We have been doing this show on and off for years. We are getting better!
Brian and Jeffrey debated whether the president should control White House press access and criticized judicial intervention requiring access for particular news organizations. They discussed the launch of a White House 24-hour video channel and compared Trump’s frequent press interactions with Joe Biden’s limited press conferences.
.css-1t8gq41{border:none;background-image:none;background-color:transparent;box-shadow:none;color:#2F3133;cursor:pointer;font-size:inherit;padding:0;-webkit-text-decoration:inherit;text-decoration:inherit;width:-webkit-max-content;width:-moz-max-content;width:max-content;}.css-1t8gq41:hover,.css-1t8gq41:focus{-webkit-text-decoration:inherit;text-decoration:inherit;}
The speakers discussed two reported measles deaths in Pennsylvania and debated whether those deaths should be attributed to public-health policy or individual circumstances. The discussion expanded to COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA technology, alleged vaccine injuries, and the difference between dying from a specific infection and dying because age or underlying illness reduced ...
Jeffrey and Brian formally introduced episode 349 and briefly discussed alcohol-sales rules in West Virginia and Virginia. They then examined Michigan municipal restrictions on pride flags and the reported allowance for an Iranian flag on government buildings, using the issue to debate diversity, religious governance, and LGBTQ+ policy.
Participants debated how claims of gender equality intersect with differences in physical strength and the legal or social expectations surrounding violence between men and women. The discussion then shifted briefly to Brian McFadden’s age and whether he had ever been punched in the face.
The ...
The hosts discussed a reported DHS list of judges viewed as hostile to Trump and debated whether identifying them publicly amounted to doxxing. They then shifted to suppressor rules and possible restoration of gun rights for people with nonviolent felony convictions.
The discussion focused on the Ke...
Jeffrey and Brian recalled an incident involving Cornell students who butchered a bear in a dormitory community kitchen. They said Cornell subsequently created policies prohibiting similar conduct and briefly discussed the quality and preparation of bear meat.
Testecleese described a lawsuit brought by...
The conversation moved to a court ruling about installing a ballroom in the White House, with participants questioning whether such renovations require Congressional approval and noting perceived partisan enforcement. They discussed which chambers must pass measures for such changes and how political alignment influences enforcement.
The discussion opened with the $250 passport bill that features Trump's image and whether it will be optional or necessarily require extra fees. Participants debated its potential as a collectible and compared it to other novelty currency they keep.
Participants discussed a politician-linked organiza...
The conversation began with skepticism that a conservative Republican could win election in Maine and participants compared Maine's politics to neighboring Vermont, including a personal anecdote about a brother who supports Bernie Sanders.
Participants debated distinctions between social welfare and ...
A participant recounted being intoxicated, noticing a slow-moving car entering a neighbor's long driveway, and approaching the vehicle with a shotgun to investigate; the homeowner had just returned from teaching abroad and expressed gratitude for the check. The speaker emphasized that if no one had been home the situation could have been dangerous.
The meeting reviewed a wide set of political, security, legal, and local community issues, ranging from a contested Senate nomination to international security concerns and urban infrastructure incidents.
Participants detailed allegations against a recently nominated Senate candidate, including sexual miscon...
The meeting reviewed recent Supreme Court activity and ideological balance, with extended debate over individual justices, long dissents, and political consequences of appointing younger conservative justices. Attendees discussed birthright citizenship, congressional options to change it, and multiple SCOTUS decisions’ state-level impacts.
The meeting was an extended, informal group discussion spanning sports, local civic issues, national politics, legal developments, military and technology policy, and personal topics. Conversation mixed news reactions, policy interpretations, and local anecdotes without formal decisions.
Sports and culture: ...
Legal and criminal matters: The team discussed the necessity and fairness of FISA surveillance and secret courts and reviewed which presidents reauthorized relat...
The meeting reviewed a wide range of recent news items focusing on violent incidents, legal actions, election integrity, school policies, and public-safety debates. Coverage included a reportedly precise strike that killed Khamani, multiple criminal trials and convictions, and contentious local school and campus disciplinary decisions.
The meeting was a wide-ranging current-affairs briefing touching on local incidents, national politics and policy, international security developments, cultural controversies, and technical and public-health items.
The meeting covered a broad set of public-safety, legal, and political topics, focusing on contested public projects, courtroom and public-health mask rules, criminal cases and protests, labor actions, and immigration enforcement disputes.
Civic projects and property disputes: attendees clarified the Kennedy...
The meeting was a multi-topic briefing and planning session covering current events, political controversies, technical incidents, and podcast production decisions.
Legal and election issues:...
The meeting reviewed a range of regional and national news items spanning public health, crime, political legal actions, and transportation safety. Participants exchanged reports, reactions, and local context rather than making decisions.
Public health and technical concerns included several suspected rodent...
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.
Mike Florio & Chris Simms discuss the biggest NFL stories with honesty, candor, and authenticity.