May 9, 2024 • 31 mins
Bill O’Reilly, author of the upcoming book, Confronting the Presidents, No Spin Assessments from Washington to Biden, discusses the ongoing NY “hush money” trial, which is showing all the fluff and none of the evidence that the left promised. From Hicks, to McConney to Cohen, one thing is for sure, President Trump is innocent. The court is in recess today and will resume with the testimony of prostitute Stormy Daniels.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
All right, Leonard Skinner, simple man.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
That can only mean one thing on this radio program,
and that is all things self proclaimed simple man. That
means all things Bill O'Reilly, all things O'Reilly at billoreilly
dot com. We have been talking a lot about the
unmitigated disaster which was the cross examination of Stormy Daniels
yesterday and the just the tawdry, salacious, immaterial relevant testimony
(01:01):
that she gave all day yesterday. I guess she's back
on the stand tomorrow. And how this to me is
a very scary time in our country. This is what
we have been discussing at length about the weaponization of
our justice system and how it's been politicized. And you're
dealing with an eight year old case. You're dealing with
a case where the judge is a Biden donor, where
(01:24):
a family member could very well stand to benefit career
wise and financially from the case, a misdemeanor whose statute
of limitations have passed, and of course some convoluted application
of federal election law under which they have no jurisdiction.
On top of that, a gag order that allows anybody
(01:46):
that is going to testify for the prosecution. They can
go out and they can ask for gifts on social
media as they analyze the case on cable TV and
interview after interview on social media. I mean, are just
repulsive times the idea. I think the worst thing that
came out yesterday is not the fact that Stormy Daniels
(02:07):
admits she hates Donald Trump, that she wants Donald Trump
in jail. I think the worst part is she admits
to being coached by the prosecution. And is that how
our legal system now works, That people that are going
to be witnesses for the prosecution get coached on what
they should say and how they should act and what
(02:29):
they should do. Does that sound like equal justice under
the law and equal application of our laws in this country. Well,
Bill O'Reilly's simple man actually put out on Bill O'Reilly
dot com. He use the word revolting to describe what
happened yesterday. And I noticed that, and I can't think
of a better adjective.
Speaker 1 (02:49):
Sir, how are you you know?
Speaker 3 (02:51):
I'm a wordsmith, but oh.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
My gosh, do you have to start? You're starting in already?
Go ahead?
Speaker 3 (02:57):
All of this helps trump, It all helps. Let me
just walk you through it. So the first essential question
and I don't think the Trump lawyer is doing a
good job. By the way, So the first essential question
I would have asked Stormy Daniels is why do you
want money for this alleged meeting? Why do you want
(03:25):
money for it? Okay, isn't that the first question she
wants more?
Speaker 2 (03:31):
That's that's one of the first questions. I'm hearing you out.
I'm giving you space, mister tall.
Speaker 3 (03:37):
Yeah, that's where it all goes to. So she's sworn in,
I'm the lawyer. I go up and I go, well,
you know, just before the president's presidential election twenty sixteen,
you were demanding money for a social occasion. I would
use that word social occasion. Okay, why.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
You know what the worst part of this bill is
all of the salacious details that this this judge, this
Biden donor judge allowed yesterday. None of it was material
to the case. None of it is relevant to.
Speaker 3 (04:13):
The law because of the appeal is a lock.
Speaker 1 (04:17):
The appeal is a lock. Here's the problem with the
appeal bill.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
The appeal is going to happen after the election, I know,
and for the and from if he gets convicted, which
I think he will because it's new York. I believe
that every other word is going to be, you know,
convict Donald Trump. Could you know, ex con Donald Trump?
Convict Donald Trump, convict Donald Trump. That's all you're gonna hear.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
I don't think so. Now I think he's going to
get acquitted because I'm putting the jury.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
You really wait, you think he's going to get acquitted
with a New York jury? You really believe that, at
best he might get a hung jury.
Speaker 1 (04:53):
At best?
Speaker 3 (04:54):
Okay, so that means he's acquitted.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
Not really.
Speaker 3 (04:59):
They could reach, but they don't have to and they
probably won't. So anyway, just stay with me, Hannity. I'm
in the jury, Okay, I hate Trump, and I'm in
the jury, and I'm listening to this woman rail on
and on and on about things that have nothing to
do with the alleged crime of election fraud. That's what
(05:26):
it is. That's what comes down to. That's what Bragg is.
Speaker 1 (05:28):
Well, we'll hang on one second.
Speaker 2 (05:30):
They claim that, but we don't even really know what
federal statute or by what standard. But you're used to
take a misdemeanor to a fellon if we don't even know.
Speaker 3 (05:41):
That yet, you're doing two different tracks now, you're analyzing
from the macro point of view. I'm on the jury
I'm in the jury box. That's where I want to
go here. So I'm in the jury box and I
hate Trump, but I'm a fair human being and I'm
listening to this testimony from this woman who's obviously unhinged
(06:03):
and has a motivation to get money. That's what she
wants money. And everybody knows that there's no two sides
through the story. So that's what the Trump lawyer should
be saying. Hey, this isn't about election fraud. It's not
about anything other than a political prosecution by people who
(06:24):
hate Donald Trump, and this woman is part of it.
And in addition to hating him, she wants money from him. Now,
let me introduce another name. And I don't know and
I'm going to ask you if you know the name.
And I didn't know the name, So I'm going to
mit that up top. Until I started my investigation of
this last week, Dino said, Judin, you know what you know?
(06:47):
Who is I do not. In November twenty fifteen, Dino
said Jujen, a former doorman at the Trump Tower, tried
to sell a story to the National Inquiry that Donald
Trump buthered a child out of wedlock while Mary.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
Oh the doorman dead doorman.
Speaker 3 (07:04):
Dino said, Judan, he did exactly the same thing that
Stormy Daniels and the other one did. Okay, tried to
get money by saying salacious things about Donald Trump. The
National Inquirer gave him thirty thousand dollars, and I assume
they were reimbarrassed by my uncle Cohen. Okay, I assume it.
I don't know for sure, but I believe that's the case.
(07:27):
The story turned out to be completely bogus, completely untrue,
because the woman that he named to the National Inquirer,
they checked her out and she said, I'm in pregnant.
But he got to keep the thirty k Dino. Okay,
Why isn't Dino on a stand? Why didn't Bragg bring
(07:48):
Dino into the courtroom. Why isn't the jury hearing Dino?
Dino got three thousand.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
By the way, if Trump's attorneys were smart, they could
called Dino into the courtroom.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
Could and it.
