May 9, 2024 • 32 mins
The White House handlers are now talking about President Biden's new efforts to do "quality over quantity" when it comes to press appearances and public engagement. It's obvious this is not a "quality" issue.. it's a capability issue!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
And thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all of
you for being with us. Here is our toll free
telephone number you want to be a part of the
program today, it's eight hundred nine four one Sean if
you want to join us. All things simplemental righty today
we got Senator Tim Scott today. And I don't know
what they're gonna do with Joey Biden, your president.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Now.
Speaker 1 (00:21):
Remember he had a lot of trips and falls going
up the stairs, the big boy stairs of Air Force one,
and then of course he tripped three times in a
row on one trip up the stairs, and that didn't
go particularly well. And then his staff said, well, it's
very windy outside. I'm like, well, I don't know what's worse,
the fact that he tripped three times in a row,
or that they're blaming the wind and he's so weak
(00:43):
and frail that the wind can blow over.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
The president of the United States. But whatever.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
So they've tried to eliminate that problem, and they decided, okay,
rather than use the big boy stairs, we're going to
use the little boy baby stairs in the back of
Air Force one. It's not as steep, it's not as long,
it's it's certainly not as presidential and anyway. Joe Biden
(01:09):
nearly suffered another fall earlier today after navigating the baby
stairs the little Boy stairs onto Air Force one ahead
of his campaign trip to Wisconsin. Now, he did manage
to mount the stairs, but noticeably he was wobbling before
lurching for the nearest railing to stabilize himself. After turning
(01:30):
around to then wave and salute before entering the cabin
of the presidential aircraft. The video footage captured the whole
ordeal at Joint Bas Andrews in Maryland ahead of, you know,
Biden's trip to Wisconsin. I mean, this guy just does
He's not that it's not that he's old. I mean,
(01:52):
I know people that look Bernie Sanders. I can't stand them.
I really can't stand the guy. He's a Marxist social
idiot and an arrogant soob whatever however he's he's just
as cognitively strong today as he was years ago.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
And I think he's older than Biden. Has nothing to
do with age.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
I met many older people in my life that are
sharp as attack. Again, nothing to do with age. I
know many older people that stay in shape and they've
got you know, they've got some energy in their step
and you don't have to worry about them falling.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
And I do know other people.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
For example, I was out to dinner with friends of
mine and not that long ago, and and an older
couple that I happen to think the world of. And
I know that the in this case, the wife of
of a friend of mine. You know, she seemed a
little wobbly on her feet, so I just grab her
(02:52):
arm and I kind of not an aggressive way, just
hold on to it so that if God forbid, she
wobbles or or is beginning to trip or farm more,
I don't want it to fall. And one of the
worst things that can happen to older people, whether if
they lose their stamina and their strength, is a bad fall.
You break a hip and you're in the hospital and
(03:12):
you may never get out of the hospital by the
time all his said and done. You know, even John Stuart,
John Stuart just went big time hard against Biden and
his age during a set at this year's Netflix It's
called joke Fest, and he went really hard on anti
wokeness and anyway, he said, you know, it wasn't the
first time that he's addressed the issue of Biden's age
(03:34):
and having ranted about both Biden and President Trump, you know,
during his return to the Daily Show. And anyway, he says,
I know, liberals say, don't say Joe Biden is old.
Don't say well, people see with their own eyes. By
the way, any good comic, you know, any good humor
is rooted in truth. And he goes, you can say it,
(03:56):
he can, he can't hear us. I know, I know,
you know how freaking old he is. And I know
you don't want to say it because Trump is scary,
but he's so blanking old when you watch him on television.
You're nervous, aren't you. Then he said, I'm not saying
that Biden can't contribute to society. He just shouldn't be president.
(04:18):
And he's not wrong. And this guy does not like
Donald Trump at all, one bit at all whatsoever?
Speaker 2 (04:25):
Why are we allowing this?
Speaker 1 (04:27):
He goes on to say, And you know, sometimes comedians
can really, you know, just hone in on what is truthful.
You want to know why these late night comedy shows
fallon Kimmel Colbert don't do well. I want to know
why Greg Guttfeld does so well? Is Gutfeld. He'll show
(04:47):
videos of Biden, He'll tell the truth, he'll make jokes.
He'll make jokes about Republicans too. You go back to
the heyday of Johnny Carson and Jay Leno and Letterman.
Until the later years he got pretty political political and
kind of got pretty bitter. I don't know what happening,
got pretty bitter in his older age, but anyway, it's
(05:08):
I think it hurt his ratings. And then Jay Leno,
who you know, basically you know he was he was
after kicks and giggles and laughs, and he didn't care
who he's going after, and that made him, you know,
a much more you know, watchable host than the ratings.
You know, bore that out. Anyway, what are we gonna do?
President can't even get up the stairs now. They say, well,
(05:30):
we're gonna do shorter speeches because quality is much better
than quantity. They're not doing it because they want quality
over quantity. They they're doing it because in the middle
of every speech, blah blah, that's what people hear. He's
not capable. He doesn't have the strength, the stamina, and
(05:51):
the cognitive ability to give a long speech. He could
never do a Donald Trump like rally, he's not cognitively
capable of doing such a thing, you know. But don't
worry all the mob the media, by the way, even
the media, I'll play this later in the program today,
they see this was an unmitigated disaster. What happened yesterday
(06:14):
in that New York courtroom when Stormy Daniels took to
the stand. What was so interesting And you know, it's
hard to report on this to the full extent you
want to because it's happening during the show. But you know,
after I really had time to look at all of
the notes and everything that went on during cross examination
of Stormy Daniels, it was a disaster. I mean, her
(06:37):
demeanor shifted and changed dramatically and she became angry, you know.
And I think the biggest thing to come out of
all of this is she admitted to being coached by
the prosecution.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
And are you kidding me?
Speaker 1 (06:53):
So that's what the prosecution now does that you know,
she she goes through, you know, mock session with the prosecution. Anyway,
the President's attorney asked if she met with prosecutors in
rehearsed testimony. She said no to that, and then Trump's
attorney pressed and asked if she prepared in mock cross examinations,
(07:14):
and yeah, that would be rehearse testimony. She contradicted herself
right there, and she says, yeah, we've prepared mock cross examinations.
And Stormy says they practiced, well, what is rehearse? How
is rehearse in practicing any different? When asked if they
were brutal, Stormy says the memories were hard to bring up.
(07:34):
He says, the prosecutors wanted to have all the facts,
as much information as possible, and so now we have
the prosecution. Not only did they take somebody that we
now know is a political operative that's in the third
highest ranking position at Joe Biden's weaponized Department of Justice
and take him out of that prestigious position and put
(07:57):
him in Alvin Bragg's courtroom because nobody has any faith
in album Bragg's ability to you know, prosecute anything, and
so they bring in a ringer. Basically, Joe Biden's Department
of Justice is taken over by sending this guy over there.
