April 27, 2024 • 34 mins
Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, joins us to discuss treatment of President Trump by the press, the government and Biden’s DOJ.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thanks Scott.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Shown an hour two Sean Hannity Show this Friday, eight
hundred and ninety four one. Shawn is on number if
you want to be a part of the program. Well,
one of the most important investigations that Congress is undertaking
now is the weaponization of the Department of Justice. How
the Department of Justice under Joe Biden is when weaponized
and politicized. We saw this ridiculous civil trial take place,
(00:26):
all of course led by an ag in New York
that made a promise to go after one man, one family,
one organization, and that's Leticia James. Now we see another
in this case, a da going after Donald Trump. One man,
one person, one organization, one family, and his promise to
investigate Trump as New York Manhattan, New York City District Attorney.
(00:49):
He said this as a candidate. Listen, whoever has this job,
are they going to convict Donald Trump?
Speaker 3 (00:56):
That is the number one if thank you, we know
he's investigating. I'm the candidate in the race who has
the experience with Donald Trump. I was the chief deputy
in the Attorney General's office. We sued the Trump administration
over one hundred times for the Muslim travel band, for
family separation at the border, for Shenanigans with the census,
(01:19):
so I know how to litigate with him. I also
led the team that did the Trump Foundation case. I
believe we have to hold him accountable. I haven't seen
all the facts beyond the public but I've litigated with him,
and so I'm prepared to go where the facts take
me once I see them, and hold him accountable.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
The facts as he sees them.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
They already made a determination long before, which is one
of the problems.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Anyway.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
Thankfully, we have people in Congress like Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan.
He is the chairman of the all important House Judiciary Committee.
Among their many investigations, they have been looking into the FBI,
the doj of Joe Biden, and whether it's been politicized
and weaponized. They recently released what is called the Anatomy
of a political prosecution, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office vendetta
(02:09):
against President Donald Trump, their interim staff report, and we
welcome back Jim Jordan with us over three hundred pages long.
That means you got a lot, You have a lot
to tell here.
Speaker 4 (02:20):
Yeah, and I love the part you just played sean
of Alvin Bragg bragging about, you know, one hundred times
he'd went after President Trump. So that's what he said
when he ran for the job. But here's the kicker.
This case was so bad even Alvin Bragg wasn't going
to bring it. I mean, the Department of Justice looked
at this. He said, we're not going to bring a case.
As the Federal Elections Commission, We're not going to bring case.
Si Vans, Alvin Bragg's predecessor, he wasn't going to bring
(02:41):
a case. Alvin Bragg, Bragg's back going after President Trump
gets elect it takes a look at this case and says,
I'm not going to bring it either. There's nothing here.
And then one of his assistants, one of his assistant
DA's Mark Pomerantz, resigns, writes a book, does a media tour,
and all that pressure from the left, that's what's convinced
Alvin back to finally bring this ridiculous case. And as
(03:03):
we're watching it over the last day day, we see
how bad it is and how it's all falling apart.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
Well, we see it's all falling apart. I don't I
still believe that I'm right that I don't think Donald
Trump can get a fair trial as it relates to
any New York courtroom. I hope I'm proven wrong. I'm
hopeful that at least one juror. I'm hoping at best
maybe for a hung jury. But you know, you see
what is what is happening here, And you know one
(03:29):
of the things Greg Jarrett wrote about this is he
called it, you know, the filth By Association is the
Da Braggs legal strategy. And they start with the former
publisher of the National Inquirer and this catch and killed
practice that he has used for I guess a bunch
of other people in the past, which, by the way,
nothing is illegal. The top prosecutor in this case quit.
(03:52):
I think he was the third ranking official in Joe
Biden's Justice Department, Matthew, I don't know how to Yeah, Glangelo, Okay,
thank you. But he's the one that gave opening arguments.
He left his job, which was fairly prestigious at the
Justice Department just to go after Donald Trump on behalf
(04:13):
of Biden's Justice department. Do we not see a conflict
of interest there? How many times was Fannie Willis at
Biden's White House meeting with White House counsel. How many
times did other people go to the White House and
coordinate with these people?
Speaker 1 (04:26):
I mean it stinks to how you heaven?
Speaker 4 (04:28):
Yeah, col Angelo is out to get the president. Palmerant
who wrote the book. Remember Palmerant, he wasn't paid, he
was an assistant DA. In fact, he says in his book,
I would have paid to go after President Trump. So
he said, when I negotiate, my salary was easy because
I would have paid to do this. They didn't have
to pay me. That's how much these people are biased.
And here's here's the thing. The crime, the so called
(04:49):
crime Alvin Bragg is saying, is that, oh, President Trump,
there's some some the business records weren't exactly right, according
to Alvin Bragg, and that was part of this effort
to conspire to obstruct and impede the twenty sixteen elections.
And then you think about what else happened yesterday Jack Smith.
That case is in front of the Supreme Court and
they were arguing. Jack Smith is arguing the climb is
(05:11):
conspiring to impact the twenty twenty election. The real conspiracy,
seems to me, is between Alvin Bragg, Fani Willison Jack Smith.
They're all conspiring to influence the twenty twenty four elections.
That's the real conspiracy. President Trump didn't do anything to
impact the twenty sixteen elections other than campaign and run
a great campaign and win. So this is to me
(05:32):
is the real takeaway. The conspiracy exists between Bragg, Smith
and willis to impact the twenty twenty four elections instead
of letting just wea the people decide.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Well, I think a conviction, which would probably say the
odds are very high, may happen in this case. I
would think that the facts would matter. But look at
how bad this has gotten. You have a judge in
this case that donated it in twenty twenty to Joe Biden.
You would think that would be a reason for accusal.
You have the accusations. The least dephonic has gone into
(06:04):
detail about them, about possible family conflicts and and how
a family would be benefiting from from the trial and
the outcome of this trial. That's a big issue. What
you have in New York are what would be a
book keeping errors. That's all this case really is about.
And at the end of the day, that is a misdemeanor.
(06:25):
But the statute of limitations along gone on charging a
misdemeanor in the case, How did they get to a
federal election law in New York City as a means
of even you know, for for that trial to take
place when Biden's own Justice Department is weaponized as it is,
they didn't even charge Donald Trump because they didn't see
a case on that front.
Speaker 4 (06:45):
Even the DJ even I Biden would wouldn't bring this
this case. Yeah, again underscore the political focus, the lawfair
focus from today's labs out to get President Trump. And
again this case it's so bad. They're also relying as
their key witness Michael Cohen, convicted perjurer Michael Cohen. Michael
(07:07):
Cohen who when he came to for the United States
Congress lied six times under oath. We did a referral
for that four years ago when he came in front
of Congress. That's their star witness in this particular case.
So again the escalation of what they've done, what the
left has done, what government has done to President Trump,
all the way back to sixteen when they spied on
his campaign. Then it was the Mueller investigation. Nineteen lawyers,
(07:31):
forty ages, thirty million, dollars. Then it was impeachment, Then
it was raiding his home. Then it was Jacksmith named
special counsel. Two indictments from Jacksmith, Bonnie Wilson, Georgia, Albin
Bragg here in New York. Then it was the Fourteenth Amendment,
and now this case actually going to trial. And then
the trial they're saying, gag order on President Trump. We
may not even tell you who the witnesses are going
to be called on each day at the trial. We
(07:52):
may not do what we always do. And then this
is how bad has gotten. And my God tells me
they're going to probably try something else that we don't
know about yet because we're still six months away from
the election.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Well, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
I mean, if we're listening to oral arguments yesterday, I
would say that Jack Smith was probably very disappointed with
the questioning of the Supreme Court justices at the end. Now,
I don't think the justices will go with absolute immunity.