Speaker 4 (08:00):
Blows up the whole thing, because anybody a week out
from the presidential election, anybody having Dino and Stormy and
the other one demanding money, you shut them up. Because
they would affect the election, because the press isn't gonna
(08:24):
check out Dino. They're just gonna print the accusation. And
it's a week before the vote, so of course you're
gonna do that.
Speaker 3 (08:33):
Anybody would do it and approve my point.
Speaker 4 (08:36):
The message of the day on Bill O'Reilly is about
Grover Cleveland and the exact same thing happened to him
in New York State in eighteen seventy six.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
Exactly ended up getting elected president.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
He won, but very narrowly. And the one showed up
and the woman said, which was true.
Speaker 4 (09:01):
That Cleveland fathered here child out of wedlock, blah blah blah,
blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
But with the jury, with the human beings who make
this decision, ultimately have to know is that this is
a total fraud, politically generated thing, and that's how you
get an acquittal, That's how you get a hung jury.
Final point I want to make I use the word
revolting because that's what it is. And it is so
(09:29):
shameful that the State of New York would participate in this.
You don't think that people around a country are looking
at the State of New York going that's a sewer sewer,
that's what that place is, even people who hate Trump.
And by extension, Trump will get out of this one,
(09:50):
and George's falling apart, and the Malague document thing isn't
going to happen.
Speaker 2 (09:56):
And Washington's falling apart also, and the President will be
granted limited immunity by the Supreme Court number one, and
that second case that is not related to him will
impact his case.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
So right from today, Trump has got all the legal
stuff behind him. He emerges a winner on this whole thing.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
And that I am not convinced you're right in your
conclusion that we that he will have an acquittal. His
best shot might be a hung jury might be Okay,
let me let me bring this up for you because
and this gets to the entire crux of the legal aspect. Really,
what we're talking about here, Bill, is a bookkeeping error.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
That's all this is.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
That would be a misdemeanor in New York based on
the Statute of New York State and New York City. Uh,
the statute of limitations have long since past. If somebody
gets involved in an NDA, a non disclosure agreement, which
by the way, probably the prosecutor's office has hundreds of them.
If I had to venture a guess, I would just
(11:02):
most corporations have them. It's a it's a way of
coming to a settlement. And both sides then agreed that
they won't talk about the settlement post settlement. All right,
it is not illegal to engage in an ndaight or
to have an NDA We're talking about a bookkeeping mistake.
My question to Stormy Daniels would be, Miss Daniels, I
(11:25):
have a question for you. You said you were you
were pressured, you felt pressure, you felt you felt threatened
to sign that January thirtieth, twenty eighteen statement, and in
that statement you said that the fact of the matter
is is that each party to this alleged affair has
denied its existence in two thousand and six, twenty eleven,
(11:48):
twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, and now again in twenty eighteen.
I'm not denying this affair because I was paid quote
unquote hush money, as has been reported in overseas own tabloid.
I'm denying this affair because it never happened. That's what
she says, Miss Daniels. Were you feeling pressure in two
(12:09):
thousand and six when you made that public statement. Were
you feeling pressure? Were you under pressure in twenty eleven
or twenty sixteen or twenty seventeen. And when you finally
did tell your story in a book, you were being
paid to write that book.
Speaker 1 (12:25):
Is that correct?
Speaker 2 (12:26):
And when you sold your story in Touch magazine or
whatever the tabloid was, you were being paid for that.
Is that not correct? So I think all of her
testimony is completely impeached. But the fact that the Biden
donor judge allowed this to unfold in this courtroom is
a national disgrace. The fact that this case was even
(12:47):
brought is a national disgrace. The fact that the third
highest ranking Justice Department official in the Biden Justice Department
left that prestigious position to run points on this prosecution
or persecution of Donald Trump is nothing but a total
(13:07):
a travesty. If you believe in the rule of law,
if you believe in equal justice under the law, and
if you believe an equal application of our laws, you
get the last words.
Speaker 3 (13:18):
Yeah, I mean, look, that's why I said at the
beginning of our conversation today that Trump really emerges the
winner on all this, even if you don't like him.
Nobody in their right mind would think that Stormy Daniels
is a credible witness. She owes Donald Trump five hundred
and sixty thousand dollars. Do you think the jury members
know that they haven't been told that yet.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
No, that actually came up in trial yesterday, and she
actually testified that she has no intention wells he had
said publicly already that she had no intention of ever
paying it right, and then was asked if she's going
to pay it back and she said, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
So anyway, no one believes this is up and up.
It comes down on a partisanship again. People hate Trump,
They'll vote for Biden. Fair minded people I think will
vote for Trump. And there why do you have.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
So much confidence in this jury? I'm having a hard
time understanding that part.
Speaker 3 (14:12):
Believe that you get twelve individuals who are rotten corrupt people.
I think out of the twelve, you'll have maybe six
who are rotten and corrupt, and the other six probably aren't.
And I'm going just by human nature now.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
So, but there's been so much smoke and mirrors. They
talk about a conspiracy, they talk about election and afearans,
they talk about everything except what he's been charged with.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
Listen. Even people on the Golden Bachelor can understand this.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
By the way, oh Riley, you may be on the
Golden Bachelor. I nominate you to go on the Golden Bachelor.
Speaker 3 (14:47):
That's cruel because I don't want to myself on anybody else.
You're just being.
Speaker 1 (14:52):
No, no, no, no, you're not.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
I bet you A lot of people would be interested
in courting you and maybe thinking about or contem plating
marrying you.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
It would be great.
Speaker 3 (15:01):
Not after ten minutes of talking to me, they'd be
out the door.
Speaker 1 (15:05):
That's probably true.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
All right, Bill O'Reilly dot com All things simple man,
quick break right back, will continue.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
Marking every day to remember the forgotten Man.
Speaker 5 (15:18):
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
Al right, twenty five to the top of the hour,
eight hundred and nine four one, Sean. If you want
to be a part of the program, you may not
know this. A violent crime is committed in America, our country,
every twenty four seconds. Now when it hits your doorstep,
one wrong decision that could mean losing your home, your freedom,
or even worse. And that's you know, just because owning
(15:42):
a gun just isn't enough anymore. Listen, you need a
new way to protect yourself and your family. Let me
tell you about Rod Chadwick. I met him. He's the
former head of training for the FBI at Quantico. He
doesn't teach gun tricks or gimmicks. That's no, that's not
all he does here. He's great with a firearm. He
knows how to spot danger before it's too late, and
(16:05):
how to stop an attacker with words, and how to
make a life or death decision under pressure. Now, Robin
the US Concealed Carry Association, they have created a free video.