She admits that she hates Donald Trump, really that she
wants Donald Trump in jail. She admits about the money decision.
(08:20):
And then here's the most interesting part to me, because
we have this letter, the letters dated January thirteenth, I'm sorry,
January thirtieth, twenty eighteen.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
It signed Stormy Daniels.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
When asked about it, she says, oh, yeah, she was
put under pressure to sign that document in January of
twenty eighteen. I'm going to read the document here in
a second. The only problem is is that in her
own statement, well, it doesn't justify what she is saying
in this statement and the things that she had said
(08:56):
in all the years that have passed. You know, she says,
over the past few weeks, I've been asked countless times
to comment about reports of an alleged sexual relationship I
had with Donald Trump many many, many years ago. The
fact of the matter is, this is twenty eighteen, not
that long ago. The fact of the matter is is
that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence
(09:17):
in two thousand and six, twenty eleven, twenty and sixteen,
twenty and seventeen, and now in twenty eighteen. I'm not
denying this affair because I was paid hush money, as
has been reported in overseas own tabloids, I'm denying this
affair because it never happened. I'll have no further comment
on the matter. Check out my Instagram site. Okay, now,
(09:41):
my question is, all right, you might have been under
pressure to sign it, but you did deny it in
two thousand and six. You didn't say anybody pressured you
to deny it then or twenty eleven. Donald Trump wasn't
running for president then, or twenty sixteen, wasn't running for
president then, or twenty seventeen. You know, well at that
point he a with twenty sixteen and seventeen, he was
(10:02):
you know, running for president obviously. But and now in
twenty eighteen, and then she admits, oh yeah, she wants
to make money on all of this, and of course
wrote a book about this, you know. And then of
course that she brings up the whole idea. She was
ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal
pece fees, but she had tweeted out, I'll go to
(10:23):
jail before I ever pay a penny, And then she
confirmed it's her tweet. She says it's her saying that
she's not gonna she will not pay for telling the truth.
My motivation was I was telling the truth. And then
Trump's attorney asked if Stormy cares about the court order,
she says, of course, I care. Asked if she's gonna pay,
she says, well, I don't know. But then they brought
(10:44):
up another tweet. I don't know him, you know, Adam Schiff,
and I'll never give that orange turd a dime, she recalls,
calling him names, et cetera, et cetera. And then Trump's attorney,
you despise him, you know, Well she started it way,
Daniel says, she doesn't know, she doesn't own a home,
so on and so forth. Anyway, in twenty eleven, after
(11:06):
selling the story to in Touch magazine, Daniels was approached
by a man in a parking lot, and she then
implied that she told her close friends. She went into
a restroom in the class and didn't return to the
exercise class, and she felt that that was a message.
Speaker 2 (11:21):
Whatever. But you know something, this.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
Whole case is, and this is the saddest part about
yesterday is number one, it is a scary time in
this country. This is what we talk about with a
weaponized Department of Justice and politicized Department of Justice. It
can't be any more politicized. If you take the third
highest ranking DOJ official is Merrick Garland number one, there's
(11:48):
number two, and this guy's number three, and you put
him Biden's Justice Department on the case to prosecute his
political rival in a New York court room.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
What does that tell tell you?
Speaker 1 (12:00):
You pick a judge, you don't have the usual lottery
for the judge, and the judge happens to be a
Biden donor. How convenient you have all these stories about
a daughter and her ties to the Democratic Party, and
how they're raising money for the likes of Adam Shipp
and other prominent Democrats, and that they might stand to
benefit from the outcome of this trial. Nobody brings up
(12:22):
this is an eight plus year old case. Nobody brings
up that the New York statue new York City Statute
literally is a misdemeanor. It's a bookkeeping matter, and the
statute of limitations have long since passed. And then you
have this convoluted application of federal election law that no
(12:45):
attorney has been able to explain even what it is.
Never mind the gag order for Donald Trump, but no
gag order for any of the prosecution's top witnesses. No,
they're commenting all over cable TV, to the major newspapers,
that going on all over social media, and even asking
for quote gifts from people that watch the money.
Speaker 2 (13:05):
In other words, you know, Stormy.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
This was all used to humiliate embarrassed Donald Trump. All
of it was irrelevant, all of it was immaterial, None
of it had to do with the law. She's coached
by prosecutors. The judge never should have allowed this testimony.
And on top of all of it, a non disclosure
agreement is not illegal, it is a perfectly legal document.
(13:31):
On top of all of this, and nobody has even
gotten close to bringing Donald Trump into any involvement in
terms of the payment, that this is connected to the election,
or that he had anything to do with it. It's pretty unbelievable.
But the jury, the smoke and mirrors, and the salaciousness
(13:54):
of this trial. Let's put salatiousness on trial, because that's
what they're doing here. This is a This is a
disgusting time to watch. We don't have equal justice under
the law. We don't have equal application out of our
laws in this country anymore.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
We just don't.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
All right, the strangest, weirdest story of the day has
to be RFK who said he was experiencing memory loss
and mental fogginess so severe that a friend grew concerned
in twenty ten that he might have a brain tumor.
And this is not long after his uncle Ted died
of brain cancer. Anyway, doctors noticed a dark spot on
(14:33):
the younger Kennedy's brain scans they thought originally was a tumor.
And then he said in twenty twelve and a deposition,
that he scheduled a procedure at Duke University Medical Center
of the same surgeon who operated on his uncle, and
then he said, well, packing for his trip, he received
a call from a doctor at New York Presbyterian who
(14:54):
had a different opinion, and he believed he had a
dead parasite in his brain. The doctor believed the abnormality
seen in the scans was caused by a worm that
got into his brain and ate a portion of his
brain and then it died. He said in a deposition, Linda,
(15:15):
you're the health expert. You love to talk about health issues.
You want to comment on that one.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
I mean, I don't know what's so weird about having
a dead worm in your brain or a parasite. I mean,
what's weird about that?
Speaker 2 (15:27):
There's nothing weird in your mind about that.
Speaker 3 (15:29):
I mean, you know, I mean stranger things have happened, right,
I mean, you know, the brain looks.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
Like a bunch of worms, as is one hundred and
eighty ecdist God helped this country.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
You're all deputized help help sleepy.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
Joe just signed more executive actions in one week than
most presidents did in their entire term. So much for democracy.
Looks like Joe is the new dictator nities on right now.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
I'm twenty five to the top of the hour, eight
hundred and nine four one sean, if you want to
be a part of the program once again, our friends
at pure talk, well they've done it again. They invest
in their customers out of their own pocket. They give
you more service, and they don't charge you an extra penny.