I never thought that was the way it should have
been argued. I'm not a lawyer, but after interviewing all
the attorneys that I know that I respect, the consensus
(08:28):
was that it should be limited immunity that would have
covered any issues that Jack Smith was investigating. But without
a doubt, there's no way. I don't see a way
that that trial gets moving. The Fannie Willis case is stalled,
and I believe the document cases is stalled. You went
into a lot of detail about how Bragg, for example,
(08:50):
is disregard for violent crime. You went into a lot
of detail about the about this man Pomeranz and why
in his deposition and he would do this for free,
And in his deposition he declined to answer most questions.
What was going on behind the scenes.
Speaker 4 (09:05):
Oh, he took the fifth so many times during we release.
That's why we released this transcript, just to show this
is the guy who was the catalyst for Alvin Bragg
to ultimately bring this case, the case that he didn't
want to bring and no one else would bring. This
was the guy. And then when he came we had
to subpoena him to come testify. He fought it, it
went to court, the court said no, you got to
testify for good to take He wrote a book about it.
(09:25):
And then when we bring him in for the deposition,
he takes the fifth. I don't know how many times,
but more times than we can count, more times than
we can remember. So, yeah, that's the basis of this
whole thing. He called it the Zombie case, the case
that had been dead no one, but they brought it
back to life because of his public pressure on Alvin
Bragg the DA there in Manhattan.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Did you ever get a chance to go through this
book because you called the z He called it the
zombie case, and you discussed in your report how he
shifted through many novel, untested legal theories in search of
a crime, and how his politicized reliance on is basically
the main witness as you mentioned earlier, Michael Cohen and
(10:08):
Pomerantz's personal animus towards an obsession towards all things Donald Trump.
I mean, it would just be like, why would anybody
leave the Justice Department if you're the third highest ranking
official to go argue a case in New York City
against his boss's number one rival political rival.
Speaker 4 (10:26):
Yeah, Colangelo leads the Justice Department high ranking position to
go after President Trump. Palm Arantz goes and works for
the DA, takes no salary all to go after President Trump.
This is all political. And there were some members of
the DA's officers said we can't have Michael Cohen as
the star witness in this case. And yet Palmarantz pushboard
(10:48):
and ultimately that's what Bragg's doing. And Michael Cohen is
going to be on the stand here in one of
the upcoming days, and we will hear from a guy
who has done nothing but lie about the President I
don't know, for the last four five years.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
I mean, pretty unbelievable. All right, quick break more with
the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan on
the other side. All right, we continue with Jim Jordan,
Ohio Congressman. He is the chairman of the all important
House Judiciary Committee. The scary part of this, and this
kind of came up a little bit in the immunity
oral arguments yesterday in the Supreme Court is at one point,
(11:23):
I don't remember which justice brought up the point that, well,
if a president appoints an attorney general, that pretty much
lets them do anything at that point. There really isn't
any law at that point, it really doesn't matter. And
so I think that's an argument for limited immunity. I mean, otherwise,
will we prosecute Barack Obama for drone strikes that killed
(11:45):
the Americans, would we prosecute George W. Bush because the
information and intel he used to justify the war in
Iraq didn't pan out some of it.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
In the end, you know, where does this all end?
Speaker 2 (11:58):
That every president now has a filtered, very difficult decision
make decisions through the prism of whether or not he's
going to face a jury when he leaves office.
Speaker 4 (12:09):
Right right now, the courts are then clear. In the
past they said a president has to be able to
fearlessly and then partially conduct the duties of his office.
So because if he's got this, this this criminal liability
hanging over his head, he just won't be able to function.
And there are two basic elements. Was he president, yes,
of course President Trump was president at the time. And
was he engaged in official duties? And of course he was.
They're trying to say his official duties and looking into
(12:31):
what was this election done the way it was supposed
to be done, they're trying to say that was somehow criminal.
They're trying to say that he was involved in a
conspiracy to obstruct the official proceeding, which is with January sixth,
that is just not accurate, just not true. So that's
how weak that case is as well. And I do
think what's likely to happen is, as you said, Urshan,
the Supreme Court sends it back to the lower court
(12:54):
and there'll be a fact intensive approach to looking at
all this the subject matter, all the facts there that's
going to take while. You know what was interesting yesterday
is every headline I saw was, oh, this is going
to take times, that goes back to the lower court
and we will not get a decision before the election.
Well why is before the election so darn important to
the left. I think that just underscores what we've been saying,
(13:14):
This is all political. The focus should be on how
does the immunity totally impact the President of the United
States so he can do his job and getting the
right answer there and getting to the facts, not some
political motive, which is exactly what the left has. And
you see that by every thinking headline in the mainstream
media was oh, it may not get done now until
until after the election, which you can just see them
(13:35):
all like disappointed that they're not going to happen.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Did you know the reason?
Speaker 2 (13:38):
If they had their way, Donald Trump would be forced
to stay in a court room for the next one
hundred and ninety two days. Unfortunately, the latest poll Morning
Consult Bloomberg poll shows Donald Trump, you know, winning six
out of seven swing states by some of the largest
margins he's had so far.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
Maybe it's working out.
Speaker 2 (13:59):
And Joe Biden is out there talking about accountables, eating
uncle Bose and of course saying four more years pause,
So maybe that's not such a bad thing.
Speaker 4 (14:10):
Yeah, I pretty soon it'd be back to telling corn
pop stories and who knows what else. Now, that's actually sad.
It's actually sad that the commander and tea for the
greatest country in history is reads from the teleprompter and
actually says the word pause.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
I mean, it's he's a cognitive mess.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
I'll say it for you. I got to ask your
last question. I'm just looking at the clock report Daily Mail.
Thirteen banks working with the Biden administration and their FBI
to spy on Trump's supporters. Do you know about this
and how how deep did they? Did they get a
warren for spying?
Speaker 4 (14:43):
No, they turned over information without any process. We first
saw this from Bank of America with one of the
FBI whistleblowers that you were so helpful and working with
us on and let their stories be told. And now
we realize it's much broader. So we've done a ton
of letters, we've done subpoenas to certain banks, and we've
gotten on information. We're going to continue to get that information.
But it looks like they were looking for any debit
(15:04):
card credit card purchases in and around January sixth, and
then overlaying that information with anyone who may have purchased
a firearm, which is unbelievable direct the violation of people's
fundamental living.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
Eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn is a number
if you want to be a part of the program Accountable.
Speaker 5 (15:23):
Sean gets the answers no one else does. America deserves
and know the truth about Congress all.
Speaker 2 (15:33):
Right, twenty five to the top of the are your
calls coming up? So wasn't a good week for Joe
Biden on the campaign trail. At least they didn't bring
up Uncle Posey again. But he did have my favorite moment,
which is four more years pause, which now they put
in the White House transcript inaudible, was very audible, and
then he claimed at one point this week, we have
(15:54):
the strongest economy in the world, listen to him.
Speaker 6 (15:57):
It's clear we have the strongest economy in the world.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
That's a fact.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
Okay, maybe Joe didn't see the GDP numbers that came
out yesterday, but they were an unmitigated disaster. On top
of the inflation number CPI wholesale price into all of
them up a whopping three and a half percent from
a year over year from last year alone. You know,
all those rate cut hikes everybody was thinking about. No,
(16:24):
not rate cuts that there were. People thought, it's not happening.
It's not going to happen. That is not worth where
the economy is one point six percent GDP is a disaster.
Three point five percent year over year, a consumer price index,
the inflation indicator, No, that's a disaster too. One point
seven million full time jobs have disappeared in the past
(16:47):
five months, according to government data. Mortgage rates now people
have been hoping they've been coming down a little bit,
and unfortunately now they're on their way back up. Because
there were mortgage companies assuming that the rate cuts that
Jerome Powell had promised, the numerous ones were actually going
to happen.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
But it's not going to happen.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
It looks like we're heading more towards stagflation than ever before.