You need to watch it to get ready for all
that is coming with no bail and defund and dismantle
and reimagining the police and what's been happening and what's
(16:27):
going to get worse now. This video is not for everyone.
It is one of the most important law officers giving
tips that few civilians ever get to hear. And it's
available to Hannity listeners for a very limited time. I
want you to go to this website right now, watch
it for free. It's Defendfamily dot Com. Watch it right now.
(16:48):
Defendfamily dot Com. That's d F E N D family
one word dot com.
Speaker 3 (16:54):
All right.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
Even the mob and the media are pretty much seeing
what this does of Stormy Daniels was yesterday and what
a disaster this trial has become. And you can tell
they're getting very antsy, although they were very cocky in
the beginning of this trial, thinking this is a slam dunk.
Harry Littman is an MSDNC legal analyst and listened to
(17:18):
him describe Stormy Daniels as a colorful guest who irritated
the judge. You don't think the jury noticedes that.
Speaker 6 (17:25):
Listen, We're talking about a very very colorful witness who
detailed kinds of events and just while you know, efforts
and ways of being that I think for the jury
were fairly foreign. She spoke very quickly, nervously. She told
a lot of jokes and not all of them landed.
(17:45):
I haven't seen Mayr Chan this in this trial be
so sort of irritated, and it came across, I think
as being irritated with her level of detail. That's something
if you're the DA you're worried about because you don't
want them to think that he the judge is actually
displeased in any way with the witness.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
And you have another MSDNZ legal expert saying that Stormy
Daniels turned the trial into a quasi sexual assault case,
and most of her testimony was probably unnecessary. Most of it,
pretty much all of it. It was all irrelevant, It
was all immaterial.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
Listen.
Speaker 7 (18:24):
I think Stormy daniels testimony could have been accomplished with
three words in the sense that we had sex. Everything
else was probably unnecessary. It goes back to the issue.
This is not a sex assault case, and the defense
is going to argue and right or wrong, this is
what they will argue on appeal that that kind of
testimony turned this into a quasi sex assault case, which
(18:47):
painted the defendant in an unnecessarily bad light in a
way that you can't unring the bell. Stormy Daniels is
one of those witnesses that tends to not just answer
the question asked, but add her own editorial. And that
is a really dangerous thing.
Speaker 1 (19:02):
I promise you.
Speaker 7 (19:02):
The prosecution is sitting at their desk saying, just answer
the question. Please, just answer the question, Please, just the question,
no editorialize.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
All right, let's get to our busy phones. But even
they're beginning to get it. Eight hundred and ninety four one,
Shawn is a number. If you want to be a
part of the program. Gina is in the state of California,
the socialist Marxist utopia.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
What's going on?
Speaker 5 (19:24):
How are you, oh, Sean, I'm so happy that I'm
on I need your help. I reached my breaking point.
I've lived in southern California all my life. My line
in the sand was going to be the sanctuary state
where we let the convicted felons out the back door
and we don't tell the Fed so they can go
back in the street. However, now with I'm paying medical
(19:48):
one hundred percent pay, no copays, no out of pocket expenses, all.
Speaker 2 (19:53):
These Well, if you're any illegal immigrant, you get free
healthcare in California.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
You know that, right, That's right.
Speaker 5 (20:00):
So now I'm paying one hundred percent free health care.
They don't pay a premium, they don't pay a co pay,
and it's one hundred percent paid by me. They got
free driver's license a couple of years ago. Now one
hundred percent paid state tuition. And I just get a
letter from my kids' school saying that if English is
(20:20):
your second language, you have priority to get on the
list for after school care. So now they are above
me as far as my kids getting on the list
for after school care. My parents came from New York
sixty four years ago to California, paying taxes. Their children
and grandchildren now have less right than someone who just
(20:40):
hopped over the border. So here's the help I need
from you. I've had it. Tomorrow, me and my three boys,
I got triplets, we're jumping on a plane to Florida
and we are meeting with a real estate agent at
one hundred and fourteen new home bills in the Tampa area.
And I need your advice because I don't know if
I could and the humidity, but I have had What
(21:04):
should I do? Tell me?
Speaker 1 (21:06):
Well, first of all, the weather's very similar.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
I did live in Santa Barbara for five years in
southern California, and the weather's very similar to their Where
in California?
Speaker 5 (21:15):
Do you live Ocean side area? So it's a pretty
nice area.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Yeah, No, it's a very nice area where you are.
And look, this is what you've got to do. Got
to You've got to find the place that's right for you.
Speaker 1 (21:27):
Tampa.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
I happen to love I have a lot of friends there.
I know what will become your favorite restaurant. It's going
to be Chicken Salad Chick because my friends Paul and
Lindsay run the place and they have a number of
stores around the Tampa area and it's phenomenal, uh, and
the people are wonderful. The biggest change for me has
been a very very discernible way that people react to me.
(21:53):
All Right, I'm a public figure, I'm fair game. I
understand that people in New York City are not gonna
like me. But it was was getting pretty downright hostile
for me at the end, and I felt it was
becoming a danger not only for me, but anybody that
might be with me at any given time.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
And I just didn't like it.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
And and I had to be very selective where I went,
and I just I didn't feel free, and I never
liked the weather. And on top of it, I just saw,
you know, crime and disintegrating government in front of my eyes.
You know, was taxes a consideration? Absolutely. Here's my advice.
Take your trip and take a look at areas that
(22:32):
you think you might be interested in, and then you
have to look into the all the legal steps that
are necessary to domicile become a resident and a full
time Floridian. And by the way, the things that I
had to do. The list was long, and I hired
lawyers and accountants to do it all the right way,
(22:54):
the legal way, and I just followed it by the book.
I just you know, I hired the right people that
know their job, and there are people that just help
other people from other states make the transition to Florida
and do it in a clean way and do it
in a legal way. And I did it that way.
