Uh, you know, there's a lot
out there about that that still needs to be explored
and understood.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
And just so that people understand what you just said,
one of the problems with doing relationship research is a
lot of it is self reporting. You can't like put
people in MRI machines and just say.
Speaker 2 (27:04):
Oh, there's love, although some attachment.
Speaker 4 (27:06):
Researchers are doing that right right right.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
Okay, So let's go to what made evaluation theory can
teach us about dating. Now that we know these points, what,
how does that help us make better decisions?
Speaker 4 (27:21):
Well, I think where it can really help people is
to recognize that there's some amount of curiosity that is
important when it comes to being in a relationship with somebody.
It's curiosity about how did we get to this point
and are the patterns we set up early in our
relationships still serving us. Well. You know, one of the
(27:44):
challenges that often happens is that, you know, couples do
things because they work right, and they keep those things
going because they were effective at one time. But it
can be very easy for one or both couple members
to lose track of what their needs are as they
change over time, and to realize that the patterns they've
set up might actually now be getting in the way,
(28:06):
might equally even be stifling one of them. And so,
you know, I'm a big believer that you know that
many couples can make it work, but it does require
some amount of curiosity about what the other person is
experiencing and how did we get here? Do we need
(28:27):
to mix things up or not right?
Speaker 2 (28:29):
I call it rewriting the relationship contract.
Speaker 3 (28:32):
From time to time. Yeah, there you go.
Speaker 1 (28:34):
And also when it comes to choosing you mate, looking
at some of these cultural scripts is a good idea
for us to become aware of them and realize how
they could be limiting us.
Speaker 4 (28:46):
Yes, I mean, I'm a big believer in the idea
that actually the narratives that you co create with somebody
really begin from the first moment. Like a lot of times,
what we think we're trying to do is assess things
like how how good are you know this person's traits?
Are they attractive, are they intelligent? Are they funny? But
(29:07):
we're really doing is trying to figure out are they
funny with me?
Speaker 5 (29:12):
Right?
Speaker 4 (29:13):
Do they seem smart with me? Do they make me
feel smart? Like it's relational from the very first few minutes.
I mean, we even see this if you look at
you know, first impression research, and we've collected a lot
of data on first impressions. But what people are trying
to do is just find something where they both have
(29:34):
a little bit of knowledge in common, and they can
kind of try to start scaffolding something together, something that
they have in common, something that they can sort of
bond over a little bit, and then you sort of
build up from there. So you know, everything is a construction,
and it really happens from the very beginning.
Speaker 1 (29:52):
So when I met my husband during COVID, during quarantine
and lockdown, my role was they had to meet me
on a windy pier wearing a mask. Okay, and if
they couldn't do that, then if they want to protect
my health, it's not going to happen. And then when
we sat down for I only do coffee day, so
it was only twenty minutes they got you got to
leave them wanting more, you know. And then I said,
(30:13):
when we sat down, I said, look, you know, we
could sit here and brag about the masks were off
at this point because we were more than six feet
apart and the wind was going. Yeah, and I said,
we could sit here and brag about how great we
are and how datable we are. But could we begin
actually by each of us telling a story of why
we think we're completely undateable.
Speaker 4 (30:32):
Oh that's wonderful, he said.
Speaker 2 (30:35):
Okay, you'll go first.
Speaker 1 (30:40):
Good, and he had a much much more tragic story
than I did, but it developed intimacy from the get go.
Speaker 4 (30:48):
Yep, right, it was that's great. Yeah, I spot on.
I love to plug urt eron. And you know the
grade thirty six questions. Oh yes, studying, Yeah, I mean
right exactly. But really, what you're doing in that sixty
to ninety minute period is you are getting comfortable and
then talking about things that are interesting and deep and meaningful.
(31:10):
And people can do this in short periods of time.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
Oh yeah, and within ten minutes of our coffee coming,
both of us had our eyes welling up with tears
over our stories. Yeah, and dealing with the shame of
having to tell the story too right. And so I
wanted to ask you one more question before time is
so tight and Radio I'm sorry. The last question has
(31:34):
to do when it comes to this study with these
sort of these models we have in our heads for
what we're talking specifically heterrich sexual relations. Here, for my example,
an opposite gender parents' role is in our model of love. So,
for instance, with my husband, we will be out shopping
(31:55):
somewhere and he'll be in the next aisle over and
he will clear his throat one hundred percent it is
my dad. Everything about the sound, the tone and everything,
And I almost get startled when I hear it. Did
I unconsciously choose him partly because of that? Oh?
Speaker 4 (32:13):
I don't know. I mean there is a little bit
of work showing that, Yeah, that people can be unconsciously
primed with images of parents, and you know, they feel
a little bit more safe. And so maybe that you know,
is coming from somebody of your you know, preferred age
and gender that you just find yourself a little bit
more attractive with that person for that reason. But this
(32:35):
stuff is going to be really really subtle. Yeah, any
unconscious effects are going to be very very small on
the whole. But it's possible that you know, things like
like what you mentioned there, uh, sort of the way
that he clears his throughout might might be a small
thing that carried over from those unconscious leanings.
Speaker 1 (32:56):
Which might have been important to me and my trauma
is that my parents both died of cancer in the
same year when I was young, and so interesting enough,
his mother, who's eighty six years old, I.
Speaker 2 (33:07):
Love, so I got a dad and a mom back
with this marriage.
Speaker 4 (33:09):
Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah, right right, quite sure.
Speaker 1 (33:13):
Yeah, Paul, it is a delight to have you on
the Doctor Wendy Wall Show here on KFI. We are
going to have your co host, Eli Finkel next week,
I believe, so we'll make sure that we cover love
factually as much as we can. Thanks so much for
being with us. My guest is doctor Paul Eastwick, a
professor at the University of California Davis. You've been listening
(33:34):
to The Doctor Wendy Wall Show on KFI AM six forty.
We're live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. You've been listening
to Doctor Wendy Waals. You can always hear us live
on KFI Am six forty from seven to nine pm
on Sunday and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
Dr. Wendy Walsh on Demand News
Popular Podcasts
40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season
Daniel Jeremiah of Move the Sticks and Gregg Rosenthal of NFL Daily join forces to break down every team's needs this offseason.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.