And then the worst number of all I talked about yesterday,
and it was at twenty six percent of our fellow
Americans telling Gallop they are struggling to afford food and
have struggled over the past year. And seventy percent of
respondents to the Bloomberg Pole say the economy is on
the wrong track. No wonder Trump is now winning in
(17:31):
swing states by large margins, according to the Bloomberg Morning
Console poll I had in New Wisconsin, in Arizona and Georgia, Pennsylvania,
North Carolina, and Nevada. Yeah, that all matters. Pretty unbelievable anyway,
I've not heard the entire interview, only clips that my
(17:51):
team has been able to pull off from online. About
I guess Joe Biden was on Howard Stern today. I
can tell you so many friends that grew up. If
you grew up in New York, you listen to Howard start.
I mean, I mean he was iconoclastic, irreverent, a true original,
very talented, very gifted, and now he's bragging that he's woke.
(18:12):
I don't know what happened. I don't know what happened.
Why did he get so freaked out over COVID? And
he managed to duck and dodge it by I guess
hibernating in his house forever. But that didn't work out well.
He ended up getting COVID like everybody else. And thank god.
He's okay. I mean, but a very gifted, talented broadcaster
that clearly is not the same guy that he once was.
(18:33):
It's kind of disappointing. It's it's you know, all those
construction guys that were cheering Trump and four more years
we love Trump. They were Howard Stern listeners back in
the day. I don't know if they're listening to him anymore.
I know a lot of my friends that grew up
listening to him. Unfortunately, they just said they get you know,
they're just disappointed. They feel like, you know, a friend
(18:54):
of theirs, somebody that shared their values and stood up
with them, is not the same person anymore. He still talented,
he's still gifted, he's still a great broadcaster, but you know,
now he'd rather interview Hillary Clinton and Lena Durham and
uh lord, it's her name, Lena, what's Lena whatever? Her
name is Dunham whatever, one day I turned it on.
(19:14):
I'm like, oh my gosh, you gotta be kidding me.
Now it's Joe Biden. And by the way, Joe Biden
tells Stern that he got arrested standing on a porch
with with a black family during civil rights protest. Well,
I wish Howard had watch my show because he would
have known that Joe Biden actually partnered with the former
(19:36):
Klansman Robert KKK Byrd and that together they tried to
stop bussing and integration because Joe Biden, in his words,
didn't want public schools to become racial jungles. But he's
telling a tall tale here.
Speaker 6 (19:51):
Listen, she said, Jolley, let me, And I looked at
my mom and says, honey, you Sandy six. She said, Joey,
let me remember true stories. I remember every when they
were desegregating Lynnfield, the neighborhood was uh uh you know,
seventy homes built at suburbia And I told you, and
there was a black family moving in, and there was
people who were down there protesting. I told you not
(20:14):
to go down there, and you went down remember that,
and you came you got to rest up. He standing
on the on the porch with a black family. Right,
they brought you back the police and I said, yeah,
well I remember that.
Speaker 2 (20:24):
Then he told Howard that women would send him very
salacious pictures back at his early senates and he's give
them to the Secret Service.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
I don't I don't even believe that story.
Speaker 6 (20:35):
But Lissa, when I met when I met Jill, I
I was when I lost my family. Uh, I got
put in that ten most eliguba Batchelor's list were.
Speaker 1 (20:45):
The United States Senator.
Speaker 6 (20:47):
And so and and a lot of lovely women. But uh,
women would send very salacious pictures, and I just give
him to the Secret Service. I thought somebody think I.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Was a couple of more cuts out of this. Uh.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
Joe Biden tells stirring the Trump is the guy in
the neighborhood you wish you could have gotten in the
neighborhood and meet head to head. The guy can't walk
up the big boy stairs to Air Force one anymore.
Speaker 1 (21:13):
What the what is he talking about? I'll take him
ahead of the gym.
Speaker 6 (21:17):
But like for example, you know, I mean Trump makes
fun of me. Right, He's the kind of guy in
the neighbor I wish you could have gotten to the
neighbor head to head anyway.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
Now, by the way, Donald Trump did respond to this,
and yeah, they're really happy about that. They said, yeah,
we're in. They can't wait. When can we set it up? Anyway,
let me continue. I guess we'll play more in the
next maybe in the final half hour of the show.
Let's get back to our phones here, Let's say, how
to Carol's in California. Carol, how are you glad you called?
(21:49):
Happy Friday?
Speaker 4 (21:50):
Oh?
Speaker 7 (21:51):
Happy Friday. Hey, So yesterday I'm listening to the arguments,
the oral arguments at the Supremes. I'm listening to Barrett
with her hypotheticals private presidential, private presidential, and so I'm like,
you've got to be kidding me. He absolutely was in
his presidential capacity. Jim Jordan went over it, the Great
(22:11):
One went over it last night. And we know this
because after jan six you know, the FBI, Homeland Capitol Police,
it all came out that they had been barraged with Intel.
Way before January sixth. In fact, the FBI had a
Red Cell report called Analysis Potential of Scenarios for Reactions
of a Domestic Violent Extremists to a disputed twenty twenty
(22:34):
US presidential election a week before the election that I'm
suspect with wait a minute, my ten halfs falling off.
Could that have been that the FBI knew who was
going to win the election. But the significance of it
was that the report predicted violence, but that law enforcement
preemption would hinder widespread violence. So Nancy Pelosi the capital,
(22:56):
here we go. Capital chief Pittman testified that on January fifth,
they had intel that the capital was a target. Did
they accept the offers that Trump had authorized, not just
said hey, call him up and see if they want
the guard over there he authorized. We know that from
cash Betel's testimony that they still refused the guard. They
(23:16):
failed to lock down. Yeah, they gave him some extra
guns and all this is coming through. So my point
is this President Trump exercised his First Amendment rights. He
has a right to do that, and he went redressed
to courts. Of course, the left wing media constantly says that, oh,
the courts decided that there was no election fraud. That's crap.
(23:37):
Every one of those cases was dismissed on procedural grounds,
mainly jurisdiction. They were never adjudicated on the marriage and
he owed a duty to his seventy five million voters
to find out what happened here and let us know.
And that's exactly what he did. We all know, we've
all said it before, we've read the transcript. He did
not incite anything. He explained the constitutionality of what Mike
(24:00):
Pence should have done, which was to send back the electorals,
but it didn't get done. And of course he told
people to peacefully protest, let your voices be peacefully heard.
So I say that there's no way that he could
have incited because the insurrection had already been well known
(24:20):
to FBI, Homeland and to the Capitol Police way before
January sixth, And it's an impossibility that he incited anything.
And he absolutely was the president on that day. And
it's just sickening that we have to waste our time
and resources all the time listening to a justice trying
(24:41):
to sit there and think maybe, oh, maybe he was
in his private capacity. But anyway, you know, I digress here,
you know, But oh what's Biden doing?
Speaker 4 (24:50):
Oh?
Speaker 7 (24:51):
Oh, we have all the campus riots and anti semitism.
Is he out there people? No?
Speaker 1 (25:01):
No?
Speaker 7 (25:01):
No, is he being presidential?
Speaker 1 (25:04):
No?
Speaker 4 (25:04):
No?
Speaker 7 (25:05):
Why Sean. I'll tell you why, because as soon as
we get closer to the election, they're going to use
these riots. They're gonna get ramped up. Sorrows is gonna
jump a bunch of money in there, and we're gonna
have martial law and it's going to be raining.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Ballace not sure about martial law, but I'll tell you this.