And I'm happy to announce our friends of pure talk
are now providing international roaming to over fifty countries. And
(16:23):
as you make your summer travel plans, make sure that
you're going to be covered in terms of your signal
and your phone coverage at home and abroad. Now Pure Talk,
by the way, they use the same exact cell towers
as the big carriers, the same five G network as
the big carriers AT and T, Verizon, T Mobile. Right
now you can get for twenty bucks a month unlimited
(16:44):
talk and text plenty of five G data. Twenty bucks
a month. That's less than half the price of the
big carriers. Average families saving close to one thousand dollars
a year, many families even say more. And to make
the switch, you can join the stampede of US hundreds
of thousands. Just I'll pound two to fifty, say the
keyword save now, and they'll make it simple, fast and easy.
(17:07):
Pound two fifty, keyword save now for the exact same service.
You're saving a fortune. Do it now, you'll save an
additional fifty percent off your first month, and then you
can spend more money while you're on vacation. All right, So,
with all this said, as much of a disaster as
this case has been in New York against Donald Trump,
(17:28):
I still don't think Donald Trump has any shot at
a fair trial in New York City.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
I just don't. Now.
Speaker 1 (17:34):
Maybe my best hope would be a hung jury that
would take one and it gets very, very very difficult
to be a lone holdout in a jury room if
you're in the on the jury and you really see
that somebody is innocent and that maybe your fellow jurors
have a political agenda, maybe they hate Donald Trump. If
(17:56):
you know that's that's ninety percent of New York hates
Donald Trump. New York City is one of the most
liberal cities in the country now, nearly nine to one
registration Democrats the Republicans. And it's not just a Republican
friendly state, it's not a Trump friendly state. I don't
think you can get a fair trial. The fact that
this judge is as compromised as he is is pretty
(18:18):
unbelievable too. I mean, the judge is a Biden donor.
Why is he on this case? What about the daughter
and hard work with Democratic you know, politicians and raising
money potentially even off this case. That should have been
a reason for recusal. You know, it's an eight year
(18:38):
old case. The statute of limitations have run out, it's
a misdemeanor case. On top of everything else, they have
this convoluted application of federal election law that doesn't even apply.
And of course you have a gag order for one team,
the Trump team, and nobody else. Everybody else can say
whatever the hell they want, and all they do is
threaten to put the former president in jail. This is
(19:00):
a scary time in this country. And then we learned
Stormy Daniels was coached by the prosecutors in the lead
up to her testimony yesterday. Wow, I mean, think about that, really,
with the prosecution supposed to its supposed to prep you know,
their witnesses to say what they want them to say.
(19:22):
Pretty unbelievable, you know, but look at these cases. Look
just assume Trump's probably going to be found guilty here.
You have to assume it.
Speaker 2 (19:31):
Now.
Speaker 1 (19:31):
Do I think in the end it's going to have
an impact. I really don't. I think it'll be long
forgotten in one hundred and eighty days. I really believe that.
I don't think that the American people now, if they
try to put him in jail, I can't imagine the
backlash to that because people see this or ready for
what it is. This is a weaponized system of justice.
(19:54):
It's a travesty you're watching before in real time, the
shredding of our constantute and the rule of law and
the principles of equal justice under the law, and the
principle of equal application of our laws. I mean, it's
been one witch hunt after another, but all these cases
are just disintegrating before their eyes. You know, we've got
(20:16):
this pending Supreme Court decision on immunity. Now, I don't
think that the president should have even argued for, you know,
complete immunity, as they did. I think it's this certainly
limited immunity that would protect his actions as president. I
think that's a real issue, and if I had to guess,
(20:37):
I'd say the Supreme Court is going to rule in
his favor on that. Then you have another unrelated case
as it relates to January sixth, that would impact the
other charges against Donald Trump and DC. I think the
odds are that that DC case never happens. And then
you've got this disaster down in Florida and the documents
case here with a special prosecutor literally had to admit
(21:01):
and confess to the court that they tampered with with
evidence against Donald Trump. Our friend John Solomon broke this story.
It was a stunning ambition that Jack Smith's team, you know,
that admitted the key evidence in the President's classified documents
criminal case was altered or manipulated by his team since
(21:22):
they seized it the day they rated mar A Lago,
and the FBI and the prosecutors misled the court about
it for a period of time. I mean this, this
revelation alone, you know, should should negate this case. I'll
get to that in a second. Anyway, in this filing
that took place on Friday of last week, I was
out on Friday. But you know, Smith's team said that
(21:44):
the order of documents in some of the boxes of
memos was seized by the FBI was altered, jumbled, leaving
two different chronologies one that was digitally scanned another and
another the physical order in the boxes. Anyway, in the
filing to the judge in this case, Aileen Cannon, and
(22:04):
by the way, the left is so furious, they should
be furious with the way the evidence was mishandled and altered.
They shouldn't be angry at the judge to put a
hold on the case. The judge had to put a
hold on the case. You had no choice. In the footnote,
you have the Special Council conceding they misled the court
(22:26):
about the problem by previously declaring the evidence had remained
in the exact state that it had been seized. Quote
the Government acknowledges that this is inconsistent with what Government
Council previously understood and represented to the court.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
I thought, when you lie in court and you try
to cover it up, that's a big deal. Not with
a weaponized system of justice that will protect the special Council.
I still think Clarence Thomas should have been listened to
more closely because he was basically saying, you know, would
tell me constitutionally where Merrick Garland even had the right
(23:05):
or ability to appoint Jack Smith as Special counsel with
unlimited powers like this without any review in any way,
or any check or any balance.
Speaker 2 (23:15):
He made a good point.
Speaker 1 (23:16):
I think he was saying, hey, guys, you need to
look at this part of the law. It's amazing when
you listen to oral arguments how justices often will give
either side of that's making an argument. The real answer
to the question pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (23:33):
A lot of legal experts, you know, said, the court
essentially is, you know, in this court filing, they're admitting
that evidence had been tampered and the loss of a
specific document location is a destruction of exculpatory evidence. That
was a prominent defense attorney, attorney Tim Pallatour, in Solomon's column,
(23:56):
was quoted as say and that he worked on Trump's
team earlier in the classified documents K, but not anymore.
He said the admission is stunning on many levels, and
that the loss of specific document locations is a destruction
of exculpatory evidence. He said, I went through all the
boxes at the National Archives and Record Administration, and the
(24:18):
document order was important because it was clear to us
that the boxes had been untouched since leaving the White House.
For prosecutors who are trying to prove that the defendants
knowingly possessed these documents, to then destroy the evidence would
undermine their claim of a very serious allegation. Alan Dershowitz
added prosecutors and investigators should never tamper with or alter
(24:42):
evidence in their possession, including the order of documents in
a box, because one never knows what may become relevant
or crucial to a court or a jury later in
the case.