But I will tell you it's the best move I
ever made. I don't regret it, and haven't regretted it
(23:15):
one second, and I couldn't be happier now. Well, I
occasionally go back to New York and say hello to
some of my friends. Yeah, maybe a couple of weekends
a year, And to be honest, though, they all want
to come down here and see me because the weather's petter,
especially in the winter time. But I don't think you'll
regret it. I really I have found the people so
(23:37):
welcoming to me, and everybody that I know down here
just they're very nice people, and they're from all over
the country. The west coast of Florida tends to be
more Midwestern people from Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. You know,
salt of the Earth people on the east coast of Florida,
you tend to have more people from the northeast. But
(24:00):
with that said, you have people coming from all over
the country. I think you're going to see this migration continue,
probably for fifty more years. You still have baby boomers
that have yet to retire, and I think for a
lot of different reasons, people are going to be moving
down here more and more. Miami seems to be growing
into Wall Street South, and I think you're going to
(24:20):
see more financial institutions abandoning New York as the years
go on and people realize that it's a better way
to live. The schools you mentioned schools. Schools are number
one in terms of student learning of every state in
Florida for about half the cost that they're paying in California.
(24:42):
If you look at the crime rate, violent crime rate,
it's half of what it is in California. You have
a governor that literally has a higher population than the
state of New York, and their budget is half of
what New York's is, and their infrastructures a thousand times better.
So I think that this is a much better place
(25:02):
to raise your family and you're going to find like
minded people. The only thing I say to other people
listening to us that might be considering moving here, if
you're going to bring your liberal, leftist Marxist values with you,
stay where you are.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
Absolutely and Desanta signed in the voucher system. My kids
can go to a private school and get eight thousand
dollars because the indoctrination right now at the schools in
San Diego, you wouldn't even believe it. Sean you.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
Yeah, but you know what, you might be able to
use the public schools because they're not you know, they're
being really diligent in Florida in terms of age appropriate
materials and focusing on reading, writing, maths, science, history, and computers.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
They're not focused on woke.
Speaker 5 (25:44):
And it's because one of their thing classrooms is just
decorated with LGBT flats. I don't know why. I don't
know why someone's sexuality is in my kids classroom, but
that's what it is, all over the classroom. Signed, and
I don't even know how they get away with it.
But I'm hoping that they're not going to see that,
that they're just actually going to learn.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
I will tell you that I think look this is
air condition everywhere. I mean, you know, even when I
lived in New York, to be honest, you know, winter
weather wasn't that bad for me, because I'd get out
of a car, I'd go to a building and i'd
be in a room, or and then i'd get back
in a car, go to another building, and then I'd
be in a room, and if the heat wasn't high enough,
I'd put it up. So I didn't have to experience
(26:29):
that much of the winter burden, if you will. My
days of shoveling were over, so I didn't have to
worry about that too much. And I just I'll tell you,
I just think the people down here very special. I think,
you know, the entire southern part of the United States
are people that probably share your values and are committed
to the things you're committed to, and they believe in
(26:51):
the values that you believe in. And let New York,
in California and Illinois and New Jersey, you know, go
their own way and they'll have their value values, and
I guess the people will put up with their high taxes, burdens,
some regulation, horrible weather and everything in between.
Speaker 5 (27:08):
Yeah. Absolutely, And DeSantis has you know, he's done a
great job.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
He's been a great governor honestly, and he's become a
great friend. Yeah, and I was glad to see that
him and President Trump got together and hopefully put their
differences aside. I think there's way more they agree on
than disagree on. Campaigns get you know, pretty pretty brutal sometimes,
and that happened, but I'm glad they put it past them.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
Anyway.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
I appreciate it. We will welcome you with open arms
that I can tell you. Don't let not your heart
beat trouble there.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
Okay.
Speaker 5 (27:42):
I don't know where you're living because you're not disclosing it.
But I don't know. I hope maybe I see on
my trip.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
Well maybe this year I might go out on a
little Hannity tour at some point.
Speaker 1 (27:52):
I don't know. I haven't decided yet. We're working on
a couple of things.
Speaker 5 (27:54):
Okay, thanks so much, Sean.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn. If you want to
be a part of the program, all right, quick freak.
We'll come right back, and more of your calls coming
up straight ahead, toll free. It is eight hundred and
nine to four one, Shawn. If you want to be
a part of the program as we continue broadcasting throughout
the greatest country in the world.
Speaker 3 (28:20):
You are locked in on.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
The Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Show showho, Let's get back to our busy phones. Kevin
San Francisco, Next Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 8 (28:33):
Hi, Hey Sean, how you doing.
Speaker 1 (28:36):
What's going on? Doing good?
Speaker 4 (28:38):
Well?
Speaker 8 (28:38):
Thanks for all you what you do. I pray to
God that Donald Trump, our President Trump, gets acquitted and
comes back in fights the even the Republican Party, because
there's a lot of whimps in the Republican Party that
will not stand up for President Trump yet alone for
(29:02):
the American people. They let the Democrats change the narrative.
And that's what I love about President Trump is he
will change it and flip it on a dime and
actually have the media spun out on stuff like he
can go in there and say, hey, you could be
a pro choice, you can be for abortion, and I
(29:24):
would love for him to say, like, you know what,
you can fall back on that, but I will put
the same amount of money into people that want to
fight for life and have that, you know as an option.
I'm pro life. I believe in God, I believe you know,
that's that's what we're here for. But if he went
(29:48):
in there and changed the narrative and had people think
about it and be like, you know what, I have
a choice, we will overwhelmingly win.
Speaker 2 (29:56):
Let me say this, all of the things that you're
saying can happen hundred and eighty days.
Speaker 1 (30:01):
Okay. I love the fact that you know.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
I talked to Chip Roy, Congressman Texas earlier today and
for example, they are putting out what's called the Save Act,
which would require proof of citizenship if you want to vote.
I support that, and I think that you know what's
really Republicans have got to understand now that there's more
they agree on than disagree on, and they've got to
(30:24):
focus on the next one hundred and eighty days. If
republic if Donald Trump, and by the way, I want
to lower your expectations. The odds are not that Donald
Trump is going to get an acquittal. The best I'm
hoping for would be a hung jury. That would be
the best. Honestly, I just I have no faith that
New York that he can get a fair trial in
New York. And with that said, I believe any conviction
(30:46):
will be overturned on appeal. But I don't want your
expectations to be, oh, he's going to be acquitted. No,
they have stacked the deck against him with the judge
and the jury and everything in between. It is not
a friendly venue, never has been. They take the third
highest ranking, you know, partisan Justice Department official to prosecute
the case for Alvin Bragg gets horrible. But with all
(31:07):
that said, I don't think that case is going to
matter a lick when it comes to what happens in
one hundred and eighty days and we can shock the
world and change the world. That's why I'm deputizing every
one of you listening to my voice right now, do
everything in your power so you don't wake up the
morning after election day and say, oh, I should have
(31:29):
put more effort in anyway, Let's see what happens. Eight
hundred nine four one Seawan appreciate the call, Kevin
All right, Leonard Skinner, simple man.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
That can only mean one thing on this radio program,
and that is all things self proclaimed simple man. That
means all things Bill O'Reilly, all things O'Reilly at billoreilly
dot com. We have been talking a lot about the
unmitigated disaster which was the cross examination of Stormy Daniels
yesterday and the just the tawdry, salacious, immaterial relevant testimony
(01:01):
that she gave all day yesterday. I guess she's back
on the stand tomorrow. And how this to me is
a very scary time in our country. This is what
we have been discussing at length about the weaponization of
our justice system and how it's been politicized. And you're
dealing with an eight year old case. You're dealing with
a case where the judge is a Biden donor, where
(01:24):
a family member could very well stand to benefit career
wise and financially from the case, a misdemeanor whose statute
of limitations have passed, and of course some convoluted application
of federal election law under which they have no jurisdiction.