Speaker 2 (25:20):
I mean, why isn't well, why isn't he standing firmly
against radical Islamic terrorism. That's not that's not an issue
that needs moral ambiguity. Let me see, they killed twelve
hundred Israelis. They beheaded and children, and men and women
and children. They took men, women and children hostage. They
(25:40):
were raping people. It's on videotape. They have killed some
of the hostages. They've been firing tens of thousands of
rockets into Israel. There's no moral ambiguity here. One should
have moral clarity to stand and just offer support. I'm
not asking for a single thing from Biden, but how
about just support Israel winning their war against radical terrorists.
(26:04):
But you know what, he's gutless, and he's cowardly, and
he's afraid of his base. He got scared to death
when they saw the numbers that came out of the
great state of Michigan, and in that particular Democratic presidential primary,
he did horribly and he lost eighteen point nine percent
of voters in the Democratic primary to uncommitted over one
(26:25):
hundred thousand votes. And he needs these radicals if he
wants to be elected president, and that trumps everything. No
pun intended anyway, Carol, appreciate the call. God bless you.
Quick break right back. More of your phone call straight
ahead this Friday, eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn,
as we continue Father's Day graduation season around the corner.
And I'm not saying this, my kids can get me
(26:47):
a Henry, but I wouldn't mind it if they got it. Anyway,
If you're looking for a great gift, you got to
check out the personalized receiver covers from our friends at
Henry Repeating Arms. They are available for Henry's Golden Boy
in Golden Boys Silver rifles which come in three calibers
twenty two long rifle, twenty two magnum seventeen hm R.
Now you just go to HENRYUSA dot com. One word
(27:08):
HENRYUSA dot com, type personalized in the search box. It's simple.
Then you find the link to the product page. They'll
give you step by step instructions and they will engrave
any message you want up to twenty words, and the
process is easy, it's affordable, and it makes it a
really special gift for a dad or a grad. And
(27:29):
by the way, these Henry's they're amazing. They are two
hundred rifle shotguns revolvers to choose from. I mean, the
craftsmanship is second to none. They have a lifetime guarantee,
they're made in America. I mean, it's a great gift.
And be sure when you go to HENRYUSA dot com
get their free catalog, free decals, and a list of
dealers where you are HENRYUSA dot com. Go there now,
(27:53):
and you're gonna love this company. I love this company.
Speaker 5 (28:00):
Some final hour of the Sean Hannity Show is up next.
Hang on for Sean's conservative solutions.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
Right back to our busy telephones. Eight hundred and ninety
four one, Shawn, Who's a number? Charlotte, New Orleans Next
Sean Hannity Show. By the way, for those that have
never been to New Orleans, whatever you do, you might
be young and experienced, and you're not. You know somebody's
gonna try and talk you into drinking a Hurricane. There
are two drinks, and I say this as an experienced
(28:35):
bartender who did it for years, there are two drinks
you should never ever go near. One would be a
Long Island iced tea. The other one would be a Hurricane.
Speaker 1 (28:45):
Am I right? Or am I wrong? Charlotte?
Speaker 8 (28:48):
What I would say is, don't drink two drink one's okay,
drinking too there might be.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Okay even one.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
You could start puking up because they mix all these
different liquors and all the You can't have that much
sugar in your alcohol without really feeling crappy the next day.
I'm just trying to give any drinking one on one
advice to people that drink, and I would urge you
never to over indulge anything.
Speaker 4 (29:11):
That's true.
Speaker 8 (29:12):
But you can do that here on food, fun everything.
Speaker 7 (29:15):
Quite honestly, it's the genes Qua.
Speaker 1 (29:18):
Oh, it's wild, the New Orleans. I've been there.
Speaker 7 (29:21):
Well, listen.
Speaker 8 (29:22):
The reason I was calling I wanted to discuss what
I'm using. The acronym brats, these people on the college
campuses whose behavior reduces autonomy of thought and speech, and
them obscuring the facts between Hamas and pro Palestinian and
try to make some distinctions, because even in the media
(29:45):
they're doing the same. They're removing the word Hamas and
saying pro Palestinian and this war is not against Israel
in Palestine, this war is against Israel and Hamas my mood.
The President of Palestine says Hamas does not right present Palestine. Similarly,
I'll tell you the Nazis don't represent Germans. Hama is
(30:07):
an Arab Islamic militant terrorist group.
Speaker 2 (30:11):
Well, they have a charter that calls for the destruction
of Israel. And by the way, they were voted into
power by the Palestinian groups.
Speaker 1 (30:18):
I was watching the Son of Hamasa.
Speaker 2 (30:20):
He's been a guest on this program, and he points
out that a lot of Palestinians have allegiances to a
lot of different Islamic jihad and other groups involved in terror.
But remember they were voted in last time they had elections,
and a recent poll showed seventy percent of Palestinian support Habas.
And you know, maybe they have no choice, but they
(30:42):
do well.
Speaker 8 (30:43):
I would disagree with that. And you know, Hamas is
not the only armed group that operates within Palestine's territory.
There are at least five Palestinian militia groups.
Speaker 2 (30:57):
Well, there are various factions of Islamic Jihad all within
in the Gaza area. You know, remember Israel's gotten.
Speaker 8 (31:06):
Really responsible for managing all the civil affairs.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
Yeah, I've always looked at the Iron Dome as a
temporary band aid. I mean, they've they literally have taken
down tens of thousands of rockets being fired into Israel.
Speaker 1 (31:20):
But that's not the answer.
Speaker 2 (31:22):
The answer is they're not allowed to fire any more
rockets at Israel without getting their asses kicked.
Speaker 1 (31:29):
That's it.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
That's the that's the only that's the only way it's
gonna stop. And in the North, in Lebanon and Hezbola,
same thing. And if Iran fires rockets again, they need
to be hit even harder. And I'll tell you, I'm
gonna say this civilization right now, is that the is
hanging in the balance here. If the Iranians, who have
(31:52):
been funding and and fighting these proxy wars with Tomas
and Hezballah through the Houti rebels, if they ever get
nuclear weapons, it is almost a certainty in my mind.
And we could see this in my lifetime in your lifetime,
that they're going to use them and the world will
be reconfigured in ways we can't even imagine today. And
(32:13):
if you don't think it can happen, just remember I
wrote a book, deliver Us from Evil in two thousand
and four about and I went through the history of
Mao China, Stalin Russia, Hitler, Germany, Mussolini fascism, Tojo Japan,
Pole Pot, the Killing Fields Cambodia. I've been through all
of it. Over one hundred million dead people in the
(32:34):
last century. Just keep that number in your head, and
when you think it can happen again, it can. And
we're seeing anti Semitism that I never thought we'd see
in our life. Hearing it in the halls of Congress,
college campuses around all around Europe and around the world. Scary,
it's frightening, it's evil in our time. We better pay
(32:55):
attention to it. I know I've got long wind that
I apologize for that. Eight hundred and ninety four one.
Shawn is our number if you want to be a
part of the program. On a calm October night, Michael
and his wife, they were just out for a walk
in their neighborhood when their life got flipped upside down,
or just like yours could be. Now, Michael was attacked
by a homeless woman who stabbed him multiple times before
(33:17):
he was able to restrain her and waited for law
enforcement to arrive. But what happens next is why our
partners at the USCCA exist.
Speaker 1 (33:26):
Now.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
While Michael was in the hospital, a detective literally charged
him with assault. Now this is the new America that
we're living in. Luckily, Michael was a us CCA member
just like me. He used his training, his education, and
his self defense liability insurance to stay out of jail
and save his family from potential bankruptcy. If you want
to learn proven ways to deter criminals, defend your family
(33:49):
avoid legal trouble, just go to USCCA dot com slash
Annity right now. You'll put in your email. You'll get
a free guide put together by the USCCA and the
former head of training for the FBI. Just go to
U s c c A dot com slash Hannity Today
All right, thanks Scott.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Shown an hour two Sean Hannity Show this Friday, eight
hundred and ninety four one. Shawn is on number if
you want to be a part of the program. Well,
one of the most important investigations that Congress is undertaking
now is the weaponization of the Department of Justice. How
the Department of Justice under Joe Biden is when weaponized
and politicized. We saw this ridiculous civil trial take place,
(00:26):
all of course led by an ag in New York
that made a promise to go after one man, one family,
one organization, and that's Leticia James. Now we see another
in this case, a da going after Donald Trump. One man,
one person, one organization, one family, and his promise to
investigate Trump as New York Manhattan, New York City District Attorney.