Speaker 2 (24:52):
He's right.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
Washington Times has now spoken out about this. They think
that this case needs to be dropped. I Judge Cannon,
I agree with them. Washington Times now calling on the
Florida Federal Judge Eileen Cannon to dismiss the Special Prosecutors
Classified documents case against Trump in the wake of this
confession that the investigators tampered with the evidence. Washington Times
(25:17):
writes Jack Smith had been reckless with the materials seized
in the rate of mister Trump's home at Mar A
Lago August eighth, twenty twenty two. The filter team took
care to ensure that no documents were moved from one
box to another, but it was not focused on maintaining
the sequence of documents within each box anyway. An outside
vendor was called in to scan the documents. Nobody seems
(25:39):
to have been watching what it was doing. Some boxes
where the order of items within the box is not
the same as in the associated scans, the government acknowledges
it is inconsistent with what the Government Council previously understood
and represented to the court. So the disclosures appeared to
suggest that the folder that are marked top secret were
(26:02):
put there by this team of the Special Council, and
they use classified cover sheets for that purpose. That case
is falling apart. Now we have the case in Georgia
is falling apart as well. For the second day in
a row. This it happened yesterday or Friday. But Donald
(26:23):
Trump now has scored a big legal winning against this
weaponized Department of Justice. And in this case, it happens
to deal with the issue of Georgia. Because a Georgia
appeals court moved one step closer to removing the district
attorney for Fulton County, Fannie Willis from her election interference case.
Speaker 2 (26:45):
That means that case will be dead.
Speaker 1 (26:48):
So the only case we're likely to get any any
verdict in if we even get a verdict. Look, I
think the best hope for Trump in New York, the
best hope is probably a hung jury. I don't think
you can get a fair trial there. I don't think
it could have got in a fair trial in DC
at all. That would have been a joke. I don't
think he could have gotten a fair trial in Fulton County, Georgia.
(27:09):
I think the only chance he'd have a shot would
be Florida. Then this disaster where we're learning that the
prosecution is coaching Stormy Daniels before her testimony yesterday.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
You got to be kidding me. You can't even make
this up.
Speaker 1 (27:22):
Later, I'll play for you even MSDNC and CNN legal
analysts are saying, this is a disaster for Alvin Bragg
and this New York case. Let me play fake news CNN.
The legal guy Eli honeg listen to what he said.
Speaker 5 (27:40):
But the cross example, boy, her responses were disastrous. I mean,
do you hate Donald Trump? Yes, of course she does.
That's a big deal. When the witness hates the person
who's liberty is a stake, that's a big damn feel.
And she's putting out tweets fantasizing about him being in jail.
That really underminds the credibility the fact that she owes
(28:01):
him five hundred thousand dollars, She by order of a
court owes Donald Trump half million dollars and said I
will never pay him. I will defy a court order.
The defense is going to say she's willing to defy
a court order. Why she's not willing to respect an
order of judge? Why is she going to respect this
oath she took? So I thought it went quite poorly
on cross exam. At the end of direct I thought, Okay,
they got what they needed. But I think the cross
(28:22):
is making really roy.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (28:26):
You know it's bad when Obama's wingman, Eric Holder, complained
the judge's decision to delay the trial in Florida was
not on the up and up. That means they know
this case is in deep, deep trouble. Their whole plan
of law fare and weaponizing the justice system not exactly working.
By the way, I got to give a credit to
(28:47):
a lot of Republicans out there because they're actually working
hard to do some good work. And when they do
good things, we got to give him a credit. But anyway,
Mike Johnson and Ship Roy did a press conference today
pushing the Save Act that would require proof of citizenship
to vote. I bet you know Democrats want to support that.
(29:08):
Speaker Mike Johnson is vowed to use Congress to block
Biden's lawfair campaign against Donald Trump. Anyways, he vowed today
to use all the powers of Congress at his disposal
to end all four current criminal prosecutions. He said, it
has to stop, and you're going to see the US
Congress address this in every possible way that we can
(29:29):
because we need accountability. All these cases need to be
dropped because they are a threat to our system. He's right,
there are a threat to our system. You know, it's
it's just an obscene case. The whole thing is obscene,
and this is what we're all living through. This is
what they've done to this country. Look at the borders,
(29:49):
Look at where America's position in the world, you know,
look at the economy. Is there anything that's going right
right now?
Speaker 3 (29:57):
I don't.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
I don't really see it.
Speaker 1 (29:59):
On top of that, when you think things couldn't get
any worse, the Boy Scouts of America make a big
change to be more inclusive. Yeah, after one hundred and
fourteen years, to boost inclusion, they have decided to rebrand
and instead of being the Boy Scouts, they're going to
be known as Scouting America. Okay, Basically, the Boy Scouts
(30:22):
are finished. After a one hundred and fourteen years, it's over.
Not I was never a boy Scout. I don't really care.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
Neither were.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
My My son was not a boy Scout. By the way,
neither of us were boy Scouts when we were young.
He was a far better boy Scout than I was, right, Linda,
that's for sure.
Speaker 3 (30:41):
I mean, By the way, it's very hard the whole
boy Scout thing because the name itself is for boys,
and I don't understand why we can't have something for
the boys. If anything, we need to encourage our young
men to learn some of these skill sets.
Speaker 2 (30:55):
Circle back.
Speaker 1 (30:56):
Jensaki says Republicans are supporting Trump because maybe he will die.
Speaker 6 (31:00):
I think there's two categories. I mean, there's obviously the
Tim Scott category. As you said, that's embarrassing to watch, cringe.
I've watched it many times. I think many of them
want to be close to power.
Speaker 2 (31:09):
They also assume or have this.
Speaker 6 (31:12):
Thought in their mind that maybe Donald Trump will go away,
maybe he'll go to jail, maybe he will die. Not
to be too morbid, but maybe, I mean, he's not
a young man who knows what's in their minds. They think,
maybe I will be behind the Oval Office, maybe I
will be in the old Office.
Speaker 1 (31:28):
The most repulsive thing that Biden is doing now is
he's withholding weapons from Israel and he is surrendered in
the war against terrorism. That is the most repulsive thing happening.
This is those radical Islamic terrorists that attack Israel on
October seventh. Trust me, they want to attack all of you.
(31:51):
All Right, we have a lot of ground to cover.
We'll get Bill O'Reilly's take on this. You know, sham
trial in New York. Actually, he called it revolting in
his newsletter that went out earlier this morning.
Speaker 2 (32:02):
We'll get to that. Also.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
Senator Tim Scott slammed by the view. His name is
mentioned quite a bit for VP. We'll talk to him
about that. Israel, these campus protesters, the economy, immigration, and
all much more in your calls coming up straight ahead.
And thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all of
you for being with us. Here is our toll free
telephone number you want to be a part of the
program today, it's eight hundred nine four one Sean if
you want to join us. All things simplemental righty today
we got Senator Tim Scott today. And I don't know
what they're gonna do with Joey Biden, your president.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Now.
Speaker 1 (00:21):
Remember he had a lot of trips and falls going
up the stairs, the big boy stairs of Air Force one,
and then of course he tripped three times in a
row on one trip up the stairs, and that didn't
go particularly well. And then his staff said, well, it's
very windy outside. I'm like, well, I don't know what's worse,
the fact that he tripped three times in a row,
or that they're blaming the wind and he's so weak
(00:43):
and frail that the wind can blow over.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
The president of the United States. But whatever.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
So they've tried to eliminate that problem, and they decided, okay,
rather than use the big boy stairs, we're going to
use the little boy baby stairs in the back of
Air Force one. It's not as steep, it's not as long,
it's it's certainly not as presidential and anyway. Joe Biden
(01:09):
nearly suffered another fall earlier today after navigating the baby
stairs the little Boy stairs onto Air Force one ahead
of his campaign trip to Wisconsin. Now, he did manage
to mount the stairs, but noticeably he was wobbling before
lurching for the nearest railing to stabilize himself. After turning
(01:30):
around to then wave and salute before entering the cabin
of the presidential aircraft. The video footage captured the whole
ordeal at Joint Bas Andrews in Maryland ahead of, you know,
Biden's trip to Wisconsin. I mean, this guy just does
He's not that it's not that he's old. I mean,
(01:52):
I know people that look Bernie Sanders. I can't stand them.
I really can't stand the guy. He's a Marxist social
idiot and an arrogant soob whatever however he's he's just
as cognitively strong today as he was years ago.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
And I think he's older than Biden. Has nothing to
do with age.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
I met many older people in my life that are
sharp as attack. Again, nothing to do with age. I
know many older people that stay in shape and they've
got you know, they've got some energy in their step
and you don't have to worry about them falling.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
And I do know other people.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
For example, I was out to dinner with friends of
mine and not that long ago, and and an older
couple that I happen to think the world of. And
I know that the in this case, the wife of
of a friend of mine. You know, she seemed a
little wobbly on her feet, so I just grab her
(02:52):
arm and I kind of not an aggressive way, just
hold on to it so that if God forbid, she
wobbles or or is beginning to trip or farm more,
I don't want it to fall. And one of the
worst things that can happen to older people, whether if
they lose their stamina and their strength, is a bad fall.
You break a hip and you're in the hospital and
(03:12):
you may never get out of the hospital by the
time all his said and done. You know, even John Stuart,
John Stuart just went big time hard against Biden and
his age during a set at this year's Netflix It's
called joke Fest, and he went really hard on anti
wokeness and anyway, he said, you know, it wasn't the
first time that he's addressed the issue of Biden's age
(03:34):
and having ranted about both Biden and President Trump, you know,
during his return to the Daily Show. And anyway, he says,
I know, liberals say, don't say Joe Biden is old.
Don't say well, people see with their own eyes. By
the way, any good comic, you know, any good humor
is rooted in truth. And he goes, you can say it,
(03:56):
he can, he can't hear us. I know, I know,
you know how freaking old he is. And I know
you don't want to say it because Trump is scary,
but he's so blanking old when you watch him on television.
You're nervous, aren't you. Then he said, I'm not saying
that Biden can't contribute to society. He just shouldn't be president.
(04:18):
And he's not wrong. And this guy does not like
Donald Trump at all, one bit at all whatsoever?
Speaker 2 (04:25):
Why are we allowing this?
Speaker 1 (04:27):
He goes on to say, And you know, sometimes comedians
can really, you know, just hone in on what is truthful.
You want to know why these late night comedy shows
fallon Kimmel Colbert don't do well. I want to know
why Greg Guttfeld does so well? Is Gutfeld. He'll show
(04:47):
videos of Biden, He'll tell the truth, he'll make jokes.
He'll make jokes about Republicans too. You go back to
the heyday of Johnny Carson and Jay Leno and Letterman.
Until the later years he got pretty political political and
kind of got pretty bitter. I don't know what happening,
got pretty bitter in his older age, but anyway, it's
(05:08):
I think it hurt his ratings. And then Jay Leno,
who you know, basically you know he was he was
after kicks and giggles and laughs, and he didn't care
who he's going after, and that made him, you know,
a much more you know, watchable host than the ratings.
You know, bore that out. Anyway, what are we gonna do?
President can't even get up the stairs now. They say, well,
(05:30):
we're gonna do shorter speeches because quality is much better
than quantity. They're not doing it because they want quality
over quantity. They they're doing it because in the middle
of every speech, blah blah, that's what people hear. He's
not capable. He doesn't have the strength, the stamina, and
(05:51):
the cognitive ability to give a long speech. He could
never do a Donald Trump like rally, he's not cognitively
capable of doing such a thing, you know. But don't
worry all the mob the media, by the way, even
the media, I'll play this later in the program today,
they see this was an unmitigated disaster. What happened yesterday
(06:14):
in that New York courtroom when Stormy Daniels took to
the stand. What was so interesting And you know, it's
hard to report on this to the full extent you
want to because it's happening during the show. But you know,
after I really had time to look at all of
the notes and everything that went on during cross examination
of Stormy Daniels, it was a disaster. I mean, her
(06:37):
demeanor shifted and changed dramatically and she became angry, you know.
And I think the biggest thing to come out of
all of this is she admitted to being coached by
the prosecution.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
And are you kidding me?
Speaker 1 (06:53):
So that's what the prosecution now does that you know,
she she goes through, you know, mock session with the prosecution. Anyway,
the President's attorney asked if she met with prosecutors in
rehearsed testimony. She said no to that, and then Trump's
attorney pressed and asked if she prepared in mock cross examinations,
(07:14):
and yeah, that would be rehearse testimony. She contradicted herself
right there, and she says, yeah, we've prepared mock cross examinations.
And Stormy says they practiced, well, what is rehearse? How
is rehearse in practicing any different? When asked if they
were brutal, Stormy says the memories were hard to bring up.
(07:34):
He says, the prosecutors wanted to have all the facts,
as much information as possible, and so now we have
the prosecution. Not only did they take somebody that we
now know is a political operative that's in the third
highest ranking position at Joe Biden's weaponized Department of Justice
and take him out of that prestigious position and put
(07:57):
him in Alvin Bragg's courtroom because nobody has any faith
in album Bragg's ability to you know, prosecute anything, and
so they bring in a ringer. Basically, Joe Biden's Department
of Justice is taken over by sending this guy over there.