On top of that, a gag order that allows anybody
(01:46):
that is going to testify for the prosecution. They can
go out and they can ask for gifts on social
media as they analyze the case on cable TV and
interview after interview on social media. I mean, are just
repulsive times the idea. I think the worst thing that
came out yesterday is not the fact that Stormy Daniels
(02:07):
admits she hates Donald Trump, that she wants Donald Trump
in jail. I think the worst part is she admits
to being coached by the prosecution. And is that how
our legal system now works, That people that are going
to be witnesses for the prosecution get coached on what
they should say and how they should act and what
(02:29):
they should do. Does that sound like equal justice under
the law and equal application of our laws in this country. Well,
Bill O'Reilly's simple man actually put out on Bill O'Reilly
dot com. He use the word revolting to describe what
happened yesterday. And I noticed that, and I can't think
of a better adjective.
Speaker 1 (02:49):
Sir, how are you you know?
Speaker 3 (02:51):
I'm a wordsmith, but oh.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
My gosh, do you have to start? You're starting in already?
Go ahead?
Speaker 3 (02:57):
All of this helps trump, It all helps. Let me
just walk you through it. So the first essential question
and I don't think the Trump lawyer is doing a
good job. By the way, So the first essential question
I would have asked Stormy Daniels is why do you
want money for this alleged meeting? Why do you want
(03:25):
money for it? Okay, isn't that the first question she
wants more?
Speaker 2 (03:31):
That's that's one of the first questions. I'm hearing you out.
I'm giving you space, mister tall.
Speaker 3 (03:37):
Yeah, that's where it all goes to. So she's sworn in,
I'm the lawyer. I go up and I go, well,
you know, just before the president's presidential election twenty sixteen,
you were demanding money for a social occasion. I would
use that word social occasion. Okay, why.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
You know what the worst part of this bill is
all of the salacious details that this this judge, this
Biden donor judge allowed yesterday. None of it was material
to the case. None of it is relevant to.
Speaker 3 (04:13):
The law because of the appeal is a lock.
Speaker 1 (04:17):
The appeal is a lock. Here's the problem with the
appeal bill.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
The appeal is going to happen after the election, I know,
and for the and from if he gets convicted, which
I think he will because it's new York. I believe
that every other word is going to be, you know,
convict Donald Trump. Could you know, ex con Donald Trump?
Convict Donald Trump, convict Donald Trump. That's all you're gonna hear.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
I don't think so. Now I think he's going to
get acquitted because I'm putting the jury.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
You really wait, you think he's going to get acquitted
with a New York jury? You really believe that, at
best he might get a hung jury.
Speaker 1 (04:53):
At best?
Speaker 3 (04:54):
Okay, so that means he's acquitted.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
Not really.
Speaker 3 (04:59):
They could reach, but they don't have to and they
probably won't. So anyway, just stay with me, Hannity. I'm
in the jury, Okay, I hate Trump, and I'm in
the jury, and I'm listening to this woman rail on
and on and on about things that have nothing to
do with the alleged crime of election fraud. That's what
(05:26):
it is. That's what comes down to. That's what Bragg is.
Speaker 1 (05:28):
Well, we'll hang on one second.
Speaker 2 (05:30):
They claim that, but we don't even really know what
federal statute or by what standard. But you're used to
take a misdemeanor to a fellon if we don't even know.
Speaker 3 (05:41):
That yet, you're doing two different tracks now, you're analyzing
from the macro point of view. I'm on the jury
I'm in the jury box. That's where I want to
go here. So I'm in the jury box and I
hate Trump, but I'm a fair human being and I'm
listening to this testimony from this woman who's obviously unhinged
(06:03):
and has a motivation to get money. That's what she
wants money. And everybody knows that there's no two sides
through the story. So that's what the Trump lawyer should
be saying. Hey, this isn't about election fraud. It's not
about anything other than a political prosecution by people who
(06:24):
hate Donald Trump, and this woman is part of it.
And in addition to hating him, she wants money from him. Now,
let me introduce another name. And I don't know and
I'm going to ask you if you know the name.
And I didn't know the name, So I'm going to
mit that up top. Until I started my investigation of
this last week, Dino said, Judin, you know what you know?
(06:47):
Who is I do not. In November twenty fifteen, Dino
said Jujen, a former doorman at the Trump Tower, tried
to sell a story to the National Inquiry that Donald
Trump buthered a child out of wedlock while Mary.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
Oh the doorman dead doorman.
Speaker 3 (07:04):
Dino said, Judan, he did exactly the same thing that
Stormy Daniels and the other one did. Okay, tried to
get money by saying salacious things about Donald Trump. The
National Inquirer gave him thirty thousand dollars, and I assume
they were reimbarrassed by my uncle Cohen. Okay, I assume it.
I don't know for sure, but I believe that's the case.
(07:27):
The story turned out to be completely bogus, completely untrue,
because the woman that he named to the National Inquirer,
they checked her out and she said, I'm in pregnant.
But he got to keep the thirty k Dino. Okay,
Why isn't Dino on a stand? Why didn't Bragg bring
(07:48):
Dino into the courtroom. Why isn't the jury hearing Dino?
Dino got three thousand.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
By the way, if Trump's attorneys were smart, they could
called Dino into the courtroom.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
Could and it.
Speaker 4 (08:00):
Blows up the whole thing, because anybody a week out
from the presidential election, anybody having Dino and Stormy and
the other one demanding money, you shut them up. Because
they would affect the election, because the press isn't gonna
(08:24):
check out Dino. They're just gonna print the accusation. And
it's a week before the vote, so of course you're
gonna do that.