(00:49):
He said this as a candidate. Listen, whoever has this job,
are they going to convict Donald Trump?
Speaker 3 (00:56):
That is the number one if thank you, we know
he's investigating. I'm the candidate in the race who has
the experience with Donald Trump. I was the chief deputy
in the Attorney General's office. We sued the Trump administration
over one hundred times for the Muslim travel band, for
family separation at the border, for Shenanigans with the census,
(01:19):
so I know how to litigate with him. I also
led the team that did the Trump Foundation case. I
believe we have to hold him accountable. I haven't seen
all the facts beyond the public but I've litigated with him,
and so I'm prepared to go where the facts take
me once I see them, and hold him accountable.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
The facts as he sees them.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
They already made a determination long before, which is one
of the problems.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Anyway.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
Thankfully, we have people in Congress like Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan.
He is the chairman of the all important House Judiciary Committee.
Among their many investigations, they have been looking into the FBI,
the doj of Joe Biden, and whether it's been politicized
and weaponized. They recently released what is called the Anatomy
of a political prosecution, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office vendetta
(02:09):
against President Donald Trump, their interim staff report, and we
welcome back Jim Jordan with us over three hundred pages long.
That means you got a lot, You have a lot
to tell here.
Speaker 4 (02:20):
Yeah, and I love the part you just played sean
of Alvin Bragg bragging about, you know, one hundred times
he'd went after President Trump. So that's what he said
when he ran for the job. But here's the kicker.
This case was so bad even Alvin Bragg wasn't going
to bring it. I mean, the Department of Justice looked
at this. He said, we're not going to bring a case.
As the Federal Elections Commission, We're not going to bring case.
Si Vans, Alvin Bragg's predecessor, he wasn't going to bring
(02:41):
a case. Alvin Bragg, Bragg's back going after President Trump
gets elect it takes a look at this case and says,
I'm not going to bring it either. There's nothing here.
And then one of his assistants, one of his assistant
DA's Mark Pomerantz, resigns, writes a book, does a media tour,
and all that pressure from the left, that's what's convinced
Alvin back to finally bring this ridiculous case. And as
(03:03):
we're watching it over the last day day, we see
how bad it is and how it's all falling apart.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
Well, we see it's all falling apart. I don't I
still believe that I'm right that I don't think Donald
Trump can get a fair trial as it relates to
any New York courtroom. I hope I'm proven wrong. I'm
hopeful that at least one juror. I'm hoping at best
maybe for a hung jury. But you know, you see
what is what is happening here, And you know one
(03:29):
of the things Greg Jarrett wrote about this is he
called it, you know, the filth By Association is the
Da Braggs legal strategy. And they start with the former
publisher of the National Inquirer and this catch and killed
practice that he has used for I guess a bunch
of other people in the past, which, by the way,
nothing is illegal. The top prosecutor in this case quit.
(03:52):
I think he was the third ranking official in Joe
Biden's Justice Department, Matthew, I don't know how to Yeah, Glangelo, Okay,
thank you. But he's the one that gave opening arguments.
He left his job, which was fairly prestigious at the
Justice Department just to go after Donald Trump on behalf
(04:13):
of Biden's Justice department. Do we not see a conflict
of interest there? How many times was Fannie Willis at
Biden's White House meeting with White House counsel. How many
times did other people go to the White House and
coordinate with these people?
Speaker 1 (04:26):
I mean it stinks to how you heaven?
Speaker 4 (04:28):
Yeah, col Angelo is out to get the president. Palmerant
who wrote the book. Remember Palmerant, he wasn't paid, he
was an assistant DA. In fact, he says in his book,
I would have paid to go after President Trump. So
he said, when I negotiate, my salary was easy because
I would have paid to do this. They didn't have
to pay me. That's how much these people are biased.
And here's here's the thing. The crime, the so called
(04:49):
crime Alvin Bragg is saying, is that, oh, President Trump,
there's some some the business records weren't exactly right, according
to Alvin Bragg, and that was part of this effort
to conspire to obstruct and impede the twenty sixteen elections.
And then you think about what else happened yesterday Jack Smith.
That case is in front of the Supreme Court and
they were arguing. Jack Smith is arguing the climb is
(05:11):
conspiring to impact the twenty twenty election. The real conspiracy,
seems to me, is between Alvin Bragg, Fani Willison Jack Smith.
They're all conspiring to influence the twenty twenty four elections.
That's the real conspiracy. President Trump didn't do anything to
impact the twenty sixteen elections other than campaign and run
a great campaign and win. So this is to me
(05:32):
is the real takeaway. The conspiracy exists between Bragg, Smith
and willis to impact the twenty twenty four elections instead
of letting just wea the people decide.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Well, I think a conviction, which would probably say the
odds are very high, may happen in this case. I
would think that the facts would matter. But look at
how bad this has gotten. You have a judge in
this case that donated it in twenty twenty to Joe Biden.
You would think that would be a reason for accusal.
You have the accusations. The least dephonic has gone into
(06:04):
detail about them, about possible family conflicts and and how
a family would be benefiting from from the trial and
the outcome of this trial. That's a big issue. What
you have in New York are what would be a
book keeping errors. That's all this case really is about.
And at the end of the day, that is a misdemeanor.
(06:25):
But the statute of limitations along gone on charging a
misdemeanor in the case, How did they get to a
federal election law in New York City as a means
of even you know, for for that trial to take
place when Biden's own Justice Department is weaponized as it is,
they didn't even charge Donald Trump because they didn't see
a case on that front.
Speaker 4 (06:45):
Even the DJ even I Biden would wouldn't bring this
this case. Yeah, again underscore the political focus, the lawfair
focus from today's labs out to get President Trump. And
again this case it's so bad. They're also relying as
their key witness Michael Cohen, convicted perjurer Michael Cohen. Michael
(07:07):
Cohen who when he came to for the United States
Congress lied six times under oath. We did a referral
for that four years ago when he came in front
of Congress. That's their star witness in this particular case.
So again the escalation of what they've done, what the
left has done, what government has done to President Trump,
all the way back to sixteen when they spied on
his campaign. Then it was the Mueller investigation. Nineteen lawyers,
(07:31):
forty ages, thirty million, dollars. Then it was impeachment, Then
it was raiding his home. Then it was Jacksmith named
special counsel. Two indictments from Jacksmith, Bonnie Wilson, Georgia, Albin
Bragg here in New York. Then it was the Fourteenth Amendment,
and now this case actually going to trial. And then
the trial they're saying, gag order on President Trump. We
may not even tell you who the witnesses are going
to be called on each day at the trial. We
(07:52):
may not do what we always do. And then this
is how bad has gotten. And my God tells me
they're going to probably try something else that we don't
know about yet because we're still six months away from
the election.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Well, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
I mean, if we're listening to oral arguments yesterday, I
would say that Jack Smith was probably very disappointed with
the questioning of the Supreme Court justices at the end. Now,
I don't think the justices will go with absolute immunity.