She admits that she hates Donald Trump, really that she
wants Donald Trump in jail. She admits about the money decision.
(08:20):
And then here's the most interesting part to me, because
we have this letter, the letters dated January thirteenth, I'm sorry,
January thirtieth, twenty eighteen.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
It signed Stormy Daniels.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
When asked about it, she says, oh, yeah, she was
put under pressure to sign that document in January of
twenty eighteen. I'm going to read the document here in
a second. The only problem is is that in her
own statement, well, it doesn't justify what she is saying
in this statement and the things that she had said
(08:56):
in all the years that have passed. You know, she says,
over the past few weeks, I've been asked countless times
to comment about reports of an alleged sexual relationship I
had with Donald Trump many many, many years ago. The
fact of the matter is, this is twenty eighteen, not
that long ago. The fact of the matter is is
that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence
(09:17):
in two thousand and six, twenty eleven, twenty and sixteen,
twenty and seventeen, and now in twenty eighteen. I'm not
denying this affair because I was paid hush money, as
has been reported in overseas own tabloids, I'm denying this
affair because it never happened. I'll have no further comment
on the matter. Check out my Instagram site. Okay, now,
(09:41):
my question is, all right, you might have been under
pressure to sign it, but you did deny it in
two thousand and six. You didn't say anybody pressured you
to deny it then or twenty eleven. Donald Trump wasn't
running for president then, or twenty sixteen, wasn't running for
president then, or twenty seventeen. You know, well at that
point he a with twenty sixteen and seventeen, he was
(10:02):
you know, running for president obviously. But and now in
twenty eighteen, and then she admits, oh yeah, she wants
to make money on all of this, and of course
wrote a book about this, you know. And then of
course that she brings up the whole idea. She was
ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal
pece fees, but she had tweeted out, I'll go to
(10:23):
jail before I ever pay a penny, And then she
confirmed it's her tweet. She says it's her saying that
she's not gonna she will not pay for telling the truth.
My motivation was I was telling the truth. And then
Trump's attorney asked if Stormy cares about the court order,
she says, of course, I care. Asked if she's gonna pay,
she says, well, I don't know. But then they brought
(10:44):
up another tweet. I don't know him, you know, Adam Schiff,
and I'll never give that orange turd a dime, she recalls,
calling him names, et cetera, et cetera. And then Trump's attorney,
you despise him, you know, Well she started it way,
Daniel says, she doesn't know, she doesn't own a home,
so on and so forth. Anyway, in twenty eleven, after
(11:06):
selling the story to in Touch magazine, Daniels was approached
by a man in a parking lot, and she then
implied that she told her close friends. She went into
a restroom in the class and didn't return to the
exercise class, and she felt that that was a message.
Speaker 2 (11:21):
Whatever. But you know something, this.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
Whole case is, and this is the saddest part about
yesterday is number one, it is a scary time in
this country. This is what we talk about with a
weaponized Department of Justice and politicized Department of Justice. It
can't be any more politicized. If you take the third
highest ranking DOJ official is Merrick Garland number one, there's
(11:48):
number two, and this guy's number three, and you put
him Biden's Justice Department on the case to prosecute his
political rival in a New York court room.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
What does that tell tell you?
Speaker 1 (12:00):
You pick a judge, you don't have the usual lottery
for the judge, and the judge happens to be a
Biden donor. How convenient you have all these stories about
a daughter and her ties to the Democratic Party, and
how they're raising money for the likes of Adam Shipp
and other prominent Democrats, and that they might stand to
benefit from the outcome of this trial. Nobody brings up
(12:22):
this is an eight plus year old case. Nobody brings
up that the New York statue new York City Statute
literally is a misdemeanor. It's a bookkeeping matter, and the
statute of limitations have long since passed. And then you
have this convoluted application of federal election law that no
(12:45):
attorney has been able to explain even what it is.
Never mind the gag order for Donald Trump, but no
gag order for any of the prosecution's top witnesses. No,
they're commenting all over cable TV, to the major newspapers,
that going on all over social media, and even asking
for quote gifts from people that watch the money.
Speaker 2 (13:05):
In other words, you know, Stormy.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
This was all used to humiliate embarrassed Donald Trump. All
of it was irrelevant, all of it was immaterial, None
of it had to do with the law. She's coached
by prosecutors. The judge never should have allowed this testimony.
And on top of all of it, a non disclosure
agreement is not illegal, it is a perfectly legal document.
(13:31):
On top of all of this, and nobody has even
gotten close to bringing Donald Trump into any involvement in
terms of the payment, that this is connected to the election,
or that he had anything to do with it. It's pretty unbelievable.
But the jury, the smoke and mirrors, and the salaciousness
(13:54):
of this trial. Let's put salatiousness on trial, because that's
what they're doing here. This is a This is a
disgusting time to watch. We don't have equal justice under
the law. We don't have equal application out of our
laws in this country anymore.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
We just don't.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
All right, the strangest, weirdest story of the day has
to be RFK who said he was experiencing memory loss
and mental fogginess so severe that a friend grew concerned
in twenty ten that he might have a brain tumor.
And this is not long after his uncle Ted died
of brain cancer. Anyway, doctors noticed a dark spot on
(14:33):
the younger Kennedy's brain scans they thought originally was a tumor.
And then he said in twenty twelve and a deposition,
that he scheduled a procedure at Duke University Medical Center
of the same surgeon who operated on his uncle, and
then he said, well, packing for his trip, he received
a call from a doctor at New York Presbyterian who
(14:54):
had a different opinion, and he believed he had a
dead parasite in his brain. The doctor believed the abnormality
seen in the scans was caused by a worm that
got into his brain and ate a portion of his
brain and then it died. He said in a deposition, Linda,
(15:15):
you're the health expert. You love to talk about health issues.
You want to comment on that one.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
I mean, I don't know what's so weird about having
a dead worm in your brain or a parasite. I mean,
what's weird about that?
Speaker 2 (15:27):
There's nothing weird in your mind about that.
Speaker 3 (15:29):
I mean, you know, I mean stranger things have happened, right,
I mean, you know, the brain looks.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
Like a bunch of worms, as is one hundred and
eighty ecdist God helped this country.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
You're all deputized help help sleepy.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
Joe just signed more executive actions in one week than
most presidents did in their entire term. So much for democracy.
Looks like Joe is the new dictator nities on right now.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
I'm twenty five to the top of the hour, eight
hundred and nine four one sean, if you want to
be a part of the program once again, our friends
at pure talk, well they've done it again. They invest
in their customers out of their own pocket. They give
you more service, and they don't charge you an extra penny.