Speaker 3 (08:33):
Anybody would do it and approve my point.
Speaker 4 (08:36):
The message of the day on Bill O'Reilly is about
Grover Cleveland and the exact same thing happened to him
in New York State in eighteen seventy six.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
Exactly ended up getting elected president.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
He won, but very narrowly. And the one showed up
and the woman said, which was true.
Speaker 4 (09:01):
That Cleveland fathered here child out of wedlock, blah blah blah,
blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
But with the jury, with the human beings who make
this decision, ultimately have to know is that this is
a total fraud, politically generated thing, and that's how you
get an acquittal, That's how you get a hung jury.
Final point I want to make I use the word
revolting because that's what it is. And it is so
(09:29):
shameful that the State of New York would participate in this.
You don't think that people around a country are looking
at the State of New York going that's a sewer sewer,
that's what that place is, even people who hate Trump.
And by extension, Trump will get out of this one,
(09:50):
and George's falling apart, and the Malague document thing isn't
going to happen.
Speaker 2 (09:56):
And Washington's falling apart also, and the President will be
granted limited immunity by the Supreme Court number one, and
that second case that is not related to him will
impact his case.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
So right from today, Trump has got all the legal
stuff behind him. He emerges a winner on this whole thing.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
And that I am not convinced you're right in your
conclusion that we that he will have an acquittal. His
best shot might be a hung jury might be Okay,
let me let me bring this up for you because
and this gets to the entire crux of the legal aspect. Really,
what we're talking about here, Bill, is a bookkeeping error.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
That's all this is.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
That would be a misdemeanor in New York based on
the Statute of New York State and New York City. Uh,
the statute of limitations have long since past. If somebody
gets involved in an NDA, a non disclosure agreement, which
by the way, probably the prosecutor's office has hundreds of them.
If I had to venture a guess, I would just
(11:02):
most corporations have them. It's a it's a way of
coming to a settlement. And both sides then agreed that
they won't talk about the settlement post settlement. All right,
it is not illegal to engage in an ndaight or
to have an NDA We're talking about a bookkeeping mistake.
My question to Stormy Daniels would be, Miss Daniels, I
(11:25):
have a question for you. You said you were you
were pressured, you felt pressure, you felt you felt threatened
to sign that January thirtieth, twenty eighteen statement, and in
that statement you said that the fact of the matter
is is that each party to this alleged affair has
denied its existence in two thousand and six, twenty eleven,
(11:48):
twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, and now again in twenty eighteen.
I'm not denying this affair because I was paid quote
unquote hush money, as has been reported in overseas own tabloid.
I'm denying this affair because it never happened. That's what
she says, Miss Daniels. Were you feeling pressure in two
(12:09):
thousand and six when you made that public statement. Were
you feeling pressure? Were you under pressure in twenty eleven
or twenty sixteen or twenty seventeen. And when you finally
did tell your story in a book, you were being
paid to write that book.
Speaker 1 (12:25):
Is that correct?
Speaker 2 (12:26):
And when you sold your story in Touch magazine or
whatever the tabloid was, you were being paid for that.
Is that not correct? So I think all of her
testimony is completely impeached. But the fact that the Biden
donor judge allowed this to unfold in this courtroom is
a national disgrace. The fact that this case was even
(12:47):
brought is a national disgrace. The fact that the third
highest ranking Justice Department official in the Biden Justice Department
left that prestigious position to run points on this prosecution
or persecution of Donald Trump is nothing but a total
(13:07):
a travesty. If you believe in the rule of law,
if you believe in equal justice under the law, and
if you believe an equal application of our laws, you
get the last words.
Speaker 3 (13:18):
Yeah, I mean, look, that's why I said at the
beginning of our conversation today that Trump really emerges the
winner on all this, even if you don't like him.
Nobody in their right mind would think that Stormy Daniels
is a credible witness. She owes Donald Trump five hundred
and sixty thousand dollars. Do you think the jury members
know that they haven't been told that yet.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
No, that actually came up in trial yesterday, and she
actually testified that she has no intention wells he had
said publicly already that she had no intention of ever
paying it right, and then was asked if she's going
to pay it back and she said, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
So anyway, no one believes this is up and up.
It comes down on a partisanship again. People hate Trump,
They'll vote for Biden. Fair minded people I think will
vote for Trump. And there why do you have.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
So much confidence in this jury? I'm having a hard
time understanding that part.
Speaker 3 (14:12):
Believe that you get twelve individuals who are rotten corrupt people.
I think out of the twelve, you'll have maybe six
who are rotten and corrupt, and the other six probably aren't.
And I'm going just by human nature now.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
So, but there's been so much smoke and mirrors. They
talk about a conspiracy, they talk about election and afearans,
they talk about everything except what he's been charged with.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
Listen. Even people on the Golden Bachelor can understand this.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
By the way, oh Riley, you may be on the
Golden Bachelor. I nominate you to go on the Golden Bachelor.
Speaker 3 (14:47):
That's cruel because I don't want to myself on anybody else.
You're just being.
Speaker 1 (14:52):
No, no, no, no, you're not.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
I bet you A lot of people would be interested
in courting you and maybe thinking about or contem plating
marrying you.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
It would be great.
Speaker 3 (15:01):
Not after ten minutes of talking to me, they'd be
out the door.
Speaker 1 (15:05):
That's probably true.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
All right, Bill O'Reilly dot com All things simple man,
quick break right back, will continue.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
Marking every day to remember the forgotten Man.
Speaker 5 (15:18):
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
Al right, twenty five to the top of the hour,
eight hundred and nine four one, Sean. If you want
to be a part of the program, you may not
know this. A violent crime is committed in America, our country,
every twenty four seconds. Now when it hits your doorstep,
one wrong decision that could mean losing your home, your freedom,
or even worse. And that's you know, just because owning
(15:42):
a gun just isn't enough anymore. Listen, you need a
new way to protect yourself and your family. Let me
tell you about Rod Chadwick. I met him. He's the
former head of training for the FBI at Quantico. He
doesn't teach gun tricks or gimmicks. That's no, that's not
all he does here. He's great with a firearm. He
knows how to spot danger before it's too late, and
(16:05):
how to stop an attacker with words, and how to
make a life or death decision under pressure. Now, Robin
the US Concealed Carry Association, they have created a free video.
You need to watch it to get ready for all
that is coming with no bail and defund and dismantle
and reimagining the police and what's been happening and what's
(16:27):
going to get worse now. This video is not for everyone.