I never thought that was the way it should have
been argued. I'm not a lawyer, but after interviewing all
the attorneys that I know that I respect, the consensus
(08:28):
was that it should be limited immunity that would have
covered any issues that Jack Smith was investigating. But without
a doubt, there's no way. I don't see a way
that that trial gets moving. The Fannie Willis case is stalled,
and I believe the document cases is stalled. You went
into a lot of detail about how Bragg, for example,
(08:50):
is disregard for violent crime. You went into a lot
of detail about the about this man Pomeranz and why
in his deposition and he would do this for free,
And in his deposition he declined to answer most questions.
What was going on behind the scenes.
Speaker 4 (09:05):
Oh, he took the fifth so many times during we release.
That's why we released this transcript, just to show this
is the guy who was the catalyst for Alvin Bragg
to ultimately bring this case, the case that he didn't
want to bring and no one else would bring. This
was the guy. And then when he came we had
to subpoena him to come testify. He fought it, it
went to court, the court said no, you got to
testify for good to take He wrote a book about it.
(09:25):
And then when we bring him in for the deposition,
he takes the fifth. I don't know how many times,
but more times than we can count, more times than
we can remember. So, yeah, that's the basis of this
whole thing. He called it the Zombie case, the case
that had been dead no one, but they brought it
back to life because of his public pressure on Alvin
Bragg the DA there in Manhattan.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Did you ever get a chance to go through this
book because you called the z He called it the
zombie case, and you discussed in your report how he
shifted through many novel, untested legal theories in search of
a crime, and how his politicized reliance on is basically
the main witness as you mentioned earlier, Michael Cohen and
(10:08):
Pomerantz's personal animus towards an obsession towards all things Donald Trump.
I mean, it would just be like, why would anybody
leave the Justice Department if you're the third highest ranking
official to go argue a case in New York City
against his boss's number one rival political rival.
Speaker 4 (10:26):
Yeah, Colangelo leads the Justice Department high ranking position to
go after President Trump. Palm Arantz goes and works for
the DA, takes no salary all to go after President Trump.
This is all political. And there were some members of
the DA's officers said we can't have Michael Cohen as
the star witness in this case. And yet Palmarantz pushboard
(10:48):
and ultimately that's what Bragg's doing. And Michael Cohen is
going to be on the stand here in one of
the upcoming days, and we will hear from a guy
who has done nothing but lie about the President I
don't know, for the last four five years.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
I mean, pretty unbelievable. All right, quick break more with
the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan on
the other side. All right, we continue with Jim Jordan,
Ohio Congressman. He is the chairman of the all important
House Judiciary Committee. The scary part of this, and this
kind of came up a little bit in the immunity
oral arguments yesterday in the Supreme Court is at one point,
(11:23):
I don't remember which justice brought up the point that, well,
if a president appoints an attorney general, that pretty much
lets them do anything at that point. There really isn't
any law at that point, it really doesn't matter. And
so I think that's an argument for limited immunity. I mean, otherwise,
will we prosecute Barack Obama for drone strikes that killed
(11:45):
the Americans, would we prosecute George W. Bush because the
information and intel he used to justify the war in
Iraq didn't pan out some of it.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
In the end, you know, where does this all end?
Speaker 2 (11:58):
That every president now has a filtered, very difficult decision
make decisions through the prism of whether or not he's
going to face a jury when he leaves office.
Speaker 4 (12:09):
Right right now, the courts are then clear. In the
past they said a president has to be able to
fearlessly and then partially conduct the duties of his office.
So because if he's got this, this this criminal liability
hanging over his head, he just won't be able to function.
And there are two basic elements. Was he president, yes,
of course President Trump was president at the time. And
was he engaged in official duties? And of course he was.
They're trying to say his official duties and looking into
(12:31):
what was this election done the way it was supposed
to be done, they're trying to say that was somehow criminal.
They're trying to say that he was involved in a
conspiracy to obstruct the official proceeding, which is with January sixth,
that is just not accurate, just not true. So that's
how weak that case is as well. And I do
think what's likely to happen is, as you said, Urshan,
the Supreme Court sends it back to the lower court
(12:54):
and there'll be a fact intensive approach to looking at
all this the subject matter, all the facts there that's
going to take while. You know what was interesting yesterday
is every headline I saw was, oh, this is going
to take times, that goes back to the lower court
and we will not get a decision before the election.
Well why is before the election so darn important to
the left. I think that just underscores what we've been saying,
(13:14):
This is all political. The focus should be on how
does the immunity totally impact the President of the United
States so he can do his job and getting the
right answer there and getting to the facts, not some
political motive, which is exactly what the left has. And
you see that by every thinking headline in the mainstream
media was oh, it may not get done now until
until after the election, which you can just see them
(13:35):
all like disappointed that they're not going to happen.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Did you know the reason?
Speaker 2 (13:38):
If they had their way, Donald Trump would be forced
to stay in a court room for the next one
hundred and ninety two days. Unfortunately, the latest poll Morning
Consult Bloomberg poll shows Donald Trump, you know, winning six
out of seven swing states by some of the largest
margins he's had so far.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
Maybe it's working out.
Speaker 2 (13:59):
And Joe Biden is out there talking about accountables, eating
uncle Bose and of course saying four more years pause,
So maybe that's not such a bad thing.
Speaker 4 (14:10):
Yeah, I pretty soon it'd be back to telling corn
pop stories and who knows what else. Now, that's actually sad.
It's actually sad that the commander and tea for the
greatest country in history is reads from the teleprompter and
actually says the word pause.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
I mean, it's he's a cognitive mess.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
I'll say it for you. I got to ask your
last question. I'm just looking at the clock report Daily Mail.
Thirteen banks working with the Biden administration and their FBI
to spy on Trump's supporters. Do you know about this
and how how deep did they? Did they get a
warren for spying?
Speaker 4 (14:43):
No, they turned over information without any process. We first
saw this from Bank of America with one of the
FBI whistleblowers that you were so helpful and working with
us on and let their stories be told. And now
we realize it's much broader. So we've done a ton
of letters, we've done subpoenas to certain banks, and we've
gotten on information. We're going to continue to get that information.
But it looks like they were looking for any debit
(15:04):
card credit card purchases in and around January sixth, and
then overlaying that information with anyone who may have purchased
a firearm, which is unbelievable direct the violation of people's
fundamental living.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
Eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn is a number
if you want to be a part of the program Accountable.
Speaker 5 (15:23):
Sean gets the answers no one else does. America deserves
and know the truth about Congress all.
Speaker 2 (15:33):
Right, twenty five to the top of the are your
calls coming up? So wasn't a good week for Joe
Biden on the campaign trail. At least they didn't bring
up Uncle Posey again. But he did have my favorite moment,
which is four more years pause, which now they put
in the White House transcript inaudible, was very audible, and
then he claimed at one point this week, we have
(15:54):
the strongest economy in the world, listen to him.
Speaker 6 (15:57):
It's clear we have the strongest economy in the world.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
That's a fact.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
Okay, maybe Joe didn't see the GDP numbers that came
out yesterday, but they were an unmitigated disaster. On top
of the inflation number CPI wholesale price into all of
them up a whopping three and a half percent from
a year over year from last year alone. You know,
all those rate cut hikes everybody was thinking about. No,
(16:24):
not rate cuts that there were. People thought, it's not happening.
It's not going to happen. That is not worth where
the economy is one point six percent GDP is a disaster.
Three point five percent year over year, a consumer price index,
the inflation indicator, No, that's a disaster too. One point
seven million full time jobs have disappeared in the past
(16:47):
five months, according to government data. Mortgage rates now people
have been hoping they've been coming down a little bit,
and unfortunately now they're on their way back up. Because
there were mortgage companies assuming that the rate cuts that
Jerome Powell had promised, the numerous ones were actually going
to happen.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
But it's not going to happen.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
It looks like we're heading more towards stagflation than ever before.