And I'm happy to announce our friends of pure talk
are now providing international roaming to over fifty countries. And
(16:23):
as you make your summer travel plans, make sure that
you're going to be covered in terms of your signal
and your phone coverage at home and abroad. Now Pure Talk,
by the way, they use the same exact cell towers
as the big carriers, the same five G network as
the big carriers AT and T, Verizon, T Mobile. Right
now you can get for twenty bucks a month unlimited
(16:44):
talk and text plenty of five G data. Twenty bucks
a month. That's less than half the price of the
big carriers. Average families saving close to one thousand dollars
a year, many families even say more. And to make
the switch, you can join the stampede of US hundreds
of thousands. Just I'll pound two to fifty, say the
keyword save now, and they'll make it simple, fast and easy.
(17:07):
Pound two fifty, keyword save now for the exact same service.
You're saving a fortune. Do it now, you'll save an
additional fifty percent off your first month, and then you
can spend more money while you're on vacation. All right, So,
with all this said, as much of a disaster as
this case has been in New York against Donald Trump,
(17:28):
I still don't think Donald Trump has any shot at
a fair trial in New York City.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
I just don't. Now.
Speaker 1 (17:34):
Maybe my best hope would be a hung jury that
would take one and it gets very, very very difficult
to be a lone holdout in a jury room if
you're in the on the jury and you really see
that somebody is innocent and that maybe your fellow jurors
have a political agenda, maybe they hate Donald Trump. If
(17:56):
you know that's that's ninety percent of New York hates
Donald Trump. New York City is one of the most
liberal cities in the country now, nearly nine to one
registration Democrats the Republicans. And it's not just a Republican
friendly state, it's not a Trump friendly state. I don't
think you can get a fair trial. The fact that
this judge is as compromised as he is is pretty
(18:18):
unbelievable too. I mean, the judge is a Biden donor.
Why is he on this case? What about the daughter
and hard work with Democratic you know, politicians and raising
money potentially even off this case. That should have been
a reason for recusal. You know, it's an eight year
(18:38):
old case. The statute of limitations have run out, it's
a misdemeanor case. On top of everything else, they have
this convoluted application of federal election law that doesn't even apply.
And of course you have a gag order for one team,
the Trump team, and nobody else. Everybody else can say
whatever the hell they want, and all they do is
threaten to put the former president in jail. This is
(19:00):
a scary time in this country. And then we learned
Stormy Daniels was coached by the prosecutors in the lead
up to her testimony yesterday. Wow, I mean, think about that, really,
with the prosecution supposed to its supposed to prep you know,
their witnesses to say what they want them to say.
(19:22):
Pretty unbelievable, you know, but look at these cases. Look
just assume Trump's probably going to be found guilty here.
You have to assume it.
Speaker 2 (19:31):
Now.
Speaker 1 (19:31):
Do I think in the end it's going to have
an impact. I really don't. I think it'll be long
forgotten in one hundred and eighty days. I really believe that.
I don't think that the American people now, if they
try to put him in jail, I can't imagine the
backlash to that because people see this or ready for
what it is. This is a weaponized system of justice.
(19:54):
It's a travesty you're watching before in real time, the
shredding of our constantute and the rule of law and
the principles of equal justice under the law, and the
principle of equal application of our laws. I mean, it's
been one witch hunt after another, but all these cases
are just disintegrating before their eyes. You know, we've got
(20:16):
this pending Supreme Court decision on immunity. Now, I don't
think that the president should have even argued for, you know,
complete immunity, as they did. I think it's this certainly
limited immunity that would protect his actions as president. I
think that's a real issue, and if I had to guess,
(20:37):
I'd say the Supreme Court is going to rule in
his favor on that. Then you have another unrelated case
as it relates to January sixth, that would impact the
other charges against Donald Trump and DC. I think the
odds are that that DC case never happens. And then
you've got this disaster down in Florida and the documents
case here with a special prosecutor literally had to admit
(21:01):
and confess to the court that they tampered with with
evidence against Donald Trump. Our friend John Solomon broke this story.
It was a stunning ambition that Jack Smith's team, you know,
that admitted the key evidence in the President's classified documents
criminal case was altered or manipulated by his team since
(21:22):
they seized it the day they rated mar A Lago,
and the FBI and the prosecutors misled the court about
it for a period of time. I mean this, this
revelation alone, you know, should should negate this case. I'll
get to that in a second. Anyway, in this filing
that took place on Friday of last week, I was
out on Friday. But you know, Smith's team said that
(21:44):
the order of documents in some of the boxes of
memos was seized by the FBI was altered, jumbled, leaving
two different chronologies one that was digitally scanned another and
another the physical order in the boxes. Anyway, in the
filing to the judge in this case, Aileen Cannon, and
(22:04):
by the way, the left is so furious, they should
be furious with the way the evidence was mishandled and altered.
They shouldn't be angry at the judge to put a
hold on the case. The judge had to put a
hold on the case. You had no choice. In the footnote,
you have the Special Council conceding they misled the court
(22:26):
about the problem by previously declaring the evidence had remained
in the exact state that it had been seized. Quote
the Government acknowledges that this is inconsistent with what Government
Council previously understood and represented to the court.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
I thought, when you lie in court and you try
to cover it up, that's a big deal. Not with
a weaponized system of justice that will protect the special Council.
I still think Clarence Thomas should have been listened to
more closely because he was basically saying, you know, would
tell me constitutionally where Merrick Garland even had the right
(23:05):
or ability to appoint Jack Smith as Special counsel with
unlimited powers like this without any review in any way,
or any check or any balance.
Speaker 2 (23:15):
He made a good point.
Speaker 1 (23:16):
I think he was saying, hey, guys, you need to
look at this part of the law. It's amazing when
you listen to oral arguments how justices often will give
either side of that's making an argument. The real answer
to the question pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (23:33):
A lot of legal experts, you know, said, the court
essentially is, you know, in this court filing, they're admitting
that evidence had been tampered and the loss of a
specific document location is a destruction of exculpatory evidence. That
was a prominent defense attorney, attorney Tim Pallatour, in Solomon's column,
(23:56):
was quoted as say and that he worked on Trump's
team earlier in the classified documents K, but not anymore.
He said the admission is stunning on many levels, and
that the loss of specific document locations is a destruction
of exculpatory evidence. He said, I went through all the
boxes at the National Archives and Record Administration, and the
(24:18):
document order was important because it was clear to us
that the boxes had been untouched since leaving the White House.
For prosecutors who are trying to prove that the defendants
knowingly possessed these documents, to then destroy the evidence would
undermine their claim of a very serious allegation. Alan Dershowitz
added prosecutors and investigators should never tamper with or alter
(24:42):
evidence in their possession, including the order of documents in
a box, because one never knows what may become relevant
or crucial to a court or a jury later in
the case.