It is one of the most important law officers giving
tips that few civilians ever get to hear. And it's
available to Hannity listeners for a very limited time. I
want you to go to this website right now, watch
it for free. It's Defendfamily dot Com. Watch it right now.
(16:48):
Defendfamily dot Com. That's d F E N D family
one word dot com.
Speaker 3 (16:54):
All right.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
Even the mob and the media are pretty much seeing
what this does of Stormy Daniels was yesterday and what
a disaster this trial has become. And you can tell
they're getting very antsy, although they were very cocky in
the beginning of this trial, thinking this is a slam dunk.
Harry Littman is an MSDNC legal analyst and listened to
(17:18):
him describe Stormy Daniels as a colorful guest who irritated
the judge. You don't think the jury noticedes that.
Speaker 6 (17:25):
Listen, We're talking about a very very colorful witness who
detailed kinds of events and just while you know, efforts
and ways of being that I think for the jury
were fairly foreign. She spoke very quickly, nervously. She told
a lot of jokes and not all of them landed.
(17:45):
I haven't seen Mayr Chan this in this trial be
so sort of irritated, and it came across, I think
as being irritated with her level of detail. That's something
if you're the DA you're worried about because you don't
want them to think that he the judge is actually
displeased in any way with the witness.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
And you have another MSDNZ legal expert saying that Stormy
Daniels turned the trial into a quasi sexual assault case,
and most of her testimony was probably unnecessary. Most of it,
pretty much all of it. It was all irrelevant, It
was all immaterial.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
Listen.
Speaker 7 (18:24):
I think Stormy daniels testimony could have been accomplished with
three words in the sense that we had sex. Everything
else was probably unnecessary. It goes back to the issue.
This is not a sex assault case, and the defense
is going to argue and right or wrong, this is
what they will argue on appeal that that kind of
testimony turned this into a quasi sex assault case, which
(18:47):
painted the defendant in an unnecessarily bad light in a
way that you can't unring the bell. Stormy Daniels is
one of those witnesses that tends to not just answer
the question asked, but add her own editorial. And that
is a really dangerous thing.
Speaker 1 (19:02):
I promise you.
Speaker 7 (19:02):
The prosecution is sitting at their desk saying, just answer
the question. Please, just answer the question, Please, just the question,
no editorialize.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
All right, let's get to our busy phones. But even
they're beginning to get it. Eight hundred and ninety four one,
Shawn is a number. If you want to be a
part of the program. Gina is in the state of California,
the socialist Marxist utopia.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
What's going on?
Speaker 5 (19:24):
How are you, oh, Sean, I'm so happy that I'm
on I need your help. I reached my breaking point.
I've lived in southern California all my life. My line
in the sand was going to be the sanctuary state
where we let the convicted felons out the back door
and we don't tell the Fed so they can go
back in the street. However, now with I'm paying medical
(19:48):
one hundred percent pay, no copays, no out of pocket expenses, all.
Speaker 2 (19:53):
These Well, if you're any illegal immigrant, you get free
healthcare in California.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
You know that, right, That's right.
Speaker 5 (20:00):
So now I'm paying one hundred percent free health care.
They don't pay a premium, they don't pay a co pay,
and it's one hundred percent paid by me. They got
free driver's license a couple of years ago. Now one
hundred percent paid state tuition. And I just get a
letter from my kids' school saying that if English is
(20:20):
your second language, you have priority to get on the
list for after school care. So now they are above
me as far as my kids getting on the list
for after school care. My parents came from New York
sixty four years ago to California, paying taxes. Their children
and grandchildren now have less right than someone who just
(20:40):
hopped over the border. So here's the help I need
from you. I've had it. Tomorrow, me and my three boys,
I got triplets, we're jumping on a plane to Florida
and we are meeting with a real estate agent at
one hundred and fourteen new home bills in the Tampa area.
And I need your advice because I don't know if
I could and the humidity, but I have had What
(21:04):
should I do? Tell me?
Speaker 1 (21:06):
Well, first of all, the weather's very similar.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
I did live in Santa Barbara for five years in
southern California, and the weather's very similar to their Where
in California?
Speaker 5 (21:15):
Do you live Ocean side area? So it's a pretty
nice area.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Yeah, No, it's a very nice area where you are.
And look, this is what you've got to do. Got
to You've got to find the place that's right for you.
Speaker 1 (21:27):
Tampa.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
I happen to love I have a lot of friends there.
I know what will become your favorite restaurant. It's going
to be Chicken Salad Chick because my friends Paul and
Lindsay run the place and they have a number of
stores around the Tampa area and it's phenomenal, uh, and
the people are wonderful. The biggest change for me has
been a very very discernible way that people react to me.
(21:53):
All Right, I'm a public figure, I'm fair game. I
understand that people in New York City are not gonna
like me. But it was was getting pretty downright hostile
for me at the end, and I felt it was
becoming a danger not only for me, but anybody that
might be with me at any given time.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
And I just didn't like it.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
And and I had to be very selective where I went,
and I just I didn't feel free, and I never
liked the weather. And on top of it, I just saw,
you know, crime and disintegrating government in front of my eyes.
You know, was taxes a consideration? Absolutely. Here's my advice.
Take your trip and take a look at areas that
(22:32):
you think you might be interested in, and then you
have to look into the all the legal steps that
are necessary to domicile become a resident and a full
time Floridian. And by the way, the things that I
had to do. The list was long, and I hired
lawyers and accountants to do it all the right way,
(22:54):
the legal way, and I just followed it by the book.
I just you know, I hired the right people that
know their job, and there are people that just help
other people from other states make the transition to Florida
and do it in a clean way and do it
in a legal way. And I did it that way.
But I will tell you it's the best move I
ever made. I don't regret it, and haven't regretted it
(23:15):
one second, and I couldn't be happier now. Well, I
occasionally go back to New York and say hello to
some of my friends. Yeah, maybe a couple of weekends
a year, And to be honest, though, they all want
to come down here and see me because the weather's petter,
especially in the winter time. But I don't think you'll
regret it. I really I have found the people so
(23:37):
welcoming to me, and everybody that I know down here
just they're very nice people, and they're from all over
the country. The west coast of Florida tends to be
more Midwestern people from Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. You know,
salt of the Earth people on the east coast of Florida,
you tend to have more people from the northeast. But
(24:00):
with that said, you have people coming from all over
the country. I think you're going to see this migration continue,
probably for fifty more years. You still have baby boomers
that have yet to retire, and I think for a
lot of different reasons, people are going to be moving
down here more and more. Miami seems to be growing
into Wall Street South, and I think you're going to
(24:20):
see more financial institutions abandoning New York as the years
go on and people realize that it's a better way
to live. The schools you mentioned schools. Schools are number
one in terms of student learning of every state in
Florida for about half the cost that they're paying in California.