And then the worst number of all I talked about yesterday,
and it was at twenty six percent of our fellow
Americans telling Gallop they are struggling to afford food and
have struggled over the past year. And seventy percent of
respondents to the Bloomberg Pole say the economy is on
the wrong track. No wonder Trump is now winning in
(17:31):
swing states by large margins, according to the Bloomberg Morning
Console poll I had in New Wisconsin, in Arizona and Georgia, Pennsylvania,
North Carolina, and Nevada. Yeah, that all matters. Pretty unbelievable anyway,
I've not heard the entire interview, only clips that my
(17:51):
team has been able to pull off from online. About
I guess Joe Biden was on Howard Stern today. I
can tell you so many friends that grew up. If
you grew up in New York, you listen to Howard start.
I mean, I mean he was iconoclastic, irreverent, a true original,
very talented, very gifted, and now he's bragging that he's woke.
(18:12):
I don't know what happened. I don't know what happened.
Why did he get so freaked out over COVID? And
he managed to duck and dodge it by I guess
hibernating in his house forever. But that didn't work out well.
He ended up getting COVID like everybody else. And thank god.
He's okay. I mean, but a very gifted, talented broadcaster
that clearly is not the same guy that he once was.
(18:33):
It's kind of disappointing. It's it's you know, all those
construction guys that were cheering Trump and four more years
we love Trump. They were Howard Stern listeners back in
the day. I don't know if they're listening to him anymore.
I know a lot of my friends that grew up
listening to him. Unfortunately, they just said they get you know,
they're just disappointed. They feel like, you know, a friend
(18:54):
of theirs, somebody that shared their values and stood up
with them, is not the same person anymore. He still talented,
he's still gifted, he's still a great broadcaster, but you know,
now he'd rather interview Hillary Clinton and Lena Durham and
uh lord, it's her name, Lena, what's Lena whatever? Her
name is Dunham whatever, one day I turned it on.
(19:14):
I'm like, oh my gosh, you gotta be kidding me.
Now it's Joe Biden. And by the way, Joe Biden
tells Stern that he got arrested standing on a porch
with with a black family during civil rights protest. Well,
I wish Howard had watch my show because he would
have known that Joe Biden actually partnered with the former
(19:36):
Klansman Robert KKK Byrd and that together they tried to
stop bussing and integration because Joe Biden, in his words,
didn't want public schools to become racial jungles. But he's
telling a tall tale here.
Speaker 6 (19:51):
Listen, she said, Jolley, let me, And I looked at
my mom and says, honey, you Sandy six. She said, Joey,
let me remember true stories. I remember every when they
were desegregating Lynnfield, the neighborhood was uh uh you know,
seventy homes built at suburbia And I told you, and
there was a black family moving in, and there was
people who were down there protesting. I told you not
(20:14):
to go down there, and you went down remember that,
and you came you got to rest up. He standing
on the on the porch with a black family. Right,
they brought you back the police and I said, yeah,
well I remember that.
Speaker 2 (20:24):
Then he told Howard that women would send him very
salacious pictures back at his early senates and he's give
them to the Secret Service.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
I don't I don't even believe that story.
Speaker 6 (20:35):
But Lissa, when I met when I met Jill, I
I was when I lost my family. Uh, I got
put in that ten most eliguba Batchelor's list were.
Speaker 1 (20:45):
The United States Senator.
Speaker 6 (20:47):
And so and and a lot of lovely women. But uh,
women would send very salacious pictures, and I just give
him to the Secret Service. I thought somebody think I.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Was a couple of more cuts out of this. Uh.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
Joe Biden tells stirring the Trump is the guy in
the neighborhood you wish you could have gotten in the
neighborhood and meet head to head. The guy can't walk
up the big boy stairs to Air Force one anymore.
Speaker 1 (21:13):
What the what is he talking about? I'll take him
ahead of the gym.
Speaker 6 (21:17):
But like for example, you know, I mean Trump makes
fun of me. Right, He's the kind of guy in
the neighbor I wish you could have gotten to the
neighbor head to head anyway.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
Now, by the way, Donald Trump did respond to this,
and yeah, they're really happy about that. They said, yeah,
we're in. They can't wait. When can we set it up? Anyway,
let me continue. I guess we'll play more in the
next maybe in the final half hour of the show.
Let's get back to our phones here, Let's say, how
to Carol's in California. Carol, how are you glad you called?
(21:49):
Happy Friday?
Speaker 4 (21:50):
Oh?
Speaker 7 (21:51):
Happy Friday. Hey, So yesterday I'm listening to the arguments,
the oral arguments at the Supremes. I'm listening to Barrett
with her hypotheticals private presidential, private presidential, and so I'm like,
you've got to be kidding me. He absolutely was in
his presidential capacity. Jim Jordan went over it, the Great
(22:11):
One went over it last night. And we know this
because after jan six you know, the FBI, Homeland Capitol Police,
it all came out that they had been barraged with Intel.
Way before January sixth. In fact, the FBI had a
Red Cell report called Analysis Potential of Scenarios for Reactions
of a Domestic Violent Extremists to a disputed twenty twenty
(22:34):
US presidential election a week before the election that I'm
suspect with wait a minute, my ten halfs falling off.
Could that have been that the FBI knew who was
going to win the election. But the significance of it
was that the report predicted violence, but that law enforcement
preemption would hinder widespread violence. So Nancy Pelosi the capital,
(22:56):
here we go. Capital chief Pittman testified that on January fifth,
they had intel that the capital was a target. Did
they accept the offers that Trump had authorized, not just
said hey, call him up and see if they want
the guard over there he authorized. We know that from
cash Betel's testimony that they still refused the guard. They
(23:16):
failed to lock down. Yeah, they gave him some extra
guns and all this is coming through. So my point
is this President Trump exercised his First Amendment rights. He
has a right to do that, and he went redressed
to courts. Of course, the left wing media constantly says that, oh,
the courts decided that there was no election fraud. That's crap.
(23:37):
Every one of those cases was dismissed on procedural grounds,
mainly jurisdiction. They were never adjudicated on the marriage and
he owed a duty to his seventy five million voters
to find out what happened here and let us know.
And that's exactly what he did. We all know, we've
all said it before, we've read the transcript. He did
not incite anything. He explained the constitutionality of what Mike
(24:00):
Pence should have done, which was to send back the electorals,
but it didn't get done. And of course he told
people to peacefully protest, let your voices be peacefully heard.
So I say that there's no way that he could
have incited because the insurrection had already been well known
(24:20):
to FBI, Homeland and to the Capitol Police way before
January sixth, And it's an impossibility that he incited anything.
And he absolutely was the president on that day. And
it's just sickening that we have to waste our time
and resources all the time listening to a justice trying
(24:41):
to sit there and think maybe, oh, maybe he was
in his private capacity. But anyway, you know, I digress here,
you know, But oh what's Biden doing?
Speaker 4 (24:50):
Oh?
Speaker 7 (24:51):
Oh, we have all the campus riots and anti semitism.
Is he out there people? No?
Speaker 1 (25:01):
No?
Speaker 7 (25:01):
No, is he being presidential?
Speaker 1 (25:04):
No?
Speaker 4 (25:04):
No?
Speaker 7 (25:05):
Why Sean. I'll tell you why, because as soon as
we get closer to the election, they're going to use
these riots. They're gonna get ramped up. Sorrows is gonna
jump a bunch of money in there, and we're gonna
have martial law and it's going to be raining.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Ballace not sure about martial law, but I'll tell you this.
Speaker 2 (25:20):
I mean, why isn't well, why isn't he standing firmly
against radical Islamic terrorism. That's not that's not an issue
that needs moral ambiguity. Let me see, they killed twelve
hundred Israelis. They beheaded and children, and men and women
and children. They took men, women and children hostage. They
(25:40):
were raping people. It's on videotape. They have killed some
of the hostages. They've been firing tens of thousands of
rockets into Israel. There's no moral ambiguity here. One should
have moral clarity to stand and just offer support. I'm
not asking for a single thing from Biden, but how
about just support Israel winning their war against radical terrorists.