Speaker 2 (24:52):
He's right.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
Washington Times has now spoken out about this. They think
that this case needs to be dropped. I Judge Cannon,
I agree with them. Washington Times now calling on the
Florida Federal Judge Eileen Cannon to dismiss the Special Prosecutors
Classified documents case against Trump in the wake of this
confession that the investigators tampered with the evidence. Washington Times
(25:17):
writes Jack Smith had been reckless with the materials seized
in the rate of mister Trump's home at Mar A
Lago August eighth, twenty twenty two. The filter team took
care to ensure that no documents were moved from one
box to another, but it was not focused on maintaining
the sequence of documents within each box anyway. An outside
vendor was called in to scan the documents. Nobody seems
(25:39):
to have been watching what it was doing. Some boxes
where the order of items within the box is not
the same as in the associated scans, the government acknowledges
it is inconsistent with what the Government Council previously understood
and represented to the court. So the disclosures appeared to
suggest that the folder that are marked top secret were
(26:02):
put there by this team of the Special Council, and
they use classified cover sheets for that purpose. That case
is falling apart. Now we have the case in Georgia
is falling apart as well. For the second day in
a row. This it happened yesterday or Friday. But Donald
(26:23):
Trump now has scored a big legal winning against this
weaponized Department of Justice. And in this case, it happens
to deal with the issue of Georgia. Because a Georgia
appeals court moved one step closer to removing the district
attorney for Fulton County, Fannie Willis from her election interference case.
Speaker 2 (26:45):
That means that case will be dead.
Speaker 1 (26:48):
So the only case we're likely to get any any
verdict in if we even get a verdict. Look, I
think the best hope for Trump in New York, the
best hope is probably a hung jury. I don't think
you can get a fair trial there. I don't think
it could have got in a fair trial in DC
at all. That would have been a joke. I don't
think he could have gotten a fair trial in Fulton County, Georgia.
(27:09):
I think the only chance he'd have a shot would
be Florida. Then this disaster where we're learning that the
prosecution is coaching Stormy Daniels before her testimony yesterday.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
You got to be kidding me. You can't even make
this up.
Speaker 1 (27:22):
Later, I'll play for you even MSDNC and CNN legal
analysts are saying, this is a disaster for Alvin Bragg
and this New York case. Let me play fake news CNN.
The legal guy Eli honeg listen to what he said.
Speaker 5 (27:40):
But the cross example, boy, her responses were disastrous. I mean,
do you hate Donald Trump? Yes, of course she does.
That's a big deal. When the witness hates the person
who's liberty is a stake, that's a big damn feel.
And she's putting out tweets fantasizing about him being in jail.
That really underminds the credibility the fact that she owes
(28:01):
him five hundred thousand dollars, She by order of a
court owes Donald Trump half million dollars and said I
will never pay him. I will defy a court order.
The defense is going to say she's willing to defy
a court order. Why she's not willing to respect an
order of judge? Why is she going to respect this
oath she took? So I thought it went quite poorly
on cross exam. At the end of direct I thought, Okay,
they got what they needed. But I think the cross
(28:22):
is making really roy.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (28:26):
You know it's bad when Obama's wingman, Eric Holder, complained
the judge's decision to delay the trial in Florida was
not on the up and up. That means they know
this case is in deep, deep trouble. Their whole plan
of law fare and weaponizing the justice system not exactly working.
By the way, I got to give a credit to
(28:47):
a lot of Republicans out there because they're actually working
hard to do some good work. And when they do
good things, we got to give him a credit. But anyway,
Mike Johnson and Ship Roy did a press conference today
pushing the Save Act that would require proof of citizenship
to vote. I bet you know Democrats want to support that.
(29:08):
Speaker Mike Johnson is vowed to use Congress to block
Biden's lawfair campaign against Donald Trump. Anyways, he vowed today
to use all the powers of Congress at his disposal
to end all four current criminal prosecutions. He said, it
has to stop, and you're going to see the US
Congress address this in every possible way that we can
(29:29):
because we need accountability. All these cases need to be
dropped because they are a threat to our system. He's right,
there are a threat to our system. You know, it's
it's just an obscene case. The whole thing is obscene,
and this is what we're all living through. This is
what they've done to this country. Look at the borders,
(29:49):
Look at where America's position in the world, you know,
look at the economy. Is there anything that's going right
right now?
Speaker 3 (29:57):
I don't.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
I don't really see it.
Speaker 1 (29:59):
On top of that, when you think things couldn't get
any worse, the Boy Scouts of America make a big
change to be more inclusive. Yeah, after one hundred and
fourteen years, to boost inclusion, they have decided to rebrand
and instead of being the Boy Scouts, they're going to
be known as Scouting America. Okay, Basically, the Boy Scouts
(30:22):
are finished. After a one hundred and fourteen years, it's over.
Not I was never a boy Scout. I don't really care.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
Neither were.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
My My son was not a boy Scout. By the way,
neither of us were boy Scouts when we were young.
He was a far better boy Scout than I was, right, Linda,
that's for sure.
Speaker 3 (30:41):
I mean, By the way, it's very hard the whole
boy Scout thing because the name itself is for boys,
and I don't understand why we can't have something for
the boys. If anything, we need to encourage our young
men to learn some of these skill sets.
Speaker 2 (30:55):
Circle back.
Speaker 1 (30:56):
Jensaki says Republicans are supporting Trump because maybe he will die.
Speaker 6 (31:00):
I think there's two categories. I mean, there's obviously the
Tim Scott category. As you said, that's embarrassing to watch, cringe.
I've watched it many times. I think many of them
want to be close to power.
Speaker 2 (31:09):
They also assume or have this.
Speaker 6 (31:12):
Thought in their mind that maybe Donald Trump will go away,
maybe he'll go to jail, maybe he will die. Not
to be too morbid, but maybe, I mean, he's not
a young man who knows what's in their minds. They think,
maybe I will be behind the Oval Office, maybe I
will be in the old Office.
Speaker 1 (31:28):
The most repulsive thing that Biden is doing now is
he's withholding weapons from Israel and he is surrendered in
the war against terrorism. That is the most repulsive thing happening.
This is those radical Islamic terrorists that attack Israel on
October seventh. Trust me, they want to attack all of you.
(31:51):
All Right, we have a lot of ground to cover.
We'll get Bill O'Reilly's take on this. You know, sham
trial in New York. Actually, he called it revolting in
his newsletter that went out earlier this morning.
Speaker 2 (32:02):
We'll get to that. Also.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
Senator Tim Scott slammed by the view. His name is
mentioned quite a bit for VP. We'll talk to him
about that. Israel, these campus protesters, the economy, immigration, and
all much more in your calls coming up straight ahead.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
The Nikki Glaser Podcast
Every week comedian and infamous roaster Nikki Glaser provides a fun, fast-paced, and brutally honest look into current pop-culture and her own personal life.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.