(24:42):
If you look at the crime rate, violent crime rate,
it's half of what it is in California. You have
a governor that literally has a higher population than the
state of New York, and their budget is half of
what New York's is, and their infrastructures a thousand times better.
So I think that this is a much better place
(25:02):
to raise your family and you're going to find like
minded people. The only thing I say to other people
listening to us that might be considering moving here, if
you're going to bring your liberal, leftist Marxist values with you,
stay where you are.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
Absolutely and Desanta signed in the voucher system. My kids
can go to a private school and get eight thousand
dollars because the indoctrination right now at the schools in
San Diego, you wouldn't even believe it. Sean you.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
Yeah, but you know what, you might be able to
use the public schools because they're not you know, they're
being really diligent in Florida in terms of age appropriate
materials and focusing on reading, writing, maths, science, history, and computers.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
They're not focused on woke.
Speaker 5 (25:44):
And it's because one of their thing classrooms is just
decorated with LGBT flats. I don't know why. I don't
know why someone's sexuality is in my kids classroom, but
that's what it is, all over the classroom. Signed, and
I don't even know how they get away with it.
But I'm hoping that they're not going to see that,
that they're just actually going to learn.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
I will tell you that I think look this is
air condition everywhere. I mean, you know, even when I
lived in New York, to be honest, you know, winter
weather wasn't that bad for me, because I'd get out
of a car, I'd go to a building and i'd
be in a room, or and then i'd get back
in a car, go to another building, and then I'd
be in a room, and if the heat wasn't high enough,
I'd put it up. So I didn't have to experience
(26:29):
that much of the winter burden, if you will. My
days of shoveling were over, so I didn't have to
worry about that too much. And I just I'll tell you,
I just think the people down here very special. I think,
you know, the entire southern part of the United States
are people that probably share your values and are committed
to the things you're committed to, and they believe in
(26:51):
the values that you believe in. And let New York,
in California and Illinois and New Jersey, you know, go
their own way and they'll have their value values, and
I guess the people will put up with their high taxes, burdens,
some regulation, horrible weather and everything in between.
Speaker 5 (27:08):
Yeah. Absolutely, And DeSantis has you know, he's done a
great job.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
He's been a great governor honestly, and he's become a
great friend. Yeah, and I was glad to see that
him and President Trump got together and hopefully put their
differences aside. I think there's way more they agree on
than disagree on. Campaigns get you know, pretty pretty brutal sometimes,
and that happened, but I'm glad they put it past them.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
Anyway.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
I appreciate it. We will welcome you with open arms
that I can tell you. Don't let not your heart
beat trouble there.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
Okay.
Speaker 5 (27:42):
I don't know where you're living because you're not disclosing it.
But I don't know. I hope maybe I see on
my trip.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
Well maybe this year I might go out on a
little Hannity tour at some point.
Speaker 1 (27:52):
I don't know. I haven't decided yet. We're working on
a couple of things.
Speaker 5 (27:54):
Okay, thanks so much, Sean.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn. If you want to
be a part of the program, all right, quick freak.
We'll come right back, and more of your calls coming
up straight ahead, toll free. It is eight hundred and
nine to four one, Shawn. If you want to be
a part of the program as we continue broadcasting throughout
the greatest country in the world.
Speaker 3 (28:20):
You are locked in on.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
The Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Show showho, Let's get back to our busy phones. Kevin
San Francisco, Next Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 8 (28:33):
Hi, Hey Sean, how you doing.
Speaker 1 (28:36):
What's going on? Doing good?
Speaker 4 (28:38):
Well?
Speaker 8 (28:38):
Thanks for all you what you do. I pray to
God that Donald Trump, our President Trump, gets acquitted and
comes back in fights the even the Republican Party, because
there's a lot of whimps in the Republican Party that
will not stand up for President Trump yet alone for
(29:02):
the American people. They let the Democrats change the narrative.
And that's what I love about President Trump is he
will change it and flip it on a dime and
actually have the media spun out on stuff like he
can go in there and say, hey, you could be
a pro choice, you can be for abortion, and I
(29:24):
would love for him to say, like, you know what,
you can fall back on that, but I will put
the same amount of money into people that want to
fight for life and have that, you know as an option.
I'm pro life. I believe in God, I believe you know,
that's that's what we're here for. But if he went
(29:48):
in there and changed the narrative and had people think
about it and be like, you know what, I have
a choice, we will overwhelmingly win.
Speaker 2 (29:56):
Let me say this, all of the things that you're
saying can happen hundred and eighty days.
Speaker 1 (30:01):
Okay. I love the fact that you know.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
I talked to Chip Roy, Congressman Texas earlier today and
for example, they are putting out what's called the Save Act,
which would require proof of citizenship if you want to vote.
I support that, and I think that you know what's
really Republicans have got to understand now that there's more
they agree on than disagree on, and they've got to
(30:24):
focus on the next one hundred and eighty days. If
republic if Donald Trump, and by the way, I want
to lower your expectations. The odds are not that Donald
Trump is going to get an acquittal. The best I'm
hoping for would be a hung jury. That would be
the best. Honestly, I just I have no faith that
New York that he can get a fair trial in
New York. And with that said, I believe any conviction
(30:46):
will be overturned on appeal. But I don't want your
expectations to be, oh, he's going to be acquitted. No,
they have stacked the deck against him with the judge
and the jury and everything in between. It is not
a friendly venue, never has been. They take the third
highest ranking, you know, partisan Justice Department official to prosecute
the case for Alvin Bragg gets horrible. But with all
(31:07):
that said, I don't think that case is going to
matter a lick when it comes to what happens in
one hundred and eighty days and we can shock the
world and change the world. That's why I'm deputizing every
one of you listening to my voice right now, do
everything in your power so you don't wake up the
morning after election day and say, oh, I should have
(31:29):
put more effort in anyway, Let's see what happens. Eight
hundred nine four one Seawan appreciate the call, Kevin
The Sean Hannity Show News
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
The Nikki Glaser Podcast
Every week comedian and infamous roaster Nikki Glaser provides a fun, fast-paced, and brutally honest look into current pop-culture and her own personal life.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.