(26:04):
But you know what, he's gutless, and he's cowardly, and
he's afraid of his base. He got scared to death
when they saw the numbers that came out of the
great state of Michigan, and in that particular Democratic presidential primary,
he did horribly and he lost eighteen point nine percent
of voters in the Democratic primary to uncommitted over one
(26:25):
hundred thousand votes. And he needs these radicals if he
wants to be elected president, and that trumps everything. No
pun intended anyway, Carol, appreciate the call. God bless you.
Quick break right back. More of your phone call straight
ahead this Friday, eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn,
as we continue Father's Day graduation season around the corner.
And I'm not saying this, my kids can get me
(26:47):
a Henry, but I wouldn't mind it if they got it. Anyway,
If you're looking for a great gift, you got to
check out the personalized receiver covers from our friends at
Henry Repeating Arms. They are available for Henry's Golden Boy
in Golden Boys Silver rifles which come in three calibers
twenty two long rifle, twenty two magnum seventeen hm R.
Now you just go to HENRYUSA dot com. One word
(27:08):
HENRYUSA dot com, type personalized in the search box. It's simple.
Then you find the link to the product page. They'll
give you step by step instructions and they will engrave
any message you want up to twenty words, and the
process is easy, it's affordable, and it makes it a
really special gift for a dad or a grad. And
(27:29):
by the way, these Henry's they're amazing. They are two
hundred rifle shotguns revolvers to choose from. I mean, the
craftsmanship is second to none. They have a lifetime guarantee,
they're made in America. I mean, it's a great gift.
And be sure when you go to HENRYUSA dot com
get their free catalog, free decals, and a list of
dealers where you are HENRYUSA dot com. Go there now,
(27:53):
and you're gonna love this company. I love this company.
Speaker 5 (28:00):
Some final hour of the Sean Hannity Show is up next.
Hang on for Sean's conservative solutions.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
Right back to our busy telephones. Eight hundred and ninety
four one, Shawn, Who's a number? Charlotte, New Orleans Next
Sean Hannity Show. By the way, for those that have
never been to New Orleans, whatever you do, you might
be young and experienced, and you're not. You know somebody's
gonna try and talk you into drinking a Hurricane. There
are two drinks, and I say this as an experienced
(28:35):
bartender who did it for years, there are two drinks
you should never ever go near. One would be a
Long Island iced tea. The other one would be a Hurricane.
Speaker 1 (28:45):
Am I right? Or am I wrong? Charlotte?
Speaker 8 (28:48):
What I would say is, don't drink two drink one's okay,
drinking too there might be.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Okay even one.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
You could start puking up because they mix all these
different liquors and all the You can't have that much
sugar in your alcohol without really feeling crappy the next day.
I'm just trying to give any drinking one on one
advice to people that drink, and I would urge you
never to over indulge anything.
Speaker 4 (29:11):
That's true.
Speaker 8 (29:12):
But you can do that here on food, fun everything.
Speaker 7 (29:15):
Quite honestly, it's the genes Qua.
Speaker 1 (29:18):
Oh, it's wild, the New Orleans. I've been there.
Speaker 7 (29:21):
Well, listen.
Speaker 8 (29:22):
The reason I was calling I wanted to discuss what
I'm using. The acronym brats, these people on the college
campuses whose behavior reduces autonomy of thought and speech, and
them obscuring the facts between Hamas and pro Palestinian and
try to make some distinctions, because even in the media
(29:45):
they're doing the same. They're removing the word Hamas and
saying pro Palestinian and this war is not against Israel
in Palestine, this war is against Israel and Hamas my mood.
The President of Palestine says Hamas does not right present Palestine. Similarly,
I'll tell you the Nazis don't represent Germans. Hama is
(30:07):
an Arab Islamic militant terrorist group.
Speaker 2 (30:11):
Well, they have a charter that calls for the destruction
of Israel. And by the way, they were voted into
power by the Palestinian groups.
Speaker 1 (30:18):
I was watching the Son of Hamasa.
Speaker 2 (30:20):
He's been a guest on this program, and he points
out that a lot of Palestinians have allegiances to a
lot of different Islamic jihad and other groups involved in terror.
But remember they were voted in last time they had elections,
and a recent poll showed seventy percent of Palestinian support Habas.
And you know, maybe they have no choice, but they
(30:42):
do well.
Speaker 8 (30:43):
I would disagree with that. And you know, Hamas is
not the only armed group that operates within Palestine's territory.
There are at least five Palestinian militia groups.
Speaker 2 (30:57):
Well, there are various factions of Islamic Jihad all within
in the Gaza area. You know, remember Israel's gotten.
Speaker 8 (31:06):
Really responsible for managing all the civil affairs.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
Yeah, I've always looked at the Iron Dome as a
temporary band aid. I mean, they've they literally have taken
down tens of thousands of rockets being fired into Israel.
Speaker 1 (31:20):
But that's not the answer.
Speaker 2 (31:22):
The answer is they're not allowed to fire any more
rockets at Israel without getting their asses kicked.
Speaker 1 (31:29):
That's it.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
That's the that's the only that's the only way it's
gonna stop. And in the North, in Lebanon and Hezbola,
same thing. And if Iran fires rockets again, they need
to be hit even harder. And I'll tell you, I'm
gonna say this civilization right now, is that the is
hanging in the balance here. If the Iranians, who have
(31:52):
been funding and and fighting these proxy wars with Tomas
and Hezballah through the Houti rebels, if they ever get
nuclear weapons, it is almost a certainty in my mind.
And we could see this in my lifetime in your lifetime,
that they're going to use them and the world will
be reconfigured in ways we can't even imagine today. And
(32:13):
if you don't think it can happen, just remember I
wrote a book, deliver Us from Evil in two thousand
and four about and I went through the history of
Mao China, Stalin Russia, Hitler, Germany, Mussolini fascism, Tojo Japan,
Pole Pot, the Killing Fields Cambodia. I've been through all
of it. Over one hundred million dead people in the
(32:34):
last century. Just keep that number in your head, and
when you think it can happen again, it can. And
we're seeing anti Semitism that I never thought we'd see
in our life. Hearing it in the halls of Congress,
college campuses around all around Europe and around the world. Scary,
it's frightening, it's evil in our time. We better pay
(32:55):
attention to it. I know I've got long wind that
I apologize for that. Eight hundred and ninety four one.
Shawn is our number if you want to be a
part of the program. On a calm October night, Michael
and his wife, they were just out for a walk
in their neighborhood when their life got flipped upside down,
or just like yours could be. Now, Michael was attacked
by a homeless woman who stabbed him multiple times before
(33:17):
he was able to restrain her and waited for law
enforcement to arrive. But what happens next is why our
partners at the USCCA exist.
Speaker 1 (33:26):
Now.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
While Michael was in the hospital, a detective literally charged
him with assault. Now this is the new America that
we're living in. Luckily, Michael was a us CCA member
just like me. He used his training, his education, and
his self defense liability insurance to stay out of jail
and save his family from potential bankruptcy. If you want
to learn proven ways to deter criminals, defend your family
(33:49):
avoid legal trouble, just go to USCCA dot com slash
Annity right now. You'll put in your email. You'll get
a free guide put together by the USCCA and the
former head of training for the FBI. Just go to
U s c c A dot com slash Hannity Today
The Sean Hannity Show News
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
The Nikki Glaser Podcast
Every week comedian and infamous roaster Nikki Glaser provides a fun, fast-paced, and brutally honest look into current pop-culture and her own personal life.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.